#NBArank: Players Nos. 101-150

[SASdynasty!]

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/nbarank101150/nbarank-players-101-150

Simmons: 107
Parker: 113
Mills: 115

Lol, Spurstalk thinking Mills and Manu are better than Parker.

[mods change TT...edit, THX!]

[TheDoctor]

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/nbarank101150/nbarank-players-101-150

Simmons: 107
Parker: 113
Mills: 115

Lol, Spurstalk thinking Mills and Manu are better than Parker.

[mods change TT]

Tony, you suxs at starting threads and games. Go eat something. Go, go.

[dabom]

Tony, you suxs at starting threads and games. Go eat something. Go, go.
:lol

[SASdynasty!]

So not only is Tony still a better PG than Mills (according to PATFO) but he's also considered a better player overall by outside sources. Seems like the Krew is on their own on this one again.

And that's even considering Parker is off to his worst start ever after 5 games, something that will obviously turn around. Either the rest of the world understands this (unlike the Krew) or they think that even if Parker continues to play this bad, he's still a better option than Mills. Haha wow!

[gambit1990]

Simmons: 107
Parker: 113
Mills: 115

makes a thread because parker came out 2 spots ahead of patty... while simmons came out 6 spots ahead of parker :lol

[SASdynasty!]

makes a thread because parker came out 2 spots ahead of patty... while simmons came out 6 spots ahead of parker :lol
Simmons is balling this year...no shame in that. Perfect game against the Dubs, so I can understand the overreaction. I just am glad to continue to see Parker ahead of Manu on every list for the past 5+ years. Sometimes being in this forum makes me think that maybe Manu is better than Parker, but then when I see actual analysts (who get paid for a living) externally continue to rank Parker over Manu (and Mills obviously), even after Parker's worst start ever, it's nice to know I'm not delusional.

[gambit1990]

Simmons is balling this year...no shame in that. Perfect game against the Dubs, so I can understand the overreaction. I just am glad to continue to see Parker ahead of Manu on every list for the past 5+ years. Sometimes being in this forum makes me think that maybe Manu is better than Parker, but then when I see actual analysts (who get paid for a living) externally continue to rank Parker over Manu (and Mills obviously), even after Parker's worst start ever, it's nice to know I'm not delusional.
so you believe in analysts, just not analytics :lol

[SD126]

OP is a brain-fried idiot using ESPN's rankings as grounds to justify Porker. Leave that to brain dead idiots at the four letter network and come up with something better.

NEXT....

[SASdynasty!]

so you believe in analysts, just not analytics :lol
Well, analysts actually know how to use analytics, which is why they still rank Parker higher.

[SASdynasty!]

OP is a brain-fried idiot using ESPN's rankings as grounds to justify Porker. Leave that to brain dead idiots at the four letter network and come up with something better.

NEXT....
I'll side with PATFO, NBA analysts who make a living doing this, and coaches around the league (who voted Parker as the Spurs only All-Star in 2014) over the loud voices on this forum.

[Kawhitstorm]

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/nbarank101150/nbarank-players-101-150

Simmons: 107
Parker: 113
Mills: 115



Simmons must be the most overrated player in the league, basically rated as a top 100 player.:lmao

Fat Head is probably top 50::lol