PDA

View Full Version : Good article on shooting


Tuddy
10-25-2014, 07:40 PM
http://hoopshype.com/columns/david-nurse/shooting-the-key-ingredient-to-championships

Sorry if already posted
ElNono
10-25-2014, 07:55 PM
good read, thanks :tu
littlecoyotecoin
10-25-2014, 07:59 PM
Nice article. Thanks for posting.
lefty
10-25-2014, 09:36 PM
Some teams have figured that out. Others, well, not so much. (Lakers fans, you might want to stop reading here.

:lmao
barbacoataco
10-25-2014, 10:22 PM
What everyone forgets is that shooting % is both the ability to make shots, and to get open shots.

Sone teams shoot a good % in the reg season but in the playoffs they can't get open looks and their % goes down.

Anyone who's ever seen Matt bonner shoot in warm ups knows that he can hit 90% or even higher with no defensive pressure, but in a real game is totally different

Chip has to get credit for everything he's done for this team.
littlecoyotecoin
10-25-2014, 10:29 PM
What everyone forgets is that shooting % is both the ability to make shots, and to get open shots.

Sone teams shoot a good % in the reg season but in the playoffs they can't get open looks and their % goes down.

Anyone who's ever seen Matt bonner shoot in warm ups knows that he can hit 90% or even higher with no defensive pressure, but in a real game is totally different

Chip has to get credit for everything he's done for this team.

You're right. Sonetimes I forgegg about that. But, since eggeryone does, I dome feel too bagg about meyeself. Eggeryone makes mistakes Known and eggain.

You have to gegg open to megg an open shot. Bonner still 41+% for his career in all those "fake games".
exstatic
10-25-2014, 10:37 PM
You're right. Sonetimes I forgegg about that. But, since eggeryone does, I dome feel too bagg about meyeself. Eggeryone makes mistakes Known and eggain.

You have to gegg open to megg an open shot. Bonner still 41+% for his career in all those "fake games".

I hope you were posting from a phone.
littlecoyotecoin
10-25-2014, 10:57 PM
Yeah. That, too. BTW, Good work on the Ayers front. The hyperbole over Baynes' greatness and torches and pitchforks over Ayers' existence was in far too much disparity, if not totally misdirected. Baynes does not look good, but at least we paid double.