Oh, the irony...

[Yonivore]

Black Crime Claims Life of Apologist for Black Crime (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me.html)


Ruenzel was writing about white privilege for the Southern Poverty Law Center as far back as 1997 — long before it became the rage at college campuses, newsrooms, churches, high schools and even grade schools.

By the time of his death, Ruenzel had accumulated many of the trappings of the white privilege he exposed: The job. The home. The intact family. And most importantly in his case, white privilege endowed Ruenzel with an expectation of safety in the Oakland neighborhood where last week two black people are suspected of killing him.

[boutons_deux]

so black who bitches about white (male) privilege should not achieve a white (mile) lifestyle?

the only good n!gg@ is a poor n!gg@, right?

[Yonivore]

so black who bitches about white (male) privilege should not achieve a white (mile) lifestyle?

the only good n!gg@ is a poor n!gg@, right?
You're not making any sense, as usual.

[boutons_deux]

ah, ok, DR was white, so he's being trashed by white supremacist conservative racist "American Thinker" for writing about white male privilege and for SPLC?

so it's white librulls who ENABLE and defend black violence? really? All white libruls? most? a few? any?

otoh, white conservatives, Fox defend, enable, promote Bundy, who LIED about his family's property owndership, and Bundy's violent, gun-totin, ready-to-shoot, aimed-at-govt-officials, self-annointed Defenders Of The Constitution. Many Repugs and conservatives are fucking wondering if The Republic can exist for 2 more years under that Obama n!gg@, talking about violence, uprising, etc.

[Yonivore]

ah, ok, DR was white, so he's being trashed by white supremacist conservative racist "American Thinker" for writing about white male privilege and for SPLC?

so it's white librulls who ENABLE and defend black violence? really? All white libruls? most? a few? any?

otoh, white conservatives, Fox defend, enable, promote Bundy, who LIED about his family's property owndership, and Bundy's violent, gun-totin, ready-to-shoot, aimed-at-govt-officials, self-annointed Defenders Of The Constitution. Many Repugs and conservatives are fucking wondering if The Republic can exist for 2 more years under that Obama n!gg@, talking about violence, uprising, etc.
I think you misunderstand the article.

It was an article about the irony of a white man, living in a black neighborhood, writing about how white privilege is the cause of black crime, thinking that insulated him from the black crime caused by white privilege, but failing to recognize he, too, was living a life of white privilege, and, finally, in the end, suffering the fate he ascribes to the white privilege he eschewed in his writings.

I'm still not sure what you're talking about but, I wanted to make clear my understanding of the article I posted. Dr. Ruenzel's fate was ironic.

[Spurminator]

Classy post and article.

Not sure why an article dancing on the grave of a writer who supposedly defended black crime and claimed to be safe from it because of his whiteness includes not a single quote from that writer.

But the "American Thinker" website is clearly not for an intellectually curious audience.

[ChumpDumper]

Yoni is really happy about this.

[Yonivore]

Classy post and article.

Not sure why an article dancing on the grave of a writer who supposedly defended black crime and claimed to be safe from it because of his whiteness includes not a single quote from that writer.

But the "American Thinker" website is clearly not for an intellectually curious audience.
Sounds like he did a lot of work for the Southern Poverty Law Center; perhaps an interested person would check it out.

I'm not interested.

[Yonivore]

Yoni is really happy about this.
Nope. Just recognizing the irony.

[ChumpDumper]

Sounds like he did a lot of work for the Southern Poverty Law Center; perhaps an interested person would check it out.

I'm not interested.Your thread. Why should we be interested about any of it then?

[Spurminator]

Nope. Just recognizing the irony.

Neither you nor the author has shown any irony here. All you've done so far is offer smug commentary on a man's death.

[ChumpDumper]

It's a terribly written article with zero quotes from the victim himself illustrated what they are saying about him.

Yoni never heard of this guy before today's email and all I know about him is that white people are happy black guys killed him so they can post about his murder on message boards.

[Yonivore]

Your thread. Why should we be interested about any of it then?
I guess that's a question you'll have to ask yourself being as you're in here engaging it.

[ChumpDumper]

I guess that's a question you'll have to ask yourself being as you're in here engaging it.You aren't even interested in the subject of your post anymore.

That's interesting in itself.

[Yonivore]

Neither you nor the author has shown any irony here. All you've done so far is offer smug commentary on a man's death.
I offered no commentary beyond claiming his death was ironic, which I still maintain.

You know, kind of like the irony of driving an electric car is dirtier than driving a gasoline-powered car, in an area where it is recharged using coal-powered generators.

[ChumpDumper]

I offered no commentary beyond claiming his death was ironic, which I still maintain.According to the article that shows not one example of his work.

Have you read any of his work, yoni?

Did you know this person existed before you got this story, yoni?

[Yonivore]

Your thread. Why should we be interested about any of it then?
You're the one wondering why you're interested.

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Im real happy about it and I cant wait till something like this happens to jewtons or any of the other n¡gger loving libtards on this site. The guy was a gay jew and it happened at a park thats a known meet up site for gay men to have public sex. Which once again proves my theory that all liberal males love n¡gger cock in their ass or n¡gger jizz in their wives pussy that they can clean up.

[ChumpDumper]

You're the one wondering why you're interested.No I asked you why we should be interested when you only wanted to crow about this guy's murder.

[Spurminator]

I offered no commentary beyond claiming his death was ironic, which I still maintain.

...based on no evidence that it was ironic beyond the claims made in an article clearly written for dumb people.

[Yonivore]

...based on no evidence that it was ironic beyond the claims made in an article clearly written for dumb people.
So, you're suggesting the guy wasn't associated with the Southern Poverty Law Center, that he didn't write about black violence being caused by white privilege and that he didn't suffer a fate he justified through his warped sense that white privileged people somehow cause blacks to be violent?

Because THAT's ironic.

[Yonivore]

No I asked you why we should be interested when you only wanted to crow about this guy's murder.
You don't have to be interested.

[ChumpDumper]

You don't have to be interested.No one said anyone had to be anything. You were asked why we should be interested.

[Yonivore]

No one said anyone had to be anything. You were asked why we should be interested.
I don't care if you are, I don't even pretend to believe you should. There are hundreds of other posters in the forum that have demonstrated their disinterest by not posting in the thread. Might I suggest you do the same if you are unable to figure out whether or not you're interested?

[Spurminator]

So, you're suggesting the guy wasn't associated with the Southern Poverty Law Center, that he didn't write about black violence being caused by white privilege and that he didn't suffer a fate he justified through his warped sense that white privileged people somehow cause blacks to be violent?

Because THAT's ironic.

I'm saying I don't know what he wrote because this article didn't quote him... instead quoting other writers they claim had the same views. Why wouldn't they just quote the subject of the story? There's a very big gap between identifying white privilege as a root cause of black violence vs. outright justifying it. If he actually said that violence is justified, I'm sure that quote is available somewhere.

It's as though they believe their audience will just accept (and in some instances share) whatever is spoon fed to them without having the intellectual curiosity to validate what they're reading.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't care if you are, I don't even pretend to believe you should. There are hundreds of other posters in the forum that have demonstrated their disinterest by not posting in the thread. Might I suggest you do the same if you are unable to figure out whether or not you're interested?I told you my interest, which is wondering why your interest doesn't extend beyond drive by gloating over this man's murder.

[Yonivore]

I'm saying I don't know what he wrote because this article didn't quote him... instead quoting other writers they claim had the same views. Why wouldn't they just quote the subject of the story? There's a very big gap between identifying white privilege as a root cause of black violence vs. outright justifying it. If he actually said that violence is justified, I'm sure that quote is available somewhere.

It's as though they believe their audience will just accept (and in some instances share) whatever is spoon fed to them without having the intellectual curiosity to validate what they're reading.
Well, you're welcome to defend his record and clarify for us all, if it bothers you so much.

I'm happy to believe the American Thinker, unlike The Rolling Stone and that ugly nudist from some HBO show, knows the laws concerning libel and that, if they're off the mark, someone more interested than you will step forward and defend Dr. Ruenzel's honor.

Your faux outrage on his behalf is cute, though.

[Yonivore]

I told you my interest, which is wondering why your interest doesn't extend beyond drive by gloating over this man's murder.
I believe it demonstrated a point about the far left and their stupidity. Dr. Ruenzel was an idiot if he believed white privilege was the cause of black violence and he does the world no favor by spewing that stupidity from the Southern Poverty Law Center.

There. That's my interest. Does that change anything for you?

[Spurminator]

Well, you're welcome to defend his record and clarify for us all, if it bothers you so much.

I'm happy to believe the American Thinker, unlike The Rolling Stone and that ugly nudist from some HBO show, knows the laws concerning libel and that, if they're off the mark, someone more interested than you will step forward and defend Dr. Ruenzel's honor.

Your faux outrage on his behalf is cute, though.

Don't be mistaken, I have no interest or outrage over this particular story. I have a general interest in letting people know when articles they share make them look stupid.

[Yonivore]

Don't be mistaken, I have no interest or outrage over this particular story. I have a general interest in letting people know when articles they share make them look stupid.
Yeah, well, don't worry about me. I'll be just fine.

"...general interest in letting people know when article they share..." :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I believe it demonstrated a point about the far left and their stupidity. Dr. Ruenzel was an idiot if he believed white privilege was the cause of black violence and he does the world no favor by spewing that stupidity from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
What is the evidence he said this?

[Th'Pusher]

Yeah, well, don't worry about me. I'll be just fine.

"...general interest in letting people know when article they share..." :lmao

You forgot the make them look stupid part.

[Yonivore]

What is the evidence he said this?
Okay, before I go digging and find these articles, are you going to admit the way he died is ironic if, in fact, I find articles authored by Steve Reunzel that speak about white privilege being the cause of black violence?

Because, if you're just going to move the goal post again, why should I go to the effort?

Frankly, I'm satisfied that it's true and, if not, I'd support a lawsuit againt American Thinker for libel or slander.

I've checked. He was an author for at least one of the Southern Poverty Law Center's publications but, searching his name there doesn't produce any results. All you get is the outrage over the American Thinker article.

I also note his association with the Southern Poverty Law Center isn't mentioned in his obituary. One could speculate on why that is but, why would one?

[ChumpDumper]

Okay, before I go digging and find these articles, are you going to admit the way he died is ironic if, in fact, I find articles authored by Steve Reunzel that speak about white privilege being the cause of black violence?

Because, if you're just going to move the goal post again, why should I go to the effort?

Frankly, I'm satisfied that it's true and, if not, I'd support a lawsuit againt American Thinker for libel or slander.

I've checked. He was an author for at least one of the Southern Poverty Law Center's publications but, searching his name there doesn't produce any results. All you get is the outrage over the American Thinker article.

I also note his association with the Southern Poverty Law Center isn't mentioned in his obituary. One could speculate on why that is but, why would one?All I'm saying is if you and "American Thinker" want to spike the football on this guy's grave, at least have a quote of his you can gloat over.

Shitty article, shitty reason for posting the article.

Shitty.

[Yonivore]

All I'm saying is if you and "American Thinker" want to spike the football on this guy's grave, at least have a quote of his you can gloat over.

Shitty article, shitty reason for posting the article.

Shitty.
Your opinion is noted.

[ChumpDumper]

The absolute lack of any quote from the murder victim is noted.

The glee with which you and others have celebrated his death when you knew absolutely nothing about him before the rss feed spat the story out is noted.

[Yonivore]

The absolute lack of any quote from the murder victim is noted.

The glee with which you and others have celebrated his death when you knew absolutely nothing about him before the rss feed spat the story out is noted.
Oh, he was a Common Core advocate too. Double stupid.

[ChumpDumper]

http://gif.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/GRONKSPIKE2.gif

[Spurminator]

LOL

Dude wrote three blog posts for a SPLC-affiliated site between 1996 and 1998. No wonder it wasn't mentioned in his obituary. Read them here: http://www.tolerance.org/author/david-ruenzel

Meanwhile this article claiming he was some kind of prominent SPLC writer who justified black violence because of white privilege has been gleefully passed around all of the standard white supremacy sites like Stormfront.org. That's proud company, Yonivore! Nice work.

[Spurminator]

The American Thinker audience seems like a nice bunch of guys. Highly intellectual. My favorite part is when someone compares Reunzel to Goebbels, and a bunch of people start coming to Goebbels' defense!

baldridge999 (https://disqus.com/home/user/baldridge999/) • 14 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)
Probably his last words to his thug murderers were: "Please don't kill me. I hate white people just as much as you do."

Perplexed (https://disqus.com/home/user/PerplexedII/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723511844)
Little did he know that he enabled the black thug mentality that killed him.

Nicholas I (https://disqus.com/home/user/nicholasi/) HSkol (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1729427335)• 10 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1729439221)
Good riddance. Back to your atheist gay Lutheran mosque. You can boast there about your crappy class of '91, and seek pity for your hasbara failures and get retrained.

Tasine (https://disqus.com/home/user/Tasine/) Perplexed (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723511844)• 11 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1727011262)
If there is a God and I believe there is, Ruenzel KNOWS. And therein lies justice.

E. +Goldstein (https://disqus.com/home/user/disqus_C22dHfKkqu/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723447989)
Just like Goebbels, Ruenzel died believing in his own propaganda. They both made their living lying and knowing they were lying, until they finally came to believe their own propaganda. They were worthless lying creeps the world is better off without.

Raydonn (https://disqus.com/home/user/Raydonn/) E. +Goldstein (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723447989)• 12 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1725704147)
What 'propaganda' did Herr Goebbels believe?

Hank Seiter (https://disqus.com/home/user/hankseiter/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723450947)
Good point. Poetic justice, I'd say. Good riddance.

Mike Malloy (https://disqus.com/home/user/mike_malloy/) Rikka775 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723566537)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723661391)
I believe it was Jane Gooddall whose life mission was to prove that lions, gorillas and apes were of high intelligence, and if approached in a spirit of love and understanding could co-exist with humans. She fully documented her theory---until they killed and ate her.
:lmao :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Jane will be so surprised to read she's been killed by a cabal of lions, gorillas and apes.

[Spurminator]

"Athiest gay Lutheran mosque" :lmao

[FromWayDowntown]

I opened this thinking it was about Ted Cruz.

[Yonivore]

The American Thinker audience seems like a nice bunch of guys. Highly intellectual. My favorite part is when someone compares Reunzel to Goebbels, and a bunch of people start coming to Goebbels' defense!

baldridge999 (https://disqus.com/home/user/baldridge999/) • 14 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)
Probably his last words to his thug murderers were: "Please don't kill me. I hate white people just as much as you do."

Perplexed (https://disqus.com/home/user/PerplexedII/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723511844)
Little did he know that he enabled the black thug mentality that killed him.

Nicholas I (https://disqus.com/home/user/nicholasi/) HSkol (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1729427335)• 10 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1729439221)
Good riddance. Back to your atheist gay Lutheran mosque. You can boast there about your crappy class of '91, and seek pity for your hasbara failures and get retrained.

Tasine (https://disqus.com/home/user/Tasine/) Perplexed (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723511844)• 11 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1727011262)
If there is a God and I believe there is, Ruenzel KNOWS. And therein lies justice.

E. +Goldstein (https://disqus.com/home/user/disqus_C22dHfKkqu/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723447989)
Just like Goebbels, Ruenzel died believing in his own propaganda. They both made their living lying and knowing they were lying, until they finally came to believe their own propaganda. They were worthless lying creeps the world is better off without.

Raydonn (https://disqus.com/home/user/Raydonn/) E. +Goldstein (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723447989)• 12 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1725704147)
What 'propaganda' did Herr Goebbels believe?

Hank Seiter (https://disqus.com/home/user/hankseiter/) baldridge999 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723252959)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723450947)
Good point. Poetic justice, I'd say. Good riddance.

Mike Malloy (https://disqus.com/home/user/mike_malloy/) Rikka775 (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723566537)• 13 days ago (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_cri me_comments.html#comment-1723661391)
I believe it was Jane Gooddall whose life mission was to prove that lions, gorillas and apes were of high intelligence, and if approached in a spirit of love and understanding could co-exist with humans. She fully documented her theory---until they killed and ate her.
:lmao :lmao
Sounds like a bunch of people in here...starting with boutons.

Please note, I haven't agreed with any of those commenters (although, I come closest to agreeing with "Perplexed baldridge999) and, I rarely judge content based on attached commentary; some of the weirdest people inhabit the internet commentariat.

[FromWayDowntown]

So you think Ruenzel deserved what happened to him and that his death is justice?

"If only he had distrusted blacks, he'd still be alive . . . . "

Where's that Gronkowski spike clip when you need it?

[Yonivore]

So you think Ruenzel deserved what happened to him and that his death is justice?
No. I think it's a tragedy.


"If only he had distrusted blacks, he'd still be alive . . . . "
I don't know that he did or did not trust blacks.

I merely pointed out the irony. I made no judgment on whether or not his death was due to the white privilege-driven black violence he allegedly described.

[Spurminator]

I merely pointed out the irony. I made no judgment on whether or not his death was due to the white privilege-driven black violence he allegedly described.


Dude wrote three blog posts for a SPLC-affiliated site between 1996 and 1998. No wonder it wasn't mentioned in his obituary. Read them here: http://www.tolerance.org/author/david-ruenzel

FYI - The words "White privilege" do not appear in any of the three (3) blog posts that comprise the entirety of your "irony."

[spurraider21]

Did you know this person existed before you got this story, yoni?
why is that relevant?

[ChumpDumper]

why is that relevant?Did you know this person existed before reading this thread?

[spurraider21]

Did you know this person existed before reading this thread?
i can ignore questions too

[ChumpDumper]

i can ignore questions tooJust finding further proof that yoni learns what to think about such things exclusively from shitty blogs like that one.

I had never heard of this guy before.

I doubt anyone here had.

[spurraider21]

Just finding further proof that yoni learns what to think about such things exclusively from shitty blogs like that one.

I had never heard of this guy before.

I doubt anyone here had.
when was the last time somebody was murdered and you knew about the person before the story? doesn't mean its wrong to have discussion about it

[ChumpDumper]

when was the last time somebody was murdered and you knew about the person before the story? doesn't mean its wrong to have discussion about itThe contention that it is noteworthy per OP has yet to be borne out by any facts.

[Yonivore]

The contention that it is noteworthy per OP has yet to be borne out by any facts.
Did you know who Michael Brown was before he was shot?

[ChumpDumper]

Did you know who Michael Brown was before he was shot?We know why that was noteworthy. Still waiting for something that backs up your characterizations of the victim here.

[Yonivore]

We know why that was noteworthy.
Actually, no; I have no idea why the shooting of Michael Brown was noteworthy beyond his family, circle of friends, and the community of Ferguson, Missouri.


Still waiting for something that backs up your characterizations of the victim here.
Because it touched on a broader idiotic aspect of liberal ideology - White Privilege and because of the irony.

[ChumpDumper]

Actually, no; I have no idea why the shooting of Michael Brown was noteworthy beyond his family, circle of friends, and the community of Ferguson, Missouri.Well that's your personal problem.



Because it touched on a broader idiotic aspect of liberal ideology - White Privilege and because of the irony.What is your proof of this?

Been asking you all day.

[Yonivore]

Well that's your personal problem.
I don't view it as a problem.


What is your proof of this?

Been asking you all day.
Yeah, I'm waiting on a reply from American Thinker. They were pretty specific about when he started writing about the topic in 1997 so, I guessing they have a source that is not accessible via the internet. We'll see. If the article was wrong, I'll personally apologize to the family in this thread. I'm sure they're hanging on our every word.

Other than that, the idea of White Privilege being a catalyst for black violence is something the liberals love to harp about...

Student mugged, says he deserved it because of his 'privilege' (http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6097)

I can't help but believe Dr. Ruenzel would believe the same way if, in fact, what has been said about him is true.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't view it as a problem.Of course you don't.



Yeah, I'm waiting on a reply from American Thinker. They were pretty specific about when he started writing about the topic in 1997 so, I guessing they have a source that is not accessible via the internet. We'll see. If the article was wrong, I'll personally apologize to the family in this thread. I'm sure they're hanging on our every word.

Other than that, the idea of White Privilege being a catalyst for black violence is something the liberals love to harp about...

Student mugged, says he deserved it because of his 'privilege' (http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6097)

I can't help but believe Dr. Ruenzel would believe the same way if, in fact, what has been said about him is true.That has nothing to do with my question about Ruenzel, but you can celebrate that guy's mugging here too while you wait for "American Thinker" to think for you:
https://33.media.tumblr.com/06791b0e42a89fc32505360d6bdb0d2d/tumblr_mkr0zeemgt1rxq60ao1_400.gif

[Yonivore]

That has nothing to do with my question about Ruenzel,...
Well, then restate your question, I've obviously missed it in all your non-question questions.

[ChumpDumper]

What is the evidence he said this?

[Yonivore]

And, as I said, it's a legitimate question that's been asked of American Thinker by more than me.

But, as I also said, since they were very specific, I am thinking they have a source not accessible to us on the internet. We'll see.

Finally, I said, if it turns out they can't produce any writings by Ruenzel, I'll apologize to the family in this thread.

See, you weren't paying attention. I'd already answered the question.

[ChumpDumper]

And, as I said, it's a legitimate question that's been asked of American Thinker by more than me.Was is the distinction between you and a blog?


But, as I also said, since they were very specific, I am thinking they have a source not accessible to us on the internet. We'll see.Any document can be scanned and posted.

Or just quoted and sourced.

So there is no proof backing your contention you regurgitated from your blog.

I was paying attention to that all along.

[Yonivore]

Was is the distinction between you and a blog?
Why don't you just ever make a statement? Your question is obviously trying to elicit a particular response so, why don't you just skip the extra half-dozen nonsensical question posts and say what it is you want to say?


Any document can be scanned and posted.

Or just quoted and sourced.
You're right. I think they need to pony up and, it's probably something I should have waited for before posting.

[ChumpDumper]

Why don't you just ever make a statement? Your question is obviously trying to elicit a particular response so, why don't you just skip the extra half-dozen nonsensical question posts and say what it is you want to say?I couldn't see a difference, so I asked for one.


You're right. I think they need to pony up and, it's probably something I should have waited for before posting.lol probably

[Yonivore]

So there is no proof backing your contention you regurgitated from your blog.

I was paying attention to that all along.
Well, to be fair, it's a lot better than the "Fake but accurate" excuse CBS clung to for so long in their hit piece on President Bush.

[Yonivore]

I couldn't see a difference, so I asked for one.

lol probably
Hey, it's a mistake. I guess you don't make them. Must be nice.

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

One of the head kikes at the SPLC claims he wrote white privilege articles for them here http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splcenter.org%2Fblog%2F2014%2F12% 2F04%2Famerican-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel%2F

[ChumpDumper]

One of the head kikes at the SPLC claims he wrote white privilege articles for them here http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splcenter.org%2Fblog%2F2014%2F12% 2F04%2Famerican-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel%2FWhich one is the white privilege article?

[Spurminator]

But, as I also said, since they were very specific, I am thinking they have a source not accessible to us on the internet. We'll see.


They weren't specific at all, which is the problem, and yet you've placed your trust in them despite the fact that they think you're a complete moron. Most people would be insulted by this. But not you.

[bobcatfan4life]

This was posted in the Club already.

[Yonivore]

One of the head kikes at the SPLC claims he wrote white privilege articles for them here http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splcenter.org%2Fblog%2F2014%2F12% 2F04%2Famerican-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel%2F

American Thinker Sinks to the Bottom of Racist Barrel (http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/12/04/american-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel/)


Ruenzel, an English teacher, wrote a few posts on white privilege and other topics for the Southern Poverty Law Center’s esteemed Teaching Tolerance project back in the late 1990s.

I guess, Heidi Beirich, the Intelligence Project Coordinator at SPLC would be as good as source as anyone...

[Spurminator]

American Thinker Sinks to the Bottom of Racist Barrel (http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/12/04/american-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel/)

I guess, Heidi Beirich, the Intelligence Project Coordinator at SPLC would be as good as source as anyone...

I already linked to those posts. There were three of them. The last one was in 1998. None of them mentions "white privilege." You've been duped.

[ChumpDumper]

Don't you read anything, yoni?

[Yonivore]

I already linked to those posts. There were three of them. The last one was in 1998. None of them mentions "white privilege." You've been duped.
So, the SPLC's Heidi Beirich is mistaken? Lying? What? Perhaps they removed the articles about white privilege. I don't know but, an authoritative source from the SPLC says Ruenzel wrote articles for them about white privilege.

I'm uncertain why the Southern Poverty Law Center's "Intelligence Project Coordinator" would say Ruenzel wrote articles, for the SPLC, about white privilege if, in fact, he hadn't.

It's curious.

[ChumpDumper]

So, the SPLC's Heidi Beirich is mistaken?I'd say American Thinker just grossly misrepresented, or more succinctly, lied.

There certainly isn't the kind of stuff you were programmed to think he wrote.

[Spurminator]

So, the SPLC's Heidi Beirich is mistaken? Lying? What? Perhaps they removed the articles about white privilege. I don't know but, an authoritative source from the SPLC says Ruenzel wrote articles for them about white privilege.

I'm uncertain why the Southern Poverty Law Center's "Intelligence Project Coordinator" would say Ruenzel wrote articles, for the SPLC, about white privilege if, in fact, he hadn't.

It's curious.

:lol

I don't know either, why don't you read the fucking articles yourself and let us know where Ruentzel says that black violence is justified through white privilege, since that's the delicious irony you created a thread about.

[Yonivore]

I'd say American Thinker just grossly misrepresented, or more succinctly, lied.

There certainly isn't the kind of stuff you were programmed to think he wrote.
Here's a Chumpesque question for you,

Did the SPLC say Ruenzel wrote for them about white privilege or not?

[Yonivore]

:lol

I don't know either, why don't you read the fucking articles yourself and let us know where Ruentzel says that black violence is justified through white privilege, since that's the delicious irony you created a thread about.
Got to find them to read them. I'm trying.

[Spurminator]

Got to find them to read them. I'm trying.

I linked them twice.

Here's the link again: http://www.tolerance.org/author/david-ruenzel

[ChumpDumper]

Don't you read anything, yoni?

[Yonivore]

I linked them twice.

Here's the link again: http://www.tolerance.org/author/david-ruenzel
I'm talking about the articles to which the SPLC's Intelligence Project Coordinator, Heidi Beirich, is referring when she says Reunzel wrote articles on white privilege. The articles you posted (and the ones I've already found) are clearly the second category of articles to which Ms. Beirich referred, "and other topics."

It's clear he was a big fan of Common Core so, perhaps that is one of the other topics to which she is referring.

I'd like to see the articles on white privilege the SPLC says he wrote.

[Winehole23]

the documents are still being translated

[Yonivore]

:lmao You really must not have a life.

But, nice evasion of the question, why would the SPLC say he had written, for them, about white privilege if, in fact, he hadn't?

[Spurminator]

It's reasonable for the SPLC to describe at least two of those articles as being about "white privilege and other topics" even though the phrase "white privilege" is never used.

"Positive Numbers" deals with disadvantages minorities have later in life because of the low quality of math education they receive. He brings up topics like racial bias in algebra textbooks, etc.

"Crucial Conversations" is all about negative racial stereotypes influencing negative self-image and negative habits.

You are free to keep clinging to the idea that there are other more provocative articles he wrote for the SPLC that suggested that whites deserve to be the victims of black violence because of their privilege, and that those articles mysteriously disappeared for everyone except the author of the American Thinker piece, who has copies of those articles but still decided not to quote any part of them in his blog about them. It reminds me a little of Joseph Smith and the early Mormons, but if that's enough for you, so be it.

[Yonivore]

It's reasonable for the SPLC to describe at least two of those articles as being about "white privilege and other topics" even though the phrase "white privilege" is never used.

"Positive Numbers" deals with disadvantages minorities have later in life because of the low quality of math education they receive. He brings up topics like racial bias in algebra textbooks, etc.

"Crucial Conversations" is all about negative racial stereotypes influencing negative self-image and negative habits.

You are free to keep clinging to the idea that there are other more provocative articles he wrote for the SPLC that suggested that whites deserve to be the victims of black violence because of their privilege, and that those articles mysteriously disappeared for everyone except the author of the American Thinker piece, who has copies of those articles but still decided not to quote any part of them in his blog about them. It reminds me a little of Joseph Smith and the early Mormons, but if that's enough for you, so be it.
Nah, I've lost interest. May he rest in peace.

[ChumpDumper]

http://cdn3.sbnation.com/imported_assets/1271419/gronkwalk.gif

[Winehole23]

:lmao You really must not have a life.You were wrong about that, you were wrong about this. Some things never change.

[Winehole23]

Smilies and tortured interpretations don't change it. Sorry.