So much for the concept of free exchange of ideas...

[Phenomanul]

Just goes to show the insecurities of the folks on this board…

I will no longer be posting in the Political Forum as of this post.

“Someone” sent an email to my employer to try to get me fired “for blogging on company time”. :lmao :lmao :lmao

Unfortunately for them… I didn’t even have to dismiss the allegations – simply because I manage to produce deliverables at an efficiently high level – and don’t really need to defend the use of my time to validate my work output. That said, if folks here could stoop to that level of maliciousness, simply because they disagree with my views, because they ‘hate’ that I wear Christianity on my sleeve and defend my right to believe as I wish, to vote as I wish – that's a reflection of their intolerance. But when they end the email with the phrase "I know where he lives," - well, I consider that borderline threatening behavior.

I am now forced to confine my participation in Spurstalk relegated strictly to the Spurs forum and will likely have to create a new account to that end. I will not expose my family or my children to threats from bitter, mentally unstable folks in this forum.

To everyone else: Thanks for the enlightening debates. Despite my self-acknowledged stubbornness, I will admit that I learned much from many of the posters on this forum (I actually miss engages with Extra Stout, FWD, etc...).

I offer my heartfelt apology if I offended anyone. "Agreeing to disagree without being disagreeable" is a difficult thing to do with the passionate, controversial, or deeply rooted subjects that are routinely discussed in this particular sub-forum.

Peace.

[Blake]

That sucks someone did that but the short lesson is don't post about how you're spending too much time posting here while at work.

Especially if you're gonna wear your Christianity on your sleeve.....stealing from your employer like that is unseemly.

[DarrinS]

“Someone” sent an email to my employer to try to get me fired “for blogging on company time”. :lmao :lmao :lmao




Wow. That's bullshit. Probably FuzzyLumpkins. What an asshole!

[baseline bum]

That's pretty chickenshit.

[ElNono]

That's pretty chickenshit.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Wow. That's bullshit. Probably FuzzyLumpkins. What an asshole!
My first thought as well. That faggot has done this before. Piece of shit.

[mingus]

I'd respond but who knows I might be next on the hit list. Going forward, I just can't post here anymore either because of that. It's not worth the risk.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow. That's bullshit. Probably FuzzyLumpkins. What an asshole!

:lol yeah it was me that was responsible for his martyrdom. . . .

He left right after I linked the Roman law he was claiming did not exist.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lol yeah it was me that was responsible for his martyrdom. . . .

He left right after I linked the Roman law he was claiming did not exist.
Faggot snitch repeat offender.

[CosmicCowboy]

Typical fuzzy. Classic butt hurt internet warrior.

[CosmicCowboy]

I sure hope the faggot tries to report me to my boss.

[Nbadan]

No proof....no name of said rat....

....you got to come better than that...

[Th'Pusher]

:lol yeah it was me that was responsible for his martyrdom. . . .

He left right after I linked the Roman law he was claiming did not exist.

What were you trying to accomplish by reaching out to his employer? What the fuck do you care if he reads/posts on ST at work?

Also, how'd you know who to contact?

[Winehole23]

if true, how pathetic.

[HI-FI]

That's pretty chickenshit.
This.

OP you seem like a good person, even if you weren't, you don't deserve that shit. That's fucked up.

[ChumpDumper]

There is no possibility someone at work doesn't like you?

Occam's razor.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What were you trying to accomplish by reaching out to his employer? What the fuck do you care if he reads/posts on ST at work?

Also, how'd you know who to contact?

no font for sarcasm. this goes with the Hob@rt suicide.

I have no idea what his email or employer is. How would I know?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

if true, how pathetic.

:lol this fucking place. I don't know if any of this is directed at me but I feel the need to defend myself.

As far as I knew, this account claimed to work at an oil rig. The account also claimed in the course of our dispute to have a physics degree when I brought up Euler's topology.

The OP came about 15 minutes after THIS POST (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=255542&page=24&p=8395583&viewfull=1#post8395583).

That is all I did leading up to his meltdown.

[Nbadan]

Well...hate to see anyone go...but Phenomanul hasn't really provided any proof that anyone sent anything to anyone....and people flame out all the time...

[ChumpDumper]

No one here would ever say someone is "blogging."

[Wild Cobra]

I sure hope the faggot tries to report me to my boss.
LOL...

He's just laugh in their face I bet.

[Wild Cobra]

There is no possibility someone at work doesn't like you?

Occam's razor.

Actually, I agree this is more likely. Someone saw at work what he was doing that doesn't like him. I'm posting now from work. However, I am on my personal laptop and my T-mobile hotspot, and on break.

I don't care how innocent it is, people should never use work computers for activities like this, unless work sanctioned.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow. That's bullshit. Probably FuzzyLumpkins. What an asshole!


Typical fuzzy. Classic butt hurt internet warrior.

:lol You do get the irony here, fattie?

[RandomGuy]

Just goes to show the insecurities of the folks on this board…

I will no longer be posting in the Political Forum as of this post.

“Someone” sent an email to my employer to try to get me fired “for blogging on company time”. :lmao :lmao :lmao

Unfortunately for them… I didn’t even have to dismiss the allegations – simply because I manage to produce deliverables at an efficiently high level – and don’t really need to defend the use of my time to validate my work output. That said, if folks here could stoop to that level of maliciousness, simply because they disagree with my views, because they ‘hate’ that I wear Christianity on my sleeve and defend my right to believe as I wish, to vote as I wish – that's a reflection of their intolerance. But when they end the email with the phrase "I know where he lives," - well, I consider that borderline threatening behavior.

I am now forced to confine my participation in Spurstalk relegated strictly to the Spurs forum and will likely have to create a new account to that end. I will not expose my family or my children to threats from bitter, mentally unstable folks in this forum.

To everyone else: Thanks for the enlightening debates. Despite my self-acknowledged stubbornness, I will admit that I learned much from many of the posters on this forum (I actually miss engages with Extra Stout, FWD, etc...).

I offer my heartfelt apology if I offended anyone. "Agreeing to disagree without being disagreeable" is a difficult thing to do with the passionate, controversial, or deeply rooted subjects that are routinely discussed in this particular sub-forum.

Peace.

Sorry to hear that.

[RandomGuy]

There is no possibility someone at work doesn't like you?

Occam's razor.

That is a good point. No one here would use the phrase "blogging" to describe this, IMO.

Someone who didn't know what Spurstalk is, and just saw it passing by, though, might. Someone who resents a high-productivity co-worker and sees the chance to bring them down a peg or remove the competition, would have a great deal of motivation to send such an email, as well as easy access to the email address of Phenomanul's boss.

[Blake]

Just goes to show the insecurities of the folks on this board…

I will no longer be posting in the Political Forum as of this post.

I am now forced to confine my participation in Spurstalk relegated strictly to the Spurs forum and will likely have to create a new account to that end.

Peace.

So to clear, the email said they wanted you fired unless your participation is strictly relegated to the Spurs forum.

Or was that your boss that told you that

[DisAsTerBot]

yeah no one here calls this blogging. Or knows where you work. Or knows your boss's email address. Or knows where you live.

it's probably someone you work with

[Spurminator]

Sorry about the work situation, but (no offense), even if someone here really was going to go to the lengths of reaching out to an employer of someone they disagree with, there are about 50 other posters here who would be bigger targets of that kind of snitchery.

[baseline bum]

yeah no one here calls this blogging. Or knows where you work. Or knows your boss's email address. Or knows where you live.

it's probably someone you work with

Yeah, that makes more sense. I don't know how anyone here would find Phenom's workplace or boss.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I'm still going with the known and proven snitch theory.

[DisAsTerBot]

I'm still going with the known and proven snitch theory.

when someone's selling a conspiracy, we know you're buying!

[TheSanityAnnex]

when someone's selling a conspiracy, we know you're buying!

FuzzyLumpkins is a known snitch, even made a thread bragging about his snitch ways.

[DisAsTerBot]

FuzzyLumpkins is a known snitch, even made a thread bragging about his snitch ways.

i know, you're sold.

[Blake]

when someone's selling a conspiracy, we know you're buying!

Lol

[Blake]

I'm still going with the known and proven snitch theory.

Islamic fundamentalist emailed phenomenal's boss imo

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Maybe I should start a god thread in the Spurs forum so he can still talk about it then. Hate for him to have to stop putting his 'faith on his sleave.'

[tlongII]

That's very unfortunate that happened to Phenom. I enjoyed reading his posts even though I didn't agree with them.

[Bender]

LOL...

He's just laugh in their face I bet.

CC is his own boss...

[SnakeBoy]

No one here would ever say someone is "blogging."

IDK, Fuzzy is constantly using the word "blog".

[FuzzyLumpkins]

IDK, Fuzzy is constantly using the word "blog".

Not as much as you.

[TheSanityAnnex]

What was the thread where he snitched on cosmored and bragged about it?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

The whole snitch diatribe is so for peons and the disenfranchised. I don't subscribe to it.

I didn't turn anyone in but if certain lines are crossed people are smart to appeal to authority and wiser still to mistrust those that peddle that snitch nonsense. its creeper shit.

As I pointed out before to the m>s account, the federal extremist task force was reimplemented in 2014 and he's on here calling for a race war days before a shooting. I don't need to snitch anything as you will darwin yourselves.

[TheSanityAnnex]

The whole snitch diatribe is so for peons and the disenfranchised. I don't subscribe to it.

I didn't turn anyone in but if certain lines are crossed people are smart to appeal to authority and wiser still to mistrust those that peddle that snitch nonsense. its creeper shit.

As I pointed out before to the m>s account, the federal extremist task force was reimplemented in 2014 and he's on here calling for a race war days before a shooting. I don't need to snitch anything as you will darwin yourselves.
Never said you snitched on m>s but interesting you felt the need to bring that up. I was talking about the bitch move you pulled on cosmored and then later bragged about here.

[DarrinS]

Lol

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197878&p=5910380&viewfull=1#post5910380

[SnakeBoy]

Lol

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197878&p=5910380&viewfull=1#post5910380

:lol

What a bitch

[TheSanityAnnex]

The whole snitch diatribe is so for peons and the disenfranchised. I don't subscribe to it.

I didn't turn anyone in but if certain lines are crossed people are smart to appeal to authority and wiser still to mistrust those that peddle that snitch nonsense. its creeper shit.

As I pointed out before to the m>s account, the federal extremist task force was reimplemented in 2014 and he's on here calling for a race war days before a shooting. I don't need to snitch anything as you will darwin yourselves.
Thanks Darrin forgot it was poptech and not cosmored.

Doesn't get anymore bitchmade than this. So fucking pathetic.

"Below is what I emailed.

Dear Site Administrator or Similar Associate,


I am a poster on a sports website, spurstalk.com. It's a very diverse site and includes one of the most nefarious locales on the internet: a lightly moderated political forum. I post as under the username FuzzyLumpkins.


On said forum, there is a thread entitled Why I think Climate Change Denial is Little More than Pseudoscience. It's original thread went up to 4002 posts and has recently started its second iteration. the previous incarnation can be found HERE and its current form will most certainly be on the front page. For most of you, this will have an obvious link and for the rest it will become more clear shortly.


To cut to the chase, about a month and a half ago a member of the forum posted a link to the <large number>+ Skeptical Science Papers from a site many of you are probably familiar with: populartechnology.net. I did a bit of research and found blogs and the like about the contents regarding the relatively small collaborative scientists who wrote the papers, contradictions within the works, umbrage from included scientists, etc. I am sure most if not all of you are familiar with the list. It seems like its been getting a lot of play lately. I made a post about it.


I think you can guess what happened next: Poptech shows up. He began posting his litany of rehearsed answers and began his megalomaniac claims of being irrefutable. Anyone who disagreed with him were liars and he has now gone to the point recently of claiming that skeptics that disagree with him are drug addicts mostly because I have said that I smoke pot and I know how to push his buttons. More on that in a second.


Anyway I quickly tired of having him rehash his canned answers and decided to go a different tact. Anyone that has dealt with him or had any discourse with him quickly realizes that he is not 100% right upstairs. He is singularly obsessive and completely inflexible and puritanical about anything that deviates from his worldview. Anything that he deems socialist precludes something as being capitalist. Any link justifies conflation and is absolute. His views on your stereotypical US 'right' agenda are absolute. His forums are really his database for his political views and canned answers. You can read as his sophistry is cataloged and evolves. If you go there and read them they are the stereotypical rightist views. Stuff like drugs are bad, alcohol is good, AGW is false, unions are bad, laissez faire is the way to go, flat tax is good, socialized medicine is bad, etc. Any deviation from that is irrefutably wrong. From what I understand he goes across the interwebs to spread his gospel.


I began to get him to go through his canned responses. It started off with me trying to figure out his method but quickly became me trying to get his obsessiveness rolling. I was going to see what I could get him to do. I worked out his puritanical approach to economics but then I came upon the 'Truth' series on his site. Most of you are probably familiar with it because with each of you he considers his political enemies he has one on you. He labels people as communists, terrorists, criminals, or posts pictures of your homes and tries to demean your professions. It's really scummy stuff. So, I decided to have him go through that. Some of the lengths that he went through to dig up stuff on you guys is pretty alarming. Pun intended.


At the end after arguing with him for quite some time, I conceded a point. Sorry greenfyre, it had to do with you indeed being associated with those he labeled as terrorists. Its asinine, I know. Why this was important will be clear in a moment. The next day I log on to find that he had started a thread which boiled down to Laissez Faire is great. It consisted of a bunch of youtube advertisements from the Heritage Foundation, Koch Brothers, and the Cato Institute. After discussing the particular industries that the board members of the Heritage Foundation worked for I decided to see what we could get him to do. I had his obsession rolling and I had given him the narcissistic feedback he needed to feel comfortable. I put a checklist about a particular Axis 2 mental disorder in front of him. The link for it is from the NIH and can be found HERE. He criticized my first posting which I conceded by correcting, put it back in front of him and lo and behold he filled it out. Below is what he wrote.


****************************


Take advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals Fail - I have not taken advantage of anyone. That is just absurd.


Have excessive feelings of self-importance Fail - I have no such feelings


Exaggerate achievements and talents Fail - I have exaggerated nothing


Be preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love Fail - on all counts, I am already successful, I do not seek "power", I am not vain, I have no fantasies about my intelligence, I am in a fullfilling relationship with a beautiful women


Have unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment True - You got me there, I do not expect to be dishonestly lied about and now smeared as you and RG have done.


Need constant attention and admiration Fail - Absolute fail, You have no idea how I do not care for attention or admiration.


Disregard the feelings of others, and have little ability to feel empathy Check - I could careless about yours or anyone else's feelings online. All I care about is what is true.


Have obsessive self-interest - Check - This is true but it has nothing to with this disorder but actually something else. I believe I have a mild form of aspergers syndrome similar to Michael Burry that allows me to relentlessly concentrate on a topic if I choose. This is actually a strength as I effectively never tire.


Pursue mainly selfish goals - Absolutely False - My whole point for doing this is I do not like liars like you and other alarmists. If you never stated any lies I would not even be here.


********************************


Now the link to his original post is HERE, but despite it being written on 5/4/2012 you can see that he edited it to ridicule me and conflate me with psychotics nearly three weeks later on 5/24/2012. I guess it took him awhile but I think he finally realized or someone he knows realized what he had written. But not to worry my response immediately following the original post where I quote what he wrote is HERE. Also there are HERE and HERE where there are other posters talk about or link his admission which as you can see none of which have been edited. If you want read the postings that lead up to and follow the linked posts and it becomes pretty clear what went on.


I will leave it to the individual to judge what they consider true or flase from what he wrote but one thing is clear: he claims he thinks he has a Axis 1 Mental Disorder. Now if you look a bit into aspergers and NPD, you will quickly find that they are often misdiagnosed for each other. A simple google search of 'aspergers narcissist misdiagnosis' will pull reams of articles and studies on the particular misdiagnosis. The main difference between sociopathic personality disorders like NPD and and autism spectrum mental disorders likeaspergers is that the latter is unaware of what his action are doing to the people he interacts with while the former is aware but just doesn't care.


I have thought about this and concluded he is probably the former. One of the things that narcissists do is devalue or dehumanize people that they consider threats or critics so they can dismiss them. Most of us have been labeled as what he considers undesirables. In my case, he has taken an admission of having smoked pot to label me as a psychotic drug addict. Others have been labeled as communists, criminals, terrorists or otherwise ridiculed so he can dismiss you out of hand. He has done this with every major AGW site on the internet. Every one. That and as you can see he says 'I could careless about yours or anyone else's feelings online.'


Now I am not above some introspection. If you read that site, it demonstrates that I can be a hothead who does not suffer fools and I wrestle with the ethic and moral implications of manipulating mentally ill people. I worry may be antisocial behavior of my own. At the same time I have tried to point out what he is susceptible to and that there are people out there that can help him. He is to the point where I am such a threat in his mind though that he just repeats the litany of how he devalues me and completely denies ever to admitting having the disorder. He is nothing if not disconcerting.


Regardless, I also think that given what he has done to you guys with his 'Truth' series, perhaps some of you will appreciate this context of this particular individual. That is my hope anyway. I also hope that somehow he can get the help that he really does need.


Finally, I would like to mention that I appreciate the empirical approach that you guys take towards your blogging and reporting and I believe you are fighting the good fight. I hope for the best in your endeavors.


Fuzzy"

[ChumpDumper]

So to whom did he send that?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So to whom did he send that?

I sent it to the people on Poptech's smear campaign list on his site. Greenfyre, skeptical science, and the like.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You guys left out the meat of the email:


React to criticism with rage, shame, or humiliation Fail - None of my reactions have been rage, shame or humiliation. This is a forum, you cannot see my physical person which remains completely calm at all times online.

Take advantage of other people to achieve his or her own goals Fail - I have not taken advantage of anyone. That is just absurd.

Have excessive feelings of self-importance Fail - I have no such feelings

Exaggerate achievements and talents Fail - I have exaggerated nothing

Be preoccupied with fantasies of success, power, beauty, intelligence, or ideal love Fail - on all counts, I am already successful, I do not seek "power", I am not vain, I have no fantasies about my intelligence, I am in a fullfilling relationship with a beautiful women

Have unreasonable expectations of favorable treatment True - You got me there, I do not expect to be dishonestly lied about and now smeared as you and RG have done.

Need constant attention and admiration Fail - Absolute fail, You have no idea how I do not care for attention or admiration.

Disregard the feelings of others, and have little ability to feel empathy Check - I could careless about yours or anyone else's feelings online. All I care about is what is true.

Have obsessive self-interest - Check - This is true but it has nothing to with this disorder but actually something else. I believe I have a mild form of aspergers syndrome similar to Michael Burry that allows me to relentlessly concentrate on a topic if I choose. This is actually a strength as I effectively never tire.

[ChumpDumper]

I sent it to the people on Poptech's smear campaign list on his site. Greenfyre, skeptical science, and the like.Oh, so that's not really like the OP situation at all.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Oh, so that's not really like the OP situation at all.

:lol it wasn't obvious?

It took him awhile to realize what path I had led him down by asking him easy questions for a day or so. I only had to feed the survey twice and that was what popped out.

I only sent the survey on in the first place because he started deleting all his posts that acknowledged he had written it and instead inserted claims I was a drug fiend because I openly admit to smoking pot. When he comes back I post that and ask him whether or not he's shown that survey to a shrink yet. He doesn't come around here anymore.

Now why the Darrin, CC, and TSA accounts would be so up in arms about that still to this day 4 years later is interesting. What do they have to be worried about?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Oh, so that's not really like the OP situation at all.

Both situations involved someone taking this site too seriously and acting like a bitch.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

TSA sure gets serious about me.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

When a debt has been acknowledged or a judgment has been pronounced in court, 30 days must be the legitimate grace period. Thereafter, arrest of the debtor may be made by the laying on of hands. Bring him into court. If he does not satisfy the judgment (or no one in court offers himself as surety on his behalf) the creditor may take the debtor with him. He may bind him either in stocks or fetters, with a weight of no less than 15 lbs. (or more if he desires)." [After 60 days in custody, the case is returned to the court, and if the debt is not then paid, the debtor can be sold abroad as a slave, or put to death.]

[clambake]

free exchange of ideas?

nothing is free motherfucker

[SnakeBoy]

I sent it to the people on Poptech's smear campaign list on his site. Greenfyre, skeptical science, and the like.


Typical fuzzy. Classic butt hurt internet warrior.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Now why the Darrin, Snakeboy, CC, and TSA accounts would be so up in arms about this still to this day, 4 years later, is interesting.

:lol Snakeboy gets serious too.

[ChumpDumper]

Both situations involved someone taking this site too seriously and acting like a bitch.Well, the email itself was over the top, for sure.

[Nbadan]

Yep....now let's see the Pheno e-mail....