Keith Olbermann nails Trump on his Texas Trip

[Will Hunting]

Or, they just call you stupid.

:lol are you really triggered over someone saying ducks is stupid?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Goodness gracious, dude. You don't even follow your own bull shit to be giving me this lecture right now. You used an appeal to authority fallacy right after calling out your ad hominem bull shit.

Logic requires strict rigors. You are hardly qualified to be enacting it as an absolute basis for discussion.

A) I thought logic didn't matter here.
B) :lol you don't know what appeal to authority means.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Labeling people racist is a hack move.

Darrin needs a racist safe space.

[Spurtacular]

anyobdy who belittles BLM, coopts it with All Live Matter, and/or Blue Lives Matter, uses SJW as a nasty pejorative, denying that social (and environmental) injustices even exist, is a fucking racist (who's too stupid, ignorant, ball-less to admit it, because his racism is politically correct)

:lmao Dude, you're hack as fuck!

* BLM is racist as fuck!
* All lives do matter (and so do blue lives) if we're gonna go down the feel good road.
* Liberals love to use the word pejorative to sound smart. Just say insult for fuck's sake. And yes, SJW is an insult; and rightfully so.
* How the fuck did environmental shit become part of your definition of racism, you fucking loon?
* Politically correct racism? The fuck!?!? OMG, you're a fucking dipshit!

[Spurtacular]

anyobdy who belittles BLM, coopts it with All Live Matter, and/or Blue Lives Matter, uses SJW as a nasty pejorative, denying that social (and environmental) injustices even exist, is a fucking racist (who's too stupid, ignorant, ball-less to admit it, because his racism is politically correct)
Pavlov

You gonna call him out on this whack shit, or are you a full-on libtard in the us vs. them game?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

Why is that funny? You somehow felt a need to lump blacks with antifa. Care to explain?

[Pavlov]

Pavlov

You gonna call him out on this whack shit, or are you a full-on libtard in the us vs. them game?Dude speaks for himself, no one else.


Why is that funny? You somehow felt a need to lump blacks with antifa. Care to explain?I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

A) I thought logic didn't matter here.
B) :lol you don't know what appeal to authority means.

It's not that logic is of no consequence. It's that deuches like you pretend there's ought to be some strict adherence when it suits you even though you don't follow the rigors of logic in your own right. And ad hominem is about the duechiest card of all to play, tbh.

And I'll remind you that this is a message board and not a classroom. Time and place matters, deuche.

[Spurtacular]

Dude speaks for himself, no one else.


I figured you didn't have the balls to call out one of your own.

[Spurtacular]

I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius.

While making the case that he was racist. How is having an unfavorable view of antifa racist?

[Pavlov]

I figured you didn't have the balls to call out one of your own.He's not one of my own. We are all individuals here. Some less than others.


While making the case that he was racist.I just said he hates black people.
How is having an unfavorable view of antifa racist?I was describing the three topics another person posts about almost exclusively, genius. :lmao

He hates black people and posts about three things almost exclusively. One of those topics is black people whom he hates. Another is Antifa.

Do you understand now?

[Spurtacular]

He's not one of my own. We are all individuals here. Some less than others.



You've definitively chosen sides. You're just taking your pussification to another level by not owning it.

[Pavlov]

You've definitively chosen sides. You're just taking your pussification to another level by not owning it.:lol "the us vs. them game"

Are you serious?

This is childish.

[Spurtacular]

:lol "the us vs. them game"

Are you serious?

This is childish.

My point exactly. Why are you playing it?

[Pavlov]

My point exactly. Why are you playing it?You're menstruating about the fact I'm not playing it.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

It's not that logic is of no consequence. It's that deuches like you pretend there's ought to be some strict adherence when it suits you even though you don't follow the rigors of logic in your own right. And ad hominem is about the duechiest card of all to play, tbh.

And I'll remind you that this is a message board and not a classroom. Time and place matters, deuche.

I'll put your accusation about our use of logic with the same standard of proof you have demonstrated on everything else in this thread. You have avoided discussing Olbermann's argument above all else in this thread.

And I know it's not a classroom. It's been entertaining reading you fumble around on the subject and I have no interest in teaching you. I am content to laugh.

[Spurtacular]

You're menstruating about the fact I'm not playing it.

No, I'm not. If you weren't playing the us vs. them, you'd be calling the twat out. But it was one of your own, so you coyly did some each to his own stuff like a total pussy. :lmao

[Pavlov]

No, I'm not. If you weren't playing the us vs. them, you'd be calling the twat out. But it was one of your own, so you coyly did some each to his own stuff like a total pussy. :lmaoAnyone here can say any stupid shit he wants. boutons does all the time. You probably do more. You menstruate more about it for sure.

[Spurtacular]

I'll put your accusation about our use of logic with the same standard of proof you have demonstrated on everything else in this thread. You have avoided discussing Olbermann's argument above all else in this thread.

And I know it's not a classroom. It's been entertaining reading you fumble around on the subject and I have no interest in teaching you. I am content to laugh.

Avoided; more like disregarded. Olbermann is a total c*nt. I think anyone paying attention gets that.

Bro, I wouldn't take logic lessons from you. You don't even follow the rigors. I'd be cool with it if you were a true academic who was consistent. But little deuche boys who call ad hominem when it suits them and don't even know all the fallacies or care to know them is something else.

[Spurtacular]

Anyone here can say any stupid shit he wants. boutons does all the time. You probably do more. You menstruate more about it for sure.

Yes, he does. But you don't harass the people on your side is the point. You couldn't even be bothered to say an adverse word 'til you got repeatedly called out.

[Pavlov]

Yes, he does. But you don't harass the people on your side is the point. You couldn't even be bothered to say an adverse word 'til you got repeatedly called out.You're still menstruating about it.

:lol @ your trying to impose rules here.

[Spurtacular]

You're still menstruating about it.

:lol @ your trying to impose rules here.

Not imposing anything. Just calling you out for being a poser 'team player.' :lol

[Pavlov]

Not imposing anything.I said "trying" -- you're failing at that too.
Just calling you out for being a poser 'team player.' :lol:lol team

What an infant you are. You're sore because I tell you how stupid the things you say are and you feel like I'm picking on you.

[Spurtacular]

ChumpDumper

Will be honest, bro. I thought you were a more hardcore troll than that.

I wasn't really doing the political forum when you were active under this name; but only trolling certain political classes? Giving passes to dumb asses? I figured you didn't discriminate. But hyper-partisan hacky trolling? That's weak even for a troll, dude. Dayamn!

[Pavlov]

ChumpDumper

Will be honest, bro. I thought you were a more hardcore troll than that.

I wasn't really doing the political forum when you were active under this name; but only trolling certain political classes? Giving passes to dumb asses? I figured you didn't discriminate. But hyper-partisan hacky trolling? That's weak even for a troll, dude. Dayamn!Just ask me to stop picking on you nicely. It might work.

[Spurtacular]

I said "trying" -- you're failing at that too.:lol team

What an infant you are. You're sore because I tell you how stupid the things you say are and you feel like I'm picking on you.

You think splitting hairs changes the meaning, hack boy? Okay, I'm not "trying to impose" anything either.

Bro, I ain't the one playing on a team like you are. It's funny how you do it and then try and deride it. That's weak; real weak.

[Spurtacular]

Just ask me to stop picking on you nicely. It might work.

:lol

I'm the one under your skin, brah.

[Pavlov]

You think splitting hairs changes the meaning, hack boy? Okay, I'm not "trying to impose" anything either. Of course you are.


Bro, I ain't the one playing on a team like you are. It's funny how you do it and then try and deride it. That's weak; real weak.Again, just ask me to stop picking on you. Be a man about being a pussy.

[Pavlov]

:lol

I'm the one under your skin, brah.:lol you're the one saying "brah."

[Spurtacular]

Of course you are.

Again, just ask me to stop picking on you. Be a man about being a pussy.

Late in the game and you're down twenty. Maybe, you should call timeout and huddle with your team, bro.

[Pavlov]

Late in the game and you're down twenty. Maybe, you should call timeout and huddle with your team, bro.:lol game
:lol "bro"
:lol team

[Spurtacular]

:lol game
:lol "bro"
:lol team

Better make it a full timeout.

[Pavlov]

Better make it a full timeout.If you really feel the need to declare victory for whatever you think you're doing here, that's your business.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Avoided; more like disregarded. Olbermann is a total c*nt. I think anyone paying attention gets that.

Bro, I wouldn't take logic lessons from you. You don't even follow the rigors. I'd be cool with it if you were a true academic who was consistent. But little deuche boys who call ad hominem when it suits them and don't even know all the fallacies or care to know them is something else.

So you double down on the ad hominem and demonstrate you have no clue how to do a deduction. Look up mutually exclusive and try again.

As for the second:


I'll put your accusation about our use of logic with the same standard of proof you have demonstrated on everything else in this thread.

I use ad hominems certainly. It describes how I feel about the subject at hand. What I do not do is make that the crux of my argument like you do.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

:lol

I'm the one under your skin, brah.

You're trying too hard. It's not very persuasive when he is writing in an obviously condescending tone. You come across as shrill and desperate.

[Spurtacular]

You're trying too hard. It's not very persuasive when he is writing in an obviously condescending tone. You come across as shrill and desperate.

You come across as unimportant and futile. I'll see you at your next quarterly review.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You come across as unimportant and futile. I'll see you at your next quarterly review.

Your megalomania does not appear as you want it to. it does make you seem mentally ill though.

[Spurtacular]

So you double down on the ad hominem and demonstrate you have no clue how to do a deduction. Look up mutually exclusive and try again.


:lmao "look up mutually exclusive" - Add you come across as a dink to my assessment.

As for what you're babbling about, I refer you to the "futile" part of the assessment. And as for I ain't even going to bother to figure out what you're babbling about, I refer you to the "unimportant" part of the assessment.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

http://i.imgur.com/Ktp1Nyd.gif

Futile at what? What do you think I am trying to accomplish. I am just trying ot make the monkey dance. So far so good.

So dance, monkey, dance.

[Spurtacular]

Your megalomania does not appear as you want it to. it does make you seem mentally ill though.

:lol I bet you had to look that up just to make sure you weren't using the word wrong. You got so swept up in it too; you didn't even bother to consider you were telling a godawful joke.

[Spurtacular]

Futile at what? What do you think I am trying to accomplish. I am just trying ot make the monkey dance. So far so good.

So dance, monkey, dance.

You ain't in my league, bro. You're going full gimp, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

If you really feel the need to declare victory for whatever you think you're doing here, that's your business.

Didn't you already declare victory earlier in the thread? Par for the course, btw. I think we know who the one with needs is. :lol