most powerful neocon Robert Kagan endorses Hillary Clinton

[hater]

:lol

http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/wwjtd/files/2012/10/we-are-so-fucked.jpg

https://consortiumnews.com/2016/02/25/neocon-kagan-endorses-hillary-clinton/

Hillary Clinton’s cozy ties to Washington’s powerful neocons have paid off with the endorsement of Robert Kagan, one of the most influential neocons.

a co-founder of the infamous Project for the New American Century, has endorsed Clinton raises questions for Democrats who have so far given the former New York senator and Secretary of State mostly a pass on her pro-interventionist policies.

The fact is that Clinton has generally marched in lock step with the neocons as they have implemented an aggressive “regime change” strategy against governments and political movements that don’t toe Washington’s line or that deviate from Israel’s goals in the Middle East. So she has backed coups, such as in Honduras (2009) and Ukraine (2014); invasions, such as Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011); and subversions such as Syria (from 2011 to the present) – all with various degrees of disastrous results.

[hater]

:lmao

Shillary Clinton the last hope of the neocons :lol

[hater]

Kagan, whose Project for the New American Century wrote the blueprint for George W. Bush’s disastrous Iraq War, is now abandoning the Republican Party in favor of Hillary Clinton.

:lmao neocons abandoning the GOP and joining the Clintons

holy shit :lol

[ElNono]

Trump is the GOP’s Frankenstein monster. Now he’s strong enough to destroy the party.
By Robert Kagan February 25 at 11:08 AM

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-is-the-gops-frankenstein-monster-now-hes-strong-enough-to-destroy-the-party/2016/02/25/3e443f28-dbc1-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html

[DMX7]

:lmao

Shillary Clinton the last hope of the neocons :lol

That is depressing.

[hater]

It's a brilliant move by the neocons tbh

they are basically switching parties :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Is Trump any less of an interventionalist?

I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all.

[Splits]

The only thing surprising about this is that Sanders' campaign is not talking about it. It has been the crux of the liberal argument against Shillary and why most of us hate her. To me, it is political malpractice that Bernie doesn't pound this message home in every stump speech and every debate.

[spurraider21]

:cry :lol :cry :lol :cry

https://i.gyazo.com/9d2dc90e89228534dd508b9e17d46694.png

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

The only thing surprising about this is that Sanders' campaign is not talking about it. It has been the crux of the liberal argument against Shillary and why most of us hate her. To me, it is political malpractice that Bernie doesn't pound this message home in every stump speech and every debate.

You're just now realizing Bernie is controlled opposition?

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Kagan, whose Project for the New American Century wrote the blueprint for George W. Bush’s disastrous Iraq War, is now abandoning the Republican Party in favor of Hillary Clinton.

:lmao neocons abandoning the GOP and joining the Clintons

holy shit :lol

look who his wife is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kagan

The GOPe and DNCe are two sides of the same Jew coin

[hater]

holy shit Victoria Newland. Bitch basically engineer the entire Ukranian disaster

[101A]

Is Trump any less of an interventionalist?

I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all.

Then pay attention.

Just last night Trump railed on multiple interventions "We'd be better off is Saddam and Qaddafi were still around".

[ChumpDumper]

Then pay attention.

Just last night Trump railed on multiple interventions "We'd be better off is Saddam and Qaddafi were still around".He was for the Iraq invasion before he was against it.

[boutons_deux]

No surprise neocon Kagan would endorse neocon Hillary, keeping MIC corporate welfare flowing full blast.

btw, Kagan's neocunt wife, Victoria Nuland, is the bitch who overthrew Putin's puppet in Ukraine and started that entire mess.

[hater]

He was for the Iraq invasion before he was against it.

Link or STFU

[ChumpDumper]

Link or STFU2002:

“Are you for invading Iraq?” Stern asked.
“Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-iraq-war-219471#ixzz41JIkA9Kh

lol hater

lol 101A

[hater]

2002:

“Are you for invading Iraq?” Stern asked.
“Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-iraq-war-219471#ixzz41JIkA9Kh

lol hater

lol 101A

Post the video or STFU

lol politico

[ChumpDumper]

Post the video or STFUlol hater meltdown

[101A]

2002:

“Are you for invading Iraq?” Stern asked.
“Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.”


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/donald-trump-iraq-war-219471#ixzz41JIkA9Kh

lol hater

lol 101A

lol interview on Howard Stern by a civilian asked an off the cuff question vs a presidential candidate (sic) during a debate. You asked if there was evidence Trump was not a neocon. If you watched the debate LAST NIGHT you would see there is current, solid, evidence of that. Also, if you noticed his subtle critique (sic) of GW's invasion of Iraq toward a past-candidate you might have heard of (initials are JB) you might also see that there is some evidence Trump does NOT share Hillary's apparent neoconistic tendencies. But keep spinning, Chumpy, some people still buy your schtick.

[ChumpDumper]

lol interview on Howard Stern by a civilian asked an off the cuff question vs a presidential candidate (sic) during a debate. You asked if there was evidence Trump was not a neocon. If you watched the debate LAST NIGHT you would see there is current, solid, evidence of that. Also, if you noticed his subtle critique (sic) of GW's invasion of Iraq toward a past-candidate you might have heard of (initials are JB) you might also see that there is some evidence Trump does NOT share Hillary's apparent neoconistic tendencies. But keep spinning, Chumpy, some people still buy your schtick.lol 101A

Dude flat out say he was for the invasion of Iraq.

You can't spin it.

[101A]

Is Trump any less of an interventionalist?

I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all.

Haven't seen ANYTHING to suggest that at all?

So you stopped watching any news since listening to an interview on Howard Stern 14 years ago?

[101A]

and pay attention. AT least watch the debates if you are going to post in the political forum.

[hater]

lol interview on Howard Stern by a civilian asked an off the cuff question vs a presidential candidate (sic) during a debate. You asked if there was evidence Trump was not a neocon. If you watched the debate LAST NIGHT you would see there is current, solid, evidence of that. Also, if you noticed his subtle critique (sic) of GW's invasion of Iraq toward a past-candidate you might have heard of (initials are JB) you might also see that there is some evidence Trump does NOT share Hillary's apparent neoconistic tendencies. But keep spinning, Chumpy, some people still buy your schtick.

:lmao pretty much

what an idiot :lol

not to mention Trump is the least interventionalist of them all. He wants to get out of the middle east, let them fend for each other and work with the Russians to fight terrorism

he also says Iraq was one of the worst disasters in our history. He is the only candidate that has the balls to say it.

Trump it is

[ChumpDumper]

Trump was for the invasion before he was against it.

You can't spin that.

lol hater

lol 101A

[ElNono]

I think everybody knew she was a neocon before any endorsement...

[ChumpDumper]

Hell, Donald wanted to bomb Iraqi oil fields when ISIS gets most of it's oil from Syrian fields.

How can you support a guy who can't even bomb the right country?

lol hater

lol 101A

[TheSanityAnnex]

Hell, Donald wanted to bomb Iraqi oil fields when ISIS gets most of it's oil from Syrian fields.

How can you support a guy who can't even bomb the right country?

lol hater

lol 101A
Who will you be supporting in the upcoming election?

[baseline bum]

Speaking of powerful neocon endorsments


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63s47JnAkAM

[101A]

Is Trump any less of an interventionalist?

I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all.

Are you going to admit you haven't been paying attention?

You could has said, "I have seen something that suggests Trump is an interventionist." But you didn't. You made an absolute post that has been discredited. I didn't make that post - I suggested you haven't been paying attention; that there is plenty to suggest Trump is not the interventionist Clinton is. You post a weak quote from a radio program over a decade ago, then you disappear from the thread for a few hours hoping I will (as I usually do) disappear for the weekend, and you try to save some face by posting about Trump being for the invasion before he was against it.

Looks like he was.

Doesn't change the fact that you aren't paying attention.

[boutons_deux]

news says Christie sold his voter list to Rubio a couple weeks ago, but now endorses Trump

[velik_m]

Is Trump any less of an interventionalist?

I haven't seen anything to suggest that at all.

USA foreign policy will not change regardless of who gets elected president. Trump, Clinton. Cruz, Sanders - it will be the same shit as now - shortsighted and aggresive to appear they are doing something of value.

[Will Hunting]

USA foreign policy will not change regardless of who gets elected president. Trump, Clinton. Cruz, Sanders - it will be the same shit as now - shortsighted and aggresive to appear they are doing something of value.

It would change if Clinton, Cruz or Rubio got elected because it would get a lot worse.

[hater]

yup