Hacked Clinton email dumps trickling in

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/

more to come from wikileaks as well

http://www.mediaite.com/online/julian-assange-knows-fbi-wont-indict-hillary-will-seek-concessions-from-her-administration/

[Reck]

Oh Noooooooooooooooooo

[TheSanityAnnex]

Oh Noooooooooooooooooo
did you think this stuff would come out before she clinched? :lol

the fun is just about to start.

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?

[Reck]

did you think this stuff would come out before she clinched? :lol

the fun is just about to start.

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?

Let's see where it leads but this is to be taken with a grain of salt. Asange is not exactly being neutral here. To me he sounds just like a bitter republican desperately trying to take a Clinton down. There is an agenda, undoubtely.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Let's see where it leads but this is to be taken with a grain of salt. Asange is not exactly being neutral here. To me he sounds just like a bitter republican desperately trying to take a Clinton down. There is an agenda, undoubtely.

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?

[Reck]

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?

If they reccomend an indictment then she'll likely be charged with something, no? That kinds of takes her out of the running I would think.

[hater]

Mohamar ghadaffis ghosts avenging him tbh

Got damn everyone is paying for that fuckup

[Fabbs]

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?
I have little faith in FBIs indictment being anything other then political.
But no I won't vote for her.

I wanted to feel the Bern.
Now it's just another case of like Ralph Nader said, not a dimes bit of difference. Both establishment Demons and Repugs are told what to do by the corporations.

[pgardn]

I have little faith in FBIs indictment being anything other then political.
But no I won't vote for her.

I wanted to feel the Bern.
Now it's just another case of like Ralph Nader said, not a dimes bit of difference. Both establishment Demons and Repugs are told what to do by the corporations.

So you will vote for Trump as he listens to himself.

[baseline bum]

I have little faith in FBIs indictment being anything other then political.
But no I won't vote for her.

I wanted to feel the Bern.
Now it's just another case of like Ralph Nader said, not a dimes bit of difference. Both establishment Demons and Repugs are told what to do by the corporations.

Nader worked out great for us last time helping Bush take the country into its most disastrous 8 years since the days of the Civil War and reconstruction.

[TheSanityAnnex]

If they reccomend an indictment then she'll likely be charged with something, no? That kinds of takes her out of the running I would think.

It's just a recommendation by the FBI, Loretta Lynch would have to decide to indict. So again, if the FBI recommends an indictment will you still vote for her?

[Reck]

It's just a recommendation by the FBI, Loretta Lynch would have to decide to indict. So again, if the FBI recommends an indictment will you still vote for her?

If she is allowed to run, why not? I'm sure as fuck not going to vote for dumb fuck Trump.

[TheSanityAnnex]

If she is allowed to run, why not? I'm sure as fuck not going to vote for dumb fuck Trump.

Why not? :lol
Some of you liberals are insane.

[Reck]

Why not? :lol
Some of you liberals are insane.

Sooo what's your fix? Let Trump run unnoposed? :lol

I will vote democrat no matter who's there. I will not waste a vote on someone like Stein or Johnson.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Sooo what's your fix? Let Trump run unnoposed? :lol

I will vote democrat no matter who's there. I will not waste a vote on someone like Stein or Johnson.

I would assume Bernie or Biden would be ushered in. It just blows my mind you would still cast a vote for someone the FBI recommends is indicted. Have you no morals?

[Spurminator]

Count me in too, recommended indictment or not. Even if she's impeached, her VP is probably an improvement over both of the current top candidates.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Disgusting

[Spurminator]

Disgusting

It's a disgusting race. She's preferable to the alternative.

[Aztecfan03]

Nader worked out great for us last time helping Bush take the country into its most disastrous 8 years since the days of the Civil War and reconstruction.
:rolleyes

[baseline bum]

Count me in too, recommended indictment or not. Even if she's impeached, her VP is probably an improvement over both of the current top candidates.

Pretty much this.

[RandomGuy]

did you think this stuff would come out before she clinched? :lol

the fun is just about to start.

And be honest here, will you still vote for her if the FBI recommends an indictment?

Not. Trump.

[RandomGuy]

Mohamar ghadaffis ghosts avenging him tbh

Got damn everyone is paying for that fuckup

ghadaffi deserved what he got. good riddance.

[RandomGuy]

I would assume Bernie or Biden would be ushered in. It just blows my mind you would still cast a vote for someone the FBI recommends is indicted. Have you no morals?

Morals = vote for Trump???

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

Count me in too, recommended indictment or not. Even if she's impeached, her VP is probably an improvement over both of the current top candidates.

Eyup.

I wonder if she won't pick Bernie for VP.

[boutons_deux]

ghadaffi deserved what he got. good riddance.

Did the Libyan people deserve what they've been getting since Khadafi and will be for many years too come.

Not kicking (even vicious) sleeping dogs is proving to be much better than regime change.

btw, Tunisian "government", one of the better outcomes of the Arab Spring, just fired about 100 govt employees complaining about govt corruption, which I suppose is step up from just killing them.

[baseline bum]

Eyup.

I wonder if she won't pick Bernie for VP.

No chance in hell, the Democrats don't want Sanders to be a heartbeat from the presidency. Castro is a much safer choice for them.

[baseline bum]

Also I can't picture Sanders ever joining a ticket with a conservative democrat like Clinton.

[RandomGuy]

Did the Libyan people deserve what they've been getting since Khadafi and will be for many years too come.

Not kicking (even vicious) sleeping dogs is proving to be much better than regime change.

btw, Tunisian "government", one of the better outcomes of the Arab Spring, just fired about 100 govt employees complaining about govt corruption, which I suppose is step up from just killing them.

Libya was something of an artifice of colonialism, like most countries in Africa/ME. It is therefore an artificial construct, and prone to the kind of divisions we see now.

Dunno if seeing him gone is going to be bad/good in the long run versus leaving his despotic ass there. Torn, just like I am with Iraq.

One has to wonder. I think trying to say it was or wasn't worth it is going to be premature, as this kind of shit is really long term, i.e. wait 10-20 years before even trying to figure out where to weigh on that good/bad scale.

[RandomGuy]

No chance in hell, the Democrats don't want Sanders to be a heartbeat from the presidency. Castro is a much safer choice for them.

I dont' think the establishment Dems really are that antagonistic to Bernie. They are smart enough to see the eye-popping demographics of his supporters, and pick out the significance of that.

[baseline bum]

I dont' think the establishment Dems really are that antagonistic to Bernie. They are smart enough to see the eye-popping demographics of his supporters, and pick out the significance of that.

Are you serious? The guy got no support whatsoever from the superdelegates in a race that would have otherwise been pretty close. Sanders isn't a democrat, he's a democratic socialist. The party is significantly to the right of Bernie. The Democrats don't have to care about their voters (and they don't), they just have to suck less than the far right nationalist party.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Morals = vote for Trump???

:lmao
My comment had zero to do with Trump. Nice though to see you freely admit you'd still cast your vote for a person recommended for a federal indictment. :tu

[spurraider21]

My comment had zero to do with Trump. Nice though to see you freely admit you'd still cast your vote for a person recommended for a federal indictment. :tu
:rolleyes

its an election in a 2 party system

when you ask "you would vote for X???" you are always talking about candidate Y, too

[boutons_deux]

FBI won't recommend indictment unless they are absolutely sure of winning. Losing would make them look foolish AND politicized.

[Reck]

Disgusting

:lmao Internal meltdown.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:rolleyes

its an election in a 2 party system

when you ask "you would vote for X???" you are always talking about candidate Y, too
Y has no pending criminal indictment.

[spurraider21]

Y has no pending criminal indictment.
i'm aware. but mentioning "how can u vote for hillary" in an election where the only (realistic) alternative is trump and then saying "my comment had zero to do with trump" is just :rolleyes

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lmao Internal meltdown.
Odd sense of humor you have.

[TheSanityAnnex]

i'm aware. but mentioning "how can u vote for hillary" in an election where the only (realistic) alternative is trump and then saying "my comment had zero to do with trump" is just :rolleyes
I never asked how. I asked if they could if the FBI recommended an indictment. Quite different. roll eyes emoji

[DJR210]

Haven't read many of the leaked emails, nor do I plan on it, but I noticed this broad has a tendency to email someone to ask if they are available to talk on the phone.. Gotta hide that paper trail as best she could IMO

[RandomGuy]

My comment had zero to do with Trump. Nice though to see you freely admit you'd still cast your vote for a person recommended for a federal indictment. :tu

(sighs heavily)

I will, yet again, do your thinking for you.

Your comment had everything to do with Trump, because the choice is not made in a vacuum. It isn't Clinton or Nothing.

If you want a moral consideration, one has to consider choices.

I have a moral obligation to vote, and to choose the candidate that I think best for the job, based on whatever criteria I deem important.

I will therefore vote, since it is important.

While I can choose among the many candidates, the practical consideration boils down to two at this point.

Trump

or

Clinton

I will happily, enthusiastically, emphatically vote for someone recommended for federal indictment, without one single iota of regret, if my only other realistic choice is Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is the most fucktarded, ill-suited person to hold the presidency than I have seen ever.

I would vote for Dan Quayle, Mitt Romney, Pat Buchannan, or John McCain ahead of Trump.

In a tossup between the vacuus twit Palin and Trump, I might be torn, but I would vote for Palin.

The fact that you think your comment had nothing to do with Trump either reflects a dishonesty, or lack of awareness of that choice.

Which is it, dishonesty, or stupidity?

[RandomGuy]

I never asked how. I asked if they could if the FBI recommended an indictment. Quite different. roll eyes emoji


:rolleyes

Try the advanced reply. It is in the lower right corner of the stock bank. Click the [more] button for a pop up that will provide a larger array.

[RandomGuy]

:rolleyes

its an election in a 2 party system

when you ask "you would vote for X???" you are always talking about candidate Y, too

I see I wasn't the only person, also yet again, to note the error in reasoning. Seems to be a pattern.

[ducks]

Haven't read many of the leaked emails, nor do I plan on it, but I noticed this broad has a tendency to email someone to ask if they are available to talk on the phone.. Gotta hide that paper trail as best she could IMO
She a bad bad person