PDA

View Full Version : 2016-2017 SPURS Game Grades Averages



TheDoctor
12-07-2016, 06:40 PM
Methodology:
1) Write down the given grade in each game for each player.
2) Assign a value to the grade based on the following made-up scale:



A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F


6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0


3) Average the grades values after 10 games.


RESULTS FOR GAMES 1-10:



GAMES PLAYED
PLAYER

G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
G7
G8
G9
G10
GRADE AVG


2
Danny Green

DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
5
DNP
4
4.5


10
Kawhi Leonard

6
5.5
4.5
6
4
5.5
1
4
2.5
4
4.3


10
Patty Mills

5.5
2.5
5
5
2
5
0.5
5
5.5
4
4.0


10
David Lee

4.5
4.5
4
4
1.5
2.5
3
5
3
4
3.6


9
Manu Ginobili

5
4.5
DNP
2.5
1
4
0.5
3
5
6
3.5


6
Tony Parker

3.5
1
DNP
4
4.5
DNP
DNP
DNP
2.5
5.5
3.5


10
Jonathon Simmons

5.5
2
3.5
3.5
2
3
0.5
5.5
3
5.5
3.4


10
Pau Gasol

0.5
0.5
4.5
5
3.5
4
2
0
6
5
3.1


9
LaMarcus Aldridge

5.5
2.5
3
DNP
3
3.5
2
1
3
3.5
3.0


10
Dewayne Dedmon

3.5
5.5
4
4
2
5.5
2.5
0
2.5
0
3.0


9
Kyle Anderson

2
4
3
3
0
0
0.5
2.5
5.5
DNP
2.3


6
Davis Bertans

DNP
DNP
3
4
DNP
4
1
0.5
0
DNP
2.1


6
Nico Laprovittola

DNP
DNP
DNP
4
0
0
4.5
3.5
0
DNP
2.0


7
Bryn Forbes

DNP
DNP
2.5
0
0
0
4.5
3.5
0
DNP
1.5


4
Dejounte Murray

DNP
DNP
0
DNP
0
2.5
DNP
DNP
0
DNP
0.6



WIN / LOSS


G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
G7
G8
G9
G10
TEAM AVG GRADE


4.2
3.3
3.4
3.7
1.8
3.3
1.6
2.9
2.8
4.2
3.1



TEAM AVG SCORE: 101.9 pts

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULTS FOR GAMES 11-20:



GAMES PLAYED
PLAYER


G11
G12
G13
G14
G15
G16
G17
G18
G19
G20
GRADE AVG


X
Dewayne Dedmon

4
N/A
N/A
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
4.5
4.5
4
4.25


X
Patty Mills

3.5
N/A
N/A
4.5
3
4.5
4.5
2.5
5.5
5
4.13


X
Kawhi Leonard

4
N/A
N/A
3.5
5.5
5
2
3.5
3.5
4
3.88


X
David Lee

3.5
N/A
N/A
4
3.5
5
3
1
3.5
4.5
3.50


X
Manu Ginobili

4
N/A
N/A
2
2
3
DNP
4
DNP
5.5
3.42


X
Tony Parker

4
N/A
N/A
DNP
4
3
5
0
DNP
DNP
3.20


X
LaMarcus Aldridge

4
N/A
N/A
DNP
4.5
3.5
3
3.5
1
2.5
3.14


X
Jonathon Simmons

2.5
N/A
N/A
2
1.5
3.5
4
2.5
1.5
4.5
2.75


X
Pau Gasol

4
N/A
N/A
2.5
3
2.5
2
2
DNP
2.5
2.64


X
Davis Bertans

0
N/A
N/A
2
5
5.5
1
0
4.5
DNP
2.57


X
Danny Green

0
N/A
N/A
2
5
4.5
3
1.5
3.5
1
2.56


X
Nico Laprovittola

DNP
N/A
N/A
DNP
DNP
DNP
2
DNP
2
3.5
2.50


X
Bryn Forbes

DNP
N/A
N/A
1
DNP
DNP
2
DNP
DNP
DNP
1.50


X
Kyle Anderson

0
N/A
N/A
0
0
DNP
2
0
2.5
DNP
0.75


X
Dejounte Murray

0
N/A
N/A
1
DNP
DNP
2
0
DNP
DNP
0.75



WIN / LOSS


G11
G12
G13
G14
G15
G16
G17
G18
G19
G20
TEAM AVG GRADE


2.6
N/A
N/A
2.2
3.4
4
2.7
1.9
3.2
3.7
2.97



TEAM AVG SCORE: 104 pts

*For this second batch of grade avgs, I didn't include the G12(SAC) & G13(LAL) games grades.

**For the Sacramento game I never founded the thread. I went to the original Chinook's Game Grades assignment thread but it wasn't hyperlinked.

***The vs Lakers grades were never made.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Darius Bieber
12-07-2016, 06:48 PM
Thanks for putting the work in for this homie

TheDoctor
12-08-2016, 08:56 AM
Thanks for putting the work in for this homie

:toast

Chinook
12-08-2016, 09:15 AM
Funny that the Spurs have been objectively better in the most recent 10 games but have been graded worse. Maybe it has to do with the team as whole underachieving and there being less leniency due to Green and Parker being healthy?

aussie91
12-08-2016, 10:03 AM
MVPatty keeps getting it done Dedmon is surely deserving of more minutes as well

GSH
12-08-2016, 10:50 AM
Funny - with all the bitching and second-guessing of the grades each game, you put them together and they look pretty representative. (The Danny anomaly after playing only 2 of the first 10 notwithstanding.) Kawhi is obviously the Spurs' best player, but he's under-achieved in some of the recent games. Dedmon and Lee have mostly exceeded expectations. Patty has been pretty consistently good, with a couple of blips. Pau and Aldridge have some well-deserved 0-2 scores that drag down their averages.

Starting at about midway through the season, it would be cool to look at the standard deviations, to show how consistent/inconsistent they have been.

Cry Havoc
12-08-2016, 05:25 PM
Funny - with all the bitching and second-guessing of the grades each game, you put them together and they look pretty representative. (The Danny anomaly after playing only 2 of the first 10 notwithstanding.) Kawhi is obviously the Spurs' best player, but he's under-achieved in some of the recent games. Dedmon and Lee have mostly exceeded expectations. Patty has been pretty consistently good, with a couple of blips. Pau and Aldridge have some well-deserved 0-2 scores that drag down their averages.

Starting at about midway through the season, it would be cool to look at the standard deviations, to show how consistent/inconsistent they have been.

I'm surprised Simmons is so low on the totem pole. It's clear how well he played in the first 10 and how drastically upward predictions about his future games were ramped, because he's still been the surprise of the team alongside Dedmon.

Robz4000
12-08-2016, 05:43 PM
Funny that the Spurs have been objectively better in the most recent 10 games but have been graded worse. Maybe it has to do with the team as whole underachieving and there being less leniency due to Green and Parker being healthy?

Think it has to do with those game grades after the first Washington game tbh.

apalisoc_9
12-08-2016, 05:48 PM
Funny that the Spurs have been objectively better in the most recent 10 games but have been graded worse. Maybe it has to do with the team as whole underachieving and there being less leniency due to Green and Parker being healthy?

Well if you're playing teams thats basically outshitting you..ot doesnt matter if everyone gets a collective D if the opponet collectively is playing at an F level.

GSH
12-08-2016, 06:32 PM
I'm surprised Simmons is so low on the totem pole. It's clear how well he played in the first 10 and how drastically upward predictions about his future games were ramped, because he's still been the surprise of the team alongside Dedmon.


I decided not to even mention Simmons, and spare myself the arguments. Lots of people here insist he's played terrible, on nights that I think he's at least living up to expectations. Same with Lap.

Cry Havoc
12-08-2016, 06:43 PM
I decided not to even mention Simmons, and spare myself the arguments. Lots of people here insist he's played terrible, on nights that I think he's at least living up to expectations. Same with Lap.

If he's on the court, it means he's overperforming expectations. If he's playing more than 10 minutes a night, that's sensational.

travis2
12-09-2016, 03:40 PM
*snip*


*For this second batch of grade avgs, I didn't include the G12(SAC) & G13(LAL) games grades.

**For the Sacramento game I never founded the thread. I went to the original Chinook's Game Grades assignment thread but it wasn't hyperlinked.

***The vs Lakers grades were never made.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The SAC game grades were on the alternate site. I am doing a backup copy to yours, so I have them.

Green - 4
Leonard - 5
Mills - 1.5
Lee - 4.5
Ginobili - 0.5
Parker - 6
Simmons 4
Gasol - 6
Aldridge - 4.5
Dedmon - DNP
Anderson - DNP
Bertans - 5.5
Laprovittola - DNP
Forbes - DNP
Murray - DNP

You are correct...no one stepped up to do the LAL game. For that game, so I would have a valid number for the games played, I checked the boxscore for who played and gave them INC grades.

INC = Leonard, Mills, Ginobili, Parker, Gasol, Aldridge, Anderson, Bertans, Laprovittola, Murray. Changed "Games Played" to COUNT(range) + COUNTIF(same range, "INC")

TheDoctor
01-17-2017, 02:07 PM
Exceeded the character count in the OP. Here are the grades for Games 21-30 and 31-40!

Methodology:
1) Write down the given grade in each game for each player.
2) Assign a value to the grade based on the following made-up scale:



A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F


6
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0


3) Average the grades values after 10 games.


RESULTS FOR GAMES 21-30:



GAMES PLAYED

PLAYER
G21
G22
G23
G24
G25
G26
G28
G29
G30
GRADE AVG


X
Kawhi Leonard
3.5
6
5.5
6
2.5
4
3
2.5
6
4.33


X
Dewayne Dedmon
6
5.5
1
2.5
5
5.5
3.5
3
3
3.89


X
Manu Ginobili
4
5.5
0
DNP
4
3.5
5
DNP
DNP
3.67


X
Patty Mills
0
5.5
5.5
5
2
1
5
1
5.5
3.39


X
David Lee
1
4.5
3
4
4.5
4
3
3
3
3.33


X
Jonathon Simmons
4
3.5
1.5
5
0
3.5
3
1
4.5
2.89


X
LaMarcus Aldridge
5.5
3.5
0
4
DNP
1.5
3.5
0
4.5
2.81


X
Pau Gasol
3
3.5
0.5
2.5
4.5
4
3
1
DNP
2.75


X
Tony Parker
2
DNP
1.5
4.5
4
3.5
3.5
0
DNP
2.71


X
Kyle Anderson
4
5
0
0
0
5
DNP
3
2
2.38


X
Davis Bertans
4.5
2.5
DNP
2.5
3.5
2
0
DNP
1
2.29


X
Danny Green
1.5
3
1.5
2
0.5
0.5
5.5
1.5
2.5
2.06


X
Dejounte Murray
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
2.5
DNP
0
3.5
2.00


X
Bryn Forbes
DNP
0
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
0.00



WIN / LOSS

G21

G22
G23
G24
G25
G26
G28
G29
G30
TEAM GRADE AVG


3.25

4.00
1.82
3.45
2.77

3.12
3.45
1.45
3.55

2.98



*For this second batch of grade avgs, I didn't include the G27(PEL) games grades.

**The vs Pelicans grades were never made.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULTS FOR GAMES 31-40:



GAMES PLAYED

PLAYER
G31
G32
G33
G34
G35
G36
G37
G38

G39

G40
GRADE AVG


9
LaMarcus Aldridge
5.5
6
2.5
5
6
6
4.5
DNP
3.5
4
4.78


8
Kawhi Leonard
5.5
DNP
DNP
1.5
5
4.5
4
5.5
6
5
4.63


10
Tony Parker
2.5
5.5
4.5
4
6
6
3
1.5
4.5
2.5
4.00


10
Dewayne Dedmon
4.5
2.5
3
1
5
2.5
6
2.5
4.5
4.5
3.60


10
Jonathon Simmons
2.5
4
5
3.5
4
1.5
3.5
4
5
2
3.50


10
Danny Green
2.5
5
5
2.5
4.5
3.5
4
3.5
3.5
1
3.50


10
Pau Gasol
2.5
4.5
3
1.5
2.5
4.5
3.5
3
5.5
2.5
3.30


9
David Lee
4
5
4
0.5
3.5
4
DNP
4
2.5
2
3.28


10
Manu Ginobili
2
4.5
5
3.5
4
4
3
0
0.5
2.5
2.90


8
Davis Bertans
0
2
0
DNP
5.5
DNP
5.5
4.5
3
0
2.56


9
Patty Mills
2.5
1
3.5
1.5
4.5
2.5
3
0.5
2.5
DNP
2.39


9
Kyle Anderson
0
0
4
2.5
4
4
0
DNP
3.5
3.5
2.39


6
Dejounte Murray
0
4
0
DNP
3
DNP
0
DNP
4
DNP
1.83


1
Bryn Forbes
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
DNP
1
1.00



WIN / LOSS

G31

G32
G33
G34
G35
G36
G37
G38
G39
G40
TEAM GRADE AVG


2.62

3.67
3.29

2.45

4.42

3.91

3.33

2.90

3.73

2.54

3.29

$pursDynasty
01-17-2017, 02:19 PM
great work and impressive and like the if we won or loss part at the bottom too. thanks adds much value to the site.