FBI re-opens Hillary Email investigation

[pgardn]

^ case in point this useful idiot and the other minions who dont know the difference between collusion and standard journalism practice

tell me, 4chanityannex, what % of those names are on that list because they emailed someone with clinton to verify a quote?

The places that give the most accurate information through time will be the go to. Unless you want to be lied to. When something truly critical comes up and your, let's say, financial interests depend on the most accurate data and analysis of data, you will go to the trusted sites. And if you don't, you can lose your pants. (Or mind, or life, or family) TSA's will be weeded out. It'll take some time, but as you can see, the obvious is running quickly by him.

[Spurminator]

What exactly would you call Trump's propaganda outlets? Twitter?

The POTUS' two Twitter handles certainly qualify as propaganda channels. Do you disagree?

[DMC]

lol bitch even you said the dinner party wasnt your example of collusion



correct.



incorrect. no president or candidate in history, not even clinton, lied the way trump does. its not even close.

if clinton accused a prior president of wiretapping her youd drown in your own pizza flavored semen.

Clinton was a better liar. He's told some doozies. He's famous for lying. Same as his bull dyke wife.

[TSA]

The POTUS' two Twitter handles certainly qualify as propaganda channels. Do you disagree?

Yes I agree that is why I mentioned it. Besides Twitter though what are Trumps propaganda outlets?

[Spurminator]

Yes I agree that is why I mentioned it. Besides Twitter though what are Trumps propaganda outlets?

The practice of discrediting stories that are critical of the President, and diminishing trust in the channels that carry those stories, creates reliable propaganda outlets for the President.

And even if it doesn't, Twitter is certainly a strong enough channel on its own. The reach of a single Trump tweet is likely higher than any cable news program given his number of followers, the sharing of those tweets on Twitter and other social media, and the coverage of those tweets throughout the MSM.

[TSA]

The practice of discrediting stories that are critical of the President, and diminishing trust in the channels that carry those stories, creates reliable propaganda outlets for the President.

And even if it doesn't, Twitter is certainly a strong enough channel on its own. The reach of a single Trump tweet is likely higher than any cable news program given his number of followers, the sharing of those tweets on Twitter and other social media, and the coverage of those tweets throughout the MSM.

Besides his Twitter accounts, what are his other propaganda channels?

[Spurminator]

Besides his Twitter accounts, what are his other propaganda channels?


The practice of discrediting stories that are critical of the President, and diminishing trust in the channels that carry those stories, creates reliable propaganda outlets for the President.

Notice the future tense. He's been in office for two months.

You can figure out for yourself which news personalities / sites / networks are likely candidates.

[boutons_deux]

Besides his Twitter accounts, what are his other propaganda channels?

Fox & Friends on Comey Confirming Investigation of Trump’s Russian Ties: ‘You Didn’t Miss Much’

On Tuesday, Fox & Friends decided to summarize James Comey‘s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee by saying that the revelations that came out of it were hardly important.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/fox-friends-on-comey-confirming-investigation-of-trumps-russian-ties-you-didnt-miss-much/

[TSA]

Notice the future tense. He's been in office for two months.

You can figure out for yourself which news personalities / sites / networks are likely candidates.[/COLOR]

Which news personalities/sites/networks will be reliable propaganda outlets for him?

[Spurminator]

Which news personalities/sites/networks will be reliable propaganda outlets for him?

It could be any number of sympathetic news personalities or outlets. Maybe some we haven't heard of yet.

Not sure why you keep asking... It seems like you're trying to bait me into a tangential semantic debate on the journalistic merits of people like Sean Hannity, and I'm not really interested in that. It doesn't matter who I think will be Trump administration's propaganda outlet.

[TSA]

It could be any number of sympathetic news personalities or outlets. Maybe some we haven't heard of yet.

Not sure why you keep asking... It seems like you're trying to bait me into a tangential semantic debate on the journalistic merits of people like Sean Hannity, and I'm not really interested in that. It doesn't matter who I think will be Trump administration's propaganda outlet.

Not trying to bait you into anything I just don't see where the reliable propaganda outlets will be coming from besides his own Twitter accounts. Trump doesn't have the luxury of the MSM taking orders from him like Hillary did.

[Spurminator]

Not trying to bait you into anything I just don't see where the reliable propaganda outlets will be coming from besides his own Twitter accounts. Trump doesn't have the luxury of the MSM taking orders from him like Hillary did.

I'm sure if you think real hard you'll be able to imagine a world where specific news networks and personalities are overtly sympathetic towards conservative causes.

[TSA]

I'm sure if you think real hard you'll be able to imagine a world where specific news networks and personalities are overtly sympathetic towards conservative causes.

Sure. But you said reliable.

[Spurminator]

Sure. But you said reliable.

Reliable to Trump. As in, reliably willing to parrot whatever he wants.

[Winehole23]

Andrew McCarthy says the fix was in, but doesn't think Comey was the leaker:


Notwithstanding the president’s insistence that Comey leaked classified information, the known evidence strongly suggests that this is not the case. To be clear, there are significant problems with the former director’s account, but the claim that he committed a crime is specious.https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/04/comey-confirms-in-clinton-emails-caper-the-fix-was-in/

[boutons_deux]

Andrew McCarthy says the fix was in, but doesn't think Comey was the leaker:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/04/comey-confirms-in-clinton-emails-caper-the-fix-was-in/

wrong thread?

[Winehole23]

mmm, I can see that.

since when do you care about relevance, boutons?:p:

[Spurminator]

Not trying to bait you into anything I just don't see where the reliable propaganda outlets will be coming from besides his own Twitter accounts. Trump doesn't have the luxury of the MSM taking orders from him like Hillary did.


I'm sure if you think real hard you'll be able to imagine a world where specific news networks and personalities are overtly sympathetic towards conservative causes.


Sure. But you said reliable.


Reliable to Trump. As in, reliably willing to parrot whatever he wants.

Boy howdy...

[boutons_deux]

mmm, I can see that.

since when do you care about relevance, boutons?:p:

The Great Boutons doesn't care about relevance because The Great Boutons IS relevance

[Winehole23]

Boy howdy...The Washington Times, Breitbart, Fox and Friends and Sinclair either don't count, or weren't foreseeably in the tank.

[Spurminator]

The Washington Times, Breitbart, Fox and Friends and Sinclair either don't count, or weren't foreseeably in the tank.

By my count the list includes the following reliably shameless sycophants:

Hannity
Dobbs
Jeanine Pirro
Fox & Friends
Tucker Carlson
Sinclair
Breitbart
American Media, Inc.
Pastor Robert Jeffress
...and probably RT, but my exposure is limited.

[boutons_deux]

By my count the list includes the following reliably shameless sycophants:

Hannity
Dobbs
Jeanine Pirro
Fox & Friends
Tucker Carlson
Sinclair
Breitbart
American Media, Inc.
Pastor Robert Jeffress
...and probably RT, but my exposure is limited.

Billy Graham Jr and other leading evangelical grifters

[Spurtacular]

By my count the list includes the following reliably shameless sycophants:

Hannity
Dobbs
Jeanine Pirro
Fox & Friends
Tucker Carlson
Sinclair
Breitbart
American Media, Inc.
Pastor Robert Jeffress
...and probably RT, but my exposure is limited.

Are Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, and George Stephanopoulos sycophants? Just to name a few....

[Spurminator]

Are Anderson Cooper, Rachel Maddow, and George Stephanopoulos sycophants? Just to name a few....


Bias is to be expected, but still damages the credibility of a journalist or news source who shows bias. But blanketing all media as untrustworthy is lazy.

And it's especially dangerous if your solution is to, instead, only trust the word of the Executive and his propaganda outlets.

Welcome to the beginning of the conversation, DK. Now catch up.

[Spurtacular]

Welcome to the beginning of the conversation, DK. Now catch up.

So, the people who spout your beliefs aren't the sycophants. Nicely convenient for you.

[boutons_deux]

Cambridge Analytica had copies of Clinton emails one month before Wikileaks released them (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/6/21/1774270/-Cambridge-Analytica-had-copies-of-Clinton-emails-one-month-before-Wikileaks-released-them)

Ok, so what could be worse than at least three Trump advisors — George Papadopoulos, Carter Page and Don Jr. — all being told that Russia had illegally obtained information about Hillary Clinton before that information was released by Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0

but not any of them bothering to inform the FBI about this felony?

Or the fact that Jeff Sessions — who testified he didn’t know “any Trump surrogates who were in contact with the Russians” — had ordered Papadopoulos to “find out everything he could” about the emails the Russians stole? (https://thinkprogress.org/george-papadopoulos-new-claim-jeff-sessions-chicago-nightclub-da653988529c/)

Perhaps the fact that multiple Russians and their associates attempted to set up an (illegal) personal meeting between Trump and Putin before the election through various members of the campaign staff including Papadopoulos

(yes, him again via Sergei Millian after he was personally authorized to reach out to the Russians by Trump (http://www.newsweek.com/papadopoulos-says-trump-authorized-him-meet-foreign-leaders-714644)),

Don Jr. (via Alexander Torshin (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fbi-wiretaps-putin-ally-trump-jr_us_5b08bf56e4b0568a880b7859)),

Rhona Graff and

Steve Bannon (via Rob Goldstone and Emin Agalarov (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/revealed-man-set-trump-tower-meeting-russians-also-offered-trump-personal-rendezvous-putin/)),

Michael Cohen and

Ivanka Trump (via Russian Olympic Weight-lifter Dmitry Kolkov)? (https://www.buzzfeed.com/anthonycormier/ivanka-trump-putin-moscow-meeting-michael-cohen-tower?utm_term=.ym2P7zr2Y#.bw7LR5kGm)

Nope. That’s not bad enough.

It seems that Trump voter targeting and data operation,

which also happened to steal the personal data of 87 Million Americans (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/mark-zuckerberg-testify-congress.html) in order to discover how to effectively suppress the [Black] vote (https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/16/politics/cambridge-analytica-congress-wylie/index.html) in order to help Trump win —

also happened to have had copies of Hillary’s stolen emails for a month (https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/06/what-does-the-british-government-know-about-trump-and-russia/) before they were first released by Wikileaks.


Then there’s Cambridge Analytica.

The (now shuttered) British company did the Trump campaign’s data.

Its speciality was ‘microtargeting’: individual messages tailored to individual voters, delivered by email, Facebook and Twitter.

The US intelligence agencies believe that Russian internet ‘troll factories’ were also pushing out pro-Trump propaganda on social media:

sometimes fake news,
sometimes real news,
such as the hacked contents of Clinton’s emails.

The question is whether this was done in coordination with the Trump campaign.

An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election.

They had had the Clinton emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks:

‘What should I do?’

Take this to Mueller, the lawyer replied.


That particular story happens to point out that the British government hasn’t been cooperating with the Mueller investigation

in order to appease Trump on trade relations, although in the end, it doesn’t seem to be working.

So how might Britain be sucking up to Trump?

A Labour MP, Ben Bradshaw, thinks that the government has not always done all it can to assist the Mueller inquiry into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia.

Bradshaw was the minister in charge of the Secret Intelligence Service, known as MI6, and has doggedly pursued allegations about Russian meddling in other people’s elections.

‘I’m told that Mueller’s team were over here late last year and they weren’t happy with the level of cooperation they were getting,


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/6/21/1774270/-Cambridge-Analytica-had-copies-of-Clinton-emails-one-month-before-Wikileaks-released-them?detail=emaildkre

[Spurtacular]

This is totally political, of course.

10 Days out and you want to probe more into emails? LOL


:cry Why are they going after a felon? Unfair! :cry

:lmao Run-up to the 2016 Election's Tranny

[Reck]

Oh look, derp lusting and fake quoting.

[Spurtacular]

Oh look, derp lusting and fake quoting.

You still crusty about the FBI investigating your felon?

[Spurtacular]

Welcome to the beginning of the conversation, DK. Now catch up.


But blanketing all media as untrustworthy is lazy.

That's exactly what you've done with all the outlets that don't preach your worldview. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You still crusty about the FBI investigating your felon?What felonies?

Meltdown incoming.

[Spurtacular]

What felonies?

Meltdown incoming.

Why you to much of a pussy to start that thread?

[Pavlov]

Why you to much of a pussy to start that thread?You're too much of a pussy to ever list even one crime after incessantly bringing them up in multiple threads.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

You're too much of a pussy to ever list even one crime after incessantly bringing them up in multiple threads.

lol derp

How many threads do you have to cry about this in before you'll start a thread on it?

[Pavlov]

How many threads do you have to cry about this in before you'll start a thread on it?lol pussy conditions

You love talking about Hillary's crimes until someone asks you about them. Then you curl up into a ball and sob uncontrollably.

[Spurtacular]

lol pussy conditions

You love talking about Hillary's crimes until someone asks you about them. Then you curl up into a ball and sob uncontrollably.

Pussy actions.

Start a thread if this matters to you instead of regularly sabotaging threads

[Pavlov]

Pussy actions.

Start a thread if this matters to you instead of regularly sabotaging threadsThis is literally a thread about the FBI's investigating Hillary Clinton for potential crimes, derp.

[Spurtacular]

This is literally a thread about the FBI's investigating Hillary Clinton for potential crimes, derp.

It's literally about a closed investigation. If you want to specifically regard Hillary's crimes, then start a thread on it. You're scared that if you do that, you'll have to take a stance.

[Reck]

It's literally about a closed investigation. If you want to specifically regard Hillary's crimes, then start a thread on it. You're scared that if you do that, you'll have to take a stance.

So much drivel coming from you, derp.

Nothing is keeping you from posting about your claim on this thread. (The most appropiate thread for you to do so in fact)

[Spurtacular]

So much drivel coming from you, derp.

Nothing is keeping you from posting about your claim on this thread. (The most appropiate thread for you to do so in fact)

Why are you calling me out instead of the guy who won't start a thread on it?

Aw, that's cute; tranny slobbing chump's nob. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Why are you calling me out instead of the guy who won't start a thread on it?

Aw, that's cute; tranny slobbing chump's nob. :lmao:lol you're terrified.

You melt down every single time I ask.

[Spurtacular]

:lol you're terrified.

You melt down every single time I ask.

What is this about your 100th thread you've derailed? This is on you for not starting a thread. You want your distractions. This says everything about you, not me.

[Pavlov]

What is this about your 100th thread you've derailed? This is on you for not starting a thread. You want your distractions. This says everything about you, not me.Derailed?

This thread is literally about Hillary's alleged criminal behavior.

List what you think are her crimes.

[Spurtacular]

Derailed?

This thread is literally about Hillary's alleged criminal behavior.

List what you think are her crimes.

So, what crimes do you think Hillary committed, then?

[Pavlov]

So, what crimes do you think Hillary committed, then?You don't think she committed any.

OK. Thanks.

You failed to support your claim. Par.

[Mikeanaro]

So, what crimes do you think Hillary committed, then?
She looks a lot like George Liquor
https://the-hollywood-gossip-res.cloudinary.com/iu/s--pxgZJjNF--/t_xlarge_p/cs_srgb,f_auto,fl_strip_profile.lossy,q_auto:420/v1477706066/hillary-clinton-looks-weird.jpg http://statici.behindthevoiceactors.com/behindthevoiceactors/_img/chars/george-liquor-ren-and-stimpy-show-66.8.jpg

[Spurtacular]

You don't think she committed any.

OK. Thanks.

You failed to support your claim. Par.

What crimes do you say she committed, or are you sperm shielding again?

[Pavlov]

What crimes do you say she committed, or are you sperm shielding again?You made the claim.

List the crimes you claim she committed.

Step up or back down again.

[CosmicCowboy]

Some would say that deleting 30,000 emails and hiring a professional to bleach her hard drive after receiving a subpoena for the emails would qualify as obstruction of justice.

[Chris]

She was extremely careless. Can't be charged for carelessness. Gross negligence OTOH.

[Spurtacular]

You made the claim.

List the crimes you claim she committed.

Step up or back down again.

You made the claim that we should be discussing Hillary's crimes. Now you don't want to name them.

Step up or sperm shield again.

[Pavlov]

You made the claim that we should be discussing Hillary's crimes. Now you don't want to name them.

Step up or sperm shield again.You made the claim she is a felon. I made no claim.

List her felony crimes or back down again.

[Pavlov]

Some would say that deleting 30,000 emails and hiring a professional to bleach her hard drive after receiving a subpoena for the emails would qualify as obstruction of justice.Do you say that?

[CosmicCowboy]

Do you say that?

At the least I think it was incredible arrogance that probably cost her the presidency. In a similar situation a normal person not running for president would have probably been charged.

[CosmicCowboy]

The time line was clear. She received the subpoena on March 1 and had the emails and computer wiped three weeks later.

[Spurtacular]

You made the claim she is a felon. I made no claim.

List her felony crimes or back down again.

Well, make a claim. Has Hillary committed crimes or not?

[spurraider21]

oh look, derp cant name a single clinton crime

therefore he thinks she has no criminal history

sad!

[Spurtacular]

oh look, derp cant name a single clinton crime

therefore he thinks she has no criminal history

sad!

Go ahead and name her crimes. Still waiting for a chump or chumpette to do that. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Go ahead and name her crimes. Still waiting for a chump or chumpette to do that. :lmao
It's your claim, derp. We're waiting for you to back up your claim.

All you do is back down.

lol

[Pavlov]

At the least I think it was incredible arrogance that probably cost her the presidency. In a similar situation a normal person not running for president would have probably been charged.
There's nothing stopping the Dennison DOJ from prosecuting her.

[Spurtacular]

It's your claim, derp. We're waiting for you to back up your claim.

All you do is back down.

lol

You're the one leading the charge. Put your position, dude.

[Pavlov]

You're the one leading the charge. Put your position, dude. You're the one who made the claim, derp.

Back it up.

Name her felonies.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one who made the claim, derp.

Back it up.

Name her felonies.

Yea, you've made this point 509 times. Do you think 510 is the magic number? 550? 600?

You've been given terms for potential discussion and have instead decided that butt posting is the way to go.

Classic chump. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Yea, you've made this point 509 times. Do you think 510 is the magic number? 550? 600?

You've been given terms for potential discussion and have instead decided that butt posting is the way to go.

Classic chump. :lmaolol conditions

I terrify you every time you pop off about her crimes. You curl up into the fetal position and beg me to leave you alone.

Classic chickenshit derp.

lol

[CosmicCowboy]

There's nothing stopping the Dennison DOJ from prosecuting her.

Nice goal post move. Very chumpish.

[Spurtacular]

lol conditions

I terrify you every time you pop off about her crimes. You curl up into the fetal position and beg me to leave you alone.

Classic chickenshit derp.

lol

Yea, so terrified that I've consistently responded. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Nice goal post move. Very chumpish.

What goalpost? Given the behavior of previous secretaries of state, there was absolutely no way any prosecutor will touch this case.

[Pavlov]

Yea, so terrified that I've consistently responded. :lmao

You have never listed her crimes like any normal self respecting man would. You're hiding behind your demands and conditions.

What a pussy.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You have never listed her crimes like any normal self respecting man would. You're hiding behind your demands and conditions.

What a pussy.

lol

511.

Any more butt posting?

[Pavlov]

511.

Any more butt posting?Are you going to list the felonies you claim she committed?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Are you going to list the felonies you claim she committed?

Yes or no.

512.

Any more?

[spurraider21]

Go ahead and name her crimes. Still waiting for a chump or chumpette to do that. :lmao
im still waiting for a derp to do that :lmao

[Pavlov]

512.

Any more?
I'll take that as a no.

lol you can't back up you claims

lol "b*tt posting"

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

im still waiting for a derp to do that :lmao

I think you're the derp for the job. Or in the words of your chump, are you "too chickenshit"?

[Pavlov]

I think you're the derp for the job. Or in the words of your chump, are you "too chickenshit"?It's not his claim.

It's your claim.

Why do you think demanding others back up your claim is a winning tactic, derp?

[Spurtacular]

It's not his claim.

It's your claim.

Why do you think demanding others back up your claim is a winning tactic, derp?

514. But you're not pathetic, right?

:lmao

[Pavlov]

514. But you're not pathetic, right?

:lmaoYou're the one who shit your pants again.

Clean yourself up. You're going to get diaper rash.

[Spurtacular]

:cry I sperm shield for Hillary :cry

#StillWithHer

:lmao

[Pavlov]

lol quote change white flag.

I accept your white flag as long as you didn't soil it when you shit yourself this time.

[Spurtacular]

lol quote change white flag.

I accept your white flag as long as you didn't soil it when you shit yourself this time.

I accept that you're still with her. :lmao

[Reck]

I accept that you're still with her. :lmao

Says the trumptard.

Irony is ever lost on you, derp.

[Spurtacular]

Says the trumptard.

Irony is ever lost on you, derp.

This stuff undoubtedly passes for witty banter at your tranny parlours. :lol

[spurraider21]

:lmao spurtacular still white knighting hillary
:lmao wont name any of her crimes
:cry #StillWithHer

[Pavlov]

:lmao spurtacular still white knighting hillary
:lmao wont name any of her crimes
:cry #StillWithHerYep, by his definition he has and will forever semen shield for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Yep, by his definition he has and will forever semen shield for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

lol

There you go again stating your definition. You're Hillary's biggest semen shield by your own definition. :lmao

[spurraider21]

There you go again stating your definition. You're Hillary's biggest semen shield by your own definition. :lmao
:lmao spurtacular is :cry StillWithHer
:lmao cant even name a single clinton crime

[Spurtacular]

:lmao spurtacular is :cry StillWithHer
:lmao cant even name a single clinton crime

Bro, coming after me is dumb when I've already gave him terms. But if you want to support his spamming, then try to pile on. Fact is your boy has repeatedly given and fulfilled his definition of semen shielding for Hillary. That's not the kind of company I'd want to keep.

:rollin

[Pavlov]

:lmao spurtacular is :cry StillWithHer
:lmao cant even name a single clinton crimeYep, little bitch is trying to cry about muh terms and muh conditions but still won't name one crime Hillary Rodham Clinton committed.

Derp is 100% semen shielding for her and he can't deny it.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, little bitch is trying to cry about muh terms and muh conditions but still won't name one crime Hillary Rodham Clinton committed.

Derp is 100% semen shielding for her and he can't deny it.

I cry about nothing. You're free to butt post all you want; and in fact that is all you'll do. :lmao

[Pavlov]

I cry about nothing. You're free to butt post all you want; and in fact that is all you'll do. :lmaoYou're shitting your pants and crying right now,

You have never named one (1) felony you explicitly claimed Hillary Rodham Clinton committed and you never will.

Instead, you shit your pants and cry about muh conditions and muh terms.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You're shitting your pants and crying right now,

You have never named one (1) felony you explicitly claimed Hillary Rodham Clinton committed and you never will.

Instead, you shit your pants and cry about muh conditions and muh terms.

lol

Blather. You're Hillary's sperm shield. Come to terms.

[Pavlov]

You have never named one (1) felony you explicitly claimed Hillary Rodham Clinton committed and you never will.

Instead, you shit your pants and cry about muh conditions and muh terms.

lol


Come to terms.:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

Muh terms!

You have never listed one (1) felony you claimed Hillary Rodham Clinton committed and you never will.

Now cry some more.

[Spurtacular]

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

Muh terms!

You have never listed one (1) felony you claimed Hillary Rodham Clinton committed and you never will.

Now cry some more.

And for this you need to post for three pages in every thread.

:lmao Rent free

[Pavlov]

And for this you need to post for three pages in every thread.

:lmao Rent freeI just make you shit your pants every time you try to bring this up.

Seriously, why are you so afraid to discuss what you claim to be Hillary Rodham Clinton's felonies immediately after you bring them up?

Why do you choose to shit yourself every single time?

[Spurtacular]

I just make you shit your pants every time you try to bring this up.

Seriously, why are you so afraid to discuss what you claim to be Hillary Rodham Clinton's felonies immediately after you bring them up?

Why do you choose to shit yourself every single time?

Three pages for every thread. Sad but par.

[spurraider21]

Bro, coming after me is dumb when I've already gave him terms. But if you want to support his spamming, then try to pile on. Fact is your boy has repeatedly given and fulfilled his definition of semen shielding for Hillary. That's not the kind of company I'd want to keep.

:rollin
You’re #StillWithHer :lmao

[Spurtacular]

You’re #StillWithHer :lmao

That supposed to bother me? I was hating Hillary before it was cool. Hell, before it was even much of a thing. You're gonna have to try harder, dude.

[spurraider21]

That supposed to bother me? I was hating Hillary before it was cool. Hell, before it was even much of a thing. You're gonna have to try harder, dude.
Then why do you keep defending her by telling us she has never committed a crime?

[Spurtacular]

Then why do you keep defending her by telling us she has never committed a crime?

Tell me what's wrong with that or admit you're a terrible lawyer.

[spurraider21]

Tell me what's wrong with that or admit you're a terrible lawyer.
Nothing’s wrong with it at all. You’re allowed to semen shield Hillary and be #StillWithHer

[Pavlov]

Tell me what's wrong with that or admit you're a terrible lawyer.There's nothing wrong with your admitting Hillary Rodham Clinton never committed a felony.

You came to terms.

Congratulations.:tu

[Spurtacular]

There's nothing wrong with your admitting Hillary Rodham Clinton never committed a felony.



Said her biggest sperm shielder!

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

[Spurtacular]

Nothing’s wrong with it at all. You’re allowed to semen shield Hillary and be #StillWithHer

Okay, terrible lawyer; I never said Hillary hasn't committed crimes.

[Pavlov]

Said her biggest sperm shielder!

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollinSaid the pussy who refuses to list the felonies he claims she committed!

Why are you protecting her?

:rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin :rollin

[Spurtacular]

Said the pussy who refuses to list her claimed felonies.

Why are you protecting her?



https://target.scene7.com/is/image/Target/50302622?wid=488&hei=488&fmt=pjpeg

[Pavlov]

https://target.scene7.com/is/image/Target/50302622?wid=488&hei=488&fmt=pjpegIt's your claim.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[Spurtacular]

It's your claim.

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

All those emojis ain't changing that you've reaffirmed your Hillary's biggest sperm shield.

/chump

[Pavlov]

All those emojis ain't changing that you've reaffirmed your Hillary's biggest sperm shield.

/chumpYou're the one who refuses to list even one (1) felony she committed.

You prefer to shit your pants every time.

You want to shit your pants.

You're a shitpants masochist.

I'll ease up on the emojis because I know they hurt you.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Some would say that deleting 30,000 emails and hiring a professional to bleach her hard drive after receiving a subpoena for the emails would qualify as obstruction of justice.


Do you say that?


At the least I think it was incredible arrogance that probably cost her the presidency. In a similar situation a normal person not running for president would have probably been charged.


The time line was clear. She received the subpoena on March 1 and had the emails and computer wiped three weeks later.


There's nothing stopping the Dennison DOJ from prosecuting her.


Nice goal post move. Very chumpish.


What goalpost? Given the behavior of previous secretaries of state, there was absolutely no way any prosecutor will touch this case.

:lmao Yup. Go into the weeds with chump and he'll semen shield for her. Ironically, he's just begging for these scenarios to semen shield for her.
:lmao True cuck.

[Reck]

You're embarrassing yourself-----errr more than usual I mean.

[spurraider21]

Okay, terrible lawyer; I never said Hillary hasn't committed crimes.
Of course you have. You’ve never stated a single crime she’s committed.

[CosmicCowboy]

Chumps definitely with Her. Pretending previous secretaries of state defied subpoenas and destroyed evidence. Smh

[Reck]

Chumps definitely with Her. Pretending previous secretaries of state defied subpoenas and destroyed evidence. Smh

Are you still pretending you’re not a trumpie? You’re the last one who should be pointing fingers here.

[Pavlov]

Chumps definitely with Her. Pretending previous secretaries of state defied subpoenas and destroyed evidence. SmhThere's no proof it was evidence. The subpoena was for relevant emails. The ones her people deleted were claimed to be personal.

If you want to tell everyone what you think she's hiding about Benghazi, you go right ahead.

[CosmicCowboy]

There's no proof it was evidence. The subpoena was for relevant emails. The ones her people deleted were claimed to be personal.

If you want to tell everyone what you think she's hiding about Benghazi, you go right ahead.
We will never know, will we? They were intentionally destroyed.

[Pavlov]

We will never know, will we? They were intentionally destroyed.Exactly. So where's the obstruction case against Clinton?

[CosmicCowboy]

Exactly. So where's the obstruction case against Clinton?

The very act of destroying them in defiance of the subpoena. If Trump did something similar you would totally wig out.

[CosmicCowboy]

It cost her the presidency. Im ok with not prosecuting her. Its more fun watching her pathetic book tour.

[Pavlov]

The very act of destroying them in defiance of the subpoena. If Trump did something similar you would totally wig out.I'm trying to figure out how you concluded the House Benghazi investigation was a criminal justice matter.

Help me out here, CC.

[CosmicCowboy]

I'm trying to figure out how you concluded the House Benghazi investigation was a criminal justice matter.

Help me out here, CC.
Nice straw man chump. It is irrelevant if the house investigation was a "criminal matter". She destroyed evidence in defiance of a legally issued subpoena. Do you deny this?

[monosylab1k]

Are you still pretending you’re not a trumpie? You’re the last one who should be pointing fingers here.

:lmao Grandpa conveniently ignoring this post.

[Pavlov]

Nice straw man chump. It is irrelevant if the house investigation was a "criminal matter". She destroyed evidence in defiance of a legally issued subpoena. Do you deny this?There is a statute that applies to obstruction of congressional proceedings, but again -- you have to prove the destroyed emails were actually evidence that was subpoenaed and that she knew they were relevant to the investigation. They didn't demand every single email so they could rummage through them all and decide what was relevant to their investigation; rather the subpoena was for emails relevant to the Benghazi investigation. They left the sorting up to her, which she delegated to others.

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao Grandpa conveniently ignoring this post.

You are irrelevant static.

[Pavlov]

If this group of lawyers was really incredibly concerned about Clinton's deleting emails in her possession, they should've done something like subpoena the entire server and have some special master do the sorting like happened in the Cohen investigation.

They left it up to Clinton.

[CosmicCowboy]

If this group of lawyers was really incredibly concerned about Clinton's deleting emails in her possession, they should've done something like subpoena the entire server and have some special master do the sorting like happened in the Cohen investigation.

They left it up to Clinton.

True. They trusted her to turn over the emails and she gave them the big "fuck you" by deleting and bleaching.

[Chris]

Pavlov saying they should have done this and that when the entire FBI and DOJ was in the tank to get her off the hook. My God, you are oblivious to facts.

[Pavlov]

True. They trusted her to turn over the emails and she gave the the big "fuck you" by deleting and bleaching.:lol she turned over 30000 emails to the government. Doesn't fit your narrative though.

[Pavlov]

Pavlov saying they should have done this and that when the entire FBI and DOJ was in the tank to get her off the hook. My God, you are oblivious to facts.The Trump DOJ is free to prosecute her at any time. That's a fact.

[Chris]

The Trump DOJ is free to prosecute her at any time. That's a fact.

That's actually an opinion.

[monosylab1k]

You are irrelevant static.

And you & your saggy ballsack love Trump.

[Pavlov]

That's actually an opinion.Oh? What is your opinion on the Trump DOJ's ability to prosecute Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chris?

[Chris]

Oh?

Yeah.

[Pavlov]

Yeah.Then what is your opinion on the Trump DOJ's ability to prosecute Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chris?

[Chris]

Then what is your opinion on the Trump DOJ's ability to prosecute Hillary Rodham Clinton, Chris?

I don't have an opinion on that.

[Winehole23]

Chris contends that the DOJ and the FBI are wholly owned subsidiaries of HRC.

[Pavlov]

I don't have an opinion on that.Then what are you saying could prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

[Chris]

Then what are you saying could prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

I'm not arguing that. Do you think prosecution should come before or after investigations?

[Pavlov]

I'm not arguing that. Do you think prosecution should come before or after investigations?So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

Use your words and actually answer.

[Chris]

So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

Use your words and actually answer.

Question pending.

[Pavlov]

Question pending.After.

So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

[Chris]

After.

So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

Are you aware there are investigations taking place right now?

[Pavlov]

Are you aware there are investigations taking place right now?Question pending:

So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

[Chris]

Question pending:

So there's actually nothing preventing the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?


Maybe.

Do you think Clinton should be prosecuted before the investigation is over - yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Maybe.

Do you think Clinton should be prosecuted before the investigation is over - yes or no?No.

Since you said something may prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find-- what are you saying could actually prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

[Chris]

No.

Since you said something may prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find-- what are you saying could actually prevent the Trump DOJ from prosecuting Clinton for some felony they theoretically find, Chris?

Theoretically a statute of limitations. So you agree that investigations are tantamount to a prosecution...Why would you push for prosecution right now?

[Pavlov]

Theoretically a statute of limitations.Statue of limitations on what?


So you agree that investigations are tantamount to a prosecution.No.

[Chris]

Statue of limitations on what?

On the event.

Why would you push for prosecution right now before the investigation is over?

[Pavlov]

On the event.What event?


Why would you push for prosecution right now before the investigation is over?I wouldn't.

[Chris]

What event?

Whatever your purported felony is Pavlov.


I wouldn't.

Then what are rambling about?

[Pavlov]

Whatever your purported felony is Pavlov.For what potential crimes are you saying she is being investigated?


Then what are rambling about?Not rambling at all. I've been perfectly clear. You're the one who thinks investigations and prosecutions are the same thing and that India isn't in Asia.

[Chris]

For what potential crimes are you saying she is being investigated?

You were the one who made the statement about alleged felonies. I can't tie your shoes for you Pavlov. Man up and clarify your shit.


Not rambling at all. I've been perfectly clear. You're the one who thinks investigations and prosecutions are the same thing and that India isn't in Asia.

Back to the trolling thing again. I don't blame you.

[Pavlov]

You were the one who made the statement about alleged felonies. I can't tie your shoes for you Pavlov. Man up and clarify your shit.You're the one saying she's being investigated right now. Man up and say what crimes are being investigated.


Back to the trolling thing again. I don't blame you.I don't blame you for trying to pretend you didn't say these things. They were incredibly stupid.

[Chris]

You're the one saying she's being investigated right now.

Are you disputing the fact that she's being investigated? I noticed you didn't clarify anything. (typical troll shit)

[Pavlov]

Are you disputing the fact that she's being investigated? I noticed you didn't clarify anything. (typical troll shit)All I've seen is some kind of "review" and some Arkansas field agents asking questions about the foundation months ago.

I noticed you didn't say what the investigation is.

What is being actively investigated now, Chris?

[Chris]

All I've seen is some kind of "review" and some Arkansas field agents asking questions about the foundation months ago.

Are you disputing the fact that she's being investigated - yes or no?


I noticed you didn't say what the investigation is.

What is being actively investigated now, Chris?

Question pending.

[Pavlov]

Are you disputing the fact that she's being investigated - yes or no?I honestly don't know of any active investigation.


What is being actively investigated now, Chris?

[Chris]

I honestly don't know of any active investigation.

Not surprised at all tbh.



What is being actively investigated now, Chris?

Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation. You're looking for details and quotes? Sessions doesn't leak.

[Pavlov]

Not surprised at all tbh.




Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation. You're looking for details and quotes? Sessions doesn't leak.No I'm looking for proof there is an active investigation into each.

Do you have that proof, Chris?

[Chris]

No I'm looking for proof there is an active investigation into each.

Do you have that proof, Chris?

Sure, no problem Pavlov.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/13/us/politics/document-Special-Counsel-Department-of-Justice.html

[Chris]

4th paragraph; 1st sentence: what does the letter say?

[Pavlov]

Sure, no problem Pavlov.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/13/us/politics/document-Special-Counsel-Department-of-Justice.html


4th paragraph; 1st sentence: what does the letter say?It says you have no proof there is an active investigation, Chris.

lol

[Chris]

1010940995222073352
1010942611677483009
1010943834086395906
1010944504797585413
1010945207796420608
1010945861013135364
1010946276014415873
1010948132258099209
1010949262560169989

[Spurtacular]

Of course you have. You’ve never stated a single crime she’s committed.

I don't believe that's true; but yea I've followed a standard of not going into the weeds with chump. He still throws a tantrum every time, apparently supported by you. :lol

[Pavlov]

I don't believe that's true; but yea I've followed a standard of not going into the weeds with chump. He still throws a tantrum every time, apparently supported by you. :lolNope you never named one.

Now cry about it.

[Spurtacular]

Nope you never named one.

Now cry about it.

It's not even worth my time showing you you're wrong. You'll still be throwing tantrums at the end of the day.

[Pavlov]

It's not even worth my time showing you you're wrong. You'll still be throwing tantrums at the end of the day.
You'd rather shit your pants again.

You're consistent, I'll give you that.

[Spurtacular]

You'd rather shit your pants again.

You're consistent, I'll give you that.

Yea, just like that. Your tantrums never end. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Yea, just like that. Your tantrums never end. :lmao

Yeah, just like that. You never stop shitting your pants.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Yeah, just like that. You never stop shitting your pants.

lol

Cry all you want. I gave you a real answer on why doing jack shit for you is pointless. I feel bad for the people that have to suffer you in real life. Hopefully, this is just a message board persona.

[Pavlov]

Cry all you want. I gave you a real answer on why doing jack shit for you is pointless. I feel bad for the people that have to suffer you in real life. Hopefully, this is just a message board persona.People in real life answer simple questions and don't shit their pants whenever I ask them.

You actively want to shit your pants.

lol

[Spurtacular]

People in real life answer simple questions and don't shit their pants whenever I ask them.

You actively want to shit your pants.

lol

Bla bla

More cheap come-ons.

[Pavlov]

Bla bla

More cheap come-ons.It's a simple statement.

No one told you to keep shitting your pants, but here you are.

[Spurtacular]

It's a simple statement.

No one told you to keep shitting your pants, but here you are.

:lol You can't stop your tantrum.

[Pavlov]

:lol You can't stop your tantrum.I made a statement.

You'll never stop shitting your pants over it.

Hold det grudge forever. Start another grudge thread. That'll show me.

[Spurtacular]

I made a statement.

You'll never stop shitting your pants over it.

Hold det grudge forever. Start another grudge thread. That'll show me.

:lol Tantrum still going...

No grudge; you're allowed to sperm shield for Hillary.

[Pavlov]

:lol Tantrum still going...

No grudge; you're allowed to sperm shield for Hillary.Yep, you'll never stop shitting your pants over that one and you'll never ever ever even try to name one crime you think she committed.

You may now shit yourself all over again. Go right ahead.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, you'll never stop shitting your pants over that one and you'll never ever ever even try to name one crime you think she committed.

You may now shit yourself all over again. Go right ahead.

And you need to make this claim for the eighth time in a row for why?

:lmao Tantrum mode

[Pavlov]

And you need to make this claim for the eighth time in a row for why?

:lmao Tantrum modeBecause you are guaranteed to shit your pants about it ever time like you did right there.

If it hurts you too much, just ask me to take it easier on you.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Because you are guaranteed to shit your pants about it ever time like you did right there.

If it hurts you too much, just ask me to take it easier on you.

lol

Chumpbot broke. :lol

[spurraider21]

I don't believe that's true; but yea I've followed a standard of not going into the weeds with chump. He still throws a tantrum every time, apparently supported by you. :lol
fine. set the record straight. tell us a hillary clinton crime. or keep defending her and acting like she never committed one

[Spurtacular]

fine. set the record straight. tell us a hillary clinton crime. or keep defending her and acting like she never committed one

If you're worried about the record, you can go find some posts. But I've told chump I'm not going into the weeds with him; and by extension I'm not doing that with his surrogates either. Also, I've obviously never defended Hillary. Cheap come-ons? You really are slurping chump's juices, aren't you? :lmao

[spurraider21]

If you're worried about the record, you can go find some posts. But I've told chump I'm not going into the weeds with him; and by extension I'm not doing that with his surrogates either. Also, I've obviously never defended Hillary. Cheap come-ons? You really are slurping chump's juices, aren't you? :lmao
look, you're deflecting so you can consider your stealth clinton defending :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lol always bringing up Hillary's crimes. Always shitting his pants when called on it.

[TSA]

1010945207796420608

[Pavlov]

1010945207796420608

What is the conspiracy theory today, TSA?

[Spurtacular]

look, you're deflecting so you can consider your stealth clinton defending :lmao

Cheap come-ons ain't gonna work.

[Pavlov]

Cheap come-ons ain't gonna work.

It's not a come on. We know you will never ever actually name a Clinton crime. You are too afraid and stupid. Come to terms and just shut up about it.

[Spurtacular]

It's not a come on. We know you will never ever actually name a Clinton crime. You are too afraid and stupid. Come to terms and just shut up about it.

Even if that were true, it'd still be better than your self-admitted reason of sperm shielding for her. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Even if that were true, it'd still be better than your self-admitted reason of sperm shielding for her. :lmao:lol that's your reason -- I just turned it on you.

You keep semen shielding for Hillary by your own definition. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lol that's your reason -- I just turned it on you.

You keep semen shielding for Hillary by your own definition. :lmao

It's your clear-cut reason regardless of specific assignation.

:lmao :lmao :lmao And you've decided to sperm shield hardcore for her by your own standard :lmao :lmao :lmao

[Reck]

It's not a come on. We know you will never ever actually name a Clinton crime. You are too afraid and stupid. Come to terms and just shut up about it.

Dude's so thirsty. Using cheap flirty words like come-ons to egg on dudes on a random online board. :lol

[Pavlov]

It's your clear-cut reason regardless of specific assignation.

:lmao :lmao :lmao And you've decided to sperm shield hardcore by your own standard :lmao :lmao :lmao:lol it's your standard. You admit to semen shielding for Hillary Clinton by your own standard.

[Pavlov]

Dude's so thirsty. Using cheap flirty words like come-ons to egg on dudes on a random online board. :lol:lol He must have cried out for you ten times this weekend. Incels will settle for any kind of attention.

[Spurtacular]

:lol it's your standard. You admit to semen shielding for Hillary Clinton by your own standard.

You pathological as fuck, bruh. I've shown you your quotes many times now.

[Pavlov]

You pathological as fuck, bruh. I've shown you your quotes many times now.I turned your standard on you. You admit to semen shielding for Hillary Rodhman Clinton by your own standard.

lol

[spurraider21]

derp can end this all anytime he wants just by naming a single crime, but instead elects to defend clinton tooth and nail

[Pavlov]

derp can end this all anytime he wants just by naming a single crime, but instead elects to defend clinton tooth and nailYep, derp is THE #1 semen shielder for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I considered and discussed some obstruction of Congressional operations charge just yesterday. Derp will never even get that far.

It's admirable how completely and loyally derp defends her.

[Spurtacular]

chump can end this all anytime he wants just by naming a single crime, but instead elects to defend clinton tooth and nail

FIFY

[Spurtacular]

Yep, I'm THE #1 semen shielder for Hillary Rodham Clinton.



FIFY, too. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Derp throws up consecutive fake quote white flags.

We accept.

[Spurtacular]

Derp throws up consecutive fake quote white flags.

We accept.

:lmao Pathological chump worried about "fake".

[Pavlov]

:lmao Pathological chump worried about "fake".After surrendering, derp tries repeating his new buzzword after being called out for using the old ones.

And still won't name a crime, defending Hillary Rodham Clinton to the death.

It's astounding what a huge influence we have on you.

lol

[Spurminator]

derp can end this all anytime he wants just by naming a single crime, but instead elects to defend clinton tooth and nail

He doesn't want it to end. He likes having someone to talk to.

He needs a therapist.

[CosmicCowboy]

Yep, derp is THE #1 semen shielder for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I considered and discussed some obstruction of Congressional operations charge just yesterday. Derp will never even get that far.

It's admirable how completely and loyally derp defends her.

"Obstruction of congressional operation" lmao

Chump you crack me up.

It was a fucking subpoena amd she destroyed evidence.

Her arrogance cost her the presidency.

I dont want her to go to jail.

Living with the humiliation of having her fat ass whipped by Donald J fucking Trump is punishment enough lolol.

[dabom]

"Obstruction of congressional operation" lmao

Chump you crack me up.

It was a fucking subpoena amd she destroyed evidence.

Her arrogance cost her the presidency.

I dont want her to go to jail.

Living with the humiliation of having her fat ass whipped by Donald J fucking Trump is punishment enough lolol.

Destroying evidence. :lmao

Why doesn't like the 20 republican investigations ever find anything like that? :lmao

[spurraider21]

"Obstruction of congressional operation" lmao

Chump you crack me up.

It was a fucking subpoena amd she destroyed evidence.

Her arrogance cost her the presidency.

I dont want her to go to jail.

Living with the humiliation of having her fat ass whipped by Donald J fucking Trump is punishment enough lolol.
:lol go back and read the dicussion that lasted until page 30

you piped up after poste 878

[CosmicCowboy]

Destroying evidence. :lmao

Why doesn't like the 20 republican investigations ever find anything like that? :lmao

Uhhh because it was destroyed? Bleach bit hard drive 20 days after the subpoena?

[dabom]

Uhhh because it was destroyed? Bleach bit hard drive 20 days after the subpoena?

Hillary you dumb fuck. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

I dont want her locked up.

Its too much fun watching her wallow in her humiliation.

[Pavlov]

"Obstruction of congressional operation" lmao

Chump you crack me up.

It was a fucking subpoena amd she destroyed evidence.That's what she would've been obstructing, CC.

I didn't write the laws.

Again, you simply have no proof she destroyed anything they asked for.

[CosmicCowboy]

That's what she would've been obstructing, CC.

I didn't write the laws.

Again, you simply have no proof she destroyed anything they asked for.
Lol the whole point of the bleach bit. Duh.

[dabom]

So no nothing huh? :lol

Been played out for years now and can't come up with anything over like 20 investigations. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

And I will ask you a direct question Chump. Why hire a professional to destroy the contents of her hard drive immediately after the subpoena if she had nothing to hide?

[dabom]

At least make some fucking sense next time. :lmao

[Reck]

I dont want her locked up.

Clearly.

[CosmicCowboy]

Seriously. I enjoy her "what the fuck happened?" Book tour.

[dabom]

Hillary has fucked all of ya repugs in the head already. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

Hillary has fucked all of ya repugs in the head already. :lmao

Delusional.

[Chris]

1011377012773212160

[CosmicCowboy]

Glad you're with her.

[dabom]

Delusional.

:lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao

Another profound response from the peanut gallery. You should take your weakass game back to the club where you belong.

[dabom]

Another profound response from the peanut gallery. You should take your weakass game back to the club where you belong.

You were found wanting today, faggot. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

You were found wanting today, faggot. :lmao

You arent even making sense. You should really get back on the porch and leave the bigdogs alone.

[dabom]

You arent even making sense. You should really get back on the porch and leave the bigdogs alone.

The fact that you don't understand what I said shows your lack of intelligence. :lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

The fact that you don't understand what I said shows your lack of intelligence. :lmao
What was your profound point again? All I saw was emojis and bullshit.

[dabom]

What was your profound point again? All I saw was emojis and bullshit.

I ain't here to teach. We can point and laugh though. :lol

[Winehole23]

So no nothing huh? :lol

Been played out for years now and can't come up with anything over like 20 investigations. :lmaoTHERE NEEDS TO BE A NEW INVESTIGATION










...turn those machines back on!

[dabom]

Some posters you don't go at. You learned your lesson though.

[CosmicCowboy]

You really should let Chump do the talking. You are an embarrasment to "her" team, emoji boy.

[dabom]

Look brah. You got whipped. It's cool.

[CosmicCowboy]

I dont need any more investigations. I am perfectly happy watching Hillary wallow in her humiliation of being beaten by a buffoon.

[AaronY]

excellent debate

[Chris]

dabom doesn't debate, he starts "retirement threads" :lol

[dabom]

dabom doesn't debate, he starts "retirement threads" :lol

Just put your boy out to pasture. :tu

[CosmicCowboy]

Dabom very much reminds me of Trump. Vomits out some irrational bullshit and then declares victory.

[Pavlov]

And I will ask you a direct question Chump. Why hire a professional to destroy the contents of her hard drive immediately after the subpoena if she had nothing to hide?Of course she wanted her personal emails scrubbed.

Duh.

[CosmicCowboy]

Of course she wanted he personal emails scrubbed.

Duh.

Lol. Still with her. Thats sweet.

[Pavlov]

Lol. Still with her. Thats sweet.
Why is that answer unsatisfactory for you?

Explain.

[TSA]

Of course she wanted her personal emails scrubbed.

Duh.

You are all in lol

[CosmicCowboy]

Why is that answer unsatisfactory for you?

Explain.

Very trusting chump. Im sure saint hillary wasnt trying to destroy any evidence by bleach bitting her server.

[dabom]

CC still reeling. :lol

[Pavlov]

You are all in lol


Very trusting chump. Im sure saint hillary wasnt trying to destroy any evidence by bleach bitting her server.
Great, what evidence are each of you saying she is hiding?

Be specific.

[CosmicCowboy]

The hilarious irony is that it cost her the presidency. Beat by freaking Trump lolololol. The humiliation is its own punishment.

[dabom]

Got smacked around and is forced to talk shit about hillary like anyone gives a shit. :lol

So sad. :lol

[Pavlov]

Got smacked around and is forced to talk shit about hillary like anyone gives a shit. :lol

So sad. :lol:lol I even looked up the charge CC wants to slap on her and he says it doesn't exist.

[Chris]

Damn son

1011423708651687936

[Reck]

Damn son

1011423708651687936

Good.

Assange is on the run because he’s too much of a pussy of facing the music. Why would anyone want to bail him out?

Does cheerleading for bad guys come natural to you, Chrissy?

[spurraider21]

Immunity deals good now

[Chucho]

Good.

Assange is on the run because he’s too much of a pussy of facing the music. Why would anyone want to bail him out?

Does cheerleading for bad guys come natural to you, Chrissy?

Why's he a bad guy?