PDA

View Full Version : NBA: This is a game 2 type series tbh...



Thebesteva
06-02-2016, 10:48 PM
Whoever wins game 2 has about a 90% chance of winning the series...good win by GSW but not impressed yet

Thread
06-02-2016, 10:50 PM
Whoever wins game 2 has about a 90% chance of winning the series...good win by GSW but not impressed yet

Waited a year to get Love & Irving back to absolutely no end.

baseline bum
06-02-2016, 11:03 PM
If Golden State wins Game 2 they have a 100% chance of winning the series. If Cleveland wins Game 2 they have a 0% chance of winning the series.

Thebesteva
06-02-2016, 11:11 PM
If Golden State wins Game 2 they have a 100% chance of winning the series. If Cleveland wins Game 2 they have a 0% chance of winning the series.

Would u bet ur life on it? As James Worthy once said...it was way easier to lose a game by 20 than 2...those 2-6 point losses haunt u for days. Cleveland will be ready for game 2 tbh

Thread
06-02-2016, 11:13 PM
Would u bet ur life on it? As James Worthy once said...it was way easier to lose a game by 20 than 2...those 2-6 point losses haunt u for days. Cleveland will be ready for game 2 tbh

Frankly, eve, I don't believe Cleveland knows how to get/be ready.

Thebesteva
06-02-2016, 11:14 PM
Frankly, eve, I don't believe Cleveland knows how to get/be ready.

Lebron is so good he carries so much damn weight that when push comes to shove the team is lost in pivotal moments tbh...thats what lebron fans dont get. When Shaq had a bad game he would let Kobe take over, when Magic had a bad game he would let Pippen+Kukoc take over...when Lebron has a bad game the entire team panics and loses. I dont think he had a bad game today but nothing special.

Relevancy
06-02-2016, 11:14 PM
the thing about this loss was that cleveland got beat by a bunch of bench players, that's embarassing

Thread
06-02-2016, 11:15 PM
Lebron is so good he carries so much damn weight that when push comes to shove the team is lost in pivotal moments tbh...thats what lebron fans dont get. When Shaq had a bad game he would let Kobe take over, when Magic had a bad game he would let Pippen+Kukoc take over...when Lebron has a bad game the entire team panics and loses. I dont think he had a bad game today but nothing special.

Good things.

Bynumite
06-02-2016, 11:20 PM
http://cdn.yourepeat.com/media/gif/000/374/581/2efefb17061b758f99c024da0e8d59c5.gif

Thebesteva
06-02-2016, 11:24 PM
the thing about this loss was that cleveland got beat by a bunch of bench players, that's embarassing

Exactly. If I told you that Curry +Klay had 20 points combined you wouldnt bet $1 on a GSW warrior victory by double digits. The problem is game 2 will be the opposite imho...the bench will not score much and curry and klay will show up.

DMC
06-02-2016, 11:27 PM
Whoever wins game 2 has about a 90% chance of winning the series...good win by GSW but not impressed yet

You pulled this right out of your asshole along with that M.D.

Thebesteva
06-02-2016, 11:27 PM
You pulled this right out of your asshole along with that M.D.

Stop picking on me bro :'(

DMC
06-02-2016, 11:28 PM
Lebron is so good he carries so much damn weight that when push comes to shove the team is lost in pivotal moments tbh...thats what lebron fans dont get. When Shaq had a bad game he would let Kobe take over, when Magic had a bad game he would let Pippen+Kukoc take over...when Lebron has a bad game the entire team panics and loses. I dont think he had a bad game today but nothing special.
lol Shaq's bad games were because Kobe "took over".

Revisionist Lakers fans ..

baseline bum
06-02-2016, 11:32 PM
Would u bet ur life on it? As James Worthy once said...it was way easier to lose a game by 20 than 2...those 2-6 point losses haunt u for days. Cleveland will be ready for game 2 tbh

Why would I bet my life on a fucking basketball game?

InRareForm
06-03-2016, 12:30 AM
Warriors -6 was free money

Otaku
06-03-2016, 12:38 AM
This is a sweep type of series tbh...

Thebesteva
06-03-2016, 01:26 AM
Why would I bet my life on a fucking basketball game?

Why would u? i dunno u sick fuck

ambchang
06-03-2016, 08:30 AM
Lebron is so good he carries so much damn weight that when push comes to shove the team is lost in pivotal moments tbh...thats what lebron fans dont get. When Shaq had a bad game he would let Kobe take over, when Magic had a bad game he would let Pippen+Kukoc take over...when Lebron has a bad game the entire team panics and loses. I dont think he had a bad game today but nothing special.


You got a few things mixed up:
1) Shaq had bad games because Kobe tries to take over
2) You meant Jordan instead of Magic
3) It speaks to how bad Lebron's teammates are, which was the doing of his own ghost GMing raising its ugly head.

Thread
06-03-2016, 09:17 AM
lol Shaq's bad games were because Kobe "took over".

Revisionist Lakers fans ..

& if Kobe don't "took over" in Portland, '00, I'm light a triple & 2 doubles and Daddy is hangin' next to Sterling.

Killakobe81
06-03-2016, 09:59 AM
Whoever wins game 2 has about a 90% chance of winning the series...good win by GSW but not impressed yet

Even if cavs win game 2 their chances of winning the series is 50-50 at best. Sure, the Dubs did not look like a 73 win team but that was the most a bench has scored in a Finals game since tge Pistons in 1989 ...so that is a bad sign for Cleveland.
LeBron, Love and Kyrie all put up numbers bit most of that was in iso situations with limited ball movement. They will not beat the Dubs that way ...

Lol both mikes on espn picking believeland

DMC
06-03-2016, 09:59 AM
& if Kobe don't "took over" in Portland, '00, I'm light a triple & 2 doubles and Daddy is hangin' next to Sterling.
Los Angeles Lakers (4-3) Glossary · SHARE · Embed · CSV · Export · PRE · LINK (http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/2000-nba-western-conference-finals-trail-blazers-vs-lakers.html#LAL::none) · ?




Totals
Shooting
Per Game


Rk
Player
Age
G
GS
MP
FG
FGA
3P
3PA
FT
FTA
ORB
DRB
TRB
AST
STL
BLK
TOV
PF
PTS
FG%
3P%
FT%
MP
PTS
TRB
AST
STL
BLK


1
Shaquille O'Neal (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/o/onealsh01.html)
27
7
7
320
65
121
0
0
51
99
26
61
87
30
1
13
19
18
181
.537

.515
45.7
25.9
12.4
4.3
0.1
1.9


2
Kobe Bryant (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/bryanko01.html)
21
7
7
302
47
107
12
23
37
51
5
29
34
41
11
15
20
34
143
.439
.522
.725
43.1
20.4
4.9
5.9
1.6
2.1


3
Glen Rice (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/ricegl01.html)
32
7
7
229
28
62
8
23
13
16
2
24
26
14
4
0
12
15
77
.452
.348
.813
32.7
11.0
3.7
2.0
0.6
0.0


4
Ron Harper (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/harpero01.html)
36
7
7
191
29
62
3
15
14
19
8
19
27
15
4
6
8
25
75
.468
.200
.737
27.3
10.7
3.9
2.1
0.6
0.9


5
Robert Horry (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/horryro01.html)
29
7
0
189
17
51
5
24
13
18
14
24
38
22
5
6
11
28
52
.333
.208
.722
27.0
7.4
5.4
3.1
0.7
0.9


6
Brian Shaw (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/shawbr01.html)
33
6
0
85
14
24
11
18
2
4
0
8
8
13
5
2
5
18
41
.583
.611
.500
14.2
6.8
1.3
2.2
0.8
0.3


7
Derek Fisher (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/fishede01.html)
25
7
0
102
10
23
4
11
7
8
1
8
9
8
2
0
2
5
31
.435
.364
.875
14.6
4.4
1.3
1.1
0.3
0.0


8
Rick Fox (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/f/foxri01.html)
30
7
0
111
10
24
6
16
0
0
1
6
7
12
2
0
6
25
26
.417
.375

15.9
3.7
1.0
1.7
0.3
0.0


9
A.C. Green (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/greenac01.html)
36
7
7
123
10
20
0
0
3
6
6
21
27
3
3
0
3
16
23
.500

.500
17.6
3.3
3.9
0.4
0.4
0.0


10
Travis Knight (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/k/knightr01.html)
25
3
0
8
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
5
2
1.000


2.7
0.7
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0


11
Devean George (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/georgde01.html)
22
1
0
6
0
3
0
3
1
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
1
.000
.000
.500
6.0
1.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0


12
John Salley (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/sallejo01.html)
35
6
0
14
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
.000

.000
2.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5



Team Totals

7

1680
231
499
49
133
141
225
64
202
266
158
37
45
88
192
652
.463
.368
.627
240.0
93.1
38.0
22.6
5.3
6.4


Please

Fabbs
06-03-2016, 10:02 AM
Did Delas nutter have anything to do with Goldens take off in the 4th?

InRareForm
06-03-2016, 10:10 AM
I was joking with my buddies that barbosa will make all these shots this game.... and sure enough he did. It's my fault

UNT Eagles 2016
06-03-2016, 10:47 AM
Fun fact: the winner of game 2 has lost 4 of the last 6 NBA Finals

TampaDude
06-03-2016, 10:56 AM
This is a sweep type of series tbh...

^ this, tbh

spursistan
06-03-2016, 06:40 PM
How do you lose a Finals game when Curry/Klay combine for measly 20 fuckin' points ? :lol

Grim business for the Cavs..this series won't go beyond 5 games if GSW goes up 2-0..

140
06-03-2016, 07:32 PM
Fun fact: the winner of game 2 has lost 4 of the last 6 NBA Finals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkcQnwynqOc:hat

SpursDynasty
06-03-2016, 10:25 PM
The Cavs don't deserve to win any games if they allow Shaun Livingston to score 20. I'm happy for Livingston's comeback from what happened in 2007 and his journey through 9 teams including the D League all the way to where he's at now, but he has no business scoring 20 points in an NBA Finals game.

Thread
06-04-2016, 02:51 AM
The Cavs don't deserve to win any games if they allow Shaun Livingston to score 20. I'm happy for Livingston's comeback from what happened in 2007 and his journey through 9 teams including the D League all the way to where he's at now, but he has no business scoring 20 points in an NBA Finals game.

Why, because Media said it would be Love & Irving who would mark the spot? (Saying) & actually (doing) are world's apart. But, Media never gives a good shit about that difference. Obviously neither does Love & Irving. They believed Media as well.

UNT Eagles 2016
06-04-2016, 01:08 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkcQnwynqOc:hat
Wade should have had 3 ft's to win the game, really wanted the Heatles to win that year, but it's whatever.

.G.
06-04-2016, 03:46 PM
Mang, just get this fucking boring ass "series" over with!

I'm ready to drank dat free agency koolaid up in dis bitch, yo!

spursistan
06-05-2016, 03:35 PM
2007 aside, Lebron has split the first two games in all his Finals apperances..I expect a better effort/focus from Cavs..this game is probably their only shot at keeping a 40-45 % chance of winning this series..Don't see them winning 4 straights vs GSW or a Game 7 in Oracle..

TD 21
06-05-2016, 03:50 PM
2007 aside, Lebron has split the first two games in all his Finals apperances..I expect a better effort/focus from Cavs..this game is probably their only shot at keeping a 40-45 % chance of winning this series..Don't see them winning 4 straights vs GSW or a Game 7 in Oracle..

It's already over.

As virtually always, in the NBA, when you're playing an elite team, without home court, you need to win game 1 and all three home games.

Even if they win tonight, they'd have to win 3 straight to hold serve at home, which isn't happening.

spursistan
06-05-2016, 03:57 PM
It's already over.

As virtually always, in the NBA, when you're playing an elite team, without home court, you need to win game 1 and all three home games.

Even if they win tonight, they'd have to win 3 straight to hold serve at home, which isn't happening.

As a basketball fan, it is kind of wishful thinking on my part so we can get a competitive series :lol..But deep down, you know the title was a wrap for Warriors once OKC went into meltdown mode the last 5 minutes of Game 6..those type of experiences are emboldening for championships/elite teams; they rarely, if ever, look back once they achieve those type of narrow escapes..

AlexJones
06-05-2016, 03:59 PM
As a basketball fan, it is kind of wishful thinking on my part so we can get a competitive series :lol..But deep down, you know the title was a wrap for Warriors once OKC went into meltdown mode the last 5 minutes of Game 6..those type of experiences are emboldening for championships/elite teams; they rarely, if ever, look back once they achieve those type of narrow escapes..

Just like how the elite Spurs in 06 didn't have to look back once they came back down 20 in game 7 to lead late, right? My god stop posting already.

spursistan
06-05-2016, 04:07 PM
Just like how the elite Spurs in 06 didn't have to look back once they came back down 20 in game 7 to lead late, right? My god stop posting already.
Guess, I wrote "rarely", too..not to mention your Warriors are two notches above that Spurs team...

TD 21
06-05-2016, 05:00 PM
As a basketball fan, it is kind of wishful thinking on my part so we can get a competitive series :lol..But deep down, you know the title was a wrap for Warriors once OKC went into meltdown mode the last 5 minutes of Game 6..those type of experiences are emboldening for championships/elite teams; they rarely, if ever, look back once they achieve those type of narrow escapes..

:tu