Media silence racist right wingers

[TheSanityAnnex]

http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/13/michael-bloomberg-blocks-video-of-pro-gun-control-talk-from-being-published/


Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg has successfully blocked video from a controversial talk he gave at the Aspen Institute last week from being posted online.
At the Institute’s Feb. 5 event, the pro-gun control multi-billionaire suggested keeping guns out of the hands of young, male minorities.
Ninety-five percent of murders are attributed to the group, said Bloomberg, who has spend tens of millions of dollars on various gun control initiatives, including the group Everytown for Gun Safety.


“These kids think they’re going to get killed anyway because all their friends are getting killed,” Bloomberg said at the summit. “They just don’t have any long-term focus or anything. It’s a joke to have a gun. It’s a joke to pull a trigger.”
Various national media outlets jumped on the pointed comments, for both the pro-gun control sentiment and the racial aspect.
Perhaps because of that response, Bloomberg, who founded the massive Bloomberg L.P. media empire, has asked both the Aspen Institute and GrassRoots TV, the company that filmed the event, to refrain from broadcasting footage of the talk, according to The Aspen Times (http://www.aspentimes.com/news/15037917-113/michael-bloomberg-blocks-footage-of-aspen-institute-appearance).
The Aspen Institute, which regularly hosts movers’ and shakers’ policy talks, accommodated Bloomberg’s request. To
“We basically honor the wishes of our speakers and Mayor Bloomberg preferred that we not use the video for broadcast,” Jim Spiegelman, chief external affairs officer for the Aspen Institute told The Aspen Times. “He did not give a reason nor did we have any reason to ask for one. We often feature speakers who prefer that their presentations not be videotaped.”


GrassRoots TV executive director Jim Masters was not necessarily pleased with the request — which he called “frustrating” — but will still comply.
“We’re not pleased about it,” Masters told The Times. “We wish that people who could not make it [to the Institute] and could not afford to be there — they should be able to participate in that information also.”
During his talk, Bloomberg also discussed “stop-and-frisk,” a policing practice he advocated and expanded during his mayoral tenure. He said that one way to deal with the issue of gun proliferation among young, minority males is to “throw them up against the wall and frisk them.”
Bloomberg’s comments prompted a response from the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association.
“Mayor Bloomberg’s statement that black males should not be allowed to have guns echos similar sentiments made by southern white supremacists in the 19th century,” Tom King, the association’s president, said in a statement, according to the Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/8/sughed-michael-bloomberg-suggests-disarming-minori/). “So-called ‘Black Codes’ were enacted by various southern states to discriminate against black Americans and maintain the system of white supremacy that made slavery possible. These included restrictions on firearms possession.”


“If a politician said this about anything other than guns, the mainstream media would be all over them,” King added. “Michael Bloomberg isn’t just any politician, he is the leading voice for gun control in America. He should be held accountable for this slander.”
Follow Chuck on Twitter (http://www.twitter.com/chuckrossdc)

[TheSanityAnnex]

"It's controversial, but first thing is all of your — 95 percent of your murders, and murderers, and murder victims fit one [unintelligible]. You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all of the cops. They are male, minorities, 15 to 25. That's true in New York, it's true in virtually every city in America," said Bloomberg. "You've got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed," he continued. "First thing you can do to help that group is to keep them alive."

[ChumpDumper]

How did the media silence anything here?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Media silence, as in crickets.

[Winehole23]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=75978

[Th'Pusher]

Media silence, as in crickets.
extremely poorly worded title, as in it's possible you're barely literate.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I was extremely concerned about the title of the thread.

This thread is going as expected :tu

[Winehole23]

Media silence, as in crickets.did a story get spiked, or a did an obvious non-story just get exaggerated?

matter of perspective, I guess.

[ChumpDumper]

Media silence, as in crickets.How big a story do you think this should be?

I think your email list is about the right level tbh.

[Th'Pusher]

:lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

How big a story do you think this should be?

I think your email list is about the right level tbh.
Considering the office he held, the millions he's poured into anti-gun groups, and the influence he has on politics I think it should be a much bigger story.

Always amuses me me when the usual suspects talk about anything but the OP.

[ElNono]

People have disagreed with his methods, but Bloomberg does have a solid track record on crime in NY while he was the Mayor.

Personally, I never agreed with the stop & frisk policy or the erosion of constitutional rights, but he has gotten results doing it his way.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Will moms demand action distance themselves from him? Will every town for gun safety cut off the millions a year in funding? Will mayors against illegal guns support this racist?

[TheSanityAnnex]

People have disagreed with his methods, but Bloomberg does have a solid track record on crime in NY while he was the Mayor.

Personally, I never agreed with the stop & frisk policy or the erosion of constitutional rights, but he has gotten results doing it his way.

Getting warmer

[ElNono]

Getting warmer

uh?

[Th'Pusher]

Considering the office he held, the millions he's poured into anti-gun groups, and the influence he has on politics I think it should be a much bigger story.

Emotional, tbh.

[ChumpDumper]

Considering the office he held, the millions he's poured into anti-gun groups, and the influence he has on politics I think it should be a much bigger story. How many millions?

And can you quantify his actual influence on politics right now? This is the first I've heard about him in months.


Always amuses me me when the usual suspects talk about anything but the OP.What is there to talk about? Bloomberg always struck me as paternalistic, but your overreacting always amuses me -- especially when "the media" doesn't act like you think it should.

[TheSanityAnnex]

uh?
Bloomberg has a solid point no?

[ChumpDumper]

Oh, TSA just wants everything to be about race.

I get it.

But if he thinks Bloomberg has a solid point when he calls for gun control, who am I to argue?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Emotional, tbh.


called it

[Th'Pusher]

This thread is going as expected :tu

[TheSanityAnnex]

Oh, TSA just wants everything to be about race.

I get it.

But if he thinks Bloomberg has a solid point when he calls for gun control, who am I to argue?try adding something of substance to the thread...do you agree with Bloomberg's statement?

[ChumpDumper]

try adding something of substance to the thread...do you agree with Bloomberg's statement?What could I add after you said you think Bloomberg has a point when making a call for stronger gun control?

I must say I'm surprised.

[TheSanityAnnex]

What could I add after you said you think Bloomberg has a point when making a call for stronger gun control?

I must say I'm surprised.
That is not an answer to the question. Try again.

[ElNono]

Bloomberg has a solid point no?

I don't really know. I haven't seen figures that illustrate that point. I do think that keeping guns from mentally unstable individuals is probably a good idea, but I doubt the guns he's referring to come from legal channels.

[Fabbs]

"young, male minorities.
Ninety-five percent of murders are attributed to the group", said Bloomberg,

True or false?
Sidepoint is Aaron Hernandez the killer from the Patriots all hispanic or part coon?

[ChumpDumper]

That is not an answer to the question. Try again.What are you saying is Bloomberg's point?

Make yourself clear.

[ChumpDumper]

"young, male minorities.
Ninety-five percent of murders are attributed to the group", said Bloomberg,

True or false?
Sidepoint is Aaron Hernandez the killer from the Patriots all hispanic or part coon?Why do you feel the need to use racist terms?

[Fabbs]

Why do you feel the need to use racist terms?
I wasn't talking to you.
Why do you feel the need to butt in?

Could you crop the picture of the person on the right?
http://ll-media.tmz.com/2015/02/02/0202-giovanni-ribisi-agyness-deyn-divorce-tmz-4.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

I wasn't talking to you.I am talking to you.


Why do you feel the need to butt in?Why won't you just say why you feel the need to use such a racist term?

[TheSanityAnnex]

How many millions?

And can you quantify his actual influence on politics right now? This is the first I've heard about him in months.

What is there to talk about? Bloomberg always struck me as paternalistic, but your overreacting always amuses me -- especially when "the media" doesn't act like you think it should.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2014/09/25/how-bloombergs-million-dollar-desire-for-gun-control-is-backfiring/

[TheSanityAnnex]

What are you saying is Bloomberg's point?

Make yourself clear.
Bloomberg made his point pretty fucking clear. Do you or do you not agree with it?

[Clipper Nation]

extremely poorly worded title, as in it's possible you're barely literate.
The title is clearly making you get emotional.

[ChumpDumper]

Bloomberg made his point pretty fucking clear. Do you or do you not agree with it?He made several points. Tell me which one you are talking about.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He made several points. Tell me which one you are talking about.
List his points

[ChumpDumper]

List his pointsList the one you are talking about and I will tell you if I agree.

That will be much simpler.

[TheSanityAnnex]

List the one you are talking about and I will tell you if I agree.

That will be much simpler.
You enjoy playing dumb too much. Post #2.

[ChumpDumper]

"It's controversial, but first thing is all of your — 95 percent of your murders, and murderers, and murder victims fit one [unintelligible]. You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all of the cops. They are male, minorities, 15 to 25. That's true in New York, it's true in virtually every city in America," said Bloomberg. "You've got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed," he continued. "First thing you can do to help that group is to keep them alive."I'm not sure if I agree with the number. When you lead with "all" and walk back, anything you say is suspect.

I will readily agree that some demographics are involved in more murders than others. I would stipulate any differences in actual statistics.

Is that the point that is supposed to be so controversial?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Should 15-25 year old males be denied the right to bear arms based on the color of their skin?

[ChumpDumper]

Should 15-25 year old males be denied the right to bear arms based on the color of their skin?Bloomberg called for a specific law doing that?

I didn't see that in the material you quoted. Perhaps you could point it out to me.

Otherwise, you may have based this entire thread on a straw man.

[m>s]

How big a story do you think this should be?

I think your email list is about the right level tbh.
You're such a shill, it's blatant racism and if a conservative said it, it'd be national news and you know it

you little cocksuckimg fuck ooohhhhh I cannot wait until the day

[ChumpDumper]

You're such a shill, it's blatant racism and if a conservative said it, it'd be national news and you know it

you little cocksuckimg fuck ooohhhhh I cannot wait until the dayWhat day?

What are you saying?

Don't be frightened little pussy.

[Fabbs]

You enjoy playing dumb too much. Post #2.
RumpHumper should girls be used in provocative poses with guns?
Or is this glorifying gun violence?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8e/7d/c6/8e7dc6a8b9bfc1eb86f87df0c7f0b4e0.jpg
Are you offended because she is not a minority?

[ChumpDumper]

RumpHumper should girls be used in provocative poses with guns?
Or is this glorifying gun violence?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8e/7d/c6/8e7dc6a8b9bfc1eb86f87df0c7f0b4e0.jpg
Are you offended because she is not a minority?Why do you feel the need to use such racist terms as you did earlier and ran away from?

[Fabbs]

I think she's pretty hot.
Do you feel she is?

[m>s]

What day?

What are you saying?

Don't be frightened little pussy.
Ill show u pussy you fucking little progressive wuss

[m>s]

Why do you feel the need to use such racist terms as you did earlier and ran away from?
I'll show you racist

Fuck off kike

[ChumpDumper]

I think she's pretty hot.
Do you feel she is?Why do you feel the need to use such racist terms as you did earlier and ran away from?



Ill show u pussy you fucking little progressive wussYou're still too much of a pussy to say what day you're talking about.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Bloomberg called for a specific law doing that?

I didn't see that in the material you quoted. Perhaps you could point it out to me.

Otherwise, you may have based this entire thread on a straw man.That is me asking you a direct question. Should 15-25 year old males be denied the right to bear arms based on the color of their skin?

[ChumpDumper]

That is me asking you a direct question. Should 15-25 year old males be denied the right to bear arms based on the color of their skin?This question is based on nothing in the article, so I don't know why you re asking it. I will answer if you stipulate that Bloomberg proposed no such law at all.

[ChumpDumper]

*crickets*

Ok, well since no one brought up such a law except you -- no, there shouldn't be such a law.

[TheSanityAnnex]

*crickets*

Ok, well since no one brought up such a law except you -- no, there shouldn't be such a law.

I agree with this as well.

Should 15-25 year old males be disarmed based on the color of their skin?

[Blake]

Ill show u pussy

What are you waiting for...lift your skirt

[hater]

People have disagreed with his methods, but Bloomberg does have a solid track record on crime in NY while he was the Mayor.

Personally, I never agreed with the stop & frisk policy or the erosion of constitutional rights, but he has gotten results doing it his way.

I'm pretty sure crime was at an all time low in Nazi Germany as well tbqh

[Blake]

I'm pretty sure crime was at an all time low in Nazi Germany as well tbqh

Minus the crimes against humanity

but lol Godwin

[hater]

yup I was right:
"By 1938, the crime rate was at an all-time low because repeat offenders were being sent to a concentration camp after they had completed their second sentence. Anyone who did not have a permanent address and some visible means of support was hauled off the Dachau and put to work."

:lol maybe Bloomberg can put the homeless to work :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I agree with this as well.

Should 15-25 year old males be disarmed based on the color of their skin?Answer my question first.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Answer my question first.

Which is?

[ChumpDumper]

Bloomberg called for a specific law doing that?

I didn't see that in the material you quoted. Perhaps you could point it out to me.

Otherwise, you may have based this entire thread on a straw man.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No laws were discussed in the OP so no.


Should 15-25 year old males be disarmed based on the color of their skin?

[Winehole23]

absolutely not.

who's putting it up for discussion? is this your hobby horse, TSA?

[ChumpDumper]

absolutely not.

who's putting it up for discussion? is this your hobby horse, TSA?

[TheSanityAnnex]

absolutely not.

who's putting it up for discussion? is this your hobby horse, TSA?

Bloomberg put it up for discussion and has now had it blocked from release to the public. Do you even OP?

[Winehole23]

Bloomberg put it up for discussionoy vey, what are you gonna do?

[Th'Pusher]

"It's controversial, but first thing is all of your — 95 percent of your murders, and murderers, and murder victims fit one [unintelligible]. You can just take the description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all of the cops. They are male, minorities, 15 to 25. That's true in New York, it's true in virtually every city in America," said Bloomberg. "You've got to get the guns out of the hands of the people getting killed," he continued. "First thing you can do to help that group is to keep them alive."

TSA reads the above and interprets that as banning guns based on race. As if that were the only way to get the guns out of the hands of people getting killed. An emotional response combined with a healthy dose of confirmation bias and severely poor reading comprehension skills.

Nice work TSA. One of your better threads tbh.

[m>s]

What are you waiting for...lift your skirt
Your wife already did cuck


same goes for you too

[m>s]

yup I was right:
"By 1938, the crime rate was at an all-time low because repeat offenders were being sent to a concentration camp after they had completed their second sentence. Anyone who did not have a permanent address and some visible means of support was hauled off the Dachau and put to work."

:lol maybe Bloomberg can put the homeless to work :lmao
Job well done. Anyone here I dare you to try to logically explain why this isn't a good plan. Pro tip: you can't.

we were put here to work, and work we all must

[Blake]

Your wife already did cuck


same goes for you too

less talk more skirt lifting.

[Blake]

Job well done. Anyone here I dare you to try to logically explain why this isn't a good plan. Pro tip: you can't.

we were put here to work, and work we all must

Wow. Prisoners being put to work is a genius idea. I wonder why we don't do that here.

[Winehole23]

a right wing pundit would be calumniated and dead-catted for committing off the record insensitivity of a similar magnitude, but Bloomberg gets a pass because he's kinda kin to the Boss...

[ChumpDumper]

Bloomberg put it up for discussion and has now had it blocked from release to the public. Do you even OP?This thread is a complete straw man, just as I said.

Bloomberg did not put it "up for discussion."

[m>s]

Wow. Prisoners being put to work is a genius idea. I wonder why we don't do that here.
We don't put lazy asses and freeloaders in prison that's the difference

[TheSanityAnnex]

TSA reads the above and interprets that as banning guns based on race. As if that were the only way to get the guns out of the hands of people getting killed. An emotional response combined with a healthy dose of confirmation bias and severely poor reading comprehension skills.

Nice work TSA. One of your better threads tbh.

I read it for what it was. The 100 million dollar face of gun control wants to disarm people based on age and race.

[TheSanityAnnex]

This thread is a complete straw man, just as I said.

Bloomberg did not put it "up for discussion."

Of course he put it up for discussion, we wouldn't be discussing it if he didn't.

Why do you think he blocked it from being aired?

[Blake]

We don't put lazy asses and freeloaders in prison that's the difference

oh, you guys are serious about making laziness a crime? Rofl.

Layout your plan, der fuhrer, so we can make fun of how stupid it is

[ElNono]

yup I was right:
"By 1938, the crime rate was at an all-time low because repeat offenders were being sent to a concentration camp after they had completed their second sentence. Anyone who did not have a permanent address and some visible means of support was hauled off the Dachau and put to work."

:lol maybe Bloomberg can put the homeless to work :lmao

:lol if you think NY looked anything like Nazi Germany during Bloomberg's tenure as Mayor, then you probably have bigger mental problems than the kids he's talking about.

[ChumpDumper]

Of course he put it up for discussion, we wouldn't be discussing it if he didn't.We're discussing how you built a straw man in an attempt to race bait.


Why do you think he blocked it from being aired?The very race baiting you are engaging in right now.

[TheSanityAnnex]

We're discussing how you built a straw man in an attempt to race bait.

The very race baiting you are engaging in right now.

Are you saying that what Bloomberg said is not racist?

[ChumpDumper]

Are you saying that what Bloomberg said is not racist?Are you?

I'm saying you are race baiting based on a straw man you made.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Are you?

I'm saying you are race baiting based on a straw man you made.

Do you ever answer a question the first time you are asked?

How is me calling Bloomberg's statement racist race baiting?

[m>s]

oh, you guys are serious about making laziness a crime? Rofl.

Layout your plan, der fuhrer, so we can make fun of how stupid it is

See this is the problem with the leftist brain. You laugh off common sense solutions that work in favor of retarded Muh feels type shit. You're basically a woman..you just have two tiny little pebbles there where the vagina should be. And yes everyone should have to work. Hundreds of years ago what would have happened if someone didn't work? And why should today be any different?

[Blake]

See this is the problem with the leftist brain. You laugh off common sense solutions that work in favor of retarded Muh feels type shit. You're basically a woman..you just have two tiny little pebbles there where the vagina should be. And yes everyone should have to work. Hundreds of years ago what would have happened if someone didn't work? And why should today be any different?

Yeah. Lay out your plan for a lazy labor camp instead of ad hominems, das puss.

[m>s]

work for welfare program. food stamps aren't just given, they are earned at local federal work camps

[ChumpDumper]

Do you ever answer a question the first time you are asked?You haven't.


How is me calling Bloomberg's statement racist race baiting?Self-explanatory tbh.

[TeyshaBlue]

a right wing pundit would be calumniated and dead-catted for committing off the record insensitivity of a similar magnitude, but Bloomberg gets a pass because he's kinda kin to the Boss...

*Willfully Ignored Post*

[TheSanityAnnex]

You haven't.

Self-explanatory tbh.
Bullshit. And another non answer from you as expected.

[Th'Pusher]

*Willfully Ignored Post*
A truism willfully ignored by me as to not derail the thread.

[ChumpDumper]

Bullshit. And another non answer from you as expected.I don't think what he said was racist. Probably just statistically inaccurate.

I can see why you are so excited though. Gives you a chance to race bait. Good for you.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I don't think what he said was racist. Probably just statistically inaccurate.

I can see why you are so excited though. Gives you a chance to race bait. Good for you.
I don't race bait and I never have. I've been here long enough for you too know this. This thread was about the media turning a blind eye to Bloomberg's obviously racist statements.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't race bait and I never have. I've been here long enough for you too know this. This thread was about the media turning a blind eye to Bloomberg's obviously racist statements.What's racist about it?

I believe he exaggerated the percentage he listed, but he didn't call for a law to discriminate on the basis of race as you keep trying to claim.

[Blake]

work for welfare program. food stamps aren't just given, they are earned at local federal work camps

and if they don't want to work, fuehrer?

[m>s]

I don't think what he said was racist.

denying rights to a certain group based upon a perceived trend. yeah that's racist, take it from me, i'm a racist and i would know. the problem is i'm not scared and don't shy away from it. science is racist, facts are racist, i don't really care but what bloomberg said is racist. and i don't even give a shit that he's racist, i give a shit that he gets away with it while others have to watch themselves or people get all pissy. the left wields the r-word as a weapon of political gain while they are the biggest racists around. who was the pro slavery party again? yep, dems.

[m>s]

and if they don't want to work, fuehrer?
they'd work, starving is painful and after 2 days without eating they'd show up at the camp to work and then they'd get fed.

[ChumpDumper]

denying rights to a certain group based upon a perceived trend. yeah that's racist, take it from me, i'm a racist and i would know. the problem is i'm not scared and don't shy away from it. science is racist, facts are racist, i don't really care but what bloomberg said is racist. and i don't even give a shit that he's racist, i give a shit that he gets away with it while others have to watch themselves or people get all pissy.

Who said he wanted to deny a right to a certain group?

He said he wanted guns out of their hands. There are ways to do that without passing a law that discriminates on the basis of race.

Are you guys being willfully stupid or can you not help it?

[TheSanityAnnex]

What's racist about it?

I believe he exaggerated the percentage he listed, but he didn't call for a law to discriminate on the basis of race as you keep trying to claim.Explain to me how one would get guns out of a demographics hands while basing the citeria on age and skin color without being racist. Best of luck.

Lol you'll need to provide a quote of me claiming he called for a law to disarm based on race. Also find examples of me race baiting while you're at it.

[TeyshaBlue]

A truism willfully ignored by me as to not derail the thread.

This thread has a rail?

Oh yeah. Its about the coverage/not coverage of a stupid statement. Carry on.

smh

[TheSanityAnnex]

denying rights to a certain group based upon a perceived trend. yeah that's racist, take it from me, i'm a racist and i would know. the problem is i'm not scared and don't shy away from it. science is racist, facts are racist, i don't really care but what bloomberg said is racist. and i don't even give a shit that he's racist, i give a shit that he gets away with it while others have to watch themselves or people get all pissy. the left wields the r-word as a weapon of political gain while they are the biggest racists around. who was the pro slavery party again? yep, dems.
Bloomberg getting away with it was the entire point of the thread.

[ChumpDumper]

Explain to me how one would get guns out of a demographics hands while basing the citeria on age and skin color without being racist. Best of luck. Easy. Prohibit guns away from a larger demographic that includes the subset.

No racial component needed.

And that's only if you are talking about laws.

Which you assumed without evidence.

lol "good luck"

I'm not saying any such law would be effective; which is why I won't assume he is talking only about laws.

[TheSanityAnnex]

This thread has a rail?

Oh yeah. Its about the coverage/not coverage of a stupid statement. Carry on.

smh
When the statement comes from the face of control who's poured hundreds of millions of dollars into his cause it's a bit more than a stupid statement.

[ChumpDumper]

When the statement comes from the face of control who's poured hundreds of millions of dollars into his cause it's a bit more than a stupid statement.How big should this story be?

Front page on every paper in the country?

Lead story on network news for a month of cycles?

Tell us.

[Th'Pusher]

This thread has a rail?

Oh yeah. Its about the coverage/not coverage of a stupid statement. Carry on.

smh

It does now that it has been clearly established TSAs argument was based on a complete straw man. Going off on a tangent about how liberals would have made a big deal about it if it had been said by a conservative is a clichéd point I don't think anyone would disagree or argue with.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Easy. Take the guns away from a larger demographic that includes the subset.

No racial component needed.

And that's only if you are talking about laws.

Which you assumed without evidence.

lol "good luck"

Try sticking to Bloomberg's parameters without being racist, since you think it wasn't racist and all.

[ChumpDumper]

Try sticking to Bloomberg's parameters without being racist, since you think it wasn't racist and all.That's just it.

If it's through law, there is no need to "stick" to any parameters. Why would you think a gun control advocate like Bloomberg would want to limit such a law?

But you can't even say for sure he is talking about laws.

Good luck.

[TheSanityAnnex]

That's just it.

If it's through law, there is no need to "stick" to any parameters. Why would you think a gun control advocate like Bloomberg would want to limit such a law?

But you can't even say for sure he is talking about laws.

Good luck.Bloomberg clearly defined a very specific group of people who he wants disarmed based on race. To argue that isn't racist is asinine.

[Blake]

they'd work, starving is painful and after 2 days without eating they'd show up at the camp to work and then they'd get fed.

If they're gonna show up on their own, why do you also want to have them hauled to the camp?

[Tuddy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP3HJVp3n9c

[ChumpDumper]

Bloomberg clearly defined a very specific group of people who he wants disarmed based on race. To argue that isn't racist is asinine.So he has to actively want this group to be murdered in order to not be thought of as racist.

lol

[Th'Pusher]

Bloomberg clearly defined a very specific group of people who he wants disarmed based on race. To argue that isn't racist is asinine.
Bloomberg has publicly supported gun control for all with no stipulations of race. Why wouldn't you just assume he believes strict gun control would keep guns out of the wrong hands of everyone regardless of race?

[m>s]

If they're gonna show up on their own, why do you also want to have them hauled to the camp?
war time economy != peacetime economy


I would do it dofferently today because america isn't at war. Those people were forced there for national security reasons just as much as economic ones.

[Fabbs]

Is this Night Shift Rumpy and the krew back?
Should this girl be allowed to have a gun?
http://acidcow.com/pics/20130718/lead_user_girls_guns_acme_03.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

Should this girl be allowed to have a gun?Don't know enough about her tbh.

Now let TSA continue his race bait attempts.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Bloomberg has publicly supported gun control for all with no stipulations of race. Why wouldn't you just assume he believes strict gun control would keep guns out of the wrong hands of everyone regardless of race?
Because he specifically named a certain demographic.

[Fabbs]

"Big Gun"

Riot on the radio
Pictures on the TV
Invader man take what he can
Shootout on the silver screen
Sticking 'em up and knocking 'em down
Living out a fantasy
There's a bad man cruising around
In a big black limousine
Don't let it be wrong
Don't let it be right
Get in his way
You're dead in his sights

[Chorus:]
Big gun
Big gun number one
Big gun
Big gun kick the hell out of you

Terminators, Uzi makers
Shootin' up Hollywood
Snakes alive with a .45
Gettin' off and doing no good
If you ain't wise they'll cannibalise
Tear flesh off you
Classified lady killers
Preyin' in the human zoo
They saddle you up
And take you to town
Better look out
When he come around

[Chorus]

Yeah
Show down
Ooooh yeah yeah
ye yeah yeah

Big gun
Big gun number one
mmmmmm
whoa whoa
yeah yeah
b - b - b - b - b - b - b
Big gun, got a hot one
Big gun, got a number one
Big gun, loaded and cocked
Big gun, hot hot hot
Got big gun, ready or not
Big gun, give it, give it a shot, c'mon

Terminator, Uzi makers
Regulators, gonna get you later

Big gun kick the hell out of you

[TheSanityAnnex]

Don't know enough about her tbh.

Now let TSA continue his race bait attempts.
What is this race bait angle you keep hinting at? I'm honestly confused.

[Fabbs]

http://acidcow.com/pics/20130718/lead_user_girls_guns_acme_19.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

What is this race bait angle you keep hinting at? I'm honestly confused.You honestly don't know what you're doing?

[TheSanityAnnex]

You honestly don't know what you're doing?
Concerning the race bait angle you are trying no, not a clue. What exactly about this do you think I'm "race baiting". Be specific.

[ChumpDumper]

Concerning the race bait angle you are trying no, not a clue. What exactly about this do you think I'm "race baiting". Be specific.
Seriously? You try to cry racism ten times and now you play dumb?

lol "angle"

[ElNono]

Fabbs raising da bar up in this bitch...

[Nero5]

I'll show you racist

Fuck off kike

YAY! the circle insult!
Still haven't learned anything new then.

[Nero5]

Because he specifically named a certain demographic.

You mean he said 'minorities'?

[Nero5]

No laws were discussed in the OP so no.


Should 15-25 year old males be disarmed based on the color of their skin?


Hmmm...how about 15 years olds should not be armed for any reason!

[Th'Pusher]

Because he specifically named a certain demographic.
He didn't name a specific demographic in the context of policy. That is your race baiting straw man that you continue to cling to.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He didn't name a specific demographic in the context of policy. That is your race baiting straw man that you continue to cling to.

Where did I ever mention policy?

[ChumpDumper]

Where did I ever mention policy?OK so Bloomberg is just making polite suggestions then, not calling for a removal of rights or disarming at all.

I'm glad you made yourself clear, TSA.

[TheSanityAnnex]

OK so Bloomberg is just making polite suggestions then, not calling for a removal of rights or disarming at all.

I'm glad you made yourself clear, TSA.
Polite suggestions don't get blocked from being aired.

[ChumpDumper]

Polite suggestions don't get blocked from being aired.You said he wasn't calling for any policy or law, so it can't be anything other than a suggestion.

And any speaker at that forum can request his speech not be released. Did you not read the article you posted?

[Blake]

yup I was right:
"By 1938, the crime rate was at an all-time low because repeat offenders were being sent to a concentration camp after they had completed their second sentence. Anyone who did not have a permanent address and some visible means of support was hauled off the Dachau and put to work."

:lol maybe Bloomberg can put the homeless to work :lmao


Job well done. Anyone here I dare you to try to logically explain why this isn't a good plan. Pro tip: you can't.

we were put here to work, and work we all must


war time economy != peacetime economy


I would do it dofferently today because america isn't at war. Those people were forced there for national security reasons just as much as economic ones.

Well that's one explanation for why it isn't a good plan.

[m>s]

No wartime plans aren't good for peacetime that's why mine is modified accordingly. You are one slow really stupid shit. McDonald's gave you too much lard on the brain or something.

[Winehole23]

who got silenced?

[Winehole23]

there's been lots of sulking about unfairness to racist right wingers, but nothing posted so far to show it. Bloomberg's partial off the record comments don't show it.

[Blake]

No wartime plans aren't good for peacetime
That's why mine is modified accordingly. You are one slow really stupid shit. McDonald's gave you too much lard on the brain or something.

Lol modified plan lol. Another term might be sidestep.

Lol slow.

[m>s]

Tigre such an intolerable faggot

fucking pussy

[Blake]

.

[Winehole23]

committed racialists have one very good reason to be resentful: their core beliefs are disreputable and invite obloquy. they seek to transfer the disgrace their own words and actions bring upon them, to the very people they would kill or subjugate given half the chance.

[m>s]

It's a good plan and it would work. Ugh you're a tiresome little shill-weenie.

[Blake]

It's a good plan and it would work. Ugh you're a tiresome little shill-weenie.

you also said it won't work today.

Pick a lane retard.

[Nero5]

committed racialists have one very good reason to be resentful: their core beliefs are disreputable and invite obloquy. they seek to transfer the disgrace their own words and actions bring upon them, to the very people they would kill or subjugate given half the chance.

Of course - the reaction of the weak minded and ignorant to opposition or for those who do not garner the support they feel entitled to is to become aggressive or offer violence. It's the sense of entitlement that we should look at closely, however this should be one of the great learnings we get from the National Socialists in Germany; they suppressed opposition including murdering those within their own system, distorted the legal system when they gained power and robbed millions of their wealth and this was before WW2 started. To look in a modern context we see similar things in many parts of the world, so the National Socialists did not invent the concepts, but they did sell it better.
However rather than obloquy (lovely word BTW) I feel it is also good to simply ridicule with the truth or their ignorance. Dear ol' MS has always given us such great material to work with: there was the propaganda video of the German invasion of Russia, one of the most singularly idiotic military decisions Hitler made in WW2. Yet all MS saw was the images of 'glory' that titillated, being ignorant of the history. His current video is also dripping with great irony, given the national socialists central banking policies in Germany and how the leadership of the Nazi party used it as their own personal cash cow. But then he does not read what he does not want to know and this is what you get. Even his favorite supposed insult of 'Kike' simply means 'circle' but is in historical terms an insult from one jew to a new jewish immigrant to indicate that he is illiterate/poorly educated - here you can see how the mirror of language reflects the inner fear. MS uses a term that perhaps best reflect him - but again he is not alone in this. We see it in the middle east, africa, europe where the weak and poorly educated want to gain power but cannot do so through merit. In such circumstances they will hate that they cannot and then will hate those than can and the 'system' that 'stops' them.

[m>s]

you also said it won't work today.

Pick a lane retard.
Stop putting words in my mouth just because I put my dick in yours. That plan was strategically brilliant for when it was intended, during wartime. My version would work during peacetime and could trim the national deficit by trillions over the course of a decade.

[Blake]

I dare you to try to logically explain why this isn't a good plan. Pro tip: you can't.



wartime plans aren't good for peacetime

These are your direct words out of your e-mouth.

Congrats on beating your dare

[m>s]

Was referring to the General concept not the exact implementation. Try to keep up.

[Blake]

Was referring to the General concept not the exact implementation. Try to keep up.

Nope. You goosestepped right along with that entire post.

[m>s]

Insufferable little ****

[Blake]

^^^ simple minded fool that talks out of his ass. Good for nothing but clowning.

[m>s]

Something is wrong with your brain dude - get help

[Blake]

Says the forum's aryan goosestepper

You're retarded, tbh.

[m>s]

Can't wait