R.I.P. CNN

[TheSanityAnnex]

"One of the things I think this administration hasn’t figured out yet is that there’s only one television network that is seen in Beijing, Moscow, Seoul, Tokyo, Pyongyang, Baghdad, Tehran, and Damascus — and that’s CNN. The perception of Donald Trump in capitals around the world is shaped, in many ways, by CNN. Continuing to have an adversarial relationship with that network is a mistake."
-CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker

[ElNono]

why RIP? They have a pizzeria in the basement?

[ElNono]

I mean, don't even watch the channel, but aren't they owned by Turner? They should be fine financially at least.

[spurraider21]

why RIP? They have a pizzeria in the basement?:cry stop making fun of rape victims

[mavsfan1000]

Corruption News Network

[ElNono]

Corruption News Network

What's the competition Friends Of Xenophobia?

[Thread]

Corruption News Network

[Wild Cobra]

why RIP? They have a pizzeria in the basement?

Maybe because it was a threat.

The Donald doesn't like threats very well.

[Wild Cobra]

Corruption News Network

I used to call the the Communist News Network.

Maybe that's why they are in Russia, China, etc...

Maybe my assessment is accurate, though just meant as a joke?

[hater]

Lmao what a joke

Clinton News Network loved Clintler and everyone still hated her ass :lmao

:lmao thinking that russians and chinese treat CNN as anything other than CIa propaganda :lmao

[boutons_deux]

Trash hates CNN and you assholes fall in line right behind him, as with Russia, like rats behind the Pied Piper.

He loves Murdoch's toilet paper NY Post, y'all read that, too?

[rmt]

"One of the things I think this administration hasn’t figured out yet is that there’s only one television network that is seen in Beijing, Moscow, Seoul, Tokyo, Pyongyang, Baghdad, Tehran, and Damascus — and that’s CNN. The perception of Donald Trump in capitals around the world is shaped, in many ways, by CNN. Continuing to have an adversarial relationship with that network is a mistake."
-CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker

Yep, CNN is the main outlet for American news in Toronto too - no wonder my Canadian relatives hate Trump so. Couldn't believe there was such a visceral reaction to a FOREIGN leader.

[boutons_deux]

such a visceral reaction to a FOREIGN leader.

your provincialist ignorance blocks you from knowing the world watches America very carefully, and daily.

People "hate" Trash for the facts about Trash, not because CNN, etc. publishes those facts.

[tlongII]

your provincialist ignorance blocks you from knowing the world watches America very carefully, and daily.

People "hate" Trash for the facts about Trash, not because CNN, etc. publishes those facts.

Bullshit. They dislike Trump due to the misinformation campaigns led by ignorant leftists like you.

[Mitch]

Trash hates CNN and you assholes fall in line right behind him, as with Russia, like rats behind the Pied Piper.

He loves Murdoch's toilet paper NY Post, y'all read that, too?

Beats the shitty Salon articles you paste here, botox.

[spurraider21]

I used to call the the Communist News Network.

Maybe that's why they are in Russia, China, etc...

Maybe my assessment is accurate, though just meant as a joke?
if true they would have massively pandered for bernie...

and if they were pro russia they would have been promoting trump

[DMC]

We love Iraq because of Al Jazeera.

[boutons_deux]

if true they would have massively pandered for bernie...

and if they were pro russia they would have been promoting trump

Bernie isn't a communist, he's not even hard-core socialist, he's social democrat.

[Chris]

Bullshit. They dislike Trump due to the misinformation campaigns led by ignorant leftists like you.

Gotheem!

[Thread]

Bernie isn't a communist, he's not even hard-core socialist, he's social democrat.

You need to tell that to ALL Media, because starting yesterday they've all called him a socialist, right to our face.

[Spurminator]

:lol Spicer

825008781771866112

825023746645905409

[UNT Eagles 2016]

who'd you vote for Dale Thread ?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Conservative provocateur James O'Keefe said Tuesday that he plans to release "hundreds of hours of tape" he said would expose CNN.

Speaking with Fox News host Sean Hannity in a radio interview on Tuesday, O'Keefe said he had accrued the unaired footage inside CNN's newsrooms from employees, according to reports from the network itself (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL21vbmV5LmNubi5jb20vMjAxNy8wMi8yMi9tZWR pYS9qYW1lcy1va2VlZmUtY25uLwA-/RS=%5EADA6EnnA_PSdns5vkyo6K85VfSjjJA-) and The Huffington Post (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5odWZmaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vZW50cnk vamFtZXMtb2tlZWZlLWxlYWtzLW5ld3Nyb29tLWZvb3RhZ2Vfd XNfNThhY2I2ZTllNGIwNGEwYjI3NGRkZGYyAA--/RS=%5EADAZkvzdEFX029clnCY1yCP4d4mvAY-).
He also alluded to releasing the obtained footage "WikiLeaks-style," or in systematic batches. Some of the footage is scheduled to be released on Thursday afternoon, O'Keefe said. He said it centers on "one corporation, multiple newsrooms."
O'Keefe's planned exposé follows a tenuous month during which President Donald Trump, his staff, and allies have devoted much airtime in criticizing and labeling CNN (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3RoZWhpbGwuY29tL2hvbWVuZXdzL2FkbWluaXN 0cmF0aW9uLzMxMzc3Ny10cnVtcC1iZXJhdGVzLWNubi1yZXBvc nRlci1mb3ItZmFrZS1uZXdzAA--/RS=%5EADA51kfrJeUDneORuHbnfgr3.14sYU-) as "fake news."


"My audience, the American people, are deeply upset at the media," O'Keefe told CNN in a telephone interview. "We think our media needs to be held to account, and CNN is kind of the leader of that. CNN has a very important role as an arbiter of news."

"This is all legally recorded information," he said.


The purported leaks also come after O'Keefe's statements from last month's pre-inauguration party dubbed the "DeploraBall." (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5idXNpbmVzc2luc2lkZXIuY29tL2RlcGx vcmFiYWxsLWdvcC1hbHQtcmlnaHQtMjAxNy0xAA--/RS=%5EADAcOkZS3CtZIILMn47DJc6ejnLz8U-) At the event, he said he planned on "going after the media next" and even called his footage "CNN Leaks."
"We are inside their newsrooms," he said, according to (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wb2xpdGljby5jb20vbWFnYXppbmUvc3R vcnkvMjAxNy8wMS90cnVtcHMtY2FzdC1vZi1jaGFyYWN0ZXJzL XRha2VzLWEtYm93LTIxNDY3NQA-/RS=%5EADAdxnwbdrNSalaCdJHq6tvMOEr418-) Politico (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wb2xpdGljby5jb20vbWFnYXppbmUvc3R vcnkvMjAxNy8wMS90cnVtcHMtY2FzdC1vZi1jaGFyYWN0ZXJzL XRha2VzLWEtYm93LTIxNDY3NQA-/RS=%5EADAdxnwbdrNSalaCdJHq6tvMOEr418-). He added he had spies "embedded in your institutions."

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/conservative-provocateur-james-okeefe-says-044730678.html

[TheSanityAnnex]

http://projectveritas.com/2017/02/21/cnnleaks-part-i/

[spurraider21]

lol this guy again

[TheSanityAnnex]

lol this guy got ACORN shut down and three DNC staffers fired

[spurraider21]

lol "rip cnn"... number 1 trafficked (not human trafficking, TSA) news website in the US, still http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US

[mavsfan1000]

Corruption News Network

[Winehole23]

The US Congress shut down ACORN based on O'Keefe's hoax video. There wasn't anything incriminating there.

[Winehole23]

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134685

[Winehole23]

O'Keefe broke into a US Senator's office in an attempt to plant a bug:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145265

[Winehole23]

O'Keefe paid 100K to ACORN and apologized:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=210606

[Reck]

TheSanityAnnex ethered part deux. :lol

[baseline bum]

O'Keefe is the definition of fake news.

[Winehole23]

Serial hoaxer:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=174545

[TheSanityAnnex]

O'Keefe paid 100K to ACORN and apologized:

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=210606
edit.

see you answered

[TheSanityAnnex]

O'Keefe is the definition of fake news.

So three DNC staffers were fired over fake news?

[DMC]

lol "rip cnn"... number 1 trafficked (not human trafficking, TSA) news website in the US, still http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US

Which means... ?

[spurraider21]

Which means... ?
As in they're not dying, hence mocking the "rip" comment

What's your stance? :cry

[Reck]

So three DNC staffers were fired over fake news?

They were let go over the scandal it created, it was an embarrassment. Not because O'faggot "exposed" them.

[Splits]

lol nothingburger

[TheSanityAnnex]

lol nothingburger

same was said about the Podesta emails when they first started leaking. Patience Splits.

[Splits]

same was said about the Podesta emails when they first started leaking. Patience Splits.

Derp derp, risotto, derp derp

[baseline bum]

So three DNC staffers were fired over fake news?

His ACORN sting was definitely fake news.

[Spurminator]

He also alluded to releasing the obtained footage "WikiLeaks-style," or in systematic batches. Some of the footage is scheduled to be released on Thursday afternoon, O'Keefe said. He said it centers on "one corporation, multiple newsrooms."

Yesterday was Thursday, right? I've had a few drinks this week so sometimes I get confused.

[TheSanityAnnex]

"One of the things I think this administration hasn’t figured out yet is that there’s only one television network that is seen in Beijing, Moscow, Seoul, Tokyo, Pyongyang, Baghdad, Tehran, and Damascus — and that’s CNN. The perception of Donald Trump in capitals around the world is shaped, in many ways, by CNN. Continuing to have an adversarial relationship with that network is a mistake."
-CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker

:lol

http://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/20170224-140638-2241x3984-153085.JPG (http://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/20170224-140638-2241x3984-153085.JPG)

[Reck]

:lol

http://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/20170224-140638-2241x3984-153085.JPG (http://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/20170224-140638-2241x3984-153085.JPG)

Why are you laughing? The only other reputable media boycotted it. The only ones in there were Breitbart and some other far right people.

TSA dummassery strikes again. :lol

[Blake]

835211808671744001

This is a ridiculous war that Trump is waging. He won't win in the end.

[hater]

:lmao CNN they really are in diapers and in a cage like SNL showed :lmao :lol :lmao

Hahahaha hilarious :lol

[Blake]

:lmao CNN they really are in diapers and in a cage like SNL showed :lmao :lol :lmao

Hahahaha hilarious :lol

No its not

[Reck]

835211808671744001

This is a ridiculous war that Trump is waging. He won't win in the end.

OK, they sounded bitter as fuck on that tweet. :lol

[spurraider21]

INCONVENIENT NEWS

[hater]

No its not

It is

For years CNN has been acting like kingmakers and they were so sold out to Clintler. Wikileaks exposed their reporters and they never admitted to any fault. Still havent.

Fuck them.

[Reck]

It is

For years CNN has been acting like kingmakers and they were so sold out to Clintler. Wikileaks exposed their reporters and they never admitted to any fault. Still havent.

Fuck them.

meh. They still get good ratings regardless.

[spurraider21]

Yeah,cnn fucked up there hater. They should've owned it

[Chucho]

Would it be acceptable if he just bashed New Fox during speeches, unwarranted, like his predecessor did countless times?

What's the difference? Old Fox carried out its right-wing agenda against Obama and they were mocked openly by the President, those were his coping mechanisms.

New Fox is waging its agendized war against this President. He's bashed them unprovoked in press conferences and speeches, like his predecessor. Right there, if left as is, this is nothing different than what the predecessor did.

Now he is refusing them entrance into the White House. That is Troll Godliness, it's just not acceptable for the POTUS to do.



Regardless, I don't side with media outlets so much as I do certain personalities and I find too many parallels between Old Fox and New Fox that it's laughable to deny that they are nothing more than partisan cheerleaders.

But, to Old Fox's credit, they carry a lot more stories from around the world that New Fox refuses to. How New Fox can continue to refuse to report on Muslims killing and persecuting Christians overseas, ya know, the BIGGEST persecution and genocide of any group anywhere on the planet the last 20 years, but why do that when there is a narrative they have to uphold.

I'm uncertain if fake news is as bad as flat out not reporting the news which more than 2/3 of the world is seeing. New Fox is great at both.

[TheSanityAnnex]

OK, they sounded bitter as fuck on that tweet. :lol

Why are you laughing? :lol

[hater]

Yeah,cnn fucked up there hater. They should've owned it

Yup

I still remember Wolf Dipsticker ridiculing Dr Ron Paul on live tv

And Christiane Ammanpout often arriving in countries days before their presidents are couped

[Blake]

It is

For years CNN has been acting like kingmakers and they were so sold out to Clintler. Wikileaks exposed their reporters and they never admitted to any fault. Still havent.

Fuck them.

No it's not funny the president has such a sensitive thin skin that he is crying and whining about news media reporting facts about him he doesn't like.

They're gonna fuck him.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No it's not funny the president has such a sensitive thin skin that he is crying and whining about news media reporting facts about him he doesn't like.

They're gonna fuck him.
They tried to fuck him for a year straight, how'd that work out?

[baseline bum]

They tried to fuck him for a year straight, how'd that work out?

:lol

Trump acts like the media should treat him like he's Dear Leader.

[Spurminator]

President of the United States can't handle tough questions. What a coddled pussy.

[Thread]

President of the United States can't handle tough questions. What a coddled pussy.

Why anyone in their right mind would get into bed with somebody who doesn't have their best interests at heart continues to amaze me. Fine, that isn't CNN's motive, or, job. Got no problem, but, I'd be damned if I'd dance with that person. No. Get away from me.

It's like that idiot Barkley, paling up with Jordan in the '93 Finals. Jordan walked him right to the rocks and then bashed his head in with a nice sized one. What a dumb fuck. Now he has to sit on those TV sets without a ring. Now, NOW, he sees the error of his ways and can do nary a thing about it.

[Winehole23]

They tried to fuck him for a year straight, how'd that work out?if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

[Winehole23]

never saw a president bellyache so much

[Thread]

never saw a president bellyache so much

Kicking them out of that gaggle really got their goat. tee, hee.

[z0sa]

Yeah,cnn fucked up there hater. They should've owned it

Yup.

Until they admit to their collusion with the DNC it is hard to feel sorry for them, even if I still think theyre the best cable news station except for racist Van Jones.

[spurraider21]

Yup.

Until they admit to their collusion with the DNC it is hard to feel sorry for them, even if I still think theyre the best cable news station except for racist Van Jones.
:cry whitelash

That crybaby actually had a segment where he sat down with trump voters :cry so he can understand how this happened :cry

[rmt]

Yep - had to tolerate 4 days of watching only CNN when in Canada for funeral - no wonder my Canadian relatives (with the exception of the Christian, homeschooling couple) despise Trump so if this is all they listen to.

[Spurminator]

Yep - had to tolerate 4 days of watching only CNN when in Canada for funeral - no wonder my Canadian relatives (with the exception of the Christian, homeschooling couple) despise Trump so if this is all they listen to.

They might just despise him because he's a buffoon who was elected president by appealing to the fears and prejudices of stupid people.

[Winehole23]

DJT's bullying demeanor, furtive self-dealing, navel-gazing and childish complaining don't endear him to everyone either.

[Winehole23]

POTUS acts like an asshole. Graceless to the max.

[Winehole23]

being a crook, the biggest and most brazen one ever to hold high office in the US, is the worst of it. DJT will be the first president in a long time to directly enrich himself in the course of his duties.

[baseline bum]

Yep - had to tolerate 4 days of watching only CNN when in Canada for funeral - no wonder my Canadian relatives (with the exception of the Christian, homeschooling couple) despise Trump so if this is all they listen to.

Or maybe they're just better informed than you.

[Thread]

being a crook, the biggest and most brazen one ever to hold high office in the US, is the worst of it. DJT will be the first president in a long time to directly enrich himself in the course of his duties.

...Ain't nothing wrong with that.

[Winehole23]

sure there is. it's the definition of corruption and deprives the public of honest service.

[Thread]

sure there is. it's the definition of corruption and deprives the public of honest service.

Then they should have made it unlawful. Your morning after regret is moot.

[Winehole23]

the remedy is political. impeachment or not getting reelected.

regrets are powerful: look who they got elected.

[rmt]

They might just despise him because he's a buffoon who was elected president by appealing to the fears and prejudices of stupid people.

This might just be the Dems' problem - painting millions and millions of people with broad strokes and unflattering names.

[Winehole23]

so no, it isn't moot. there'll be another election in a little over three years.

there's also the possibility Congress will get sick of DJT's bullshit and shitcan him.

[Winehole23]

This might just be the Dems' problem - painting millions and millions of people with broad strokes and unflattering names.funny, your side does exactly the same thing

[rmt]

Or maybe they're just better informed than you.

Do you really think Canadian citizens who listen to only CNN are better informed about US politics or Trump than I am?

[rmt]

funny, your side does exactly the same thing

I don't remember Trump calling millions and millions of Americans deplorable, irredeemable or stupid (as you just did).

[Winehole23]

Canada has its own media outlets. Very odd to suggest they rely on US cable news.

[Winehole23]

I don't remember Trump calling millions and millions of Americans deplorable, irredeemable or stupid (as you just did).I didn't, and I wasn't talking about Trump. I guess you don't follow his supporters trend of posting here.

[Winehole23]

I didn't call anyone deplorable, irredeemable and stupid.

[Winehole23]

By the way, you never explained how Trump can pay for his basket of goodies, improve healthcare for all and cut taxes without increasing debt or the deficit.

how will he do it?

[Spurminator]

This might just be the Dems' problem - painting millions and millions of people with broad strokes and unflattering names.

Snowflake

[Winehole23]

how will Trump bring back jobs lost mainly to automation and technological rationalization of work?

[rmt]

I didn't, and I wasn't talking about Trump. I guess you don't follow his supporters trend of posting here.

My sincere apologies. That was Spurminator. Too giddy about the ease of reading and posting after weeks of that phishing thing. And nope, I don't pay much attention to who posts what - easier to maintain detachment when the name calling and insults fly (not saying that you do that).

[Spurminator]

My sincere apologies. That was Spurminator. Too giddy about the ease of reading and posting after weeks of that phishing thing. And nope, I don't pay much attention to who posts what - easier to maintain detachment when the name calling and insults fly (not saying that you do that).

You are not required to be insulted when someone calls a group of people stupid, assuming the rationale for calling them stupid doesn't apply to you. Not every trump voter is stupid. The ones who were primarily motivated by his untenable ideas about how to keep America safe? Different story.

[baseline bum]

Do you really think Canadian citizens who listen to only CNN are better informed about US politics or Trump than I am?

Yes

[tlongII]

being a crook, the biggest and most brazen one ever to hold high office in the US, is the worst of it. DJT will be the first president in a long time to directly enrich himself in the course of his duties.

As long as he enriches me too I'm cool with it.

[Reck]

Conservative provocateur James O'Keefe said Tuesday that he plans to release "hundreds of hours of tape" he said would expose CNN.

Speaking with Fox News host Sean Hannity in a radio interview on Tuesday, O'Keefe said he had accrued the unaired footage inside CNN's newsrooms from employees, according to reports from the network itself (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL21vbmV5LmNubi5jb20vMjAxNy8wMi8yMi9tZWR pYS9qYW1lcy1va2VlZmUtY25uLwA-/RS=%5EADA6EnnA_PSdns5vkyo6K85VfSjjJA-) and The Huffington Post (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5odWZmaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vZW50cnk vamFtZXMtb2tlZWZlLWxlYWtzLW5ld3Nyb29tLWZvb3RhZ2Vfd XNfNThhY2I2ZTllNGIwNGEwYjI3NGRkZGYyAA--/RS=%5EADAZkvzdEFX029clnCY1yCP4d4mvAY-).
He also alluded to releasing the obtained footage "WikiLeaks-style," or in systematic batches. Some of the footage is scheduled to be released on Thursday afternoon, O'Keefe said. He said it centers on "one corporation, multiple newsrooms."
O'Keefe's planned exposé follows a tenuous month during which President Donald Trump, his staff, and allies have devoted much airtime in criticizing and labeling CNN (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3RoZWhpbGwuY29tL2hvbWVuZXdzL2FkbWluaXN 0cmF0aW9uLzMxMzc3Ny10cnVtcC1iZXJhdGVzLWNubi1yZXBvc nRlci1mb3ItZmFrZS1uZXdzAA--/RS=%5EADA51kfrJeUDneORuHbnfgr3.14sYU-) as "fake news."


"My audience, the American people, are deeply upset at the media," O'Keefe told CNN in a telephone interview. "We think our media needs to be held to account, and CNN is kind of the leader of that. CNN has a very important role as an arbiter of news."

"This is all legally recorded information," he said.


The purported leaks also come after O'Keefe's statements from last month's pre-inauguration party dubbed the "DeploraBall." (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5idXNpbmVzc2luc2lkZXIuY29tL2RlcGx vcmFiYWxsLWdvcC1hbHQtcmlnaHQtMjAxNy0xAA--/RS=%5EADAcOkZS3CtZIILMn47DJc6ejnLz8U-) At the event, he said he planned on "going after the media next" and even called his footage "CNN Leaks."
"We are inside their newsrooms," he said, according to (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wb2xpdGljby5jb20vbWFnYXppbmUvc3R vcnkvMjAxNy8wMS90cnVtcHMtY2FzdC1vZi1jaGFyYWN0ZXJzL XRha2VzLWEtYm93LTIxNDY3NQA-/RS=%5EADAdxnwbdrNSalaCdJHq6tvMOEr418-) Politico (http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1489074042/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wb2xpdGljby5jb20vbWFnYXppbmUvc3R vcnkvMjAxNy8wMS90cnVtcHMtY2FzdC1vZi1jaGFyYWN0ZXJzL XRha2VzLWEtYm93LTIxNDY3NQA-/RS=%5EADAdxnwbdrNSalaCdJHq6tvMOEr418-). He added he had spies "embedded in your institutions."

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/conservative-provocateur-james-okeefe-says-044730678.html

:lol will release on Thursday
:lol RIP CNN
:lol TSA left holding the bag again like the idiot he is. :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

He did release Thursday. I linked it in post #24, on Thursday.

[Reck]

He did release Thursday. I linked it in post #24, on Thursday.

My bad.

So you posted a link without explanation knowing no one would click on it.

Basically all this breaking news tapes are supposed to be bombshells but all I heard was background noise of people talking. Like he just stood there, hit record and got a bunch of background noise. LOL

[TheSanityAnnex]

My bad.

So you posted a link without explanation knowing no one would click on it.

Basically all this breaking news tapes are supposed to be bombshells but all I heard was background noise of people talking. Like he just stood there, hit record and got a bunch of background noise. LOL

The link was literally posted right after the article.
The link has O'Keefes website name in it.
The link even says CNN leaks part 1

[Reck]

The link was literally posted right after the article.
The link has O'Keefes website name in it.
The link even says CNN leaks part 1

1. And?
2. O who? Not everyone travels in the same circle of conspiracy as you.
3. Again, and? It was a random site I didn't recognize.

Nice attempt at trying to deflect any of what was actually in my post though.

Where is the breaking news? Bombshells
Why isn't CNN buried?
Where are the actual tapes with people discussing the evil plans?

Answer these.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Let's take a look at "any of what was actually in your post"


Basically all this breaking news tapes are supposed to be bombshells but all I heard was background noise of people talking. Like he just stood there, hit record and got a bunch of background noise. LOL

There is nothing of substance there to respond to, certainly nothing to deflect from. You're basically just talking out loud to yourself.

[Reck]

Let's take a look at "any of what was actually in your post"



There is nothing of substance there to respond to, certainly nothing to deflect from. You're basically just talking out loud to yourself.

LMAO dumb.

I broke it down for you on the previous post and you still cant come up with any sort of answer.

[Winehole23]

As long as he enriches me too I'm cool with it.of course. Public service is passe.

[Winehole23]

My sincere apologies. That was Spurminator. Too giddy about the ease of reading and posting after weeks of that phishing thing. And nope, I don't pay much attention to who posts what - easier to maintain detachment when the name calling and insults fly (not saying that you do that).Accepted, thanks.

I try to stick to ideas but as you have readily admitted, it's challenging.

[Winehole23]

How will Trump pay for his promises, reduce the deficit and keep us out of debt? Still don't see it.

[Winehole23]

Sticking it to libs doesn't get him across the finish line. Not even close.

[Thread]

Sticking it to libs doesn't get him across the finish line. Not even close.

He's burning both ends of the candle. As long as he mushes along like that I've no problem with it.

[StrengthAndHonor]

The two aren't even analogous. Trump isn't censoring CNN. He's just told them to fuck off. They are free to print anything they desire and are free to disseminate their message to anyone who is willing to look at it. The only difference is that CNN will have to do actual journalism, and talk to people. Lol.

[Thread]

The two aren't even analogous. Trump isn't censoring CNN. He's just told them to fuck off. They are free to print anything they desire and are free to disseminate their message to anyone who is willing to look at it. The only difference is that CNN will have to do actual journalism, and talk to people. Lol.

Exactly. Trump never said Media is the enemy of the American people. Trump said FAKE NEWS Media is the enemy of the American people.

[Winehole23]

Actually, that's spin. Bannon, Spicer and Trump all said the media was the opposition.

[Winehole23]

Ir's bullshit to claim all the coverage you don't like is fake. DJT ain't perfect. Far from it. Nobody is.

[Winehole23]

He's burning both ends of the candle. As long as he mushes along like that I've no problem with it.of course you don't. You just care about you.

[Thread]

Actually, that's spin. Bannon, Spicer and Trump all said the media was the opposition.

Spin my ass. The Tweet in question is plainly spelled out. Media twisted it to suit their needs. In other words:::FAKE NEWS

[StrengthAndHonor]

Exactly. Trump never said Media is the enemy of the American people. Trump said FAKE NEWS Media is the enemy of the American people.
Correct.

And it isn't censorship. Their content isn't being filtered by the govenrment. Their ability to enter a room is.

[Winehole23]

Even Fox news says that's bullshit.

[Winehole23]

" the American people" isn't just those who like Trump and voted for him. It's everybody.

[Thread]

Even Fox news says that's bullshit.

Because they're not about to double cross Media. I've said that where CNN talks from the heart, they don't need a script...that FOX needs that script because their heart is the heart of CNN. You can see it in their eyes and in their cadence. They no more believe what they're saying than the man in the moon.

[StrengthAndHonor]

:lol.zzz

Typical that liberals do not understand the constitution. It guarantees the right to individual liberty and free speech. Ironically, it's this very principal that grants the Trump administration the right to decide who will be inside THEIR press meetings! Visiting the White House press room is not a right guaranteed to any of you. It is an extreme PRIVILEGE and an ALLOWANCE granted to those special "esteemed" press members, as decided by the White House.

[Winehole23]

The folks who disagree with you are not less American or patriotic just because they disagree.

[Winehole23]

It doesn't matter if the WH enforces access according to favorable coverage, the guild will share everything.

[Thread]

" the American people" isn't just those who like Trump and voted for him. It's everybody.

Absolutely. But, that 65 million isn't on board, hole. They're diametrically opposed to the 62 million that are on board. Obama didn't cater to the losing side. And made no bones about it. At least Trump hasn't insulted the 65 million like Obama insulted the losing side.

[Thread]

It doesn't matter if the WH enforces access according to favorable coverage, the guild will share everything.

And that's fine. But, I don't blame Trump for barring them from his "bed." I wouldn't let anybody that loathes me, that lies about me into my bed. No. I'll surround myself with people who are going to treat me decent and honestly. And if I were Trump I'd state it just like that. "I am not stopping you from doing your job, but, I will not permit you to be around me. And that's just the way it's going to be."

[StrengthAndHonor]

And that's fine. But, I don't blame Trump for barring them from his "bed." I wouldn't let anybody that loathes me, that lies about me into my bed. No. I'll surround myself with people who are going to treat me decent and honestly. And if I were Trump I'd state it just like that. "I am not stopping you from doing your job, but, I will not permit you to be around me. And that's just the way it's going to be."

It's just common sense. Why invite someone to your house if you knew they would trash you or produce Fake news on you when they left?


If they stopped being huge pieces of garbage, then maybe they could go back in. Cant let the dogs keep crapping on the floor.

[Winehole23]

How petty and small. I can't recall any other president with such a thin skin.

[Winehole23]

Nixon maybe, but DJT puts him in the shade.

[Winehole23]

Absolutely. But, that 65 million isn't on board, hole. They're diametrically opposed to the 62 million that are on board. Obama didn't cater to the losing side. And made no bones about it. At least Trump hasn't insulted the 65 million like Obama insulted the losing side.Ha. You're deluded.

[Thread]

How petty and small. I can't recall any other president with such a thin skin.

I agree, they all took it. Cept Trump.

One has to when they're on the shit end of the stick. But, when you're free & clear there is no way I'd chum with them, portending that everything is hunky & dory. Spicer insists on doing it. Time & again they walk him to the rocks and bash his head in. "Hey, Sean, they ain't your friend. They want to see your ruination. Answer the question once. From then on, A&A and call on the next asshole in the line."

Trying to make friends with people who want to destroy you is madness. I do not understand it.

[Winehole23]

Too bad. DJT needs more friends. He ciuld at least tey to be charming. Sincerity isn't everything; pretense counts, but DJT ain't even trying. He'll regret it.

[Winehole23]

It ain't all about him. He needs collaborators who ain't already on his side. The USG is vast.

[Thread]

Too bad. DJT needs more friends. He ciuld at least tey to be charming. Sincerity isn't everything; pretense counts, but DJT ain't even trying. He'll regret it.

He's got his blood line. That's all the [friends] one needs, or, can count on.

Look at that asshole Gorsuch, sells out Trump as soon as somebody gooses him.
Look at that asshole McMaster sells out Trump as soon as he gets a couple miles from him.

Trump has his kidsPERIOD And that's all you need.

[Thread]

It ain't all about him. He needs collaborators who ain't already on his side. The USG is vast.

And he's telling them:::just do your fuckin' job. Get to work and quit fuckin' around.

[Winehole23]

DHS just told him to get screwed. They won't be the last.

[Winehole23]

So did Comey. Executive branch ain't his kids.

[Winehole23]

If DJT keeps being an arrogant bully the legislative branch will bow up too.

[Winehole23]

There are downsides to being an arrogant asshole undreamt of in your philosophy, Thread.

[ElNono]

Yep - had to tolerate 4 days of watching only CNN when in Canada for funeral - no wonder my Canadian relatives (with the exception of the Christian, homeschooling couple) despise Trump so if this is all they listen to.

Most eligible voters in America do too. Certainly not a Canada-only phenomenon, tbh...

Oh, and, Trump president not Clinton

[rasuo214]

How petty and small. I can't recall any other president with such a thin skin.


Barack Obama?

All of this stuff is deja vu.

Trump's taxes = Obama's Birth Certificate

Angry Protests = Tea Party

Trump and Russia = Obama is a Muslim

etc.

[Winehole23]

Not even close.

Obama had many faults as a president, but being a crybaby and nursing petty vendettas related to unfavorable coverage wasn't one of them.

[unleashbaynes]

Not even close.

Obama had many faults as a president, but being a crybaby and nursing petty vendettas related to unfavorable coverage wasn't one of them.

:cry quit letting people know what a piece of shit i am :cry

[Adam Lambert]

Barack Obama?

All of this stuff is deja vu.

Trump's taxes = Obama's Birth Certificate

Angry Protests = Tea Party

Trump and Russia = Obama is a Muslim

etc.

what about the trump admins daily public temper tantrums? whats the obama parallel to that, dumbshit?

[Thread]

what about the trump admins daily public temper tantrums? whats the obama parallel to that, dumbshit?

Hussein Obama pleading with Ferguson PD not to release that video of the Gentle Giant committing a strong arm robbery moments before he was sent to live with Jesus full time.

Hussein Obama claiming he was half white till he was sworn then claiming he was all black thereafter.

Hussein Obama stating that gang banger that got smoked would be his son if he had one.

Hussein Obama standing by while his wife shamed this country. Turns out he was only waiting his turn.

[rasuo214]

Not even close.

Obama had many faults as a president, but being a crybaby and nursing petty vendettas related to unfavorable coverage wasn't one of them.

Fox News? Obviously it's a lot easier when the majority of the media is fawning over you like you're a god who can't do anything wrong.

[rasuo214]

what about the trump admins daily public temper tantrums? whats the obama parallel to that, dumbshit?

You're the great list maker, figure it out yourself.

[Adam Lambert]

Hussein Obama pleading with Ferguson PD not to release that video of the Gentle Giant committing a strong arm robbery moments before he was sent to live with Jesus full time.

Hussein Obama claiming he was half white till he was sworn then claiming he was all black thereafter.

Hussein Obama stating that gang banger that got smoked would be his son if he had one.

Hussein Obama standing by while his wife shamed this country. Turns out he was only waiting his turn.

those dont sound like temper tantrums, mate. those sound like "things that annoyed me"

[Adam Lambert]

You're the great list maker, figure it out yourself.

nah man i was seeing if youd finish yours

[rmt]

OT: encounter with Dirk fan at WalMart

I'm sitting on a bench waiting for dh's medication and 2 kids (probably 8 and 11 years old - not 4 year olds) are sitting on the laminate floor throwing/bouncing cans of peanuts on the floor. So I say to them, "I think you're gonna damage the floor doing that." Their dad/relative sitting next to me says, "Walmart can afford to replace the whole floor" So I say, "Isn't that gonna raise prices for both you and me?" And he says, "They probably gonna raise prices anyway" and lets them continue throwing the cans. SMH

[rasuo214]

nah man i was seeing if youd finish yours

Trump temper tantrums = Obama crying

[Adam Lambert]

Trump temper tantrums = Obama crying

link to obama crying about being criticized

[rasuo214]

link to obama crying about being criticized


what about the trump admins daily public temper tantrums? whats the obama parallel to that, dumbshit?

[Adam Lambert]

why are you quoting two of my posts instead of explaining your retarded false equivalency?

nothing obama ever said was as ridiculous as half of the shit your current president tweets on a daily basis.

[DarrinS]

Ben Stein goes off on CNN


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vACfwwisps8

[Blake]

Barack Obama?

All of this stuff is deja vu.

Trump's taxes = Obama's Birth Certificate

Angry Protests = Tea Party

Trump and Russia = Obama is a Muslim

etc.

Terrible attempt at equivalence

[rmt]

Ben Stein goes off on CNN


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vACfwwisps8

LOL - this lady sees the SC nominee as CNN giving GOOD coverage about Trump - more likely crowing about his comments about Trump.

Then he falls into her trap connecting situation with Trump to Nixon/Watergate - negates all the previous stuff he said about msm smearing Trump.

[rasuo214]

why are you quoting two of my posts instead of explaining your retarded false equivalency?

nothing obama ever said was as ridiculous as half of the shit your current president tweets on a daily basis.

I didn't say Obama = Trump, I said a lot of this is deja vu because of how the left is acting a lot like the right did when Obama was elected.

Stupid requests for documentation

Angry protests

Crazy conspiracies.

[Reck]

Crazy conspiracies.

Of which conspiracies are you referring to?

[spurraider21]

Lol Ben stein

[rasuo214]

Of which conspiracies are you referring to?

The Russian shit, Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

[Th'Pusher]

The Russian shit, Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war

[Reck]

The Russian shit, Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

The FBI is conducting several investigations into Russian hacking the election. That's not a conspiracy. It's a fact.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02-15/u-s-spy-agencies-fbi-said-to-probe-trump-team-s-russia-calls

[rasuo214]

The FBI is conducting several investigations into Russian hacking the election. That's not a conspiracy. It's a fact.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02-15/u-s-spy-agencies-fbi-said-to-probe-trump-team-s-russia-calls

First of all investigating something does not make it a fact. Second did you read the article? They are investigating Russian influence not whether the elections were hacked.


The FBI has two parallel ongoing investigations, one official said. A counterintelligence investigation is looking at Russian espionage activities and to what extent, if any, they involve communications with or collusion by U.S. officials. The second, a cybersecurity investigation, is probing the hacking of U.S. political groups and operatives.

There is no evidence that the elections were hacked, let alone that the Russians were involved. So yes it is a conspiracy.

[rasuo214]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war


I are 2 stoopid to read artcle. :rolleyes

[Reck]

There is no evidence that the elections were hacked, let alone that the Russians were involved. So yes it is a conspiracy.

Koolaid drinker.

Why dont I let one of your own inform you..

Minute 1:55 if you're too lazy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOasJvE3kbo

[DarrinS]

Hacking and collusion are different. Keep digging

[rasuo214]

Koolaid drinker.

Why dont I let one of your own inform you..

Minute 1:55 if you're too lazy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOasJvE3kbo

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you're confusing Russian influence or hacking the DNC/Podesta emails with hacking the election. Just so you know, they are completely different things. Here I'll help you out with the following questions:


Which states were hacked? Which systems were hacked? What were the vulnerabilities? Have they been corrected? How did the Russians accomplish this? How did this impact the votes, did the hacking suppress votes/inflate etc.

[DMC]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war

:lol say one of the sloppiest, least educated posters on the forum, the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

[Reck]

Hacking and collusion are different. Keep digging


I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you're confusing Russian influence or hacking the DNC/Podesta emails with hacking the election. Just so you know, they are completely different things. Here I'll help you out with the following questions:


Which states were hacked? Which systems were hacked? What were the vulnerabilities? Have they been corrected? How did the Russians accomplish this? How did this impact the votes, did the hacking suppress votes/inflate etc.

Lol dipshits.

Specially you Darrin. What a retard. :lol

I just posted the vid of him saying it. A top republican. Those words are not coming out of my mouth.

As for all your questions, why don't we let the FBI and senate committee finish their investigations into Russia?

[Spurminator]

Is the argument that somehow collusion in our election is better than hacking?

[rasuo214]

Lol dipshits.

Specially you Darrin. What a retard. :lol

I just posted the vid of him saying it. A top republican. Those words are not coming out of my mouth.

As for all your questions, why don't we let the FBI and senate committee finish their investigations into Russia?

Ok I was giving you the benefit of the doubt but now you are confirming that you are in fact an idiot.

[Th'Pusher]

:lol say one of the sloppiest, least educated posters on the forum, the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

:rolleyes

[rasuo214]

Is the argument that somehow collusion in our election is better than hacking?

I wasn't making any arguments. All I said was that it was a conspiracy that the Russians hacked the elections. Reck, like the idiot that he is, took the bait.

[DMC]

:rolleyes

You drooling faggot, going around trying to talk down to people from your subservient life position. What a tool :lol

[Reck]

Ok I was giving you the benefit of the doubt but now you are confirming that you are in fact an idiot.

Rich. I'm the idiot while you claim everything is a conspiracy. Ok then.

[rasuo214]

Rich. I'm the idiot while you claim everything is a conspiracy. Ok then.

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy. Go back to one of your progressive circle jerks so you can feel enlightened.

[Reck]

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy. Go back to one of your progressive circle jerks so you can feel enlightened.

TSA in drags. :lol

[rasuo214]

The Russians hacked the election. Fact because investigations on alleged Russian influence. Duh, idiots. :downspin: :lol

[Adam Lambert]

I didn't say Obama = Trump, I said a lot of this is deja vu because of how the left is acting a lot like the right did when Obama was elected.

Stupid requests for documentation

Angry protests

Crazy conspiracies.

no you said the last president with skin as thin as trumps was obama

[TheSanityAnnex]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war

"Critics of the report have repeatedly noted that intelligence agencies, in the months before the Iraq War, endorsed faulty assessments concerning weapons of mass destruction. But the intelligence community was deeply divided over the actual extent of Iraq’s weapons development; the question of Russia’s responsibility for cyberattacks in the 2016 election has produced no such tumult. Seventeen federal intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia was responsible for the hacking."

I tried to appreciate it but had to stop reading after this.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy.

His idiocy is what stops him from admitting he was wrong as he truly believes he is right.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/06/trump-putin-and-the-new-cold-war

Maybe you will appreciate it.

https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/

[Reck]

His idiocy is what stops him from admitting he was wrong as he truly believes he is right.

:lol Replying to yourself. Faggotness intensifies. :lol

[rasuo214]

no you said the last president with skin as thin as trumps was obama

I did, but the comparisons were about how the supporters reacted to each president. Obama was fairly thin-skinned and didn't respond well to criticism (Fox News). Luckily for him he was mostly loved by the media and wasn't called a Fascist/Anti-Semite 2 months into his presidency.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lol Replying to yourself. Faggotness intensifies. :lol
:lol thinking that's my alt
:lol further confirming your idiocy

[TheSanityAnnex]

I did, but the comparisons were about how the supporters reacted to each president. Obama was fairly thin-skinned and didn't respond well to criticism (Fox News). Luckily for him he was mostly loved by the media and wasn't called a Fascist/Anti-Semite 2 months into his presidency.
Apparently the political forum dunce thinks we are the same poster

[rasuo214]

:lol Replying to yourself. Faggotness intensifies. :lol

:lol At thinking we're the same person. Who else would dare call you out for being an idiot? Right? Clearly has to be the same person. :lol

[rasuo214]

Apparently the political forum dunce thinks we are the same poster

Oh shit we're posting at the same time. Clearly this confirms it. :downspin:

[Reck]

:lol posting in unison.

TSA, the troll game is not for you. You dont know how to do it. You're too transparent and stupid to pull it off. rofl

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lol posting in unison.

TSA, the troll game is not for you. You dont know how to do it. You're too transparent and stupid to pull it off. rofl

The only stupid one here is the one who thinks I am posting from two accounts.

[Reck]

Talks about crazy conspiracy=CHECK
Likes to answer questions with another question=CHECK
Likes to break down posts point by point=CHECK
Gets defensive with the snap of a finger=CHECK
Claims he's not for Trump but semen shields for him every post=CHECK

:lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

hey dipshit, want to bet your account that we are not the same poster?

[Reck]

There he is flying off the handle. :lmao

Deny! Deny! Deny!

:lmao

[Th'Pusher]

You drooling faggot, going around trying to talk down to people from your subservient life position. What a tool :lol

:rolleyes

[rasuo214]

Talks about crazy conspiracy=CHECK
Likes to answer questions with another question=CHECK
Likes to break down posts point by point=CHECK
Gets defensive with the snap of a finger=CHECK
Claims he's not for Trump but semen shields for him every post=CHECK

:lol

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as hell if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

[TheSanityAnnex]

There he is flying off the handle. :lmao

Deny! Deny! Deny!

:lmao

Do you want to bet your account we aren't the same poster?

[Th'Pusher]

"Critics of the report have repeatedly noted that intelligence agencies, in the months before the Iraq War, endorsed faulty assessments concerning weapons of mass destruction. But the intelligence community was deeply divided over the actual extent of Iraq’s weapons development; the question of Russia’s responsibility for cyberattacks in the 2016 election has produced no such tumult. Seventeen federal intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia was responsible for the hacking."

I tried to appreciate it but had to stop reading after this.

Did the USIC not put out this statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".

[Reck]

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as hell if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

I was? Read my OP to you, I asked you the question of what was conspiratorial about the Russia thing.

:lol I'm behind an alt. :lol

[Reck]

Do you want to bet your account we aren't the same poster?

No need.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as hell if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

I don't have the creativity to create an alt with the daily stupidity that comes from Reck.

[Reck]

I don't have the creativity to create an alt with the daily stupidity that comes from Reck.

Says the guy that has a 40+ pedo pizza conspiracy thread? Sad

[TheSanityAnnex]

Did the USIC not put out this statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".
NSA wasn't confident. FBI wasn't even allowed in the DNC servers. The entire USIC investigation was based off a Clinton funded CrowdStrike report. The USIC report was shredded by private sector security experts.

[rasuo214]

I was? Read my OP to you, I asked you the question of what was conspiratorial about the Russia thing.

:lol I'm behind an alt. :lol

I said both sides believed in conspiracy theories about each president. Not that I believed in them. You asked what I thought was a conspiracy theory. I listed them and you proceeded to defend a conspiracy theory over several posts. So yes it was you who was discussing conspiracy theories. BTW my alt comment was sarcasm.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No need.

No need to be a pussy. It's time for once you stood behind one of your idiotic claims.

[Th'Pusher]

NSA wasn't confident. FBI wasn't even allowed in the DNC servers. The entire USIC investigation was based off a Clinton funded CrowdStrike report. The USIC report was shredded by private sector security experts.

Did the private sector security experts see the classified report? Did Donald Trump go from questioning Russia's involvement to begrudgingly accepting Russia was responsible for the hacking and shifting his position to "but it had no effect on the outcome of the election" after reading/having the classified report read to him?

I can appreciate The Intercept's position as the evidence that was publicly made available was lacking (which was also acknowledged in the New Yorker article) and I agree the American people deserve that information. But absent that evidence, and considering the fact that there is no person or agency that had had access to the classified report that still denies Russia was responsible for the hacking, I draw my own conclusions. If you can provide a person/agency that had access to the classified report that denies Russia was responsible, I'll happily concede the point.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Did the private sector security experts see the classified report? Did Donald Trump go from questioning Russia's involvement to begrudgingly accepting Russia was responsible for the hacking and shifting his position to "but it had no effect on the outcome of the election" after reading/having the classified report read to him?

I can appreciate The Intercept's position as the evidence that was publicly made available was lacking (which was also acknowledged in the New Yorker article) and I agree the American people deserve that information. But absent that evidence, and considering the fact that there is no person or agency that had had access to the classified report that still denies Russia was responsible for the hacking, I draw my own conclusions. If you can provide a person/agency that had access to the classified report that denies Russia was responsible, I'll happily concede the point.

The classified report was all based off the Clinton funded CrowdStrike report.

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

Multiple people well versed in security and intelligence read the exact same report and called bullshit on the DNI findings. Remember that in the DNI the NSA had the least amount of confidence attributing to Russia.

“According to William Binney (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-16/nsa-whistleblower-destroys-obamas-russia-narrative-hard-evidence-points-inside-leak-) (former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA), the NSA’s “extensive domestic data-collection network,” any data removed remotely from Hillary Clinton or DNC servers would have passed over fiber networks and therefore would have been captured by the NSA who could have then analyzed packet data to determine the origination point and destination address of those packets.”



These are pretty good articles. 2nd one absolutely shits on CrowdStrike.

Part 1
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-say-hello-fancy-bear-2.html

Part 2
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-2-dni-report-faked-sources.html

[Th'Pusher]

The classified report was all based off the Clinton funded CrowdStrike report.

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

Multiple people well versed in security and intelligence read the exact same report and called bullshit on the DNI findings. Remember that in the DNI the NSA had the least amount of confidence attributing to Russia.

“According to William Binney (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-16/nsa-whistleblower-destroys-obamas-russia-narrative-hard-evidence-points-inside-leak-) (former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA), the NSA’s “extensive domestic data-collection network,” any data removed remotely from Hillary Clinton or DNC servers would have passed over fiber networks and therefore would have been captured by the NSA who could have then analyzed packet data to determine the origination point and destination address of those packets.”



These are pretty good articles. 2nd one absolutely shits on CrowdStrike.

Part 1
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-say-hello-fancy-bear-2.html

Part 2
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-2-dni-report-faked-sources.html





So you cant provide anybody that had access to the classified report that denies Russia was responsible for the hacking?

How do you explain Donald's shift from questioning Russia's responsibility to accepting they were responsible after being briefed on the classified report?

Can you name a single person in the Trump Administration, any active members of an intelligence agency or any member of congress that still denies Russia was responsible?

[TheSanityAnnex]

So you cant provide anybody that had access to the classified report that denies Russia was responsible for the hacking?

How do you explain Donald's shift from questioning Russia's responsibility to accepting they were responsible after being briefed on the classified report?

Can you name a single person in the Trump Administration, any active members of an intelligence agency or any member of congress that still denies Russia was responsible?

Before moving forward do you agree the DNI report was based off the CrowdStrike report?

[Th'Pusher]

Before moving forward do you agree the DNI report was based off the CrowdStrike report?

I do not know that the classified report was based solely on the CrowdStrike report.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I do not know that the classified report was based solely on the CrowdStrike report.
Been reported on repeatedly. Read the two links above.

[Th'Pusher]

Been reported on repeatedly. Read the two links above.

There is nothing in either article that indicates the CroudStrike report was the sole source of information for the classified report.

[TheSanityAnnex]

There is nothing in either article that indicates the CroudStrike report was the sole source of information for the classified report.
I'll try and find where I read it tomorrow if it wasn't in those two links, thought it was.

quick glance at the 2nd link had this and we know FBI wasn't allowed to analyze the servers.

"The FBI report is based solely on Crowdstrike’s evidence which has become a laughing stock across the cyber security industry. Cyber security professionals are standing up saying how laughable Dimitri Alperovitch’s information is. For there to be any evidence of a hack, the DNI report has to use the FBI report and Crowdstrike’s evidence. This includes the tool X-Agent"

[Th'Pusher]

I'll try and find where I read it tomorrow if it wasn't in those two links, thought it was.

quick glance at the 2nd link had this and we know FBI wasn't allowed to analyze the servers.

"The FBI report is based solely on Crowdstrike’s evidence which has become a laughing stock across the cyber security industry. Cyber security professionals are standing up saying how laughable Dimitri Alperovitch’s information is. For there to be any evidence of a hack, the DNI report has to use the FBI report and Crowdstrike’s evidence. This includes the tool X-Agent"

Can you name a single person in the Trump Administration, any active members of an intelligence agency or any member of congress that still denies Russia was responsible?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Can you name a single person in the Trump Administration, any active members of an intelligence agency or any member of congress that still denies Russia was responsible?
Their statements have no bearing on whether or not it was actually Russia. If the "hack" came from Russia the NSA would be able to attribute it, and they haven't.

Can you name a single person from the NSA saying it was with out a doubt Russia?

think about this...

Because any possibility of a Russian hack at the DNC has been taken away, the rest of the DNI report comes across as a long political whine. The only 2 groups that are known to possess X-Agent are Crowdstrike and the Ukrainian hacker RUH8. The DNI report relies on both to hold their facts together. Both are discredited. The following admission should interest John Podesta.
According to a RFE/RL interview (http://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-hacktivist-network-cyberwar-on-kremlin/28091216.html), “RUH8 says the Cyber Alliance uses “all tools and methods” at its disposal to hack into their perceived foes’ accounts. In particular, he says, spear-phishing — using messages that mimic those of legitimate companies along with a request and link to change personal security information — “is quite efficient. People readily give up their passwords and personal info,” he says. “They receive something in their [e-]mail like, ‘Your account will be suspended if you don’t confirm [your security details].’ They click that link and we have them.”
Is it me or has RUH8 done everything except openly confess to hacking Podesta? Spear-fishing is the tactic said to be used in the DNC hacking. Only 2 known groups have the X-Agent and only RUH8 states openly that they changed the course of world geopolitics. Neither of them has been investigated. Security analysts are starting to speculate that if there was a hack, the Ukrainians probably did it. The self-identifying Pravy Sektor members RUH8 are also claiming to have hacked the Russian government email. When the facts are considered, RUH8 may have done a hack to cover up the Craig Murray leak.
The FBI now in charge of domestic intelligence didn’t investigate anything. All the evidence to prove a Russian hack has been shown clearly to be flawed and faked. Crowdstrike is guilty of at least perjury based on their own statements and the evidence they gave to the FBI. The DNI and 17 Intel agencies are relying on neo-nazi group hackers that openly mock them.
This only leaves only one scenario that has an unblemished track record. Julian Assange and Craig Murray told the truth. The emails were leaked.

[Th'Pusher]

Their statements have no bearing on whether or not it was actually Russia. If the "hack" came from Russia the NSA would be able to attribute it, and they haven't.

Can you name a single person from the NSA saying it was with out a doubt Russia?

think about this...

Because any possibility of a Russian hack at the DNC has been taken away, the rest of the DNI report comes across as a long political whine. The only 2 groups that are known to possess X-Agent are Crowdstrike and the Ukrainian hacker RUH8. The DNI report relies on both to hold their facts together. Both are discredited. The following admission should interest John Podesta.
According to a RFE/RL interview (http://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-hacktivist-network-cyberwar-on-kremlin/28091216.html), “RUH8 says the Cyber Alliance uses “all tools and methods” at its disposal to hack into their perceived foes’ accounts. In particular, he says, spear-phishing — using messages that mimic those of legitimate companies along with a request and link to change personal security information — “is quite efficient. People readily give up their passwords and personal info,” he says. “They receive something in their [e-]mail like, ‘Your account will be suspended if you don’t confirm [your security details].’ They click that link and we have them.”
Is it me or has RUH8 done everything except openly confess to hacking Podesta? Spear-fishing is the tactic said to be used in the DNC hacking. Only 2 known groups have the X-Agent and only RUH8 states openly that they changed the course of world geopolitics. Neither of them has been investigated. Security analysts are starting to speculate that if there was a hack, the Ukrainians probably did it. The self-identifying Pravy Sektor members RUH8 are also claiming to have hacked the Russian government email. When the facts are considered, RUH8 may have done a hack to cover up the Craig Murray leak.
The FBI now in charge of domestic intelligence didn’t investigate anything. All the evidence to prove a Russian hack has been shown clearly to be flawed and faked. Crowdstrike is guilty of at least perjury based on their own statements and the evidence they gave to the FBI. The DNI and 17 Intel agencies are relying on neo-nazi group hackers that openly mock them.
This only leaves only one scenario that has an unblemished track record. Julian Assange and Craig Murray told the truth. The emails were leaked.

Is the NSA a member of the USIC? Did the USIC put out this statement?

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".

Did the NSA come out and publicly reject the above statement once released by the USIC?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Is the NSA a member of the USIC? Did the USIC put out this statement?

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".

Did the NSA come out and publicly reject the above statement once released by the USIC?

The NSA reported the least amount of confidence it was Russia in the DNI report.

Again, find me one member of the NSA stating they are confident it was Russia.

If if it was a hack do you think the NSA would not be able to attribute? You are close to calling the NSA incompetent if you think this.

[Th'Pusher]

The NSA reported the least amount of confidence it was Russia in the DNI report.

Again, find me one member of the NSA stating they are confident it was Russia.

If if it was a hack do you think the NSA would not be able to attribute? You are close to calling the NSA incompetent if you think this.

The NSA said they had moderate confidence it was Russia.

[Reck]

The NSA said they had moderate confidence it was Russia.

LOL TSA.

The NSA Chief Says Russia Hacked the 2016 Election. Congress Must Investigate.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/will-congress-investigate-russian-interference-2016-campaign

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2017-01-06/nsa-has-moderate-confidence-in-russia-hacking-report

This dude thinks we live in the boomsticks where internet is limited to ST or something. :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

The NSA said they had moderate confidence it was Russia.
Correct.

Think about that considering this was claimed to have been a hack.

[TheSanityAnnex]

LOL TSA.

The NSA Chief Says Russia Hacked the 2016 Election. Congress Must Investigate.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/11/will-congress-investigate-russian-interference-2016-campaign

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2017-01-06/nsa-has-moderate-confidence-in-russia-hacking-report

This dude thinks we live in the boomsticks where internet is limited to ST or something. :lol

Actually he didn't say that. Nice try though.

"This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect."

[Reck]

Actually he didn't say that. Nice try though.

"This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect."




You and your selective reading. LOL

[TheSanityAnnex]

You and your selective reading. LOL

Is the word Russia anywhere in that quote?

[Reck]

Is the word Russia anywhere in that quote?

The subject they are talking about is. Are you pretending to be this dense or you just are?

Just because you dont see the world Russia doesn't mean that's not what they're talking about. :lmao

Fucking hell. Muahahahah

[Th'Pusher]

Correct.

Think about that considering this was claimed to have been a hack.

And? Moderate is average confidence. With the exception of the fringe corners of the internet, it's accepted that Russia was responsible for the hack. Note, I'm not on board with the Trump campaign colusion angle, but no one of any significance is actively denying Russia's responsibility for the hacking.

The fact that you actively promote pizzagate doesn't really help your case here, tbh. You're clearly prone to falling victim to conspiracies that appeal to your emotions and confirm your biases.

[Thread]

And? Moderate is average confidence. With the exception of the fringe corners of the internet, it's accepted that Russia was responsible for the hack. Note, I'm not on board with the Trump campaign colusion angle, but no one of any significance is actively denying Russia's responsibility for the hacking.

The fact that you actively promote pizzagate doesn't really help your case here, tbh. You're clearly prone to falling victim to conspiracies that appeal to your emotions and confirm your biases.

The whole (Russia hack) is complete nonsense. Just like Global Warming is complete nonsense.

[Th'Pusher]

The whole (Russia hack) is complete nonsense. Just like Global Warming is complete nonsense.

This trump fanboy, climate change and holocaust denier doesn't help your case either, TSA.

Sorry. Your opinion holds no regard

[Thread]

This trump fanboy, climate change and holocaust denier doesn't help your case either, TSA.

Sorry. Your opinion holds no regard

Then I'll not bother you with it henceforth.

[Th'Pusher]

Then I'll not bother you with it henceforth.

I was referring to TSA.

You can be amusing when you're not repetitive. Feel free to respond with an opinion. Or not. I can take or leave you...

[TheSanityAnnex]

And? Moderate is average confidence. With the exception of the fringe corners of the internet, it's accepted that Russia was responsible for the hack. Note, I'm not on board with the Trump campaign colusion angle, but no one of any significance is actively denying Russia's responsibility for the hacking.

The fact that you actively promote pizzagate doesn't really help your case here, tbh. You're clearly prone to falling victim to conspiracies that appeal to your emotions and confirm your biases.
So the private sector security professionals and former NSA officials are now just the fringe corners of the internet? lol

The NSA doesn't do "moderate" confidence. Again...

“According to William Binney (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-16/nsa-whistleblower-destroys-obamas-russia-narrative-hard-evidence-points-inside-leak-) (former Technical Director, World Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA), the NSA’s “extensive domestic data-collection network,” any data removed remotely from Hillary Clinton or DNC servers would have passed over fiber networks and therefore would have been captured by the NSA who could have then analyzed packet data to determine the origination point and destination address of those packets.”

[TheSanityAnnex]

The subject they are talking about is. Are you pretending to be this dense or you just are?

Just because you dont see the world Russia doesn't mean that's not what they're talking about. :lmao

Fucking hell. Muahahahah
Then you should have no problem finding a link to the NSA saying with complete confidence it was Russia. Go fetch.

[Th'Pusher]

The NSA said they had moderate confidence it was Russia.


Correct.

Think about that considering this was claimed to have been a hack.




The NSA doesn't do "moderate" confidence.

:wtf

[Thread]

I was referring to TSA.

You can be amusing when you're not repetitive. Feel free to respond with an opinion. Or not. I can take or leave you...

Fine. It must be difficult to be in your shoes. That you stay and fight over the issues is admirable.

[TheSanityAnnex]

:wtf
Lip service from the NSA. They know from where, who, and how it happened. They aren't going to squash the narrative dead in its tracks.

[Th'Pusher]

They aren't going to squash the narrative dead in its tracks.

Why?

[TSA]

https://media3.giphy.com/media/5mBE2MiMVFITS/200.gif#0-grid1


CNN's Acosta slammed for saying Trump held 'fake news conference'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/06/cnns-acosta-slammed-for-saying-trump-held-fake-news-conference.html


CNN boss in crosshairs if AT&T-Time Warner merger approved

http://nypost.com/2017/06/28/cnn-boss-in-crosshairs-if-att-time-warner-merger-approved/

[spurraider21]

CNN boss in crosshairs if AT&T-Time Warner merger approved

http://nypost.com/2017/06/28/cnn-boss-in-crosshairs-if-att-time-warner-merger-approved/

sources familiar with the thinking of AT&T brass.

and yet...


"sources familiar with Comey's thinking"

:lmao

[Adam Lambert]

tsa gets excited about the stupidest shit.

i cant believe this is your life. your happiness is literally based on what a bunch of virgin trolls are talking about in a given day.

[spurraider21]

"anonymous sources familiar with x's thinking" = :lmao if news is against my narrative
"anonymous sources familiar with x's thinking" = :wow if news aligns with my narrative

[TSA]

"sources familiar with x's thinking" = :lmao if news is against my narrative
"sources familiar with x's thinking" = :wow if news aligns with my narrative

:tu

[spurraider21]

:tu
https://i.gyazo.com/fd657dde2252a85f200e4bc932ab5af0.png

[TSA]

tsa gets excited about the stupidest shit.

i cant believe this is your life. your happiness is literally based on what a bunch of virgin trolls are talking about in a given day.

I'm a very happy person. I've got a job I enjoy that pays very well, a beautiful wife, and a baby boy on the way. Watching CNN crumble is icing on the cake.

If we are judging one's life based on their forum posting I feel sorry for you as you are constantly whining, bitching, and crying. Cheer up snowflake.

[TSA]

https://i.gyazo.com/fd657dde2252a85f200e4bc932ab5af0.png

>sports forum
>>political subsection
>>>wgaf

[Reck]

I'm a very happy person. I've got a job I enjoy that pays very well, a beautiful wife, and a baby boy on the way. Watching CNN crumble is icing on the cake.

If we are judging one's life based on their forum posting I feel sorry for you as you are constantly whining, bitching, and crying. Cheer up snowflake.

This kind of move wouldn't make CNN crumble anymore than what they are now.

Stations this big dont go anywhere. If that was the case then Fox would have been extinct ages ago.

I dont know how you can justify the existence of Fox as a legit news network but condemn CNN for pushing fake news.

One is better than the other one slightly. At worst, they're both the same and should be done away with.

Treat both as such if you're going to be condescending toward one network.

[Pavlov]

TSA big baby hypocrite.

[spurraider21]

>sports forum
>>political subsection
>>>wgaf
that's the weakest copout i've ever seen on ST

bravo

[TSA]

This kind of move wouldn't make CNN crumble anymore than what they are now.

Stations this big dont go anywhere. If that was the case then Fox would have been extinct ages ago.

I dont know how you can justify the existence of Fox as a legit news network but condemn CNN for pushing fake news.

One is better than the other one slightly. At worst, they're both the same and should be done away with.

Treat both as such if you're going to be condescending toward one network.

Typical liberal trying to force others to conform to their views. How about you treat both as such and I'll continue mocking CNN at my leisure.

[TSA]

that's the weakest copout i've ever seen on ST

bravo

:lol me thinks you take this subsection a bit too serious

[Pavlov]

How TSA lost his mind.

[spurraider21]

:lol me thinks you take this subsection a bit too serious
nah, ur just a chickenshit hypocrite

[Adam Lambert]

I'm a very happy person. I've got a job I enjoy that pays very well, a beautiful wife, and a baby boy on the way. Watching CNN crumble is icing on the cake.

If we are judging one's life based on their forum posting I feel sorry for you as you are constantly whining, bitching, and crying. Cheer up snowflake.


keep telling yourself that, you sad lonely dork.

TEEHEE OMG HOW AWESOME A CABLE NEWS CHANNEL IS BEING CRITICIZED SO HARD RIGHT NOW LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[Adam Lambert]

I just LOVE HOW MY DEAR LEADER KEEPS STICKING IT TO THE FREE PRESS
THERES NO WAY ITS A BAD THING IF CRITICS OF MY DEAR LEADER GET SHUT DOWN
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

[TSA]

nah, ur just a chickenshit hypocrite

I'd be a chickenshit if I denied it stupid fuck, which I didn't. We are all hypocrites at some point.

[Adam Lambert]

https://media3.giphy.com/media/5mBE2MiMVFITS/200.gif#0-grid1


CNN's Acosta slammed for saying Trump held 'fake news conference'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/06/cnns-acosta-slammed-for-saying-trump-held-fake-news-conference.html


CNN boss in crosshairs if AT&T-Time Warner merger approved

http://nypost.com/2017/06/28/cnn-boss-in-crosshairs-if-att-time-warner-merger-approved/


OMG HOW AWESOME DEAR LEADER CAN USE POLITICALLY MOTIVATED MERGERS TO SHUT DOWN CRITICS HOW COOL IS THAT GUYS???

(jacks off onto keyboard)

[Adam Lambert]

nothing gets me harder than the separation of powers dissolving. all hail dear leader!
-tsa

[TSA]

I just LOVE HOW MY DEAR LEADER KEEPS STICKING IT TO THE FREE PRESS
THERES NO WAY ITS A BAD THING IF CRITICS OF MY DEAR LEADER GET SHUT DOWN
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

CNN threatening to dox someone if they don't behave has nothing to do with them being critical of Trump.

ALL CAPS TRIGGERED :rollin