Is there any doubt that Chris Paul is better than Russell Westbrook?

[JohnnyMax]

Look At The Difference In Efficiency

Russell Westbrook (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/westbru01.html)

http://oi64.tinypic.com/wtsh28.jpg

VS San Antonio (2016 Playoffs) (http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/2016-nba-western-conference-semifinals-thunder-vs-spurs.html)

http://oi64.tinypic.com/iensph.jpg

Chris Paul (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/p/paulch01.html)

http://oi64.tinypic.com/30m5ye8.jpg

VS San Antonio (2015 Playoffs) (http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/2015-nba-western-conference-first-round-spurs-vs-clippers.html)

http://oi67.tinypic.com/5v8uwk.jpg

[ducks]

Tp has more titles then they do combine

Chris Paul has done what ?
Both beat the Spurs once in the playoffs however cp3 when tp was injured

[apalisoc_9]

Paul is a top 2 PG in the last 15 years. Probably the best.

[Kawhitstorm]

The thing is that WestBrick OWNS Choke P3:

He murdered him during their last meeting this season & also in the 2014 playoffs.

wO6UqQmBOlE

saVh4aCRfW4

[TheGreatYacht]

Parker better than both

[dg7md]

They're totally different types of players, so I don't know if you can compare them. Paul is probably the best pass-first PG since Stockton, whereas Westbrook is a scorer. He's fearless and while it loses a lot of games for you, it wins just as many more.

That being said, in today's NBA I think having a Westbrook is a primary offensive player is more valuable to a franchise. Paul would be better on the Thunder with Durant as the go-to guy though.

[BillMc]

Parker better than both

He'll certainly go down in history as more accomplished than both.

[Gagnrath]

Westbrook is the better athlete, Paul is better as a basketball player. The issue is that Westbrook does seem like he will ever get his head right.