Log in

View Full Version : What if Gulf War I had never occurred?



Ocotillo
08-24-2005, 05:20 PM
Something to chew on. Saddam rolled into Kuwait because he felt (or so he said) it was part of Iraq. One of the fears was that he might not stop there and would go onto take Saudi Arabia.

If he had, would we be better off? Saddam enjoyed decent relations with the U.S. prior to his invasion of Kuwait. Would it be better to have a secular tyrant running the Saudi pennisula rather than the shaky royal family that is there now? The royal family is ripe for violent revolution with the extreme wahabbis they have tolerated and allowed to grow. If the extremist take over Saudi Arabia, wouldn't that do more to destabalize world oil markets rather than some dictator who we could work with?

Maybe 9/11 doesn't even happen because Bin Laden is obsessed with Saddam and likely our military bases wouldn't be on the penninsula.

Too late now but an interesting acadmenic discussion.

whottt
08-24-2005, 05:30 PM
Saddam would be the most powerful man in the World and would be able to set World Oil prices all by himself...he probably would have control of the entire middle east by now and he'd definitely have a nuclear arsenal, and the willingness to use it.

His people would still be starving and we'd still be hated by Militant Islam because we are the worlds biggest Oil Consumer, they'd still claim we are supporting an opressive regime...Most of Western Europe would be economically depressed(more than their socialists have them depressed right now) and there would be a bunch of ethnic infighting like Pre Marshall plan Europe.


Usama would still hate Americs and still be tyring to gain control of the middle east...

You don't actually think his reasons for hating America are legitimate do you?

What are his reasons again?

That we defended Saudi Arabia from Saddam?

That we give the Israelis the ability to defend themselves from the 300 million Arabs surrounding them?

That we, along with the rest of the World liberated an Arab country from an Arab dictator? And sanctioned the dicatator?


Sheer politics...this guy doesn't give two fucks about innocent Arabs and Muslims...he doesn't give a fuck about the Palestinians(none of the Arab countries do, that's why they expelled them in the first place)...

He's just a different version of Saddam...

He wants the rebirth of the Ottoman Empire with himself as ruler...


Same thing as Saddam wanted basically...

Same thing they all want basically...

To be king of the middle east.

boutons
08-24-2005, 05:45 PM
"Saddam would be the most powerful man in the World and would be able to set World Oil prices all by himself...he probably would have control of the entire middle east by now and he'd definitely have a nuclear arsenal, and the willingness to use it."

Where do you score your acid?

samikeyp
08-24-2005, 06:50 PM
then we wouldn't have these.

http://i20.ebayimg.com/01/i/01/fc/d7/c3_1_b.JPG

Nbadan
08-25-2005, 01:50 AM
Something to chew on. Saddam rolled into Kuwait because he felt (or so he said) it was part of Iraq. One of the fears was that he might not stop there and would go onto take Saudi Arabia.

If he had, would we be better off? Saddam enjoyed decent relations with the U.S. prior to his invasion of Kuwait. Would it be better to have a secular tyrant running the Saudi pennisula rather than the shaky royal family that is there now? The royal family is ripe for violent revolution with the extreme wahabbis they have tolerated and allowed to grow. If the extremist take over Saudi Arabia, wouldn't that do more to destabalize world oil markets rather than some dictator who we could work with?

Maybe 9/11 doesn't even happen because Bin Laden is obsessed with Saddam and likely our military bases wouldn't be on the penninsula.

Too late now but an interesting acadmenic discussion.

Whott is a lunatic, but he is right this time. Letting Saddam take control of Saudi Arabia would have been disastrous for the US and the Western world. Yes, Saudi Arabia's political instability may someday lead to the overthrow of its outdated feudal system, but the oil will never be part of the equation because it is in the US strategic and economic best interest to make sure that the oil keeps flowing into the world markets. Since the Saudi's have separated the oil wells from its population centers, and American companies run the Saudi wells, it would not be difficult for the U.S. to justify interfering on what would appear to be a internal Saudi matter.