Bullshington Post: Russians hacked US powergid

[hater]

:lmao these bullshit journalists from the Bullshington Post are getting pathetic

A malware from Russian origin is found in an old laptop sitting in the power grid company. Not even connected to the network :lmao

And their headline reads: Russian govmt hacks US powergrid system :lmao

And they dont even apologize for this after being found retarded :lmao

Scum :rolleyes how anyone can read that trash paper is beyond me

WPost’s New ‘Fake News’ on Russian ‘Hack

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/01/02/wposts-new-fake-news-on-russian-hack/

Then, last Friday, the newspaper was at it again – breathlessly reporting that the Vermont energy grid was apparently hacked by the scapegoat du jour, Russia. Although there should have been obvious questions asked: Why Vermont? What has that state ever done to Russia? Well, not much as it turns out; nor Russia to Vermont.

Yet again the Post has revised its reporting down to the fact that a laptop, completely unconnected to the grid, according to the energy provider’s statement, had been infected by malware. In other words, there was no Russian hacking into the Vermont power grid.

[in2deep]

They love this paper here in the DC area. They have good local sections. But their politics and news is attrocious. The onion has better and more accurate articles.

they smeared Bernie to death, then
tried the same with Trump

[FuzzyLumpkins]

consortium news? well it is nice to see that nothing much has changed around here.

[mavsfan1000]

They almost started ww3. Fuck them.

[in2deep]

consortium news? well it is nice to see that nothing much has changed around here.

i read the posted article and didnt find any false claim in it nor any wild/biased conclusions. Could you please point out what is wrong with that article?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

i read the posted article and didnt find any false claim in it nor any wild/biased conclusions. Could you please point out what is wrong with that article?

You go to sputnik.com too like hater does?

[TheSanityAnnex]

You go to sputnik.com too like hater does?
Are you claiming the WaPo didn't write the initial story?

Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say











Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?utm_term=.3cce9903f304

[in2deep]

You go to sputnik.com too like hater does?

No my question is refering to the posted article from consortiumnews. Have you read it and if yes which parts fo you find false/misleading?

id really like to know. Thanks

[TheSanityAnnex]

Are you claiming the WaPo didn't write the initial story?

Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say










Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?utm_term=.3cce9903f304



This one was even worse from the WaPo



Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say


By Craig Timberg (https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/craig-timberg/) November 24, 2016 ([email protected]?subject=Reader%20feedb ack%20for%20'Russian%20propaganda%20effort%20helpe d%20spread%20%E2%80%98fake%20news%E2%80%99%20durin g%20election,%20experts%20say')
Editor’s Note: The Washington Post on Nov. 24 published a story on the work of four sets of researchers who have examined what they say are Russian propaganda efforts to undermine American democracy and interests. One of them was PropOrNot, a group that insists on public anonymity, which issued a report identifying more than 200 websites that, in its view, wittingly or unwittingly published or echoed Russian propaganda. A number of those sites have objected to being included on PropOrNot’s list, and some of the sites, as well as others not on the list, have publicly challenged the group’s methodology and conclusions. The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings regarding any individual media outlet, nor did the article purport to do so. Since publication of The Post’s story, PropOrNot has removed some sites from its list

[TheSanityAnnex]

No my question is refering to the posted article from consortiumnews. Have you read it and if yes which parts fo you find false/misleading?

id really like to know. ThanksHe won't come back to answer, he does this all the time when he runs his mouth before reading an article.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

No my question is refering to the posted article from consortiumnews. Have you read it and if yes which parts fo you find false/misleading?

id really like to know. Thanks

Is it an AP source?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

He won't come back to answer, he does this all the time when he runs his mouth before reading an article.

Dimwit, I don't have time nor inclination to be on here all day every day like you. Have fun with your territorial pissing, chump.

Ever heard of the term 'consider the source?' That is what I was speaking of. I get that you desperately want Breitbart and the like to be credible but it still isn't. Have fun in your echo chamber. I will continue to ask for corroboration.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Dimwit, I don't have time nor inclination to be on here all day every day like you. Have fun with your territorial pissing, chump.

Ever heard of the term 'consider the source?' That is what I was speaking of. I get that you desperately want Breitbart and the like to be credible but it still isn't. Have fun in your echo chamber. I will continue to ask for corroboration.
I gave you the direct source dipshit.


Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say








Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that Russian hackers had penetrated the U.S. electric grid. Authorities say there is no indication of that so far. The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?utm_term=.3cce9903f304

[in2deep]

He won't come back to answer, he does this all the time when he runs his mouth before reading an article.

Seems like it. He didnt even read the article. Thats sad but its the state our people are.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Seems like it. He didnt even read the article. Thats sad but its the state our people are.

I'm going to guess you got this off of a social media post. It's not an AP source. Deal with it.

[DarrinS]

Isn't this fake news an old story by now?

[in2deep]

Isn't this fake news an old story by now?

Just curious. Can you define old?