PDA

View Full Version : Dang...WTI crude below $65 today



CosmicCowboy
12-08-2014, 09:57 AM
The Eagleford Shale boom is gonna take a huge dump just like the Saudi's planned...it is just unsustainable at this price point.

baseline bum
12-08-2014, 10:13 AM
The Eagleford Shale boom is gonna take a huge dump just like the Saudi's planned...it is just unsustainable at this price point.

Really? I thought they had gotten shale to be profitable as long as oil was above $40-$45 a barrel. Or am I thinking the Canadian oil sands extraction?

CosmicCowboy
12-08-2014, 10:17 AM
Really? I thought they had gotten shale to be profitable as long as oil was above $40-$45 a barrel. Or am I thinking the Canadian oil sands extraction?

I have heard that $40 number in the press but I'm pretty sure that is bullshit. I have heard $60 from guys in the industry...and oil sands are closer to $80 break even.

baseline bum
12-08-2014, 11:45 AM
I have heard that $40 number in the press but I'm pretty sure that is bullshit. I have heard $60 from guys in the industry...and oil sands are closer to $80 break even.

We definitely can't afford to have OPEC kill this industry off, especially since Saudi Arabia doesn't sound like it has a ton of cheap oil to extract anymore. But damn, it could be expensive to save when Saudi Arabia can extract their oil for something like $3-$5 a barrel.

TeyshaBlue
12-08-2014, 11:53 AM
Drill here drill now tbh.

CosmicCowboy
12-08-2014, 12:04 PM
We definitely can't afford to have OPEC kill this industry off, especially since Saudi Arabia doesn't sound like it has a ton of cheap oil to extract anymore. But damn, it could be expensive to save when Saudi Arabia can extract their oil for something like $3-$5 a barrel.

The Saudi's can only play for a couple of years, though...even though their cost of extraction is low they spend a fortune on social services to keep the natives in check so they don't overthrow the monarchy...with oil prices lox they start burning through their savings like crazy...

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 12:04 PM
if this keeps up, lots of frackers gonna fold, leaving taxpayers with their superfund lakes of toxic shit. as always, private gain, public risk (financial and health).

ElNono
12-08-2014, 12:43 PM
So do you subsidize fracking for the time being until prices normalize, like we do for farming to secure a food supply?

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 12:55 PM
So do you subsidize fracking for the time being until prices normalize, like we do for farming to secure a food supply?

you subsize, promote energy efficiency, extend/expand wind PTC for 20 years, extend/expand residential solar tax credit for 20 years, etc, etc, etc. you also define coal ash as hazmat and force BigCoal to clean up their shit.

frackers make and shit their bed, let them lie in it.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if BigOil is conspiring/encouraging OPEC to keep pumping to keep gas/diesel low so the oncoming onslaught non-carbon autos is delayed for years.

There is precedent: BigAuto and BigOil and BigAirline have mostly killed public transport and (highspeed) rail nationwide.

ElNono
12-08-2014, 01:01 PM
you subsize, promote energy efficiency, extend/expand wind PTC for 20 years, extend/expand residential solar tax credit for 20 years, etc, etc, etc. you also define coal ash as hazmat and force BigCoal to clean up their shit.

frackers make and shit their bed, let them lie in it.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if BigOil is conspiring/encouraging OPEC to keep pumping to keep gas/diesel low so the oncoming onslaught non-carbon autos is delayed for years.

There is precedent: BigAuto and BigOil and BigAirline have mostly killed public transport and (highspeed) rail nationwide.

Don't really care about all that.

It's obvious this is working also as a geopolitical tool against Russia. What gives me pause about subsidizing is that I know eventually prices will normalize and we're going to go back to high oil prices based on what the market can pay as opposed to demand, at which point the subsidies wouldn't be necessary anymore, but I'm not so sure they would go away.

CosmicCowboy
12-08-2014, 01:36 PM
Mainly this will just shut down new drilling and the jobs that go with it. The holes that are already punched will continue to produce oil and gas.

cantthinkofanything
12-08-2014, 01:51 PM
I have heard that $40 number in the press but I'm pretty sure that is bullshit. I have heard $60 from guys in the industry...and oil sands are closer to $80 break even.

I believe the $40 number pertains to the fairway of the play. Cheap oil probably hurts some of the smaller companies that took up positions on the fringes and won't have the rates or cums that compare to the sweet spots. The bigger companies will focus on their core areas and leave the other stuff for later or let the leases expire. Also, drilling costs and service prices will come down as well.

TeyshaBlue
12-08-2014, 02:14 PM
So do you subsidize fracking for the time being until prices normalize, like we do for farming to secure a food supply?

No. Boom/Bust is price of doing business.

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 02:15 PM
Don't really care about all that.

It's obvious this is working also as a geopolitical tool against Russia. What gives me pause about subsidizing is that I know eventually prices will normalize and we're going to go back to high oil prices based on what the market can pay as opposed to demand, at which point the subsidies wouldn't be necessary anymore, but I'm not so sure they would go away.

flyers are subsidizing airlines' "unusually high fuel costs" with $Bs in "fees" which haven't come down.

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 02:20 PM
fracking was originally about natgas, IIRC, and the surfeit of oil was a surprise freebie.

All the auto mfrs are developing FCVs for release in the next couple years, while hybrids have flatlined.

There so much hyper promising research around fuel cells,cheaper, long-lasting catalysts and hydrogen production that one, or more, or many, will be "transformative".

yes, the price of oil has little to with mismatch of demand/supply, but you won't hear right-wing "free market" assholes bitching about corrupt, rigged commodities markets.

Yonivore
12-08-2014, 03:08 PM
The Finite World (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/27/opinion/27krugman.html)

Published: December 26, 2010


Oil is back above $90 a barrel. Copper and cotton have hit record highs. Wheat and corn prices are way up. Over all, world commodity prices have risen by a quarter in the past six months.

So what’s the meaning of this surge?

Is it speculation run amok? Is it the result of excessive money creation, a harbinger of runaway inflation just around the corner? No and no.

What the commodity markets are telling us is that we’re living in a finite world, in which the rapid growth of emerging economies is placing pressure on limited supplies of raw materials, pushing up their prices. And America is, for the most part, just a bystander in this story
...
Conventional oil production has been flat for four years; in that sense, at least, peak oil has arrived.
:lmao

I remember all the Krugman acolytes in here.

TeyshaBlue
12-08-2014, 03:14 PM
fracking was originally about natgas, IIRC, and the surfeit of oil was a surprise freebie.

All the auto mfrs are developing FCVs for release in the next couple years, while hybrids have flatlined.

There so much hyper promising research around fuel cells,cheaper, long-lasting catalysts and hydrogen production that one, or more, or many, will be "transformative".

yes, the price of oil has little to with mismatch of demand/supply, but you won't hear right-wing "free market" assholes bitching about corrupt, rigged commodities markets.

We've been fracking oil formations for decades.

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 03:22 PM
We've been fracking oil formations for decades.

yes, but it was the NatGas supply from hydraulic fracking that seemed to be what everybody was excited about in the 2000s, with the oil a secondary product. And the big problem seemed to be insufficient gas pipelines, not insufficient oil pipelines.

the fact the fracking in USA is now the dominant technique proves "easy, cheap oil" is over, and the Red Queen rules.

the evil, criminal Halliburton dickhead knew exactly what he was doing exempting fracking from the Clean Water Act.

CosmicCowboy
12-08-2014, 03:22 PM
We've been fracking oil formations for decades.

Yep. It is the combination of fracking and horizontal drilling that is relatively new.

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 03:25 PM
Today’s hydraulic fracturing technologies can trace their roots to April 25, 1865, when Civil War veteran Col. Edward A. L. Roberts received the first of his many patents for an “exploding torpedo.”

http://aoghs.org/technology/hydraulic-fracturing/

boutons_deux
12-08-2014, 03:41 PM
Oil prices may delay Oklahoma income tax cut (http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/12/08/oil-prices-may-delay-oklahoma-income-tax-cut/)

Declining oil prices could cost Oklahoma residents an income tax cut in 2016.

A law signed in April by Gov. Mary Fallin requires for the cut to take effect an increase in state revenue, provided in part by tax collections that rise and fall with oil prices.

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/12/08/oil-prices-may-delay-oklahoma-income-tax-cut/

Nbadan
12-08-2014, 05:36 PM
The Finite World (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/27/opinion/27krugman.html)

Published: December 26, 2010


:lmao

I remember all the Krugman acolytes in here.

This price drop does nothing to dis-spell the peak oil theory....cheap oil is a finite supply...the oil from fracking will only get costlier and costlier...besides its a given that shale oil producers have vastly overestimated the amount of their own reserves...

TeyshaBlue
12-08-2014, 07:48 PM
A given?

Winehole23
12-08-2014, 07:57 PM
So do you subsidize fracking for the time being until prices normalize, like we do for farming to secure a food supply?tangentially relevant: middlemen used derivatives to lock in high prices

http://www.strategicrelocationblog.com/blog/falling-oil-prices-boom-or-bust

pgardn
12-08-2014, 09:10 PM
tangentially relevant: middlemen used derivatives to lock in high prices

http://www.strategicrelocationblog.com/blog/falling-oil-prices-boom-or-bust

Boots, did you read the above. Lots of ammo for you.

All oil companies inflate their cost of production figures through various accounting tricks to hide massive profits and to evade taxes, so the real cost of production is never as high as the stated costs.

boutons_deux
12-09-2014, 06:08 AM
An oilco exec testified in Congress that about 30% of the oil price was due to speculators who never take delivery.

elbamba
12-09-2014, 11:33 AM
I have heard that $40 number in the press but I'm pretty sure that is bullshit. I have heard $60 from guys in the industry...and oil sands are closer to $80 break even.

Most of the people I talk to in the industry are not worried about the Eagle Ford as much as the Permian.

boutons_deux
12-09-2014, 12:21 PM
http://images.bwbx.io/cms/2014-11-25/Screen-Shot-2014-11-25-at-12.11.09-PM.png

FuzzyLumpkins
12-09-2014, 12:30 PM
The Finite World (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/27/opinion/27krugman.html)

Published: December 26, 2010


:lmao

I remember all the Krugman acolytes in here.

No. And quite frankly, you calling people acolytes as you use google, GOP mailers, and confirmation bias is hilarious.

boutons_deux
12-09-2014, 12:44 PM
I remember all the Krugman acolytes in here.

He's more right on more issues that you will ever be

cheap oil peak is well past

that's why BigOil runs with the Red Queen fracking (expensive, highly leveraged)

that's why BigOil is trying to drill in the Arctic, and at 20K+ feet down in the ocean (super expensive, super risky)

spurraider21
12-09-2014, 05:50 PM
i dont care whats going on. as long as gas is cheap, im happy. and i dont care if that makes me a simpleton

ElNono
12-09-2014, 05:59 PM
Liking cheap gas doesn't make you a simpleton, tbh, it makes you a Big-Oil rabble rouser apologist that likes to get raped by the Big Corps while Lassie no longer has a park to defecate into.

I saaaaaaiiiiddddd....

CosmicCowboy
12-10-2014, 09:03 AM
Liking cheap gas doesn't make you a simpleton, tbh, it makes you a Big-Oil rabble rouser apologist that likes to get raped by the Big Corps while Lassie no longer has a park to defecate into.

I saaaaaaiiiiddddd....

:lmao

boutons_deux
12-10-2014, 09:34 AM
pocket change, but anyway

BP sees $1 billion in restructuring charges as oil falls (http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/12/10/bp-sees-1-billion-in-restructuring-charges-as-oil-falls/)
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/12/10/bp-sees-1-billion-in-restructuring-charges-as-oil-falls/


bigger is that SCOTUS said BP has to pay many $Bs more for fucking up the still-fucked-up Gulf

CosmicCowboy
12-12-2014, 07:58 AM
WTI $58.50

Damn. How low can it go?

Gonna be a lot of jacked up pickups repossessed in Texas next year.

Drachen
12-12-2014, 08:26 AM
If the Saudis are truly trying to crush the fracking industry, I think it will take more time (though not much lower of a price).

CosmicCowboy
12-12-2014, 08:38 AM
If the Saudis are truly trying to crush the fracking industry, I think it will take more time (though not much lower of a price).

Naturally it is complicated with individual contracts between oilcos and landowners as far as how long they have to drill before drilling rights run out, but those drilling rigs are mobile and can be parked any time it is no longer feasible to drill. The market can make a 180 degree turn in a matter of weeks as wells get completed and new ones postponed and high paid oil field hands get laid off by the thousands. Naturally Bouton's celebrates all these nasty oil field folks losing their jobs.

boutons_deux
12-12-2014, 09:21 AM
jobs in wind and solar more reliable, less risky than oil field work. And there are more of them in more states.

CosmicCowboy
12-12-2014, 09:24 AM
jobs in wind and solar more reliable, less risky than oil field work. And there are more of them in more states.

$58 dollar oil means fewer wind and solar jobs, dumbass.

boutons_deux
12-12-2014, 09:27 AM
$58 dollar oil means fewer wind and solar jobs, dumbass.

dumbass, BigCarbon killing wind PTC is more dramatic, BigCarbon killing Federal tax write-off for distributed solar is more dramatic.

CosmicCowboy
12-12-2014, 09:29 AM
Hey dumbass. Wind and Solar needed subsidies at $100 oil to be viable. How many subsidies do you thing they need now?

And don't forget I am a solar consumer because the cost plus subsidies made economic sense to me.

CosmicCowboy
12-12-2014, 09:33 AM
With carbon energy half off, subsidies need to double to get the same feasibility.

boutons_deux
12-12-2014, 09:36 AM
With carbon energy half off, subsidies need to double to get the same feasibility.

then do it, and raise the tax (carbon tax) on gas/diesel to finance road/bridge maintenance and reduce carbon fuel consumption.

Drachen
12-12-2014, 09:37 AM
I just saw a post by Steve Brown that a 6kw system is now only 8k with subsidies. I need a new roof first, but I really want to do this.

pgardn
12-12-2014, 09:42 AM
Liking cheap gas doesn't make you a simpleton, tbh, it makes you a Big-Oil rabble rouser apologist that likes to get raped by the Big Corps while Lassie no longer has a park to defecate into.

I saaaaaaiiiiddddd....

People from NJ are not supposed to be funny?

pgardn
12-12-2014, 09:48 AM
I just saw a post by Steve Brown that a 6kw system is now only 8k with subsidies. I need a new roof first, but I really want to do this.

I wanna big ole wind turbine.
The neighbors don't want me to have one.

Just to play with. Got to much shade for solar.