OT: Jackson considering moving Porzingis per Woj

[picnroll]

Question. Is Phil Jackson the dumbest GM with the biggest ego in the NBA?

And btw. Mentally impaired Spurs fans, no they won't trade him for Kyle Anderson.

[Canyonero]

LMA + Kyle + picks imho

[SilverSpur]

Question. Is Phil Jackson the dumbest GM with the biggest ego in the NBA?

And btw. Mentally impaired Spurs fans, no they won't trade him for Kyle Anderson.

But you just said " He is the Dumbest GM in the NBA " so maybe he does take Slo Mo. LOL!:flag:

[daslicer]

Hard to believe Phil would be that dumb to trade Porzingis. Even if Phil is dumb to trade him he's not going to trade him to the spurs in any scenario.

[tonight...you]

Phil isn't the GM. As a matter of fact, the Knicks GM is so low profile, given his high profile position and it being NYC.
Phil's shadow is large and all-consuming...

[SilverSpur]

Porzingis for some tacos, a burrito and Slo Mo.

[Russ]

Question. Is Phil Jackson the dumbest GM with the biggest ego in the NBA?



Phil Jackson is not dumb, he's vindictive.

He wants to destroy the Knicks for their failure to love him.

[TimDunkem]

SAGirl would decline this trade.

[unleashbaynes]

So wait....they finally have a good young player....and they want to trade him?

:lmao Phil

[coachmac87]

Murray+ LMA+ 1st

[look_at_g_shred]

Spurs need to make a call

[Captivus]

I think Jackson just wanted attention, trading Porzingis is CRAZY IMO.

[BG_Spurs_Fan]

:lol Phil will never allow Pop to one-up him. He'd trade him for a 2nd round pick before he deals with the Spurs.

[gambit1990]

spurs should definitely try getting him.

[baseline bum]

Phil Jackson is not dumb, he's vindictive.

He wants to destroy the Knicks for their failure to love him.

Trading Porzingod for Aldridge would definitely accomplish that. :lol

[nyspurguy]

Aldridge, Green, Anderson and 1st for Melo and Porzingis

[AFMadison]

Aldridge, Green, Anderson and 1st for Melo and Porzingis
Rather have Aldridge, green, and KA

[Horse]

Just what we need another big pussy.

[nyspurguy]

Rather have Aldridge, green, and KA

At this point I think Danny should be gone. I know he's a really good perimeter defender but he leaves alot to be desired at that 2 guard position. I say sign and put Simmons at the 2. Murray could get more minutes playing some 2 as well. Pairing Porzingis with Bertans would be awesome. Melo is better than Aldridge. I'd rather have Melo and Porzingis than Aldridge, Green and KA...it's almost a no brainier. Not sure if the Knicks would do it, maybe they could do better.

[TimDunkem]

Prozingod will better than Aldridge next season. Anyone who wouldn't do that deal doesn't know basketball.

Although, if Prozingod landed here, I'd like to move Gasol. He'd be redundant at that point.

[Mr. Body]

I would trade anyone on the team except for Kawhi for Porzingis.

[DAF86]

Aldridge, Tony and Green for Porzingis. Will Jackson be idiotic enough to go for that?

[MultiTroll]

Phil Jackson is not dumb, he's vindictive.
This.
While Phil does not like Pop, Phil also hate Melo.
Get on phone RC immediately and see what NY requires for Porzinger as long as we take Marshmello.

Aldridge + (can we con them into Pau?)

[BatManu20]

Porzingis will likely not be traded, and definitely not to the Spurs. ST :lol

[TheGreatYacht]

Manure, D-League Green, Fathead, Forbes and Hanga for Hernangomez

Phil

[dabom]

SAGirl would decline this trade.


:lol

[BatManu20]

Porzingis will likely not be traded, and definitely not to the Spurs. ST :lol


877219583152795648

[FkLA]

He's kinda overrated imo. More of a #2 at best. He'd blossom in SA and be great as Kawhichael's sidekick though.

[baseline bum]

Aldridge, Tony and Green for Porzingis. Will Jackson be idiotic enough to go for that?

That would be the greatest salary dump in the history of the NBA. But the Knicks would need more than $40 million in capspace to make it happen.

[Mr.Bottomtooth]

877264912803926016

[NASpurs]

877264912803926016

:lol holy shit

[buttsR4rebounding]

877264912803926016

Have no idea what the Spurs have that would interest Knicks, but worth a phone call.

[Ron Swanson]

Chingas Porzingis!

[BatManu20]

Spurs picked up the phone bc they know Phil sucks ass as a GM, but we have nothing of value to offer them. Nobody's going to give up what the Knicks want in return. Porzingis will remain a Knick.

[SilverSpur]

Spurs need to make a call

RC Buford has already made that call, cause he is the best GM in the NBA. Just to see what it would take to get Porzingis.
Due diligence
If Buford could make a trade he would but for now he will tweak the team not sell the farm.

[SilverSpur]

Watch Jerry West get Porzingis for the Clippers.

[GSH]

This article popped up a few minutes ago:

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/knicks-front-office-reportedly-in-full-survivor-mode-right-now/

[tonight...you]

This article popped up a few minutes ago:

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/knicks-front-office-reportedly-in-full-survivor-mode-right-now/
My God, the insanity going on over there... I am... I just...
I'm glad I'm not a Knicks fan.

[tonight...you]

Watch Jerry West get Porzingis for the Clippers.
Lol, for a signed and traded Reddick. If he could pull that off... Damn. He really should be The Logo.

[99 Problems]

Phil maybe holding out for MVPatty as his starting point guard. Imagine this parked outside the Gardens. :convertib

[Phenomanul]

Use the Latvian connection and have Davis Bertans join the call... I wonder if the two are close or not?

[rasuo214]

There were rumors the Knicks would be going after Simmons, so maybe a sign and trade?

[cutewizard]

Do it RC!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Aldridge for Porzingis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[picnroll]

Any Knick fan that goes to hell will be in a better place.

[gospursgojas]

Porzingis is overrated

[picnroll]

Porzingis is overrated

Says you and zero GMs.

[CGD]

Basic framework is there:

LMA for KP/Noah

[BillMc]

Get Davis on the phone to KP.

:lol

[cd98]

But Noah contract. Yuck.

[coachmac87]

Spurs had Knicks assistant coach (Pzorginis favorite) at facility...possibly new hire

[Chillen]

Hard to believe Phil would be that dumb to trade Porzingis. Even if Phil is dumb to trade him he's not going to trade him to the spurs in any scenario.

Any smart GM would know to trade Porzingis it must be to a Western Conference team, so that favors the Spurs. You don't want to make anyone in your conference better. I doubt this happens but it would have to include Aldridge/Green for the Knicks to even listen. Phil is gonna blow it up and do a full rebuild. The Knicks as constructed are going nowhere fast.

[cd98]

Phil wouldn't be dumb enough to trade Porzingas, but he would be prideful enough.

[gospursgojas]

Says you and zero GMs.

Which GMs are offering up max players for him?

[picnroll]

Greatest offseason move Knicks could make is to fire alzheimer ridden Jackson.

[TimDunkem]

Gosoursgojas should stick to evaluating Tex-Mex instead of NBA talent, tbh

[daslicer]

Any smart GM would know to trade Porzingis it must be to a Western Conference team, so that favors the Spurs. You don't want to make anyone in your conference better. I doubt this happens but it would have to include Aldridge/Green for the Knicks to even listen. Phil is gonna blow it up and do a full rebuild. The Knicks as constructed are going nowhere fast.

Phil hates the Spurs. It's hard to imagine any scenario where he ends up doing a deal with them.

[Mr. Body]

Phil hates the Spurs. It's hard to imagine any scenario where he ends up doing a deal with them.

He hates the Warriors even more?

[Mikeanaro]

This is all on Porzingis not Phil, he tried to tame an 11 ring coach all because Fatmelo.

[daslicer]

He hates the Warriors even more?

That's a good question. I don't know why he would hate the Warriors other than Curry who he has said several times is overrated. I guess maybe he hates them because people say they are better than his 90's bulls and '00 Lakers.

[Mr. Body]

That's a good question. I don't know why he would hate the Warriors other than Curry who he has said several times is overrated. I guess maybe he hates them because people say they are better than his 90's bulls and '00 Lakers.

Because they are a weenie team feasting on a league lacking any really good teams and little elite talent?

[daslicer]

Because they are a weenie team feasting on a league lacking any really good teams and little elite talent?

That's how I feel.

[cd98]

In honor of Phil Jackson

http://www.espn.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060224

First-annual Atrocious GM Summit
By Bill Simmons
Page 2

When we were in Houston for All-Star Weekend, one of the marquee events was the annual Technology Summit at the Houstonian, featuring celebrities such as Mark Cuban, David Stern, George Bodenheimer, Magic Johnson, Charles Barkley and Anderson Cooper. Little was made of another gathering: The first-annual Atrocious GM Summit, held Sunday morning at the La Quinta Inn.
http://www.espn.go.com/media/pg2/2006/0224/photo/a_thomas_275.jpg

Noah Graham/Getty Images
One of the better known worst GMs is none other than Isiah Thomas.

Our dream panel included Philadelphia's Billy King; former Raptors GM Rob Babcock; Lakers GM Mitch Kupchak; former Knicks GM Scott Layden; former Cavs GM Jim Paxson; Minnesota's Kevin McHale; former Orlando GM John Weisbrod; and, of course, Isiah Thomas of the New York Knicks. Sadly, Wes Unseld was unable to make it after he accidentally traded his first-class Delta Airlines ticket to Houston for three Southwest Airlines tickets to Atlanta.
(Note: We were going to invite Elgin Baylor, but he was ruled ineligible for the discussion after pulling off the Cassell-Jaric and Radmanovic-Wilcox heists. That's not the Elgin we once knew and loved. Come back to us, Elg.)
Of course, when the NBA asked me to moderate this discussion, I couldn't have been prouder. Here's a transcript of what happened:
Simmons: Guys, first of all, thanks for joining us today, it's an absolute honor to be here.King: Just remember, if you do a good job for the next two hours, I'll give you a $25 million contract for six years!
(Everyone laughs.)
Simmons: Jim Paxson, let's start with you. Last February, you traded a 2007 first-round pick to Boston for Jiri Welsch. Four months later, after you were fired by the Cavs, they traded Welsch to Milwaukee for a 2006 second round pick. To my knowledge, that's never happened before. Walk us through that.
Paxson: Absolutely. When you're making a bad trade, there are some inherent elements that need to be there. First, are you putting your own short-term interests ahead of the long-term interests of the team? With the Welsch trade, there were rumors I might get fired, and we needed another body to make the playoffs … really, why would I care about protecting future No. 1 picks if I was probably getting canned?
McHale: Hear hear! I don't think we have a first-round pick until 2017. And I might trade that one this week.
Paxson: See, Kevin knows what I'm talking about here. The second element: Are you rolling the dice with someone with "potential," who has never contributed to a winning team? Jiri had bounced around the league and couldn't even crack Doc Rivers' regular rotation -- and Doc uses 11 guys a night. So that was in place. Third, and most important, are your fans going to be outraged when they hear about the trade and say things like, "What the hell?" and "How can we stop this guy, he's a menace?" That was there, too. And that's what made the trade so appealing. It's not often you can trade for someone who's worth half as much four months later.
Along those same lines, we aren't just trying to upset our fans, we're trying to confuse them. For instance, three years ago, I gave Kevin Ollie $15 million over five years. Now, he's a below-average guard with no real skills -- if you rated a point guard in eight different categories, he's probably a C-minus or below in each of them. If you're a Cavs fan, how are you supposed to react to that contract? Complete confusion, right? Well, those are goodreactions. At least your fans are discussing the team. If the fans are talking about you, it doesn't matter if it's good or bad, at least they're talking.
Layden: And there's another element here, Jim: You want the fans to feel like they could do a better job than you. When I was in New York, every Knicks fan thought they could do better than me. Every one of them. And they were probably right. Well, you know what that really means? There's a small piece inside of them that says, "If this schmuck can run the Knicks, maybe some day, I can run the Knicks." And once they think that, you have them for life. Those are the people who keep buying tickets and jerseys and hats.
Simmons: Mitch, when you took over the Lakers, you had the best two players in the league and could have won 10 straight titles with the right moves. Instead, you couldn't get it done. Then you traded Shaq for 30 cents on the dollar; you gave cap-killing contracts to run-of-the-mill guys like Chris Mihm and Devean George; you blew all of your draft picks; you wasted the next three to four years of Kobe's prime by drafting a high school center over someone like Danny Granger, who could have helped right away; and then, you outdid yourself by trading Caron Butler and Chucky Atkins' useful expiring contract for Kwame Brown. But the Shaq-Kobe saga overshadowed everything; you haven't gotten enough credit for being a complete debacle. Does that bother you?
http://www.espn.go.com/media/pg2/2006/0224/photo/a_kupchak_275.jpg

AP
"Enough about Isiah, let's talk about me." (GM Mitch Kupchak)

Kupchak: I'd be lying if I said it didn't. When we made the Kwame trade, I was thinking to myself, "This is it, this is the one, now maybe people will start talking about me." Well, it didn't happen. Then the season starts, and Kwame's just a complete stiff … still, nothing. Then Phil [Jackson] goes on the record and calls Kwame a "p----." Nothing. People in Los Angeles just don't care. When you look at what I've done in L.A., it's amazing, really. I traded the best center in the history of basketball 19 months ago, and all we have to show for it is an unhappy Lamar Odom, Kwame and Brian Grant's eight-figure buyout. And yet, nobody mentions me. No offense, Isiah, but you don't realize how lucky you are -- when you screw up, everyone goes crazy. I built a team in which Smush Parker is our third-best player and the 10th-best guy on the Clippers would play 40 minutes a night for us -- yet does anyone ever talk about me? Of course not. It pisses me off.
Thomas: And that's one of the reasons I wanted to work for the Knicks. When I screwed up in Toronto, nobody cared. When I ran the CBA into the ground, nobody cared. When I coached the Pacers and lost a series to Boston in which we had 10 of the best 12 players, nobody cared. In New York, they care. Right now, I'm working on a trade with Orlando where we give up Penny Hardaway's expiring deal and Trevor Ariza for Steve Francis. It's an illogical trade in every respect -- Francis' contract is terrible, there's no way he'll mesh with the other guys, he's never won anything, he gives us the same problems that Marbury gives us, it's a disaster right out of the gate. And that's what makes it so great. When we pull this trade off, New York fans might actually riot. I'm not kidding.
Kupchak: Sure, Isiah, rub it in.
(Everyone laughs.)
Simmons: Isiah, don't you think you're almost too obvious at this point? At least we could see both sides with some of Mitch's moves. In your case …
(Editor's note: Over the next 30 minutes, Simmons proceeded to list all of Isiah's terrible decisions since he took over the team in December 2003, in chronological order, as the crowd voraciously applauded each move, almost like how the president gets applauded over and over again during the State of the Union address. For space reasons, we're skipping to the tail end of Simmons' question.)
Thanks to all of those moves, the Knicks have more untradable contracts than everyone else in the league combined; they won't be under the cap until 2009; they have a payroll that's $50 million higher than anyone else; and they won't have a high lottery pick until 2008 because of the Curry trade. So how can you sell this as a rebuilding effort when you don't have any picks, and how can you sell this as a move to contend when none of the current guys could possibly mesh?
Isiah: That's an excellent question. The key is to make people believe you're trying something that's never been done before. In my case, I always try to acquire the best guy in the trade, regardless of whether it's a good deal or not -- then I can say I'm "stockpiling assets," which throws people off the trail a little bit. Then, I like to float big names to reporters … like right now, I'm making it seem like KG is a possibility for us, and that's why I'm gathering all of these assets. But I don't have a chance in hell of getting KG. If Minnesota trades KG, it's going to be for cap space, picks and young players, and we can't give them two of those three things. So they would never deal with us ---.
McHale: I wouldn't be so sure about that!
Isiah: Really?
McHale: Have you seen some of the moves I have made? Name another GM who cost his team three first-round picks because he wanted to sign someone like Joe Smith to a max contract under the table! Name me another GM who would have willingly traded for Mark Blount, or given huge contracts to Marko Jaric and Troy Hudson, or signed sketchy character guys like Michael Olowokandi and Eddie Griffin! You don't think I would give KG away in a terrible trade? You're crazy! I resent that!
Isiah: I didn't mean to offend you-.
McHale: Well you did!
Simmons: Kevin, let's talk about the Joe Smith debacle. What delighted me wasn't how you lost the picks, but that you were ready to give a max contract to the likes of Joe Smith. Does it hurt your feelings that nobody remembers how dumb this was?
McHale: Of course, of course. At the time, Joe was a guy who gave you 13 points and eight rebounds a game -- solid, but not spectacular. We were willing to pay him twice as much as he was worth, we cheated, we got caught, we lost all those picks … and you never hear this mentioned. If we were a big-market team? Different story.
Babcock: I have to disagree with that -- I think everyone can agree that I made the worst trade of the past 10 years.
Simmons: The Vince Carter trade?
Babcock: Right. I gave him away to the Nets. Gave him away. And I'm known for that now -- it didn't matter that I was working for Toronto. So you can have a negative impact on a small-market team, I think.
http://www.espn.go.com/media/pg2/2006/0224/photo/g_babcock_275.jpg

Ron Turrene/Getty Images
Thoughts on trading? For GM Rob Babcock, one step forward and three steps back.

(The crowd applauds.)
Simmons: Let's talk about that trade, Rob. Walk us through your thought process.
Babcock: When you're trading an unhappy superstar, like Isiah said before, you have to get one of three things back: Cap space, draft picks or young stars. Or else your fans will flip out. Especially if the guy immediately starts playing hard again, which was a mortal lock in Vince's case, because he was clearly tanking it for us. Anyway, my goal was to trade Vince without getting cap space, draft picks or another young star -- that's what would have made it the worst trade of all-time. The problem was that you can't be too obvious with this stuff or the commissioner's office will veto the deal. So what ended up happening was, the Nets gave us two non-lottery picks to save face, but everything else worked out -- not only did we not get a superstar back, we took on three bad contracts, including Alonzo Mourning's deal, which we had to buy out. So instead of getting cap space back, the trade hurt our cap space. I was more proud of that than anything.
Weisbrod: You know, I loved that trade, but I loved the Rafael Araujo pick even more.
Babcock: Thanks!
Weisbrod: Passing up Andre Iguodala for a 24 year-old center who averaged 0.1 blocks per game in college and runs like a duck … I just thought that was brilliant.
Babcock: Well, you hope with these things, but you never sure how they'll work out until they happen.
Simmons: Let's talk about the draft, guys. What are some strategies there? Worst guy available? Taking someone at a position where you already have someone?
King: See, that's where you're wrong. It's always better to make good picks in the draft -- this way, your fans can become attached to them, then you can trade them for inferior guys with bad contracts. Plus, it throws the media off your scent a little bit. I would much rather draft a decent guy, then trade him down the road, or overpay him with a crazy contract that makes no sense or kills my cap space. If you're openly tanking draft picks, it's too obvious.
Thomas: I agree, Billy. If you look at what I've done over the years, I always drafted well: Stoudamire, T-Mac, Camby, Frye, Ariza … you want to stockpile as many assets as possible, only because it gives you more options to do something dumb.
Babcock: I couldn't agree more. That's the single-biggest mistake I made with the Araujo pick. In retrospect, I should have taken Igoudala, kept him for a year, then traded him last summer for Joel Przybilla and immediately given him an $85 million contract extension. Oh, well. You live and you learn.
McHale: I'm kicking myself right now … I wish someone had told me this before I drafted Ndudi Ebi and William Avery!
(Everyone laughs.)
Simmons: So if you don't want to kill your team with bad drafting, what other recourses are there besides trades?
Thomas: Keep changing the roster -- you don't want any semblance of continuity. Once guys get used to playing with one another, they might start winning. Look at the teams that have done well over the last 25 years -- it's always been the teams that built around a nucleus. I even played for one in Detroit. That's why I like to keep mixing things up every six to seven weeks. Why chance it?
King: I'm also a big fan of giving out absurd contracts that tie up your cap space, for three reasons. First, it drives the fans crazy and gets them talking about the team. Second, your fans won't complain that you aren't making any big moves, simply because you can't make any big moves, your lack of cap space prohibits you from getting quality guys unless they have baggage. And third, when people look back and try to put your reign in some sort of historical context, those salary numbers will jump out even more.
Just look at what I've done in Philly: Since we made the 2001 Finals, I gave Mutombo a $68 million extension even though he could have been, like, 48 years old for all we knew. I gave $35.5 million to Aaron McKie. I gave $29 million to Eric Snow. I gave $18 million to Greg Buckner. I gave $40 million to Kenny Thomas and $25 million to Brian Skinner. I gave $25 million to Kyle Korver and $60 million to Sam Dalembert last summer. That's $300 million of contracts to guys who were either on the decline or never that good in the first place. Plus, I traded for other bad contracts, guys like Keith Van Horn, Glenn Robinson, Kevin Ollie, you name it. And then, last February, the pinnacle -- dumping three bad contracts for C-Webb, who everyone thought couldn't be traded because of his contract and because he ran with a limp. Now we have an aging team built around two past-their-prime stars and our cap space is killed through 2008. And we completely wasted Iverson's prime, when he was one of the best players of his generation.
(The crowd applauds.)
King: Thank you. Thank you very much.
Thomas: Billy, if you start getting some heat, there's a way out -- you can sell the situation to your fans by telling them, "Even though these guys are overpaid, they're going to become very valuable in the last year of their contracts as trading chips." Of course, they don't know that the only star players that are ever available are guys like Marbury, Francis, Jalen, Baron Davis, Erick Dampier, Zach Randolph …
(Isiah breaks up laughing.)
Simmons: What about Vince?
Kupchak: That was like the "Perfect Storm," really. You had a very good GM trading with a very bad GM. You had a superstar willing to shame the game of basketball and taint his entire career just to get traded. You had a small market team playing in relative obscurity, in a docile city where the fans really wouldn't revolt beyond a certain degree. I don't think we'll see that again.
Paxson: I agree. In just about every case, if there's an expensive name available on the market, there are strings attached. If there weren't strings attached, why would their team be so anxious to trade them? Fundamentally, it makes no sense. For instance, if I offered you a 2003 Jaguar convertible with 12,000 miles on it for $5,000, then claimed nothing was wrong with the car, would you be a little suspicious? Or would you convince yourself that the car just needed a change of scenery? I don't know why the fans haven't figured this out yet -- name players are usually available for a reason.
Thomas: That's why, as I said before, I like to float out rumors that we're "arming ourselves with assets" to make a run at guys we could never realistically get -- like KG, Kobe or LeBron -- because it gives our fans hope. They think we have a chance at those guys, when the teams that actually have a chance are the Bulls, Clippers, Hornets, Bobcats, Celtics or anyone else with valuable young players and multiple picks. You really think I could get KG this summer for Jalen's contract, Channing Frye, David Lee and a 2012 No. 1 pick? Come on.
McHale: You're doing it again, it's like you're deliberately testing me.
Thomas: Whoops, my bad.
McHale (hushes voice): Wait, Jalen, Frye, Lee and a 2012 pick … would that be an unprotected pick?
Simmons: Guys, guys, wait until after the summit.
Weisbrod: Lemme chime in here … you can always disguise a terrible trade by blaming either the luxury tax or a lack of cap space as your reason, like when the Celtics ended up getting stuck with Vin Baker a few years ago, even though he was practically bringing a flask onto the court with him for the layup lines. But if you have an unhappy superstar, you're better off trying to mend fences with him over dealing him, that's the one thing fans won't forgive.
Simmons: You learned that the hard way with the Tracy McGrady trade, right?
Weisbrod: I sure did. That ended up being your classic three quarters for a dollar trade -- we got Francis, Mobley and Cato for him, or as I liked to call it, "the pu pu platter." For the purposes of destroying a team, it worked fine. But I underestimated how much Orlando fans liked Tracy -- they were just furious with me, I ended up getting death threats and everything.
Layden: Cool!
Weisbrod: Yeah, apparently that was a first for the league.
(Crowd applauds.)
http://www.espn.go.com/media/pg2/2006/0224/photo/a_oneal_195.jpg

AP
Kupchak's most memorable Shaq-Kobe drama and subsequent Shaq trade.

Weisbrod: But I went too far -- you don't want to end up losing your job because of one trade, and that's what happened to me. I have a lot of regrets about the whole thing. I had six or seven more horrible moves in me.
Simmons: What about acquiring guys with personal problems who could potentially screw up your team chemistry? How important is that?

[MultiTroll]

Spurs had Knicks assistant coach (Pzorginis favorite) at facility...possibly new hire
:stirpot:
:lol Hope there is something to it.

[Mr. Body]

I don't see Porzingis happening at all. Jackson's not that stupid. He's looking for high picks and young potential studs but likely isn't even serious about this. But who knows.

I think the Spurs have to deal LMA and Murray and Bertans and, I dunno. I don't think that does it and it all depends on whether Phil thinks Aldridge can return to Portland form and win lots of games anchoring an offense. I doubt it. I mean, I'd make that trade if I were the Spurs, but it ain't happening.

[Mikeanaro]

I don't see Porzingis happening at all. Jackson's not that stupid. He's looking for high picks and young potential studs but likely isn't even serious about this. But who knows.

I think the Spurs have to deal LMA and Murray and Bertans and, I dunno. I don't think that does it and it all depends on whether Phil thinks Aldridge can return to Portland form and win lots of games anchoring an offense. I doubt it. I mean, I'd make that trade if I were the Spurs, but it ain't happening.
Well is not like Porzingis is god or something like that, I think LMA + Murray + Bertans + something else for him is too much too much, even HernanGomez is playing better than him, they cant even make it to the playoffs in the east.

[Mr. Body]

Well is not like Porzingis is god or something like that, I think LMA + Murray + Bertans + something else for him is too much too much, even HernanGomez is playing better than him, they cant even make it to the playoffs in the east.

He's on a tremendously shitty team with two players in Carmello Anthony and Derrick Rose who actively sink their chances at wins. I mean that team is fucking awful. I'd definitely trade those three players for him, but don't think the NYK bite.

[coachmac87]

Well is not like Porzingis is god or something like that, I think LMA + Murray + Bertans + something else for him is too much too much, even HernanGomez is playing better than him, they cant even make it to the playoffs in the east.

Porzingis is Durant on steroids as a 21 yr old prospect...there's a reason he's called "The Unicorn"

[DPG21920]

Porzingis is Durant on steroids as a 21 yr old prospect...there's a reason he's called "The Unicorn"

Say what? KD is much better and alway ways, than Porz

[coachmac87]

Say what? KD is much better and alway ways, than Porz

Porzingis at 21vs KD at 21 is 10x better defender and rebounder...

KD better offensively but in a differnt way and not by much..plus he was the #1 option meanwhile Porzingis isn't..

[Mr. Body]

Durant isn't a good comparison. KD is a supreme offensive talent whose length allows him to be a good rebounder and decent rim defender. Porzingis is what a guy like Andrea Bargnani was supposed to be, inside-outside, potentially nice three-point shooter, rim protector, decent rebounder, tough, high motor. Bargnani was a shitty rebounder and had no motor, but KP is highly competitive.

[DPG21920]

Porzingis at 21vs KD at 21 is 10x better defender and rebounder...

KD better offensively but in a differnt way and not by much..plus he was the #1 option meanwhile Porzingis isn't..

I don't care what you try to say about this, Porz at the same age is not considered a better prospect than KD. Stawp it

[coachmac87]

Durant isn't a good comparison. KD is a supreme offensive talent whose length allows him to be a good rebounder and decent rim defender. Porzingis is what a guy like Andrea Bargnani was supposed to be, inside-outside, potentially nice three-point shooter, rim protector, decent rebounder, tough, high motor. Bargnani was a shitty rebounder and had no motor, but KP is highly competitive.

Porzingis is 7'3 with waaaaay more athleticism then Bargani...People who say he's overrated are retarded...he has terrible teammates/system and structure..get him in the right place and he can take over the league..he's unguardable..there's never been a prospect like him in the history of the NBA...kinda just like Durant..there's never been a 6'11 shooting guard..

[Cklbmk]

trade everything except murray and kawhi and im happy

[sasaint]

Porzingis is 7'3 with waaaaay more athleticism then Bargani...People who say he's overrated are retarded...he has terrible teammates/system and structure..get him in the right place and he can take over the league..he's unguardable..there's never been a prospect like him in the history of the NBA...kinda just like Durant..there's never been a 6'11 shooting guard..

A tad overstated, but if I had an opportunity to acquire either Porzingis or CP3, I go with Porzingis 10 times out of ten. Then maybe we could work another deal for Patrick Beverly or sign George Hill to a less-than-max deal.

[coachmac87]

A tad overstated, but if I had an opportunity to acquire either Porzingis or CP3, I go with Porzingis 10 times out of ten. Then maybe we could work another deal for Patrick Beverly or sign George Hill to a less-than-max deal.

You get both....

[Russ]

If the Spurs get Porzingis they are instant title contenders.

But PJ dislikes the Spurs so I think he would take another option if available.

[sasaint]

You get both....

Ambitious.

[MultiTroll]

If the Spurs get Porzingis they are instant title contenders.

But PJ dislikes the Spurs so I think he would take another option if available.
Appears the only way is to include taking Marshmello in the deal.
Phildo might want to get rid of Anthony that badly.

Something like Softridge and Green.
Phil could save face with that.

[Mr. Body]

Appears the only way is to include taking Marshmello in the deal.
Phildo might want to get rid of Anthony that badly.

Flip Melo over to the Clips in a deal for an S&T'd Paul. Boom.

[MultiTroll]

Flip Melo over to the Clips in a deal for an S&T'd Paul. Boom.
That would be nice. But they have Scam Master West there now.
Already getting bad smells out of LA, like Jersey taking on Mozgovs albatross salary. :rolleyes (Probably being paid for by the Buss trust fund under the table.)

[cutewizard]

Bottomline is...................


Chris Paul PLUS Porzy PLUS KAWHI ========= :lobt2:

[Mikeanaro]

Porzingis is Durant on steroids as a 21 yr old prospect...there's a reason he's called "The Unicorn"
I wouldnt say he is that good, has mad skills but those 3 players Mr.Body proposed are too much for just one guy, Murray is gonna be good, and Bertans is more than Bon Bon ever was.

[OrEmuN]

If Slomo comes out and states that he love to run triangle offense, a swap + fillers may be on the cards.

[BillMc]

With all those picks wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a celtic.