PDA

View Full Version : Why no Patty to close out?



pookenstein
04-29-2015, 12:56 AM
Why didn't Pop sub in Patty when LA had to foul us at the end? Parker had missed one and Patty had ice in his veins the last time he had to make FT's under pressure in game two. This is absolutely no bash on TP (as sad as it is that I have to say this).

Thank god Manu, Danny and Kawhi secured that Green miss. Big play.

N0 LyF3 ScRuB
04-29-2015, 12:58 AM
Why are you bitching when we won? It worked.

Keepin' it real
04-29-2015, 12:59 AM
Why are you bitching when we won? It worked.

Blue Duck
04-29-2015, 01:20 AM
It's not bitching, its a legitimate question. Patty is playing with confidence and he is completely unphased by the moment. No bashing, no bitching, he's earned a place at the table. It's not about the past, it's all about right now....

RD2191
04-29-2015, 01:21 AM
Parker did okay there in the end but I was asking the same thing. Mills was playing very well.

Mr. Body
04-29-2015, 01:22 AM
I agree. Especially when their defense firmed up at the end, we got Danny Green having to force a mid-range and Kawhi also forcing. It would be nice to have a guy with dribble up range like Mills.

Holden_Caulfield
04-29-2015, 01:22 AM
because parker is a better ball handler

Nathan89
04-29-2015, 01:25 AM
Mills should've been in at the end. Parker should've faked an injury at 48seconds when he got fouled to have a better shooter take them.

Nathan89
04-29-2015, 01:26 AM
because parker is a better ball handler

We passed it in to Danny Green.

marinoman
04-29-2015, 01:26 AM
Ball handling. But still I agree with you. And more patty throughout the game less Parker or green, preferably green

LoneStarState'sPride
04-29-2015, 01:26 AM
Because Pop is smarter than you.

cjw
04-29-2015, 01:28 AM
We passed it in to Danny Green.

And it was a great look. Parker played well enough to win, so I'm not gonna complain. My question was more on D. All the PGs are subpar there including CoJo's performance so far.

pookenstein
04-29-2015, 02:21 AM
I'm not bitching, just asking a q. Obviously Pop is smarter than me (probably not only in BBall related things), but putting in the player who hasn't missed a FT the whole series to ice a very important game doesn't seem to be stupid either. Especially knowing how Patty closed G2.

And yes, Parker is a better ball handler, but Mills is quicker. Might have taken a Little bit extra time off the clock.

Thank god, it played out. Now close that shit on thursday.

mudyez
04-29-2015, 02:27 AM
There wouldn't have been a problem with Parker+Mills on the floor together.

Lerojo
04-29-2015, 02:30 AM
Patty had some big defensive lapses, but his offence and hustle made up for it. Not sure why cojo wasn't used for his defence in some parts.