Does Pop hog all the credit that Tim-Manu-Kawhi deserves?

[apalisoc_9]

Seems like hes the clear reputation beneficiary with how the media has treated these guys...great org blah blah etc.

That 03 team was 90% TD, but its now just remebred mostly as a "team" effort.

[Seventyniner]

You made a mistake there, the thread title should include Tony. I forgive you, though. People make mistakes.

[jhfenton]

Do you have to make a new thread to voice every dumb-ass, pointless, baseless question that wafts through the space in between your ears?

[ChumpDumper]

To answer OP's question: No. Credit goes where credit is due.

Also, OP is an insecure whore.

[TD 21]

Yeah, Duncan's prime has been largely forgotten by the media, who now pretend that the way the Spurs played from '12-'15 and to some extent, still do, is the way they've always played. Some also pretend he was only the go to guy for a few years and that he always played on good teams.

[EVAY]

On the off chance that the OP is a serious question, the answer is NO.

The fact that Pop is getting a lot of attention today is that he had the wit to change his team's approach to scoring as his 'superstar' aged and could no longer carry the team by himself and that said change was so successful, it not only kept the Spurs on the top of the heap with respect to annual season wins and playoff appearances as Tim aged, but it spread throughout the NBA as the method for consistently superior performance.

Pop is ALWAYS giving props to his players, most especially Timmy over the years.

If it were not for Pop's requirement that players occasionally sit out and rest and that they only return after injury when the risk of re-injury is considerably lessened, the Spurs players you mentioned would not have careers as long as they have had. The length of their careers means more awards for the players, and increases their ties to Pop. Had Pop been like most coaches, Tim would have been burned out long ago, and Manu wouldn't be able to walk by this season, much less be a major contributor on a title contending team.

Why do you try to force everything into a zero-sum game? People have been talking about Pop lately because he was the coach of the All-Star game. When they are talking about Tim, they talk about him as the best power forward of all time. Kawhi is on the cover of Sports Illustrated right now. Manu is hurt so out of the limelight right now, but no-one in the mainstream sports media ever suggests that he is anything short of a shoe-in for first ballot Hall of Fame.

So - what, exactly, is your bitch about Pop?

[ChumpDumper]

OP was 3 years old in 03.

[dabom]

Snitches everywhere today...

[ChumpDumper]

Snitches everywhere today...No engineers tho.

[dabom]

No engineers tho.

I'm guessing you are at least acknowledging your snitching culture. :lmao

[baseline bum]

Pop was a pretty average coach until 03 when he put in that motion offense instead of the 4-down every possession they ran in 02 that got them shredded by LA. That year was the first great coaching job of his career, and when he became an elite coach (though convincing Duncan to come back in 2000 was a pretty amazing move too).

[ChumpDumper]

I'm guessing you are at least acknowledging your snitching culture. :lmaoWhy would anyone need to snitch about a thread that was at the top of the forum?

Engineer an answer to that. :lmao

[HarlemHeat37]

I don't think he "hogs" the credit, but he's definitely the "representative" for the Spurs, from a media perspective(unlike virtually every other team, the player is typically the face)..Duncan is recognized as a legend and Kawhi receives a ton of praise as a top 5 player nowadays, but Pop is by far the most interesting of the Spurs, and the best sound bite for the media(Parker and Manu are great interviews, but Americans generally prefer their own kind)..

If you frequent many NBA media sources on the internet, it's evident that the majority of "new" fans believe Pop's "system" has been the key for the Spurs during this entire run..

[dabom]

Why would anyone need to snitch about a thread that was at the top of the forum?

Engineer an answer to that. :lmao

Lot of threads at the top of the forum never get locked unless a known snitch is watching...

[dabom]

I don't think he "hogs" the credit, but he's definitely the "representative" for the Spurs, from a media perspective(unlike virtually every other team, the player is typically the face)..Duncan is recognized as a legend and Kawhi receives a ton of praise as a top 5 player nowadays, but Pop is by far the most interesting of the Spurs, and the best sound bite for the media(Parker and Manu are great interviews, but Americans generally prefer their own kind)..

If you frequent many NBA media sources on the internet, it's evident that the majority of "new" fans believe Pop's "system" has been the key for the Spurs during this entire run..

Media does eat up everything Pop has to say. When People talk about the Spurs it starts from Pop to Duncan to Big three to Kawhi in that order. When in reality Kawhi is the single biggest reason we are doing this well. Star player's league.

[T_L_P]

Pop was a pretty average coach until 03 when he put in that motion offense instead of the 4-down every possession they ran in 02 that got them shredded by LA. That year was the first great coaching job of his career, and when he became an elite coach (though convincing Duncan to come back in 2000 was a pretty amazing move too).

It was still a lot of 4-Down in 03 though.

The ball moved better, but it was still a basic offense that relied almost entirely on Duncan either scoring one-on-one or kicking it out if doubled.

I agree with Harlem here. It's not like Pop goes out of his way to be SA's face (he always praises Tim/Kawhi/Manu/Tony etc).

[ChumpDumper]

Lot of threads at the top of the forum never get locked unless a known snitch is watching...Like which ones?

[dabom]

Like which ones?

Like the ones you frequent... :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Like the ones you frequent... :lolSo that means I'm not a snitch.

:lolngin:lol:lolr

[dabom]

So that means I'm not a snitch.

:lolngin:lol:lolr

Look man, if you are in a thread, the chances of it getting locked deleted or moderated are astronomical. :lmao

Going on T:lmaolt

[dabom]

Apol didn't say if Pop goes out of his way to hog the media. Just if he is the beneficiary of his star players. Which he is.

[ChumpDumper]

Look man, if you are in a thread, the chances of it getting locked deleted or moderated are astronomical. :lmao

Going on T:lmaoltQuantify those odds you claim.

[ChumpDumper]

Apol didn't say if Pop goes out of his way to hog the media.He absolutely did.

That's what "hog" means, dumbass.

[dabom]

Quantify those odds you claim.


Look man, if you are in a thread, the chances of it getting locked deleted or moderated are astronomical. :lmao

Going on T:lmaolt

[ChumpDumper]

"Astronomical" is not a quantity. :lmao

You really need that explained to you? :lmao

No wonder you aren't an engineer. :lmao

[dabom]

He absolutely did.

That's what "hog" means, dumbass.

"someone who ​takes (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/take) much more than a ​fair (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fair) ​share (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/share) of something"

Pop takes the biggest share without directly doing it faggot. :lmao

[dabom]

"Astronomical" is not a quantity. :lmao

You really need that explained to you? :lmao

No wonder you aren't an engineer. :lmao


Quantify those odds you claim.

Now you are changing meanings faggot. :lmao























:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

"someone who ​takes (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/take) much more than a ​fair (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/fair) ​share (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/share) of something"

Pop takes the biggest share without directly doing it faggot. :lmao"to take, keep, or use (something) in a way that prevents other people or things from having or using it" :lmao

He has done nothing of the sort.

[dabom]

:lmao





You are the biggest dumbass on ST. Serious. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Now you are changing meanings faggot. :lmao























:lmaoQUANTIFY : to find or calculate the quantity or amount of (something)

:lmao

What do you think it means?

[apalisoc_9]

I'm forever going to be butthurt with the general narrative of the spurs specially relating to timmy from 2003-2007..and manu 2005.

People forget that Pop was super dependant on his stars in those stretch just as much any team depending on their superstars and even more.

Kawhi too..

TD is easily top 5 of all time if this narrative is thrown out of the window.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao





You are the biggest dumbass on ST. Serious. :lmaoYou're the one who doesn't know the meaning of "hog" or quantify."































































:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I'm forever going to be butthurtNo kidding.

[dabom]

QUANTIFY : to find or calculate the quantity or amount of (something)

:lmao

What do you think it means?

No dumbass.

google.com

"quantify"

quan·ti·fy
ˈkwän(t)əˌfī/
verb



1.
express or measure the quantity of.








I expressed it faggot. :lmao

[dabom]

You stay losing faggot. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

No dumbass.

google.com

"quantify"

quan·ti·fy
ˈkwän(t)əˌfī/
verb



1.
express or measure the quantity of.








I expressed it faggot. :lmaoAgain, you're no engineer. I can quantify that with two simple definitions you completely whiffed on. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You stay losing faggot. :lmaolol dabom meltdown

[dabom]

It's alright. You lost. You don't even know the difference between quantify and quantity. :lmao

It's not you who I have to convince. :lmao

[dabom]

This is why you should stick to arguing with kids. You always embarrass yourself when you talk to me. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

It's alright. You lost. You don't even know the difference between quantify and quantity.I sure didn't ask you to quantity anything.

:cryYou stay losing faggot:cry

[apalisoc_9]

Dabom's dick on chump anus while @RGCME pounds his mouth.

Chump getting pounded today.

[ChumpDumper]

This is why you should stick to arguing with kids. You always embarrass yourself when you talk to me. :lmao:cryYou stay losing faggot:cry

[ChumpDumper]

Dabom's dick on chump anus while @RGCME pounds his mouth.

Chump getting pounded today.lol calling your krew members homosexuals.
I'm forever going to be butthurt

[dabom]

Dabom's dick on chump anus while @RGCME pounds his mouth.

Chump getting pounded today.

I don't even try to pick on him. He just does that himself. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

I don't even try to pick on him. He just does that himself. :lol:cryYou stay losing faggot:cry

[hater]

Lol reddit threads get banned but not this orgy of retards

:lol slomo

[ChumpDumper]

Lol reddit threads get banned but not this orgy of retards

:lol slomo:lol Shiite cosmored

[dabom]

Lol reddit threads get banned but not this orgy of retards

:lol slomo

Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[ChumpDumper]

Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...lol "chances is"

Your English just falls apart the madder you get.

[hater]

:lmao feuding retard krews defendinv their thread :lmao

[dabom]

Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...


lol "chances is"

Your English just falls apart the madder you get.

What are you talking about? I never put "chances is". :lmao

[dabom]

Chump losing it now. :lmao














































:lmao
















































:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

What are you talking about? I never put "chances is". :lmaoYou just quoted it, dumbass. :lmao
Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[dabom]

You just quoted it, dumbass. :lmao


Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...


lol "chances is"

Your English just falls apart the madder you get.


:wtf ????

















































:lmao

[dabom]

Stop yourself chump. Not even funny for me anymore...


:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:wtf ????I understand you are confused.

[ChumpDumper]

Stop yourself chump. Not even funny for me anymore...


:lmaoBolding your mistake is hilarious for me.

[dabom]

I understand you are confused.

Just stop typing. :lmao

Everyone looking at you like a dumbass. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Just stop typing. :lmao

Everyone looking at you like a dumbass. :lmaoQuote yourself again.

:cryChances is:cry

[dabom]

.............?

Since when is "chances is" "chances of this"? Only in chump's mind. :lmao

[dabom]

I'm just going to stop replying to you faggot. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

.............?

Since when is "chances is" "chances of this"? Only in chump's mind. :lmaohttp://lmgtfy.com/?q=subject+verb+agreement :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I'm just going to stop replying to you faggot. :lmaoGot to go engineer some more great sentences?

[dabom]

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=subject+verb+agreement :lmao

"Chances of this" is proper English dumbass. Look it up. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

"Chances of this" is proper English dumbass. Look it up. :lmaoClick the link.


I'm really trying to help you now.

I'm just going to stop replying to you faggot. :lmaoWell, you failed there too.

[dabom]

Click the link.


I'm really trying to help you now.
Well, you failed there too.

I did. Had nothing to do with my sentence. You don't know proper sentences. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

What is the subject of this sentence, dabom?
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[dabom]

What is the subject of this sentence, dabom?

I ain't here to answer questions like a lapdog. Look up "what are the chances of this happening?"

"Chances of this" is proper English dumbass. :lmao

Seriously, you are a faggot. :lmao

[dabom]

Three consecutive arguments you just lost. :lmao

[dabom]

Faggot :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

I ain't here to answer questions like a lapdog. Look up "what are the chances of this happening?"Why did you use "are" instead of "is" this time?

[dabom]

Why did you use "are" instead of "is" this time?

The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao




































:lmao























FAIL :lmao

[dabom]

Do you need to go back to elementary faggot? :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao




































:lmao























FAIL :lmaoYes, it certainly is a failure on your part, but prepositional phrases can be tricky for people who claim to be engineers.

[ChumpDumper]

Do you need to go back to elementary faggot? :lmao
Is that where you learned this?

The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao

[dabom]

You keep embarrassing yourself. Just stop dude. :lmao

Some more of that "face to fist" technique. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You keep embarrassing yourself. Just stop dude. :lmao

Some more of that "face to fist" technique. :lmao


The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmaoIndeed.

[dabom]

I'm not going to correct my punctuation because I'm lazy and this isn't English class. My phrase still stands correct"," faggot. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not going to correct my punctuation because I'm lazy and this isn't English class. My phrase still stands correct"," faggot. :lmaoI said nothing about punctuation.
The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmaolol

[Floyd Pacquiao]

*Opens thread
*sees chumpdumper being a fucking geek per par
*exits thread

[dabom]

For being so "unpopular", no one trying to correct me except you, faggot. :lmao

Hold this :lma. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

For being so "unpopular", no one trying to correct me except you, faggot. :lmaoNo one said anything about popularity.
The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmaolol

[ChumpDumper]

*Opens thread
*sees chumpdumper being a fucking geek per par
*exits threadYou forgot:

*logs into other screen name

[Floyd Pacquiao]

You forgot:

*logs into other screen name

Yeah, no. Get a life loser.

[dabom]

No one said anything about popularity.lol


Chump got embarrassed. Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...


I ain't here to answer questions like a lapdog. Look up "what are the chances of this happening?"

"Chances of this" is proper English dumbass. :lmao

Seriously, you are a faggot. :lmao


The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao




































:lmao























FAIL :lmao


For being so "unpopular", no one trying to correct me except you, faggot. :lmao

Hold this :lma. :lmao

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Yeah, no. Get a life loser.lol you can't even exit the thread like you said you did.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmaoI love how you keep quoting it for me.
The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao

[dabom]

Have some self respect for yourself. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Have some self respect for yourself. :lmao
The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmao

[NameLess Scrub]

Quantify is putting a quantity on something.. everybody knows that.
Am I missing something?

[dabom]

Learn some sentence structure. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Quantify is putting a quantity on something.. everybody knows that.
Am I missing something?dabom received an "Astronomical" on his engineering exam.

[ChumpDumper]

Learn some sentence structure. :lmao
The "is" in my sentence is singular for "thread". The "are" in "what are the chances of this" is plural for "chances" faggot. :lmaoThe best part is I told you exactly where you screwed up and you keep doubling down.

[dabom]

Quantify is putting a quantity on something.. everybody knows that.
Am I missing something?

google "quantify"

Copy and paste everything on there. I'll explain what the words mean to you.

[dabom]

The best part is I told you exactly where you screwed up and you keep doubling down.

Can you explain how the phrase "chances of this" is used between my sentences, faggot? :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Can you explain how the phrase "chances of this" is used between my sentences, faggot? :lmaoActually I asked you what the subject of this sentence is:
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...Well?

[dabom]

Actually I asked you what the subject of this sentence is:Well?

I'm glad you understand. :tu

I'm done taking your cookies. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I'm glad you understand. :tu

I'm done taking your cookies. :lmaoWhy are you afraid to answer this simple question?

What is the subject of this sentence?
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...I'll be glad to answer yours once you answer mine that I asked an hour ago.

[NameLess Scrub]

Simple Definition of quantify
Popularity: Top 20% of words




: to find or calculate the quantity or amount of (something)





Full Definition of quantify quan·ti·fiedquan·ti·fy·ing



transitive verb
1 a (1) : to limit by a quantifier (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quantifier) (2) : to bind by prefixing a quantifier b : to make explicit the logical quantity (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quantity) of


2 : to determine, express, or measure the quantity of



quan·ti·fi·able play \ˌkwän-tə-ˈfī-ə-bəl\ adjective




An example of quantify is to count the number of times a word was misspelled in a book.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantify#7BgjLeeE2eLHEhda.99


To assign a quantity (http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantity) to.
To determine the value (http://www.yourdictionary.com/value) of (a variable or expression).

Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantify#pGDv1SxiJgdbTzk6.99



When you said "astronomical", I think you used an adjective there.

To quantify you had to say something like: "3 out of 4 of the threads you get in and don't like are locked".

[dabom]

Why are you afraid to answer this simple question?

What is the subject of this sentence?I'll be glad to answer yours once you answer mine that I asked an hour ago.

Your shtick is oozing again. :lmao

[Capster]

Do you have to make a new thread to voice every dumb-ass, pointless, baseless question that wafts through the space in between your ears?
You are a joke. If the thread doesn't interest you, move on.

[dabom]

Simple Definition of quantify


Popularity: Top 20% of words




: to find or calculate the quantity or amount of (something)




Full Definition of quantify

quan·ti·fiedquan·ti·fy·ing



transitive verb
1 a (1) : to limit by a quantifier (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quantifier) (2) : to bind by prefixing a quantifier b : to make explicit the logical quantity (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quantity) of
2 : to determine, express, or measure the quantity of


quan·ti·fi·able play \ˌkwän-tə-ˈfī-ə-bəl\ adjective




An example of quantify is to count the number of times a word was misspelled in a book.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantify#7BgjLeeE2eLHEhda.99


To assign a quantity (http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantity) to.
To determine the value (http://www.yourdictionary.com/value) of (a variable or expression).

Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantify#pGDv1SxiJgdbTzk6.99



When you said "astronomical", I think you used an adjective there.

To quantify you had to say something like: "3 out of 4 of the threads you get in and don't like are locked".

I expressed it as "astronomical". You got that?

[ChumpDumper]

Your shtick is oozing again. :lmaoSo do you not know what the subject of this sentence is --

Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...
-- or are you stonewalling for some other reason?

Just answer the simple question.

It's really quite easy.

[ChumpDumper]

I expressed it as "astronomical". You got that?That isn't a quantity.

[dabom]

That isn't a quantity.

That's because we are defining "quantify", faggot. :lmao

[spurraider21]

:lmao jesus... get a room you two

https://i.gyazo.com/35512a43750fc2afcb8b4678a57baa2c.png

[ChumpDumper]

That's because we are defining "quantify", faggot. :lmaoto determine, express, or measure the quantity of

It's the definition you used.

[TheGreatYacht]

Can y'all move "this" to another thread? One that's not shit?

[dabom]

to determine, express, or measure the quantity of

It's the definition you used.

Do you know what "express" is?

[ChumpDumper]

Do you know what "express" is?Yes.

You did not express a quantity.

Your definition.

Now, what is the subject of this sentence?

Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[NameLess Scrub]

That's because we are defining "quantify", faggot. :lmao

Quantify is the verb used to put a quantity on something. You express something, and that something is a quantity.

Which is why I included this example:

An example of quantify is to count the number of times a word was misspelled in a book.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/quanti...eeE2eLHEhda.99 (http://www.yourdictionary.com/quantify#7BgjLeeE2eLHEhda.99)

Astronomical is an adjective you're assigning to the chances.

In the sentence above you said "chances" then "is" to describe the chances. You mixed up single and plural there.

It doesn't really matter that much. This is not an English board. But if you're not trolling this is one battle you actually can't win.

[houston spurs fan]

to determine, express, or measure the quantity of

It's the definition you used.
Chump, this kid is a modest talent. This is beneath you bro...

[dabom]

Yes.

You did not express a quantity.

Your definition.

Now, what is the subject of this sentence?

The "express" is standalone dumbass. :lmao

[NameLess Scrub]

:lmao jesus... get a room you two

https://i.gyazo.com/35512a43750fc2afcb8b4678a57baa2c.png

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

The "express" is standalone dumbass. :lmaoThat's not how definitions work.

Now, what is the subject of this sentence?

Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[ChumpDumper]

Chump, this kid is a modest talent. This is beneath you bro...Watching him repeat his errors over and over again with such conviction is kind of fascinating. He's the Kobe Bryant jump shot of SpursTalk.

[NameLess Scrub]

On the off chance that the OP is a serious question, the answer is NO.

The fact that Pop is getting a lot of attention today is that he had the wit to change his team's approach to scoring as his 'superstar' aged and could no longer carry the team by himself and that said change was so successful, it not only kept the Spurs on the top of the heap with respect to annual season wins and playoff appearances as Tim aged, but it spread throughout the NBA as the method for consistently superior performance.

Pop is ALWAYS giving props to his players, most especially Timmy over the years.

If it were not for Pop's requirement that players occasionally sit out and rest and that they only return after injury when the risk of re-injury is considerably lessened, the Spurs players you mentioned would not have careers as long as they have had. The length of their careers means more awards for the players, and increases their ties to Pop. Had Pop been like most coaches, Tim would have been burned out long ago, and Manu wouldn't be able to walk by this season, much less be a major contributor on a title contending team.

Why do you try to force everything into a zero-sum game? People have been talking about Pop lately because he was the coach of the All-Star game. When they are talking about Tim, they talk about him as the best power forward of all time. Kawhi is on the cover of Sports Illustrated right now. Manu is hurt so out of the limelight right now, but no-one in the mainstream sports media ever suggests that he is anything short of a shoe-in for first ballot Hall of Fame.

So - what, exactly, is your bitch about Pop?

I think is funny how you seemed polite the entire post, up until the last sentence.

[dabom]

Even if you don't, quantity is "chances" expressed as "astronomical". :lmao

[NameLess Scrub]

Watching him repeat his errors over and over again with such conviction is kind of fascinating. He's the Kobe Bryant jump shot of SpursTalk.

I was wondering why you keep this back and forth.. I guess I see why now..

[ChumpDumper]

Even if you don't, quantity is "chances" expressed as "astronomical". :lmaoThat's not a quantity.

[dabom]

That's not a quantity.

Look it up.

[ChumpDumper]

Look it up.Already did.

It's not a quantity.

Now, what is the subject of this sentence?

Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[dabom]

quantity



[kwon-ti-tee]
Spell Syllables



Examples (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/source-example-sentences)
Word Origin (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/source-word-origin)


See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com (http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/quantity)
noun, plural quantities.1.a particular or indefinite amount of anything:a small quantity of milk; the ocean's vast quantity of fish.


2.an exact or specified amount or measure:Mix the ingredients in the quantities called for.


3.a considerable or great amount:to extract ore in quantity.


4.Mathematics.

the property of magnitude involving comparability with othermagnitudes.
something having magnitude, or size, extent, amount, or the like.
magnitude, size, volume, area, or length.



5.Music. the length or duration of a note.

6.Logic. the character of a proposition as singular, universal, particular, ormixed, according to the presence or absence of certain kinds ofquantifiers.

7.that amount, degree, etc., in terms of which another is greater orlesser.





:lmao









































:lmao

[dabom]

do we need to look further?

in·def·i·nite
ˌinˈdef(ə)nət/
adjective



lasting for an unknown or unstated length of time.
"they may face indefinite detention"


synonyms:
indeterminate (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+indeterminate&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIHzAA), unspecified (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unspecified&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIIDAA), unlimited (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unlimited&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIITAA), unrestricted (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unrestricted&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIIjAA), undecided (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+undecided&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIIzAA),und etermined (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+undetermined&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIJDAA), undefined (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+undefined&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIJTAA), unfixed (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unfixed&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIJjAA), unsettled (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unsettled&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIJzAA), unknown (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unknown&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIKDAA), uncertain (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+uncertain&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIKTAA); More


















not clearly expressed or defined; vague.
"their status remains indefinite"


synonyms:
vague (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+vague&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIMjAA), ill-defined (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ill-defined&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIMzAA), unclear (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+unclear&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoINDAA), imprecise (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+imprecise&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoINTAA), inexact (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+inexact&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoINjAA), loose (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+loose&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoINzAA), general (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+general&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIODAA), nebulous (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+nebulous&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIOTAA),fuz zy (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+fuzzy&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIOjAA), hazy (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+hazy&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIOzAA), obscure (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+obscure&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIPDAA), ambiguous (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+ambiguous&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIPTAA), equivocal (https://www.google.com/search?q=define+equivocal&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ6ZX93ILLAhWLtRQKHeL9BBIQ_SoIPjAA)"an indefinite idea"








:lmao

[dabom]

"Chances" is the "quantity" "expressed" as "astronomical". :lmao




:lmao

[dabom]

Hold this :lma. :lmao

[dabom]

Anymore explanations for ya cucks? :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

"Chances" is the "quantity" "expressed" as "astronomical". :lmao




:lmaolol chances is

You're still doing it.

And you're pretending I was asking for an indefinite quantity. That's so precious.

[dabom]

You bore me chump. :lmao.

[ChumpDumper]

Anymore explanations for ya cucks? :lmaoYes, what is the subject of this sentence?
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[dabom]

Yes, what is the subject of this sentence?

Guess you need to go back to elementary chump...

[ChumpDumper]

Guess you need to go back to elementary chump...You offered to provide me an explanation.


Anymore explanations for ya cucks? :lmaoDon't run away from it out now.

What is the subject of this sentence?


Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[ChumpDumper]

There are currently 27 users browsing this thread. (12 members and 15 guests)
ChumpDumper, houston spurs fan, SpursFan86, Ditty, azarel, NameLess Scrub, letmk, scanry, pgardn, T_L_P, weeks, daledondale

lol he did run away.

[dabom]

I took a shower dude...

[ChumpDumper]

I took a shower dude...Great, now can provide me with the explanation you offered.

What is the subject of this sentence?


Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[dabom]

Shtick brah. :td

[ChumpDumper]

Shtick brah. :tdYou offered:


Anymore explanations for ya cucks? :lmaoI'm asking:

What is the subject of this sentence?
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...You didn't offer to stonewall or run away again.

You offered an explanation.

[dabom]

You offered:

I'm asking:

What is the subject of this sentence?You didn't offer to stonewall or run away again.

You offered an explanation.

I guess I decline.

[ChumpDumper]

I guess I decline.Run away, then.

lol after all your big talk, you can't even say what the subject of this sentence is:
Chances of this thread getting locked is astronomical...

[jhfenton]

You are a joke. If the thread doesn't interest you, move on.

And who the hell are you, newbie Spurs fan, that you assume the role of self-appointed thread cop? apalisoc_9 is the most annoying poster I've seen in my 11 years on this forum. The place would be far better if he were pinked and banned from starting new threads. If I occasionally want to bitch about a post that is ridiculous by even his appallingly low standards, I will do so.

[Silver&Black]

:lmao jesus... get a room you two

https://i.gyazo.com/35512a43750fc2afcb8b4678a57baa2c.png

:wow

[midnightpulp]

Pop doesn't willingly hog any credit, and would probably be the first to credit Tim and Company for the Spurs' success, but if you're referring to the media lavishing more credit on Pop than he probably deserves, then I agree.

As Harlem said in earlier post, the "system" meme has gotten out of hand since 2014 (I also think Kevin Durant deserves some blame when he said "Kawhi is only doing work because of the system.")

There isn't a single systematic blueprint the Spurs have in some magic binder. Pop will design the offensive and defensive systems around the strengths of his core players. In the mid-00s, pretty much everything was built around Duncan. From 4 down to the corner 3 (which Pop indeed pioneered, but its sole purpose was to protect Duncan from double teams/punish teams when they double, as passing out of the low post to the corner is the easiest pass to make from the low block). And the lanes Parker and Manu had in those days were also a result of Duncan collapsing defenses and being the best sealer of all-time. And to the way the defense was designed to funnel wings into Duncan. You can take a look a the on/off numbers from that era, and the defensive rating plummeted when Duncan was off. A "system" implies plug-and-play, and it's not like you could've plugged in Menke Bateer and had similar results.

Pop revised the system post-08 as the league was moving toward a faster perimeter oriented, drive-and-kick game. Thus the Dick signing. Another revision took place in the "Beautiful Game," which was designed out of necessity, the necessity being able to counter elite teams like Miami and the Thunder who overmatched the Spurs athletically. Now we see it's being revised around the strengths of Kawhi and LMA.

Pop does indeed deserve credit for being smart in his revisions (unlike Phil Jackson, who forces the Triangle no matter the roster), but the players precede the system's design.

[spurraider21]

updated tally

https://i.gyazo.com/81a49af927ed194200da191dfe618c6e.png