Spurs Trade Market Value Article

[Trueblood]

Interesting read. I agree with two things he said definitively:
1) the Spurs probably won't make a move
2) if they do it'll be a draft pick to get someone in the last roster spot rather than moving one of our current guys

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2689254-san-antonio-spurs-trade-value-rankings-heading-into-2016-17-nba-trade-deadline

[GSH]

"but Anderson could be a rotational piece on numerous NBA rosters as a guy who can run the offense (poorly) and finish the occasional play."


And that's medium value? I guess it really is a shame we didn't keep Ayers, just for trade value.

[Chinook]

That article is bad. Makes a lot of terrible assumptions

[apalisoc_9]

That article is bad. Makes a lot of terrible assumptions

Bleacherfucking report.

I swear, I've read better stuff from posters here and the coli or some other forum. I've got reason to believe most writers are just salesmen. :lol

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

:lol Half of Spurstalk could write a better article on this subject.

[Mr. Body]

Article isn't terrible, really. Not great.

Anderson definitely is neutral at this point. He doesn't hurt the team but doesn't really change the game.

I'm not sure Bertans isn't worth a non-lottery pick. A savvy team would definitely give it, because he looks like he could be even better. Not that the Spurs would do it.

[SAGirl]

"but Anderson could be a rotational piece on numerous NBA rosters as a guy who can run the offense (poorly) and finish the occasional play."


And that's medium value? I guess it really is a shame we didn't keep Ayers, just for trade value.
Bad shtick

[SAGirl]

It's an opinion piece It seems which are highly subjective anyways. Thanks for sharing OP.