PDA

View Full Version : All this talk about the Warriors going 16-0



Uriel
06-09-2017, 07:19 PM
Comes with a huge asterisk.

https://scontent.fmnl3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18582602_10155357771372236_6749814410304193669_n.j pg?oh=17867873b5e2823d95218283f4421b7b&oe=59D66DDA

spurraider21
06-09-2017, 07:33 PM
excellent thread

lol mensa

Hoops Czar
06-09-2017, 07:49 PM
15-1 still would have been impressive.

HarlemHeat37
06-09-2017, 07:50 PM
I've always wondered, where are these asterisks listed, tbh? I heard that about 2007, 2002, 1999, etc..

cjw
06-09-2017, 08:00 PM
It's a title, and nobody should add an asterisk to that.

But the 16-0 is definitely an asterisk. Win by two at home after knocking out the other team's superstar - there is no way in hell they win that game if not for the injury.

And we'll never know how team would have fared - probably lost in 5 or 6 - if Pop had just benched Kawhi after the first tweak. But Warriors are so good he had to do whatever he could to win game 1. And it backfired.

DarrinS
06-09-2017, 08:01 PM
Asterisk = salt

Salty Phil was the first

dabom
06-09-2017, 08:05 PM
I've always wondered, where are these asterisks listed, tbh? I heard that about 2007, 2002, 1999, etc..

Zaza taking out kawhi is up there.

spurs1990
06-09-2017, 08:41 PM
Yeah but 1999 was a ... never mind I don't want to offend what I would assume is still a large number of fans on this board who were around for that.

tbdog
06-09-2017, 10:50 PM
Zaza got away with a punch. Draymond got a T which was changed to Kerr after when i think he got his 2nd. Draymond just axed Thompson in the head after the whistle and they called it a foul before his play. NBA lets them get away with far too much.

$pursDynasty
06-10-2017, 12:55 AM
For all that talk of 16-0 the Dubs are right back at 3-1, & we know how that turned out last time

EIC
06-11-2017, 05:16 AM
For all that talk of 16-0 the Dubs are right back at 3-1, & we know how that turned out last time

If the Cavs take Game 5, many a brick will be shat in Oakland.

Ice009
06-11-2017, 08:17 AM
If the Cavs take Game 5, many a brick will be shat in Oakland.

I really, really want the Cavs to win game 5, just to see how the Warriors react. I don't want either team winning, but I just want to see how the Warriors react if the Cavs win game 5.

bic50
06-11-2017, 09:13 AM
I really, really want the Cavs to win game 5, just to see how the Warriors react. I don't want either team winning, but I just want to see how the Warriors react if the Cavs win game 5.
Flashbacks from last year

koriwhat
06-11-2017, 05:20 PM
Comes with a huge asterisk.

https://scontent.fmnl3-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18582602_10155357771372236_6749814410304193669_n.j pg?oh=17867873b5e2823d95218283f4421b7b&oe=59D66DDA

the only voice of reason around these parts... :tu buddy and hope all is well

cutewizard
06-12-2017, 10:24 AM
Not invincible

cd98
06-12-2017, 11:31 AM
15-1 still would have been impressive.

Yep, it took an NBA record number of threes for Cavs to get that one win.

DPG21920
06-12-2017, 05:24 PM
What is crazy is how much narrative changes with really small moments. I know it's would have, could have, should have, but CLE should have won game 3 as well.

They blew a lead in epic fashion. If this series was 2-2 heading back to GS? Would people still be saying the same things about GS as they are now?

No matter what GS does, it's obvious they are an all-time team. It's just funny how much narrative changes because CLE coughed up game 3 at the end there.