NDA lifted for FBI informant----Uranium One

[Pavlov]

972201934718369792Republicans would've leaked something already if there was any "there" there.

[Chris]

Republicans would've leaked something already if there was any "there" there.

No Adam Schiff to leak everything. Sucks to be in the dark.

[Pavlov]

No Adam Schiff to leak everything. Sucks to be in the dark.That would mean Schiff is not in the dark.

[RandomGuy]

Hannity just confirmed FBI in Arkansas is investigating Clinton Foundation.

Clinton Foundation being investigated?

For what? handing out immunizations?

Do tell.

[Chris]

978454517208571904

I wonder if it's exclusive.

[Pavlov]

978454517208571904

I wonder if it's exclusive.No way in hell the woman who was hired and unhired by Trump in two days would have him go on MSNBC if that's what you're wondering.

[Chris]

No way in hell the woman who was hired and unhired by Trump in two days would have him go on MSNBC if that's what you're wondering.

Hannity is the top show - not surprised tbh

[Pavlov]

Hannity is the top show - not surprised tbhThere's no way in hell the woman who decided she couldn't defend Trump after all would take that guy to anything but a friendly interview. Not surprised tbh.

[Chris]

"friendly interview" :lol

[Pavlov]

"friendly interview" :lolYou think Hannity is going to ask them tough questions?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

You think Hannity is going to ask them tough questions?

Yes or no.

What kind of touch questions did you have in mind? Be specific so I can answer honestly.

[Pavlov]

What kind of touch questions did you have in mind? Be specific so I can answer honestly.Anything resembling a tough question that a Fox News host wouldn't give to a woman whose husband works for Fox News and her client who wants to say bad things about Clinton and the FBI.

You know, those kinds of questions.

[Chris]

Anything resembling a tough question that a Fox News host wouldn't give to a woman whose husband works for Fox News and her client who wants to say bad things about Clinton and the FBI.

You know, those kinds of questions.

That's too vague. I need something more specific. Be honest.

[Pavlov]

That's too vague. I need something more specific. Be honest.That's incredibly specific.

You predict the toughest question he will give the wife of a Fox News employee and her client who wants to say bad things about Clinton and the FBI. Be honest.

My prediction is it will be a leading question about his mental health problem and how it was caused by the FBI.

[Chris]

So since you can't elaborate on that, maybe you can name some of the 'hard questions' Rachel Maddow would ask on MSNBC?

[Pavlov]

So since you can't elaborate on that, maybe you can name some of the 'hard questions' Rachel Maddow would ask on MSNBC?She would probably ask the wife of the Fox employee why she took on this client and why she unhired herself from Team Dennison.

[Chris]

She would probably ask the wife of the Fox employee why she took on this client and why she unhired herself from Team Dennison.

Exactly. She would talk about anything but Uranium One and the corruption that lies therein. Thank you for proving my point and you were honest. :tu

[Pavlov]

Exactly. She would talk about anything but Uranium One and the corruption that lies therein. Thank you for proving my point and you were honest. :tuShe would ask more than one question, Chris.

You know they ask more than one question, don't you Chris?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

978511286454706176

[Pavlov]

978511286454706176lol Stonewall Jackson

[Chris]

985891286698876928

[Pavlov]

985891286698876928:lol Gohmert

[djohn2oo8]

FBI informants were good in this thread. Now they are bad?

[Chris]

djohn shook AF on a Tuesday

[djohn2oo8]

djohn shook AF on a Tuesday

FBI informants good

[boutons_deux]

:lol Gohmert


:lol shit hole Texas (re)-electing many Gohmerts

[RandomGuy]

djohn shook AF on a Tuesday

Abusing political power is good when it is your guys doing it.

right?

"Lock her up"

Chicken-fucking hypocrite.

[TSA]

EXCLUSIVE: FBI Raids Home Of Whistleblower On Clinton Foundation, Lawyer Says

FBI agents raided the home of a recognized Department of Justice whistleblower who privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.

https://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/fbi-whistleblower-clinton-uranium?__twitter_impression=true

[Winehole23]

why is Trump's FBI harassing whistleblowers?

[Pavlov]

why is Trump's FBI harassing whistleblowers? Doesn't really sound like a whistleblower tbh

[Winehole23]

Doesn't really sound like a whistleblower tbhI should have blued it

[boutons_deux]

Congressional Repugs forcing Repug FBI to trash Mueller as partisan, because they/we all know Mueller is about to destroy Trash and his mafiya.

[TSA]

Doesn't really sound like a whistleblower tbh

Why do you not think he's a whistleblower?

[Pavlov]

Why do you not think he's a whistleblower?Because the FBI raided his home.

[TSA]

Because the FBI raided his home.

"Cain informed the agent while he was still at the door that he was a recognized protected whistleblower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act and that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized his whistleblower status, according to Socarras."

"After asking and getting my approval to do so, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had a member of his staff physically take Mr. Cain’s classified document disclosure to the House and Senate Intelligence committees,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

“For the bureau to show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistleblower who gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law,” he continued."



Are you saying this was a good raid by the FBI?

[djohn2oo8]

10 pages in a year? :lol

[Pavlov]

"Cain informed the agent while he was still at the door that he was a recognized protected whistleblower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act and that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized his whistleblower status, according to Socarras."

"After asking and getting my approval to do so, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had a member of his staff physically take Mr. Cain’s classified document disclosure to the House and Senate Intelligence committees,” Socarras told TheDCNF.

“For the bureau to show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistleblower who gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law,” he continued."



Are you saying this was a good raid by the FBI?Sure. There was a warrant and everything.

What's your conspiracy theory here, TSA?

[TSA]

Sure. There was a warrant and everything.

What's your conspiracy theory here, TSA?

Do you think the judge would sign off on a warrant if he was informed the person was a DOJ recognized and protected whistleblower?

[Pavlov]

Do you think the judge would sign off on a warrant if he was informed the person was a DOJ recognized and protected whistleblower?I don't know why the FBI would raid his place if they didn't think he did something wrong.

I think he may not be recognized by anyone as anything.

What's your conspiracy theory here, TSA?

Somehow Hillary is controlling the FBI from he book tour?

[Spurs Homer]

10 pages in a year? :lol


:lol:lol

[TSA]

I don't know why the FBI would raid his place if they didn't think he did something wrong.

I think he may not be recognized by anyone as anything.

Are you claiming his lawyer is lying?

[Pavlov]

Are you claiming his lawyer is lying?I'm not sure there is actually any protection granted to him if he were "recognized" as that only seems to protect the delivery of the information to Congress, which has already happened to zero effect.

[TSA]

1068725896461328385

[AaronY]

1068725896461328385
Is there like a Fake Prissy's views? And so this one has to trademark her tweets now??

[Spurminator]

Is there like a Fake Prissy's views? And so this one has to trademark her tweets now??

You can tell Fake Prissy from the overuse of emoji exclamation points. Real Prissy always uses two, no more, no less.

[AaronY]

Wonder if I can get my tweets trademarked? They are pretty good tbh

[Spurminator]

Wonder if I can get my tweets trademarked? They are pretty good tbh

https://hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Laura-Loomer.jpg
TRADEMARK MY TWEETS!!

[AaronY]

https://hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Laura-Loomer.jpg
TRADEMARK MY TWEETS!!
Loomer lol she gonna be president in 15 years at the rate this GOP keeps morphing into more and more grotesque things as time goes on..Reagan, W., Trump, etc.

[AaronY]

by that time when Trump dies MSM will be like "Say what you want about the Donald but...he loved his country and he fought" lol kind of like how they pretend W was a good nice guy now and someone who was a good GOP leader

[Nother Level]

Loomer lol she gonna be president in 15 years at the rate this GOP keeps morphing into more and more grotesque things as time goes on..Reagan, W., Trump, etc.


by that time when Trump dies MSM will be like "Say what you want about the Donald but...he loved his country and he fought" lol kind of like how they pretend W was a good nice guy now and someone who was a good GOP leader

Insight.

[Pavlov]

Insight.Derp.

[Spurtacular]

Derp.

Hillary sperm shielder.

[Pavlov]

Hillary sperm shielder.Name her crimes, derp.

You can't.

You won't.

You never will.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

Name her crimes, derp.

You can't.

You won't.

You never will.

lol derp

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her by your own definition.

Game, set, match.

[Pavlov]

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her by your own definition.

Game, set, match.I can't name any because I don't think she committed any.

Can you?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

I can't name any because I don't think she committed any.

Can you?

Yes or no.

:lmao Hillary sperm shielder by your own definition/

[Pavlov]

:lmao Hillary sperm shielder by your own definition/Can you name any of her crimes?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Can you name any of her crimes?

Yes or no.

:lol Hillary sperm shielder thinks I have something to prove...

[Pavlov]

:lol Hillary sperm shielder thinks I have something to prove...:lol you just proved you're semen shielding for her

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:cry I'm a hillary sperm shielder :cry

[Pavlov]

:cry I'm a hillary sperm shielder :cry:lmao derp

[spurraider21]

hey Spurtacular

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her.

Game, set, match.

[Spurtacular]

hey Spurtacular (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615)

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her.

Game, set, match.

Chump needs to meet his own standard, or he has labeled himself a hillary sperm shielder.

:lmao Lite trying to come to the rescue.

[Pavlov]

Chump needs to meet his own standard, or he has labeled himself a hillary sperm shielder.derp semen shielding for Hillary by any standard.

Game, set, match.

[Spurtacular]

hey Spurtacular (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615)

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her.

Game, set, match.

Also, I'm not enforcing any standard that a non-sociopath wouldn't comply with. If he's gonna make a bold statement and then not comply b/c his truth is variable, that's what sociopaths do. Come to terms with the sociopath designation of your leader.

[spurraider21]

Chump needs to meet his own standard, or he has labeled himself a hillary sperm shielder.

:lmao Lite trying to come to the rescue.
i'm asking you, not Chump.

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her.

Ball's in your court.

[Spurtacular]

derp semen shielding for Hillary by any standard.

Game, set, match.

:lmao Sociopath Pretending his designation (set by himself) not in effect.
:lmao branded himself a Hillary sperm shielder.

GAME, SET, MATCH

[Pavlov]

Also, I'm not enforcing any standard that a non-sociopath wouldn't comply with. If he's gonna make a bold statement and then not comply b/c his truth is variable, that's what sociopaths do. Come to terms with the sociopath designation of your leader.:lmao semen salad

[Spurtacular]

i'm asking you, not Chump.

Name her crimes, or sperm shield for her.

Ball's in your court.

And I don't care. This is you trying to jump in someone else's battle. Admit Chump is a sociopath and maybe I'll give a damn. Ball's in your court.

[Pavlov]

And I don't care.You care a lot about semen shielding for Hillary.

Game, set, match.

[Spurtacular]

You care a lot about semen shielding for Hillary.

Game, set, match.

You staunchly semen shield for her by your definition.

:lmao Sociopath pretending he has room to talk.
:lmao Lite sees nothing.

[Pavlov]

You staunchly semen shield for her by your definition.So do you.


Game, set, match.

[spurraider21]

And I don't care.
You don't care that you semen shield for Hillary by being unable to name a single crime?


This is you trying to jump in someone else's battle.
this is a message board, not a private messenger


Admit Chump is a sociopath and maybe I'll give a damn. Ball's in your court.
I don't evidence of him being a sociopath. Neurotic, maybe. A sociopath would be devoid of a conscience. I don't see that.

[Spurtacular]

You don't care that you semen shield for Hillary by being unable to name a single crime?


this is a message board, not a private messenger


I don't evidence of him being a sociopath. Neurotic, maybe. A sociopath would be devoid of a conscience. I don't see that.

You can be a sociopath and have a conscience, bruh. Sociopaths do however consistently disregard truth and reality when it suits them. Chump has said that a Hillary sperm shielder cannot name her crimes; yet, he then blatantly believes this doesn't apply to him. Textbook sociopathy, bro. Come to terms.

[Pavlov]

You can be a sociopath and have a conscience, bruh. Sociopaths do however consistently disregard truth and reality when it suits them. Chump has said that a Hillary sperm shielder cannot name her crimes; yet, he then blatantly believes this doesn't apply to him. Textbook sociopathy, bro. Come to terms.I never said it didn't apply to me.

But if you think it applies to me, it has to apply to you.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

I never said it didn't apply to me.

But if you think it applies to me, it has to apply to you.

lol derp

So, you admit you're a Hillary sperm shielder?

[Pavlov]

So, you admit you're a Hillary sperm shielder?If that's the definition, sure.

Do you admit you're a Hillary semen shielder?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

If that's the definition, sure.

Do you admit you're a Hillary semen shielder?

Yes or no.

That's your definition.

:lmao That you decided a Hillary sperm shielder is so much better than a sociopath.

[Pavlov]

[nonanswer]:lol shitting yourself again.

Game, set, match.

[Spurtacular]

:lol shitting yourself again.

Game, set, match.

Okay, I'll answer if you type out that you're a Hillary sperm shielder.

[Pavlov]

Okay, I'll answer if you type out that you're a Hillary sperm shielder.:lmao muh conditions

Game, set, match.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao muh conditions

Game, set, match.

You just admitted to being a Hillary sperm shielder; write it as to not give yourself wiggle room later.

[spurraider21]

You just admitted to being a Hillary sperm shielder; write it as to not give yourself wiggle room later.


If that's the definition, sure.
there you have it. if you apply the definition that one who cannot name a hillary crime is a hillary sperm shielder, than he has already stipulated to that.

you know what, i'll do the same. i'll state that if we are indeed applying that definition, then in that case i am also a hillary sperm shielder.

now derp, can you name a single hillary crime? or are you a hillary sperm shielder?

[Spurtacular]

there you have it. if you apply the definition that one who cannot name a hillary crime is a hillary sperm shielder, than he has already stipulated to that.

you know what, i'll do the same. i'll state that if we are indeed applying that definition, then in that case i am also a hillary sperm shielder.

now derp, can you name a single hillary crime? or are you a hillary sperm shielder?

You haven't been paying attention if you think Chump doesn't try to wiggle out of things after the fact. If he's claiming he's a Hillary sperm shielder he should have no problem writing it out.

[spurraider21]

So, you admit you're a Hillary sperm shielder?


If that's the definition, sure.
there's no wiggle room there. given the definition, he said "sure"

but that doesn't change anything. you're going to continue sperm shielding hillary by yet again failing to name a single (SINGLE!) crime you think she has committed

[Spurtacular]

there's no wiggle room there. given the definition, he said "sure"

He'll have no problem writing it out, then.

[spurraider21]

He'll have no problem writing it out, then.
he did. he wrote "If that's the definition, sure."

you got what you wanted. now all you're doing is sperm shielding hillary with every post.

[Pavlov]

He'll have no problem writing it out, then.:rollin MUH CONDITIONS :rollin

[Spurtacular]

he did. he wrote "If that's the definition, sure."

you got what you wanted. now all you're doing is sperm shielding hillary with every post.

Wiggle room, bruh. Notice he's unwilling to take ownership now.

:lmao Sociopath change of heart.

[Winehole23]

Did Spurtacular ever name the crimes?

[Pavlov]

Wiggle room, bruh. Notice he's unwilling to take ownership now.

:lmao Sociopath change of heart.Already took ownership.

If that's the definition, sure.

Now if that's the defintion, you have proved yourself to be a Hillary semen shielder all along.

You own it.

No wiggle room.

Game, set, match.

[Pavlov]

Did Spurtacular ever name the crimes?Nope, he's still semen shielding harder than anyone for Hillary.

[Spurtacular]

Already took ownership.

If that's the definition, sure.

Now if that's the defintion, you have proved yourself to be a Hillary semen shielder all along.

You own it.

No wiggle room.

Game, set, match.

Write it with clarity. Take ownership.

[spurraider21]

Write it with clarity. Take ownership.
:lol more demands and conditions
:lol all this time and you still can't name a single crime you think she's committed
:lol biggest hillary sperm shielder on spurstalk

[Pavlov]

Write it with clarity. Take ownership.MUH CONDITIONS

lol derp will never name a single Hillary crime

derp is forever a Hillary semen shielder.

derp owns it until the end of time.

[Pavlov]

:lol more demands and conditions
:lol all this time and you still can't name a single crime you think she's committed
:lol biggest hillary sperm shielder on spurstalkSociopath can't take ownership.

[Pavlov]

:lol more demands and conditions
:lol all this time and you still can't name a single crime you think she's committed
:lol biggest hillary sperm shielder on spurstalkSociopath can't take ownership.

[Spurtacular]

:lol more demands and conditions
:lol all this time and you still can't name a single crime you think she's committed
:lol biggest hillary sperm shielder on spurstalk

MUH CONDITIONS

lol derp will never name a single Hillary crime

derp is forever a Hillary semen shielder.

derp owns it until the end of time.

What's the reason for not writing it with clarity? Too much shame? It's a simple request.

[Pavlov]

What's the reason for not writing it with clarity?What part was unclear to you derp?

Explain your difficulty in understanding what I wrote.

It's a simple request. I want to help you out here.

[Spurtacular]

What part was unclear to you derp?

Explain your difficulty in understanding what I wrote.

It's a simple request. I want to help you out here.

The fragmentation for which you'll try to wiggle yourself out of it later. Write a clear concise sentence on it and take ownership.

[Pavlov]

The fragmentation for which you'll try to wiggle yourself out of it later.As was pointed out, there is no wiggle room.

If that's the definition, sure.


That's it. It's very clear. I own it. There is no fragmentation. There can be no wiggle attempts from me. There will be no wiggle attempts from me.

If that's the definition -- are you a Hillary semen shielder?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

As was pointed out, there is no wiggle room.

If that's the definition, sure.


That's it. It's very clear. I own it. There is no fragmentation. There can be no wiggle attempts from me. There will be no wiggle attempts from me.

If that's the definition -- are you a Hillary semen shielder?

Yes or no.

"If that's the definition" is obviously Wiggle Room Central.

:lmao Chump Lite pretending you don't play these games.

[Pavlov]

"If that's the definition" is obviously Wiggle Room CentralYou insist we use that definition. That eliminates the wiggle room.

So you're a Hillary semen shielder too.

Because you will never name a single Hillary crime.

No wiggle room.

Sorry, derp.

[benefactor]

:lol...this is reaching Avante levels of avoidance and deflection

[Spurtacular]

You insist we use that definition.

I hold you to your definition. You're trying to make it about my insistence rather than take ownership

:lmao Chump Lite pretending you aren't gonna do your games.

[Pavlov]

I hold you to your definition. You're trying to make it about my insistence rather than take ownershipI hold you to that definition as well.

At your insistence.

So you're a Hillary semen shielder too.

Because you will never name a single Hillary crime.

No wiggle room.

Sorry, derp.

lol

[TSA]

John dropping another bomb. Huber zeroing in on Bill.

Feds received whistleblower evidence in 2017 alleging Clinton Foundation wrongdoing

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation?amp&__twitter_impression=true

“The answer to the second question may reside in 6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm's partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark. And last week, a federal prosecutor suddenly asked for documents from their private investigation.

The 48-page submission, dated Aug. 11, 2017, supports its claims with 95 exhibits, including internal legal reviews that the foundation conducted on itself in 2008 and 2011.

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and "quid pro quo" promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation's longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from "commingling" personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he "knows where all the bodies are buried."



———————-


“A prosecutor working for Huber called MDA Analytics last week, seeking copies of their evidence, according to sources. The firm told the prosecutor that the FBI has possessed the evidence in its Little Rock office since early 2018, the sources said.

Some evidence that MDA investigators cited is public source, such as internal foundation reviews hacked in 2016 and given to WikiLeaks. Other materials were provided to the investigators by foreign governments that have done business with the charity, or by foundation insiders.

One of the nonpublic documents is an interview memo the MDA Analytics investigators penned after meeting with Kessel in late November 2016 at the Princeton Club in New York City.

Kessel told those investigators that "one of the biggest problems was Mr. Clinton's commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses," according to the whistleblower submission.

"There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds," states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.

"Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him," the memo added.

The memo also claims Kessel confirmed to the private investigators that private lawyers reviewed the foundation's practices - once in 2008 and the other in 2011 - and each found widespread problems with governance, accounting and conflicts of interest.

"I have addressed it before and, let me tell you, I know where all the bodies are buried in this place," the memo alleges Kessel said.”

:wow

[Pavlov]

John dropping another bomb. Huber zeroing in on Bill.

Feds received whistleblower evidence in 2017 alleging Clinton Foundation wrongdoing

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation?amp&__twitter_impression=true

“The answer to the second question may reside in 6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm's partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark. And last week, a federal prosecutor suddenly asked for documents from their private investigation.

The 48-page submission, dated Aug. 11, 2017, supports its claims with 95 exhibits, including internal legal reviews that the foundation conducted on itself in 2008 and 2011.

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and "quid pro quo" promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation's longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from "commingling" personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he "knows where all the bodies are buried."



———————-


“A prosecutor working for Huber called MDA Analytics last week, seeking copies of their evidence, according to sources. The firm told the prosecutor that the FBI has possessed the evidence in its Little Rock office since early 2018, the sources said.

Some evidence that MDA investigators cited is public source, such as internal foundation reviews hacked in 2016 and given to WikiLeaks. Other materials were provided to the investigators by foreign governments that have done business with the charity, or by foundation insiders.

One of the nonpublic documents is an interview memo the MDA Analytics investigators penned after meeting with Kessel in late November 2016 at the Princeton Club in New York City.

Kessel told those investigators that "one of the biggest problems was Mr. Clinton's commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses," according to the whistleblower submission.

"There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds," states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.

"Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him," the memo added.

The memo also claims Kessel confirmed to the private investigators that private lawyers reviewed the foundation's practices - once in 2008 and the other in 2011 - and each found widespread problems with governance, accounting and conflicts of interest.

"I have addressed it before and, let me tell you, I know where all the bodies are buried in this place," the memo alleges Kessel said.”

:wowWho is MDA Analytics LLC, TSA?

[TSA]

John dropping another bomb. Huber zeroing in on Bill.

Feds received whistleblower evidence in 2017 alleging Clinton Foundation wrongdoing

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received-whistleblower-evidence-in-2017-alleging-clinton-foundation?amp&__twitter_impression=true

“The answer to the second question may reside in 6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm's partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark. And last week, a federal prosecutor suddenly asked for documents from their private investigation.

The 48-page submission, dated Aug. 11, 2017, supports its claims with 95 exhibits, including internal legal reviews that the foundation conducted on itself in 2008 and 2011.

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and "quid pro quo" promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation's longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from "commingling" personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he "knows where all the bodies are buried."



———————-


“A prosecutor working for Huber called MDA Analytics last week, seeking copies of their evidence, according to sources. The firm told the prosecutor that the FBI has possessed the evidence in its Little Rock office since early 2018, the sources said.

Some evidence that MDA investigators cited is public source, such as internal foundation reviews hacked in 2016 and given to WikiLeaks. Other materials were provided to the investigators by foreign governments that have done business with the charity, or by foundation insiders.

One of the nonpublic documents is an interview memo the MDA Analytics investigators penned after meeting with Kessel in late November 2016 at the Princeton Club in New York City.

Kessel told those investigators that "one of the biggest problems was Mr. Clinton's commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses," according to the whistleblower submission.

"There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds," states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.

"Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him," the memo added.

The memo also claims Kessel confirmed to the private investigators that private lawyers reviewed the foundation's practices - once in 2008 and the other in 2011 - and each found widespread problems with governance, accounting and conflicts of interest.

"I have addressed it before and, let me tell you, I know where all the bodies are buried in this place," the memo alleges Kessel said.”

:wow

I doubt the timing of this is a coincidence.

1070767980341014530

[TSA]

Who is MDA Analytics LLC, TSA?


It’s in the article. Do you just fire off questions without reading the provided links?

[Pavlov]

Honestly, looks like more nothingburgers to me -- but you go right ahead and predict the criminal charges against Bill and Hillary.

[Pavlov]

It’s in the article. Do you just fire off questions without reading the provided links?So a whole company just dedicated itself to fishing for problems in the Clinton Foundation.

Looks like another nothingburger.

But call your shot -- what criminal charges are you predicting for Bill and Hillary?

[TSA]

Honestly, looks like more nothingburgers to me -- but you go right ahead and predict the criminal charges against Bill and Hillary.


One of the nonpublic documents is an interview memo the MDA Analytics investigators penned after meeting with Kessel in late November 2016 at the Princeton Club in New York City.

Kessel told those investigators that "one of the biggest problems was Mr. Clinton's commingling and use of business and donated funds and his personal expenses," according to the whistleblower submission.

"There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds," states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.

"Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him," the memo added.

The memo also claims Kessel confirmed to the private investigators that private lawyers reviewed the foundation's practices - once in 2008 and the other in 2011 - and each found widespread problems with governance, accounting and conflicts of interest.

"I have addressed it before and, let me tell you, I know where all the bodies are buried in this place," the memo alleges Kessel said.


But honestly guys this looks like a nothingburger. You are so full of shit it’s sad.

I’m not going to pretend to know all the laws surrounding charities. I’ll let Huber and his team of US attorneys figure out the crimes.

[Pavlov]

But honestly guys this looks like a nothingburger. You are so full of shit it’s sad.

I’m not going to pretend to know all the laws surrounding charities. I’ll let Huber and his team of US attorneys figure out the crimes.So you have no knowledge of the law, but you think it's a huge deal. You are so full of shit it's sad.

Pick a lane, TSA.

I did.

[Chris]

Honestly

zUyqDxa2k3w

[Pavlov]

lol Chris has no idea what is being discussed again and can only do the troll thing.

[Chris]

lol Chris has no idea what is being discussed again and can only do the troll thing.

Pavlov literally doing the troll thing right now with his sock account :lol

[Pavlov]

Pavlov literally doing the troll thing right now with his sock account :lolI am literally discussing the topic.

You aren't.

[TSA]

So you have no knowledge of the law, but you think it's a huge deal. You are so full of shit it's sad.

Pick a lane, TSA.

I did.

One doesn’t need to be an expert on laws surrounding charities to understand using them as a personal slush fund is illegal.

Why must you always semen shield for the Clintons?

[Chris]

I am literally discussing the topic.

You aren't.

Now you're doing the forum cop thing.

[Pavlov]

One doesn’t need to be an expert on laws surrounding charities to understand using them as a personal slush fund is illegal.Is that what you are accusing them of doing, TSA?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Now you're doing the forum cop thing.

And after going 2 pages of back and forth shitpostimg with derp :rollin

[Pavlov]

Now you're doing the forum cop thing.I didn't say what I thought you should do.

You can't discuss any topic to save your life, Chris.

[TSA]

Is that what you are accusing them of doing, TSA?

Yes or no.


The Clinton Foundation CFO said Bill was, so yes.

Are you calling the CFO a liar?

[Pavlov]

And after going 2 pages of back and forth shitpostimg with derp :rollinAnd TSA waves his white flag once more.

Good talk.

Nothingburger.

[Pavlov]

The Clinton Foundation CFO said Bill was, so yes.

Are you calling the CFO a liar?Show me the quote where he says exactly that.

Dude said he spent a lot.

If he really wanted to whistleblow, why not go straight to the IRS?

[Pavlov]

I mean, this guy is still listed as the CFO on the website and on his linkedin. Seems pretty stupid that he's trying to get Bill and Hillary prosecuted while running their foundation.

Starting to sound like complete bullshit now.

Sorry, TSA.

[TSA]

Show me the quote where he says exactly that.

Dude said he spent a lot.

If he really wanted to whistleblow, why not go straight to the IRS?

The CFO isn’t the whistleblower dipshit. Try and keep up.

[Chris]

:lol

[Pavlov]

The CFO isn’t the whistleblower dipshit. Try and keep up.:lol is there even a whistleblower here, TSA?

Who is it?

[TSA]

:lol is there even a whistleblower here, TSA?

Who is it?


Who is MDA Analytics LLC, TSA?

Just log off and regroup. Maybe cook up a nothingburger for dinner. Come back tomorrow with a better spin attempt.

[Pavlov]

Just log off and regroup. Maybe cook up a nothingburger for dinner. Come back tomorrow with a better spin attempt.So there is no actual whistleblower in the foundation.

The feds already had the information MDA Analytics collected.

The CFO has already been interviewed by the feds almost a year ago.

Have I missed anything?

No. I haven't.

lol nothingburger

[TSA]

EXCLUSIVE: FBI Raids Home Of Whistleblower On Clinton Foundation, Lawyer Says

FBI agents raided the home of a recognized Department of Justice whistleblower who privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.

https://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/fbi-whistleblower-clinton-uranium?__twitter_impression=true

Sounds like the raid was done to protect the chain of custody.

========================================

Releasing the raid’s justification would “seriously jeopardize the integrity of the ongoing investigation,” Hur wrote in his eight-page letter. “Making this type of information public while this investigation is ongoing could harm the government’s ability to find additional relevant evidence.”

He also stated that his office opposed the court order’s public release “to guard against possible tampering of witnesses and destruction of evidence, and to maintain the ability of the grand jury to investigate this matter.”

Hur wrote that “unsealing would expose details of the government’s investigation and impact the government’s ability to secure charges in this matter.” His letter also indicated that there were other “targets or subjects of the investigation.”
:wow

https://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/12/10/doj-clinton-foundation-raid-secret?__twitter_impression=true

[Pavlov]

How is it preserving the chain of custody if they got the same information from him in the first place, TSA?

[Chucho]

Time to reel it in and call it a day, TSA. It's over. Trump is over the hot skillet and is one tap on the rim of that sucker from being cracked and cooked.

Let's get him out, get President Pence sworn in and resume business as usual.

[Pavlov]

Sixteen FBI agents raided Dennis Cain’s Union Bridge, Maryland, home on Nov. 19 for six hours, even though Cain told them that he was a recognized whistleblower and handed classified documents over to the agents....

....Hur did not address Cain’s reported status as a protected whistleblower in his letter to the court and instead appeared to employ boilerplate objections to keep the documents out of the public. He also did not invoke national security concerns or claim that Cain possessed classified information.

Well, Cain said he was in possession of classified documents and gave them to Horowitz. The raid could have been to see if he has any other classified documents.

I have to notice the name Huber never shows up in the article-- undercover or not.

[TSA]

How is it preserving the chain of custody if they got the same information from him in the first place, TSA?

Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal

[TSA]

How is it preserving the chain of custody if they got the same information from him in the first place, TSA?


I love how this was all you were concerned about while being silent on this

“Hur wrote that “unsealing would expose details of the government’s investigation and impact the government’s ability to secure charges in this matter.” His letter also indicated that there were other “targets or subjects of the investigation.”

[Pavlov]

Sounds like the raid was done to protect the chain of custody.

2581 Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

11 Dec 2018 - 12:04:43 PM

FBI Raid on Clinton Foundation Whistleblower Necessary to Safeguard People & Evidence

2578

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

10 Dec 2018 - 11:13:47 PM

https://twitter.com/cain_nate/status/1072221511443013633��

https://archive.fo/20181211130251/https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072471575956504576

Sometimes 'intrusions' have a way of safeguarding people & evidence.

Sometimes 'intrusions' are a necessary event in order to safeguard chain of custody [post OIG WB status + doc handover protocols].

Active criminal investigations of this magnitude must be handled w/ extreme care.

The moment your name went 'live' there was no other choice.

Keep the faith, Patriot.

You are never alone.

Q

4250950

https://www.scribd.com/document/395382132/U-S-Attorney-Motion-Opposing-DCNF-Request-to-Unseal-FBI-Raid-Documents-December-7-20128��

Read carefully.

Why is the 'CLINTON FOUNDATION' back in the news?

NAMES OF WHISTLEBLOWERS BEING LEAKED OR PUT OUT FOR STRATEGIC REASONS?

NORMALLY, A WHISTLEBLOWER IS PROTECTED AND SHIELDED FROM ALL NON ESSENTIALS (CLAS).

How do you protect a valuable witness (whistleblower)?

How do you protect the chain of custody of evidence?

Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal (otherwise sealed?)

Moves & Countermoves.

Q

:lmao TSA is still keeping the faith.

[Pavlov]

I love how this was all you were concerned about while being silent on this

“Hur wrote that “unsealing would expose details of the government’s investigation and impact the government’s ability to secure charges in this matter.” His letter also indicated that there were other “targets or subjects of the investigation.”"This matter" could simply be the theft and possession of classified documents.

Q

[TSA]

Time to reel it in and call it a day, TSA. It's over. Trump is over the hot skillet and is one tap on the rim of that sucker from being cracked and cooked.

Let's get him out, get President Pence sworn in and resume business as usual.


He’s not getting impeached for his lawyer violating campaign finance law. You’re delusional.

[TSA]

:lmao TSA is still keeping the faith.


You took the bait :rollin

[Pavlov]

You took the bait :rollinSo you're just trying to fool me into thinking you are parroting Q?

[Pavlov]

He’s not getting impeached for his lawyer violating campaign finance law. You’re delusional.Now you're saying McCarthy is wrong.

The Floppening

[TSA]

So you're just trying to fool me into thinking you are parroting Q?

I wanted to see if you’d run off and search the Q board. You came back so fast you must have that shit bookmarked :lol

[TSA]

Now you're saying McCarthy is wrong.

The Floppening


Yes I disagree with McCarthy on that point.

[Pavlov]

I wanted to see if you’d run off and search the Q board. You came back so fast you must have that shit bookmarked :lolActually the Q thread in AR15.com which I do read for laughs.

So you parroted Q just to see if I could tell you were parroting Q?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Actually the Q thread in AR15.com which I do read for laughs.

So you parroted Q just to see if I could tell you were parroting Q?

Yes or no.

Of course.

[Pavlov]

Of course.So you don't believe the raid was made to preserve the chain of custody?

[Chucho]

He’s not getting impeached for his lawyer violating campaign finance law. You’re delusional.

Buddy, he's getting impeached one way or the other. I'm being broad, not looking to split hairs on the specific "why". You're delusional if you think all the obvious dots being connected, forming the picture more and more every day, are not netting anything. He's an outsider and made enemies before he was elected, he's one foot left on the stool with his neck in a noose and that stool is wobbly as fuck at best.

[TSA]

So you don't believe the raid was made to preserve the chain of custody?

Don't know and don't care.

I'm more interested in the investigation Hur was referring to.

[TSA]

Buddy, he's getting impeached one way or the other. I'm being broad, not looking to split hairs on the specific "why". You're delusional if you think all the obvious dots being connected, forming the picture more and more every day, are not netting anything. He's an outsider and made enemies before he was elected, he's one foot left on the stool with his neck in a noose and that stool is wobbly as fuck at best.

He's been in that same position on the stool since he took office and will remain there until his term is up.

[Pavlov]

Don't know and don't care.:lmao disavow all Q following while following Q


I'm more interested in the investigation Hur was referring to.What investigation do Q think he was referring to?

[Pavlov]

Buddy, he's getting impeached one way or the other. I'm being broad, not looking to split hairs on the specific "why". You're delusional if you think all the obvious dots being connected, forming the picture more and more every day, are not netting anything. He's an outsider and made enemies before he was elected, he's one foot left on the stool with his neck in a noose and that stool is wobbly as fuck at best.He's nominally into unindicted co-conspirator territory now.

Nixon resigned two months after he got that official moniker.

[Chucho]

He's been in that same position on the stool since he took office and will remain there until his term is up.


As much as I wanted that to be true to see some excitement delivered in this thread, I wouldn't bet on it.

And I've stated, I'm ready for the shit show to end and get President Pence sworn in so we can conduct business as usual.

[TSA]

:lmao disavow all Q following while following Q

What investigation do Q think he was referring to?

Stupid question....Clinton's

[Pavlov]

Stupid question....Clinton'sBut Cain already gave them the classified documents.

Why raid him?

[TSA]

But Cain already gave them the classified documents.

Why raid him?

I'm wondering the same.

[TSA]

Actually the Q thread in AR15.com which I do read for laughs.



What's your handle there?

[Pavlov]

I'm wondering the same.Maybe they think he broke the law.

Occam's warrant.

[Pavlov]

What's your handle there?I don't have one.

[TSA]

Maybe they think he broke the law.

Occam's warrant.

Yet he sits at home unindicted almost a month later. Reading his timeline on Twitter and there isn't the least bit of worry from him about being arrested.

[Pavlov]

Yet he sits at home unindicted almost a month later.Considering what was said about other investigations, this isn't unusual.

Reading his timeline on Twitter and there isn't the least bit of worry from him about being arrested.Has anyone who was arrested or indicted by the FBI/DOJ said something to the effect that they thought they would be arrested?

Remember, this guy is trying to shit on the FBI and DOJ using information he got while contracting for the FBI.

It's been almost a month and no one has verified his claim of being a protected whistleblower.

[TSA]

Play by play of the whistle blowers starts here

1073317971580346369

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1073340470120587264
TSA

[Pavlov]

Play by play of the whistle blowers starts here

1073317971580346369
1073334669079445505
lol Do Nothing Huber
lol beanz

[Chris]

Huber *possibly* good now.

[spurraider21]

Huber *possibly* good now.
depends if he's undercover or not

[Spurminator]

Distract! Counter attack! More Hillary news!

[Pavlov]

Did anyone from the DOJ, FBI or IRS testify today?

All I see are private, politically motivated organizations from beanz tbh.

[Chris]

Did anyone from the DOJ, FBI or IRS testify today?

All I see are private, politically motivated organizations from beanz tbh.

Maddow will fill you in tonight, don't worry snowflake.

[Pavlov]

Maddow will fill you in tonight, don't worry snowflake.I'm asking you directly now, Chris.

Did anyone from the DOJ, FBI or IRS testify today?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

I'm asking you directly now, Chris.

Did anyone from the DOJ, FBI or IRS testify today?

Yes or no.

I'm telling you directly now that Maddow will fill you in later, Pavlov.

Is this a disconnect?

[Pavlov]

I'm telling you directly now that Maddow will fill you in later, Pavlov.

Is this a disconnect?You can't answer this now, princess?

You're too delicate to handle a simple question on a subject you're following?

Yes.

Yes you are.

lol sensitive Chris.

[Pavlov]

I'm going to predict no one from the DOJ, FBI or IRS testified today.

That's why Chris shut himself down.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1073353461507473414

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1073353461507473414
lol pincer

[Winehole23]

Trump president not Hillary.

Red team desperate to keep has been Hillary in the news.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1073383887072624641

[Winehole23]

Right on cue Chris.

[Chris]

Right on cue Chris.

Been talking about this for a long time. Check the Hillary email thread :tu

[Nother Level]

Okay, I'll answer if you type out that you're a Hillary sperm shielder.

:lmao He went nother level and admitted he is a Hillary sperm guzzler.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1073383887072624641
welp


It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton

“Reached for comment, a DOJ spokesperson said Huber’s review is still underway.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-finds-letter-it-said-didnt-exist-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton?source=articles&via=rss

[Pavlov]

welp


It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton

“Reached for comment, a DOJ spokesperson said Huber’s review is still underway.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-finds-letter-it-said-didnt-exist-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton?source=articles&via=rss:lol TSA, that document makes Trump look worse, not better.

poor fella doesn't know what he's trying to celebrate

[Chris]

welp


It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton

“Reached for comment, a DOJ spokesperson said Huber’s review is still underway.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-finds-letter-it-said-didnt-exist-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton?source=articles&via=rss

Even the daily Satanic beast is admitting that shit :lol

[Spurs Homer]

:cry:cry:cry "uranium one!"

[boutons_deux]

Bloomberg Puts Rudy Giuliani's Ukrainium-One Lie Out Of Our Misery

Bloomberg News, which took Rudy Giuliani's evil little smear campaign (https://www.wonkette.com/meet-the-new-uranium-one-same-as-the-old-uranium-one)against Joe Biden, and dismantled it with careful reporting before it could detonate and launch shrapnel into every nook and cranny of the political ecosystem

Rudy Giuliani, who has his own interesting entanglements (https://www.businessinsider.com/rudy-giulianis-corrupt-oligarch-ukraine-2018-11) in Ukraine, has been flogging this Ukrainium One (https://www.wonkette.com/rudy-colludy-twisting-ukraines-arm-to-investigate-joe-biden) bullshit for a month now.

In Rudy's version of events, Vice President Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of US loan guarantees in 2016 if Ukraine didn't fire its chief prosecutor Viktor Shokin.

Sure there was an international consortium pushing for Shokin's ouster over massive corruption (https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190).

But Rudy knows that Biden's real motivation was to halt an investigation into his son's Ukrainian client Mykola Zlochevsky,

notwithstanding the fact that Shokin's investigation of Zlochevksy had gone dormant more than a year earlier.

Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-13/ukraine-prosecutor-made-up-biden-allegation-kiev-lawmaker-says)kids, who discovered the real forgery was actually Giuliani's documents implicating Joe Biden. Womp womp!

A Ukrainian lawmaker accused his country's top prosecutor of manufacturing a "conspiracy" about U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, adding to a political intrigue playing out from Kiev to Washington.

The lawmaker, Serhiy Leshchenko, said he had been given parts of a letter written by the prosecutor with the intent of currying favor with the Trump administration. The letter was sent by the prosecutor through unofficial channels to President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, the lawmaker told journalists on Monday in Kiev as he distributed copies of two pages.

The letter, purportedly written by Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, said that Biden, while U.S. vice president, personally received income from a Ukrainian natural gas company in exchange for "lobbying activities and political support."


By the time Bloomberg tracked him down, the prosecutor was shouting (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-16/ukraine-prosecutor-says-no-evidence-of-wrongdoing-by-bidens?utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-politics&utm_medium=social&utm_content=politics&utm_source=twitter) into any available microphone that

Hunter Biden never broke any laws and UKRAINE DOESN'T WANT ANY TROUBLE.

neither Hunter Biden nor Burisma were now the focus of an investigation.

"Hunter Biden did not violate any Ukrainian laws -- at least as of now, we do not see any wrongdoing.

https://www.wonkette.com/bloomberg-puts-rudys-ukrainium-one-lie-out-of-our-misery (https://www.wonkette.com/bloomberg-puts-rudys-ukrainium-one-lie-out-of-our-misery)

==================

Ukraine Prosecutor Made Up Biden Claim, Kiev Lawmaker Says

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-13/ukraine-prosecutor-made-up-biden-allegation-kiev-lawmaker-says (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-13/ukraine-prosecutor-made-up-biden-allegation-kiev-lawmaker-says)

[ChumpDumper]

welp


It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton

“Reached for comment, a DOJ spokesperson said Huber’s review is still underway.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-finds-letter-it-said-didnt-exist-ordering-scrutiny-of-uranium-one-hillary-clinton?source=articles&via=rssSo who will be ordered to investigate Huber for "unlawful exoneration"?

[Winehole23]

Bob Barr brought this investigation to its fruition: Trump DOJ declines to prosecute anyone for Uranium.

Spurtacular
Chucho
Chris

[Chucho]

Bob Barr brought this investigation to its fruition: Trump DOJ declines to prosecute anyone for Uranium.

Spurtacular (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=49615)
Chucho (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20531)
Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656)


Ummm, why am I tagged in this? My last post in this thread is telling TSA Trump's getting impeached, about 1.5 years ago.

[Winehole23]

Ummm, why am I tagged in this? My last post in this thread is telling TSA Trump's getting impeached, about 1.5 years ago.Looked like you were all in on page one.

[ChumpDumper]

Ummm, why am I tagged in this? My last post in this thread is telling TSA Trump's getting impeached, about 1.5 years ago.:lol "collusion"

[Chucho]

Looked like you were all in on page one.

Oh no, a position changed. Got me.

[Chucho]

:lol "collusion"

:lol your meltdown the other day

[ChumpDumper]

:lol your meltdown the other day:lol trying to change the subject
:lol "meltdown"

Seriously, what collusion were you talking about?

[Winehole23]

Oh no, a position changed. Got me.No gotcha, just curious to know what you think now. Thanks for clarifying. :tu

[Chucho]

:lol trying to change the subject
:lol "meltdown"

Seriously, what collusion were you talking about?

It seemed suspect. Pretty simple. Trump DoJ good now?


Either way, your meltdown the other day... :rollin

[SpursforSix]

Ummm, why am I tagged in this? My last post in this thread is telling TSA Trump's getting impeached, about 1.5 years ago.

What...I can't hear you. Pull Trump's cock out of your mouth. SICKO right wing gay bashing, BIGCHEM supporting, pet kicking, MAGA hat wearing lunatic.

[Chucho]

What...I can't hear you. Pull Trump's cock out of your mouth. SICKO right wing gay bashing, BIGCHEM supporting, pet kicking, MAGA hat wearing lunatic.

Step up. Answer the question. Stay on topic, this is a discussion board.

[Splits]

Seriously, what collusion were you talking about?

Collusion between the Sandy Hook crisis actors and Alex Jones

[Spurs Homer]

Lol trump repeatedly shits in chunko’s mouth-

then- after swallowing- chunko and company just open wide all over again!

[SpursforSix]

Step up. Answer the question. Stay on topic, this is a discussion board.

Do you suck Trump's dick?
Yes or fold.

[SpursforSix]

Lol trump repeatedly shits in chunko’s mouth-

then- after swollowing - chunko and company just open wide all over again!

https://media3.giphy.com/media/l46CA1409msuktEs0/giphy.gifhttps://media.giphy.com/media/HEsxX4leFLlNS/giphy.gifhttps://media.giphy.com/media/EKUbuW77CvlXq/giphy.gif

https://i.gifer.com/4XCs.gifhttps://us.v-cdn.net/5020263/uploads/editor/qb/sqbgdwk9vqdg.gifhttps://media0.giphy.com/media/HeAZoVifW5qsU/200.webp?cid=790b7611ba41dfb019767c166c81ceb389381 9128ab9baa3&rid=200.webp

[Spurs Homer]

Lolol ^

[Chucho]

Lol trump repeatedly shits in chunko’s mouth-

then- after swollowing - chunko and company just open wide all over again!

Sounds like a Friday night in your mother's trailer, tbh.

You made an alt of me. :lol

[SpursforSix]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS7UoVmu3-wR6EECaKeFZK0ExVCu2P053psdo-Pg1BZCgFMmsDE&s

[Chucho]

Do you suck Trump's dick?
Yes or fold.

Bend over, I'll show you yes or fold.

[SpursforSix]

Bend over, I'll show you yes or fold.

your fold is noted

[Spurs Homer]

Sounds like a Friday night in your mother's trailer, tbh.

You made an alt of me. :lol


hahaha


no

i dont do alts dmchunko

but i saw you posting that earlier and laughed

its pretty fucking spot on- you must admit

:lol:lol

[Chucho]

hahaha


no

i dont do alts dmchunko

but i saw you posting that earlier and laughed

its pretty fucking spot on- you must admit

:lol:lol


You think I'm DMC, so I think you're DMChucho.

[Spurs Homer]

You think I'm DMC, so I think you're DMChucho.

i just point out that you post in defense of

Defending
Muh
Cheetoe

24/7


you sound exactly like him, believe exactly what he believes, defend exactly what he defends, jump in his defense anytime he is exposed as a complete idiot

and

NEVER

diverge from that

but if you say so - ill take your word there are TWO of you


:lol god help us!

[Chucho]

i just point out that you post in defense of

Defending
Muh
Cheetoe

24/7


you sound exactly like him, believe exactly what he believes, defend exactly what he defends, jump in his defense anytime he is exposed as a complete idiot

and

NEVER

diverge from that

but if you say so - ill take your word there are TWO of you


:lol god help us!


Um, ok, Bonnerific.

[Winehole23]

Lol trump repeatedly shits in chunko’s mouth-

then- after swollowing - chunko and company just open wide all over again!it's unsurprising people take you for bonnerific.you're just as annoying and spiteful.

[ChumpDumper]

It seemed suspect. Pretty simple.You specifically said collusion.

What collusion?

[Spurs Homer]

it's unsurprising people take you for bonnerific.you're just as annoying and spiteful.

lol

ok

bonnerific imo was funny as shit- but if you paid attention- he nailed his takes very accurately

[Spurtacular]

It seemed suspect. Pretty simple. Trump DoJ good now?


Either way, your meltdown the other day... :rollin

:lmao ChumpHumper

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao ChumpHumperWith the notable exception of the AG, they've been just fine.

What's your opinion of them?

[Spurtacular]

With the notable exception of the AG, they've been just fine.

What's your opinion of them?

:cry With the notable exception of cases that hurt muh narrative :cry

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:cry With the notable exception of cases that hurt muh narrative :cry

:lmaoActually all the cases have been fine.

What's your opinion of Trump's DOJ with these cases?

[Spurtacular]

Actually all the cases have been fine.

What's your opinion of Trump's DOJ with these cases?

Beating DOJs from recent memory. :tu

[ElNono]

Bob Barr brought this investigation to its fruition: Trump DOJ declines to prosecute anyone for Uranium.

Spurtacular
Chucho
Chris

Qhris with the crickets, per the usual bads... also, don't forget the OP... :lol

[Winehole23]

Qhris with the crickets, per the usual bads... also, don't forget the OP... :lolYou're right, TSA needs to get his ass back in here.

[Reck]

Ah, when TSA was at his peak.

:lol Also Sessions and Trump are pedo busters. “member det one?

[Winehole23]

Erstwhile op-ed columnist John Solomon's anonymous sauce for the Uranium One story that prompted the appointment of John Huber to investigate HRC, was a client of his personal lawyer, Victoria Toensing.

Unrelatedly, Toensing and her husband Joe DiGenova also did free oppo research for Trump in Ukraine.

1215697438067040256

[Winehole23]

Who was the tip of the journalistic spear for Trump's Ukraine disinfo op?

John Solomon.

[ChumpDumper]

Beating DOJs from recent memory. :tu

You're pleased with their total exoneration of Hillary.:tu

[Spurtacular]

You're pleased with their total exoneration of Hillary.:tu

When was Hillary exonerated of anything?

[Momo]

When was Hillary exonerated of anything?

woooo wooooo boogie boogie

You seem sad. Is it really worth it?

[Reck]

When was Hillary exonerated of anything?

Please keep up.

[Spurtacular]

Please keep up.

Tranny has no answer, just bitter tears.

[ChumpDumper]

When was Hillary exonerated of anything?What did they charge her with?

No charges = exoneration.

[Spurtacular]

What did they charge her with?

No charges = exoneration.

That's not how it works.

Certainly not how "total exoneration" works.

lol Dump

[ChumpDumper]

That's not how it works.

lol DumpOh, has she been charged with anything at all?

Yes or no.

Tell me how that works.

[Spurtacular]

Oh, has she been charged with anything at all?

Yes or no.

Tell me how that works.

She's not absolved of blame. She's not being charged at this time.

[ChumpDumper]

She's not absolved of blame. She's not being charged at this time.Blame for what?

Tell me how that works.

[Spurtacular]

You're pleased with their total exoneration of Hillary.:tu

I'm "pleased" with a DOJ that's not burning children alive or facilitating assault weapons for cartels. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

I'm "pleased" with a DOJ that's not burning children alive or facilitating assault weapons for cartels. :tu:lol moar conspiracies :tu

[pgardn]

I'm "pleased" with a DOJ that's not burning children alive or facilitating assault weapons for cartels. :tu

Reverse pivot.

Turnover.
We’re going the other way.

[Reck]

She's not absolved of blame. She's not being charged at this time.

This proofs you need chump to keep you company on your lonely nights. This is such a retarded, nonsensical point you just made.

Or maybe you really don’t know what how exonerations work.

Hillary doesn’t need to be exonerated because she has never been on trial for anything. Like how can someone be absolved or not absolved of something when there is nothing to prove either way.

[ChumpDumper]

This proofs you need chump to keep you company on your lonely nights. This is such a retarded, nonsensical point you just made.

Or maybe you really don’t know what how exonerations work.

Hillary doesn’t need to be exonerated because she has never been on trial for anything. Like how can someone be absolved or not absolved of something when there is nothing to prove either way.I don't think he realized I was using Trump's term on him.

Figures.

[Winehole23]

Where is Bill Barr? Haven't seen him much lately.

1316161733078192129