Green or Parker to Boston for their 3rd overall pick? (Assuming we can get Durant)

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Would both teams do it? Assume we give our 1st to them as well plus the rights to one or two of our foreign stashers we likely won't have the room for.

[Chinook]

I'd say to keep trade ideas to the trade thread in the TT, but nope. Keep that outta there. The Spurs have nothing outside Leonard and LMA that could get the third-overall pick. But 16 might be in play...

[Maddog]

Would both teams do it? Assume we give our 1st to them as well plus the rights to one or two of our foreign stashers we likely won't have the room for.

I'm speechless.
Why didn't I think of this scenario...

Boston is probably hopping against hope we get Durant to pull off this trade..

[Kawhitstorm]

I'm pretty sure what Boston needs is another guard.:lol

The only team that could DEFINITELY use Porker are the Jazz & Danny isn't going anywhere b/c Santa Clause isn't coming to town.

[Kawhitstorm]

I'd say to keep trade ideas to the trade thread in the TT, but nope. Keep that outta there. The Spurs have nothing outside Leonard and LMA that could get the third-overall pick. But 16 might be in play...

Danny could be used to net a late lottery guy ala G. Hill but Porker might actually cost a 2nd rd pick.:lol

[SpursforSix]

Would both teams do it? Assume we give our 1st to them as well plus the rights to one or two of our foreign stashers we likely won't have the room for.

This makes a lot of sense from the Spurs standpoint. Especially if they land Conley. So the trade of Parker for the 3 would let them go after a young athletic big. So it'd be Conley, Durant, Leonard, Green, and a young big.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

I'd say to keep trade ideas to the trade thread in the TT, but nope. Keep that outta there. The Spurs have nothing outside Leonard and LMA that could get the third-overall pick. But 16 might be in play...
In NBA 2k, I always traded my overpaid baggage with decently-high overall ratings to the worst teams in the league in exchange for their first round pick. Worked every time like a charm. Don't know why it wouldn't work in this case.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

This makes a lot of sense from the Spurs standpoint. Especially if they land Conley. So the trade of Parker for the 3 would let them go after a young athletic big. So it'd be Conley, Durant, Leonard, Green, and a young big.

Who of course we would take with the 3rd pick. I don't know about that Bender guy, could be the next Darko Milicic. Need some tough American meat in there, provided it's someone humble and with the brains to stay out of trouble.


What about LMA?

[SpursforSix]

In NBA 2k, I always traded my overpaid baggage with decently-high overall ratings to the worst teams in the league in exchange for their first round pick. Worked every time like a charm. Don't know why it wouldn't work in this case.

No need to overthink it. It would work. Assuming the Spurs actually think about who they pick up at 3. Not sure if it would require TP or Danny. But at this point, landing Durant, Conley, and the 3...it would be worth it to take a chance and part with either.

[SpursforSix]

Who of course we would take with the 3rd pick. I don't know about that Bender guy, could be the next Darko Milicic. Need some tough American meat in there, provided it's someone humble and with the brains to stay out of trouble.

yeah...I was just looking at that. His write up said he plays either forward and "occasionally" center. I'm not sure I really like that.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

No need to overthink it. It would work. Assuming the Spurs actually think about who they pick up at 3. Not sure if it would require TP or Danny. But at this point, landing Durant, Conley, and the 3...it would be worth it to take a chance and part with either.

Parker, Diaw, LJC, Bertans, our first, our second, Popovich for pick #3. Salaries don't have to match if both teams would still be under the cap.

[SpursforSix]

Parker, Diaw, LJC, Bertans, our first, our second, Popovich for pick #3. Salaries don't have to match if both teams would still be under the cap.

You've lost me. That doesn't make any sense.

[SpursforSix]

I will add that there have been lots of rumors about a Parker for Holiday trade. Which would mean they'd have to give up Green for the #3.

[cd98]

Why would the Celtics want to trade for Parker when they already have Isaiah Thomas. They don't need to point guards on big salaries. And they can't play them together. Just an unworkable trade idea. Celtics are looking to package their trades for stars, not former stars on the downside of their careers. And the Spurs pick is the 29th...that can be toilet paper...most of the people picked that late don't stick. And why would they want any of our foreign stars when they have the 3rd pick, better to gamble on the third pick.

[bklynspursfan]

:sigh:

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

:bang

[kobyz]

OP keep your childish shit out of here...

[SpursforSix]

Why would the Celtics want to trade for Parker when they already have Isaiah Thomas. They don't need to point guards on big salaries. And they can't play them together. Just an unworkable trade idea. Celtics are looking to package their trades for stars, not former stars on the downside of their careers. And the Spurs pick is the 29th...that can be toilet paper...most of the people picked that late don't stick. And why would they want any of our foreign stars when they have the 3rd pick, better to gamble on the third pick.

I think the disappointment of the playoff loss have caused SpursFan to underestimate the value of Parker as a mentor and solid backup PG.

[TXstbobcat]

Nobody on the planet would give up the 3rd overall pick for Parker or Green.

[snickles]

Nobody on the planet would give up the 3rd overall pick for Parker or Green.

/thread

[Hoops Czar]

I'd say to keep trade ideas to the trade thread in the TT, but nope. Keep that outta there. The Spurs have nothing outside Leonard and LMA that could get the third-overall pick. But 16 might be in play...

LMA couldn't net a 3rd overall pick even if his life depended on it. :lol

[K...]

LMA couldn't net a 3rd round pick even if his life depended on it. :lol

Disagree. We saw the number one pick be used for Kevin love. The black Kevin love is also worth a high pick in the right
Scenario

[TheGreatYacht]

:lmao wtf kinda shit is this

[NameLess Scrub]

Tony Parker will neveeer, eeeeeeeeeeeeeeveeeeeeeeeeeeer leave the Spurs.

Thanks.

[SpursforSix]

:lmao wtf kinda shit is this

Fact : Spurs cannot compete with status quo
They need a mix of younger players and top notch free agents.
Bring in Durant and get the #3 pick. If they can also get Conley, then it's icing on the cake.

[Hoops Czar]

Disagree. We saw the number one pick be used for Kevin love. The black Kevin love is also worth a high pick in the right
Scenario

Kevin Love fit the Spurs style of motion offense like a glove. LMA completely destroyed it. The Spurs weren't that half court oriented since 2011. Overall, Kevin Love is probably a better player but don't underestimate the power of Lebron. Wiggins wasn't a fit in Cleveland and they weren't in a rebuilding mode. Seeing as how Wiggins was going to need time to develop, it was an easy decision to trade off a number 1 draft pick to bring in a player that Lebron hand selected.

LMA is hardly a game changer. He's a high volume, high usage mid range jump shooter. Unless you're dealing with a brain dead GM or a draft that is ridiculously bad, I can't see him netting a top three pick.

[FYM]

:lmao

and why Boston would do that ?

Thanks for the good laugh

[TheGoldStandard]

Shit while we are at it, lets go ahead and trade Bonner for another lottery pick and we can be rebuilt in no time.

[024]

Nah that's not a fair trade. The Spurs should really hold out for the 1st pick for Parker. Only Ben Simmons is worth trading away Parker.

[cjw]

/thread

For Draymond Green, maybe (but might have to throw in Jabari Parker)

[Poolboy5623]

Maybe for the Celtics 2nd round pick...no way they are giving up 3, for a washed up pg, and/or a one trick pony (on offense ). Why would Bos do this?

[Spurtacular]

OP: You trolling or stupid?

[TXstbobcat]

Fact : Spurs cannot compete with status quo
They need a mix of younger players and top notch free agents.
Bring in Durant and get the #3 pick. If they can also get Conley, then it's icing on the cake.

The only player on the Spurs roster that Boston would be willing to trade the third pick in the draft for is Leonard and the Spurs would laugh at that trade.

[TXstbobcat]

OP: You trolling or stupid?

possibly retarded thinking Boston would trade the 3rd pick in the draft for Parker.

[Tully365]

Boston has two young guards, both on reasonable contracts... why on earth would they even consider trading for Parker? It makes no sense.

[SpursforSix]

Boston has two young guards, both on reasonable contracts... why on earth would they even consider trading for Parker? It makes no sense.

Parker would be an excellent mentor for their guards. A PG with Finals experience and one who's played with the greats.

[TXstbobcat]

Parker would be an excellent mentor for their guards. A PG with Finals experience and one who's played with the greats.

Boston isnt going to give up the third pick in the draft and pay 15 million a year or two years to get a mentor.

[tholdren]

Parker would be an excellent mentor for their guards. A PG with Finals experience and one who's played with the greats.
LOL

[SpursforSix]

Boston isnt going to give up the third pick in the draft and pay 15 million a year or two years to get a mentor.

Lol. It's not like he'd just be sitting on the bench. He'd be the backup PG.

[TXstbobcat]

Lol. It's not like he'd just be sitting on the bench. He'd be the backup PG.

Are you fucking kidding me ????? Do you really think the Boston would be willing to give up the third pick in the draft for a backup point guard???????? No way in hell that Boston makes that trade. :lmao

[tholdren]

Are you fucking kidding me ????? Do you really think the Boston would be willing to give up the third pick in the draft for a backup point guard???????? No way in hell that Boston makes that trade. :lmao
throw in becky for brad

[lmbebo]

day dreaming at its best ...

[SpursforSix]

Are you fucking kidding me ????? Do you really think the Boston would be willing to give up the third pick in the draft for a backup point guard???????? No way in hell that Boston makes that trade. :lmao

You're undervaluing Parker.

[cd98]

Boston isnt going to give up the third pick in the draft and pay 15 million a year or two years to get a mentor.

This. And it's not like Isaiah Thomas is a rookie. He's a vet that made the all star team and had stellar performances in the playoffs this year. Celtics will trade pics for superstars only. Otherwise they will stockpile their assets and see if they develop or provide for a trade for a superstar down the road.

[r0drig0lac]

Parker would be an excellent mentor for their guards. A PG with Finals experience and one who's played with the greats.

haha

[cd98]

You're undervaluing Parker.

To ask for a third round pick for Parker is overvaluing him. I like Parker and he is a contributor that still has some good years left. But his all star days are over. Boston has mid-level talent and an all-star point guard. They need a superstar to take them to the next level. They don't need Parker and his contract would eat up their cap space. If he had a smaller contract, then they might want him (though not with the third pick). But his cost makes no sense for a bench player. Also, the Spurs can't trade him until they replace him. We don't have a starting point guard in our stable. Spurs are in win now mode, so they won't give up their only point guard for a question mark as the third pick.

[TXstbobcat]

You're undervaluing Parker.

You are overvaluing Parker thinking anyone would trade the 3rd pick in the draft for him.

[SpursforSix]

To ask for a third round pick for Parker is overvaluing him. I like Parker and he is a contributor that still has some good years left. But his all star days are over. Boston has mid-level talent and an all-star point guard. They need a superstar to take them to the next level. They don't need Parker and his contract would eat up their cap space. If he had a smaller contract, then they might want him (though not with the third pick). But his cost makes no sense for a bench player. Also, the Spurs can't trade him until they replace him. We don't have a starting point guard in our stable. Spurs are in win now mode, so they won't give up their only point guard for a question mark as the third pick.

Did you even read my post? Spurs add Conley. Along with Durant, LMA, Green, and the third pick. They'd be formidable to say the least.

[GSH]

To balance the salaries, Boston would have to throw in Avery Bradley and Jae Crowder. That sounds do-able.

Once the Spurs lock up the 3 pick, they should really look into trading it for Denver's 3 first-round picks at 7, 15, and 19. This one brilliant trade is going to solve the Spurs' re-building problems.

[cjw]

This trade is so out there, I can't tell who in here is being serious

[SpursforSix]

To balance the salaries, Boston would have to throw in Avery Bradley and Jae Crowder. That sounds do-able.

Once the Spurs lock up the 3 pick, they should really look into trading it for Denver's 3 first-round picks at 7, 15, and 19. This one brilliant trade is going to solve the Spurs' re-building problems.

That's a pipe dream. No way Denver does that.

[TheGoldStandard]

That's a pipe dream. No way Denver does that.

Maybe if they throw in Anderson or Simmons.. Yeah, that'll do it.

[SpursforSix]

Maybe if they throw in Anderson or Simmons.. Yeah, that'll do it.

Then it doesn't make sense for the Spurs.

[Sean Cagney]

Did you even read my post? Spurs add Conley. Along with Durant, LMA, Green, and the third pick. They'd be formidable to say the least.

How in the world are they going to add KD and Conley too may I ask? Both? Plus the third pick for Parker, are you dreaming or high?

[SpursforSix]

How in the world are they going to add KD and Conley too may I ask? Both? Plus the third pick for Parker, are you dreaming or high?

I haven't crunched the numbers yet but I'm pretty sure it works. Maybe Conley and Durant each have to take less. Plus they'll save money on the Parker for 3 trade.

[TheGoldStandard]

How in the world are they going to add KD and Conley too may I ask? Both? Plus the third pick for Parker, are you dreaming or high?

They're going to take less money and get all that HEB money..

[Sean Cagney]

I haven't crunched the numbers yet but I'm pretty sure it works. Maybe Conley and Durant each have to take less. Plus they'll save money on the Parker for 3 trade.

I doubt someone trades the third pick in the draft for Parker at this point in time, Durant and Conley both would be doable but I really doubt it happens. They would have to do some trades probably and lose a lot of players on that bench plus TD and Manu retire.
They're going to take less money and get all that HEB money..

THAT IS IT!

[SpursforSix]

I doubt someone trades the third pick in the draft for Parker at this point in time, Durant and Conley both would be doable but I really doubt it happens. They would have to do some trades probably and lose a lot of players on that bench plus TD and Manu retire.

THAT IS IT!

I don't know then. They need a big. Maybe Green for Steven Adams.

[GSH]

How in the world are they going to add KD and Conley too may I ask? Both? Plus the third pick for Parker, are you dreaming or high?


LMAO... the premise to this thread is that Boston is going to give up the 3 pick for Tony Parker (and his albatross $15M) salary. Why stop there? KD and Conley will sign for $6M each, so the Spurs will have some money left to chase other FA's.

[TheGoldStandard]

LMAO... the premise to this thread is that Boston is going to give up the 3 pick for Tony Parker (and his albatross $15M) salary. Why stop there? KD and Conley will sign for $6M each, so the Spurs will have some money left to chase other FA's.

Fuck it, World Car might be able to get Lebron the the kind of endorsement money to make up for the paycut he'll take to come here..

[Sean Cagney]

I don't know then. They need a big. Maybe Green for Steven Adams.
I doubt they trade Green yet, they do need a big though I agree. They also need a PG or at least a very good back up PG if one is out there. Conley would be nice, put Parker on the bench and start Conley and sign Gasol or someone of the sort. That is not too far out there.

[GSH]

Fuck it, World Car might be able to get Lebron the the kind of endorsement money to make up for the paycut he'll take to come here..


It could happen. LeBron and Boban together could sell a shitload of Kias. It's as likely as anything else I've read.

Spurs FO just refuses to think out of the box. And they don't play 2K. Damn the man!

[venitian navigator]

No way Boston make that deal...
If ther's a chance to have a high first (5) for Green is with Minnesota (Thibs could really appreciate and need the 3 and d that Green is, and Green is probably a lot more reliable that what they could draft, like Hield).

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

Surely the Spurs would grab Kris Dunn with #3... if they had any fucking hope of getting #3, which they don't. Celts don't need Parker when they already have a glut of Gs (IT2, Smart, Bradley), and Spurs FO will not move TP anyway.

Don't suggest Green because that would open up a huge hole at SG, and he's an elite defender and 3 shooter on a cheap contract relative to what it'd cost to replace his quality.

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

No way Boston make that deal...
If ther's a chance to have a high first (5) for Green is with Minnesota (Thibs could really appreciate and need the 3 and d that Green is, and Green is probably a lot more reliable that what they could draft, like Hield).

So we trade Danny for #5 and take... Heild? Make no sense to me. Or do we hope Dunn falls to #5 (looks unlikely), and also hope Pop and TP would be fine with letting him start?

Nope, sit out this draft and FA season, make a minor trade for MCW and Plumlee, and get everything ready for a big splash in 2017.

[ffadicted]

Dumbest thread I've seen in a long time

[venitian navigator]

So we trade Danny for #5 and take... Heild? Make no sense to me. Or do we hope Dunn falls to #5 (looks unlikely), and also hope Pop and TP would be fine with letting him start?

Nope, sit out this draft and FA season, make a minor trade for MCW and Plumlee, and get everything ready for a big splash in 2017.

if spurs want Dunn and Minnie want green they just can make the deal the draft night...it's not out of question that Dunn is still available at 5 (after the onbious two, i see Bender and Brown as the more probable 3 - celtics - and 4 - suns - draft choice). It all depends, imho, if Thibs likes Rubio or not...

[GSH]

Surely the Spurs would grab Kris Dunn with #3... if they had any fucking hope of getting #3, which they don't. Celts don't need Parker when they already have a glut of Gs (IT2, Smart, Bradley), and Spurs FO will not move TP anyway.

Don't suggest Green because that would open up a huge hole at SG, and he's an elite defender and 3 shooter on a cheap contract relative to what it'd cost to replace his quality.


You're seriously discussing this? I understand the OP and a few others... but you?

Nobody is taking Parker's $15M salary, unless the Spurs throw in something else of value. NOBODY. But to take his salary, and give back a #3 draft pick? The GM would have to fire himself.

[TheGoldStandard]

You're seriously discussing this? I understand the OP and a few others... but you?

Nobody is taking Parker's $15M salary, unless the Spurs throw in something else of value. NOBODY. But to take his salary, and give back a #3 draft pick? The GM would have to fire himself.

These trades are all doable if you throw in the wild card that is Matt Bonner.. I mean which locker room, GM and head coach wouldn't want a Matt Bonner.. He's our ace in the hole. Spurs are going to want a shit load for him though, might just be our ticket to a multi team trade that nets us Picks, Superstars and cap space.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

So we trade Danny for #5 and take... Heild? Make no sense to me. Or do we hope Dunn falls to #5 (looks unlikely), and also hope Pop and TP would be fine with letting him start?

Nope, sit out this draft and FA season, make a minor trade for MCW and Plumlee, and get everything ready for a big splash in 2017.

Don't want Plumlee, he was the worst player on the Portland roster in this (last) year's playoffs. Rather have Alex Len so Boban doesn't have to curl up into the fetal position against him 4 times a year.

[dabom]

You know it's a crazy take when OP says it. Kinda like the Spurs losing to the Thunder. :lmao

[mo7888]

It's amazing how many people over or under estimate TP's worth. He has value...you don't have to include an asset to get rid of him but, he's not bringing back anything significant other than cap space.

[snickles]

the idiocy here is approaching the jimmer thread. why is this still a conversation?

[elbamba]

You couldn't get the third pick for Parker and Green. If we want to live in Fantasy Land, why not trade for 1996 Michael Jordan?

[SpursforSix]

You couldn't get the third pick for Parker and Green. If we want to live in Fantasy Land, why not trade for 1996 Michael Jordan?

We're not talking about both. Just one or the other. I think Parker makes more sense for the Spurs to trade as he's slowed down quite a bit and his contract makes it difficult to do other things. But if it came down to it, I'd be OK with Green going for the 3rd pick also.

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

We're not talking about both. Just one or the other. I think Parker makes more sense for the Spurs to trade as he's slowed down quite a bit and his contract makes it difficult to do other things. But if it came down to it, I'd be OK with Green going for the 3rd pick also.

Sure, but why trade one of them for the 3rd pick? Why not take the 1st for Parker and the 2nd for Green so we can get Simmons and Ingram?

[SpursforSix]

Sure, but why trade one of them for the 3rd pick? Why not take the 1st for Parker and the 2nd for Green so we can get Simmons and Ingram?

There's no way Philly or Lakers give up their picks.

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

There's no way Philly or Lakers give up their picks.

But Boston would?

[SpursforSix]

But Boston would?

Boston has a much more developed team than LA or Philly. They could use an experienced player and afford to trade a draft pick. Lakers and Philly should clearly be building for the future and need a long term player. But even if Parker would be beneficial to either of them, they're too dumb to make that move anyway.

[TXstbobcat]

You couldn't get the third pick for Parker and Green. If we want to live in Fantasy Land, why not trade for 1996 Michael Jordan?

How many HEB gift cards will the Spurs trade for '96 Jordan???????

[elbamba]

I prefer my 1996 Jordan trade personally. Maybe we don't need to lose Parker or Green, we could just offer up Diaw. He can play all 5 positions. I think he could fit well with Pippen and Rodman and help them 3 peat.

[elbamba]

How many HEB gift cards will the Spurs trade for '96 Jordan???????

Did we use gift cards in 1996?

[palangi]

Don't want Plumlee, he was the worst player on the Portland roster in this (last) year's playoffs. Rather have Alex Len so Boban doesn't have to curl up into the fetal position against him 4 times a year.
You do know there is more than one Plumlee in the league. You're thinking of the wrong one

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

Boston has a much more developed team than LA or Philly. They could use an experienced player and afford to trade a draft pick. Lakers and Philly should clearly be building for the future and need a long term player. But even if Parker would be beneficial to either of them, they're too dumb to make that move anyway.

The developped part of Boston's roster is the backcourt, they have 5 PGs/SGs contracted for next season already. They need bigs. They're not trading the 3rd pick for Parker or Green.

[SpursforSix]

The developped part of Boston's roster is the backcourt, they have 5 PGs/SGs contracted for next season already. They need bigs. They're not trading the 3rd pick for Parker or Green.

If they have Parker, then they can trade one of their PG/SG for a pretty good big. For Boston, the move doesn't end with just acquiring Parker.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

You do know there is more than one Plumlee in the league. You're thinking of the wrong one

The Plumlee's and the Zeller's. There are like 6 of them combined in the league, they're all soft, tall, stiff, white, and limited. Do not want

[TheGoldStandard]

If RC isn't willing to make the calls then he needs to go, these are all doable I can't even conceive why we haven't tried this before.

[r0drig0lac]

because people are discussing serious about this? is some kind of sarcasm or this thread is making people dumber

[TheGoldStandard]

because people are discussing serious about this? is some kind of sarcasm or this thread is making people dumber

You must be a player fan trying to protect Parker and Green and Anderson.. They can easily net a 3rd probably an 11th and a 18th pick.. Which we could parlay half that into real superstars or solid draft picks.. I mean its a no brainer.. RC has been holding the Spurs back because Pop wants to win with scrubs.

[steeledl]

How about Patty Mills for curry?

[SpursforSix]

You must be a player fan trying to protect Parker and Green and Anderson.. They can easily net a 3rd probably an 11th and a 18th pick.. Which we could parlay half that into real superstars or solid draft picks.. I mean its a no brainer.. RC has been holding the Spurs back because Pop wants to win with scrubs.

IMO, Anderson doesn't have much trade value. Further, I still think he could develop into a more important role on the Spurs. Of the three you mentioned, he has the most untapped potential. Unless Green magically finds consistency. But Green still can't get to the basket. Parker is the most realistic to trade for the 3. If Green had a great season, he'd obviously be up there. But of course if he had that great season, Spurs would want to keep him considering his D.

[mo7888]

IMO, Anderson doesn't have much trade value. Further, I still think he could develop into a more important role on the Spurs. Of the three you mentioned, he has the most untapped potential. Unless Green magically finds consistency. But Green still can't get to the basket. Parker is the most realistic to trade for the 3. If Green had a great season, he'd obviously be up there. But of course if he had that great season, Spurs would want to keep him considering his D.

Your trolling skills are 1st rate...

[r0drig0lac]

How about Patty Mills for curry?

Parker + Mills + Diaw for Curry + Iggy... maybe warriors should throw the 1st pick to complete the deal

[SpursforSix]

Your trolling skills are 1st rate...

With what? Anderson? He's not my favorite player by a long shot. But from time to time, he does some good things. He's obviously a good passer. And he seems to be confident and able to hit the mid-range jumper. Doesn't get flustered. SLOOOOOWWW as hell but amazingly can get his shot off and get into the paint at times. Is he a star? No. Is he a potential starter? Maybe...probably not. But if he gets some more experience and playing time, I can see him improving what he already does. And also possibly becoming more efficient from 3 point rage. None of that is a stretch. I don't expect him to start dunking over niggas in the paint. In short, I think he can contribute.

Green seems to be what he's shown. A good defender that sometimes gets into grooves where he can nail 3s. But when he's off, he's way off. I would think as a fairly athletic guard, at some point in his life, he would have learned to dribble, drive, and finish. But he's terrible. If he was going to get better at these things, I would have expected it by now.

[TXstbobcat]

How about Patty Mills for curry?

Seth curry?????

[mo7888]

With what? Anderson? He's not my favorite player by a long shot. But from time to time, he does some good things. He's obviously a good passer. And he seems to be confident and able to hit the mid-range jumper. Doesn't get flustered. SLOOOOOWWW as hell but amazingly can get his shot off and get into the paint at times. Is he a star? No. Is he a potential starter? Maybe...probably not. But if he gets some more experience and playing time, I can see him improving what he already does. And also possibly becoming more efficient from 3 point rage. None of that is a stretch. I don't expect him to start dunking over niggas in the paint. In short, I think he can contribute.

Green seems to be what he's shown. A good defender that sometimes gets into grooves where he can nail 3s. But when he's off, he's way off. I would think as a fairly athletic guard, at some point in his life, he would have learned to dribble, drive, and finish. But he's terrible. If he was going to get better at these things, I would have expected it by now.

Epic

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Seth curry?????
Don't think the kings are giving him up honestly. They played him a heck of a lot towards the end of their season and he did pretty good, they seem him as part of the future. Plus he's a short drive away from his big bro so there's that

[palangi]

The Plumlee's and the Zeller's. There are like 6 of them combined in the league, they're all soft, tall, stiff, white, and limited. Do not want
Very untrue for the athletic Plumlee brothers.

[spursince#99]

We're not never or ever trading Tony Parker. That's just wishful thinking.

[YGWHI]

We're not never or ever trading Tony Parker. That's just wishful thinking.

Agree. The Spurs won't trade Parker, it will never happen. But we have 10 threads about it every offseason...it's some Spurstalk tradition.

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

You're seriously discussing this? I understand the OP and a few others... but you?

Nobody is taking Parker's $15M salary, unless the Spurs throw in something else of value. NOBODY. But to take his salary, and give back a #3 draft pick? The GM would have to fire himself.

See my post before the one you quoted. ;)

[Ditty]

A little off topic. I really don't get what makes Boston a "free agent destination" this upcoming offseason :lol ? Boston is great city, and wonderful sports town, but outside of Brad Stevens their best players are nice "role" players to have if you're a championship contender. No franchise type player like Paul Pierce when they were bad before Garnett and Allen were traded there. They have a lot of draft picks in a decent draft. No enticing talent when they pick like when they traded Jeff Green (Solid prospect at that time) for Ray Allen. Unless a team wants a guy with a cool first name (Dragan Bender).:lol. If Boston somehow lands a franchise type player in their prime for all those picks they could build a solid team quick, that could possibly interest both Horford or Durant who both want to play with a team that's guaranteed to win now and not play with a bunch of rookies. Seems like Stevens wants to develop his own guys though.

[DenialTwist]

Agree. The Spurs won't trade Parker, it will never happen. But we have 10 threads about it every offseason...it's some Spurstalk tradition.

Parker is never going to be traded. He and his contract will be a drag for the Spurs the next two years. The Spurs PG position is the one gaping hole that the Spurs won't be able to find a solution for.

[TheGoldStandard]

A little off topic. I really don't get what makes Boston a "free agent destination" this upcoming offseason :lol ? Boston is great city, and wonderful sports town, but outside of Brad Stevens their best players are nice "role" players to have if you're a championship contender. No franchise type player like Paul Pierce when they were bad before Garnett and Allen were traded there. They have a lot of draft picks in a decent draft. No enticing talent when they pick like when they traded Jeff Green (Solid prospect at that time) for Ray Allen. Unless a team wants a guy with a cool first name (Dragan Bender).:lol. If Boston somehow lands a franchise type player in their prime for all those picks they could build a solid team quick, that could possibly interest both Horford or Durant who both want to play with a team that's guaranteed to win now and not play with a bunch of rookies. Seems like Stevens wants to develop his own guys though.

They play in the East.. You'll at least sniff the playoffs every year of that contract and perhaps even advance far enough to look like you were a good player.

[GSH]

If RC isn't willing to make the calls then he needs to go, these are all doable I can't even conceive why we haven't tried this before.


Hard to believe he's the same guy who traded away Paul George.

[99 Problems]

How about Patty Mills for curry?

MVPatty is proven playoff star, sorry Steff.

[cutewizard]

i want THON MAKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[TheGoldStandard]

i want THON MAKER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:pop: Matty and Kyle already stretch the floor

[Mal]

Green could easily be worth that 16th pick, looking from Celtics standpoint

[sasaint]

Hard to believe he's the same guy who traded away Paul George.

:lol Paul George is no Tony Parker.