I thought WikiLeaks was blindly partisan?

[Clipper Nation]

823212055322853382

:lol Watch all the board liberals hop right back on Assange's piece again since he's going after a Republican.

[boutons_deux]

823212055322853382

:lol Watch all the board liberals hop right back on Assange's piece again since he's going after a Republican.

If they receive his tax returns, will they release them?

Assange electing Trash totally disqualifies him from being non-partisan, as well as his asking Pootin to protect him.

[Thread]

He doesn't HAVE TO.

[Th'Pusher]

He doesn't HAVE TO.
But he said he would

[Th'Pusher]

Which makes him a liar

[Thread]

But he said he would

He changed his mind.

[Thread]

Which makes him a liar

Big deal. Hussein Obama lied for 8 years and got a big fat juicy pension in return.

[DMX7]

823212055322853382

:lol Watch all the board liberals hop right back on Assange's piece again since he's going after a Republican.

LMAO. Unless Russia has them, Wikileaks and everyone else will never see those tax returns.

[Clipper Nation]

Big deal. Hussein Obama lied for 8 years and got a big fat juicy pension in return.
Dale

[Clipper Nation]

If they receive his tax returns, will they release them?
Can you read? That's literally what their tweet says: "send them to us so we can release them."

[DMX7]

It actually comes across as a desperate attempt to be non-partisan.

[Thread]

Dale

CN

[Clipper Nation]

It actually comes across as a desperate attempt to be non-partisan.
:lol Grasping at straws.

WikiLeaks has dug up dirt on Republican administrations long before this election. They leaked Palin's emails during the 2008 election. They have always leaked shit from both sides of the aisle and all over the world. They were never partisan to begin with. The only partisanship is coming from all the critics who whined that a Democrat was being put under the microscope, because heaven forbid they're only coddled by 99.9% of all media outlets instead of 100%.

WikiLeaks wouldn't have been an issue if our media wasn't full of shameless left-wing hacks colluding with their party of choice. If our legacy media did their jobs, we wouldn't need people like Assange to tell us what's actually going on.

[Thread]

:lol Grasping at straws.

WikiLeaks has dug up dirt on Republican administrations long before this election. They leaked Palin's emails during the 2008 election. They have always leaked shit from both sides of the aisle and all over the world. They were never partisan to begin with. The only partisanship is coming from all the critics who whined that a Democrat was being put under the microscope, because heaven forbid they're only coddled by 99.9% of all media outlets instead of 100%.

WikiLeaks wouldn't have been an issue if our media wasn't full of shameless left-wing hacks colluding with their party of choice. If our legacy media did their jobs, we wouldn't need people like Assange to tell us what's actually going on.

Your mother & I are very proud you, son.

- Dad

[Will Hunting]

Wikileaks went after Hilary as hard as they did only as a respond to how hard she tried going after them while she was Secretary of State, so she largely has herself to blame for it. Same reason why Putin did too, she tried meddling in his last election to unseat him so he did the same thing to her.

[DMC]

Which makes him a liar

Gitmo still open?

Aaaalrighty then.

[boutons_deux]

Can you read? That's literally what their tweet says: "send them to us so we can release them."

IBIWISI, and I probably won't.

[Mitch]

:lol people thinking the organization that shit on politicians regardless of party is partisan

[Th'Pusher]

Gitmo still open?

Aaaalrighty then.

That's not due to a lack of effort by Barry. DMC showing his ass with another poor analogy.

[Spurminator]

This could be what finally swings the election in HRC's favor.

[Thread]

That's not due to a lack of effort by Barry. DMC showing his ass with another poor analogy.

And 8 years ago Rush swore he'd never close it.

Rush

[DMC]

That's not due to a lack of effort by Barry. DMC showing his ass with another poor analogy.

He promised it. He was POTUS for 8 years. Ding ding...

:lol not knowing what an analogy is.

[TheSanityAnnex]

If they receive his tax returns, will they release them?

Assange electing Trash totally disqualifies him from being non-partisan, as well as his asking Pootin to protect him.Do you believe Assange should have not released the undoctored emails that showed collusion between the DNC/Media and the plan to fuck over Bernie Sanders? Do you believe the American people did not deserve to know this information before casting a vote for Hillary Clinton?

[Th'Pusher]

He promised it. He was POTUS for 8 years. Ding ding...

:lol not knowing what an analogy is.

It wasn't for a lack of trying, therefore it wasn't a lie. An anolgy is a comparison between two things. You were comparing Donald's refusal to release his taxes, after repeatedly claiming he would once the IRS audit was completed, with Barry's inability to close GITMO. It was a bad analogy. Your second in the span of a week.

[hater]

Shitlery suggested having Assange killed. She then said she was joking.

Thats why Julian went apeshit on her

Funny, Shitlery also suggested shooting down Russian planes.

She dug her own grave

[Thread]

Shitlery suggested having Assange killed. She then said she was joking.

Thats why Julian went apeshit on her

Funny, Shitlery also suggested shooting down Russian planes.

She dug her own grave

the hater

[boutons_deux]

Do you believe Assange should have not released the undoctored emails that showed collusion between the DNC/Media and the plan to fuck over Bernie Sanders? Do you believe the American people did not deserve to know this information before casting a vote for Hillary Clinton?

I knew Bernie was screwed from the beginning. The McGoverns, the Carters, and then the Bernies are to be blocked systematically by the super-delegates. It worked.

Assange could have dumped the entire cache at once as soon as he got it, but (and probably with advice from his friend Putin) he released it week by week to maximize deflection from and damage to Hillary. Blatantly partisan, pro-Repug, pro-Putin

"Do you believe the American people did not deserve to know information" on Repugs "before casting a vote for Trash?"

[Clipper Nation]

:lol Please. You wanted Assange to dump all the emails at once so Media could talk about them for a week and then drop the subject for the rest of the election. Unfortunately for you, he's too smart to do that. It has nothing to do with Putin and everything to do with playing Media like a fiddle.

[boutons_deux]

:lol Please. You wanted Assange to dump all the emails at once so Media could talk about them for a week and then drop the subject for the rest of the election. Unfortunately for you, he's too smart to do that. It has nothing to do with Putin and everything to do with playing Media like a fiddle.

Assange asked Putin for protection.

And why would Assange want to damage only Hillary while remaining totally silent about the Repugs, if he were non-partisan?

Putin wanted Trash, and Assange greatly helped deliver Trash. Naive to assume it was a coincidence.

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol Boo is still whining about the emails???

:lmao

#circlingthedrain

[boutons_deux]

:lol Boo is still whining about the emails???

:lmao

#circlingthedrain

You Lie

[TheSanityAnnex]

Assange asked Putin for protection.

And why would Assange want to damage only Hillary while remaining totally silent about the Repugs, if he were non-partisan?

Putin wanted Trash, and Assange greatly helped deliver Trash. Naive to assume it was a coincidence.If Assange had RNC emails and released them it would have only helped more as the RNC was trying to torpedo Trump much like the DNC was trying to torpedo Sanders.

Were any of the leaked Podesta emails doctored by Wikileaks?

[Adam Lambert]

870024573810610176

lol not partisan

[baseline bum]

If Assange had RNC emails and released them it would have only helped more as the RNC was trying to torpedo Trump much like the DNC was trying to torpedo Sanders.

Were any of the leaked Podesta emails doctored by Wikileaks?

And yet you want to call the Washington Post fake news instead of acknowledging Republicans inside Trump's staff are torpedoing him to the Post and the NY Times.

[spurraider21]

870024573810610176

lol not partisan
no bro its totally fair and balanced

[TSA]

And yet you want to call the Washington Post fake news instead of acknowledging Republicans inside Trump's staff are torpedoing him to the Post and the NY Times.

I can't speak for TheSanityAnnex but I've been saying all along the leaks are coming from Graham and McCain.

[baseline bum]

I can't speak for TheSanityAnnex but I've been saying all along the leaks are coming from Graham and McCain.

You have been saying all along the Washington Post is just making shit up.

[TSA]

You have been saying all along the Washington Post is just making shit up.

No I haven't. All leaks aren't true, all leaks aren't fake, but they are all put out there to damage Trump.

[baseline bum]

No I haven't. All leaks aren't true, all leaks aren't fake, but they are all put out there to damage Trump.

Yeah you have. :lol

[TSA]

Yeah you have. :lol
I've said the Washington Post is a CIA mouthpiece, that isn't the same as what you are claiming. Hell I've even linked articles from the WaPo myself.

[baseline bum]

I've said the Washington Post is a CIA mouthpiece, that isn't the same as what you are claiming. Hell I've even linked articles from the WaPo myself.

And you have said the Washington Post was just making shit up.

[TSA]

And you have said the Washington Post was just making shit up.

umm okay? I never said everything they've put out is fake news so I'm not sure what you're getting at.

[monosylab1k]

umm okay? I never said everything they've put out is fake news

Only the stuff that doesn't fit your agenda

[TSA]

Only the stuff that doesn't fit your agenda

Only the stuff they don't come back and retract or revise.

[Chucho]

The WaPo snitches on itself unintentionally. Best fact checkers, ever.

[spurraider21]

The WaPo snitches on itself unintentionally. Best fact checkers, ever.
The white house too

:lol leaks

[Chucho]

The white house too

:lol leaks

Yeah, but they are leaking news. The WaPo snitches on itself with their fake news.

[spurraider21]

Yeah, but they are leaking news. The WaPo snitches on itself with their fake news.their leaks are revealing the fake news they put out officially :lol

[Spurminator]

930187824179052544

[Spurminator]

It actually comes across as a desperate attempt to be non-partisan.

Winner.

[Reck]

Quality bump. :lol

Clipper Nation (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=28500), sup?

[Reck]

:lol people thinking the organization that shit on politicians regardless of party is partisan

Wrong.

[Mitch]

Wrong.

Sub-par Quote, they remain far more objective than 99.99% of media outlets :lol

Sup with your Bro, Tony poedesta, Reck?

[boutons_deux]

If Assange had RNC emails and released them it would have only helped more as the RNC was trying to torpedo Trump much like the DNC was trying to torpedo Sanders.

Were any of the leaked Podesta emails doctored by Wikileaks?

Pootin succeeded, is winning, kept his hated bitch Hillary out of office, destabilized US democracy with Trash, and will be equally "winning" if Trash gets removed, since USA democracy, stability, credibility would be damaged.

Pootin wants to fuck up America, degrade it, doesn't care how that arrives.

[Pavlov]

Sub-par Quote, they remain far more objective than 99.99% of media outlets :lol

Sup with your Bro, Tony poedesta, Reck?Zero to full deflection in half a sentence.

[Spurminator]

Despite the constant claims, from Assange and the Trumps, that the emails stolen from Democrats implicated Clinton in scandal and corruption, it is important to keep in mind that the WikiLeaks method of encouraging Trump supporters and Reddit trolls to scour the documents for evidence of malfeasance did not, in fact, uncover any such evidence.

Instead, the hacked emails were used to reverse-engineer preposterous conspiracy theories, like the imaginary pedophilia scandal called Pizzagate, which WikiLeaks was still treating as real two months after the election.


This is the real tragedy and menace of the public and private collaboration of WikiLeaks with Trump. An organization with a sterling reputation for providing the public with accurate information about secret government and corporate activities was used to launder conspiracy theories that helped elect a racist, sexual predator president of the United States.


That might be a terrific result for people like Julian Assange, who see a dysfunctional, discredited White House as a way to undermine what they see as the real evil empire. For Americans condemned to live under Trump, particularly the most marginalized who, as Noam Chomsky has observed, will suffer the most from his cruelty, it is a far more troubling outcome.

https://theintercept.com/2017/11/15/wikileaks-julian-assange-donald-trump-jr-hillary-clinton/

[boutons_deux]

Inspiring: How Julian Assange overcame the odds and

ended up sucking more than anyone ever thought he could

Assange and Wikileaks have become a case study in self-parody.



https://theoutline.com/post/2493/julian-assange-sucks?utm_source=NL

[RandomGuy]

930187824179052544


“Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us,” WikiLeaks went on, pointing Trump Jr. to the link wlsearch.tk, which it said would help Trump’s followers dig through the trove of stolen documents and find stories. “There’s many great stories the press are missing and we’re sure some of your follows [sic] will find it,” WikiLeaks went on. “Btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message. But just 15 minutes after it was sent, as The Wall Street Journal’s Byron Tau pointed out, Donald Trump himself tweeted, “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!”

[Spurminator]

1037880524516282370

Wikileaks before 2016: The anonymity of whistleblowers is paramount.

Wikileaks after 2016: "Here's some data analysis to help you find your mole, Mr. Trump."

[RandomGuy]

1037880524516282370

Wikileaks before 2016: The anonymity of whistleblowers is paramount.

Wikileaks after 2016: "Here's some data analysis to help you find your mole, Mr. Trump."

Not biased at all. (rolls eyes)

[djohn2oo8]

Lol Clit Nation

[TSA]

1037880524516282370

Wikileaks before 2016: The anonymity of whistleblowers is paramount.

Wikileaks after 2016: "Here's some data analysis to help you find your mole, Mr. Trump."

It appears Wikileaks was way off if it’s Fiona Hill.

1037687496010878976

Thread

[Spurminator]

It appears Wikileaks was way off if it’s Fiona Hill.

1037687496010878976

Thread

I have no idea if that's correct. But LOL again at your sources.

1037749997272530944

So the insinuation is that Fiona Hill submitted an anonymous op-ed to the NYT because George Soros recently bought stock there?

Does The Chillum understand stocks?

[TSA]

I have no idea if that's correct. But LOL again at your sources.

1037749997272530944

So the insinuation is that Fiona Hill submitted an anonymous op-ed to the NYT because George Soros recently bought stock there?

Does The Chillum understand stocks?

Pretty weak attempt by cherry picking one tweet. That wasn’t the insinuation at all.