View Full Version : Kings: About the 2002 WCF
lefty
04-19-2017, 08:12 AM
Yes the officiating in game 6 was horrible, but people keep forgrtting that :
- in the last minutes of game 5, the Lakers were blatantly robbed by the refs
- in game 4 the Kings allowed L.A to make a comeback and that idiot Divac had to tap the ball to the wrong guy :lol
- in game 7, at home, Sacramento missed tons of FT's :lol and Peja airballed an open 3
Yes Sacramento had the better team but the Lakers won fair and square
Mark Celibate
04-19-2017, 08:32 AM
I'm on the "who gives a fuck about this series?" bandwagon as well. Game 6 is extremely overrated in terms of poor officiating. Yeah, there were some questionable calls against the Kings, but I watched the entire game on YouTube years ago when this first came out and I was younger with more free time. I didn't see anything outwardly egregious. You also have to understand that the Kings were one of the all time whiniest teams ever. They were so outwardly demonstrative against any questionable call against them. The series before when they played Dallas, they were whining/crying after every call too and the commentators were calling them out on it. They just looked like mentally weak babies and it showed when they played an experienced LA team.
And of course we have game 7, where only one guy on Sacramento wanted the ball in crunch time. :lol
While Kobe/Shaq were the superstars, guys like Rick Fox, Derek Fisher, and Horry had no problem taking big shots when the first two were double teamed.
lefty
04-19-2017, 08:44 AM
- Bibby was a clutch mofo...his teammates not so much
- Adelman is a good coach, but playing Peja (who was coming back from an injury) in favor of Hedo (who was playing well) was retarded
dfens
04-19-2017, 09:27 AM
imo people really underrate the reason why the 00s lakers were such a great comeback team. People overvalue kobe (clutch in the 4th) over the real value of having an entire frontcourt at the limit of fouling out in the 4th (shaq over an entire game), which obviously makes things much easier for the LA offense.
dfens
04-19-2017, 09:27 AM
- Bibby was a clutch mofo...his teammates not so much
- Adelman is a good coach, but playing Peja (who was coming back from an injury) in favor of Hedo (who was playing well) was retarded
http://images.complex.com/complex/image/upload/c_limit,w_680/fl_lossy,pg_1,q_auto/xxzvbcmrt7eihgrn05cz.jpg
Clipper Nation
04-19-2017, 09:43 AM
If the Lakers had Vince, T-Mac, AI, Kidd, or even Pierce instead of the cancer that year, they win that series in 4 or 5 games easily, tbh. Kobe choked multiple games away with 9-21, 8-24, 11-29 shooting nights.
Kyle Orton
04-19-2017, 10:18 AM
Peja with the 9 years later redemption tbh
lefty
04-19-2017, 11:33 AM
If the Lakers had Vince, T-Mac, AI, Kidd, or even Pierce instead of the cancer that year, they win that series in 4 or 5 games easily, tbh. Kobe choked multiple games away with 9-21, 8-24, 11-29 shooting nights.
In game 4, historically clutch Horry wins the game at buzzer
In the very next game, Choke-Webb leaves Horry wide open, same EXACT SAME SPOT, to help on Kobe but the latter ignores him and prefers ro take the tough contested shot :lol
Getting screwed in one game can happen to any team in any series...and the Kings definitely were screwed in Game 6.
That doesn't explain their other 3 losses. And that's exactly why NBA isn't single-elimination.
Same thing goes for Spurs in 2004 and 2008, tbh.
Clipper Nation
04-19-2017, 11:39 AM
In game 4, historically clutch Horry wins the game at buzzer
In the very next game, Choke-Webb leaves Horry wide open, same EXACT SAME SPOT, to help on Kobe but the latter ignores him and prefers ro take the tough contested shot :lol
Just Kobe being Kobe. A selfish, cancerous choke artist. He was the Queens' MVP that series.
Venti Quattro
04-19-2017, 12:33 PM
The officiating wasn't terrible in Game 6. The Lakers had a 9 FTA advantage if you don't factor in the +6 FTA that they got from the late-game fouling of the Kings (to stop the clock and hope the Lakers miss). Could you imagine the referees only giving LA only a 9 FTA advantage in a game the NBA absolutely planned to rig in favour of LA? David Stern should have fired the officiating crew after Game 6 because they did their jobs very poorly.
Meanwhile, the Lakers got absolutely hosed in Game 5. In that series, the Kings didn't win a game wherein they didn't have a double-digit free throw advantage over LA.
Chris Webber shot around 45% from the free throw line for the entire series. Not just one game. He averaged that in a conference finals. A career 65% shot 45% from the line!!! In a playoff series!!! In game 7, the Kings shot 16-30 from the line.
Shaq shot a little over 60% from the line in that series.
Mark Celibate
04-19-2017, 01:34 PM
Getting screwed in one game can happen to any team in any series...and the Kings definitely were screwed in Game 6.
That doesn't explain their other 3 losses. And that's exactly why NBA isn't single-elimination.
Same thing goes for Spurs in 2004 and 2008, tbh.
That's a good point and I only remember two bad calls against the Kings in the fourth quarter of game 6 (the quarter in which the "rigging" took place). One where they called a phantom foul on either Vlade/Pollard when guarding Shaq and another where Kobe elbowed Bibby in the face off the ball (which was pretty bang bang). That's nowhere close to even justify a rigging IMO, it's only talked about because of Donaghy.
AGain, the Kings were the biggest bunch of babies I've ever seen as an NBA team and they made every call look much worse than it was by overreacting. Back when I watched the tape, I remember some faggot on their team was rolling around on the ground after getting called for a clear foul.
ambchang
04-19-2017, 01:50 PM
The officiating wasn't terrible in Game 6. The Lakers had a 9 FTA advantage if you don't factor in the +6 FTA that they got from the late-game fouling of the Kings (to stop the clock and hope the Lakers miss). Could you imagine the referees only giving LA only a 9 FTA advantage in a game the NBA absolutely planned to rig in favour of LA? David Stern should have fired the officiating crew after Game 6 because they did their jobs very poorly.
Meanwhile, the Lakers got absolutely hosed in Game 5. In that series, the Kings didn't win a game wherein they didn't have a double-digit free throw advantage over LA.
Chris Webber shot around 45% from the free throw line for the entire series. Not just one game. He averaged that in a conference finals. A career 65% shot 45% from the line!!! In a playoff series!!! In game 7, the Kings shot 16-30 from the line.
Shaq shot a little over 60% from the line in that series.
This is a horrible take even for a Laker fan. First off,the Lakers had a +15 FTA advantage over the Kings in Game 6, don't try to rationalize the late game FTA because Kobe got FTs from elbowing Bibby in the face. 2nd, the Lakers had something like 25 FTA in the fourth quarter alone. Third, while the Kings and Lakers shoot about the same amount of FTs throughout the year, the Kings foul a LOT less. In fact, the Kings allowed 4 less FTA per game in the regular season. The Kings simply do not foul that much because they do not want to bog down the pace. That was by design, and the fact that the Lakers shot 40 FTAs in a game, is quite alarming. In 82 games, the Kings allowed 40 or more FTAs exactly ZERO times, and only once in the playoffs (that's the Game 6).
At the same time, the Kings shot 25 or less FTA in the regular season a little less than half the time in the regular season, and only 4 out of the 16 games (25%) in the playoffs. Just going by numbers alone will tell you that that game was an anomaly. In Game 5, the Kings shot 10 more FTA and the Lakers were hosed, and yet in Game 6 the Lakers shot 15FTA and it wasn't terrible? I am not in the camp of looking at FTAs and determining whether a game was called fairly, but at least be consistent in your own argument. BTW, the Lakers have two guys who go to the line consistently, Shaq (who gets intentionally fouled a lot), and Kobe (he drives a lot), everybody else just shoot these wide open shots created by Shaq and rarely gets fouled. Where as the Kings have everyone as an offensive threat and every single player could be fouled many times in a game.
Mark Celibate
04-19-2017, 02:11 PM
This is a horrible take even for a Laker fan. First off,the Lakers had a +15 FTA advantage over the Kings in Game 6, don't try to rationalize the late game FTA because Kobe got FTs from elbowing Bibby in the face. 2nd, the Lakers had something like 25 FTA in the fourth quarter alone. Third, while the Kings and Lakers shoot about the same amount of FTs throughout the year, the Kings foul a LOT less. In fact, the Kings allowed 4 less FTA per game in the regular season. The Kings simply do not foul that much because they do not want to bog down the pace. That was by design, and the fact that the Lakers shot 40 FTAs in a game, is quite alarming. In 82 games, the Kings allowed 40 or more FTAs exactly ZERO times, and only once in the playoffs (that's the Game 6).
At the same time, the Kings shot 25 or less FTA in the regular season a little less than half the time in the regular season, and only 4 out of the 16 games (25%) in the playoffs. Just going by numbers alone will tell you that that game was an anomaly. In Game 5, the Kings shot 10 more FTA and the Lakers were hosed, and yet in Game 6 the Lakers shot 15FTA and it wasn't terrible? I am not in the camp of looking at FTAs and determining whether a game was called fairly, but at least be consistent in your own argument. BTW, the Lakers have two guys who go to the line consistently, Shaq (who gets intentionally fouled a lot), and Kobe (he drives a lot), everybody else just shoot these wide open shots created by Shaq and rarely gets fouled. Where as the Kings have everyone as an offensive threat and every single player could be fouled many times in a game.
Just to play devil's advocate though, isn't that argument slightly flawed considering in the regular season, they're not playing Shaq every night so I think you'd expect that number to go up in a series against the Lakers, right?
ambchang
04-19-2017, 02:33 PM
Just to play devil's advocate though, isn't that argument slightly flawed considering in the regular season, they're not playing Shaq every night so I think you'd expect that number to go up in a series against the Lakers, right?
But given the Lakers and Kings shoot similar number of FTs, and the Kings allow less, logic flows that the Kings should shoot more than the Lakers in a h2h.
Caltex2
04-19-2017, 03:02 PM
Everyone talks about Game 6 and it was a royal screw job but few talk about Game 4. A royal screw job in its own right. There's even a YouTube documentary on it.
LkrFan
04-19-2017, 04:50 PM
If the Lakers had Vince, T-Mac, AI, Kidd, or even Pierce instead of the cancer that year, they win that series in 4 or 5 games easily, tbh. Kobe choked multiple games away with 9-21, 8-24, 11-29 shooting nights.
How did Griffin shoot in the WCFs? :)
Clipper Nation
04-19-2017, 05:33 PM
How did Griffin shoot in the WCFs? :)
Fewer bricks than Kobe :downspin:
Ghazi
04-19-2017, 06:17 PM
2006 Finals were still gay though IMO TBH
daslicer
04-19-2017, 06:28 PM
Everyone talks about Game 6 and it was a royal screw job but few talk about Game 4. A royal screw job in its own right. There's even a YouTube documentary on it.
I'll never forget the refs counting that bs half court 3 by Samaki Walker at the buzzer to end the second quarter. That shot was a huge shot in the arm for the Lakers momentum wise. If instant replay existed back then there is no way that shot counts.
Clipper Nation
04-19-2017, 06:35 PM
2006 Finals were still gay though IMO TBH
Agreed. The Spurs would have won it all that year if they weren't fucked by the ref$ against Dallas.
LkrFan
04-19-2017, 07:01 PM
Fewer bricks than Kobe :downspin:
Yep! ;)
whitemamba
04-19-2017, 11:18 PM
Kings have never been the same since. Daddy, Kobe and Co. drove that franchise into the ground, similar to what dallas did to us tbh.
Caltex2
04-20-2017, 02:27 AM
I'll never forget the refs counting that bs half court 3 by Samaki Walker at the buzzer to end the second quarter. That shot was a huge shot in the arm for the Lakers momentum wise. If instant replay existed back then there is no way that shot counts.
Scott Pollard was fouled out on some BS calls IIRC, holding his hands up. Just one of many things about that game. The NBA clearly wanted a 7-game series.
Chris
04-20-2017, 05:34 AM
Agreed. The Spurs would have won it all that year if they weren't fucked by the ref$ against Dallas.
Yep, couldn't look at Dirk sideways that series without him getting 2 freebies. Manu going full retard didn't help. Then Duncan layed an egg in overtime. That Spurs team was loaded too :wow
ambchang
04-20-2017, 07:12 AM
Kings have never been the same since. Daddy, Kobe and Co. drove that franchise into the ground, similar to what dallas did to us tbh.
So Kobe drove two franchises to the ground. One of them twice.
Kyle Orton
04-20-2017, 11:03 AM
Yep, couldn't look at Dirk sideways that series without him getting 2 freebies. Manu going full retard didn't help. Then Duncan layed an egg in overtime. That Spurs team was loaded too :wow
lmao duncan getting owned by desagna diop
Mark Celibate
04-20-2017, 12:08 PM
lmao duncan getting owned by desagna diop
rofl it's funny how spurfan is trying to tie together the 2002 WCF to the 2006 series against the Mavs. They completely choked in OT against the mighty Devin Harris Stockton and Desagna Diop Chamberlain.
lefty
04-20-2017, 12:16 PM
:lol Nazr
lmao duncan getting owned by desagna diop
:lol
whitemamba
04-20-2017, 05:26 PM
So Kobe drove two franchises to the ground. One of them twice.
Yes.
Kyle Orton
04-20-2017, 06:48 PM
rofl it's funny how spurfan is trying to tie together the 2002 WCF to the 2006 series against the Mavs. They completely choked in OT against the mighty Devin Harris Stockton and Desagna Diop Chamberlain.
lol I forgot about Spur Fans infatuation with Devin Christ Harris after his historic 2 pt effort in game 7
lefty
04-20-2017, 06:52 PM
lol I forgot about Spur Fans infatuation with Devin Christ Harris after his historic 2 pt effort in game 7
Well Porker couldn't guard him
whitemamba
04-20-2017, 07:12 PM
Well Porker couldn't guard him
i know what you did with this thread
Duncan fouling out because Dirk stepped on his foot in the last minute. :lol
Spurtacular
04-21-2017, 02:43 PM
- in game 4 the Kings allowed L.A to make a comeback and that idiot Divac had to tap the ball to the wrong guy
Samaki Walker's half court three counted that he released long after the buzzer. It should've been 3-1 and series over.
Spurtacular
04-21-2017, 03:34 PM
I don't give the Lakers 2002. Even by NBA standards, that was a hatchet job.
lefty
04-21-2017, 04:22 PM
Samaki Walker's half court three counted that he released long after the buzzer. It should've been 3-1 and series over.
True true
daslicer
04-22-2017, 11:23 AM
Scott Pollard was fouled out on some BS calls IIRC, holding his hands up. Just one of many things about that game. The NBA clearly wanted a 7-game series.
Vlade fouling out in game 7 was also bs. Granted he could not stop Shaq but he was the best defender they had to put on Shaq and the only one who could put up some resistance to Shaq on the defensive end. He was also a great play maker. Whenever he was not on the floor the Kings would fall apart when Shaq went on his dominant runs.
lefty
04-22-2017, 03:14 PM
Vlade brought this onto him with all his flopping.
Refs were tired of his shit
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.