Let's settle this once and for all...Is Parker a legitimate cancer?

[apalisoc_9]

I would like to see someone defend this..

Why is that when Parker runs the two man game between him and TD the spurs struggle offensively and are down in the first quarter?

19pts today...

In the two most recent games..Houston and Pels.

Tony was the one taking shots in the first quarter but the spurs ended up needing a run from the bench to get back on the game...

Why is this always the case?

Why is it when they run the two man game to starts the game the spurs are always playing catch up?

if the Enrique fan boys xan answer, maybe there won't be any Parker thread.

This should be the only Parker thread in the post-season IMO..

So lets talk bball.

[RD2191]

Yes.

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[RD2191]

He isn't even a good PG. He's an undersized SG if anything. He has no creativity with the ball.

[TheGreatYacht]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[apalisoc_9]

I promise I won't post anything bad about Parker anymore, if someone can answer.

Why does the team struggle when Tony tries so hard in the first quarter...

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[RD2191]

I promise I won't post anything bad about Parker anymore, if someone can answer.

Why does the team struggle when Tony tries so hard in the first quarter...

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[TheGreatYacht]

Let's settle this once and for all...

Is Duncan a stat padder on an average team, like you said?

[Spur|n|Austin]

Block time

[Russ]

There's something metastatic here.

But it's not Parker.

[Silver&Black]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

Jump straight to step 4 imo....

[apalisoc_9]

Fanboys without a legitimate argument.

[RD2191]

Lol. No answers from Porker fans.

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[RD2191]

Fanboys without a legitimate argument.

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[RD2191]

Lol. No answers from Porker fans.

[ChumpDumper]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[Clipper Nation]

Fanboys without a legitimate argument.

[apalisoc_9]

Lol. No answers from Porker fans.

Yup.

[Godbama]

Yes, but he's benign :)

[LongtimeSpursFan]

The motion offense is predicated on the ball beginning on one side of the floor to the other side. A big that can set screens but still has the ability to get to the rim or shoot the open J forces the other teams big to follow thus creating a lane to the basket that can no longer be defended. This open lane must be closed by opposing players sagging to help defend. Players that are sagging on D now leave perimeter players open for open shots from the three point line. When players are sagging to help with D they also turn their backs to their designated man they are guarding thus losing sight for split second. Ball movement after initial penetration forces opposing team to now switch players defending. An offensive team that can now move the ball around the perimeter or can cut to basket has the advantage to get an easier look thus increasing field goal percentage.
This is one of many possible scenarios that can occur when the motion offense is utilized. There is even great reward for using this type of offense when the offensive team possesses a PG that has the ability to get to rim or make a pass to another open player. Fortunately for the Spurs, and thus one of the reasons Spurs offense has been able to evolve in the past ten years is that they not only have a PG than can do this well but they also have a sixth man with similar ability.

[pgardn]

Let's settle this...?

You gotta be Fckn kidding OP.

So it's still not clear to you, you needed to start a new thread just to make sure because you were wavering?
OP has had ambivalent feelings about Parker, he's just not sure, please help him with this burning question to which he just can't make up his mind...

Two Pink Cream Pies in the face immediately, self inflicted.

[RD2191]

The motion offense is predicated on the ball beginning on one side of the floor to the other side. A big that can set screens but still has the ability to get to the rim or shoot the open J forces the other teams big to follow thus creating a lane to the basket that can no longer be defended. This open lane must be closed by opposing players sagging to help defend. Players that are sagging on D now leave perimeter players open for open shots from the three point line. When players are sagging to help with D they also turn their backs to their designated man they are guarding thus losing sight for split second. Ball movement after initial penetration forces opposing team to now switch players defending. An offensive team that can now move the ball around the perimeter or can cut to basket has the advantage to get an easier look thus increasing field goal percentage.
This is one of many possible scenarios that can occur when the motion offense is utilized. There is even great reward for using this type of offense when the offensive team possesses a PG that has the ability to get to rim or make a pass to another open player. Fortunately for the Spurs, and thus one of the reasons Spurs offense has been able to evolve in the past ten years is that they not only have a PG than can do this well but they also have a sixth man with similar ability.
That's great and all if Parker would actually pass the ball.

[Cry Havoc]

No.

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[Silver&Black]

Parker living in OPs mind rent free....

[Lerojo]

You might be right about Parker, but it's the constant shitposts and new threads like this that are the legitimate cancers.

Stop spamming so much, and just use one thread only or something for fucks sake..

[apalisoc_9]

:wow

No one can come up with one decent argument.

[ChumpDumper]

End thread.

Retire shtick.

Kill yourself.

[Arc]

our offense wasn't the problem tonight. we shot 57 goddamn percent ffs. we scored 103 points, which is usually enough to beat anyone.

the problem was on defense.

[milkyway21]

Lol :lol

Why there's always Like this when Kawhi goes M.I.A. in the game??? :lmao

[RD2191]

:wow

No one can come up with one decent argument.

[ChumpDumper]

OP is a legitimate cancer.

[Henrik Sedin]

If TP was a cancer, how did he get a finals MVP?

[LongtimeSpursFan]

our offense wasn't the problem tonight. we shot 57 goddamn percent ffs. we scored 103 points, which is usually enough to beat anyone.

the problem was on defense.

The way NO was hitting their shots I don't think anyone could have beaten them tonight. It's one loss out of what...last 13. Not a big deal. Yes they lost home court advantage but that one loss could have happened anywhere in their 12. I still think this Spurs team is playing the best basketball and should be favorites to win.

[Dingle Barry]

The motion offense is predicated on the ball beginning on one side of the floor to the other side. A big that can set screens but still has the ability to get to the rim or shoot the open J forces the other teams big to follow thus creating a lane to the basket that can no longer be defended. This open lane must be closed by opposing players sagging to help defend. Players that are sagging on D now leave perimeter players open for open shots from the three point line. When players are sagging to help with D they also turn their backs to their designated man they are guarding thus losing sight for split second. Ball movement after initial penetration forces opposing team to now switch players defending. An offensive team that can now move the ball around the perimeter or can cut to basket has the advantage to get an easier look thus increasing field goal percentage.
This is one of many possible scenarios that can occur when the motion offense is utilized. There is even great reward for using this type of offense when the offensive team possesses a PG that has the ability to get to rim or make a pass to another open player. Fortunately for the Spurs, and thus one of the reasons Spurs offense has been able to evolve in the past ten years is that they not only have a PG than can do this well but they also have a sixth man with similar ability.
Good lord. Mix in a fuckin paragraph.

[Dingle Barry]

If TP was a cancer, how did he get a finals MVP?

Cancer is the mvp of final, tbh

[Sean Cagney]

The way NO was hitting their shots I don't think anyone could have beaten them tonight. It's one loss out of what...last 13. Not a big deal. Yes they lost home court advantage but that one loss could have happened anywhere in their 12. I still think this Spurs team is playing the best basketball and should be favorites to win.

I don't know about them being the faves to win it all but they are definitely considered. I would say GSW are the faves because of HC and they were solid this year from beginning to end pretty much but the Spurs have to be up there spite the loss tonight. They played great for the last month or so of the season, fact.

[SanAntonioSpurs23]

Everyone not named Tim Duncan is a cancer to the team.

:lol fake star Leonard
:lol Enrique
:lol Manure