Buddy Heild?

[coachmac87]

Would y'all be interested trading up for him? Not sure where he's projected to go but if he falls out of top 10 is he worth a chance of trading up for??

[Obi Juan Kenobi]

Would love to have him but I doubt he gets anywhere close to us even with a trade up considering the lack of legitimate tradeable resources the team currently has...

[tholdren]

ab so lute ly

[coachmac87]

Trade Parker to Minnesota if he falls to to them tbh

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

He could go anywhere from 3-7? Denver and Boston both have too many picks in this draft, and picks in the 3-7 range, while Minnesota could do with a vet like TP and have #5. It's possible but, like it or not, I just don't see Pop and RC trading Tony, unless he asks for it. It's just not what they do.

[cd98]

Tony isn't getting you a top 5 lottery pick. The market for Parker is a title contender needing a veteran point guard. Bad teams aren't going to give up a young prospect for a down side of prime player. Parker's highest value was like three years ago. I don't think there are many options to trade him. I actually think Patty Mills is the guard to trade.

[Dro210]

Tony isn't getting you a top 5 lottery pick. The market for Parker is a title contender needing a veteran point guard. Bad teams aren't going to give up a young prospect for a down side of prime player. Parker's highest value was like three years ago. I don't think there are many options to trade him. I actually think Patty Mills is the guard to trade.

Move Mills for an early to mid 2nd rounder, and take GPII

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

Tony isn't getting you a top 5 lottery pick. The market for Parker is a title contender needing a veteran point guard. Bad teams aren't going to give up a young prospect for a down side of prime player. Parker's highest value was like three years ago. I don't think there are many options to trade him. I actually think Patty Mills is the guard to trade.

Mills and 1st for MCW is intriguing to me. If Chip could help him fix his shot he could be a next gen PG - long, athletic, tenacious defender. All he needs to do is slash, get the ball to LMA and Kawhi, and make his open shots.

[TXstbobcat]

The only way the Spurs could get a top 10 lottery pick for Parker is to find the delorean with the flux capacitor and travel back in time a few years.

[TheGreatYacht]

He's a mouth breather like Raymond. No

[cd98]

Mills and 1st for MCW is intriguing to me. If Chip could help him fix his shot he could be a next gen PG - long, athletic, tenacious defender. All he needs to do is slash, get the ball to LMA and Kawhi, and make his open shots.

MCW is available. But I go for Conley first. If you get him, just have Parker take Manu's spot as the primary playmaker and scorer in the second unit. Parker can be effective against other teams' benches. But you have to trade Patty and go get a 2/3 that has three point range. I'd bet they could get Belineli...he flopped with the Kings.

[TheGreatYacht]

Would take him over another typical euro bust though

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

MCW is available. But I go for Conley first. If you get him, just have Parker take Manu's spot as the primary playmaker and scorer in the second unit. Parker can be effective against other teams' benches. But you have to trade Patty and go get a 2/3 that has three point range. I'd bet they could get Belineli...he flopped with the Kings.

MCW - 2.4mil
Conley - max

I like Conley, but he is a costly long-shot to come here. MCW fits the new NBA style of long athletes and looks like a diamond in the rough to me given that we have a miracle-working shooting guru in Chip.

[Silver&Black]

We're getting some kid from overseas that we've never even heard of. He might wear a Spurs uniform one day....then again he might not.

We all know what's going to happen.

[Kawhitstorm]

Buddy is going to be the black JJ ReDick & will be drafted too high.

[cjw]

If you're going to be JJ Redick, you deserve to be picked 3rd in this draft. That's not too high.

MCW lacks the one most important skill in the NBA - shooting. That's kind of a big issue. For free I'd grab him but he'll cost at least Mills and the first.

[SD126]

Even if he were available, expect another draft and stash at #29.

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

If you're going to be JJ Redick, you deserve to be picked 3rd in this draft. That's not too high.

MCW lacks the one most important skill in the NBA - shooting. That's kind of a big issue. For free I'd grab him but he'll cost at least Mills and the first.

Look what Chip achieved with Kawhi, Tony, etc. That's pivotal to the plan, and worth a shot when other options are poor/non-existent.

All he has to become is an average shooter and it works because we have Kawhi, Danny and LMA to shoot.

[Mal]

Bonner + Diaw + Mills + 1st - do it RC

[kobyz]

He is a lock for number 3 pick, brandon roy type talent...

[r0drig0lac]

Celtics should take Hield, the guy is a monster

[Spurs9]

Celtics should take Hield, the guy is a monster
Still unreal that the Celtics have the 3rd and all those picks from Celtics trade.

[r0drig0lac]

Still unreal that the Celtics have the 3rd and all those picks from Celtics trade.

It seems that King did not want to make the switch, but Prok gave the final word

[elbamba]

The only players on the Spurs that will net them a lottery pick would be Aldridge and Kawhi. Neither of those players are getting traded until the Spurs decide to blow everything up, which is unlikely considering the fact that they are still a threat to reach the WCF next season even without Duncan and Manu.

Green, Diaw, and Mills could be the only real movable assets and I am being generous with Diaw. I don't know why anyone would take him after his stint with the Bobcats and this past season.

[Spurs9]

The only players on the Spurs that will net them a lottery pick would be Aldridge and Kawhi. Neither of those players are getting traded until the Spurs decide to blow everything up, which is unlikely considering the fact that they are still a threat to reach the WCF next season even without Duncan and Manu.

Green, Diaw, and Mills could be the only real movable assets and I am being generous with Diaw. I don't know why anyone would take him after his stint with the Bobcats and this past season.

Theres plenty of teams who would overpay in a trade for any 3 of those players tbh Especially Green and Mills

[sasaint]

The only players on the Spurs that will net them a lottery pick would be Aldridge and Kawhi. Neither of those players are getting traded until the Spurs decide to blow everything up, which is unlikely considering the fact that they are still a threat to reach the WCF next season even without Duncan and Manu.

Green, Diaw, and Mills could be the only real movable assets and I am being generous with Diaw. I don't know why anyone would take him after his stint with the Bobcats and this past season.

I believe Diaw will have the opportunity to go on permanent safari this off season. Mid-season I stated that we could not afford to allocate a roster spot or cap space to a coaster. I doubt we would have gotten much of anything in exchange for Diaw last off-season. Nobody would take him off our hands this coming off-season. Our tradeable assets are Anderson, Green, Mills and Parker. It is relatively certain that Pop will not trade Tony. (Hopefully, he can become a good sixth man for the next couple of seasons.) So, Anderson, Green and Mills are really our only good trade pieces. Big problem is - aside from Kawhi - Green and Mills are our only probable returning three-point shooters (such as they are). Green showed signs of life during our briefer-than-expected playoff run. Unless we can get a serious upgrade, I expect Green to remain a Spur. So, realistically that leaves only Anderson and Mills as moveable assets. A number of ST posters continue to have hopes for Anderson's development, and I believe there are some teams who would like to obtain him for an asset we would value. Mills, less so. Consistent with our historic MO, I do not expect the Spurs to make any significant trades. I expect us to retool with mid-level FAs, possibly a foreign "stash" and our draft pick - or perhaps a higher pick we acquire with our own and, say, Anderson.

[elbamba]

I would not get too worked up over Green's shooting this year. I think the fact that Aldridge and Duncan want to stay in the same general spots on offense, limited the looks Green could get. I think that next year he shoots better than 45% from three.

[Kawhitstorm]

If you're going to be JJ Redick, you deserve to be picked 3rd in this draft. That's not too high.

MCW lacks the one most important skill in the NBA - shooting. That's kind of a big issue. For free I'd grab him but he'll cost at least Mills and the first.

There is no way anyone is giving up a rotation player AND a 1st rd for MCW.:lol

Evan Turner was essentially traded for a 2nd rd pick as Danny Granger was a salary dump.

[DMC]

Buddy will go 3 or 4. He won't be around for us.

[DMC]

Bonner + Diaw + Mills + 1st - do it RC
lol you couldn't get a nosebleed ticket for the 1st two.

[Mal]

lol you couldn't get a nosebleed ticket for the 1st two.

I`d get 3rd pick to choose Buddy Hield, but RC probably won`t trade Bonner -.-

[DMC]

I`d get 3rd pick to choose Buddy Hield, but RC probably won`t trade Bonner -.-
You think you could get a 3rd overall pick for Bonner + Diaw, really? Expiring contracts? Can't be the basketball prowess (Diaw is good but he's gone already mentally).

[Mal]

You think you could get a 3rd overall pick for Bonner + Diaw, really? Expiring contracts? Can't be the basketball prowess (Diaw is good but he's gone already mentally).

You can`t recognize sarcasm, even it`s struct you twice

[DMC]

You can`t recognize sarcasm, even it`s struct you twice
This is upstairs. Shitty takes are the norm so you can't assume anything is sarcasm.

[T Park]

He's a mouth breather like Raymond. No



Yeah wouldn't want any Draymond Green level players.....

[NameLess Scrub]

Trade Parker to Minnesota if he falls to to them tbh


He could go anywhere from 3-7? Denver and Boston both have too many picks in this draft, and picks in the 3-7 range, while Minnesota could do with a vet like TP and have #5. It's possible but, like it or not, I just don't see Pop and RC trading Tony, unless he asks for it. It's just not what they do.


Tony isn't getting you a top 5 lottery pick. The market for Parker is a title contender needing a veteran point guard. Bad teams aren't going to give up a young prospect for a down side of prime player. Parker's highest value was like three years ago. I don't think there are many options to trade him. I actually think Patty Mills is the guard to trade.

Spurs will never... eveeeer.. trade Tony Parker

[cjw]

There is no way anyone is giving up a rotation player AND a 1st rd for MCW.:lol

Evan Turner was essentially traded for a 2nd rd pick as Danny Granger was a salary dump.

The first is the 29th pick. Let's not kid ourselves that it's worth much and Mills only has one year till FA.

[Kawhitstorm]

The first is the 29th pick. Let's not kid ourselves that it's worth much and Mills only has one year till FA.

Might as well keep Kyle & replace Patty w/ MCW when the BOTH become FAs next summer. That's how the Celtics picked up Turner.

[DMC]

I think we should just trade Patty for Porzingod and try to bring in Anthony Davis and Kevin Durant. We could go big like no one in the league. Then we could get Lillard, Kryie and Curry and go small when we needed to. We could bring Klay off the bench along with The 6ers 1st overall pick (he's a rookie for Christ's sake) and of course Tony would be our starting PG.