Where does Tony Parker rank in the best PGs of all-time debate?

[daledondale]

Paul's played 22 win teams his whole career and hasn't hit 45 points in a game. That's great he had 20 assists against the 9-18 Pelicans. Really?, taking who scored more points in one game as parameter to compare two players?. You're more biased than TGY. You're out of your mind if compare Tony with Paul. Tony is a better slasher, but Paul is better playmaker and defender, and have much more IQ than Tony.

[Clipper Nation]

Awesome, Parker had a 55 point game. Paul has never even hit 45.
:lmao There really is no difference at all between Porker stans and Kobe stans.

[gambit1990]

MIN
PTS
REB
AST
FG%


tony
27:50
2
2
2
12.5


cp3
23:23
19
7
6
54.5

[SASdynasty!]

MIN
PTS
REB
AST
FG%


tony
27:50
2
2
2
12.5


cp3
23:23
19
7
6
54.5


Hey look CP3 had 19/6. Triple the points, double the assists, and up the FG% and that would be comparable to Parker's 55 point game.

[gambit1990]

Hey look CP3 had 19/6. Triple the points, double the assists, and up the FG% and that would be comparable to Parker's 55 point game.
parker had three assists tonight. which was triple the amount he had in the game he played in before :lol

[kaji157]

Tony would never rank top15 in "all time" lists for the same reason Manu would never.

They both played with Tim Duncan.

Chris Paul never had such a dominant big man and another sidekick like Tony and Manu always have, and he will come down to be remembered as a better player than both Tony and Manu.

On Tony´s case, he was never able to find any success when Manu was down, or Tim was Down. While Tim and Manu eliminated OKC at home down 6 at halftime, when both had like 40 years.

[thiste]

Tony would never rank top15 in "all time" lists for the same reason Manu would never.

They both played with Tim Duncan.

Chris Paul never had such a dominant big man and another sidekick like Tony and Manu always have, and he will come down to be remembered as a better player than both Tony and Manu.

On Tony´s case, he was never able to find any success when Manu was down, or Tim was Down. While Tim and Manu eliminated OKC at home down 6 at halftime, when both had like 40 years.

Yeah let's just forget how many times Tony has carried us throughout the years. People forget so easily

[gambit1990]

"tony is better than cp3" :lmao

[Mikeanaro]

Very low, tbh.

[SpursforSix]

He's not in the top 20 at best. Strickland was better. If he had been on these Pop teams, Spurs would have at least another ring.

[SpursforSix]

That being said, I loved watching him play when he still had his quickness. He was devastating. Too bad he didn't work on his shot earlier in his career.

[gambit1990]

cp3 throughly outplayed parker... again.

and no, he won't age like parker... because cp3 is an actual PG.

[gambit1990]

from an earlier game this season:





MIN
PTS
REB
AST
FG%


tony
27:50
2
2
2
12.5


cp3
23:23
19
7
6
54.5




not that far from tonight's play.

[gambit1990]

Inarguably Top 5
:lol

[kaji157]

Yeah let's just forget how many times Tony has carried us throughout the years. People forget so easily

Not the point.

[tholdren]

it depends your idea of best. Tony was a better finisher and scorer in his prime. Paul was a jack of all trades. you need a scorer, Tony. you want a real all around pg paul

[bklynspursfan]

cp3 throughly outplayed parker... again.

and no, he won't age like parker... because cp3 is an actual PG.

Nash was an actual PG. did u miss how wonderfully he aged?

[Brazil]

News flash brought by gambit the retarded... cp3 is better than Parker !! Call the police... :lmao

[gambit1990]

Nash was an actual PG. did u miss how wonderfully he aged?
nash had back problems.

[gambit1990]

News flash brought by gambit the retarded... cp3 is better than Parker !! Call the police... :lmao
people in this thread thought otherwise.

[Brazil]

people in this thread thought otherwise.

People in this thread were arguing career you were arguing about last night... my god cp3 outplayed Parker... really?

:lmao

[gambit1990]

People in this thread were arguing career you were arguing about last night... my god cp3 outplayed Parker... really?

:lmao
i wasn't arguing with anyone in this thread. i just pointed out cp3 thoroughly outplayed tony again.

why don't you tell us about how parker played in november?

[SASdynasty!]

He's not in the top 20 at best. Strickland was better. If he had been on these Pop teams, Spurs would have at least another ring.
Hahaha Spurs would have had another ring if anyone but Strickland was handling the ball in that G7.

[Brazil]

i wasn't arguing with anyone in this thread. i just pointed out cp3 thoroughly outplayed tony again.

why don't you tell us about how parker played in november?

Oh you pointed out that cp3 outplayed tony Parker last night... no shit Sherlock... not surprised you did not get the November Parker thread you are an idiot with limited brain resources

[FkLA]

People in this thread were arguing career you were arguing about last night... my god cp3 outplayed Parker... really?

:lmao

Do you think Enrique has had a better career than CP3? :lol

[gambit1990]

Oh you pointed out that cp3 outplayed tony Parker last night... no shit Sherlock... you are an idiot with limited brain resources

i just pointed out cp3 thoroughly outplayed tony again this season.



you are an idiot with limited brain resources
that's rich coming from someone who thought tony might not fall off a cliff :lol

[Brazil]

Do you think Enrique has had a better career than CP3? :lol

Read the posts before throwing :lol

[Brazil]

that's rich coming from someone who thought tony might not fall off a cliff :lol

I called Parker done 2 years ago... :cry cp3 outplayed Parker :cry

[gambit1990]

I called Parker done 2 years ago...
you remembered i was right. spurs shoulda traded him then like i said.

[Brazil]

you remembered i was right. spurs shoulda traded him then like i said.

Parker decline started at Euro. I'm not sure where you were right about anything tbh...

Sure Spurs should have traded him for CP3... smh

[Clipper Nation]

I called Parker done 2 years ago...
So, 14 years too late?

[gambit1990]

Parker decline started at Euro.
:lol

Sure Spurs should have traded him for CP3... smh
i would've been willing to give parker up for a lot less than cp3. unlike you.

next november, will post another thread about how tp is looking good against scrub ass teams? or will you just bump the one you already made?

[SpursforSix]

Hahaha Spurs would have had another ring if anyone but Strickland was handling the ball in that G7.

That's a jump.

But I said on a Pop team. I'd take prime Strickland (under control) over prime Parker. Much better passer. And still great at getting to the rim. Not as quick as Parker. But he would have been perfect for the beautiful game.

Not to mention, he was superior on defense and rebounded better.

[Brazil]

:lol

i would've been willing to give parker up for a lot less than cp3. unlike you.

next november, will post another thread about how tp is looking good against scrub ass teams? or will you just bump the one you already made?

again you are acting like the idiot village you are... November parker... you did not get it

:lol

[gambit1990]

again you are acting like the idiot village you are

Parker decline started at Euro.

[SpursforSix]

that's rich coming from someone who thought tony might not fall off a cliff :lol

This is one of the biggest bonehead player fan arguments on here.

Realist: Parker is getting slower. He's not a great passer and not a prolific 3 point shooter. He's not going to get better.
Parkerfan: Fuck you. He knows the system and has shot better from 3 than at any point in his life.
Realist: He doesn't take that many 3's. Unless he's wide open. Plus his defense sucks.
Parkerfan: Have you seen his dribbledribbledribble?

[dabom]

This is one of the biggest bonehead player fan arguments on here.

Realist: Parker is getting slower. He's not a great passer and not a prolific 3 point shooter. He's not going to get better.
Parkerfan: Fuck you. He knows the system and has shot better from 3 than at any point in his life.
Realist: He doesn't take that many 3's. Unless he's wide open. Plus his defense sucks.
Parkerfan: Have you seen his dribbledribbledribble?

I hear he dribbles good under "pressure". :lol

[MaNu4Tres]

Not top 10, maybe top 20 or 25.

[james evans]

he's top 20 for sure. Definitely not top 10. If people want to put him top 10 for having 4 rings, where do Sam Jones rank at SG for with his 10 rings? I've never seen anyone put him in the top 10 of sgs all time.

[gambit1990]

https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/g_cLBw4xzBaJ2snr8VXXTnKmEQA=/800x0/filters:no_upscale()/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2406578/tony_poll.0.png

https://image.ibb.co/j6WJkk/C_Xc_Sqz_WAAI7qy_T.jpg


does DMC prefer a twitter poll taken over the course of a few hours or PER during the playoffs, all time?

[DMC]

https://image.ibb.co/j6WJkk/C_Xc_Sqz_WAAI7qy_T.jpg


does DMC prefer a twitter poll taken over the course of a few hours or PER during the playoffs, all time?

I prefer to count the rings. Paul = zero rings. Tony = 4 rings and a Finals MVP.

Enough said.

[gambit1990]

I prefer to count the rings. Paul = zero rings. Tony = 4 rings and a Finals MVP.

Enough said.
oh, i didn't know you thought derek fisher was better than parker.
http://ll-media.tmz.com/2017/01/31/0131-derek-fisher-glogovan-instagram-7.jpg

[dabom]

:lol

[DMC]

oh, i didn't know you thought derek fisher was better than parker.
http://ll-media.tmz.com/2017/01/31/0131-derek-fisher-glogovan-instagram-7.jpg

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.

Derek is better than Chris as well. Derek isn't a choker, quite the opposite it seems.

[gambit1990]

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.

Derek is better than Chris as well. Derek isn't a choker, quite the opposite it seems.
delegitimize everything you've ever heard from DMC.

[dabom]

:lol

[gambit1990]

DMC waiting to reply until twitter gets to vote again.

[gambit1990]

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.
i dare you to point me to when cp3 had a better team "than tony has rung with" :lmao

you're posting like you're mid or dpg tbh.

[gambit1990]

DMC apparently not giving a fuck about who a player named "tim duncan" is.

[gambit1990]

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.
are you donald trump?

[DMC]

DMC apparently not giving a fuck about who a player named "tim duncan" is.

Tony Parker
Patty Mills
Tim Duncan
Manu Ginobili
Boris Diaw
Marco
Jeff Ayres
Kawhi Leonard
Danny Green
Tiago Splitter
Aaron Baynes

vs

Chris Paul
Blake Griffin
DeAndre Jordan
Jamal Crawford
JJ Redick
Matt Barnes
Glen Davis
Hedo Turkoglu
Nate Robinson
Jordan Farmar


Who's better?

Clue: 2nd team beat 1st team the in the 2014-2015 playoffs in the 1st round.
Clue 2: 1st team won the Finals the previous year.

[dabom]

Are we forgetting porker was a broken down cancer and tiago was a broken glass vagina all year. :lmao

[dabom]

That 2014 Spurs team was Amazing. The 2015 was not the same Spurs team and anyone saying they were, is a fucking moron. :lol

[gambit1990]

Tony Parker
Patty Mills
Tim Duncan
Manu Ginobili
Boris Diaw
Marco
Jeff Ayres
Kawhi Leonard
Danny Green
Tiago Splitter
Aaron Baynes

vs

Chris Paul
Blake Griffin
DeAndre Jordan
Jamal Crawford
JJ Redick
Matt Barnes
Glen Davis
Hedo Turkoglu
Nate Robinson
Jordan Farmar


Who's better?

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.
um, tony's team didn't ring that year... they lost to cp3... in the first round.

[SASdynasty!]

Tony Parker
Patty Mills
Tim Duncan
Manu Ginobili
Boris Diaw
Marco
Jeff Ayres
Kawhi Leonard
Danny Green
Tiago Splitter
Aaron Baynes

vs

Chris Paul
Blake Griffin
DeAndre Jordan
Jamal Crawford
JJ Redick
Matt Barnes
Glen Davis
Hedo Turkoglu
Darren Collison
Danny Granger


Who's better?

Clue: 2nd team beat 1st team the in the 2014-2015 playoffs in the 1st round.
Clue 2: 1st team won the Finals the previous year.
All Stars / 6th man from 2014 are in bold.

[gambit1990]

All Stars / 6th man from 2014 are in bold.

Chris has had better teams than Tony has rung with.
that spurs team didn't ring.

[DMC]

that spurs team didn't ring.

Bullshit. They rang the previous year. Everyone on that team I listed.

http://i.cdn.turner.com/nba/nba/teamsites/images/legacy/spurs/140616_lead.jpg

[DMC]

All Stars / 6th man from 2014 are in bold.

And they didn't ring. Tony's team rang. You can credit Tony or not, I don't care. Chris had a better team and didn't ring.