PDA

View Full Version : WHO SAYS NO



SeanElliot'sLeftNut
07-21-2016, 04:56 PM
Spurs sign Ty Lawson to a 2 year minimum deal with player option in second year. This allows Ty Lawson to raise his stock and be a free agent in 2018.

Spurs culture perfect for him. Dude just needs more structure, guy was great not long ago. Only 28

spurs trade patty mills for Ben Macklmore. Salaries line up perfect. BM is dying in Sacramento, he's talented and shows flashes imagine if he had Pop. Sacremento needs shooters around Demarcus. Patty is perfect for them and for their culture.

Who says no?

jon123spurs
07-21-2016, 05:00 PM
No

SeanElliot'sLeftNut
07-21-2016, 05:04 PM
Why not? Thoughts?

Chinook
07-21-2016, 05:04 PM
I'll do it if they don't.

tholdren
07-21-2016, 05:41 PM
meh - one fat pg for a fatter pg?

TrainOfThought5
07-21-2016, 05:42 PM
Im not totally opposed.

Joseph Kony
07-21-2016, 05:52 PM
Him and RC would be best friends. Then we can sign JR so they can cruising together

apalisoc_9
07-21-2016, 05:59 PM
Id give lawson the chepeaset deal with a team option for year 2.

T Park
07-21-2016, 06:19 PM
That makes a shit load of sense. however. Lawson lost his speed. When a speedy point guard loses their speed, theyre done. Parker hasnt lost ALL of his speed, but hes lost a bunch and people here want to label him as the anti christ.

Austin_Toros
07-21-2016, 06:28 PM
I'd take McLemore. Don't think it would happen though.

Spurtacular
07-22-2016, 03:10 AM
Id give lawson the chepeaset deal with a team option for year 2.

So, just a quickie in the car with an option for bukake.

Well, back to the subject at hand.

Spurtacular
07-22-2016, 03:13 AM
I'd take McLemore. Don't think it would happen though.

He sucks, tbh. Kings should've stuck with Jimmer.

r0drig0lac
07-22-2016, 04:50 AM
no

SeanElliot'sLeftNut
07-22-2016, 06:48 AM
TBH the Kings ruined Jimmer and and are close to ruining BM. Kings are a trash fire, but I think ty Lawson and Ben Macklemore is good return for just patty mills. Plus both sides win.