Who wins more regular season games: Spurs w/o Kawhi or Warriors w/o Curry?

[spursistan]

If replaced by their backups..Kyle for Kiwi and Livingston for Curry?

Still think Spurs by a couple or 3 games..48 wins to 46 ..

[313]

Spurs would be a 35-40 win team MAYBE, without Kawhi and Having Kyle as the starter. Kawhi's value is magnified by the fact that we have no true back up SF. Warriors would still win 50~ games. Livingston was a top 5 pick, he's pretty good.

[Mitch]

Probably Spurs, Klay can't carry an offense on regular basis. Their records would be close, tho

[spursistan]

Spurs would be a 35-40 win team MAYBE, without Kawhi and Having Kyle as the starter. Kawhi's value is magnified by the fact that we have no true back up SF. Warriors would still win 50~ games. Livingston was a top 5 pick, he's pretty good.

this 2016 NBA..shitty teams all over the map.. Boston is winning likely in high 40s by having a bunch of six men being well-coached..

[Kawhitstorm]

Spurs would be the equivalent of the Blazers during Lillard's rookie season while the Worriers would be the equivalent of the Hawks.

[Mal]

I know who probably would not make playoff without their best player - Cavs

[benefactor]

Probably Spurs, Klay can't carry an offense on regular basis. Their records would be close, tho
Pretty much. Both are well coached and would beat up on bad teams, but they would get their shit pushed in by the good ones.

[Brazil]

Probably Spurs, Klay can't carry an offense on regular basis. Their records would be close, tho


Pretty much. Both are well coached and would beat up on bad teams, but they would get their shit pushed in by the good ones.

:tu

[Kidd K]

Spurs. Curry carries the Warriors hard as fuck. Spurs have been winning every season since some of you were even born. . .meanwhile GSW didn't even have 4 50 win seasons in their franchise history of nearly 70 years til a couple seasons ago when Curry started to really put it together. So literally, 4 50 win seasons for GSW without Curry in nearly 70 years, 3 with him in the last 3.

Not knocking Kawhi, but he doesn't carry SAS the way Curry does the GSW. We clearly won't win a title without Kawhi, but GSW would be as mediocre as ever without Curry imo.

[Benoit]

Kawhi is a top 10 player but he's a product of Pops system

If you take him out, Spurs wouldn't contend but they would still win 50 games with Pop at the helm

[313]

Kawhi is a top 10 player but he's a product of Pops system

If you take him out, Spurs wouldn't contend but they would still win 50 games with Pop at the helm
They've routinely been a .500 team without Kawhu over the years. The Dubs still have Green and Klay on offense, and the 6man oty to round a great bench.