The official dumb but hilarious ambchang takes thread

[Alex's foreskin]

Not because Delladova is better than Irving as a player, it's because it means more of the offense goes through Lebron, and Delladova focuses on nothing BUT defense, which he is better than Irving at.
.

Feel free to add

:lmao Delladova better than Irving

[Mitch]

Chang will defend anything he says to the death. Right or wrong

[LkrFan]

Tim Cuckan losing $25 million is chump change
This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a fucken gym he clearly don't fucken use:

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp%20duncan/tattoo2.jpg

** "Here, Everybody's a Bitch"
:rollin :lmao :rollin

[K...]

That's true. You must understand the power of LeBron to see. On paper it's ridiculous. But if we assume LeBron has infinite energy he's right. Simple economics. LeBron has a competitive advantage with offense so he should maximize that. Delly is not add good as LeBron on d but it's most efficient to have him max d.

A comparable line-up would be Irving as first option offense with LeBron as defense. If they weren't playing the mvp that might sense but I'd prefer the line-up which guards the opponents best player with a specialist. Plus Irving was injured so it's a moot issue

[Killakobe81]

OP All you are doing is sparking a Kobe bash thread of some sort ...
We will see some passive aggressive thread with some obscure numbers to support a player he like Lebron/Duncan/Moses /bird and bash Kobe.

[ambchang]

Feel free to add

:lmao Delladova better than Irving

That's pretty butt hurt of you.

But people who view this as Delladova > Irving is missing the point, it's actually Lebron > Irving, which is true.

Having everything go through Lebron is always the best way to run things, the problem is that it is unsustainable due to exhaustion. In the course of a series though, it is doable (proven), and it makes the Cavs a better team.

The Cavs would be even better off with another defensive minded G in the series, if they can have someone like Tony Allen or Mike Conley in place of Dova, they win the series.

Irving takes away Lebron's offensive touches, and is mediocre defensively. He's great as a sidekick in the regular season to relieve pressure for Lebron on offense, but in the playoffs against a good team, he could be easily neutralized.

[ambchang]

This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a fucken gym he clearly don't fucken use:

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp%20duncan/tattoo2.jpg

** "Here, Everybody's a Bitch"
:rollin :lmao :rollin

This is just low, man, putting in a fake quote with no links whatsoever, and making this the opposite of what I said.


You know you are a boss when you lost $25m and doesn't bat an eyelash.

"Yeah, it's a lot of change, but it doesn't affect me", I mean, how boss do you have to be and just brush $25m off your shoulders?

Some people are slaves to money and fame, Duncan clearly isn't, but he still is worth more than half the planet added together.

Respect.


The point was, it wasn't chump change, and he still didn't really care that much.

That's boss.

[ambchang]

OP All you are doing is sparking a Kobe bash thread of some sort ...
We will see some passive aggressive thread with some obscure numbers to support a player he like Lebron/Duncan/Moses /bird and bash Kobe.

I think you are reversing the issue.

But I'd be interested in seeing my assertion of having to maximize Lebron on a series is better than having him share workload with Irving.

[Clipper Nation]

This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a fucken gym he clearly don't fucken use:

http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x282/duncan228/temp%20duncan/tattoo2.jpg

** "Here, Everybody's a Bitch"
:rollin :lmao :rollin
"LOL NBA - Lakers are back in the hunt"

Oh wait, that was you, not Amb :downspin:

[LkrFan]

This is just low, man, putting in a fake quote with no links whatsoever, and making this the opposite of what I said.

:lol

[LkrFan]

"LOL NBA - Lakers are back in the hunt"

Oh wait, that was you, not Amb :downspin:

:lmao

[LkrFan]

This is just low, man, putting in a fake quote with no links whatsoever, and making this the opposite of what I said.


You know you are a boss when you lost $25m and doesn't bat an eyelash.

Sounds like you are implying that losing $25 million to Duncan't is nothing, because he is such a boss. Amirite? :downspin:

[ambchang]

Sounds like you are implying that losing $25 million to Duncan't is nothing, because he is such a boss. Amirite? :downspin:

How did I imply that? I specifically said the direct opposite.

What is true though is that you put in fake quotes. Now you try to spin it.

It's just a disgusting display of spinelessness from you. I already had low expectations for kobestans, but you went through that like Kobe through a shower stall.

[Killakobe81]

How did I imply that? I specifically said the direct opposite.

What is true though is that you put in fake quotes. Now you try to spin it.

It's just a disgusting display of spinelessness from you. I already had low expectations for kobestans, but you went through that like Kobe through a shower stall.

As expected ...

[LkrFan]

How did I imply that? I specifically said the direct opposite.

What is true though is that you put in fake quotes. Now you try to spin it.

It's just a disgusting display of spinelessness from you. I already had low expectations for kobestans, but you went through that like Kobe through a shower stall.

You said he lost all that dough and didn't bat an eye. That's an implication son.

For the millionth time, I'm a Laker Fan who roots for Kobe because he IS a Laker. Name on the front > names on the back.

Why so sensitive? You guys :downspin: and twist shit ALL THE TIME around these parts. When I do it you :cry about it? -15 points for being a sensitive little short ass farming beotch. :lol

[StrengthAndHonor]

Ambchang's "Pierce has not been a good defender in his career" take is probably one of the worst I've read from him.

[ambchang]

You said he lost all that dough and didn't bat an eye. That's an implication son.

For the millionth time, I'm a Laker Fan who roots for Kobe because he IS a Laker. Name on the front > names on the back.

Why so sensitive? You guys :downspin: and twist shit ALL THE TIME around these parts. When I do it you :cry about it? -15 points for being a sensitive little short ass farming beotch. :lol

Can you not read? I specifically said it is a lot of cash.

Some people do not look at money as be all and end all, they know what is enough, and even though they lost a lot, they still realize they have more than enough.

[ambchang]

Ambchang's "Pierce has not been a good defender in his career" take is probably one of the worst I've read from him.

I agree, that was bad on my part.

[LkrFan]

Can you not read? I specifically said it is a lot of cash.

Some people do not look at money as be all and end all, they know what is enough, and even though they lost a lot, they still realize they have more than enough.

Yes, I can read :lol Did you not say "he wouldn't bat an eyelash" even though he lost all that money? ImplicationPERIOD.

I think even Jerry Jones, Mark Cuban, or Donald Trump would be PISSED if they lost $25 million. For you to imply that BAD (Broke Ass Duncan) wouldn't bat an eyelash from losing that kind of cash is stupid. Own your stupidity and we'll move on. :)

[StrengthAndHonor]

I agree, that was bad on my part.
Overall though you're good and I respect you, except when you somehow reel Kobe in the conversation lol.

[Killakobe81]

Overall though you're good and I respect you, except when you somehow reel Kobe in the conversation lol.

x1000, problem is, it happens to often.

[ambchang]

Yes, I can read :lol Did you not say "he wouldn't bat an eyelash" even though he lost all that money? ImplicationPERIOD.

I think even Jerry Jones, Mark Cuban, or Donald Trump would be PISSED if they lost $25 million. For you to imply that BAD (Broke Ass Duncan) wouldn't bat an eyelash from losing that kind of cash is stupid. Own your stupidity and we'll move on. :)

No, not really. This will be the THIRD time I post it. You have ADHD or something? You have trouble reading more than one sentence at a time?


You know you are a boss when you lost $25m and doesn't bat an eyelash.

"Yeah, it's a lot of change, but it doesn't affect me", I mean, how boss do you have to be and just brush $25m off your shoulders?

Some people are slaves to money and fame, Duncan clearly isn't, but he still is worth more than half the planet added together.

Respect.


The point was, it wasn't chump change, and he still didn't really care that much.

That's boss.

And no, Duncan didn't bat an eyelash, he clearly stated that it's not affecting his decision. He didn't like losing $25M, but it's fine with him because he has enough, and he knows it.

That's boss.

[da_suns_fan]

Duncan was as dominant as Shaq. :lol

"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"

[ambchang]

Duncan was as dominant as Shaq. :lol

"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"

They are true though. I can't help it that you can't understand them.

[LkrFan]

No, not really. This will be the THIRD time I post it. You have ADHD or something? You have trouble reading more than one sentence at a time?





And no, Duncan didn't bat an eyelash, he clearly stated that it's not affecting his decision. He didn't like losing $25M, but it's fine with him because he has enough, and he knows it.

That's boss.

You are wrong for the 3rd time. But I keep forgetting. English is your 2nd language. You don't know any better. I forgive you son. :lol

[ambchang]

You are wrong for the 3rd time. But I keep forgetting. English is your 2nd language. You don't know any better. I forgive you son. :lol

Wow, you mean English is your 1st language and you can't figure out "wasn't" is the opposite of "was"?

I mean, seriously, I said, explicitly, " it wasn't chump change", and you, with your 1st language ability, directly interpreted that I said "it was chump change"?

Shouldn't you be embarrassed by it now? Getting lectured on your own language by a foreigner?

Are you good at anything? Anything at all? I mean, what the hell?

So when I said "Kobe is NOT a top 10 player of all time", do you read it as me saying "Kobe is a top 10 player of all time"?

[Alex's foreskin]

They are true though. I can't help it that you can't understand them.

Duncan was never as dominant in his peak as Shaq.

[Clipper Nation]

Duncan was as dominant as Shaq. :lol

"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"
Dudley > Melo :lmao

"Look at these advanced stats I copy-pasted because they made my mancrush look good!"

[m>s]

That's pretty bad, I think cavs win with a healthy Irving. Make curry work on the other end.

[ambchang]

Duncan was never as dominant in his peak as Shaq.

Numbers say otherwise.

Whether you define dominance as absolute or an optical effect is up for debate though.

[ambchang]

That's pretty bad, I think cavs win with a healthy Irving. Make curry work on the other end.

Curry won't guard him as the series go on.

[Alex's foreskin]

Numbers say otherwise.

Whether you define dominance as absolute or an optical effect is up for debate though.

No. Duncan was never as dominant, numbers or optical. Not in their peak.

[ambchang]

No. Duncan was never as dominant, numbers or optical. Not in their peak.

Numbers say otherwise. Duncan matched shaqs dominance if you factor in both offense and defense along with pace.

[Alex's foreskin]

Numbers say otherwise. Duncan matched shaqs dominance if you factor in both offense and defense along with pace.
:lol so he wasn't as dominant on offense without factoring those in? Got it :lmao

[ambchang]

:lol so he wasn't as dominant on offense without factoring those in? Got it :lmao

Players can't be dominant defensively?

With this and the Irving topic, I just realized I'm talking to a retard.

[Alex's foreskin]

Players can't be dominant defensively?

With this and the Irving topic, I just realized I'm talking to a retard.

So when someone says "dominant in their peak" they are usually referring to defense? :lmao STFU

[ambchang]

So when someone says "dominant in their peak" they are usually referring to defense? :lmao STFU

Dominant is an entire game. Not just offense.

If you want to talk about dominant offensively, you say dominant offensively.

[Alex's foreskin]

Dominant is an entire game. Not just offense.

If you want to talk about dominant offensively, you say dominant offensively.

Which Duncan still wasn't as dominant as Shaq.

[unleashbaynes]

Arguing semantics over the definition of the word "dominant". Definitely not reaching at all.

[ambchang]

Which Duncan still wasn't as dominant as Shaq.

Duncan led the league in ws twice, bpm and vorp once each, drating three times, all during shaqs prime.
Shaq led the league in ws twice, bpm twice, vorp once and never in drating and orating.


Arguing semantics over the definition of the word "dominant". Definitely not reaching at all.

Yes, because I never thought people would ever think ignoring half the court in comparing players dominance.

[unleashbaynes]

talking to the other dipshit

[ohmwrecker]

Duncan was never as dominant in his peak as Shaq.

Not as dominant, just a better basketball player.

[Alex's foreskin]

Duncan led the league in ws twice, bpm and vorp once each, drating three times, all during shaqs prime.
Shaq led the league in ws twice, bpm twice, vorp once and never in drating and orating.



Yes, because I never thought people would ever think ignoring half the court in comparing players dominance.

And Shaq shot 58% for his career. Duncan?

[ambchang]

And Shaq shot 58% for his career. Duncan?

Tyson chandler shot 59% for his career, was he dominant.

What other criteria are you going to come up with? I'm waiting for you to say shaq is more dominant because he had the hairier ass crack the last time you checked.

[hater]

Lollard better than Irving :lol

[StrengthAndHonor]

Lollard better than Irving :lol
Wall better than Irving

:lol

[Alex's foreskin]

Tyson chandler shot 59% for his career, was he dominant.

What other criteria are you going to come up with? I'm waiting for you to say shaq is more dominant because he had the hairier ass crack the last time you checked.

Tyson Chandler averaged 5.6. Shot attempts for his career. Shaq averaged 16. Shut your simple ass up :lmao

[hater]

Wall better than Irving

:lol

:lmao

[Alex's foreskin]

:lmao John Wall's orating barely above 100.

:lmao Kyrie worth more wins than Wall

:lmao Kyrie worth more wins Lillard in the playoffs

:lmao shitty shitty ambchang.

[ambchang]

Tyson Chandler averaged 5.6. Shot attempts for his career. Shaq averaged 16. Shut your simple ass up :lmao

Now FGA matters? Could you list out all the criteria you consider for dominance? You just like to randomly pull things out.

So far, we have:
1) It's strictly offensive, defense doesn't count
2) FG%, but must be in combination with FGA
3) Looks like it

What else is there? Does a player has to be 300lbs or over, has the initials S.O., uses his mother's maiden name for his last name, require an apostrophe in his name?

When numbers don't support you, just pull up weird random things.

[ambchang]

:lmao

Do you have anything to add other than emoticons? When somebody else is doing your work, just lay low, avoid the attention and go for the ride instead of showing the world how ridiculously incompetent you are at it.


:lmao John Wall's orating barely above 100.

Irving's Drating is 108



:lmao Kyrie worth more wins than Wall

As a sidekick to Lebron when Lebron draws almost all the attention.

Not to mention Wall has higher BPM and VORP, and Irving has yet to register a single season with a +ve DBPM.


:lmao Kyrie worth more wins Lillard in the playoffs

Again, as a side kick to Lebron, playing against juggernauts like the Celtics, Bulls and Hawks, while the Blazers played against the Grizzlies.

Not to mention Lebron dragged the Cavs there in the first place, and then round after round. We all know how Irving fared as the first option, missing playoffs, much lower WS, much lower ORating (wow, Lebron on your team helps your offense? Really?)


:lmao shitty shitty ambchang.

Because?