Supreme Court Reinstates Trump Travel Ban; Will Hear Case in Fall

[ducks]

The Supreme Court is letting the Trump administration mostly enforce its 90-day ban on travelers from six mostly Muslim countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.

The action Monday is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his young presidency.
The court did leave one category of foreigners protected, those "with a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States," the court said in an unsigned opinion.
The justices will hear arguments in the case in October.

Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.

The ban would apply to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

The Trump administration said the ban was needed to allow an internal review of the screening procedures for visa applicants from those countries. That review should be complete before Oct. 2, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.

[ducks]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/26/politics/travel-ban-supreme-court/index.html

[ducks]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/supreme-court-to-hear-trump-appeal-travel-ban-block.html

[monosylab1k]

I will be on the Pat McGroin show to discuss the latest on the witch-hunts against Tom Brady, Dan Majerle, and Donald Trump.

TIME: 8 PM eastern, Greenday, July 27.

Please listen live or podcast at:

:ihit

http://ieatcock.com/

[Galileo]

:downspin:

[Thread]

879405223399350272

"Let no heart be faint. Let every arm be steeled. The guidance of Divine God points the way. Follow in His name to the Holy Grail of righteous victory!"

[ducks]

https://twitter.com/RepJeffDuncan/status/879368690822721537/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsmax.com%2FNewsfront%2 Flawmakers-urge-ruth-bader-ginsburg-recuse%2F2017%2F06%2F26%2Fid%2F798283%2FSigned this letter to Justice Ginsburg demanding her recusal from cases involving the Trump Admin due to her previous comments #SCOTUS

[Winehole23]

injunction reversed, Hawaii v. Trump remanded:

http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2018

[Blake]

injunction reversed, Hawaii v. Trump remanded:

http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_26_2018

Oh a 5-4 decision along party lines.

No way didn't see that coming

[spurraider21]

As i expected. Said from the get go that the new version is probably constitutional.

[Reck]

LOL Berniebots.

Every shit decisions that comes on down will just be a reminder of how whiny and pathetic those freeloaders are.

I wanted mah free college and rent :cry

[boutons_deux]

SCOTUS also weaponized 1st Amendment, as predicted, to allow CA Christian Sharia anti-abortion CPCs to LIE to pregnant women.

Lies, and accompanying fraud (CPC staff walking in scrubs and with stethoscopes as if they were licensed, legit clinics, doctors) are protected speech, even when the health of the hearer of the lies is in question.

[spurraider21]

LOL Berniebots.

Every shit decisions that comes on down will just be a reminder of how whiny and pathetic those freeloaders are.

I wanted mah free college and rent :cry
what are you talking about?

[rmt]

LOL Berniebots.

Every shit decisions that comes on down will just be a reminder of how whiny and pathetic those freeloaders are.

I wanted mah free college and rent :cry

Are you in the wrong thread?

[Reck]

what are you talking about?

They didn't vote because Hillary won the nomination or voted for Trump in protest. Gotta eat the shit cake now.

[Thebesteva]

Liberals so sad that they can’t practice sharia law with their fellow Muslims yet.

[spurraider21]

Liberals so sad that they can’t practice sharia law with their fellow Muslims yet.
sup bro? you enjoy popping in out of nowhere and dropping retarded lines?

[boutons_deux]

Sotomayor Blasts Trump’s Anti-Muslim Travel Ban As 'Masquerade of National Security Concerns’ in Fiery Dissent

She said her conservative colleagues turned a blind-eye to the bigoted policy.

Sotomayor said they turned a blind-eye to the policy, which she called “anti-Muslim.”

Writing,

“The United States of America is a Nation built upon the promise of religious liberty,”

she added the “policy first advertised openly and unequivocally as a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

“The policy now masquerades behind a facade of national security concerns,” she wrote.

“This repackaging does little to cleanse Presidential Proclamation No. 9645 of the appearance of discrimination that the president’s words have created,” she added.

=============

Arjun Sethi
(https://twitter.com/arjunsethi81)✔@arjunsethi81
(https://twitter.com/arjunsethi81)
Today is a dark chapter in US history.

The Supreme Court just upheld the #MuslimBan (https://twitter.com/hashtag/MuslimBan?src=hash).

The dissent got this right.

This was never about national security; only anti-Muslim hate.

9:30 AM - Jun 26, 2018 (https://twitter.com/arjunsethi81/status/1011617772407787520)

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/sotomayor-blasts-trumps-anti-muslim-travel-ban-masquerade-national-security

[Thebesteva]

sup bro? you enjoy popping in out of nowhere and dropping retarded lines?

Hows that retarded bro? U remember what muslims did to your ancestors? Kind of similar to what Muslims want to do to Europeans I. UK and Paris. What part is retarded?

[monosylab1k]

Liberals so sad that they can’t practice sharia law with their fellow Muslims yet.

Holy shit, this retard still posts here :lol

[boutons_deux]

Adam Serwer https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f35d.png
(https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer)✔@AdamSerwer
(https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer)
The Supreme Court upholding the travel ban means that

Trump can continue to express his prejudices publicly,

implement those prejudices through public policy, and

then be bailed out by the high court

as long as his advisers manage to provide a superficially neutral pretext.

9:26 AM - Jun 26, 2018 (https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/1011616618936459264)

[Thebesteva]

Holy shit, this retard still posts here :lol

Like I said what part is retarded? The left is the party of feelings. You claimed Muslims to Europe would work and it didn’t. But instead of taking responsibility you have pretend the problem doesn’t exist. This is why you lost and will continue to lose

[spurraider21]

Hows that retarded bro? U remember what muslims did to your ancestors? Kind of similar to what Muslims want to do to Europeans I. UK and Paris. What part is retarded?
allowing people to move here is not the same as endorsing every tenet of their religion including the implementation of sharia law

i think there have been mistakes in europe where they have allowed limited implementation of sharia for parties that consent to have their matters administered there. i think thats a dumb idea. would be opposed to it here.

[boutons_deux]

If Muslims was to submit to Sharia, then as long as no civil laws are broken, why the fuck not?

Jews, Catholics, Mormons, etc submit to their religions' rules.

[Thebesteva]

allowing people to move here is not the same as endorsing every tenet of their religion including the implementation of sharia law

i think there have been mistakes in europe where they have allowed limited implementation of sharia for parties that consent to have their matters administered there. i think thats a dumb idea. would be opposed to it here.

:lolYeah I’m sure the left will oppose sharia law here aka religion of peace

[spurraider21]

:lolYeah I’m sure the left will oppose sharia law here aka religion of peace
the left is the side that always pushes for separation of church and state. so i dont see why that's so funny

again, allowing muslims to move here =/= endorsing the tenets of islam and wanting them part of our government

its a shitty strawman people keep going back to

[baseline bum]

Like I said what part is retarded? The left is the party of feelings. You claimed Muslims to Europe would work and it didn’t. But instead of taking responsibility you have pretend the problem doesn’t exist. This is why you lost and will continue to lose

:rollin

LOL Trumpers are the feelings over facts group

[Thebesteva]

:rollin

LOL Trumpers are the feelings over facts group

:lolYes because their side is the one trying to normalize 58 genders. Also not a Trumper...but left is wrong

https://media.giphy.com/media/6L015gMEW3pFC/giphy.gif

[Chris]

the left is the side that always pushes for separation of church and state. so i dont see why that's so funny

again, allowing muslims to move here =/= endorsing the tenets of islam and wanting them part of our government

its a shitty strawman people keep going back to

Not really. Once the population reaches 16% Muslim it all turns to shit.

[Chris]

:lolYes because their side is the one trying to normalize 58 genders. Also not a Trumper...but left is wrong

https://media.giphy.com/media/6L015gMEW3pFC/giphy.gif

:lol

[spurraider21]

Not really. Once the population reaches 16% Muslim it all turns to shit.
why is that the magic number?

[SnakeBoy]

why is that the magic number?

Well it's only 2 away from 18 and 18 is when it all comes to an end.

[baseline bum]

:lolYes because their side is the one trying to normalize 58 genders. Also not a Trumper...but left is wrong

https://media.giphy.com/media/6L015gMEW3pFC/giphy.gif

LOL not a Trumper. Just like every other poster on the right here who doesn't like him yet constantly semen shields for him. Trump's entire campaign was all about the feels and provoking emotions. It sure wasn't about the facts since that piece of shit lies about everything large and small.

[boutons_deux]

How a 1944 decision on Japanese internment affected the Supreme Court’s travel ban decision

https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/-rP24XG1fTC6AXeyfhIZ48pSM20=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/HJ5UCJGZLMYTNLJ4QZWGHWQWT4.jpg

Fred Korematsu (http://www.korematsuinstitute.org/fred-t-korematsu-lifetime/), a 23-year-old American citizen, was ordered to go to one of those camps in 1942. He refused, pleading his case in the courts until the Supreme Court resolved the issue. In the 1944 case Korematsu v. United States, the court ruled 6-3 in favor of the government, determining that the president’s national security argument allowed the executive order to stand.

That decision was officially rejected by the Supreme Court on Tuesday as part of Trump v. Hawaii, the court’s upholding of President Trump’s ban on migration from certain mostly Muslim countries.

University of Michigan law professor Richard Primus wrote an article exploring (https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/30/donald-trump-korematsu-japanese-internment-supreme-court-215208) precisely the overlap between Korematsu and the travel ban in May 2017.

When he revisited (https://balkin.blogspot.com/2018/04/not-next-korematsu.html) that article in April, he noted that

“the deepest lesson of Korematsu is one that ought to make us unsurprised if the Supreme Court upholds the entry ban orders”

— to wit, that

the court “is perfectly capable of signing off on morally evil executive branch policies

that are ostensibly (but not really) necessary for national security,

even when the legal arguments for the executive branch are weak.”

During the campaign,

Trump himself pointed (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-cites-fdr-policies-defend-muslim-ban/story?id=35648128) to Japanese internment as a precedent for his proposed ban on Muslim migration to the United States.

Lawyers associated with his campaign, Primus said, pointed to Korematsu as a precedent defending the idea

Sotomayor’s dissent, though, argues that there are specific parallels.

“As here, the Government invoked an ill-defined national security threat to justify an exclusionary policy of sweeping proportion. . . .

As here, the exclusion order was rooted in dangerous stereotypes about, inter alia, a particular group’s supposed inability to assimilate and desire to harm the United States. . . .

As here, the Government was unwilling to reveal its own intelligence agencies’ views of the alleged security concerns to the very citizens it purported to protect. . . .

And as here, there was strong evidence that impermissible hostility and animus motivated the Government’s policy.”



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/06/26/how-a-1944-decision-on-japanese-internment-affected-the-supreme-courts-travel-ban-decision/?utm_term=.861ba346d9b7&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1