PDA

View Full Version : Active shooter at Lackland AFB



Splits
04-08-2016, 09:50 AM
http://www.ksat.com/news/bcso-responding-to-shooting-at-lackland-air-force-base


SAN ANTONIO - The Bexar County Sheriff's Office is reporting at least two people are dead in a shooting at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland Air Force Base.

The Bexar County Sheriff's Office is reporting that the gunman is still active and the base is presently on lockdown.

The incident occurred around 8:45 a.m.

KSAT 12 has also learned Valley High Elementary School of the Northside Independent School District, located in the 8500 block of Ray Ellison Boulevard, is on lockdown as well.

KSAT 12 has a crew headed to the scene and will have more information on this story as it develops.


Need our local terrorism arbiters spurraider and TSA on hand to determine if this is terror.

Blake
04-08-2016, 09:54 AM
Hopefully the kids at the elementary school are carrying

boutons_deux
04-08-2016, 09:55 AM
American as (GMO) apple pie and (in vitro) motherhood

yawn

Pelicans78
04-08-2016, 09:55 AM
Either a Muslim terrorist, black thug, or mentally disturbed white guy illegally carrying guns.

Splits
04-08-2016, 09:57 AM
Fucking gun-free zones. People are sitting ducks.

boutons_deux
04-08-2016, 09:59 AM
Hopefully the kids at the elementary school are carrying

... and ALL the staff, "hopefully"

Splits
04-08-2016, 10:00 AM
718452526069059585

Hmmm, murder-suicide. If he was wearing a vest then terrorism. Using a gun then crazy guy.

boutons_deux
04-08-2016, 10:00 AM
SA's having a great week in national news. Police brutality and mass shootings!

Trill Clinton
04-08-2016, 10:14 AM
lone wolf

Splits
04-08-2016, 10:17 AM
Appears to be workplace violence: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/04/08/authorities-respond-to-reports-of-shooting-at-lackland-air-force-base/


Keith said police did not have any information about any possible motive or a relationship between the two people who were killed. Another law enforcement official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that the incident appears to have emanated from a dispute.

Phew, so relieved it wasn't serious.

pgardn
04-08-2016, 10:40 AM
SA's having a great week in national news. Police brutality and mass shootings!

"Mass" shootings... ,!!!!

Boots, you got a real problem involving running off with the playground ball.

I. Hustle
04-08-2016, 10:44 AM
Hopefully the kids at the elementary school are carrying

Hahaha that's hilarious.

Potential violence towards children is too damn funny. Good one, Blake.

Splits
04-08-2016, 10:54 AM
Hahaha that's hilarious.

Potential violence towards children is too damn funny. Good one, Blake.

You do realize that "more guns in schools" was the NRA Sandy Hook response, right?

I. Hustle
04-08-2016, 11:00 AM
You do realize that "more guns in schools" was the NRA Sandy Hook response, right?

Was it really? That's weird that they would want elementary school kids packing. I mean, since that's what Blake said and that's what I was commenting on. Did I read it incorrectly?

I am not saying that I am for more guns in school or for ANY guns in school. I just don't think it's funny that, even though nothing happened, there was potential threat towards elementary school children.

spurraider21
04-08-2016, 11:02 AM
if he's white it's domestic terrorism

if he's not white then he isn't representative of [insert minority group]

Pelicans78
04-08-2016, 11:18 AM
You do realize that "more guns in schools" was the NRA Sandy Hook response, right?

It wasn't children carrying guns. They meant security personnel.

boutons_deux
04-08-2016, 11:24 AM
It wasn't children carrying guns. They meant security personnel.

no, BigGun, the NRA and their gun fellatin wingnuts want guns for teachers and staff, and for all college students (eg, in TX).

Spurminator
04-08-2016, 11:24 AM
if he's not white then he isn't representative of [insert minority group]

Yeah lol, can you believe people say that?

spurraider21
04-08-2016, 11:27 AM
Yeah lol, can you believe people say that?
i don't disagree with either statement. i just know different themes are going to be pushed based on the background of the shooter

basically this

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CH48vUfWUAAVD5D.png

Blake
04-08-2016, 11:33 AM
Was it really? That's weird that they would want elementary school kids packing. I mean, since that's what Blake said and that's what I was commenting on. Did I read it incorrectly?

I am not saying that I am for more guns in school or for ANY guns in school. I just don't think it's funny that, even though nothing happened, there was potential threat towards elementary school children.

Nobody thinks the incident today was funny, genius.

Spurminator
04-08-2016, 11:35 AM
i don't disagree with either statement. i just know different themes are going to be pushed based on the background of the shooter

Sure, but it's not like they are equal. When the predictable types come out of the woodwork to celebrate the revealing that a shooter is black/Muslim/whatever and blaming entire ethnicities and religions on their actions, what you posted is what the response should be.




basically this

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CH48vUfWUAAVD5D.png

I see this image posted a lot. The "White America" article is about the double standard when it comes to asking black people to answer for black crime.

http://www.salon.com/2015/06/18/charleston_church_massacre_the_violence_white_amer ica_must_answer_for/

So while Salon does veer a little too heavily into SJW territory at times, these tweets aren't exactly contradictory.

That meme is basically like putting Bomani Jones' T-shirt next to an article on ESPN about why the Indians need to change their name, then calling them hypocrites.

Splits
04-08-2016, 11:38 AM
It wasn't children carrying guns. They meant security personnel.

No, it was teachers, which I think is repulsive.

And you do have crazy pols that think kids packing is something to promote.

Meet Michelle Fiore, Nevada St rep running for congress:


http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2456225.1449330972!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/fiore6n-1-web.jpg

Look at cute little 6 year old Jake with his P22!

Adorable!

I. Hustle
04-08-2016, 11:42 AM
Nobody thinks the incident today was funny, genius.

Oh, ok. My bad. I misunderstood. I guess it was because you were making jokes about it. I thought jokes were meant to be funny.

My bad

Blake
04-08-2016, 11:47 AM
Oh, ok. My bad. I misunderstood. I guess it was because you were making jokes about it. I thought jokes were meant to be funny.

My bad

Yeah, I figured by your response that the joke was over your head. Apology accepted.

I. Hustle
04-08-2016, 01:24 PM
Yeah, I figured by your response that the joke was over your head. Apology accepted.

Appreciate it, fam.

Blake
04-08-2016, 01:33 PM
No, it was teachers, which I think is repulsive.

And you do have crazy pols that think kids packing is something to promote.

Meet Michelle Fiore, Nevada St rep running for congress:


http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2456225.1449330972!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/fiore6n-1-web.jpg

Look at cute little 6 year old Jake with his P22!

Adorable!

That Christmas card has a warm and inviting feel to it

Splits
04-08-2016, 01:40 PM
That's weird that they would want elementary school kids packing.

What do you think of Michele's xmas card with her 6yr old packing, btw? That qualifies as "elementary school kids"

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2456225.1449330972!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/fiore6n-1-web.jpg

Spurminator
04-08-2016, 02:57 PM
Second from the right ain't bad from the neck down tho.

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 03:31 PM
I'm OK with trained teachers packing.

Blake
04-08-2016, 03:41 PM
I'm OK with trained teachers packing.

In what situation would they use the gun

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 03:44 PM
In what situation would they use the gun

Sandy Hook certainly comes to mind.

Splits
04-08-2016, 03:45 PM
I'm OK with trained teachers packing.

Yes, Molly, straight outta UofXXX should need to be a trained firearm professional to take down the shooter in the 1/20,000,000 chance her classroom gets hit up. I'm sure that will reduce kids getting gunned down.

Principal: Here Molly, put this Glock in your classroom safe and make sure to have it loaded without one in the chamber and with the lock enabled and also make sure none of your kids see the code. Your college did train you in gun safety right?

Molly: Umm, yes! Now I'm gonna teach these kids to read. Where is the safe and what is the code?

Fucking moron.

Splits
04-08-2016, 03:47 PM
Sandy Hook certainly comes to mind.

Yes. Put a gun in every one of America's 20,000,000 classrooms. What could go wrong?

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 03:50 PM
Yes. Put a gun in every one of America's 20,000,000 classrooms. What could go wrong?

who said every classroom, dumbfuck?

Splits
04-08-2016, 03:51 PM
I'm OK with trained teachers packing.


who said every classroom, dumbfuck?

^This dumb fuck.

And this guy had a murder machine but didn't want to pull it because he knew LE was on the way and didn't want to get shot himself

:cry good guy with a gun :cry


But at Umpqua Community College, we had an example of at least one "good guy with a gun" present on campus. John Parker Jr., a military veteran and UCC student, explains that while he ran toward the scene, pulling his gun could have resulted in even more deaths -- including his own

bK-Ht57AdBA

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 04:11 PM
We get it puta.
guns are bad.
boohoo

Splits
04-08-2016, 04:20 PM
Don't shoot your dick off!

Blake
04-08-2016, 04:43 PM
Sandy Hook certainly comes to mind.

What are the odds of that happening in the average school? .000001% would be my approximate guess

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 04:51 PM
What are the odds of that happening in the average school? .000001% would be my approximate guess

So why do anti gun advocates keep talking about Sandy Hook if it's so incredibly rare?

Blake
04-08-2016, 06:22 PM
So why do anti gun advocates keep talking about Sandy Hook if it's so incredibly rare?

They're referencing the high capacity gun (s). He got off 154 shots in 5 minutes and it could easily have been more.

But hey, instead of getting rid of the high capacity gun, let's add more guns just in case something that has an incredibly small chance of happening actually happens.

CosmicCowboy
04-08-2016, 06:30 PM
They're referencing the high capacity gun (s). He got off 154 shots in 5 minutes and it could easily have been more.

But hey, instead of getting rid of the high capacity gun, let's add more guns just in case something that has an incredibly small chance of happening actually happens.

exactly

so why ban semi automatic weapons from all law abiding citizens on that incredibly small chance?

shit happens

bad people happen

Blake
04-08-2016, 08:42 PM
exactly

so why ban semi automatic weapons from all law abiding citizens on that incredibly small chance?

shit happens

bad people happen

Because they kill a lot of people very quickly. In any number of different places.

But that's a different goalpost. Why add guns to classrooms? To protect against what exactly? A gunman with an incredibly low chance of ever showing up?

You're putting a loaded weapon in a confined room full of kids. That makes no sense for a lot of reasons.

TheSanityAnnex
04-08-2016, 08:58 PM
They're referencing the high capacity gun (s). He got off 154 shots in 5 minutes and it could easily have been more.

But hey, instead of getting rid of the high capacity gun, let's add more guns just in case something that has an incredibly small chance of happening actually happens.
30 round magazines are standard capacity FYI.

TheSanityAnnex
04-08-2016, 09:00 PM
Because they kill a lot of people very quickly. In any number of different places.

But that's a different goalpost. Why add guns to classrooms? To protect against what exactly? A gunman with an incredibly low chance of ever showing up?

You're putting a loaded weapon in a confined room full of kids. That makes no sense for a lot of reasons.
Are you okay with an armed police officer on a campus full of kids?

Blake
04-08-2016, 09:41 PM
30 round magazines are standard capacity FYI.

Standard for what?

Blake
04-08-2016, 09:45 PM
Are you okay with an armed police officer on a campus full of kids?

An armed peace officer patrolling the school, in and out whose sole purpose is security? Of course.

Much better than some on edge stressed out teacher

TheSanityAnnex
04-08-2016, 10:07 PM
An armed peace officer patrolling the school, in and out whose sole purpose is security? Of course.

Much better than some on edge stressed out teacher
lol
X-WJMoxMfm4

TheSanityAnnex
04-08-2016, 10:09 PM
Standard for what?

The capacity. Anything less is limited (20, 10, 5) anything more is high (50,100)

Blake
04-08-2016, 11:05 PM
30 round magazines are standard capacity FYI.

http://www.cabelas.com/product/remington-174-model-597-22-lr-high-capacity-magazines/708765.uts?destination=%2Fcategory%2FGun-Magazines%2F104442480.uts&No=0

Cabelas says 30 rounds is high capacity

TheSanityAnnex
04-09-2016, 02:46 PM
http://www.cabelas.com/product/remington-174-model-597-22-lr-high-capacity-magazines/708765.uts?destination=%2Fcategory%2FGun-Magazines%2F104442480.uts&No=0

Cabelas says 30 rounds is high capacity
You linked to a .22 magazine at Cabelas. Lanza used an AR15 (.223/5.56) at Sandy Hook, standard capacity magazine for that is 30 rounds.

CosmicCowboy
04-09-2016, 03:00 PM
TSA is correct that the standard US military magazine is 30 rounds.

Blake
04-09-2016, 05:15 PM
TSA is correct that the standard US military magazine is 30 rounds.

It's always hilarious when you butt in as an authority of some kind.

Blake
04-09-2016, 05:17 PM
"....The term high capacity ammunition magazines (sometimes called large capacity magazines or high capacity ammunition feeding devices) generally refers to gun magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. But statutory definitions vary. A 1994 congressional ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition expired in 2004 and was not renewed. Consequently, high capacity ammunition magazines are legal unless banned by state or local governments. Connecticut does not regulate the magazines.

Six states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) currently ban or restrict large capacity magazines. Maryland defines a “large capacity magazine” as a magazine capable of accepting more than 20 rounds.*New Jersey defines it as one capable of accepting more than 15 rounds, and California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, and D.C. define it as a magazine capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. (On January 15, 2013, the NY Legislature amended its law. Beginning March 16, the law defines high capacity magazines as magazines capable of firing more than seven rounds..........."

https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-R-0039.htm

Blake
04-09-2016, 06:44 PM
https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=17&t=492379

Seems like your favoritewebsite said it

TheSanityAnnex
04-09-2016, 06:47 PM
"....The term high capacity ammunition magazines (sometimes called large capacity magazines or high capacity ammunition feeding devices) generally refers to gun magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. But statutory definitions vary. A 1994 congressional ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition expired in 2004 and was not renewed. Consequently, high capacity ammunition magazines are legal unless banned by state or local governments. Connecticut does not regulate the magazines.

Six states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) currently ban or restrict large capacity magazines. Maryland defines a “large capacity magazine” as a magazine capable of accepting more than 20 rounds.*New Jersey defines it as one capable of accepting more than 15 rounds, and California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, and D.C. define it as a magazine capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. (On January 15, 2013, the NY Legislature amended its law. Beginning March 16, the law defines high capacity magazines as magazines capable of firing more than seven rounds..........."

https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-R-0039.htm

What part of "standard capacity for the firearm Adam Lanza used" are you having trouble comprehending?

TheSanityAnnex
04-09-2016, 06:50 PM
https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=17&t=492379

Seems like your favoritewebsite said it
What does California's definition of magazine capacity have to do with anything? Are California's 10 round magazines called standard or limited? Why would California make a law to define something already considered standard?

Blake
04-09-2016, 09:10 PM
What part of "standard capacity for the firearm Adam Lanza used" are you having trouble comprehending?

Everyone seems to be calling more than 10 rounds high capacity

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lawmakers-introduce-measure-ban-high-capacity-magazines-0

Lanza used ar 15 with 30 round capacity.

No idea where you're getting "standard capacity" from unless it's military language

Blake
04-09-2016, 09:46 PM
"*U.S.*+

Gun sales drive demand for high capacity magazines

February 24

*

LAS VEGAS

America's zeal for guns is driving sales of one of the industry's most controversial accessories: high capacity magazines.

High capacity magazines that carry 10 or more rounds, have been banned in eight states. But sales are strong where they're still legal, fueled by fears that they'll soon be subject to tighter regulations.

The popularity of the magazines prompted Jarret Mock to launch the startup TorkMag last year in Fort Myers, Florida. His startup makesmagazines that hold 35 or 50 rounds. The magazines, which sell for $22 or $40,*are for AR-15s.
....

http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/24/smallbusiness/gun-sales-high-capacity-magazines/

TheSanityAnnex
04-09-2016, 09:50 PM
Everyone seems to be calling more than 10 rounds high capacity

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lawmakers-introduce-measure-ban-high-capacity-magazines-0

Lanza used ar 15 with 30 round capacity.

No idea where you're getting "standard capacity" from unless it's military language
I always look to the MSM when trying to find proper gun terminology :lol "clips"

Blake
04-09-2016, 09:51 PM
I'm starting to get it....gun strokers want to make sure it's called "standard capacity" so that it doesn't sound so evil.

TheSanityAnnex
04-10-2016, 11:57 AM
I'm starting to get it....gun strokers want to make sure it's called "standard capacity" so that it doesn't sound so evil.
It's called standard capacity because it's the standard capacity. Ill informed people like yourself and the MSM call them high capacity in an attempt to make them sound evil. Same way you refer to the modern sporting rifle AR15 as an assault rifle even though less than 1% of them are used in firearm homicides.

Blake
04-10-2016, 12:53 PM
It's called standard capacity because it's the standard capacity. Ill informed people like yourself and the MSM call them high capacity in an attempt to make them sound evil. Same way you refer to the modern sporting rifle AR15 as an assault rifle even though less than 1% of them are used in firearm homicides.

Yeah, I get it already. You and other gun fuckers want to make sure that everyone knows it's called standard capacity. I even found a T shirt for sale on amazon saying that.

30 round standard capacity is a high capacity. That's the point.

Blake
04-10-2016, 12:56 PM
http://www.endoapparel.com/wp-content/themes/thesis_18/custom/images/standard-capacity-30-rounds-shirt/Standard-Capacity-30-Rounds-TriBlack-Shirt-Full-Resolution.jpg

muh gun

TheSanityAnnex
04-10-2016, 01:54 PM
Yeah, I get it already. You and other gun fuckers want to make sure that everyone knows it's called standard capacity. I even found a T shirt for sale on amazon saying that.

30 round standard capacity is a high capacity. That's the point.
If you call a 30 round mag high capacity, what capacity do you call 100 round mag?

Blake
04-10-2016, 01:59 PM
If you call a 30 round mag high capacity, what capacity do you call 100 round mag?

High.

Ask me about a 1000 round capacity

Blake
04-10-2016, 02:01 PM
I'm OK with trained teachers packing.

djHVsAfqbBw

She needed a gun here, imo

TheSanityAnnex
04-10-2016, 03:39 PM
High.

Ask me about a 1000 round capacity
Doesn't exist.

How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?

Blake
04-10-2016, 04:41 PM
Doesn't exist.

How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?

A high amount.

CosmicCowboy
04-10-2016, 05:26 PM
It's always hilarious when you butt in as an authority of some kind.

It's always hilarious when your ignorance is totally exposed.

TheSanityAnnex
04-10-2016, 05:49 PM
A high amount.

I asked for a number. How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?

Blake
04-10-2016, 06:07 PM
It's always hilarious when your ignorance is totally exposed.

Meh, yours is funnier.

Blake
04-10-2016, 06:08 PM
I asked for a number. How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?

Looks like 30.

Who labels it as "standard"?

Blake
04-10-2016, 06:18 PM
What's standard capacity for a B52 bomber