Log in

View Full Version : Per Scarborough: Independent conservative will announce presidential bid today


Reck
08-08-2016, 09:01 AM
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/290710-scarborough-independent-conservative-candidate-will-announce

:lol GOP
:lol imploding
Splits
08-08-2016, 09:14 AM
The venerable Evan McMullin.

Wait, who?
Reck
08-08-2016, 09:18 AM
Who the fuck is Evan Mullins? :lol

This would have been huge if it was someone like Romney. He would definitely siphon enough votes that Trump would lose embarrasingly.

But no one even knows who this guy even is so meh.
boutons_deux
08-08-2016, 09:33 AM
Bishop Gekko did file to run, but he's probably happier staying with Bain P/E and raping companies
hater
08-08-2016, 09:35 AM
Why bother? A neocon is already running for the blue party :lol
Reck
08-08-2016, 11:29 AM
https://twitter.com/Evan_McMullin

This guy's twitter went from 400 followers to 13k in mere hours. :lol
Pelicans78
08-08-2016, 11:31 AM
Gary Johnson is already an independent conservative
DMX7
08-08-2016, 11:49 AM
Who the fuck is Evan Mullins? :lol

This would have been huge if it was someone like Romney. He would definitely siphon enough votes that Trump would lose embarrasingly.

But no one even knows who this guy even is so meh.

I would switch my vote from Hillary to Romney in an instant.
boutons_deux
08-08-2016, 12:08 PM
I would switch my vote from Hillary to Romney in an instant.

more evidence that you don't have a fucking clue
DMX7
08-08-2016, 12:11 PM
more evidence that you don't have a fucking clue

Romney has more integrity.
Reck
08-08-2016, 12:19 PM
Romney has more integrity.

47% much?

He's an entitled dick. Feels less entitled than Trump for sure but still.
DMX7
08-08-2016, 12:20 PM
47% much?

He's an entitled dick. Feels less entitled than Trump for sure but still.

What does that have to do with integrity?
Reck
08-08-2016, 12:23 PM
What does that have to do with integrity?

You cant have intergrity if you're looking for #1 first.

If you're running for president, it is assumed you're working for the public first.
DMX7
08-08-2016, 12:26 PM
You cant have intergrity if you're looking for #1 first.

If you're running for president, it is assumed you're working for the public first.

It was an ignorant comment directed at wealthy donors (I think). He just wants more people to contribute something. We do have a massive national debt. Those are the wrong people to target of course.
baseline bum
08-08-2016, 12:28 PM
This would have been huge if it was someone like Romney. He would definitely siphon enough votes that Trump would lose embarrasingly.


If Romney ran he'd have a decent chance of keeping Hillary from 270, and then the congress would elect Romney president.
Reck
08-08-2016, 12:33 PM
If Romney ran he'd have a decent chance of keeping Hillary from 270, and then the congress would elect Romney president.

Umm not sure about that. Most states have reached the deadline for being in the ballot. He would be lucky to be eligible in 15 states at this point.
baseline bum
08-08-2016, 12:36 PM
Umm not sure about that. Most states have reached the deadline for being in the ballot. He would be lucky to be eligible in 15 states at this point.

Well yeah, it's too late for him to run. But if he had gotten his name on the ballots in time he'd get Utah, maybe Wyoming, and could have a decent shot at Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and maybe Wisconsin.
ducks
08-08-2016, 03:22 PM
http://nationbuilder.com lol free trail software jeez
ducks
08-08-2016, 03:23 PM
https://www.evanmcmullin.com/economy
he is a loser
ducks
08-08-2016, 03:24 PM
wait is lying ted will run to?
what about bernie?
or al gore?