PDA

View Full Version : Would you accept this trade?



N0 LyF3 ScRuB
10-21-2014, 02:56 PM
Warriors get: Danny Green, Patty Mills

Spurs get: Klay Thompson

BatManu20
10-21-2014, 02:57 PM
Unless Patty's injury lingers, no.

Chinook
10-21-2014, 03:01 PM
No. Just as bad as your Green/Diaw for Shumpert deal last year.

313
10-21-2014, 03:01 PM
No. Just as bad as your Green/Diaw for Shumpert deal last year.

Silver&Black
10-21-2014, 03:04 PM
No.....

SupremeGuy
10-21-2014, 03:15 PM
No friggin' way.

RD2191
10-21-2014, 03:17 PM
No. Just as bad as your Green/Diaw for Shumpert deal last year.

Cry Havoc
10-21-2014, 03:17 PM
I think Klay is one of the best SGs in the game, but why would we want to mess with our team chemistry? Stupid trade, especially given that Cojo has yet to prove himself.

Arcadian
10-21-2014, 03:19 PM
A slight upgrade at SG to lose a great backup PG? You trippin'?

apalisoc_9
10-21-2014, 03:22 PM
OP has one of the worst basketball minds in ST..

Reminds me of his stupid Shumpert for Diaw deal last year..

:lol

I wouldn't even trade Green straight up with Klay

DesignatedT
10-21-2014, 03:27 PM
Green and Diaw for Shumpert :lmao

Seventyniner
10-21-2014, 04:15 PM
The only universe in which this is a remotely good idea is one in which:

a) Thompson agrees to an at- or below-market extension
b) Mills is more injured than we thought
c) Green gives heavy hints that he is leaving as a free agent in the offseason and doesn't want to come back to SA

Fireball
10-21-2014, 04:19 PM
Depth is our strength ... trading two good players for one potential great player ... no thanks (especially because I think Klay is a bit overrated on defense ... Green is better in that department)

cd98
10-21-2014, 04:39 PM
LOL, Spurs would take that deal in a second. Golden State would never take that deal.

N0 LyF3 ScRuB
10-21-2014, 04:53 PM
OP has one of the worst basketball minds in ST..

Reminds me of his stupid Shumpert for Diaw deal last year..

:lol

I wouldn't even trade Green straight up with Klay

Shut up faggot, you weren't even around then.


Trying hard :lol

And I think it's not a bad trade especially considering we have no clue how Patty will look.


and :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao @ the bold

Brunodf
10-21-2014, 04:55 PM
Klay expiring contract is 3mil... Green and Mills= 7.5 mil.

If the Spurs could resign Thompson for 4 yr=30 mil after the trade i would accept it... Otherwise is not worth

Walton Buys Off Me
10-21-2014, 05:07 PM
Ask the Miami Heat about Patty Mills.....

jimbo
10-21-2014, 05:12 PM
I'd do it tbh.

Green is a system talent, Klay would be an improvement especially if the system helps him out too. Patty isn't good enough to be a dealbreaker. There's plenty of 6 foot guys that shoot the 3 and play decent D, you just have to look for them. The trouble starts when you try to find guys taller than that...

Hoops Czar
10-21-2014, 06:01 PM
Ask the Miami Heat about Patty Mills.....

Or you could ask the Dallas Mavericks...

Big P
10-21-2014, 06:36 PM
Klay expiring contract is 3mil... Green and Mills= 7.5 mil.

If the Spurs could resign Thompson for 4 yr=30 mil after the trade i would accept it... Otherwise is not worth

4 years and $30 mil??? He's about to get at least $15 mil per year if not more....I would not throw away pretty much all of our future cap space for klay.

TrueSpursFan
10-21-2014, 06:41 PM
At the 7:45 mark.
Nuff said

http://youtu.be/VKm6anpZ3uA

Brunodf
10-21-2014, 06:42 PM
4 years and $30 mil??? He's about to get at least $15 mil per year if not more....I would not throw away pretty much all of our future cap space for klay.
I know. Thats why i said the only way would be worth is if the Spurs signed him for 4yr/30mil...

I don't think a SG that can't create his own shot is worth that much...

Chinook
10-21-2014, 07:01 PM
LOL, Spurs would take that deal in a second. Golden State would never take that deal.

Spurs wouldn't even think about it. No way SA gives up both the best PG defender in the league and a backup PG that finally fits perfectly with Ginobili for a two-guard who's only path for growth would come at the expense of touches for Leonard and who's a sizable step down in terms of all-around defense.

exstatic
10-21-2014, 07:02 PM
Klay Thompson, for all the HYPE, is in reality just a glorified 3 and D guy.

100%duncan
10-21-2014, 07:02 PM
:lol

manufan10
10-21-2014, 07:08 PM
:lol

Welcome back. :lol

SpursFan86
10-21-2014, 07:18 PM
Klay Thompson, for all the HYPE, is in reality just a glorified 3 and D guy.

Yup.

This trade would be absolutely horrible for us lol. Green is already better than Thompson for our system (his defense >>> Thompson's defense), and Patty is one of the best backup PGs in the league.

mkurts
10-21-2014, 07:28 PM
A better deal would be Green and Mills for the Splash bros

Dre_7
10-21-2014, 07:58 PM
No. Just as bad as your Green/Diaw for Shumpert deal last year.

I missed that. WOW! :lol

Good thing RC and Pop don't take advice from Spurs Talk.

apalisoc_9
10-21-2014, 09:36 PM
Shut up faggot, you weren't even around then.


Trying hard :lol

And I think it's not a bad trade especially considering we have no clue how Patty will look.


and :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao @ the bold

I've been a member in this site way before you become a spurs fan...

SanAntonioSpurs23
10-21-2014, 11:15 PM
:lol Klay Thompson blows

RuffnReadyOzStyle
10-21-2014, 11:41 PM
LOL, Spurs would take that deal in a second. Golden State would never take that deal.

No, they wouldn't.


Klay expiring contract is 3mil... Green and Mills= 7.5 mil.

If the Spurs could resign Thompson for 4 yr=30 mil after the trade i would accept it... Otherwise is not worth

Thompson is looking for the max, and there's no way he takes 7.5mil per... he'll end up getting at least 11-12mil because SG is so thin. No way the Spurs would pay Klay 12mil/season.

scanry
10-21-2014, 11:52 PM
I don't think GSW would even trade Klay for Kawhi tbh.

jesterbobman
10-22-2014, 12:51 AM
Hard No.

RPM, like all single measure stats, is imperfect. It is probably the best single measure we have.

Of the 3 players in that group, Klay is 3rd in RPM. He is the youngest, and his RPM may improve. But he's a 3 and D guy who isn't as good as Danny yet, and Patty Mills is great. He's almost locked in to a max, because points are overpaid for, and the Warriors overvalue him, saying no to Love. Danny Green might get $8m, as his minutes and usage limit per game stats.

Danny Green+ Patty Mills will cost ~12m a year.
Klay will cost ~16m a year.

So Patty and Danny give greater per minute value(by RPM), more minutes per game, and will probably cost less(in total) than Klay.

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/RPM/position/2

2013-14 Real Plus-Minus - Shooting Guards


RK
NAME
TEAM
GP
MPG
ORPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/ORPM/position/2)
DRPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/2)
RPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/RPM/position/2)
WAR (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/position/2)


1
Andre Iguodala (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2386/andre-iguodala)
GS
63
32.4
1.89
4.74
6.63
11.47


2
Manu Ginobili (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/272/manu-ginobili)
SA
68
22.8
5.07
0.35
5.42
7.68


3
Vince Carter (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/136/vince-carter)
DAL
81
24.4
2.02
2.46
4.48
8.35


4
Danny Green (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3988/danny-green)
SA
68
24.3
0.79
2.72
3.51
6.13


5
Goran Dragic (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3423/goran-dragic)
PHX
76
35.1
4.57
-1.14
3.43
9.73


6
Kyle Korver (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2011/kyle-korver)
ATL
71
33.9
2.53
0.73
3.26
8.35


7
James Harden (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3992/james-harden)
HOU
73
38.0
5.97
-2.84
3.13
9.67


8
Joe Johnson (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/1007/joe-johnson)
BKN
79
32.6
3.55
-0.80
2.75
7.80


9
Tony Allen (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2367/tony-allen)
MEM
55
23.2
-0.41
2.74
2.33
3.61


10
Kobe Bryant (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/110/kobe-bryant)
LAL
6
29.5
3.87
-1.65
2.22
0.52


11
Jimmy Butler (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6430/jimmy-butler)
CHI
67
38.7
0.90
1.23
2.13
6.77


12
Klay Thompson (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6475/klay-thompson)
GS
81
35.4
2.20
-0.17
2.03
7.91




http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/RPM/position/1

2013-14 Real Plus-Minus - Point Guards


RK
NAME
TEAM
GP
MPG
ORPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/ORPM/position/1)
DRPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/1)
RPM (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/RPM/position/1)
WAR (http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/position/1)


1
Chris Paul (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2779/chris-paul)
LAC
62
35.0
6.03
1.95
7.98
14.47


2
Stephen Curry (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3975/stephen-curry)
GS
78
36.5
6.62
-0.38
6.24
15.48


3
Russell Westbrook (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3468/russell-westbrook)
OKC
46
30.7
4.82
0.23
5.05
6.89


4
Mike Conley (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3195/mike-conley)
MEM
73
33.5
4.28
0.42
4.70
10.24


5
Patrick Beverley (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3964/patrick-beverley)
HOU
56
31.3
2.98
1.29
4.27
7.27


6
Kyle Lowry (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3012/kyle-lowry)
TOR
79
36.2
3.84
0.41
4.25
11.56


7
Eric Bledsoe (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/4238/eric-bledsoe)
PHX
43
32.9
0.11
3.97
4.08
5.79


8
Patty Mills (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/4004/patty-mills)
SA
81
18.9
3.42
0.58
4.00
6.07


9
Ricky Rubio (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/4011/ricky-rubio)
MIN
82
32.2
1.43
2.47
3.90
10.76


10
Ty Lawson (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/4000/ty-lawson)
DEN
62
35.8
4.38
-1.08
3.30
8.32

Kidd K
10-22-2014, 02:42 AM
Considering Mills' injury, it's pretty much Green for Thompson. . .and I'd say no. I like Green's defense and he's an excellent 3pt shooter who doesn't devolve into chucking very often. We don't really need a guy to take a bunch more shots as we need a guy like Green to guards 1's, 2's, and 3's for us.

Thompson would be the better choice over Green for most teams, but not us imo

MilesTeg
10-22-2014, 04:53 AM
Absolutely not, with or without Mills. Green is a guy who'll always provide more than he's paid. He'll always be underrated, and underrated = less market value = great value for the team.

Thompson is the opposite. He's an overrated 3 and D guy, and he will ask to get paid. Once you pay a role player like him a lot, it really screws your team.

Keep the money for big guys, or guys who are true game changers. Avoid "star" guards with limited impact on the game. In the long run Thompson is a handicap for any team.

benefactor
10-22-2014, 05:45 AM
OP thinks Cam Newton is a franchise QB. That should tell you everything you need to know.

Captivus
10-22-2014, 06:22 AM
No way.
I would only consider this (without taking into account money issues) if it was for one of them plus...idk...Bonner.
But both of them! NO.

100%duncan
10-22-2014, 08:22 AM
Welcome back. :lol
:bobo :lmao

Leetonidas
10-22-2014, 09:11 AM
Thompson is a glorified Danny Green and one of the most overrated players in the league imo...giving up Patty makes this a hell no. :td

hyhy
10-22-2014, 12:14 PM
I would take it up if you change Patty for Errors.

illusioNtEk
10-22-2014, 12:18 PM
trade with green ? maybe........ but add patty? fuk nooo

jimbo
10-22-2014, 06:16 PM
I don't think GSW would even trade Klay for Kawhi tbh.

They wouldn't even give him + filler for Kevin Love. No way they'd do it for Kawhi.


Hard No.

RPM, like all single measure stats, is imperfect. It is probably the best single measure we have.

Of the 3 players in that group, Klay is 3rd in RPM. He is the youngest, and his RPM may improve. But he's a 3 and D guy who isn't as good as Danny yet, and Patty Mills is great. He's almost locked in to a max, because points are overpaid for, and the Warriors overvalue him, saying no to Love. Danny Green might get $8m, as his minutes and usage limit per game stats.

Danny Green+ Patty Mills will cost ~12m a year.
Klay will cost ~16m a year.

So Patty and Danny give greater per minute value(by RPM), more minutes per game, and will probably cost less(in total) than Klay.

http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/RPM/position/2

2013-14 Real Plus-Minus - Shooting Guards?


Tbh, I don't think RPM is even useful for comparing players playing in different roles on their teams. It overrates the impact that high productivity-low minutes guys have-- especially on defense. We know that it's really rare for a perimeter player to be a #1-2 option on offense, play consistently high level defense, and play over 30 minutes a game. If you sort out the DRPM by SG you'll see that other than Iggy, every other high DRPM defender plays sub 30 minutes a game.

So you can't really tell who the better defender is by only looking at DRPM when guys aren't used in the same way on their teams. Klay Thompson is a bit more than a 3 and D guy on the Warriors.

jimbo
10-22-2014, 06:37 PM
What is surprising imo is that those stats easily point to Patty being the best backup PG in the NBA. Like very easily.

He's got the highest WAR out of any backup PG and even has a higher WAR than a few starters. (Bledsoe was one of the big names)

I thought this might just point out that San Antonio's backup PG is much better than the replacement (league average player) because of the system, so I looked at the estimated wins added between Neal and Mills.

'13-'14 Mills: 5.9
11'-12' Neal: 2.0

Mills' minutes went from 11.3 in 12-13 to 18.9 in 13-14, but his EWA rose from 1 to 5.9. That's ridiculous.

Juggity
10-22-2014, 10:54 PM
Thompson is a glorified Danny Green

:tu exactly. Thompson's shooting and offensive game is more developed than Green's, but his defense is a pale imitation of Danny's. DG has a history of shutting down SGs and PGs in big moments, which is a recipe for playoff success. Thinking specifically about how he completely changed the dynamic of the spurs-warriors series in 2013. The spurs need elite defense more than elite offense. Klay is a decent defender, but he's not on Danny Green's level in that respect tbh.

I wouldn't trade Klay for Green straight up. Trading Mills and Green for Klay is honestly madness. You'd have to hate the spurs to even propose that trade. In no way does it benefit the spurs.

look_at_g_shred
10-22-2014, 11:22 PM
One of the best two way guards, and elite shooters for an overrated defender :lol sure just trade away the two pieces who've helped you win a championship for the first time in 7 years. Bravo.

Bill_Brasky
10-23-2014, 01:44 PM
op.....you really are a retard.

timtonymanu
10-23-2014, 02:23 PM
OP thinks Cam Newton is a franchise QB. That should tell you everything you need to know.

Also thinks LeBron = TMac :lol

Beaverfuzz
10-23-2014, 02:55 PM
Warriors get: Danny Green, Patty Mills

Spurs get: Klay Thompson

Fuck no, Klay is overrated.

Mouth is Bleeding
11-06-2014, 11:20 PM
reading this thread...

ha
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
hahahahaha
hahahahahaha

love danny (and patty) but

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/194/001.jpg

Daniel Sedin
11-07-2014, 03:05 PM
reading this thread...

ha
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
hahahahaha
hahahahahaha

love danny (and patty) but

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/194/001.jpg

:lol

Malik Hairston
11-07-2014, 03:34 PM
Trading for Klay Thompson's 17.5 per year contract would be foolish, obviously..

Only stupid NBA fans take Thompson's 4-game sample size in this year's regular season games vs. his previous 300-game sample size where he was a glorified 3&D guy and massive playoff choker:lol..

Man, I hate NBA fans and their over-analyzing of meaningless games..

Hoops Czar
11-07-2014, 03:48 PM
Trading for Klay Thompson's 17.5 per year contract would be foolish, obviously..

Only stupid NBA fans take Thompson's 4-game sample size in this year's regular season games vs. his previous 300-game sample size where he was a glorified 3&D guy and massive playoff choker:lol..

Man, I hate NBA fans and their over-analyzing of meaningless games..

Games aren't meaningless to players, only to fans with a played out schtick about meaningless games. Yet, in a stacked western conference, two or three games could make the difference between a one seed and a four seed. Oh, but the Spurs don't need home court advantage you say. Tel that to the 2012 and 2013 Spurs. Btw, SSS not withstanding, when Green gets his $12 to $15 Million in the offseason, Klay's contract won't look so bad.

Malik Hairston
11-07-2014, 03:51 PM
Games aren't meaningless to players, only to fans with a played out schtick about meaningless games. Yet, in a stacked western conference, two or three games could make the difference between a one seed and a four seed. Oh, but the Spurs don't need home court advantage you say. Tel that to the 2012 and 2013 Spurs. Btw, SSS not withstanding, when Green gets his $12 to $15 Million in the offseason, Klay's contract won't look so bad.

It's tough to take you seriously when you have spent the past 2-3 years over-analyzing meaningless games..I don't think I have ever seen a poster make more statements based on meaningless games than you have the past 2-3 years..

You're the same poster that said the Spurs had no chance at winning a title the past 2 years, based on their regular season performance, and in 2013 you even put them on the same level as the fucking Denver Nuggets:lmao(based on the regular season)..

Not to mention downplaying Miami every year due to their regular season flaws..

You should probably stop watching regular season games for the sake of your takes, tbh..

Hoops Czar
11-07-2014, 04:14 PM
It's tough to take you seriously when you have spent the past 2-3 years over-analyzing meaningless games..I don't think I have ever seen a poster make more statements based on meaningless games than you have the past 2-3 years..

You're the same poster that said the Spurs had no chance at winning a title the past 2 years, based on their regular season performance, and in 2013 you even put them on the same level as the fucking Denver Nuggets:lmao(based on the regular season)..

Not to mention downplaying Miami every year due to their regular season flaws..

You should probably stop watching regular season games for the sake of your takes, tbh..

That's alright Harlem, I've never taken you seriously. I think your apolishit troll account has better takes and more fan appeal. At least, that account is good comedy relief. I think you should go back to using that one, tbh. I actually put up with your ignorant RJ and Malik Hairston for years.... "Malik Hairston is going to be the next Vince Carter." :lmao Well, at least we know the origin of the Malik Hairston troll account.

:lmao You're the same poster that said the Spurs were done after the 2011 and Duncan should retire because he couldn't get up and down the court anymore so to you, I say, to each his own.

What happened to your Miami fandom? Oh that's right, your boy left you in the cold and your sources left you in the dark. Do you and Chris Brossard share the same sources?

Cry Havoc
11-07-2014, 04:17 PM
:lmao You're the same poster that said the Spurs were done after the 2011 and Duncan should retire because he couldn't get up and down the court anymore so to you, I say, to each his own.

Everyone was saying that. Tony fucking Parker said that our window had closed. Huge difference there and bailing on our team in the past 2 seasons like every other regular season idiot on this forum.

Malik Hairston
11-07-2014, 04:18 PM
That's alright Harlem, I've never taken you seriously. I think your apolishit troll account has better takes and more fan appeal. At least, that account is good comedy relief. I think you should go back to using that one, tbh. I actually put up with your ignorant RJ and Malik Hairston for years.... "Malik Hairston is going to be the next Vince Carter." :lmao Well, at least we know the origin of the Malik Hairston troll account.

:lmao You're the same poster that said the Spurs were done after the 2011 and Duncan should retire because he couldn't get up and down the court anymore so to you, I say, to each his own.

What happened to your Miami famdon? Oh that's right, your man left you in the cold and your sources left you in the dark.

What an awful rebuttal:lol..

The only thing semi-accurate that you wrote is that I thought the Spurs were done after Phoenix beat them in 2010, which was echoed by most people, including Tony Parker..that's the best you could come up with in an hour? :lol..

Malik Hairston
11-07-2014, 04:22 PM
Everyone was saying that. Tony fucking Parker said that our window had closed. Huge difference there and bailing on our team in the past 2 seasons like every other regular season idiot on this forum.

Hoops Czar is worse than every other "regular season" idiot, tbh, just look up his posts, I've bumped them many times..

He does this every year, tbh..he runs his mouth all regular season about the Spurs, then disappears once the Spurs are deep in the playoffs:lol..

Hoops Czar
11-07-2014, 04:32 PM
What an awful rebuttal:lol..

The only thing semi-accurate that you wrote is that I thought the Spurs were done after Phoenix beat them in 2010, which was echoed by most people, including Tony Parker..that's the best you could come up with in 2 hours? :lol..

I don't sit on an internet message board waiting for replies from ignorant internet clowns who coincidentally, couldn't even address the original comment posted .:lmao Are you sure you're playing with a full deck Harlem? I, along with half the forum said the Spurs weren't going to win last year without HCA, not that they couldn't win. I said nothing in 2012 but, it's nice for you to make things up. Most of your narratives come complete with fabrications and lies so It's my fault for not expecting this in advance.

BTW, you said Duncan was done after the Suns series and the Spurs were done after the Memphis series. Selective amnesia?

"You probably won't find the footage of Hairston's 3 consecutive plays of shutting down Lebron, since word is that Nike stole the footage.":lmao

Hoops Czar
11-07-2014, 04:36 PM
Hoops Czar is worse than every other "regular season" idiot, tbh, just look up his posts, I've bumped them many times..

He does this every year, tbh..he runs his mouth all regular season about the Spurs, then disappears once the Spurs are deep in the playoffs:lol..

I don't mind getting scoffed at by Spurs fans, but the day I get heckled by a Miami/Cleveland fan who's pretending to be a Spurs fan to save face on the Spurs forum after getting run off of realGM......:lmao

Malik Hairston
11-07-2014, 06:07 PM
I don't sit on an internet message board waiting for replies from ignorant internet clowns who coincidentally, couldn't even address the original comment posted .:lmao Are you sure you're playing with a full deck Harlem? I, along with half the forum said the Spurs weren't going to win last year without HCA, not that they couldn't win. I said nothing in 2012 but, it's nice for you to make things up. Most of your narratives come complete with fabrications and lies so It's my fault for not expecting this in advance.

BTW, you said Duncan was done after the Suns series and the Spurs were done after the Memphis series. Selective amnesia?

"You probably won't find the footage of Hairston's 3 consecutive plays of shutting down Lebron, since word is that Nike stole the footage.":lmao

Do you really want me to bump all your posts from the last 2 years again?..You literally repeated that the Spurs don't have a chance at the title, it had nothing to do with HCA..I'm not the only one that knows your history, your takes have been bumped by several posters, ask Elnono:lol..your Heat takes were nearly as bad as your Spurs takes..

And it's pretty telling that you have to go back 4-5 years to find any ammo against me, albeit very weak ammo:lol..

I don't remember saying Duncan was done after the Suns series, btw, I would need you to provide a link, but it's a fair point, since he literally changed his entire style of play the following year, you moron..

Hoops Czar
11-07-2014, 06:45 PM
Do you really want me to bump all your posts from the last 2 years again?..You literally repeated that the Spurs don't have a chance at the title, it had nothing to do with HCA..I'm not the only one that knows your history, your takes have been bumped by several posters, ask Elnono:lol..your Heat takes were nearly as bad as your Spurs takes..

And it's pretty telling that you have to go back 4-5 years to find any ammo against me, albeit very weak ammo:lol..

I don't remember saying Duncan was done after the Suns series, btw, I would need you to provide a link, but it's a fair point, since he literally changed his entire style of play the following year, you moron..


I don't care about my takes and the fact that you do is even more worrisome. This is a message board full of expression and opinion so it's not to be taken that seriously. If you think I give a rat's ass about what I said two or three years ago before the fact, you're sadly mistaken. I could go back and post all your silly takes dating back to '09. Oh wait, I should have stated that in the form of a question. Do you want me to? Just ask Koolaid man's brother.:lmao He'll tell ya!!! No take on the planet will ever top Harlem "bigwig" hiding behind fictional sources, telling everybody who'd listen, Lebron is staying in Miami.

What's even more troubling is that you DO care what people say and think of you and that's why you go through great lengths to defend yourself.

I never even loaded my gun Harlem and I wasn't aware there was a statute of limitations on internet posts. I could have gone in an entirely different direction if you know what I mean but, I chose to take the high road and stick to basketball. Btw, My Heat takes were bullshit, intended only to get under a converted Heat fans skin. Apparently, it worked in spades.

If I had the time of day, I could launch an internet book entitled "Harlem's takes". I just have a life and don't really care. To your last point, giving up on the greatest power forward of all-time was pretty dumb. He made you look like a chicken.

Oh, and nobody really knows my history Harlem but, I know yours inside out. For you see, I lived through your drek years under a different username. Tell me, how old were you when everytime I badmouthed RJ, you posted this....:married:

ElNono
11-07-2014, 07:44 PM
sometimes you gotta take the L and charge it to da game, tbh... it's ok, we know :lol

N0 LyF3 ScRuB
01-24-2015, 11:35 AM
:lol 37 points in one quarter
:lol ST

hater
01-24-2015, 11:37 AM
overrated scrub tbh

no deal

RD2191
01-24-2015, 11:46 AM
overrated scrub tbh

no deal

scanry
01-24-2015, 11:56 AM
Fuck Kerr

apalisoc_9
01-24-2015, 12:01 PM
Regular season fans...

They never learn.

:lol

N0 LyF3 ScRuB
01-24-2015, 12:03 PM
Regular season fans...

They never learn.

:lol

Why do you still post after you get curb stomped regularly?

jeebus
01-24-2015, 12:08 PM
lol a fluke quarter then bumping this shit thread

apalisoc_9
01-24-2015, 12:17 PM
Regular season fans...

:lol

N0 LyF3 ScRuB
01-24-2015, 12:48 PM
lol a fluke quarter then bumping this shit thread
At which shot did it become a fluke?

Clipper Nation
01-24-2015, 01:14 PM
Regular season fans...

:lol

:lol Seriously, Klay is a gigantic playoff choker. But but he had a fluky quarter against a lottery-bound Kings team in January, he must be the GOAT!!!

Leetonidas
01-24-2015, 01:18 PM
Mo Williams dropped 52 this season as well.

Terrence Ross scored 50 last season.

Andre Miller had a 50 point game fairly recently.


Scrubs go off for 50 every year for some reason. also inb4 "Parker vs. T-Wolves" comments

Seventyniner
01-24-2015, 02:12 PM
:lol 37 points in one quarter
:lol ST

:cry RIP Gervin

Cry Havoc
01-24-2015, 02:49 PM
Regular season fans...

They never learn.

:lol

So I guess your orgasms over regular season games from Kawhi are just as stupid, right?

timtonymanu
01-24-2015, 03:34 PM
Of course fail at lyfe scrub was going to bump this.

:lmao regular season fans

timtonymanu
01-24-2015, 03:34 PM
:lol 37 points in one quarter
:lol ST

Still wouldn't take him straight up for Green and Patty.

Legacy
01-24-2015, 03:43 PM
So I guess your orgasms over regular season games from Kawhi are just as stupid, right?

NNnooooo. CH, did you switch teams on us, tbh? :cry

Cry Havoc
01-24-2015, 04:32 PM
NNnooooo. CH, did you switch teams on us, tbh? :cry

Not sure I follow.

dabom
01-24-2015, 05:45 PM
Danny green has the most threes in a finals.

benefactor
01-24-2015, 06:31 PM
:lol 37 points in one quarter
:lol ST
Yep...let's pay both Leonard and Thompson max deals, so the Spurs can fill the roster out with shit and get bounced in the second round every year.

Brunodf
01-24-2015, 07:04 PM
Still wouldn't take him straight up for Green and Patty.
This.

Malik Hairston
01-24-2015, 09:13 PM
:lol paying 17 mil for Peja Stojakovic

100%duncan
01-24-2015, 09:39 PM
Of course fail at lyfe scrub was going to bump this.

:lmao regular season fans

:lmao

Nathan89
01-24-2015, 09:42 PM
:lol paying 17 mil for Peja Stojakovic

Worth every penny if they can get a ring this year. Could hurt them if they have to let others walk.

Mel_13
01-24-2015, 09:44 PM
Worth every penny if they can get a ring this year. Could hurt them if they have to let others walk.

He was going to be on the team anyway, the extension starts next season.

Malik Hairston
01-24-2015, 09:47 PM
Worth every penny if they can get a ring this year. Could hurt them if they have to let others walk.

His extension didn't kick in this year IIRC, they're probably going to lose Green(their 2nd most important player IMO) this off-season, and we'll see about Barnes/Iguodala..

spurraider21
01-24-2015, 10:06 PM
So I guess your orgasms over regular season games from Kawhi are just as stupid, right?
kawhi's best performances have been in the Finals during the last 2 years though :lol

spurraider21
01-24-2015, 10:08 PM
:lol paying 17 mil for Peja Stojakovic
Peja was actually a better passer than Klay, too. But Thompson is an above average defender and athlete at the SG position right now, while Peja was always hidden on defense.

Legacy
01-25-2015, 02:46 AM
Not sure I follow.

You get so sensitive when Spurs fans clown on anything GS. Are you a fan of both teams?

Malik Hairston
01-25-2015, 02:54 AM
You get so sensitive when Spurs fans clown on anything GS. Are you a fan of both teams?

Everybody loves Golden State, tbh, it has been the case for years..

If you recall the Warriors-Spurs series in 2013, virtually every single person in the media, including the announcers, was openly cheering for the Warriors:lol..

Their players are constantly overrated, too, see: Harrison Barnes being labeled a potential superstar after having a good series vs. the Spurs where Pop was guarding him with 6-foot 3 Gary Neal and 6-foot-1 Tony Parker..

They are that "fun", "likeable" team with the "good guy" image and the "best fans in the NBA"..

Legacy
01-25-2015, 03:06 AM
Yeah, but he gets really, really sensitive. I think he's from the Bay area, too, which makes sense in a way. I love watching GS play just as much as anybody, but my Spurs always come first obviously. I'll admit that I'm a big fan of Steph-- not so much Klay...

OOps. Forgot to quote you.

apalisoc_9
01-25-2015, 03:29 AM
Yeah, but he gets really, really sensitive. I think he's from the Bay area, too, which makes sense in a way. I love watching GS play just as much as anybody, but my Spurs always come first obviously. I'll admit that I'm a big fan of Steph-- not so much Klay...

OOps. Forgot to quote you.

Guy has always been a mainstream fan..

Texas_Ranger
01-25-2015, 07:52 AM
Seems like a good trade, but the Warriors aint stupid and would never do it.

And LOL if anyone really thinks Green or Mills are better than Klay.

exstatic
01-25-2015, 09:18 AM
Seems like a good trade, but the Warriors aint stupid and would never do it.

And LOL if anyone really thinks Green or Mills are better than Klay.

Ah, but the trade isn't Green or Mills, it's Green and Mills, 25% of the playoff rotation. There are also cap implications to paying big money to two wing players, which we would have to do if we got Klay. I'd rather have two pieces that can give you 85% of Klay's production for probably 65% of his salary next year.

Cry Havoc
01-25-2015, 09:21 PM
Yeah, but he gets really, really sensitive. I think he's from the Bay area, too, which makes sense in a way. I love watching GS play just as much as anybody, but my Spurs always come first obviously. I'll admit that I'm a big fan of Steph-- not so much Klay...

OOps. Forgot to quote you.

Call it sensitive if you want, I just think the anti-hype circlejerk that goes on here is stupid and way overboard at times, and has a habit of making this forum practically unreadable. LOL threads after every loss, ironic or not, hate threads whenever a specific hyped player has a bad game, it just gets exhaustive and pointless to read. I like the Warriors but I don't really feel the need to defend them as much as I feel the need to call some people out on Spurstalk for having terrible takes.

Spurstalk DOES do a good job of chilling a lot of undeserved hype, but they take it overboard. Everything here has to have that edge, and it sucks.

timtonymanu
01-25-2015, 09:24 PM
Unless Klay can prove in the playoffs that he isn't a choker, I won't buy into his game. Of course, he's a better player individually than both of those guys, but in the playoffs, I would rather have Danny and Patty.

benefactor
01-31-2015, 08:35 AM
Nice game last night.

:lol one quarter wonder

TVI
01-31-2015, 12:57 PM
Nice game last night.

:lol one quarter wonder

(-14) against the Jazz. Shows you why you shouldn't knee jerk over one unbelievable quarter.