PDA

View Full Version : Avery Bradley With The Game Winner In 'The Land'



Spurtacular
02-05-2016, 10:50 PM
And to think we could've had him for Kawhi!

http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/MF.OEeC3X3I7EkF8YqxPmg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3NfbGVnbztmaT1maWxsO2g9Mzc3O3B4b2ZmPT UwO3B5b2ZmPTA7cT03NTt3PTY3MA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/Sports/ap/201602052135777141041

ElNono
02-05-2016, 10:51 PM
shut the fuck up

Benoit
02-05-2016, 10:51 PM
Didnt you guys just get blown out by this Cavs team?

Spurtacular
02-05-2016, 10:53 PM
Didnt you guys just get blown out by this Cavs team?

Might've been different had we had Bradley....

Horse
02-05-2016, 11:22 PM
Didnt you guys just get blown out by this Cavs team?
Who is this faggot Johnny come lately "warriors" fan?

RD2191
02-05-2016, 11:54 PM
shut the fuck up

Chinook
02-05-2016, 11:55 PM
I'm pretty confused to as to the OP's logic here, his need to STFU aside.

DPG21920
02-05-2016, 11:58 PM
Aside, aside, pretty amazing to me the progress Bradley has made. He's become a viable offensive threat over the years. He's not some super efficient player or anything, but he is respectable enough on offense for his level of defense now.

Mel_13
02-06-2016, 12:00 AM
shut the fuck up

Ditty
02-06-2016, 12:17 AM
I wonder if the Spurs had any interest drafting Avery Bradley right before Boston took him at 19th, and we picked at 20th which we ended up taking James Anderson.

That would of been nice, but not sure if we could of afforded everyone.

Chinook
02-06-2016, 12:42 AM
I wonder if the Spurs had any interest drafting Avery Bradley right before Boston took him at 19th, and we picked at 20th which we ended up taking James Anderson.

That would of been nice, but not sure if we could of afforded everyone.

I'm sure the Spurs had interest in Bradley. They were planning on trading Hill for Paul George that year. Had the Pacers accepted that trade, the Spurs would have been looking for a PG with their natural first just like they did the next season with Joseph. Only PGs in that range were Bradley and Vasquez.

It's an open question as to whether the Spurs would have been a better team with Bradley/PG rather than Mills/Green/Leonard. Actually, I think the second group wins hands down as they would have kept Jefferson in that case (PG came into the league as a guard). But then they also would have had that 2012 first, which they could have used on Ezeli or Green. AND they would have had that 2011 first that they could have used on Butler or Parsons. Damn, it really gets complicated.

SAGirl
02-06-2016, 12:45 AM
I'm pretty confused to as to the OP's logic here, his need to STFU aside.
I thought he was just a Jimmer fan...
but he's striking me as just a flat out troll.

Maybe his Jimmermania is another effort to troll.

will_spurs
02-06-2016, 04:00 AM
Anderson vs Bradley: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=195805

Spurtacular
02-06-2016, 11:28 AM
I'm pretty confused to as to the OP's logic here, his need to STFU aside.

It's a lucid sentiment more than a case if that helps. BTW, I have no need to STFU.

Spurtacular
02-06-2016, 11:35 AM
I'm sure the Spurs had interest in Bradley. They were planning on trading Hill for Paul George that year. Had the Pacers accepted that trade, the Spurs would have been looking for a PG with their natural first just like they did the next season with Joseph. Only PGs in that range were Bradley and Vasquez.

It's an open question as to whether the Spurs would have been a better team with Bradley/PG rather than Mills/Green/Leonard. Actually, I think the second group wins hands down as they would have kept Jefferson in that case (PG came into the league as a guard). But then they also would have had that 2012 first, which they could have used on Ezeli or Green. AND they would have had that 2011 first that they could have used on Butler or Parsons. Damn, it really gets complicated.

Butler/Bradley/PG is better than Mills/Green/Leonard on paper. I don't know if the chemistry would've been there though. Butler and Bradley were shaky in some ways in the early going; and PG was allowed to play hero ball in Indy. I don't know if he would've taken his role in stride the way that Kawhi did. Mills was a 4th quarter assassin in those finals seasons; and Green was unconcious from threes. He also played great defense in the playoffs. Bradley has great defensive abilities; but he never learned how to let his foot off the gas to lull a player to sleep.

BatManu20
02-06-2016, 11:54 AM
Hook 'em. \m/

z0sa
02-06-2016, 12:04 PM
shut the fuck up

Spurtacular
02-06-2016, 12:11 PM
Anderson vs Bradley: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=195805

Nice unearthing. Spurs that close to getting Bradley. Who knows if chemistry / the domino effect still would've went our way. But that would've been a great pick for us otherwise.

sananspursfan21
02-06-2016, 02:56 PM
THAT WOULD BE SO SWEET

TheGreatYacht
05-21-2017, 10:09 PM
The man does it again. Would trade either of Aldridge, Gasol, and/or Green for him in a second.

Perfect Spur and actual 3&D player unlike washed up D League Green

Darius Bieber
05-21-2017, 10:12 PM
Just shows how trash the Spurs are. Celtics playing with way more heart.

GSH
05-21-2017, 10:48 PM
I'm sure the Spurs players would consider a trade of fans with Boston. Boston would have to throw in a few of those now-unemployed Barnum and Bailey elephants to balance the trade, because they couldn't take back more weight than they send out.

therealtruth
05-21-2017, 10:49 PM
Just shows how trash the Spurs are. Celtics playing with way more heart.

That's the one thing that annoys me about getting swept. Of course with the exception of Manu, Simmons who have heart.