The Lakers Are Directly Responsible For 60% Of The Spurs Not Repeating In Title Years

[Koolaid_Man]

I got to 60% by virtue of the Lakers beating the Spurs directly or winning the title during a Spurs repeat attempt .

Nice analysis by Kool....:toast

99 spurs win *
2000 the Lakers win title..
2003 spurs win
2004 Lakers beat Spurs
2005 Spurs win
2006 Lost to Dallas
2007 Spurs win
2008 Lost to Lakers
2014 Spurs win
2015 Spurs lose to LA

[Silver&Black]

Good luck with those lottery balls Kool....

[DarrinS]

AssMambaFan is a most insecure creature

[elmanutres]

tim went out with an injury in 2000. didnt even play in the playoffs

either way, apparently a lockout title doesnt count according to you guys, so technically the lakers winning in 2000 doesn't matter regardless of tims injury cause if the spurs won in 2000 it still wouldn't be a repeat. No double standards

[midnightpulp]

Good luck in the lottery, Kool :toast

[KaiRMD1]

The pure definition of irrelevant is the Lakers

[Strange Love]

Time to go back to jacking off to pale white, no ass having Hathaway while watching those ping pong balls not falll your way again, kool.

[TDMVPDPOY]

Time to go back to jacking off to pale white, no ass having Hathaway while watching those ping pong balls not falll your way again, kool.

thai ping pong? :D

[whitemamba]

kobe repeated twice in the "poop and Jim era"

[SnakeBoy]

The only thing that matters...

99 spurs win
2000 the Lakers win title..
2003 spurs win
2004 Lakers beat Spurs
2005 Spurs win
2006 Lost to Dallas
2007 Spurs win
2008 Lost to Lakers
2014 Spurs win
2015 Spurs lose to LA

[Koolaid_Man]

They won all their titles on down years of the NBA