Spurs .0004102 behind Lakers

[Galileo]

Including the Spurs original franchise stats from the ABA, the Spurs now trail the Lakers in all-time winning percentage by 0.0004102 or 0.04102%.

That is not much.

If the Spurs win their next 2 games and the Lakers lose their next 2, then the Spurs would lead by 0.000012 or 0.0012%.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/

:lobt2: :ihit :flag: :lmao :nope :lobt: :lol :bang :hat :blah

[Robz4000]

Thought the Spurs already had the best overall record?

[TheMulletMan3000]

Thought the Spurs already had the best overall record?

this is aba+nba

[Galileo]

this is aba+nba

Yep, includes 5 seasons Dallas Chapparals, 1 season Texas Chapparals, and 3 seasons SA Spurs ABA. The team went 378 wins and 366 losses in those years.

[Russ]

Yep, includes 5 seasons Dallas Chapparals, 1 season Texas Chapparals, and 3 seasons SA Spurs ABA. The team went 378 wins and 366 losses in those years.

The NBA snobs would not normally include ABA stats.

But they might if it kept the Spurs all-time win percentage down.

Spurs have the best all-time NBA winning percentage easy.

(Kinda ironic that the Spurs' winning percentage in that inferior ABA league actually brings them down.) :)

[Galileo]

New standings:

Lakers: .6013338
Spurs: .6009495

Difference: .0003843

[Spurtacular]

Clippers at .397. We forget they were so bad for so long.

[SpurPadre]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

[GSH]

The NBA snobs would not normally include ABA stats.

But they might if it kept the Spurs all-time win percentage down.

Spurs have the best all-time NBA winning percentage easy.

(Kinda ironic that the Spurs' winning percentage in that inferior ABA league actually brings them down.) :)


100% true. They're very selective about when they want to include ABA stats. There's no doubt about why they want to use them in this instance.

[Solid D]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

:lol

[Biggems]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

ouch......like a brand new wound......that scar runs deep, all the way to the bone.

[Mister Sinister]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

Ayyy lmao

[Ron Swanson]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hYB-LXxyMNE/UOlmGLo_GWI/AAAAAAAAE9g/yVTG_qd43UQ/w1200-h630-p-nu/jim-the-office.gif

[TampaDude]

Now we da best, right?

[LoneStarState'sPride]

I thought we were .4 behind the Lakers, tbh.

Too soon :lol

[mudyez]

The 96/97 season is costing us. If the Admiral doesn't get hurt, we are already ahead of the Lakers.

[bdictjames]

The 96/97 season is costing us. If the Admiral doesn't get hurt, we are already ahead of the Lakers.
But we never get the greatest power forward of all-time :) It was all in the plan.

[Kawhitstorm]

The 96/97 season is costing us. If the Admiral doesn't get hurt, we are already ahead of the Lakers.

By the end of the season, the Spurs will have a 20 game cushion.

[Galileo]

New standings:

Lakers; .6012224
Spurs; .6010492

Difference; .0001732 = 1/5774

[lefty]

How many did the Lakers destroy the Spurs in the playoffs tbh

[DMC]

Dallas wasn't the Spurs. LA isn't in Minnesota. Let's keep it real. Perhaps the same folks transitioned, but it's a different team in a different city.

[Galileo]

New standings:

Spurs; .6011488
Lakers; .6011111

Difference: Spurs LEAD by .0000377 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spurs are best!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[SpurPadre]

New standings:

Spurs; .6011488
Lakers; .6011111

Difference: Spurs LEAD by .0000377 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spurs are best!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah but still fucking .4, tbh. :bang

[Galileo]

Interesting stats, if you click on SHOW PARTIAL ROWS of http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ the Spurs ABA only are 8th best record of all-time, Spurs NBA 2nd all-time behind Denver ABA (they only played 2 seasons). The Texas Chaparrals are the 6th worst of all-time.

[Galileo]

Denver Nuggets ABA 1975 1976 .744
San Antonio Spurs NBA 1977 2017 .622
Oklahoma City Thunder NBA 2009 2017 .615
Los Angeles Lakers NBA 1961 2017 .611
Los Angeles Lakers NBA/BAA 1949 2017 .601
San Antonio Spurs NBA/ABA 1968 2017 .601
Boston Celtics NBA/BAA 1947 2017 .588
San Antonio Spurs ABA 1974 1976 .579

.....

Texas Chaparrals ABA 1971 1971 .357
Milwaukee Hawks NBA 1952 1955 .324
Chicago Zephyrs NBA 1963 1963 .313
New York Nets NBA 1977 1977 .268
Chicago Packers NBA 1962 1962 .225
Vancouver Grizzlies NBA 1996 2001 .220

This does not include defunct franchises.

[Kawhitstorm]

Oklahoma City Thunder NBA 2009 2017 .615
Los Angeles Lakers NBA 1961 2017 .611


Fakers cucked by Meth City.:rollin

[Seventyniner]

Denver Nuggets ABA 1975 1976 .744
San Antonio Spurs NBA 1977 2017 .622
Oklahoma City Thunder NBA 2009 2017 .615
Los Angeles Lakers NBA 1961 2017 .611
Los Angeles Lakers NBA/BAA 1949 2017 .601
San Antonio Spurs NBA/ABA 1968 2017 .601
Boston Celtics NBA/BAA 1947 2017 .588
San Antonio Spurs ABA 1974 1976 .579

.....

Texas Chaparrals ABA 1971 1971 .357
Milwaukee Hawks NBA 1952 1955 .324
Chicago Zephyrs NBA 1963 1963 .313
New York Nets NBA 1977 1977 .268
Chicago Packers NBA 1962 1962 .225
Vancouver Grizzlies NBA 1996 2001 .220

This does not include defunct franchises.

Good, a place that correctly doesn't count any Sonics numbers for the Thunder franchise. I still see a few places talking about Durant taking over the franchise scoring lead when he basically was the leader the whole time.

[Galileo]

Spurs have clearly moved ahead of Lakers:

Spurs; .602
Lakers; .601

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/

[exstatic]

The NBA snobs would not normally include ABA stats.

But they might if it kept the Spurs all-time win percentage down.

Spurs have the best all-time NBA winning percentage easy.

(Kinda ironic that the Spurs' winning percentage in that inferior ABA league actually brings them down.) :)

That is correct. ABA stats are not included and were never counted in player totals. If you go by the FULL NBA history of every NBA franchise, SA has been on top for a while now.

As of the end of last season:

SA .621
LA .603
BOS .588