Decetive site

[Wild Cobra]

Just got a security warning about this site being a deceptive site!

Anyone else?

[benefactor]

Yep...got it this morning too.

[Reck]

Yeah wtf is that about? I was going to post about that.

The slovenian servers got aids or something?

[Reck]

Mine says it's a forgery. I have been clicking on ignore so I hope I didn't catch some malware and shit now.

http://i66.tinypic.com/2u6iws4.jpg

Also flushed my cashe and cookies just in case.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

You download the virus and watch the fireworks.

[Wild Cobra]

Looks like someone didn't like being shit on here, and reported it to the internet police.

I hate it when authority is abused.

[DarrinS]

I don't see this with Safari browser.

[hater]

Try making ur phone an access point niggas. And use a computer to connect to it. If your get redirected to a russian site, you are shit out of luck :lmao

[Wild Cobra]

I don't see this with Safari browser.

Then it is either a bad browser, or you don't have the security settings high enough to warn yo of legitimate bad sites.

[Wild Cobra]

Try making ur phone an access point niggas. And use a computer to connect to it. If your get redirected to a russian site, you are shit out of luck :lmao

I used to blame the gremlins when our equipment acted all wonky. Now I blame the Russians hacking into it.

[boutons_deux]

Chrome says this is untrustable site.

Is the server compromised? dropping shit on our machines?

Maybe Pootin's hackers compromised the server like he compromised Trash?

I'd be surprised if a single complaint would cause Google to make it untrustable.

[boutons_deux]

This is probably the reason:

http://www.zdnet.com/article/google-chrome-gets-ready-to-mark-all-http-sites-as-bad/

ST owner too cheap to buy a cert?

[DarrinS]

Then it is either a bad browser, or you don't have the security settings high enough to warn yo of legitimate bad sites.


Chome gives the warning

IE v.11 - no
Safari - no

[Reck]

I'm using Firefox and I still get the warning as posted above.

It's probably the outdated servers that's not keeping up with the latest hotfixes that browsers often get.

[Wild Cobra]

Chrome says this is untrustable site.

Is the server compromised? dropping shit on our machines?

Maybe Pootin's hackers compromised the server like he compromised Trash?

I'd be surprised if a single complaint would cause Google to make it untrustable.

Yep.

Putin has about as much interest in this server, and he did the DNC...

[Thread]

Yep.

Putin has about as much interest in this server, and he did the DNC...

WC

[florige]

I'm using Firefox and I still get the warning as posted above.

It's probably the outdated servers that's not keeping up with the latest hotfixes that browsers often get.


I've gotten this message with a few sites not just here. Not sure whats up with that.

[SnakeBoy]

Got it this morning. I reported ST as a safe site. So I basically lied.

[boutons_deux]

I've gotten this message with a few sites not just here. Not sure whats up with that.

the answer is in my post above.

[Wild Cobra]

I've gotten this message with a few sites not just here. Not sure whats up with that.

This is the only site I visit I have seen it on.

Doing some research, it appears someone is regularly posing phishing sites, other places that hack, or using this site for other felonious activity.

Be careful what you click on here, until the alert goes away.

I wish they were more specific.

[Reck]

Still getting this. Getting annoying.

[boutons_deux]

This is the only site I visit I have seen it on.

Doing some research, it appears someone is regularly posing phishing sites, other places that hack, or using this site for other felonious activity.

Be careful what you click on here, until the alert goes away.

I wish they were more specific.

You're wrong, as usual, it's Google trying to get websites, after months of warnings, to replace HTTP with HTTPS.

[cheguevara]

You're wrong, as usual, it's Google trying to get websites, after months of warnings, to replace HTTP with HTTPS.

The article you posted says they would mark it with a red cross next to the URL

The message when users hit Spurstalk is completely different it specifically says the site is deceptive. Totally different thing

My guess is our site was blacklisted due to the search results it produces through google. Most likely the NSA has algorithms that automatically blacklist sites. Probably the content of the Political Forum would trigger the NSA blacklist method.

This is all related to NSA and US government shutting down their so called "fake news" sites bullshit

I would not be surprised if the Pizzagate thread itself singlehandely triggered this site. It will be hard for anyone to have spurstalk removed now

[boutons_deux]

The article you posted says they would mark it with a red cross next to the URL

The message when users hit Spurstalk is completely different it specifically says the site is deceptive. Totally different thing



If visitor opts to proceed past the warning, Chrome replaces the URL/search bar with a red (warning sign + "Dangerous")

If ST owner would buy/install a cert, the Chrome warning would disappear, proving my points, proving you're wrong.

That so many sites had the danger warning on day Google started its project, you might have point, but you don't.

[cheguevara]

If visitor opts to proceed past the warning, Chrome replaces the URL/search bar with a red (warning sign + "Dangerous")

If ST owner would buy/install a cert, the Chrome warning would disappear, proving my points, proving you're wrong.

That so many sites had the danger warning on day Google started its project, you might have point, but you don't.

Google has many warnings. Its illogical they would use the "phishing" warning for sites not having https. Makes no sense.

Its like using a Stop sign when you want the driver to detour to a side road.

[boutons_deux]

Google has many warnings. Its illogical they would use the "phishing" warning for sites not having https. Makes no sense.

Its like using a Stop sign when you want the driver to detour to a side road.

There are many ways a website can be compromised, chrome's warning list a few, but doesn't mention phishing (which usually attack by email, not by website)


http://i.imgur.com/BmhEtF2.jpg

iow, you're full of naive bullshit

[cheguevara]

The article you posted was strictly referring to http vs https :lol

You are way out if your league. Go back to your Netscape browser :lol

[boutons_deux]

The article you posted was strictly referring to http vs https

Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

[cheguevara]

Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

Using https and having phishing content are mutually exclusive :lol

Go back to searching for knowledge on Alta Vista :lmao

Maybe u can post about it in your Geocities page :lol

[boutons_deux]

Using https and having phishing content are mutually exclusive :lol

Go back to searching for knowledge on Alta Vista :lmao

Maybe u can post about it in your Geocities page :lol

Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

you brought phishing, I didn't and neither does the Chrome warning popup

[cheguevara]

Encouraging websites ALL to use HTTPS exclusively is exactly what Google wants. The browser side irrelevant. Stay in the baby pool.

you brought phishing, I didn't and neither does the Chrome warning popup

I brought up Phishing???

the spurstalk warning IS ALL ABOUT PHISHING

:rolleyes

[Reck]

LOL this has nothing to do with changing to HTTP or whatever. The warning only pops up when browse to here. Doesn't happen to all sites which it would if indeed that was what google was trying to do.

[DMC]

LOL this has nothing to do with changing to HTTP or whatever. The warning only pops up when browse to here. Doesn't happen to all sites which it would if indeed that was what google was trying to do.

I think it recognized that you're probably a faggot.

[Reck]

I think it recognized that you're probably a faggot.

Bend over, I'll show you a faggot.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Bend over, I'll show you a faggot.

Did you think this one through before posting

[cheguevara]

Bend over, I'll show you a faggot.

:lmao

[DMC]

Bend over, I'll show you a faggot.

Your capitulation is duly noted.

[Wild Cobra]

The article you posted says they would mark it with a red cross next to the URL

The message when users hit Spurstalk is completely different it specifically says the site is deceptive. Totally different thing

My guess is our site was blacklisted due to the search results it produces through google. Most likely the NSA has algorithms that automatically blacklist sites. Probably the content of the Political Forum would trigger the NSA blacklist method.

This is all related to NSA and US government shutting down their so called "fake news" sites bullshit

I would not be surprised if the Pizzagate thread itself singlehandely triggered this site. It will be hard for anyone to have spurstalk removed now

I would suggest the reason is so many members here, posting links that are harmful sites.

We have so many unethical members here, its ridiculous.

[Wild Cobra]

If visitor opts to proceed past the warning, Chrome replaces the URL/search bar with a red (warning sign + "Dangerous")

If ST owner would buy/install a cert, the Chrome warning would disappear, proving my points, proving you're wrong.

That so many sites had the danger warning on day Google started its project, you might have point, but you don't.

I suspect what you are claiming would be illegal.

[boutons_deux]

I brought up Phishing???

the spurstalk warning IS ALL ABOUT PHISHING

:rolleyes

... bullshit, the word isn't mentioned in list of problems a compromised website.

[boutons_deux]

I suspect what you are claiming would be illegal.

...because you don't have clue.

All the sites not yet upgraded to HTTPS cause the warning in chrome. How is that illegal? The visitor isn't blocked, just WARNED.

[boutons_deux]

Will your website lose 'secure' status from Google? Here's a quick fix.


Namecheap is stepping up to offer free replacements for SSL certificates—issued by other vendors—that will be nullified by Google Chrome developers.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2017/0330/Will-your-website-lose-secure-status-from-Google-Here-s-a-quick-fix

[Wild Cobra]

...because you don't have clue.

All the sites not yet upgraded to HTTPS cause the warning in chrome. How is that illegal? The visitor isn't blocked, just WARNED.

I'm not using Chrome.