NFL Schedule

[Darth_Pelican]

Comes out tonight.

Here's some leaks:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/66i5ta/nfl_2017_schedule_leak_megathread/

[monosylab1k]

The Chiefs? Really?

Pretty sure Goodell knows how riled up Pats fans will be with him in the house, so he wanted to give them an easy win to make sure he gets out of there alive.

[Darth_Pelican]

Tough first game of the year. Saints were considering signing AP so that would be an intriguing storyline since they open up at Minny.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

The Chiefs? Really?

Pretty sure Goodell knows how riled up Pats fans will be with him in the house, so he wanted to give them an easy win to make sure he gets out of there alive.
Why don't they do it last year and open up home against the Falcons since that's on the schedule anyway? That makes the most sense.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Also, nice to see the Cowboys finally getting an easy game on Thanksgiving.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Tough first game of the year. Saints were considering signing AP so that would be an intriguing storyline since they open up at Minny.

I don't see the Vikings being that great. 7-9 is their ceiling. Solid 3rd place in division. They don't have a particularly good QB, their offense in general just stinks, and their defense though top 10 has a lot of names but some of which are getting older, that should take a small step back as well.

If the Saints can put up their customary 28 or 31 points, it'll be an easy road win. The Vikings wouldn't score that many even if you used 11 mannequins on defense.

[Avante]

So who will start out playing three road games in thre first four weeks, while some other team plays three at home, sheesh~~~~ It is important.

[SpursforSix]

So who will start out playing three road games in thre first four weeks, while some other team plays three at home, sheesh~~~~ It is important.

How will we ever figure that one out?

[UNT Eagles 2016]

How will we ever figure that one out?

looks like Cowboys have first 2 at home, so pretty damn good chance it'll be 3 of the first 4.

[Will Hunting]

Why don't they do it last year and open up home against the Falcons since that's on the schedule anyway? That makes the most sense.
That's what I was almost sure would happen, surprised they didn't go with that.

[Avante]

How will we ever figure that one out?


Dude, why act stupid all the time? You got it and ya know it.

[Darth_Pelican]

Romo will be calling the Cowboys-Chiefs game on CBS on November 5th.

[benefactor]

Pretty damn good schedule this year...nice for a year where you are either seeing if Savage is the guy or if they are going to have to roll with whatever QB they decided to develop out of the draft. 11-5 or 10-6 is the floor if they keep the defense healthy.

[SpursforSix]

Dude, why act stupid all the time? You got it and ya know it.

Are you really this fucked up guy? You always post some dumb ass useless comment and then whimper wah wah when someone points it out. You're like some old fuck sitting around talking just to pass the time until you die.

Wonder if it's going to rain?

[Avante]

Are you really this fucked up guy? You always post some dumb ass useless comment and then whimper wah wah when someone points it out. You're like some old fuck sitting around talking just to pass the time until you die.

Wonder if it's going to rain?

I'm not the one lying about being an EXPERT then run when asked to prove it. Dude, faster than a WORLD CLASS 20.00 as a kid??????? Dude. YOU telling anyone anything is fucking comical.

Nothing....useless comment....about wondering what teams get shit on early while others enjoy home cooking. You're just too damn dumb to get that.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Romo will be calling the Cowboys-Chiefs game on CBS on November 5th.

I FUCKING CALLED THIS AHEAD OF TIME!!! HOLY SHIT

(Minus the November 5th part)

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Pretty damn good schedule this year...nice for a year where you are either seeing if Savage is the guy or if they are going to have to roll with whatever QB they decided to develop out of the draft. 11-5 or 10-6 is the floor if they keep the defense healthy.

What???

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2017/04/20/the-houston-texans-have-the-toughest-schedule-of-the-2017-nfl-season/


- The NFC West isn't what it used to be, but you're playing the best team on the road (and one that never loses home games except sometimes to Arizona) and the 2nd best team also on the road. The remaining 2 teams are going to stink and presumably be easy wins, but splitting your interconference is meh at best.

- @ Patriots has always been a sure road loss for the Texans over the years

- The AFC North should be better than last year, maybe not the Browns but they're inevitably going to be improved over last year. The good news for the AFC North is, instead of the NFC East they play the NFC North which is only a shade better than the NFC West for 3rd best division in the NFC (really, there's not much difference, and if the Vikings don't prove better than the Cardinals they could actually be worse). The AFC North also plays the.........

........ AFC South, which will continue to be mediocre at best, with the Colts likely going further backwards and the Jags possibly taking a step forwards (is this the year?!) If the Texans have another 5-1 or 6-0 South year it should be good enough to push them into the playoffs.


In sum, the AFC South has a VERY tough schedule, so whoever wins their division games will ultimately take the cake and make the playoffs as the #4 seed like most years lately, likely at a 9-7 ish record.

[Mark Celibate]

Also, nice to see the Cowboys finally getting an easy game on Thanksgiving.


Son, you must have amnesia and forgotten how awful our pass defense has been. There's no way we give up less than 28 points to the Phillbilly.

The Cowjews actually have a pretty brutal schedule this season. Atleast 5 losses, probably six this year IMO. That's why they should've taken advantage of their great opportunity last season because this year's schedule was going to be rough playing the 1st place schedule plus the AFC West. Gotta capitalize on your opportunities when you get them because after this year, nobody knows what will happen...guys leave in FA, somebody gets injured, Dez/Elliott get arrested, etc

[UNT Eagles 2016]

If the Cousins situation is officially settled down (at least for this year), the NFC East could be mighty dangerous with all the receivers coming into the division. This means, the Cowboys likely won't win 13 games again this year (11 is a more realistic possibility, really anything from 10-12 and 10 might not be good enough to make the playoffs) and the AFC West likely won't look as good this year but that's to be expected.

The AFC West had a cakewalk schedule in 2016, playing the ghastly AFC South and the improving-but-not-quite-ready-yet NFC South which was ultimately a one-team division despite late emergence of the Bucs, who should be improved this year in another very good looking division, more on that in a few paragraphs. But fans of AFC West teams can take their team's losses with a little less alcohol this year than last year, because we're not going to have two 12-4 teams making the playoffs again this year or close. There's just no way.

Along with the great-again NFC East, the AFC West also plays the AFC East which is another one-team division, so that should be a blessing, but the Bills and Dolphins -- though not great -- are 5-to-9 win teams you don't want to overlook especially when you're a far west team traveling out east for noon games, as most of the NFC West learned the hard way last year. Jets should be awful again.

I think Denver takes a step backwards if they're really sold on Siemian as their quarterback. They overpaid for mediocre offensive line parts. Their defense is still top 10 but it was getting a bit raggedy towards the end of last year, and they lost their savvy old leader to retirement. They also lost their stout Super Bowl nose tackle, which doubly stings because they're a 3-4 team. The Peko brothers rotating at NT will leave them more vulnerable against the run than before. Expect them to regress to around 8-8 or 7-9, maybe a shade worse if their schedule proves too difficult they're the team that can certainly be left behind.

Oakland is still king of the division, Lynch or no Lynch, provided they keep Carr upright for a full season. They should win the division with 10-11 wins and get either the 2nd or 3rd seed in the AFC (no way Pats won't get #1). Kansas City will be second, though there is an outside chance they take a bigger step backward than anticipated. They lucked into winning a lot of games last year; their record outperformed their play. Against a team like that, you just have to gameplan to avoid those key mistakes and turnovers against their bend-don't-break style defense that loves to ballhawk. But they could finish anywhere from 8 to 11 wins. Chargers are still swiss cheese on both sides of the ball, most of the flavor coming from their talented but inconsistent pass rush.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Son, you must have amnesia and forgotten how awful our pass defense has been. There's no way we give up less than 28 points to the Phillbilly.

The Cowjews actually have a pretty brutal schedule this season. Atleast 5 losses, probably six this year IMO. That's why they should've taken advantage of their great opportunity last season because this year's schedule was going to be rough playing the 1st place schedule plus the AFC West. Gotta capitalize on your opportunities when you get them because after this year, nobody knows what will happen...guys leave in FA, somebody gets injured, Dez/Elliott get arrested, etc

AFC West had a cakewalk schedule last year and KC in particular had some lucky wins. It seemed like everything went right for the AFC West last year until they all fizzled when it mattered most. Let's not overrate them just because of their records last year given they played a very easy schedule. Oakland should still be outstanding, hopefully for them they can stay healthy and improve their defense, but after that? The offenses just aren't good enough. Denver won't be great if Elway sticks to his guns on Siemian.

"Philbilly" is past his prime and still has a godawful line (Okung never was a great pass protector, might help Gordon but he's been injured a lot and is likely past his prime)... receiving corps is average. They're not going to "hang 28" on us. Think more like 14, 17, 21 range, with one touchdown coming in garbage time after the Cowboys have put it away. Their defense really isn't good, their secondary is bad if you gameplan and know that Hayward will always go for the pick etc. If you stop Bosa's bullrush, you stop him until proven otherwise. They overpaid to keep a solid but not dynamic outside rusher in Ingram. After that their depth gets really thin and they're missing in a lot of other areas too.

Chargers should expect another 5 win season, at best. I called it last year and I'm calling it this year. They won only 5 last year with a cupcake schedule, and that's counting an absurdly lucky win in Atlanta, so 5 would be an improvement this year.

[Mark Celibate]

AFC West had a cakewalk schedule last year and KC in particular had some lucky wins. It seemed like everything went right for the AFC West last year until they all fizzled when it mattered most. Let's not overrate them just because of their records last year given they played a very easy schedule. Oakland should still be outstanding, hopefully for them they can stay healthy and improve their defense, but after that? The offenses just aren't good enough. Denver won't be great if Elway sticks to his guns on Siemian.

"Philbilly" is past his prime and still has a godawful line (Okung never was a great pass protector, might help Gordon but he's been injured a lot and is likely past his prime)... receiving corps is average. They're not going to "hang 28" on us. Think more like 14, 17, 21 range, with one touchdown coming in garbage time after the Cowboys have put it away. Their defense really isn't good, their secondary is bad if you gameplan and know that Hayward will always go for the pick etc. If you stop Bosa's bullrush, you stop him until proven otherwise. They overpaid to keep a solid but not dynamic outside rusher in Ingram. After that their depth gets really thin and they're missing in a lot of other areas too.

Chargers should expect another 5 win season, at best. I called it last year and I'm calling it this year. They won only 5 last year with a cupcake schedule, and that's counting an absurdly lucky win in Atlanta, so 5 would be an improvement this year.

That's a good point about the AFC South actually. They're always the lurking variable when it comes to why one team/division has an unusual amount wins in a season.

Denver will still be tough on the road, obviously Oakland too, KC I expect to win. San Diego is a game I think will be close simply due to the matchups but probably too early to tell. I just can't count them out now since I believe they won in ATL last season.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

As for the NFC South, they were vastly improved last year (particularly over the great debacle of 2014) and should continue to improve steadily in 2017, and should be up there at the top with the NFC East vying for best division in the NFC...

- Their main advantage is, of course, the AFC East which should be as much of a one-team division as ever, instead of playing the unpredictable and generally solid AFC West which won't be the same as last year but should still get two teams in. They also play the NFC North which is likely the second-worst division in an overall superior conference (who will be better -- the Lions or the Rams?) though the NFC East plays the NFC West which is currently a one-team division (but will the Rams with Goff finally emerge or will they win only 7-8 games?). Last year, the NFC South was improved but they got their lunch eaten by the AFC West, generally in a lot of close games, which contributed to the AFC West's inflated records. Will the South get over the hump this year? I think so.

- The NFC South, along with the NFC East are the two divisions in the NFL where you can say right now there isn't any true "bad" team.

- Carolina needs Newton to run less to stay healthy and their OL to be better, but they largely shored up their other gaping hole -- the secondary -- and should be playing better football this year than last. I predict between 7-9 wins.

- New Orleans still has one of the better QBs in the league and arguably the most dangerous vertical attack in the game. Their defense has some legit talent, though it is patchy and had injury issues last year. Breaux, Vaccaro and the stud DTs come to mind. Need a better pass rush and linebacker corps, another CB would help too. I predict between 8-10 wins.

- Tampa is one of the more interesting teams in the league, already vastly improved with maturing talent on both sides of the ball and had an outstanding March in free agency. If healthy, they are now legit at the following positions: WR (they have a lot of good ones), D-Line (Baker, McCoy, and they have emerging stud pass rushers), outside linebacker (they're a 4-3, but this helps in the run game), and corner. Winston is only going to continue to get better. Could be a darkhorse to win the division if Atlanta stumbles a-la Carolina last year. I predict between 9-11 wins.

- Atlanta is obviously coming off a historic heartbreaker. Their schedule will be hardest in the division -- having to go to New England at the start of a 3-game road trip will not be fun, they also have to play Seattle away. They have Cowboys and Packers at home, unfortunately those aren't Seattle, those are teams that can win (or lose) anywhere and the games can go either way. Will it be motivation to get back and finish the fight, like the 2013-14 San Antonio Spurs? Or, will we see a 2012 Texas Rangers/2016 Panthers level post-failure letdown? Either way, we're going to see the true mettle of this team as they bring back nearly the entire band for the 2017 season. This one has the potential to go in a lot of different directions. I predict 7-12 wins.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

That's a good point about the AFC South actually. They're always the lurking variable when it comes to why one team/division has an unusual amount wins in a season.

Denver will still be tough on the road, obviously Oakland too, KC I expect to win. San Diego is a game I think will be close simply due to the matchups but probably too early to tell. I just can't count them out now since I believe they won in ATL last season.
They did win in ATL last year. Very gutsy OT win (though it was more ATL choking than anything, Quinn and Shanahan were horrid in the second half of that one and Quinn lost the game by going for it on 4th & 2 in OT from his own 35)... I watched the game start to finish, remember it vividly though it was quite early in the season when the Falcons hadn't peaked yet.

But they also lost to the Browns, a meaningless game no doubt but that's downright embarrassing.

They're a very flawed team from top to bottom. They pioneered the "let's pay our pocket passing QB a bucket heap, forget the offensive line, not draft well and go from contender to terrible for the next half-decade-plus" schtick that the Colts have seemed to follow to a 'T' to this point.

I like a few of their players but they're just not built to win very many games. Their fans pointed out how they "choked" several games towards the beginning of last year and the record should have been better, well, the Atlanta game and a couple others along with their late season implosion proved that they are what their record was, no better. They simply overachieved to even get their second-half leads in some games they lost early on, before their true colors and lack of defensive consistency or ability to protect Rivers shined brightly on the football world.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Also, quick note, it's not San Diego anymore, it's the L.A. Chargers. So Clipper Nation now supports both the "LAC" teams in sports.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

I expect the Cowboys to go 3-1 against the AFC West, splitting the two on the road and winning both at home. I expect them to split GB/ATL, sweep the shitty NFC West (Seattle is far from shitty, but we're playing them at home and Seattle doesn't usually beat good teams on the road) and go 4-2 in the tough NFC East.

Give or take one game (could win both against GB/ATL and lose another division game, for example) and there's your 12-4 season.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

http://www.buccaneers.com/news/article-1/NFL-Rule-Changes-Approved-for-2017-Season/d5ddf9b9-e4bd-4156-8363-3b3f919c19db


Thank everything that is good... it appears the NFL owners down-voted the most insidious proposition that would have cut regular season OTs to 10 minutes. That was dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb from the beginning, and I hope whoever pulled that shit out of his ass gets their house burnt down. Seriously. Would have ruined the NFL drastically... if anything, if you're going to change the time, extend OT to 20 minutes? Or even better... see below.

Nobody, I repeat NOBODY, wants to see more ties. Ties are miserable and loathsome for all. The players don't, the coaches don't (except Harbaugh, but he's a dumbass) and the fans, above all, REALLY don't want to see that shit. It's like both teams and their fans just suffered a miserable 75-minute loss instead of just one. Literally nobody goes home happy. And worse, it mucks up the standings.

Really I wish they would do away with ties and have a 50-yard kick-off to determine the winner and loser if there's no resolution to the tie after the OT period. The game is football, FOOT ball, after all? Give the kickers a chance. Knock-out style elimination. No blocking or defense on the field, just the long snapper, holder and kicker. Coin toss to see which kicker kicks first (or defers), thus if Kicker A scores the opening field goal, Kicker B must score or else it's game over, then if Kicker B scores Kicker B kicks again and thus becomes the new original kicker of the second round of kicks. This rotates back and forth until either the original kicker or any given round has a miss followed by an enemy score, or the original kicker of any round has a score followed by an enemy miss. The winning kicker's team receives a full win on their record, and the loser's team receives the full loss. No "shootout wins" or any BS of that nature is recorded. It's simply part of the game and will slightly improve the importance of kicking.

Thus, the winner is determined after both kickers have had an equal opportunity to kick a given number of 50-yard attempts.

<A make, B miss> = A wins
<A make, B make, B miss, A make> = A wins
<A miss, B make> = B wins
<A miss, B miss, B miss, A make> = A wins
<A miss, B miss, B make, A miss> = B wins
<A make, B make, B make, A miss> = B wins
<A make, B make, B make, A make, A make, B miss> = A wins. Both kickers have had the chance to kick 3 times.


This would make so much sense, and it would enhance one of the fundamental core tenets of the game which is kicking the ball.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

I've been doing analyses all night and the thing that complicates me most for the spurraider21 (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=31905) Raiders is their "home" game in Mexico City which is against the Patriots and you just know how good they are late in the season, especially in neutral site games. While I don't think NE will go 14-2 again this year they will still be #1 overall and will no doubt show up for a game like that, because to Brady and Belichick they're playing to impress an entire nation, not just one game to them.

10-6 is my official prediction for the Raiders, despite a 9-3 start. That December schedule is VERY rough, I only see them getting 2 wins out of 5 there.

I also have Kansas City at 10-6. Their particular schedule is slightly easier despite coming in 1st because of the particular home/aways and timing. Their December schedule is quite easy, they could make a late run to the playoffs and even win the division if tiebreakers fall in place.

Denver, based on their schedule, looks to have a similar season to 2016. Great start, letdown to follow. I like them to beat Dallas the second game of the season at home even though Zeke Elliott and the OL rush exceptionally well against 3-4 defenses. I see Zeke getting his customary 130-160 yards against a 3-4 team, but the difference will be the Dallas passing game where Denver will have a significant advantage due to it being early in Dak's sophomore season, and let's not forget they still have a top 5 secondary when healthy and obviously Von Miller. I think they make plays on defense, a sack fumble here, a fumble in the secondary there and win a 16-13 type game to go to 2-0.

Beyond that, I see Denver improving to 4-0 (tough win at home against the Raiders) before ultimately falling to New York at home in another slugfest, but this time it will be week 6 and the Giants star receivers will have jelled a bit together. Both teams have great defenses. The game will be a slugfest, low scoring, but ultimately one of OBJ/Marshall/Shepard will make a play to take the cake.

Then, their schedule gets incredibly hard over the next month, I only have them winning the Chargers out of those games. But it's entirely possible they win at home against the Patriots and lose a winnable game, say in Miami early December which would be a crusher. A couple more games they should win in December, but Kansas City poses a matchup problem for them and I predict KC will sweep them again. I have Denver ultimately finishing 8-8 or 9-7 and a second straight third-place finish in the division that mirrors last year.

[spurraider21]

^the fuck did this faggot say? i dont click "view post" anymore due to recurring nausea

[benefactor]

^the fuck did this faggot say? i dont click "view post" anymore due to recurring nausea
I didn't read it...much like I didn't read what he said to me either.

[Avante]

UNT

You are putting way too much into it.....ok? The NFL has been having schedules since 1920, ok? The good teams win and the bad ones lose, just that simple. To get all yakyakyakyakyak....about it, why?

All I ever look at is early season home/road. Just not fair to start off 3 or 4 on the road while others have 3 of 4 at home, but that's just me being silly.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

UNT

You are putting way too much into it.....ok? The NFL has been having schedules since 1920, ok? The good teams win and the bad ones lose, just that simple. To get all yakyakyakyakyak....about it, why?

All I ever look at is early season home/road. Just not fair to start off 3 or 4 on the road while others have 3 of 4 at home, but that's just me being silly.
Logistically it's often impossible for the league to schedule everyone home, away, home, away etc.

The only thing I don't think is fair is the 3+ game roadies, but the players don't seem to mind it.

[Clipper Nation]

Apparently, there are three weeks in the schedule where the Rams and the Spanosfaggots will play home games on the same day at the same time. Gee, I wonder which team's games will have higher attendance and ratings?

The LA Chargers experiment is going to be the biggest flop in NFL history.

[Will Hunting]

Apparently, there are three weeks in the schedule where the Rams and the Spanosfaggots will play home games on the same day at the same time. Gee, I wonder which team's games will have higher attendance and ratings?

The LA Chargers experiment is going to be the biggest flop in NFL history.
How is that going to work, aren't they sharing a stadium? (maybe im mis-remembering)

[Clipper Nation]

How is that going to work, aren't they sharing a stadium? (maybe im mis-remembering)
They're sharing Kroenke's new stadium, but it's not done yet. In the meantime, the Rams are still at the Coliseum and the Faggots are (I shit you not) playing in a 30,000-seat soccer stadium in Carson :lol

[Will Hunting]

They're sharing Kroenke's new stadium, but it's not done yet. In the meantime, the Rams are still at the Coliseum and the Faggots are (I shit you not) playing in a 30,000-seat soccer stadium in Carson :lol
:lmao they're seriously going to play at a povertyball stadium? That's pathetic.

[Clipper Nation]

:lmao they're seriously going to play at a povertyball stadium? That's pathetic.
:lol Yes:

http://www.foxsports.com/west/story/heres-chargers-game-stubhub-center-will-look-like-011717

They've been spinning it as a "unique" and "intimate" experience, but I've heard it's the least "intimate" stadium in the MLS with the worst sightlines.

And in typical Spanos fashion, Dean has jacked up the ticket prices to an insane level and, despite playing at the StubHub Center, he's offically banned fans from using StubHub to buy tickets :lmao

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/chargers-jack-up-season-ticket-prices-for-first-year-at-30000-seat-stubhub-center/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2017/03/03/chargers-to-fans-come-to-stubhub-center-but-dont-you-dare-use-stubhub/

Literally the biggest joke of a franchise in sports. It's going to be hilarious to see them go 0-16 and not be able to fill a tiny povertyball stadium.

[spurraider21]

https://www.101sports.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/stan-kroenke-dean-spanos.jpg

[Mark Celibate]

Apparently, there are three weeks in the schedule where the Rams and the Spanosfaggots will play home games on the same day at the same time. Gee, I wonder which team's games will have higher attendance and ratings?

The LA Chargers experiment is going to be the biggest flop in NFL history.

:lol

How did they screw that one up? How hard is it to schedule a home game when the other team sharing your market is on the road and vice versa? The Jets/Giants do it and baseball has been doing it for awhile.

Also, I'm wondering if using that small stadium is mainly a ploy in order to keep the other team from having a home field advantage like they did at Qualcomm. That might be me just going full tinfoil but ROFL if that's actually true

[IronMexican]

They know they couldn't come close to selling out a stadium like the Rose Bowl, let alone the Coliseum

[UNT Eagles 2016]

They're sharing Kroenke's new stadium, but it's not done yet. In the meantime, the Rams are still at the Coliseum and the Faggots are (I shit you not) playing in a 30,000-seat soccer stadium in Carson :lol
At least you get to go 3-13 for next couple years and draft a new quarterback or something.

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Great looking schedule. I saw three pundits give the Panthers the NFC South back this year, the 4th time in 5 years. Really tough division though, but no doubt we can do it. Injuries plagued us last year.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Great looking schedule. I saw three pundits give the Panthers the NFC South back this year, the 4th time in 5 years. Really tough division though, but no doubt we can do it. Injuries plagued us last year.

Agreed. Tough and criminally underrated. AFC West got all the lucky fluke plays their way in tight interconference games last year. Especially KC. KC is overrated. NFC South is underrated.

I have Carolina finishing 9-7 but still last in that division. Home and away vs. New England will be a huge difference maker, just like home and away vs. Seattle for the NFC East (and AFC South, but they're garbage anyway)

I have Atlanta and TB tied at 11-5 at the top, but ATL winning the tiebreaker because of a 4-2 division record instead of 3-3 (or something like that)...

[Darth_Pelican]

:lmao HarlemHeat37 Clipper Nation

Enjoy listening to a woman call your opening game.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.sportingnews.com/amp/nfl/news/beth-mowins-rex-ryan-monday-night-football-chargers-broncos/qv21vp50o6gt1f1c0kax6kmn1

[UNT Eagles 2016]

:lmao HarlemHeat37 (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=11597) Clipper Nation (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=28500)

Enjoy listening to a woman call your opening game.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.sportingnews.com/amp/nfl/news/beth-mowins-rex-ryan-monday-night-football-chargers-broncos/qv21vp50o6gt1f1c0kax6kmn1

ESPN MNF has been bad commentary wise altogether since Tirico left for NBC (whyyyyy???) The current #1 play by play guy is known for doing college games and that's what he is good at... he is terrible for the NFL, so mundane.

[UNT Eagles 2016]

I guess the good news is CBS #1 games are going to be somewhat watchable for the first time in forever

[spurraider21]

the LA stadium is now a year behind schedule, set to be ready 2020

:lol chargers stuck in a soccer stadium
:lol Clipper Nation
:lol kroenke

[UNT Eagles 2016]

the LA stadium is now a year behind schedule, set to be ready 2020

:lol chargers stuck in a soccer stadium
:lol Clipper Nation (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=28500)
:lol kroenke
Which realistically likely means 2022-2023 range.

[Clipper Nation]

:lol Just think: if Deano had swallowed his pride and agreed to build a new stadium in Mission Valley, it would have been done years ago. Now they're stuck in a tiny povertyball stadium in a city that doesn't want them for years to come. The Spanos family are the biggest idiots in sports ownership today.

[spurraider21]

:lol Just think: if Deano had swallowed his pride and agreed to build a new stadium in Mission Valley, it would have been done years ago. Now they're stuck in a tiny povertyball stadium in a city that doesn't want them for years to come. The Spanos family are the biggest idiots in sports ownership today.:lol your chargers