DNC and Clinton campaign funded "research" on fake Trump dossier per CNN

[Chucho]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html

:lol

Not surprising considering she was so inept and god-awful she couldn't win her dirty, rigged election.

[hater]

Damn

Russiagate Hoax crumbling on top of Shitlery and her democratic goons :wow

Now the democratic puppets, media and democrat retard voters will pay a heavy price

Feel sorry for their souls. There will be hell to pay

[spurraider21]

Washington Post and CNN are fake news guys. In bed with clinton. Clinton news network.

[pgardn]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_dossier-630pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.c0fba7dda1c9

Boots still loves her and just does not get how Trump was elected.

[Pavlov]

You'd think they would've used it.

[pgardn]

Damn

Russiagate Hoax crumbling on top of Shitlery and her democratic goons :wow

Now the democratic puppets, media and democrat retard voters will pay a heavy price

Feel sorry for their souls. There will be hell to pay

Russia attempting to create chaos in our elections is not a hoax. That someone as nutty as Trump could ever efficiently collude with the Russians is and has been extraordinarily doubtful.

Both parties are having huge splits ya ditz. Feel sorry for their souls... Yeah sure...

[pgardn]

Washington Post and CNN are fake news guys. In bed with clinton. Clinton news network.

Oh yes.
And the NYtimes, which according to Hater is an arm of the CIA, opened up the Clinton Foundation.

[AaronY]

They dug up dirt on their opponent pretty much. Everyone does that lol

[Pavlov]

They dug up dirt on their opponent pretty much. Everyone does that lolAdoptions.

[AaronY]

GOP did the same thing for Bernie:

Newsweek Posts GOP Oppo Research On Bernie Sanders

"This article by Newsweek investigative journalist Kurt Eichenwald is full of fury for liberals who sat out the election or voted third party. But in the middle of the piece he drops a few paragraphs on what the GOP had planned for Bernie Sanders had he become the nominee. An excerpt (http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044):
Here are a few tastes of what was in store for Sanders, straight out of the Republican playbook: He thinks rape is A-OK. In 1972, when he was 31, Sanders wrote a fictitious essay in which he described a woman enjoying being raped by three men. Yes, there is an explanation for it – a long, complicated one, just like the one that would make clear why the Clinton emails story was nonsense. And we all know how well that worked out.
Then there’s the fact that Sanders was on unemployment until his mid-30s, and that he stole electricity from a neighbor after failing to pay his bills, and that he co-sponsored a bill to ship Vermont’s nuclear waste to a poor Hispanic community in Texas, where it could be dumped. You can just see the words “environmental racist” on Republican billboards. And if you can’t, I already did. They were in the Republican opposition research book as a proposal on how to frame the nuclear waste issue"

http://www.joemygod.com/2016/11/15/newsweek-posts-gop-oppo-research-on-bernie-sander/

[boutons_deux]

oppo research?

Where's the Beef?

Repugs DEFLECTING from the CONTENTS of the dossier, nearly all of which has been proven TRUE! :lol

Manafort, Kushner, etc said they went to a meeting with Russkies to obtain OPPO DIRT on Hillary! Where's the Repug OUTRAGE? :lol

[Chucho]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_dossier-630pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.c0fba7dda1c9

Boots still loves her and just does not get how Trump was elected.

That's simple. Boots is a fucking moron.

[pgardn]

They dug up dirt on their opponent pretty much. Everyone does that lol

Yeah but people ran with it. You can dig up dirt, but it better be accurate. And then admit it. She distanced herself from the whole thing. She is almost as hardheaded as Trump. She also lies, but not quite as blantantly and laughably.

[Chucho]

They dug up dirt on their opponent pretty much. Everyone does that lol

LOL, really?

[Mitch]

That's simple. Boots is a fucking moron.

He's posting regularly here and at least two more sites around the clock, the dude is the politics version of cosmoron and his decade long moon landing conspiracy shtick :lol

[pgardn]

oppo research?

Where's the Beef?

Repugs DEFLECTING from the CONTENTS of the dossier, nearly all of which has been proven TRUE! :lol

Manafort, Kushner, etc said they went to a meeting with Russkies to obtain OPPO DIRT on Hillary! Where's the Repug OUTRAGE? :lol

We are talking about Trump. And the peeing on whores etc...

[AaronY]

LOL, really?
What are you confused by? Like I don't get your question

[Chucho]

He's posting regularly here and at least two more sites around the clock, the dude is the politics version of cosmoron and his decade long moon landing conspiracy shtick :lol

Oh yeah. Boots is the kind of person who still lives at home and has anger outbursts at his mom and then makes up by serving her a Hungry Man TV dinner and painting her toenails.

[pgardn]

GOP did the same thing for Bernie:

Newsweek Posts GOP Oppo Research On Bernie Sanders

"This article by Newsweek investigative journalist Kurt Eichenwald is full of fury for liberals who sat out the election or voted third party. But in the middle of the piece he drops a few paragraphs on what the GOP had planned for Bernie Sanders had he become the nominee. An excerpt (http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044):
Here are a few tastes of what was in store for Sanders, straight out of the Republican playbook: He thinks rape is A-OK. In 1972, when he was 31, Sanders wrote a fictitious essay in which he described a woman enjoying being raped by three men. Yes, there is an explanation for it – a long, complicated one, just like the one that would make clear why the Clinton emails story was nonsense. And we all know how well that worked out.
Then there’s the fact that Sanders was on unemployment until his mid-30s, and that he stole electricity from a neighbor after failing to pay his bills, and that he co-sponsored a bill to ship Vermont’s nuclear waste to a poor Hispanic community in Texas, where it could be dumped. You can just see the words “environmental racist” on Republican billboards. And if you can’t, I already did. They were in the Republican opposition research book as a proposal on how to frame the nuclear waste issue"

http://www.joemygod.com/2016/11/15/newsweek-posts-gop-oppo-research-on-bernie-sander/



So Trump paid for this? Trump was tied to this?

[Chucho]

What are you confused by? Like I don't get your question

If this were the other way around, you wouldn't be so passive and dismissive of the issue.

I don't think you're a narrow minded, djohn "pick a side" Demo, but there's digging up dirt and there's this.

[AaronY]

So Trump paid for this? Trump was tied to this?
I don't get what you're talking about. Opposition research is as old as politics:

"Origins and historyEdit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opposition_research&action=edit&section=1)In the 1st century B.C., Cicero (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero) is said to have gathered information that was damaging to opponents and using it in attacks against them. He accused one political opponent, Catiline (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catiline), of murdering one wife to make room for another. He attacked Mark Antony (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Antony) in speeches known as the Philippicae (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippicae), eventually prompting Antony to chop off his head and right hand and display them at the Roman Forum.[3] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-3) "


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research

Don't get why you're surprised a politician would try to dig up dirt on their opponent.

[boutons_deux]

We are talking about Trump. And the peeing on whores etc...

no you aren't. YOU are talking BULLSHIT, signor

Trash's pee-whores haven't been proven true, but It Ain't Over Til The Pee Whores Pee.

[Chucho]

I don't get what you're talking about. Opposition research is as old as politics:

"Origins and historyEdit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opposition_research&action=edit&section=1)In the 1st century B.C., Cicero (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero) is said to have gathered information that was damaging to opponents and using it in attacks against them. He accused one political opponent, Catiline (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catiline), of murdering one wife to make room for another. He attacked Mark Antony (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Antony) in speeches known as the Philippicae (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippicae), eventually prompting Antony to chop off his head and right hand and display them at the Roman Forum.[3] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-3) "


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research

Don't get why you're surprised a politician would try to dig up dirt on their opponent.

This isn't just digging up dirt.

[Chucho]

no you aren't. YOU are talking BULLSHIT, signor

Trash's pee-whores haven't been proven true, but It Ain't Over Til The Pee Whores Pee.

Settle down, you loon.

[AaronY]

This isn't just digging up dirt.
What is it?

[Chucho]

What is it?

A concentrated smear effort.

[Chucho]

no you aren't. YOU are talking BULLSHIT, signor

Trash's pee-whores haven't been proven true, but It Ain't Over Til The Pee Whores Pee.

LOL, this dude. "Just wait..." :lmao

[Pavlov]

A concentrated smear effort.Imagine if they had actually used it.

[pgardn]

I don't get what you're talking about. Opposition research is as old as politics:

"Origins and historyEdit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opposition_research&action=edit&section=1)

In the 1st century B.C., Cicero (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicero) is said to have gathered information that was damaging to opponents and using it in attacks against them. He accused one political opponent, Catiline (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catiline), of murdering one wife to make room for another. He attacked Mark Antony (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Antony) in speeches known as the Philippicae (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippicae), eventually prompting Antony to chop off his head and right hand and display them at the Roman Forum.[3] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-3) "


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research

Don't get why you're surprised a politician would try to dig up dirt on their opponent.

I am not surprised.
I am surprised the Clinton Campaign got tied to it and not just some wild bunch at the DNC.

[Chucho]

Denial springs eternal. Whatevs.

[hater]

Washington Post and CNN are fake news guys. In bed with clinton. Clinton news network.

When the roof caves in on this hoax CNN will try to come out clean and turn on Shitler and her goons

They are not going doen with the ship

[Chucho]

Imagine if they had actually used it.

Why'd they fund the "research"? Fair to conjure they wanted to, but we're laughed at by their handlers.

[pgardn]

no you aren't. YOU are talking BULLSHIT, signor

Trash's pee-whores haven't been proven true, but It Ain't Over Til The Pee Whores Pee.

You are going to die waiting, madam.

[Chucho]

This wasn't supposed to happen. Hilary lost because she played the game like a Tammany Hall huckster but alienated the majority too.

[Pavlov]

Why'd they fund the "research"? Fair to conjure they wanted to, but we're laughed at by their handlers.They took over when the Republicans stopped funding it.

To get oppo intel.

Then they didn't use it.

[Chucho]

They took over when the Republicans stopped funding it.

To get oppo intel.

Then they didn't use it.

Why do you think they didn't use it?

[Pavlov]

Why do you think they didn't use it?Don't know how much was corroborated at the time. It wasn't all pee stories. Why do you think they didn't use it?

[DMX7]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html

:lol

Not surprising considering she was so inept and god-awful she couldn't win her dirty, rigged election.

The opposition funded the opposition research? OMG, What a revelation! :lol

[Chucho]

The opposition funded the opposition research? OMG, What a revelation! :lol

LOL, Demo Ducks Denial.

[DMX7]

IT's going to end up being all true... every word of it!

[AaronY]

Dang reading that Wiki article that Karl Rove is a real fucking piece of shit

"A protege of Atwater's, Karl Rove (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove), is considered to be the "architect" of George W. Bush's election to the governor's office in Texas, and to the presidency in 2000 and 2004. In the 2000 race, Rove is credited with masterminding the push poll that initiated the "John McCain (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain) has a black love child" whisper campaign in South Carolina.[30] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-30) Anonymous telephone pollsters, upon determining that a voter was pro-McCain, asked the question, "Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain if you knew he had fathered a black child out of wedlock?" The question was not overt slander, but it prompted the president of Bob Jones University (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Jones_University) to launch his own internet campaign against McCain, and succeeded in crippling the trust of voters McCain had attracted. The Bush camp knew, as the general public did not, that in reality, John McCain is the adoptive father of a dark-skinned Bangladeshi refugee who was rescued by his wife Cindi.[31] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-31) "

[AaronY]

They also did the Swift Boats horseshit

[DMX7]

Dang reading that Wiki article that Karl Rove is a real fucking piece of shit

"A protege of Atwater's, Karl Rove (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove), is considered to be the "architect" of George W. Bush's election to the governor's office in Texas, and to the presidency in 2000 and 2004. In the 2000 race, Rove is credited with masterminding the push poll that initiated the "John McCain (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain) has a black love child" whisper campaign in South Carolina.[30] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-30) Anonymous telephone pollsters, upon determining that a voter was pro-McCain, asked the question, "Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain if you knew he had fathered a black child out of wedlock?" The question was not overt slander, but it prompted the president of Bob Jones University (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Jones_University) to launch his own internet campaign against McCain, and succeeded in crippling the trust of voters McCain had attracted. The Bush camp knew, as the general public did not, that in reality, John McCain is the adoptive father of a dark-skinned Bangladeshi refugee who was rescued by his wife Cindi.[31] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_research#cite_note-31) "

lg34hgcH0Fc

[TSA]

The ants go marching two by two hoorah hoorah

[spurraider21]

who else remembers all those hillary attack ads talking about trump's golden showers?

[AaronY]

lg34hgcH0Fc
Buddy, I love your posts normally but that was long and pointless honestly lol

That old Stuttering John guy from the 80s red carpet Howard stern things are better for that kind of thing:

YhQoXDLDIHM

[SnakeBoy]

When the roof caves in on this hoax CNN will try to come out clean and turn on Shitler and her goons

They are not going doen with the ship

Yep, at some point she is going to get Weinstein'ed

[TSA]

The opposition funded the opposition research? OMG, What a revelation! :lol

It was only paid for and used to obtain a fisa warrant after being previously denied. Nothing to see here folks move along.

[TSA]

who else remembers all those hillary attack ads talking about trump's golden showers?

I remember when you pretended to be an “independent”. Your hardcore leftist wife must give fantastic head.

[spurraider21]

I remember when you pretended to be an “independent”. Your hardcore leftist wife must give fantastic head.
yeah im always pimping blm/antifa and trump impeachment theories. i'm also always defending pelosi/schumer, and saying nonstop good things about hillary the candidate

i still remember when you didnt support trump, but...

[Chris]

21 with the passive aggressive bads per par.

[Pavlov]

It was only paid for and used to obtain a fisa warrant after being previously denied. Nothing to see here folks move along.Did the Democrats use the dossier before the election?

Yes or no.

[hater]

I remember when CNN tried to pimp the dossier through daily "leaks"

They did use it at some point

[Spurtacular]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html

:lol

Not surprising considering she was so inept and god-awful she couldn't win her dirty, rigged election.

This was news months ago, tbh. CNN just now getting to it, though...

[pgardn]

Did the Democrats use the dossier before the election?

Yes or no.

No.

But it still does not free Clinton from questions about how extensive her working knowlege of this little part of her campaign was. And it all may be perfectly legal and common. The Republicans have clearly pulled off some of the worst crap concerning this type of behavior. But it is also clear that once the Democrats fully figured out how to make big money for campaigns under Obama's incredible fund raising capabilities they fell right into bed with some bad partners and habits. The democrats had a leg up of being considered the party of people who had little to zero say in the running of our country. This badge is stained. It's pretty clear given the last election.

So articles like the WPost put up are important for reform, if you are a Democrat anyways IMO. The Republicans as a whole are not pleased with Trump at all. They have pulled off rounding up a little over 1/3 of the vote to simply run on vengeance against 8 years of Obama. It does not matter if policy helps or hurts the country as a whole or not to these people. They see Democrats pulling the same thing; the blind following of minorities and disadvantaged (while actually getting very little done)

Look at this board as a microcosm. It runs off of thwarting the other party and vengeance, Not good policy for the whole. The Republicans were willing to put forward some of the worst health care shit ever seen just to take down Obamacare. Even though they and almost everyone else knows it needs much reform. They were willing to replace a model with much worse just to say, mission accomplished, we have screwed the country while keeping our word. That's Fd up...

[djohn2oo8]

Damn

Russiagate Hoax crumbling on top of Shitlery and her democratic goons :wow

Now the democratic puppets, media and democrat retard voters will pay a heavy price

Feel sorry for their souls. There will be hell to pay

So now you choose to believe the WaPo :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

923161348846047232
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

923162867729301505
Dossier served as a roadmap. and is mostly verified. This will drag in Democrats too. But hater and his tardgang think it's all a hoax.

[djohn2oo8]

923164547309035520
:lol

[djohn2oo8]

923023878884151296
923024066939932672
923024229418917888
923024639626043393
:lmao

[Quadzilla99]

The ants go marching two by two hoorah hoorah

Well they're not that stupid. I mean it's not like they fell for something totally moronic like pizzagate after all

[AaronY]

A concentrated smear effort.

If they made up the pee tape then yeah. If it's a rumor and they investigated it then I don't see what the big deal is.

Swift Boat stuff in 2004 was same kind of deal except it's pretty clear RNC knew it was bullshit at the time and they ran ads with it anyway

[boutons_deux]

No.

But it still does not free Clinton from questions about how extensive her working knowlege of this little part of her campaign was. And it all may be perfectly legal and common. The Republicans have clearly pulled off some of the worst crap concerning this type of behavior. But it is also clear that once the Democrats fully figured out how to make big money for campaigns under Obama's incredible fund raising capabilities they fell right into bed with some bad partners and habits. The democrats had a leg up of being considered the party of people who had little to zero say in the running of our country. This badge is stained. It's pretty clear given the last election.

So articles like the WPost put up are important for reform, if you are a Democrat anyways IMO. The Republicans as a whole are not pleased with Trump at all. They have pulled off rounding up a little over 1/3 of the vote to simply run on vengeance against 8 years of Obama. It does not matter if policy helps or hurts the country as a whole or not to these people. They see Democrats pulling the same thing; the blind following of minorities and disadvantaged (while actually getting very little done)

Look at this board as a microcosm. It runs off of thwarting the other party and vengeance, Not good policy for the whole. The Republicans were willing to put forward some of the worst health care shit ever seen just to take down Obamacare. Even though they and almost everyone else knows it needs much reform. They were willing to replace a model with much worse just to say, mission accomplished, we have screwed the country while keeping our word. That's Fd up...

You're takes are FUCKED UP, as always.

It doesn't matter at all how much Hillary knew about Steele's OPPO research. Oppo ain't illegal, and won't be "reformed". There's no need for her to be "freed up".

Citizens have NO SAY in how the country is run, so "we" have not screwed the country, the oligarchy has, That's the exclusive province of the oligarchy that effectively makes or kills all the laws, rules, regulations that affect its power and wealth, owns all politicians, all levels, and much of the elected-for-profit judiciary.

[Chucho]

You're takes are FUCKED UP, as always.

It doesn't matter at all how much Hillary knew about Steele's OPPO research. Oppo ain't illegal, and won't be "reformed". There's no need for her to be "freed up".

Citizens have NO SAY in how the country is run, so "we" have not screwed the country, the oligarchy has, That's the exclusive province of the oligarchy that effectively makes or kills all the laws, rules, regulations that affect its power and wealth, owns all politicians, all levels, and much of the elected-for-profit judiciary.





LOL, you're an idiot. To you, ONLY the Right is "the Oligarchy".

[Quadzilla99]

LOL, you're an idiot. To you, ONLY the Right is "the Oligarchy".

Whoop :depressed

922976405780140032

[Chucho]

And LOL at dJohn doing his version of Chris with Dem cheerleader tweet posts.

[Chucho]

Whoop :depressed

922976405780140032


OK, what does that have to do with a batshit loon who thinks there's a giant, "greater power" running the world and it's ONLY on the Conservative side? :lol

[spurraider21]

OK, what does that have to do with a batshit loon who thinks there's a giant, "greater power" running the world and it's ONLY on the Conservative side? :lol
Boots is batshit. We already know that. He's the same thing as Chris. :lol liberals run by Luciferians

[monosylab1k]

Well they're not that stupid. I mean it's not like they fell for something totally moronic like pizzagate after all

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Conservatives Cry Collusion :lol Over News Dems Helped Fund Dossier Research


https://dawm7kda6y2v0.cloudfront.net/uploads/2016/07/[email protected]
Ingraham (https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle)
(https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle)✔@IngrahamAngle (https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle)

Collusion. Dossier of Russian-generated dirt on @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)was paid for by @HillaryClinton (https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton) & funneled thru Comey. Priceless.
6:12 PM - Oct 24, 2017 (https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle/status/922964153660256257)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/conservatives-cry-collusion-clinton-campaign-dnc-trump-dossier?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29

Russian generated? as in fake news? :lol

No, all Steele dossier effectively VERIFIED, meaning it's Russian DISCOVERED! :lol

[Spurminator]

At this point we're just going to lose our minds over any headline that features "Russia" in it, is that what's happening?

[TSA]

At this point we're just going to lose our minds over any headline that features "Russia" in it, is that what's happening?

At this point? :rollin
You all have been losing your minds over "Russia" headlines for a year straight

[Spurminator]

At this point? :rollin
You all have been losing your minds over "Russia" headlines for a year straight

"You all." :blah

What exactly is the accusation here? Is there a crime being alleged? The only thing that seems to be scandalous here is that "Clinton/DNC" and "Russia" can be included in the same story.

I don't go for every Trump/Russia collusion update that comes out but at least there's actual wrongdoing being alleged in that narrative.

You guys are inventing your own game where you get points when you say so, and you're getting mad that we're not playing along.

[hater]

Theres wrongdoing being alleged on both sides

Only one side is crying that their elections were hacked by a group of golden shower girls

[pgardn]

You're takes are FUCKED UP, as always.




OK. Got to get that conformation from Boots.

Now I know I've made sense.

YOU are what is wrong with Liberals and Democrats basically because you are a non-thinking bowl of lettuce. You are the liberal version of Trump thinking 3 million illegal votes are out there in batshit land.

You are exactly why Trump has over 1/3 of the voting public that don't waiver from his side. And you Fckn think this 36% is the top 1%... You are lost. Completely.

[pgardn]

No.

But it still does not free Clinton from questions about how extensive her working knowlege of this little part of her campaign was. And it all may be perfectly legal and common. The Republicans have clearly pulled off some of the worst crap concerning this type of behavior. But it is also clear that once the Democrats fully figured out how to make big money for campaigns under Obama's incredible fund raising capabilities they fell right into bed with some bad partners and habits. The democrats had a leg up of being considered the party of people who had little to zero say in the running of our country. This badge is stained. It's pretty clear given the last election.

So articles like the WPost put up are important for reform, if you are a Democrat anyways IMO. The Republicans as a whole are not pleased with Trump at all. They have pulled off rounding up a little over 1/3 of the vote to simply run on vengeance against 8 years of Obama. It does not matter if policy helps or hurts the country as a whole or not to these people. They see Democrats pulling the same thing; the blind following of minorities and disadvantaged (while actually getting very little done)

Look at this board as a microcosm. It runs off of thwarting the other party and vengeance, Not good policy for the whole. The Republicans were willing to put forward some of the worst health care shit ever seen just to take down Obamacare. Even though they and almost everyone else knows it needs much reform. They were willing to replace a model with much worse just to say, mission accomplished, we have screwed the country while keeping our word. That's Fd up...


That is a pretty simplistic attempt at rationalization. I don’t care one bit about boots but to try to project this pile of nonsense is not a good effort. This is hater and Chris and chuko level thinking

The above is what I had written.

If you disagree, give me your interpretation of the Trump election and democratic failings.
Go.

[Chucho]

The irony.

Hey stupid, realize in your effort to be a lying cocksucker you forgot that this was initiated by republicans during the primaries.


LOL, Boots' alt.

[pgardn]

The irony.

Hey stupid, realize in your effort to be a lying cocksucker you forgot that this was initiated by republicans during the primaries.

And the Clinton Campaign gladly slurped it up and continued funding it.

[CosmicCowboy]

Opposition research is old news. Politicians have been doing it forever. Most people realized, however that it was just mud slinging. In this case clinton paid fot the mudslinging and Obama's justice department gave it the "mark of approval" saying "people are saying this so we need to tell you what they are saying" which totally legitimized pissgate.

[Pavlov]

Why are people pretending the Clinton campaign used the dossier before the election?

[TSA]

Why are people pretending the FBI didn't use the Clinton campaign paid for dossier to obtain the FISA warrant they were previously denied?

[Pavlov]

Are you pretending the Clinton campaign ordered this?

[TSA]

Are you pretending the Clinton campaign ordered this?

No. It goes much deeper than just the Clinton campaign.

[Pavlov]

No. It goes much deeper than just the Clinton campaign.Oh, do give us your revised conspiracy theory.

[TSA]

Oh, do give us your revised conspiracy theory.

Nothing has been revised.

[Pavlov]

Nothing has been revised.Oh, well post it here so our memories can be refreshed.

[TSA]

Oh, well post it here so our memories can be refreshed.

Reference your ST notebook

[Pavlov]

Reference your ST notebookNope. If you're ashamed to state your theory and just want to be a bitch, that's your choice. I don't blame you for not wanting to commit to yet another conspiracy theory.

[boutons_deux]

Ted Lieu hilariously dangles ‘shiny object’ keys at Republicans still obsessed with ‘stupid’ Clinton investigations


https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/lieu-1-800x430.jpg

“It looks like the Republicans are trying very hard to impeach President Hillary Clinton —

but she’s not the president, she’s a private citizen,” Lieu replied

“Actually,” Lieu began as he pulled out his keys and started dangling them,

“I think the real reason the Republicans are launching these stupid investigations, is like, ‘look at the shiny object!’

They’re trying to distract and that’s why they’re really doing it.”

“They know that every week there’s something really bad about Donald Trump and

they want the public to pay attention to something else,” he stated.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/ted-lieu-hilariously-dangles-shiny-object-keys-at-republicans-still-obsessed-with-stupid-clinton-investigations/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

A fuckin ASIAN mocking, ridiculing the Repug white guys. :lol

[Th'Pusher]

Ted Lieu hilariously dangles ‘shiny object’ keys at Republicans still obsessed with ‘stupid’ Clinton investigations


https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/lieu-1-800x430.jpg

“It looks like the Republicans are trying very hard to impeach President Hillary Clinton —

but she’s not the president, she’s a private citizen,” Lieu replied

“Actually,” Lieu began as he pulled out his keys and started dangling them,

“I think the real reason the Republicans are launching these stupid investigations, is like, ‘look at the shiny object!’

They’re trying to distract and that’s why they’re really doing it.”

“They know that every week there’s something really bad about Donald Trump and

they want the public to pay attention to something else,” he stated.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/ted-lieu-hilariously-dangles-shiny-object-keys-at-republicans-still-obsessed-with-stupid-clinton-investigations/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

A fuckin ASIAN mocking, ridiculing the Repug white guys. :lol




Will trigger TSA. He’s out for your guns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Quadzilla99]

923265340225867776

[TSA]

923574031558873088

[hater]

Hope Trump sues Hillary and DNC for 200 billion

[spurraider21]

Hope Trump sues Hillary and DNC for 200 billion
Me too. Depositions will be fun.

[Pavlov]

Hope Trump sues Hillary and DNC for 200 billionLordy, I hope he does.

[boutons_deux]

What’s Up With The Times Piece on Elias, Steele and Fusion GP

the Democratic party’s top election lawyer, Marc Elias, deserves some kind of vast national, public thank you since his decision to fund the Fusion GPS/Steele research likely played a key role in blocking the ‘grand bargain’ and policy payoffs to Russia which President Trump was hoping to make in January and February of this year.

almost everything we learned last night had been known for roughly a year: specifically, that after Republican funders lost interest in probing President Trump’s ties to Russia, Democrats began funding the on-going research by Fusion GPS. What we learned last night was specifically which Democrats. A new filing from the law firm of Perkins Coie showed that it was Marc Elias who contracted Fusion GPS with funds from the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

It seems clear,

even based on the Times reporting, that the Clinton campaign did not know about Fusion GPS or what subcontractor was working on an oppo research project (nor would it have been routine for them to know).

The key point as a story is that we already knew that the project began with funding from Republicans.

what jumps out at me about the Times story: what’s not included. Let me list a few points.

* The fact that it has been publicly known for more than a year that the Fusion GPS investigation of Trump’s ties to Russia began with funding from Republicans and was later funded by Democrats. This has been known since David Corn’s report in October 2016 and reported in numerous other reports since. This is never mentioned in the Times article.

* The fact that the Fusion GPS’s

investigation into Russia began as a project funded by Republicans. This is never mentioned in the Times report,

although it’s alluded to in the letter from Perkins Coie Managing Partner Matthew J. Gehringer. (The precise timeline is this: Republicans hire Fusion GPS to investigate Trump business. Investigation quickly turns to focus on Trump’s ties to Russia. Republicans lose interest. Elias agrees to continue the funding with money from DNC/HRC campaign. Steele brought in to go deeper into Russia ties.)

* The Times report can be read to

suggest that the Clinton campaign and the DNC paid $12.4 million for the Fusion GPS research. But as the Post notes, these tabulations date back to June and November 2015, fully a year before Elias signed up Fusion GPS.

So by definition, it can’t all be for that research.

* Leaving out the first two points makes the Times piece seem quite misleading to me.

In a different category is another detail left out. As the Post notes, the Democrats stopped funding the Fusion GPS the day before the election.

But Steele had already shared his findings with the FBI because he was so alarmed by what he had found.

The FBI was sufficiently disturbed and confident in Steele’s work that they agreed to continue funding his work.

(They eventually stopped once Steele’s name became public.) This is highly relevant information for determining the quality and credibility of Steele’s findings. But it doesn’t appear in the Times report even though the lede of the Times report focuses squarely on Republican accusations about Steele and Fusion GPS.

The FBI’s confidence in Steele’s work and going so far as to agree to keep funding it seems highly relevant information in evaluating those attacks.

At the end of the day, what seems relevant to me is that the funding behind the Steele/Fusion GPS effort has been known since last year.

It had details about at least the outlines of the Russian subversion campaign long before they were publicly known.

How there’s anything bad about money from the campaign and the DNC helping to fund it is a complete mystery.

The only problem is why they didn’t do more with it since this was critical information for the public to know.

But the public was left in the dark.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/whats-up-with-the-times-piece-on-elias-steele-and-fusion-gps

it sure looks like the Times ran a hit piece on Hillary and the Dems, using old information, and ignoring that the info WAS old.

[Pavlov]

Yeah, I don't know why everyone is pretending Corn didn't write the article about Republican and Democrat funding of the dossier a full year ago.

[TSA]

NYT reporters throwing them under the bus :rollin

922955410327425027

922962880206647297

[hater]

Wow

So glad they lost

Despicable

[boutons_deux]

NYT reporters ran a hit piece on Hillary and Dems, leaving out KEY information, and presenting information as new when it was a year old and a yawner back then.

TSA is suckered again by Repugs deflecting, fabricated bullshit outrage.

[AaronY]

NYT reporters throwing them under the bus :rollin

922955410327425027

922962880206647297
NYT broke the Hillary email story into mainstream press why would you be surprised if they posted anti-Hillary? Unless you're one of these tards that thinks that anyone who posts anti-trump info is fake news

[spurraider21]

NYT broke the Hillary email story into mainstream press why would you be surprised if they posted anti-Hillary? Unless you're one of these tards that thinks that anyone who posts anti-trump info is fake news
redpill

[RandomGuy]

Ted Lieu hilariously dangles ‘shiny object’ keys at Republicans still obsessed with ‘stupid’ Clinton investigations


https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/lieu-1-800x430.jpg

“It looks like the Republicans are trying very hard to impeach President Hillary Clinton —

but she’s not the president, she’s a private citizen,” Lieu replied

“Actually,” Lieu began as he pulled out his keys and started dangling them,

“I think the real reason the Republicans are launching these stupid investigations, is like, ‘look at the shiny object!’

They’re trying to distract and that’s why they’re really doing it.”

“They know that every week there’s something really bad about Donald Trump and

they want the public to pay attention to something else,” he stated.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/ted-lieu-hilariously-dangles-shiny-object-keys-at-republicans-still-obsessed-with-stupid-clinton-investigations/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

A fuckin ASIAN mocking, ridiculing the Repug white guys. :lol


I am so going to steal that picture. Stock response to misdirections.

[RandomGuy]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html

:lol

Not surprising considering she was so inept and god-awful she couldn't win her dirty, rigged election.

What's your take on this now?

Most of the claims that can be verified out of this dossier, especially where they name names about Trump campaign staff, have panned out as true.

Including the data sharing by high level republicans with Russian intelligence assets. (see manafort's conviction)

[Chucho]

What's your take on this now?

Most of the claims that can be verified out of this dossier, especially where they name names about Trump campaign staff, have panned out as true.

Including the data sharing by high level republicans with Russian intelligence assets. (see manafort's conviction)


What's changed, toots? Nothing. She had her hand in funding the dossier. My comment, or "take", had nothing to do with the validity of the claims in the dossier just that Hillary of course funded dirt digging per par for politicians.

[TSA]

What's your take on this now?

Most of the claims that can be verified out of this dossier, especially where they name names about Trump campaign staff, have panned out as true.

Including the data sharing by high level republicans with Russian intelligence assets. (see manafort's conviction)

Manafort was instructing Page what to do in Russia?

Cohen was in Prague making the money hand off for hacked emails?

Page was a Russian agent?

Kilimnik being a Russian intelligence asset is nothing more than an accusation. He’s also been accused of being a Western asset. Take note of how Mueller’s team is trying to hide Manafort’s rebuttal on Kilimnik being a Russian asset.

1100840191093338112

[boutons_deux]

Why are people pretending the FBI didn't use the Clinton campaign paid for dossier to obtain the FISA warrant they were previously denied?

Steele was UK spook with Russian connections

his leads have been great leads