View Full Version : NY Subway Terror Plot A Hoax
Nbadan
10-11-2005, 12:14 PM
The informant's on CNN spilling his guts outs...
October 11, 2005 -- The feds now believe that the tip about a supposed terror plot on the city's subways was nothing but a two-bit hoax, law-enforcement sources told The Post yesterday.
An informant — who is believed to be from Pakistan — had told authorities that three men in Iraq were plotting to bomb the subways via remote-controlled devices hidden in baby strollers and briefcases.
One source said the snitch has even admitted to interrogators he made it up. But authorities said they're now satisfied that the three suspects, arrested in Iraq last week, are not al Qaeda members, as the informant...
MURRAY WEISS and ZACH HABERMAN, NY Post (http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/29318.htm)
http://www.insolitology.com/images/Church%20Lady.jpg
Hummm, how convieennieeenttt.
Marcus Bryant
10-11-2005, 01:36 PM
Instead of erring on the side of caution I hope the administration doesn't act on any questionable intel in the future.
boutons
10-11-2005, 01:45 PM
"any questionable intel in the future"
The entire shit in Iraq, starting a fucking war, was based on questionable intel. dubya, wofly et al wanted that war AS A MATTER OF POLICY before the 2000 pres election, no matter what, and didn't give a shit about the intelligence estimates, solid or shaky.
mookie2001
10-11-2005, 01:50 PM
no joke
Marcus Bryant
10-11-2005, 02:13 PM
"any questionable intel in the future"
The entire shit in Iraq, starting a fucking war, was based on questionable intel. dubya, wofly et al wanted that war AS A MATTER OF POLICY before the 2000 pres election, no matter what, and didn't give a shit about the intelligence estimates, solid or shaky.
So you'd prefer to wait until a threat is 100% verifiable or the nation is attacked first before taking action?
Fuck that.
Everyone and their dog thought that Iraq had chemical and biological weaponry and was well along in their nuclear program. That included any number of intel services around the globe.
Fuck your incessant mindnumbing partisan drivel.
JohnnyMarzetti
10-11-2005, 02:22 PM
I stopped going out in the rain since the chances of getting struck by lightning are far greater than being killed by a terrorist attack.
You bunch of scared, bush-whipped pansies.
boutons
10-11-2005, 02:48 PM
"you'd prefer to wait until a threat is 100% verifiable"
You said that, I didn't. Typical fault on your part.
It has become extremely clear that the WH did fuck all to verify any intel, and just started the war as a matter of policy, not for intel reasons.
I don't care what EVERYONE thought about Iraq (what they think is not intel anyway, is it?).
I only care about what was thought by the assholes who actually started the fucking war. And ALL they wanted to do was start the war, no matter whether the intel was verifiable or not.
As a typical ignorant, right-wing dubya-sucker, you make the basic mistake that being against dubya and all he represents is "partisan". ie, that I'm pro some other partisan shit. Big mistake, but so typical. Carry on, I seem to be getting your goat, so you want me to shut up.
This ain't dubya's sycophantic bubble here where posts are only the ones you agree with.
Marcus Bryant
10-11-2005, 02:55 PM
"you'd prefer to wait until a threat is 100% verifiable"
You said that, I didn't. Typical fault on your part.
Review your own criticism in this thread, Dumbass:
The entire shit in Iraq, starting a fucking war, was based on questionable intel.
It has become extremely clear that the WH did fuck all to verify any intel, and just started the war as a matter of policy, not for intel reasons.
It is clear that you cannot express a coherent thought while in a crystal meth induced partisan rage.
I don't care what EVERYONE thought about Iraq (what they think is not intel anyway, is it?).
It was what various intel agencies "thought". RIF.
I only care about what was thought by the assholes who actually started the fucking war. And ALL they wanted to do was start the war, no matter whether the intel was verifiable or not.
All you want to do is paint the current administration in a bad light, no matter what. BFD.
As a typical ignorant, right-wing dubya-sucker, you make the basic mistake that being against dubya and all he represents is "partisan". ie, that I'm pro some other partisan shit. Big mistake, but so typical. Carry on, I seem to be getting your goat, so you want me to shut up.
My, my, someone's testy. I'm neither "right-wing" nor "left wing".
With regards to ignorance you've cornered the market on that, copying and pasting from The New York Times notwithstanding.
Try again.
This ain't dubya's sycophantic bubble here where posts are only the ones you agree with.
Neither is it your trailer park. Now shut the fuck up already.
xrayzebra
10-11-2005, 03:57 PM
"any questionable intel in the future"
The entire shit in Iraq, starting a fucking war, was based on questionable intel. dubya, wofly et al wanted that war AS A MATTER OF POLICY before the 2000 pres election, no matter what, and didn't give a shit about the intelligence estimates, solid or shaky.
Wonder how you would have said the above without all the curse words? Ah, not possible. Another product of our education system.
boutons
10-11-2005, 04:32 PM
MB, you're losing it, and I'm loving it. Go ahead and make my day.
ChumpDumper
10-11-2005, 04:40 PM
Why do people act like cursing is something new here?
Marcus Bryant
10-11-2005, 05:40 PM
MB, you're losing it, and I'm loving it. Go ahead and make my day.
The only thing I've lost is my patience with the chunks of stupidity you've been spewing all all over this forum.
Mr Dio
10-11-2005, 09:32 PM
The only thing I've lost is my patience with the chunks of stupidity you've been spewing all all over this forum.
:lmao
Nothing funnier than a social outcast acting like a :baby
Marcus Bryant
10-11-2005, 09:41 PM
...or you following me around the forum like a lost puppy.
But, I know, you buy tickets and team gear. Congrats. That's impressive.
cecil collins
10-12-2005, 01:04 PM
I stopped going out in the rain since the chances of getting struck by lightning are far greater than being killed by a terrorist attack.
You bunch of scared, bush-whipped pansies.
What he said.
Marcus Bryant isn't partisan because he says he isn't. Fucking liar. Like inpartisanship instantly equals credibility. I don't like democrats, but I fucking hate republicans. So I am not partisan. Marcus Bryant hates Democrats, and always defends republicans. I guess you can say he's not partisan.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.