PDA

View Full Version : Bernie now wants the taxpayer to be forced at gunpoint to fund his campaign



Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:02 PM
Just out of curiosity, what does he expect to do when he runs out of other people's money to spend during his theoretical presidency?

http://commondreams.org/news/2015/08/03/topple-us-oligarchy-sanders-calls-publicly-financed-elections

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 05:05 PM
You should try calming down, cuckservative.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:07 PM
You should try calming down, cuckservative.
I'm perfectly calm, David. Why are you so mad?

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 05:09 PM
I'm perfectly calm, David. Why are you so mad?You're the one making shit up, David.

Just take a moment and try to relax, cuckservatve.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:13 PM
You're the one making shit up, David.

Just take a moment and try to relax, cuckservatve.
I'm not making anything up, David. Bernie wants publicly-funded elections - in other words, funded by the taxation that the state enforces via its monopoly on violence (which "at gunpoint" is a metaphor for).

Just like his libcuck supporters, Bernie wants handouts since he can't earn shit on his own merit.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 05:16 PM
I'm not making anything up, David. Bernie wants publicly-funded elections - in other words, funded by the taxation that the state enforces via its monopoly on violence (which "at gunpoint" is a metaphor for).

Just like his libcuck supporters, Bernie wants handouts since he can't earn shit on his own merit.Such angry language, David.

:cry at gunpoint :cry

Poor cuckservative.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:28 PM
Such angry language, David.

:cry at gunpoint :cry

Poor cuckservative.
Such defensiveness, David.

:cry You're angry because I said so! :cry

:cry cuckservative :cry

Poor libcuck.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 05:30 PM
Such defensiveness, David.

:cry You're angry because I said so! :cry

:cry cuckservative :cry

Poor libcuck.Ah, there's the angry copycat comeback we've all come to expect from you, David.

Poor cuckservative. You're having a bad day because big bad Bernie scared you.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:35 PM
Ah, there's the angry copycat comeback we've all come to expect from you, David.

Poor cuckservative. You're having a bad day because big bad Bernie scared you.
Not scared at all, David. You're the one who went storming right into the thread immediately getting all defensive while accusing me of being "mad." I get it - you don't like when liberals get criticized, so you do everything you can to derail those threads, but it's a pretty pathetic schtick that shows who the angry one actually is.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 05:36 PM
Not scared at all, David. You're the one who went storming right into the thread immediately getting all defensive while accusing me of being "mad." I get it - you don't like when liberals get criticized, so you do everything you can to derail those threads, but it's a pretty pathetic schtick that shows who the angry one actually is.You started a thread because Bernie Sanders made you angry, David. I get it.

spurraider21
08-03-2015, 05:56 PM
"You're a libcuck, David"

"You're a cuckservative, David"

riveting

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 05:58 PM
You started a thread because Bernie Sanders made you angry, David. I get it.
By your own logic, you are "angry at" and "scared of" gun owners, Trann Coulter, and Ron Paul, David.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237877

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204576

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198382

Blizzardwizard
08-03-2015, 06:00 PM
You love this 'holding someone at gunpoint' expression don't ya?

The irony of that coming from a conservative :lol

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:04 PM
By your own logic, you are "angry at" and "scared of" gun owners, Trann Coulter, and Ron Paul, David.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237877

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204576

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198382A thread from three years ago is sure telling me.

But if you are admitting to being angry when you've started every thread you've ever posted, I believe you, David.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:07 PM
A thread from three years ago is sure telling me.

But if you are admitting to being angry when you've started every thread you've ever posted, I believe you, David.
You started threads about them, David. By your own logic, that means they made you angry and scared. So let's review who you're scared of:

- People who exercise their constitutional rights, the vast majority of whom are peaceful and law-abiding.

- A skeletal, gaunt transvestite.

- A 79-year-old man.

Wow David, you truly are a pussy. You probably want the government to protect you from your own shadow, too.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:09 PM
You started threads about them, David. By your own logic, that means they made you angry and scared. So let's review who you're scared of:

- People who exercise their constitutional rights, the vast majority of whom are peaceful and law-abiding.

- A skeletal, gaunt transvestite.

- A 79-year-old man.

Wow David, you truly are a pussy. You probably want the government to protect you from your own shadow, too.Actually, I played the victim in none of those threads, David.

You portrayed yourself as being held at gunpoint.





























By Bernie Sanders.


























































You're a pussy, David.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:14 PM
I already explained the title of the thread to you, David.

Keep being afraid and shook of "gun nuts," trannies and septuagenarians, David. I'm assuming your last name is Gest? Because you seem like the type who would get the shit beaten out of him by Liza Minelli.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:15 PM
I already explained the title of the thread to you, David.

Keep being afraid and shook of "gun nuts," trannies and septuagenarians, David. I'm assuming your last name is Gest? Because you seem like the type who would get the shit beaten out of him by Liza Minelli.You're the real victim here, David.

lol cuckservative.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:22 PM
:cry law abiding citizen :cry

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtLF9kLCIAI3SyS.jpg

lol CN's 2nd amendment hero.

vy65
08-03-2015, 06:35 PM
Cumchuggars breakdown is pretty sad to see.

It's like a malfunctioning robot who can only repeat shitty catch phrases like "cuckservative," and "playing the victim" and "men don't get pregnant." Smh.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:37 PM
Cumchuggars breakdown is pretty sad to see.

It's like a malfunctioning robot who can only repeat shitty catch phrases like "cuckservative," and "playing the victim" and "men don't get pregnant." Smh.Any post of yours is pretty sad to see tbh.

vy65
08-03-2015, 06:38 PM
Any post of yours is pretty sad to see tbh.

Wow. Amazing post.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:39 PM
Wow. Amazing post.As is yours. Groundbreaking butthurt.

Big Dog
08-03-2015, 06:39 PM
:lol Using a term made popular by a fucking salon article.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:41 PM
:lol Using a term made popular by a fucking salon article.It was popular before that #thereisathingcalledtwitter.

vy65
08-03-2015, 06:41 PM
I'm a middle aged man who acts like chronically offended 14 year old girl

vy65
08-03-2015, 06:42 PM
inb4 cumchugger does exactly what I just did, quoting vy

Big Dog
08-03-2015, 06:44 PM
inb4 cumchugger does exactly what I just did, quoting vy
inb4 ur inb4

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:45 PM
lol I really pissed this middle aged guy off since I refused to let him play the victim in his men's rights crusade.

Sorry dude, try acting like a man for a change.

vy65
08-03-2015, 06:50 PM
I try to deflect how big of an asshurt pussy I am by calling everyone else asshurt pussies

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:50 PM
:cry law abiding citizen :cry

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtLF9kLCIAI3SyS.jpg

lol CN's 2nd amendment hero.
http://i.imgur.com/pi6Wygg.jpg

lol David
lol Gest

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:51 PM
I'll let your asshurt speak for itself. You'll certainly post more of it.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:52 PM
:lol Using a term made popular by a fucking salon article.
Go easy on David, he's not too bright. He thinks Salon is real news as opposed to an SJW crock of shit.

m>s
08-03-2015, 06:52 PM
You're the one making shit up, David.

Just take a moment and try to relax, cuckservatve.
You're misusing the word David . A cuckservative is a soft ass race traitor. None of the board conservatives except cobra are race traitors.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:53 PM
Go easy on David, he's not too bright. He thinks Salon is real news as opposed to an SJW crock of shit.Aw, you're still mad, David. You think Trump is a conservative.


You're misusing the word David . A cuckservative is a soft ass race traitor. None of the board conservatives except cobra are race traitors.lol trying to take credit for a hashtag, David.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:53 PM
I'll let your asshurt speak for itself. You'll certainly post more of it.
You won't let anything speak for itself, David. You'll continue to parrot in response to everyone's posts in this thread, since your life is consumed by getting the last word on a message board.

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 06:54 PM
ChumDuncer has a new favorite word. Cool

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 06:55 PM
ChumDuncer has a new favorite word. CoolAngry board conservative line forms on the right.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 06:55 PM
^

You won't let anything speak for itself, David. You'll continue to parrot in response to everyone's posts in this thread, since your life is consumed by getting the last word on a message board.
Right as usual.

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 06:56 PM
Angry board conservative line forms on the right.

No anger here. More like extreme apathy.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:01 PM
^

Right as usual.I said his asshurt can speak for itself, but yours already has tbh.


No anger here. More like extreme apathy.That was easily overcome by your desire to post about me.

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 07:07 PM
I said his asshurt can speak for itself, but yours already has tbh.

That was easily overcome by your desire to post about me.

Which one of us is angry?

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:09 PM
Which one of us is angry?Whatever is compelling you to post about me, it ain't apathy.

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 07:11 PM
Whatever is compelling you to post about me, it ain't apathy.

Meh, just pointing out that there is no argument too small for you to take on. Soldier on, I guess

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:12 PM
Meh, just pointing out that there is no argument too small for you to take on. Soldier on, I guessThere are plenty or arguments I don't take on. Keep posting about me out of extreme apathy, I guess.

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 07:23 PM
There are plenty or arguments I don't take on. Keep posting about me out of extreme apathy, I guess.

Good example

boutons_deux
08-03-2015, 07:26 PM
Just out of curiosity, what does he expect to do when he runs out of other people's money to spend during his theoretical presidency?

http://commondreams.org/news/2015/08/03/topple-us-oligarchy-sanders-calls-publicly-financed-elections

gun? what gun?

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:31 PM
Good exampleOf your extreme apathy?

DarrinS
08-03-2015, 07:34 PM
Of your extreme apathy?

You win

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:35 PM
You winWin what?

boutons_deux
08-03-2015, 07:38 PM
collecting taxes is "violence"? rightwingnuts!

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 07:41 PM
Win what?
The Faggot of the Year award.

http://i.imgur.com/DEO2JC7.jpg

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:42 PM
The Faggot of the Year award.

http://i.imgur.com/DEO2JC7.jpglol so angry you can't even stay on your own topic.

Clipper Nation
08-03-2015, 07:44 PM
lol so angry you can't even stay on your own topic.
Not angry at all, David. The article is in the OP for anyone who wants to read it.

lol making another thread about yourself again, then blaming others for it.

ChumpDumper
08-03-2015, 07:45 PM
Not angry at all, David. The article is in the OP for anyone who wants to read it.

lol making another thread about yourself again, then blaming others for it.lol David -- all you do is talk about me.

In multiple threads.

Every day.

Big Dog
08-03-2015, 07:49 PM
The Faggot of the Year award.

http://i.imgur.com/DEO2JC7.jpg
:lmao..

vy65
08-03-2015, 09:23 PM
Apparently responding to posts on a political discussion board = salty/asshurt/angry

DMX7
08-03-2015, 09:45 PM
You love this 'holding someone at gunpoint' expression don't ya?

The irony of that coming from a conservative :lol

So many of them have a gun fetish.

spurraider21
08-03-2015, 09:51 PM
Apparently responding to posts on a political discussion board = salty/asshurt/angry
^scared

TheSanityAnnex
08-03-2015, 10:16 PM
Apparently responding to posts on a political discussion board = salty/asshurt/angry
^
imagining chumpdumper sodomy

vy65
08-03-2015, 10:32 PM
^scared

lol David -- all you do is talk about me.

In multiple threads.

Every day.

vy65
08-03-2015, 10:34 PM
^
imagining chumpdumper sodomy

I'll let your asshurt speak for itself. You'll certainly post more of it.

spurraider21
08-03-2015, 10:38 PM
lol David -- all you do is talk about me.

In multiple threads.

Every day.
Who's David?

You're the one who keeps posting scared, David.

vy65
08-03-2015, 10:56 PM
Who's David?

You're the one who keeps posting scared, David.

Ah, there's the angry copycat comeback we've all come to expect from you, David.

Poor cuckservative. You're having a bad day because big bad Bernie scared you.

TheSanityAnnex
08-03-2015, 11:46 PM
I'll let your asshurt speak for itself. You'll certainly post more of it.

Why are you always talking about male ass? It's okay if you like that, I'm not here to judge.

ChumpDumper
08-04-2015, 12:05 AM
lol it raelly does speak for itself tbh

TeyshaBlue
08-04-2015, 07:11 AM
Btw, Bernie's correct.

diego
08-04-2015, 01:11 PM
Just out of curiosity, what does he expect to do when he runs out of other people's money to spend during his theoretical presidency?

http://commondreams.org/news/2015/08/03/topple-us-oligarchy-sanders-calls-publicly-financed-elections

What does his theoretical presidency have to do with public campaign finance vs corporations owning your politicians?

Spurminator
08-04-2015, 02:23 PM
See, there's this thing called a "budget."

In a publicly-funded election, a candidate would have a certain amount of public money earmarked to spend on his campaign. In all likelihood, he would still be able to collect small private donations from supporters. When put together, that's his "budget."

His campaign team would take this "budget" and plan out how that money would be spent in the most strategic way to influence voters to choose their candidate. They do this by negotiating "costs." Since they know the election date is November 4th, they can create a strategic plan to maximize the impact of their spend over time until Election Day.

If they "run out of money" as you say, they probably didn't do a good job of planning out their costs. In all likelihood, someone probably made an error in calculating costs. So that person would probably be fired, and the rest of the team would need to rally to collect more private donations in order to make up for the error.

Hope that helps explain. Let me know if you have any questions.

boutons_deux
08-04-2015, 02:51 PM
Bernie is asking for campaign finance reform, and the Repugs, as long as they control Congress, will block ANY reform.

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 05:32 PM
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/11027520_10154123065752908_638963177711294641_n.pn g?oh=1b5853bb2507c099ebba9c4af8fea317&oe=5644F790

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 05:50 PM
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/11027520_10154123065752908_638963177711294641_n.pn g?oh=1b5853bb2507c099ebba9c4af8fea317&oe=5644F790
Bernie really is stupid. Someone voluntarily giving money to a campaign is not "legalized bribery." He, on the other hand, wants the taxpayer to be forced by the state to subsidize his campaign whether they support him or not, which is immoral.

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 06:04 PM
Bernie really is stupid. Someone voluntarily giving money to a campaign is not "legalized bribery." He, on the other hand, wants the taxpayer to be forced by the state to subsidize his campaign whether they support him or not, which is immoral.

Trying to justify your BigCorp buddies pouring truckloads of money into all the Libertarian and GOP candidates :lol

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 06:50 PM
Trying to justify your BigCorp buddies pouring truckloads of money into all the Libertarian and GOP candidates :lol
Trying to justify Bernie's desire to force actually sane people to subsidize his campaign, since he's not out-fundraising Shillary :lol

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 06:52 PM
Trying to justify him wanting to force actually sane people to subsidize his campaign since he's not out-fundraising Shillary :lol

Shillary is a friend of BigCorp, so should naturally be your friend.

Why do you hate her? You're not too dissimilar in viewpoints.

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 06:53 PM
Shillary is a friend of BigCorp, so should naturally be your friend.

Why do you hate her? You're not too dissimilar in viewpoints.
Shillary is far from a libertarian. She's a shrill big-government hag and a warmonger, not to mention unethical. Amazingly, Bernie is even worse.

DarrinS
08-04-2015, 06:54 PM
The Dems would do well to nominate Sanders and differentiate themselves from the image of the angry white guy, oh wait...:lmao

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 06:55 PM
Shillary is far from a libertarian. She's a shrill big-government hag and a warmonger, not to mention unethical. Amazingly, Bernie is even worse.

Hillary and big government do not compute. She'd expand privatisation, give more power to corporations and large business and would probably pinch social security for all it's worth.

Shillary should go ahead and oust herself as a Libertarian already.

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 07:28 PM
Shillary is far from a libertarian. She's a shrill big-government hag and a warmonger, not to mention unethical. Amazingly, Bernie is even worse.
:lol Godord thinks he a libertarian

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 07:29 PM
:lol Godord thinks he a libertarian
:lol Slurper thinks she's a legal expert because she skimmed a thread on ST.

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 07:33 PM
:lol Slurper thinks she's a legal expert because she skimmed a thread on ST.
Which one was more libertarian Godord or Xeer?

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 07:39 PM
Which one was more libertarian Godord or Xeer?
Who's more of an expert on rape shield laws: a practicing lawyer, a Cl:lolv:loll:lolnd St:lolte law clerk with a participation ribbon, or a libcuck who skimmed an ST thread?

Splits
08-04-2015, 07:41 PM
563707982337568768

:lol fantastic trolling

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 07:45 PM
Who's more of an expert on rape shield laws: a practicing lawyer, a Cl:lolv:loll:lolnd St:lolte law clerk with a participation ribbon, or a libcuck who skimmed an ST thread?
Neither you, nor your pussy boyfriend would answer my question. Let's try again since this is a shitbag tread anyway. Might as well derail it...

If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 07:53 PM
Neither you, nor your pussy boyfriend would answer my question. Let's try again since this is a shitbag tread anyway. Might as well derail it...

If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I claim to be.

:lol Th'Slurper
:lol "This is a shitbag thread anyway"
:lol It's a million times better than your whiny non-contributions to the board
:lol Cleveland State
:lol "Joe Rogan triggers me :cry"

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 07:58 PM
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I claim to be.
You're not an economist either, but that doesn't prevent you from pretending like you know what the fuck you're talking about when it comes to economics. Answer the question you fake libertarian pussy.

Or better yet, ask your internet lawyer boyfriend to stop rimming you for a few minutes and let him answer.

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 07:59 PM
You're not an economist either, but that doesn't prevent you from pretending like you know what the fuck you're talking about. Answer the question you fake libertarian pussy.

Or better yet, ask your internet lawyer boyfriend to stop rimming you for a few minutes and let him answer.
^ SJW faggot ^

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 08:02 PM
^ SJW faggot ^
This is what surrender looks like.

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 08:04 PM
This is what surrender looks like.
Nah, surrender is going on for pages posting :cry "lol Joe Rogan" :cry because dissenting opinions trigger you too much to even watch a YouTube video.

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 08:07 PM
Nah, surrender is going on for pages posting :cry "lol Joe Rogan" :cry because dissenting opinions trigger you too much to even watch a YouTube video.
I don't take issue with dissenting opinions. I just don't find value in Joe Rogan's social commentary. Sorry.

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 08:09 PM
I don't take issue with dissenting opinions. I just don't find value in Joe Rogan's social commentary. Sorry.
And I don't take value in yours. Sorry.

DarrinS
08-04-2015, 08:10 PM
563707982337568768

:lol fantastic trolling


Because conservatives think millionaires should pay less taxes than bus drivers :rolleyes

nice try tho

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 08:11 PM
And I don't take value in yours. Sorry.
:cry

TeyshaBlue
08-04-2015, 08:38 PM
Bernie's still correct.

Th'Pusher
08-04-2015, 10:10 PM
Bernie's still correct.
Agreed.

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 10:48 PM
Y'all just mad that Sanders is the only politician willing to bring up and talk about policies based around social justice, rather than economy this and businesses that. We've all become so accustomed to capitalism having it's way that to even bring up talk about poverty reduction and equality is seen as taboo and should take a backseat to discussions over how much bacon Ted Cruz can cook with his assault weapon.

DarrinS
08-04-2015, 10:56 PM
Y'all just mad that Sanders is the only politician willing to bring up and talk about policies based around social justice, rather than economy this and businesses that. We've all become so accustomed to capitalism having it's way that to even bring up talk about poverty reduction and equality is seen as taboo and should take a backseat to discussions over how much bacon Ted Cruz can cook with his assault weapon.


http://theweek.com/articles/569226/bernie-sanders-actually-conservative-democratic-party

DarrinS
08-04-2015, 11:00 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/04/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-race/

Spurminator
08-04-2015, 11:01 PM
GFY

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 11:05 PM
Y'all just mad that Sanders is the only politician willing to bring up and talk about policies based around social justice, rather than economy this and businesses that. We've all become so accustomed to capitalism having it's way that to even bring up talk about poverty reduction and equality is seen as taboo and should take a backseat to discussions over how much bacon Ted Cruz can cook with his assault weapon.

Care to explain why Bernie is so firmly in bed with Lockheed Martin and other military contractors?

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/30/the-myth-of-bernie-sanders/

Spurminator
08-04-2015, 11:14 PM
Care to explain why Bernie is so firmly in bed with Lockheed Martin and other military contractors?

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/30/the-myth-of-bernie-sanders/

I dunno, must be because of all of the artillery he's going to need to steal our money for his election campaigns...

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 11:16 PM
I dunno, must be because of all of the artillery he's going to need to steal our money for his election campaigns...

AT GUNPOINT TOO, REMEMBER. Actually I think he's banging on my door right now with what sounds like the end of an M40 Rifle.

TheSanityAnnex
08-04-2015, 11:22 PM
AT GUNPOINT TOO, REMEMBER. Actually I think he's banging on my door right now with what sounds like the end of an M40 Rifle.
Bernie why did you bring a bolt action?

Spurminator
08-04-2015, 11:25 PM
It could happen! He is LITERALLY GOING TO FORCE US AT GUNPOINT to fund his campaign.

We'll be like, "But Mr. Sanders, I don't plan to vote for you!" And he'll be like, "Tough shit, Nancy, either fork over some cash for my yard signs or suck on the end of my Kalashnikov."

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 11:29 PM
Bernie why did you bring a bolt action?

I knew you wouldn't be able to ignore me for long, I'm just so damn irresistible.

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 11:30 PM
It could happen! He is LITERALLY GOING TO FORCE US AT GUNPOINT to fund his campaign.

We'll be like, "But Mr. Sanders, I don't plan to vote for you!" And he'll be like, "Tough shit, Nancy, either fork over some cash for my yard signs or suck on the end of my Kalashnikov."

:lol

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 11:32 PM
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.

Blizzardwizard
08-04-2015, 11:34 PM
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.

You flip flop more than DeAndre Jordan over abortion, Paulsucker.

Spurminator
08-04-2015, 11:35 PM
I am the Great Boutons, GFY, Repubsuckers. America is fucked and unfuckable.

Clipper Nation
08-04-2015, 11:35 PM
You flip flop more than DeAndre Jordan over abortion, Paulsucker.

Your boy's a warmonger. No different than Bush, tbh.

Splits
08-05-2015, 02:26 AM
Care to explain why Bernie is so firmly in bed with Lockheed Martin and other military contractors?


http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/09/30/the-myth-of-bernie-sanders/

I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.

:cry gold standard :cry

The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao

Fucking losers. All 10s of them.

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 08:13 AM
I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.

:cry gold standard :cry

The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao

Fucking losers. All 10s of them.

:lol

But to be fair, Sanders is socialist in many ways, certainly not revolutionary but in terms of sweeping social policies to create wealth equality and the reformation of capitalism he comes pretty close to what most would consider a modern day socialist.

Clipper Nation
08-05-2015, 08:23 AM
I love me some Counterpunch, but really? Now I've seen it all. This is why no libercucktardarian has ever received more than 1% of the vote, much less come close to holding national office without disguising themselves as a racist Republican. At least Old Man Bernie got elected like 8 times as a self-acclaimed "socialist" (although he's nothing close to an actual socialist). Voters hate the CNs of this world, because they stand for nothing and everything at the same time. They have absolutely no morals. Whatever fits your agenda at that given moment, seize on it and pretend it is truth. One moment they are citing Counterpunch, the next they're pretending the Daily Caller and National Review are dropping truth bombs. It's the most idiotic, incoherent, and inconsistent "political movement" on the planet. Libercucktards are the stupidest people, and they cry in their pillow each night wondering why they've never gotten more that 1% of a vote. Ever.

:cry gold standard :cry

The CN's of the world are the least-potent, most meaningless voting block in the country yet think they are somehow influential or important :lmao

Fucking losers. All 10s of them.
Translation: you have no explanation for why Bernie Sanders is a chickenhawk, but you are butthurt that I linked to a site you normally agree with.

:cry "You have absolutely no morals. You should support Bernie whoring his state out to the war lobby in order to help make more drone strikes and oil wars possible." :cry

:cry "You stand for absolutely nothing. You should be principled like me. I hate our foreign policy except for when Bernie's supporting it, then it's fine." :cry

:cry "Reading a wide array of news sites is idiotic and incoherent. You should stick only to the partisan echo chambers that tell you what you want to hear." :cry

:lmao Splitcuck

boutons_deux
08-05-2015, 08:38 AM
Bernie and his history aren't perfect, but he's 1000% better than Hillary and the ridiculous Repug Billionaire's Klown Kar.

vy65
08-05-2015, 09:18 AM
Neither you, nor your pussy boyfriend would answer my question. Let's try again since this is a shitbag tread anyway. Might as well derail it...

If a judge deems evidence inadmissible citing rape shield law, does the defense have any avenues to challenge the decision with relevant case law to cite as precedent?

This is exactly why non-lawyers need to shut the fuck up when it comes to shit like this. Reading posts on a web forum and skimming an article from an idiot **** law student (who doesn't even practice in this area, btw) really sheds no light on the topic.

The only way to answer this question is to do a 50 state survey of each state's rape shield laws, rules of evidence, and cases construing both the laws and the rules. That is incredibly time consuming. Like weeks worth of research to be done properly.

Moreover, the fact that there is precedent to challenge a judge's exclusion of evidence only means that there's grounds for a challenge -- it doesn't mean it'll be successful.

But really, the key reason why this is so fucking retarded is that once the evidence is excluded and/or a guilty verdict reached, the damage is already done. Appellate rules create strong presumptions towards upholding jury verdicts. Meaning that even if there is a legitimate challenge, it is both possible and plausible that the challenge will be rejected regardless.

But hey slurper, you read some shit on the internet once from some **** who went to a law school that used to be a YMCA, so I guess that makes you an expert on things.

vy65
08-05-2015, 09:19 AM
The only way to answer this question is to do a 50 state survey of each state's rape shield laws, rules of evidence, and cases construing both the laws and the rules. That is incredibly time consuming. Like weeks worth of research to be done properly.


Since slurper is so obsessed with this point, that little fagget needs to do this work or shut his pussy ass mouth the fuck up.

Winehole23
08-05-2015, 09:24 AM
thanks for admitting it would take weeks of research to back up your bs.

lol blaming other posters for not doing your own homework.

vy65
08-05-2015, 09:26 AM
thanks for admitting it would take weeks of research to back up your bs.

lol blaming other posters for not doing your own homework.


In some cases they do. Do you deny that?

Do you have a link to me saying all rape shield laws exclude the same evidence in all jurisdictions?

Again, what evidence do you have that my "thinly supported" opinion is overstated. You've been grasping at straws for a while now.

boutons_deux
08-05-2015, 09:42 AM
:lol Berniesuckers deflecting from some more uncomfortable truths, I see. You guys are the Enrique stans of the Political Forum.

not at all. Here's some VERY mixed support:

Bernie and the Sandernistas: Into the Void

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/bernie_and_the_sandernistas_into_the_void_20150803 ?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+Truthdig+Truthdig%253A+Dril ling+Beneath+the+Headlines

Winehole23
08-05-2015, 11:17 AM
we're at a weird political inflection point: the importance of national party committees has been eclipsed by SuperPACS, which are taking over campaigning and messaging for the candidates.

Winehole23
08-05-2015, 11:19 AM
for two national cycles in a row, billionaire backers have propelled unviable candidates and prolonged the GOP circular firing squad in the primaries.

spurraider21
08-05-2015, 11:20 AM
Bernie really is stupid. Someone voluntarily giving money to a campaign is not "legalized bribery." He, on the other hand, wants the taxpayer to be forced by the state to subsidize his campaign whether they support him or not, which is immoral.
how is it not? we'll give you x millions of dollars if you do a, b, and c

Winehole23
08-05-2015, 11:27 AM
some posters back hard spending caps and public funding for national elections to prevent arrogant billionaires and special interests from suborning the political process; other posters seem to think that's just as it should be...whoever has the most gold picks our candidates.

Wild Cobra
08-05-2015, 11:46 AM
Just out of curiosity, what does he expect to do when he runs out of other people's money to spend during his theoretical presidency?

http://commondreams.org/news/2015/08/03/topple-us-oligarchy-sanders-calls-publicly-financed-elections

Well...

You post something from Common Dreams, and expect any intelligent person to click on it?

Wild Cobra
08-05-2015, 11:49 AM
What does his theoretical presidency have to do with public campaign finance vs corporations owning your politicians?
He's reading from Common Dreams.

He has no intelligent answer.

Wild Cobra
08-05-2015, 12:00 PM
Now that I said my piece, I will admit that I like Bernie sanders more than most the other members of congress. Even though he is a socialist by name, be believes in the country, and it's people more than most the blowhards in congress.

If he wins the primaries, I could see myself voting for him over a RINO.

Why?

Because he is real. Plus, he is less of a socialist than most other members of congress.

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 12:20 PM
Moreover, the fact that there is precedent to challenge a judge's exclusion of evidence only means that there's grounds for a challenge -- it doesn't mean it'll be successful.

But really, the key reason why this is so fucking retarded is that once the evidence is excluded and/or a guilty verdict reached, the damage is already done. Appellate rules create strong presumptions towards upholding jury verdicts. Meaning that even if there is a legitimate challenge, it is both possible and plausible that the challenge will be rejected regardless.

But hey slurper, you read some shit on the internet once from some **** who went to a law school that used to be a YMCA, so I guess that makes you an expert on things.

:lol @ this fuming hyper-emotional response.

First off, the article fuzzy posted from the law clerk played no role in the genesis of my very basic question. I specifically said it was the reference ElNono linked. I do not know why you and your fake libertarian boyfriend keep referring to Fuzzys link other than to obfuscate the issue.

The quip I quoted above would have been a perfectly legitimate response to my question as there is an avenue for appeal with relevant case law as precedent.

Just calm down a take a breath before you post Maynard Manson. You're a very emotional man.

TheSanityAnnex
08-05-2015, 01:11 PM
I knew you wouldn't be able to ignore me for long, I'm just so damn irresistible.

You were never on ignore you stupid fuck.

vy65
08-05-2015, 01:46 PM
:lol slurper chasing me in other threads crying about :cry you didn't answer my question :cry and when I finally do, I'm "emotional."

Word to the wise buddy, having nothing substantive to say and trying to deflect how asshurt you are onto the posters who respond to you is what little ignorant faggets do.

Blake
08-05-2015, 01:54 PM
for two national cycles in a row, billionaire backers have propelled unviable candidates and prolonged the GOP circular firing squad in the primaries.

Yeah, seriously why bother voting?

Blake
08-05-2015, 01:55 PM
thanks for admitting it would take weeks of research to back up your bs.


:lol

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 06:33 PM
:lol slurper chasing me in other threads crying about :cry you didn't answer my question :cry and when I finally do, I'm "emotional."

Word to the wise buddy, having nothing substantive to say and trying to deflect how asshurt you are onto the posters who respond to you is what little ignorant faggets do.

It was your fake libertarian boyfriend that resurrected the topic and dragged your name into the fray. Next time Keep your little bitch on a leash.

vy65
08-05-2015, 06:45 PM
^ hyper-emotional pussy

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 06:58 PM
^projecting

vy65
08-05-2015, 07:01 PM
^projecting

:lol this fuming hyper-emotional response.

First off, the article fuzzy posted from the law clerk played no role in the genesis of my very basic question. I specifically said it was the reference ElNono linked. I do not know why you and your fake libertarian boyfriend keep referring to Fuzzys link other than to obfuscate the issue.

The quip I quoted above would have been a perfectly legitimate response to my question as there is an avenue for appeal with relevant case law as precedent.

Just calm down a take a breath before you post Maynard Manson. You're a very emotional man.

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 07:03 PM
You're boing. Just keep your bitch on a leash next time, got it?

vy65
08-05-2015, 07:09 PM
You're boing. Just keep your bitch on a leash next time, got it?

Only a fucking fagget like you would say this kind of inanity.

thunder
08-05-2015, 07:11 PM
Only a fucking fagget like you would say this kind of inanity.
Just say faggot like this

You're boing. Just keep your bitch on a leash next time, got it?
faggot

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 07:12 PM
You were never on ignore you stupid fuck.

Um...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251533&p=8151152#post8151152



Blizzardwizard
Spurs fan in England
This message is hidden because Blizzardwizard is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

Seems like you need your pills old man, you're forgetting things. 'You stupid fuck'.

FuzzyLumpkins
08-05-2015, 07:14 PM
Only a fucking fagget like you would say this kind of inanity.

Yeah like pretending you have a law degree and passed the bar.

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 07:19 PM
Just say faggot like this

faggot


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R890wISHwG4

Clipper Nation
08-05-2015, 07:21 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R890wISHwG4
Wow, Tool wrote a song about you?

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 07:24 PM
Wow, Tool wrote a song about you?
Here's one about you and vy.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F97RgIz_fTE

TheSanityAnnex
08-05-2015, 08:17 PM
Um...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251533&p=8151152#post8151152




Seems like you need your pills old man, you're forgetting things. 'You stupid fuck'.



Watch this

Blizzardwizard
Spurs fan in England
This message is hidden because Blizzardwizard is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

or this

Faggotwizard
Spurs faggot in England
This message is hidden because Faggotwizard is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list



you really are a stupid fuck.

thunder
08-05-2015, 08:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R890wISHwG4
Why are you so emotional? On another note, how the fuck do you wake up with that sick demented liberal mindset. Do you know that you're an example of human de-evolution?

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 08:33 PM
Watch this

Blizzardwizard
Spurs fan in England
This message is hidden because Blizzardwizard is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

or this

Faggotwizard
Spurs faggot in England
This message is hidden because Faggotwizard is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list



you really are a stupid fuck.


'Faggotwizard' :lol

Oh old man, you make me laugh sometimes.

boutons_deux
08-05-2015, 08:34 PM
https://berniesanders.com/issues/

why are you rigthwingnutters against each and every one of Bernie's issues?

TheSanityAnnex
08-05-2015, 08:35 PM
'Faggotwizard' :lol

Oh old man, you make me laugh sometimes.

Likewise with your stupidity.

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 08:36 PM
Why are you so emotional? On another note, how the fuck do you wake up with that sick demented liberal mindset. Do you know that you're an example of human de-evolution?
You don't know the definition of emotional and you're clearly not an intelligent man.

TheSanityAnnex
08-05-2015, 08:39 PM
Um...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=251533&p=8151152#post8151152




Seems like you need your pills old man, you're forgetting things. 'You stupid fuck'.
I would never put someone on ignore, what would be the purpose of conversing on a message board if you don't have the will power or control to skip over or not respond to someone's post. The only people who use the ignore function are faggots who get their feels hurt by opinions that don't line up with their own. I only know of one person that is that big of a hurt feely faggot.

thunder
08-05-2015, 08:39 PM
You don't know the definition of emotional and you're clearly not an intelligent man.
You literally post like you're ovulating. Did the gubamint not come in clutch with those tampons?

Clipper Nation
08-05-2015, 08:43 PM
You literally post like you're ovulating. Did the gubamint not come in clutch with those tampons?

:lmao

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 08:51 PM
I would never put someone on ignore, what would be the purpose of conversing on a message board if you don't have the will power or control to skip over or not respond to someone's post. The only people who use the ignore function are faggots who get their feels hurt by opinions that don't line up with their own. I only know of one person that is that big of a hurt feely faggot.

Well you certainly don't seem to have the control to skip over my posts. Maybe you enjoy them so much you feel compelled to respond?

Th'Pusher
08-05-2015, 08:53 PM
You literally post like you're ovulating. Did the gubamint not come in clutch with those tampons?


:lmao
Circe jerk. Yay!

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 08:58 PM
Circe jerk. Yay!

The Conservacucks enjoy a circle jerk from time to time, ever thought where the sperm that created Rand Paul and Ted Cruz came from?

thunder
08-05-2015, 09:02 PM
Blizzardwizard

Murica 2
UK 0

TheSanityAnnex
08-05-2015, 09:20 PM
Well you certainly don't seem to have the control to skip over my posts. Maybe you enjoy them so much you feel compelled to respond?
I do enjoy your stupid takes, always entertaining.

Blizzardwizard
08-05-2015, 09:20 PM
I do enjoy your stupid takes, always entertaining.

Likewise I enjoy yours, old man.

Splits
08-05-2015, 11:59 PM
Th'Pusher going IN with Tool references. My new favorite poster. Hadn't listened to hooker w/ a penis in a couple years, brings back good memories. Too bad Maynard never played it live

Splits
08-06-2015, 01:14 AM
Th'Pusher not sure if you've seen this one of these kids covering one of Tool's most difficult songs. If not, enjoy :toast

mYKLvYGqaC0

boutons_deux
08-06-2015, 06:12 AM
we're at a weird political inflection point: the importance of national party committees has been eclipsed by SuperPACS, which are taking over campaigning and messaging for the candidates.

at?

that point was passed 2012, as direct result of politicized SCOTUS5 and C-U a couple year earlier. btw, the decision that bothers Notorious RBG the most is C-U.

and the insane extremists aren't done, yet:

Mitch McConnell Aims To Roll Back Campaign Finance Laws (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/01/mitch-mcconnell-campaign-finance_n_6251380.html)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/mitch-mcconnell-campaign-finance/

Th'Pusher
08-06-2015, 06:13 AM
Th'Pusher (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19189) not sure if you've seen this one of these kids covering one of Tool's most difficult songs. If not, enjoy :toast

mYKLvYGqaC0
:tu happy to watch this 7:00 video. As long as it's not Joe Rogan whining about fringe feminists :lol