View Full Version : SI Ranks TD #5 player in NBA
Hoover
09-19-2014, 09:27 AM
Surprised it was that high, TBH ...
http://www.si.com/nba/video/2014/09/19/sis-top-10-players-2015
celldweller
09-19-2014, 09:31 AM
Chris Paul? Aghh.
Texas_Ranger
09-19-2014, 09:33 AM
They fucked his stats.
Keep him off the All Star team again this year NBA.
Dverde
09-19-2014, 10:09 AM
Any list with Durant being #2 can't be all wrong.
JWest596
09-19-2014, 10:29 AM
Chris Paul has and keeps snookering more mainstream NBA writers in history. Probably more to do with the Sterling controversy than anything.
I doubt Tony will ever gets his due much like Bowen never did.
RD2191
09-19-2014, 10:30 AM
CP3 is garbage. TP owns that piece of shit.
spursparker9
09-19-2014, 10:38 AM
CP3 peaked during the 2008 playoffs western semi against Spurs.
After that is all declining
Mr. Body
09-19-2014, 10:52 AM
CP3 peaked during the 2008 playoffs western semi against Spurs.
After that is all declining
I can't disagree with this. Deron Williams, his draft-mate, is completely done. Chris Paul has only had slightly more longetivity.
monkeypunk
09-19-2014, 11:16 AM
Any list with Durant being #2 can't be all wrong.
:lol
Raven
09-19-2014, 11:18 AM
the davis dicksucking is getting out of control, the guy has never even been close to the play offs and now he is supposed to be in the mvp conversation? :lol
wildbill2u
09-19-2014, 11:33 AM
The vid only showed the top 10 but supposedly they have a list of top 100. Would like to see that list.
Congrats to Tim, but his is a makeup vote because of the Championship. And there's nothing wrong with that.
spurs10
09-19-2014, 11:38 AM
Well Pop has often mentioned that their style of playing is bad for the players' stats. When you figure that no one average more than 30 mpg last year, you know why. The proof is in the pudding and Tony has to grin and bear it when they try to lionize Chris Paul, who did probably peak in 200.8. CP3's pudding bowl is mighty empty.
Mel_13
09-19-2014, 11:38 AM
5. Duncan
15. Parker
28. Leonard
41. Ginobili
70. Splitter
96. Green
100. Diaw
http://www.si.com/nba/2014/top-100-nba-players-2015-list
Richie
09-19-2014, 11:56 AM
Timmy deserves #5 based on his per minute production, but shouldn't be that high because he can't play the kind of minutes that younger guys can.
Having said that if you asked me who I'd want on my team going in to a playoff run, Duncan and Dirk are easily in my Top 5
Spurs 4 The Win
09-19-2014, 12:05 PM
5. Duncan
15. Parker
28. Leonard
41. Ginobili
70. Splitter
96. Green
100. Diaw
http://www.si.com/nba/2014/top-100-nba-players-2015-list
Leonard at #28 is a fucking joke, good god :lol
Spurs 4 The Win
09-19-2014, 12:10 PM
I also got a really good laugh out of CPFlop being ahead of Tony and Westbrook, he is such an overrated piece of shit, ringless fagg:lolt
Seventyniner
09-19-2014, 12:11 PM
5. Duncan
15. Parker
28. Leonard
41. Ginobili
70. Splitter
96. Green
100. Diaw
http://www.si.com/nba/2014/top-100-nba-players-2015-list
Decent ratings, though I think they underrate Green and overrate Manu somewhat.
As for Green, who knows if he would be as successful in a different system but he is fantastic for the Spurs. Even if salary cap issues are ignored I wouldn't trade him for DeRozan straight up.
In the playoffs Manu deserves his ranking, but he can't put up enough minutes in the regular season to be that high overall. He wouldn't be nearly as useful to a non-playoff team.
Duncan is slightly overrated for the same reason, though he is more durable than Manu and is much more important to the team's defense. Duncan has a legit chance to be first team All-NBA at 39. Unreal.
Brazil
09-19-2014, 12:24 PM
Green too low, he should be close to Manu
Diaw 100 ? :lol that's a joke
still.focused
09-19-2014, 12:55 PM
If Diaw played for any other team hed never even sniff 100. I love Bobo but if but he benefits from this system note than any other player IMO
How many other teams could Diaw okay for and be this much a contributor
The answer is NONE
We all know he's talented but SA might be the only place in the league where less than mediocre numbers in a variety of categories is held in such a regard as opposed to high numbers in few categories
And that's simply because of the system
100 is generous Manu might be too high. Parker n Green too low
Arcadian
09-19-2014, 01:01 PM
Seriously, it's not even a stretch to say TD is still a top 5 player in the league. He is still one of the most valuable players who affects the game in so many ways, and just flat out helps the team win. Despite being 38 years old, and despite not being the focal point of the Spurs anymore, he is still the centerpiece that makes everything run efficiently. He's the engine. The team is still built around him, amazingly.
ambchang
09-19-2014, 01:28 PM
Duncan is still a great player, from an individual player stand point, Duncan is not #5. Most GMs will pick Griffin, Curry, Unibrow and even Dwight over him.
Obviously Duncan is the main defensive cog on the Spurs, and his offense is an integral part of a championship team, but the team was built specifically around him.
If people remember the finals, Games 1 and 2 were close because the Spurs still had a tendency to feed Duncan in the post and isos with Parker, and it stalled the offense and allowed the Miami defense to set. The Spurs were so successful in games 3 to 5 because the Spurs went away from that and started whipping the ball around to break down the Miami defense.
Duncan is no longer the kind of guy you can have carry a championship offense, like his earlier self.
People citing team success is discrediting the work Parker, Kawhi, Ginobili, Diaw, Mills, Splitter, and Pop did last year.
ElNono
09-19-2014, 01:59 PM
Lots of these rankings sneak in the "potential" canard or rank based on "brand name"... just a word of warning...
baseline bum
09-19-2014, 02:25 PM
Duncan at #5 is ludicrous. This is just the media pigeonholing the Spurs' title into the conventional wisdom of teams needing a star player to carry them to a championship. Sorry son, the Spurs won a title with 8 players playing at a high level making roughly similar levels of contribution.
Raven
09-19-2014, 02:32 PM
Duncan at #5 is ludicrous. This is just the media pigeonholing the Spurs' title into the conventional wisdom of teams needing a star player to carry them to a championship. Sorry son, the Spurs won a title with 8 players playing at a high level making roughly similar levels of contribution.
not just that, but timmy's D regressed a lot from last year, so the improvement is not justified.
baseline bum
09-19-2014, 02:34 PM
not just that, but timmy's D regressed a lot from last year, so the improvement is not justified.
Yeah, Duncan massively turned the clock back in 2012-13.
Texas_Ranger
09-19-2014, 02:41 PM
i love how Igoudala is always high on this lists... The guy sucks and he's still ranked 29th, just after Kawhi but ahead of 5 times better players.
Arcadian
09-19-2014, 02:53 PM
...but the team was built specifically around him.
Exactly. How many players can you build a team around and win a championship?
Probably 5 or less.
baseline bum
09-19-2014, 03:00 PM
Kobe Bryant at 24, 4 slots ahead of Leonard. What a fucking joke.
Raven
09-19-2014, 03:11 PM
i love how Igoudala is always high on this lists... The guy sucks and he's still ranked 29th, just after Kawhi but ahead of 5 times better players.
i agree, his ranking made me laugh very hard..
ambchang
09-19-2014, 03:17 PM
Exactly. How many players can you build a team around and win a championship?
Probably 5 or less.
With the level of talent that Duncan has around him? Most definitely more than five.
Malik Hairston
09-19-2014, 03:47 PM
These lists are always really, really bad:lol..
Tim isn't even close to a top 5 player at this point, and I say this despite him being my favorite of all-time..
Parker is only in the top 15 if you're assuming that last season was an anomaly and he was fatigued, rather than on the decline..
Green and Diaw at 96 and 100 is absolutely ridiculous and embarrassing, tbh..
FuzzyLumpkins
09-19-2014, 04:09 PM
I can't disagree with this. Deron Williams, his draft-mate, is completely done. Chris Paul has only had slightly more longetivity.
Williams strikes me as undisciplined and lazy. Paul can lay off the hamburger helper.
Malik Hairston
09-19-2014, 04:14 PM
Kobe is ranked way too high for a semi-retired player that looked like a D-league caliber player last year..
Wade can't even play more than 60 games in a season, there's no way he's in the top 20:lol..
I didn't see where Derrick Rose is ranked, but I'm sure he's way too high, too..
Texas_Ranger
09-19-2014, 05:10 PM
Kobe is ranked way too high for a semi-retired player that looked like a D-league caliber player last year..
Wade can't even play more than 60 games in a season, there's no way he's in the top 20:lol..
I didn't see where Derrick Rose is ranked, but I'm sure he's way too high, too..
#23 :lol
This rankings are a joke so who cares tbh.
Obstructed_View
09-19-2014, 05:14 PM
You guys are missing the important question: What number is Kevin Garnett?
Cry Havoc
09-19-2014, 05:29 PM
the davis dicksucking is getting out of control, the guy has never even been close to the play offs and now he is supposed to be in the mvp conversation? :lol
Are you serious? The dude is barely old enough to drink and very well could be the best center in the league this year.
He plays for a terrible franchise. Not exactly his fault. Dude is going to go for 24 and 12 this year with about 3 blocks per game.
Raven
09-19-2014, 05:51 PM
Are you serious? The dude is barely old enough to drink and very well could be the best center in the league this year.
He plays for a terrible franchise. Not exactly his fault. Dude is going to go for 24 and 12 this year with about 3 blocks per game.
since when players from lottery teams get mvps? i don't know if it ever happened.. and those stats are exactly because he plays in a shitty franchise, why do you think love gets those stats?
Malik Hairston
09-19-2014, 06:27 PM
Iguodala's yearly rankings are baffling, tbh..
What's the point of having his ability as a passer that can create for himself, when he rarely actually utilizes it in real games?:lol..
I understood the hype in 2011-2012 when he shot like 38-39% from 3, since the ability to shoot is essential for a wing role player(which Iguodala is, don't get it twisted), but he's been overrated since that season..
Iguodala(great passer, average shot creator, elite defender, mediocre shooter) is not 70 spots better than Danny Green(mediocre passer, poor shot creator, great defender, elite shooter), for example..
Aztecfan03
09-19-2014, 06:42 PM
since when players from lottery teams get mvps? i don't know if it ever happened.. and those stats are exactly because he plays in a shitty franchise, why do you think love gets those stats?
What does this list have to do with the mvp conversation anyways?
Galileo
09-19-2014, 08:08 PM
The best player in the NBA season next year will be Anthony Davis. He is the next Tim Duncan.
Chinook
09-19-2014, 08:08 PM
Green and Diaw at 96 and 100 is absolutely ridiculous and embarrassing, tbh..
And Klay Thompson is probably ranked a lot higher than Green even though he's pretty much the same player.
Mugen
09-19-2014, 08:11 PM
Ranking Timmy at 5 is a discredit to the 2014 NBA Champions tbh.
Splits
09-19-2014, 08:17 PM
:lmao Rubio and Tyreke Evans rated above Green and Diaw :lmao
Cry Havoc
09-19-2014, 09:47 PM
since when players from lottery teams get mvps? i don't know if it ever happened.. and those stats are exactly because he plays in a shitty franchise, why do you think love gets those stats?
Good thing this isn't a list of potential MVPs, then. And you're completely silly if you don't think AD is a monster who would do damage on any team. He's going to be the best center in the league by the middle of next season at the latest.
mkurts
09-19-2014, 09:54 PM
Epic SI list, their panel must have wanked so hard their brains came out full load to write this garbage
If Diaw played for any other team hed never even sniff 100. I love Bobo but if but he benefits from this system note than any other player IMO
Tell that to France
100%duncan
09-20-2014, 01:11 PM
5's too high imho maybe low 10-15 BUT a lot of spurs players should be on 15-30 tbh. We are deep, there's no "1" guy.
Arcadian
09-20-2014, 01:28 PM
With the level of talent that Duncan has around him? Most definitely more than five.
I'm not sure of that. There are very few players who affect the game in as many ways as Duncan, who help the team in as many ways, who can lead with no ego, and who can adapt to whatever pieces you put around him as well as Duncan. Those are factors you have to consider. No one is saying Duncan is a top 5 talent right now, but he's still arguably a top 5 player who you want on your team to help you win.
Obstructed_View
09-20-2014, 02:07 PM
Iguodala's yearly rankings are baffling, tbh..
What's the point of having his ability as a passer that can create for himself, when he rarely actually utilizes it in real games?:lol..
I understood the hype in 2011-2012 when he shot like 38-39% from 3, since the ability to shoot is essential for a wing role player(which Iguodala is, don't get it twisted), but he's been overrated since that season..
Iguodala(great passer, average shot creator, elite defender, mediocre shooter) is not 70 spots better than Danny Green(mediocre passer, poor shot creator, great defender, elite shooter), for example..
Baffling to me is that people consider Iguodala an elite defender. The defensive win shares stat was used to make a case for Iggy a few years back, but he's like seventh on his own team in that stat now. Media members tried so hard to make him into an elite player when he was with AI, and when he didn't live up to that, they throw the great defender term around figuring average NBA fans won't know the difference and just repeat what they hear.
Obstructed_View
09-20-2014, 02:09 PM
I'm not sure of that. There are very few players who affect the game in as many ways as Duncan, who help the team in as many ways, who can lead with no ego, and who can adapt to whatever pieces you put around him as well as Duncan. Those are factors you have to consider. No one is saying Duncan is a top 5 talent right now, but he's still arguably a top 5 player who you want on your team to help you win.
I agree. If you started a team tomorrow, Timmy would likely be nowhere on the list, but if you had to win a game tomorrow, Duncan's a guy you'd definitely pick for your team.
hitmantb
09-20-2014, 10:36 PM
You can't just look at what Duncan brings to the table as a player, he is the Captain America of NBA players.
In his current state, he is not as strong as LeBron/Durant/Griffin's of the world, but the way he leads this team and teaches/supports the younger players is ahead of everyone else. Chemistry is huge huge huge and the way he allows himself to be coached by Pop sets example for everyone else. Everyone on this team love Timmy like a big brother and really wanted to win a ring for him, that is why they bonded and put together something way bigger than the sum of their individual talents. Watching him work out as hard as he does even when he has nothing left to prove, trying his hardest to cover for others, it really brings the best out of everyone else.
You can replace him with a player of greater individual ability and the team still would not be as strong. Also let's not forget in the toughest game of the playoffs, Duncan willed the team to a victory in OT against OKC. He was the best player on the court for a few minutes and made all the differences in the world.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.