PDA

View Full Version : Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Revive Travel Ban



ducks
06-01-2017, 11:11 PM
About time USA USA USA

ducks
06-01-2017, 11:15 PM
President Donald Trump’s administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to immediately reinstate his stalled travel ban, aiming to reverse a string of courtroom losses and setting up the biggest legal showdown of his young presidency.
The request puts a Trump initiative before the Supreme Court for the first time and brings the nine justices into a national drama over claims that the president is targeting Muslims and abusing his authority.

DMX7
06-01-2017, 11:16 PM
On 1/27/17, Trump signs 90 day travel ban to give USA time to figure out "what the hell is going on". Ban doesn't survive the courts.

On 6/1/17 (OVER 90 days AFTER the signed travel ban), Trump tries to revive it. How fucking stupid to you have to be to fail to see through that con job?

ducks
06-01-2017, 11:22 PM
Dude they need to protect the USA citizens

lefty
06-01-2017, 11:47 PM
Y tho

Fabbs
06-01-2017, 11:51 PM
About time USA USA USA
It may be well meaning Ducks, but do you really think Don's limited travel ban is going to stop UnIslamic Phucktard from gaining access?

Reck
06-02-2017, 12:04 AM
Inb4 it gets tossed out.

spurraider21
06-02-2017, 12:20 AM
On 1/27/17, Trump signs 90 day travel ban to give USA time to figure out "what the hell is going on". Ban doesn't survive the courts.

On 6/1/17 (OVER 90 days AFTER the signed travel ban), Trump tries to revive it. How fucking stupid to you have to be to fail to see through that con job?
probably just to establish precedent so he can do the same shit periodically

hater
06-02-2017, 07:02 AM
Trump fucked up by commenting against muslims as well as Giuliani actually saying its a muslim ban.

There is no way supreme court would ignore those pieces of evidence. Their ban is dead for good.

They need to move on cause they will keep getting their asses kicked on this

baseline bum
06-02-2017, 07:06 AM
Trump fucked up by commenting against muslims as well as Giuliani actually saying its a muslim ban.

There is no way supreme court would ignore those pieces of evidence. Their ban is dead for good.

They need to move on cause they will keep getting their asses kicked on this

:cry but muh religious freedom :cry

ducks
06-02-2017, 09:39 AM
Trump fucked up by commenting against muslims as well as Giuliani actually saying its a muslim ban.

There is no way supreme court would ignore those pieces of evidence. Their ban is dead for good.

They need to move on cause they will keep getting their asses kicked on this

by law they have to look at the paper not anything else

DMX7
06-02-2017, 09:45 AM
by law they have to look at the paper not anything else

We will see. I think the supreme court, even with its stolen seat, strikes down the ban. Trump doesn't know when to quit. This will be yet another public humiliation.

Furthermore, I hope they bring up my point that the 90 day time frame was always a scam. They've already had 90 days to figure out their plan or whatever BS they were selling.

ducks
06-02-2017, 10:56 AM
It may be well meaning Ducks, but do you really think Don's limited travel ban is going to stop UnIslamic Phucktard from gaining access?

It can not hurt for what it is doing over in eurpope. Nothing guarantees anything but you do have to try to stop it and not bury your head in the sand like the former president did.

Splits
06-02-2017, 10:58 AM
It can not hurt for what it is doing over in eurpope. Nothing guarantees anything but you do have to try to stop it and not bury your head in the sand like the former president did.

What is "it doing over in eurpope"?

clambake
06-02-2017, 10:58 AM
careful ducks. if they start banning people, they'll probably take a close look at you.

ducks
06-02-2017, 11:23 AM
What is "it doing over in eurpope"?

have you not seen the news with the terriost attacks over there?

Splits
06-02-2017, 11:31 AM
have you not seen the news with the terriost attacks over there?

You mean the ones committed by their own citizens? Paris, Brussels, Manchester, Nice? All citizens, not immigrants?

San Bernandino? Orlando?

TSA
06-02-2017, 11:45 AM
You mean the ones committed by their own citizens? Paris, Brussels, Manchester, Nice? All citizens, not immigrants?

San Bernandino? Orlando?

What do all of these citizens have in common?

boutons_deux
06-02-2017, 11:48 AM
What do all of these citizens have in common?

Their co-religionists in foreign countries were invaded, destroyed, occupied by American Imperialists for corporate profits

TSA
06-02-2017, 11:49 AM
Their co-religionists in foreign countries were invaded, destroyed, occupied by American Imperialists for corporate profits

What religion would that be?

clambake
06-02-2017, 11:50 AM
What religion would that be?

don't say it boo.

its a trick

Splits
06-02-2017, 12:14 PM
What do all of these citizens have in common?

They were crazy and/or hated their own government? McVeigh? Koresh? Roof? Stack? Lanza? Holmes?

boutons_deux
06-02-2017, 12:24 PM
don't say it boo.

its a trick

I bitch-slapped TSA and all the other Trash-fellating ignorant rightwing bubbas here, like I always do, but thanks for your advice.

TSA
06-02-2017, 12:43 PM
They were crazy and/or hated their own government? McVeigh? Koresh? Roof? Stack? Lanza? Holmes?

Interesting theory. How does your theory hold up when they blow people up in their homeland?

Splits
06-02-2017, 12:51 PM
Interesting theory. How does your theory hold up when they blow people up in their homeland?

Your question makes no sense. Every incident I mentioned was the crazy/government-hating terrorist blowing up people in their homeland.

TSA
06-02-2017, 01:22 PM
Your question makes no sense. Every incident I mentioned was the crazy/government-hating terrorist blowing up people in their homeland.

Were you not saying Paris, Brussels, Manchester, Nice, San Bernandino, Orlando were citizens who attacked because they hated their own government?

Adam Lambert
06-02-2017, 01:30 PM
sounds like they hated their mosques too but tsa is going to keep ignoring that just like he ignores white gun nuts who commit mass murderer.

is there any doubt this asshole would be fully on board with full scale muslim concentration camps? assuming russia supported it first of course

boutons_deux
06-02-2017, 01:50 PM
sounds like they hated their mosques too but tsa is going to keep ignoring that just like he ignores white gun nuts who commit mass murderer.

is there any doubt this asshole would be fully on board with full scale muslim concentration camps? assuming russia supported it first of course

Pootin has huge problem with Muslims along his southern border. eg, see how Russia destroyed Muslim Chechnya.

ElNono
06-02-2017, 02:09 PM
sounds like they hated their mosques too but tsa is going to keep ignoring that just like he ignores white gun nuts who commit mass murderer.

is there any doubt this asshole would be fully on board with full scale muslim concentration camps? assuming russia supported it first of course

:lol it's all good until the US is asked to pay reparations 30 years from now... then they're welfare queens!

boutons_deux
06-02-2017, 02:25 PM
Which SCOTUS justices will support the ban? I figure 5-4 against the ban, with the usual 4 being reliably for it.

Thread
06-02-2017, 02:36 PM
We will see. [[[I think the supreme court, even with its stolen seat, strikes down the ban. Trump doesn't know when to quit. This will be yet another public humiliation.]]]

Furthermore, I hope they bring up my point that the 90 day time frame was always a scam. They've already had 90 days to figure out their plan or whatever BS they were selling.

BS. If they strike it down he'll take it. You don't win every fight. [They'll] tote up the ciphers & make notes. Trump is making people {vote} on issues and questions. That way EVERYBODY knows where EVERYBODY stands and the electorate can effect at election time. That's his business acumen in action. Like the "Godfather"---"It's not personal, it's business."

Trump President. Not Clinton.

TSA
06-02-2017, 02:42 PM
WH fixed the wording after being struck down. I don't see how it doesn't hold up in the Supreme Court.

spurraider21
06-02-2017, 02:44 PM
WH fixed the wording after being struck down. I don't see how it doesn't hold up in the Supreme Court.yeah, i also thought the 2nd version (while a shitty policy) would hold up, but i guess they're still trying to cling to the intent behind it. the burden on the govt is pretty high when a fundamental right like religion is at play, though. there is a standing issue if they go the religion route, though, since the alleged discrimination would be for people not in the US.

curious to see how the court works through it (assuming SCOTUS decides to take it)

TSA
06-02-2017, 02:49 PM
yeah, i also thought the 2nd version (while a shitty policy) would hold up, but i guess they're still trying to cling to the intent behind it. the burden on the govt is pretty high when a fundamental right like religion is at play, though. there is a standing issue if they go the religion route, though, since the alleged discrimination would be for people not in the US.

curious to see how the court works through it (assuming SCOTUS decides to take it)
It will be interesting indeed

Splits
06-02-2017, 08:18 PM
Were you not saying Paris, Brussels, Manchester, Nice, San Bernandino, Orlando were citizens who attacked because they hated their own government?

Yes, or they were crazy. My theory holds up just fine.

Most people think these terrorists are monsters. But you get the occasional Dale who thinks the likes of McVeigh are heroes, right Thread?

Thread
06-02-2017, 09:30 PM
Yes, or they were crazy. My theory holds up just fine.

Most people think these terrorists are monsters. But you get the occasional Dale who thinks the likes of McVeigh are heroes, right Thread (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=19320)?

Absolutely.

ducks
06-03-2017, 06:58 PM
Trump tweeted give us our rights back

baseline bum
06-03-2017, 07:24 PM
Trump tweeted give us our rights back

LOL thinking this travel ban is about protecting Americans when it doesn't apply to Saudi Arabia.

spurraider21
06-03-2017, 08:00 PM
LOL thinking this travel ban is about protecting Americans when it doesn't apply to Saudi Arabia.
good thing we just made a new deal to sell them a shitload of weapons

i wonder if Chris is following the money yet

Reck
06-03-2017, 08:01 PM
good thing we just made a new deal to sell them a shitload of weapons

i wonder if Chris (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656) is following the money yet

Two scoops, two terms brah.

UNT Eagles 2016
06-03-2017, 08:27 PM
Which SCOTUS justices will support the ban? I figure 5-4 against the ban, with the usual 4 being reliably for it.

6-3 against the ban.

The ban is stupid, not because of the original idea but because of the sorriness of the details.

If Trump wants to be REALLY effective in cutting down on potential terrorist refugees/immigrants, he needs to include other countries in the ban, especially Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the like. Those nations harbor the worst Sunni jihadis because of the endemic nature of all-powerful Sharia law in such nations, particularly Saudi Arabia, which was home to nearly all of the 9/11 perpetrators including Bin Laden himself.

UNT Eagles 2016
06-03-2017, 08:32 PM
LOL thinking this travel ban is about protecting Americans when it doesn't apply to Saudi Arabia.

This, times a million.

Saudistan is the birthplace of Al-Qaeda and is the motherland of a large chunk of ISIS members as well.

Meanwhile, when is the last time an Iranian "terrorist" has ever done a suicide bomb, or shot up a venue in the name of Allah? They don't. The Persians are reasonable, even the more conservative ones, but the vast majority of the millennial generation in Iran is very liberal and open-minded if not agnostic. Unfortunately the laws are still controlled by the old revolutionary generation that hated the Shah as young adults and brought back Islamic law to Iran in the form of Ayatollah reign, but that generation is (fortunately) slowly but surely dying out. On the positive side, these religious nutjobs aren't likely candidates for jihad (the Sunnis, and terrorist masterminds in general always use the young ones as militants), and you don't see much jihad in Shia Islam to begin with.

But why risk damaging our relationship with Saudi-Wahhabi-Salafistan and all the Sunni Islamic nutjobs there when they supply us ****OMG TEH CHEAP OILZ!!!!11!1!!one!!!****

spurraider21
06-03-2017, 08:35 PM
:lmao 100 billion dollar weapons deal with saudi arabia and then acting like we need to take drastic measures to stop islamist soldiers

even saint reagan was perfectly willing to work with iran as long as they were willing to pay for weapons

UNT Eagles 2016
06-03-2017, 08:39 PM
:lmao 100 billion dollar weapons deal with saudi arabia and then acting like we need to take drastic measures to stop islamist soldiers
Why do you think ISIS has $2-3 billion?

1/3 of ISIS and Al-Qaeda militants come out of Saudistan, the homeland of original terrorist cult engineer Muhammad himself.

Think about that next time you put that $50 worth of gas into your SUV at 7-Eleven.


Trump's greatest feat would be to renounce our alliance with Saudi Arabia and designate them pariah status for their open and large-scale support of regional and global jihad. I'd rather trade with Iran at this point, dead serious.

UNT Eagles 2016
06-03-2017, 08:42 PM
I do blame whoever it was who got the original brilliant idea to trade money for oil with Saudi-terrorstan in the first place. Who was that... Jimmy Carter? Lyndon Johnson? Let me find out.

Thread
06-03-2017, 09:10 PM
Why do you think ISIS has $2-3 billion?

1/3 of ISIS and Al-Qaeda militants come out of Saudistan, the homeland of original terrorist cult engineer Muhammad himself.

Think about that next time you put that $50 worth of gas into your SUV at 7-Eleven.


Trump's greatest feat would be to renounce our alliance with Saudi Arabia and designate them pariah status for their open and large-scale support of regional and global jihad. I'd rather trade with Iran at this point, dead serious.


I just want .25 cent a gallon gasoline again. I still recall it at .17 in the late 60's.

baseline bum
06-03-2017, 09:18 PM
I just want .25 cent a gallon gasoline again. I still recall it at .17 in the late 60's.

Weren't you supposed to be in Nam in the late 60s?

Thread
06-03-2017, 09:21 PM
Weren't you supposed to be in Nam in the late 60s?

No, I was in the bush in the early '70's.

Chris
06-03-2017, 09:29 PM
good thing we just made a new deal to sell them a shitload of weapons

i wonder if Chris is following the money yet

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/03/16/saudi-prince-declares-trump-true-friend-muslims-expresses-support-travel-ban/

Saudi Prince Declares Trump a ‘True Friend of Muslims,’ Expresses Support for Travel Ban


Following a successful meeting between Donald Trump and his senior advisor, the Saudi Arabian Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman described Trump as a “true friend of Muslims,” adding that he respects and supports Trump’s travel ban for people from seven terror prone Muslim majority countries.
The Prince’s senior advisor, who attended the White House on his behalf, said in a statement that the meeting was a “huge success” that marked a historic turning point in the bilateral relations [between the] two countries.”

On the subject of Trump’s proposed travel ban, which a federal judge in Hawaii blocked yesterday, the Prince argued that “the measure is a sovereign decision aimed at preventing terrorists from entering the United States of America.”

The statement added that Trump had expressed his “deep respect for the Religion of Islam”:

Prince Mohammed considers his Excellency [Trump] as a true friend of Muslims who will serve the Muslim World in an unimaginable manner, opposite to the negative portrait of his Excellency [Trump] that some have tried to promote whether through publishing unjust statements that are taken out of their context or by means of unrealistic media commentaries and analyses about his Excellency.

In addition to clarifying Trump’s attitudes towards Islam, the pair also discussed Saudi investment in America, with the Prince crediting Trump for improving America’s economic climate.

“Many of the economic files between the two countries have been discussed. They included huge Saudi investments in the United States of America in addition to exceptionally and largely providing American companies with the opportunities to enter the Saudi market. This would not have been achieved without President Trump’s efforts to improve the climate for investments inside the United States of America,” the statement read.

Trump and the Prince’s advisor also discussed the efficacy of border walls, with the Prince outlining the successfulness of building a wall on the Saudi-Iraqi border, adding his only regret was that he did construct a wall on the Yemenis border as well:

Both sides discussed the Saudi successful experience in building a fence on the Saudi-Iraqi border, which led to preventing illegal entrance of individuals, as well as preventing smuggling operations. Prince Mohammed expressed his regrets that Saudi Arabia did not apply this experience earlier on the Saudi-Yemeni border, noting that the success of the northern border experience will accelerate applying it on the Saudi southern border.

In the run-up to last year’s Presidential election, Trump repeatedly criticized Hillary Clinton’s close relations with Saudi Arabia, advising her to return the money her foundation received from Saudi donors.

“So Hillary thinks they are funding ISIS, but still takes their money. And you know their views on gays. And you know their views on women. I think she should give back the $25 to $35 million she’s taken from Saudi Arabia. And she should give it back fast,” he said at the time.

However, Trump equally supported retaining Saudi Arabia as an ally and even suggested the country should develop nuclear weapons to fend off any potential threat from Iran.

https://media.giphy.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/giphy.gif

spurraider21
06-03-2017, 09:34 PM
trump gives saudi arabia 100 billion weapons deal

saudi arabia says nice things about trump and US

:wow bombshell

Quadzilla99
06-04-2017, 06:57 AM
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/03/16/saudi-prince-declares-trump-true-friend-muslims-expresses-support-travel-ban/

Saudi Prince Declares Trump a ‘True Friend of Muslims,’ Expresses Support for Travel Ban



https://media.giphy.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/giphy.gif

They're still not on the list you impossible moron.

boutons_deux
06-04-2017, 07:51 AM
Trump Just Killed His Own Muslim Ban With One Crazy Screwed Up Tweet

The ACLU pounced after Trump screwed up and destroyed his own administration's argument that the Muslim ban is not a ban.


Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

We need to be smart, vigilant and tough. We need the courts to give us back our rights. We need the Travel Ban as an extra level of safety!
6:17 PM - 3 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871143765473406976)

=================

ACLU National (https://twitter.com/ACLU)
(https://twitter.com/ACLU)✔@ACLU (https://twitter.com/ACLU)

Glad we both agree the ban is a ban. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/871143765473406976 … (https://t.co/p1qXkffyIL)
7:22 PM - 3 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/871160314070523905) · Beach Haven, NJ (https://twitter.com/search?q=place%3Ac4a330ce24dfde44)

==================

Here is how badly Trump screwed up.

Last Sunday, his own

Homeland Security Secretary went on national television and argued that there was no travel ban (http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2017/05/28/sec-john-kelly-on-manchester-investigation-keeping-america-safe.html),

“The fact is that in those countries, we have very little ability to actually verify, vet the people that are coming out of those countries.

So, what the president and it’s not a travel ban, remember. It’s the travel pause. :lol

What the president said, for 90 days, we were going to pause in terms of people from those countries coming to the United States that would give me time to look at additional vetting to see –”

Trump has once again been allowed to tweet without adult supervision, and the outcome is that he destroyed his administration’s legal argument with a tweet that will definitely be used against him if the Supreme Court ever hears the full case on the constitutionality of Trump’s executive order.

Because he was allowed to tweet without adult supervision, Trump may have destroyed his Muslim ban.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/06/03/trump-screws-admits-executive-order-muslim-ban.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

ducks
06-04-2017, 10:17 AM
Notice they used vans and knives no one is talking about taking vans away!

Spurminator
06-04-2017, 11:03 AM
Notice they used vans and knives no one is talking about taking vans away!

Good thing they didn't use guns.

Spurminator
06-04-2017, 11:07 AM
It's great that we have a President who reacts to foreign terror attacks the same way everybody's ultraconservative uncle reacts to them on Facebook.

Pelicans78
06-04-2017, 11:23 AM
No, I was in the bush in the early '70's.

Your wife's bush?

AaronY
06-04-2017, 11:44 AM
They're still not on the list you impossible moron.
https://media.giphy.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/giphy.gif

boutons_deux
06-04-2017, 12:16 PM
even saint reagan was perfectly willing to work with iran as long as they were willing to pay for weapons

... as long as they accepted his deal to hold the hostages to prevent Carter getting credit for their release. In return, Pres St Ronnie wouldn't retaliate.

Pelicans78
06-04-2017, 03:14 PM
... as long as they accepted his deal to hold the hostages to prevent Carter getting credit for their release. In return, Pres St Ronnie wouldn't retaliate.

The Iranians hated Carter. They wanted to embarrass him by keeping the hostages until he was out of office. They weren't gonna negotiate with him no matter what. Reagan only negotiated with Iran when it came to hostages kidnapped in Lebanon. Had nothing to do with the hostages in Iran.

ducks
06-05-2017, 05:35 PM
GREGG JARRETT: Justice Ginsburg must disqualify herself in the Trump travel ban case

spurraider21
06-05-2017, 05:40 PM
GREGG JARRETT: Justice Ginsburg must disqualify herself in the Trump travel ban case
oh

monosylab1k
06-05-2017, 09:41 PM
GREGG JARRETT: Justice Ginsburg must disqualify herself in the Trump travel ban case

Well, if Gregg Jarrett says so!











































































Who the fuck is Gregg Jarrett?

boutons_deux
06-05-2017, 10:12 PM
Karl Rove: Trump ‘Took Out a Twitter Gun and Shot Himself Four Times’ on Travel Ban

Fox News’ Karl Rove reacted to President Trump‘s recent tweets about the travel ban by saying tonight, “He took out a Twitter gun and shot himself four times.”

These are the four––from just this morning––he was talking about:


Follow (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1980294624/DJT_Headshot_V2_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!
5:25 AM - 5 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871674214356484096)

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1980294624/DJT_Headshot_V2_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C.

5:29 AM - 5 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871675245043888128)


https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1980294624/DJT_Headshot_V2_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

The Justice Dept. should ask for an expedited hearing of the watered down Travel Ban before the Supreme Court - & seek much tougher version!
5:37 AM - 5 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871677472202477568)



https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1980294624/DJT_Headshot_V2_normal.jpgDonald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

In any event we are EXTREME VETTING people coming into the U.S. in order to help keep our country safe. The courts are slow and political!
5:44 AM - 5 Jun 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/871679061847879682)

Rove said those tweets not only go against the people around him saying it’s not a ban, but Trump was the one who “signed the watered-down version” so he’s essentially criticizing himself.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/karl-rove-trump-took-out-a-twitter-gun-and-shot-himself-four-times-on-travel-ban/

:lol Trash fucked his SCOTUS court case before 6AM :lol

DMX7
06-05-2017, 10:22 PM
People are saying he wants the Travel Ban to go down in the Supreme Court because he wants the Supreme Court to be an enemy of his like the media is. He needs more things to blame for his failures because there are so many of them.

Thread
06-06-2017, 12:09 AM
People are saying he wants the Travel Ban to go down in the Supreme Court because he wants the Supreme Court to be an enemy of his like the media is. He needs more things to blame for his failures because there are so many of them.

Trump President. You got skunked.

boutons_deux
06-06-2017, 07:15 AM
Trump undercuts his lawyers with tweets about travel ban

Legal experts said Trump’s latest comments not only undercut the government’s legal strategy, but cast doubt on the need for the Supreme Court to intervene.

“They said this was a matter of urgency. But if they are already doing the extreme vetting, why do you need an order from the court?” :lol

“I don’t envy the solicitor general,” :lol

The lawyers on the other side, fighting the Trump team in court, were quick to say they were pleased by the president’s comments.

“It’s kinda odd to have the defendant in Hawaii v. Trump acting as our co-counsel,” :lol

Trump had “undercut the picture the government has been trying to paint.”

Lawyers for the government “have made a diligent effort to demonstrate” that the travel order “was not about religious animus,” he said, nor was it an effort to fulfill Trump’s campaign pledge to enact a “Muslim ban.” But Trump’s tweets belie those claims

“It shows that the ban is a ban, and that’s the goal. It is not about developing new vetting procedures,”

“The point cannot be stressed enough that

tweets on legal matters seriously undermine Admin agenda and POTUS--and those who support him, as I do, need to reinforce that pt and not be shy about it.”

“The impulsive, uncontrolled, ill-informed President infects the legal soundness of everything his administration does,”

“Everything else Executive would normally win … will be much, much harder,”

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-court-tweets-20170605-story.html

Fucking Hilarious, all y'all's BFF Trash, the mentally ill asshole supported by ignorant, stupid, mentally ill, delirious, conned, supporters.

Thread
06-06-2017, 08:43 AM
Trump undercuts his lawyers with tweets about travel ban

Legal experts said Trump’s latest comments not only undercut the government’s legal strategy, but cast doubt on the need for the Supreme Court to intervene.

“They said this was a matter of urgency. But if they are already doing the extreme vetting, why do you need an order from the court?” :lol

“I don’t envy the solicitor general,” :lol

The lawyers on the other side, fighting the Trump team in court, were quick to say they were pleased by the president’s comments.

“It’s kinda odd to have the defendant in Hawaii v. Trump acting as our co-counsel,” :lol

Trump had “undercut the picture the government has been trying to paint.”

Lawyers for the government “have made a diligent effort to demonstrate” that the travel order “was not about religious animus,” he said, nor was it an effort to fulfill Trump’s campaign pledge to enact a “Muslim ban.” But Trump’s tweets belie those claims

“It shows that the ban is a ban, and that’s the goal. It is not about developing new vetting procedures,”

“The point cannot be stressed enough that

tweets on legal matters seriously undermine Admin agenda and POTUS--and those who support him, as I do, need to reinforce that pt and not be shy about it.”

“The impulsive, uncontrolled, ill-informed President infects the legal soundness of everything his administration does,”

“Everything else Executive would normally win … will be much, much harder,”

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-court-tweets-20170605-story.html

Fucking Hilarious, all y'all's BFF Trash, the mentally ill asshole supported by ignorant, stupid, mentally ill, delirious, conned, supporters.






Oh, no you don't. They're gonna cast their votes on this deal. That way we know exactly where the bear is shitting in the buckwheat. No free rides here. I want their fucking names on this, especially Gorsuch & that other asshole Roberts.

boutons_deux
06-06-2017, 12:50 PM
Morning Joe passed out quiz, how'd Trash do?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBjla-YXoAA1R6l.jpg:large