PDA

View Full Version : Conspiracy theorists are pieces of ****



RandomGuy
10-27-2017, 06:22 AM
Wow.

Just when I thought the dumb couldn't get any worse, it does. Conspiracy theorists are so fucking stupid it is harmful. That crosses a line, IMO.

9-11 was not an inside job.
Sandy Hook was not faked.
We landed on the moon.
Chemtrails are not real.

Now we have to add:

Las Vegas was not faked.

----------------------------------------------------------

'I hope someone truly shoots you': online conspiracy theorists harass Vegas victims

Braden Matejka survived a bullet to the head in the Las Vegas massacre. Then, the death threats started coming.
“You are a lying piece of s**t and I hope someone truly shoots you in the head,” a commenter wrote to Matejka on Facebook, one week after a gunman*killed 58 people*and injured hundreds more. “Your soul is disgusting and dark! You will pay for the consequences!” said another. A Facebook meme quickly spread with a photo of him after the shooting, captioned: “I’m a lying ****!”
The 30-year-old victim – who narrowly*escaped*death in the*worst mass shooting in modern US history*– has faced a torrent of online abuse and harassment, forcing him to shut down his social media accounts and disappear from the internet. The bullying, taunting and graphic threats have also spread to his family and friends.
“There are all these families dealing with likely the most horrific thing they’ll ever experience, and they are also met with hate and anger and are being attacked online about being a part of some conspiracy,” said Taylor Matejka, Braden’s brother, who shared with the Guardian dozens of screenshots of the abuse. “It’s madness. I can’t imagine the thought process of these people. Do they know that we are actual people?”
Conspiracy theorists – some of whom claim that the government staged the shooting on 1 October or that the tragedy was a hoax – have targeted survivors and victims’ loved ones, spamming every social media platform with misinformation and abuse. On*Facebook*and YouTube in particular, users have published viral posts and videos calling people like Braden “crisis actors”, alleging they were hired to pose as victims.
While fringe conspiracies have often emerged after national tragedies and major historical events, social media has dramatically expanded the scope and scale of the problem, making it easy for false claims to reach massive audiences and giving trolls easy access to targets online.
“It makes you angry,” said Rob McIntosh, 52, who was shot in the chest and arm in Las Vegas and has since been accused of being an actor who faked his injuries. “You’ve already been through something that’s traumatic and terrible, and you have someone who is attacking your honesty. You don’t even have the opportunity to respond.”
‘I hope someone comes after you’
Braden Matejka, from British Columbia, Canada, traveled to Las Vegas with his girlfriend, Amanda Homulos, to celebrate his 30th birthday at a country music festival. Police say the*gunman, Stephen Paddock, whose motives remain unknown, fired into the*crowd of people*at the outdoor concert from a 32nd-floor room of the Mandalay Bay hotel.
As the couple was fleeing, Braden was knocked down by a bullet in the back of his head, landing on his face. He was covered in blood, but remained responsive, and he and his girlfriend, who was not hit, quickly made it inside the car of another concertgoer, who drove them to a hospital.
The wound to his skull was not life-threatening, and days later, the couple gave an*emotional interview*on camera to the Associated Press about their escape.
“I’m just so grateful that we’re still here, and I can’t even express how sorry I am for people that didn’t make it out,” Homulos said through sobs. In another video interview,*published by the Guardian*and other news organizations, Braden explained that the bullet was very close to killing him: “If it was an inch over … it would’ve been in my brain, and I would’ve been gone.”

His brother Taylor and others began promoting on Facebook a GoFundMe campaign to help raise money for Braden, who was suffering from bleeding and swelling in his brain and blurred vision. The heavy-duty mechanic and welder also had to take time off work.
Friends and relatives posted messages of love and support in response. But soon, the nasty messages began to arrive, with strangers sending comments at such a rapid rate that it was hard for the family to keep up.
“Obviously a TERRIBLE CRISIS ACTOR,” wrote a Facebook user named Samantha. “HE’S SCAMMING THE PUBLIC … This was a government set up.”
“YOUR A LIAR AND THEFT PIECE OF CRAP [sic],” wrote Karen.
“You’ll pay on the other side,” said a user named Mach. Others called Braden a “LYING BASTARD”, “scumbag govt actor” and “f***in FRAUD”, while one user named Josh wrote: “I hope someone comes after you and literally beats the living f*** outa you.”
Taylor, 28, recalled: “I was just blown away by what these people were saying.”
One woman posted 26 consecutive messages under Taylor’s request for donations for his brother, saying she had been a nurse for more than two decades and that she was certain Braden was a liar and con artist.
Chased off the internet
Braden tried to defend himself, but eventually gave up and deleted his Facebook and Instagram accounts. Some said the decision was further evidence that he was part of a government-organized hoax – a staged fake shooting meant to help push gun control policies.
Taylor said he tried to respond to the conspiracy theorists, but nothing seemed to work: “I’d be happy to talk to these people, but it seems there’s no reasoning. A really sad part of this is that a lot of these people think they’re fighting the good fight and exposing truth.”
By some measures, YouTube seems to be making the problem worse. This week, a search for “Braden Matejka” on the Google-owned video platform suggested a video titled “How To Spot Crisis Actors & Fakest News Ever” as one of the top results. That’s despite the fact that YouTube said it was immediately*changing its algorithm to better promote legitimate sources*after Las Vegas victims*criticized the site for spreading conspiracies.
Mike Cronk, another Las Vegas survivor, was also widely targeted by conspiracy theorists after he did interviews with*ABC*and*NBC*news stations. So many users on YouTube have published videos calling him a fake that a search for his name autocompleted to “Mike Cronk crisis actor” and “Mike Cronk fake”. The top three search results for “Mike Cronk Las Vegas” were conspiracy videos, promoted higher than the ABC News segment.
McIntosh, Cronk’s friend who is slowly recovering from his bullet wounds, said the websites bore some responsibility. “If they’re putting it online and promoting it, they should be accountable for that. They are providing a service … they need to police it.”
Taylor said he recognized that it was difficult for social media sites to monitor and censor content, but that at the least, they should should prioritize verified news sources above false content: “People should be able to discover the truth first.”
After the Guardian inquired about specific videos attacking survivors,*YouTubetook down one of them targeting Braden Matejka for violating its “harassment and bullying” policy, but did not remove the others.
“We work to quickly remove videos violating our*policies*when they are flagged,” a spokesperson said in an email.
Taylor Matejka said he tried to laugh off the conspiracy theorists targeting his family, but given the killings in Las Vegas, it was hard to ignore the death threats.
“If you want to spend your whole life searching conspiracies on the internet, you’re free to do that,” he said, “but it shouldn’t come at a cost to the victim’s wellbeing.”


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/i-hope-someone-truly-shoots-you-online-conspiracy-theorists-harass-vegas-victims/ar-AAu66jn?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

Spurtacular
10-27-2017, 08:04 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

DarrinS
10-27-2017, 08:17 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

:lol

RandomGuy
10-30-2017, 11:21 AM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

Good question.

I don't believe we have enough evidence to conclusively prove this.

It is obvious they were trying, and still are making efforts, based on what our intelligence services and other open source information have been saying.

SnakeBoy
10-30-2017, 11:50 AM
:lol

DMC
10-30-2017, 12:05 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

:bobo

DeadlyDynasty
10-30-2017, 12:19 PM
RandomGuy (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1813)

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?
gotDAYUM

Nbadan
10-30-2017, 04:10 PM
/o/

RandomGuy
10-30-2017, 04:28 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

"I don't like it, so it is a conspiracy theory". :lol

Global warming is real, and we are causing it.

Evolution is real.

Vaccines are safe.

Not impressed.

Spurtacular
10-30-2017, 05:38 PM
"I don't like it, so it is a conspiracy theory". :lol

Global warming is real, and we are causing it.

Evolution is real.

Vaccines are safe.

Not impressed.

Sounds like you've decided that you are the lone arbiter of truth and justice. How noble of you.

boutons_deux
10-31-2017, 04:20 AM
Rick Wiles: Las Vegas Massacre Was Carried Out By ‘A Gay/Lesbian Nazi Regime’

End Times broadcaster Rick Wiles continues (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-las-vegas-massacre-was-carried-out-by-a-top-secret-government-death-squad/) to insist (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-shadow-government-death-squads-murdered-antonin-scalia/) that the recent massacre in Las Vegas was carried out a top secret death squad controlled by a secret world government that is “a gay/lesbian Nazi regime.”

“America has become a Nazi state.

The deep state is a Nazi state,” Wiles said.

“That is why Campos appeared on a daytime talk show hosted by a fast-talking, dancing comedienne, and, let me add,

a lesbian, because this Nazi regime is a gay/lesbian Nazi regime,

just like Nazis in Hitler’s day.

Hitler was a bisexual,

the top Nazi leaders of the Nazi party were homosexuals.

The Nazi takeover of Germany was a militant homosexual fascist takeover;

that is what is taking place in America today.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/rick-wiles-las-vegas-massacre-was-carried-out-by-a-gaylesbian-nazi-regime/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=rww&utm_campaign=bestof

so-called Christian pastors are mostly pieces of shit, too, with probably large and tithing believers.

Warlord23
10-31-2017, 05:33 AM
Supporters of the Trumpified GOP will believe anything.

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-harder-worker-past-presidents-republicans-say-new-poll-693529

58% of Republicans and 66% of Trumpanzees believe that Chump is the hardest working president since WW2. Never mind that he's spent 75 days out of 279 on the golf course, and has been in Trump-branded properties 1 out of every 3 days. Look at all the tweeting he's done - that's enough to put him above Truman and Eisenhower.

RandomGuy
10-31-2017, 10:43 AM
Sounds like you've decided that you are the lone arbiter of truth and justice. How noble of you.

I am not, by any stretch of the imagination. I always encourage people to verify and test information for themselves. That is really the best way to the truth.

RandomGuy
10-31-2017, 10:45 AM
Supporters of the Trumpified GOP will believe anything.

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-harder-worker-past-presidents-republicans-say-new-poll-693529

58% of Republicans and 66% of Trumpanzees believe that Chump is the hardest working president since WW2. Never mind that he's spent 75 days out of 279 on the golf course, and has been in Trump-branded properties 1 out of every 3 days. Look at all the tweeting he's done - that's enough to put him above Truman and Eisenhower.

http://trumpgolfcount.com/

72 trips.

cost to taxpayers: $76M, a good deal of which went to Trumps own pocket.

RandomGuy
10-31-2017, 10:46 AM
Sounds like you've decided that you are the lone arbiter of truth and justice. How noble of you.

Feel free to tell me how the earth is 6000 years old, and evolution is a conspiracy theory. Do tell.

SpursforSix
10-31-2017, 01:27 PM
Feel free to tell me how the earth is 6000 years old, and evolution is a conspiracy theory. Do tell.

So you're saying that every one that believes in any conspiracy believes in all of them?

RandomGuy
10-31-2017, 02:32 PM
So you're saying that every one that believes in any conspiracy believes in all of them?

Sorry if that was the impression. No I am not saying that. Just picking one of the easier ones out of the bunch as an example. :stirpot:

SpursforSix
10-31-2017, 02:44 PM
Sorry if that was the impression. No I am not saying that. Just picking one of the easier ones out of the bunch as an example. :stirpot:

Fair enough

Spurtacular
10-31-2017, 05:59 PM
I am not, by any stretch of the imagination. I always encourage people to verify and test information for themselves. That is really the best way to the truth.

And yet, you believe your "tests" are superior at the end of the day.

Spurtacular
10-31-2017, 06:00 PM
Feel free to tell me how the earth is 6000 years old, and evolution is a conspiracy theory. Do tell.

Have I ever called evolution a conspiracy theory? Just because you got your balls in a tuck about creationism, doesn't mean a thing to me....

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 02:04 PM
Have I ever called evolution a conspiracy theory? Just because you got your balls in a tuck about creationism, doesn't mean a thing to me....

Again, it was just an example, but no, I have never seen you say that, to be clear.

Doesn't matter really. You don't have the chops to defend anything you think is true anyway, and we both know it.

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 02:07 PM
And yet, you believe your "tests" are superior at the end of the day.

superior "tests"?

Dude, you aren't even making sense now. :lol

Dooble Hoffa fribbity jibbet?

SpursforSix
11-01-2017, 02:21 PM
superior "tests"?

Dude, you aren't even making sense now. :lol

Dooble Hoffa fribbity jibbet?

Pingle pooder sparkle klompus?

SpursforSix
11-01-2017, 02:25 PM
Again, it was just an example, but no, I have never seen you say that, to be clear.

Doesn't matter really. You don't have the chops to defend anything you think is true anyway, and we both know it.

Whoa...what the fuck. So if someone is uneducated and/or not articulate enough to express their side, then their opinion can be dismissed?

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 03:13 PM
Whoa...what the fuck. So if someone is uneducated and/or not articulate enough to express their side, then their opinion can be dismissed?

Goodness no. Education or being articulate has little to do with dismissing opinions. Uneducated people can have perfectly valid opinions, and even be able to support them reasonably.

My comment was more inclined toward the fact that Spurtacular sucks at reasoning. The whole 9-11 controlled demolition issue says as much. Honest people, who care about the truth, do not shy away from asking, or answering questions. Valid assertions of truth will stand up to questioning, and will have supporting evidence.

When a theory/assertion can be shown to be false, that is when you chuck it into the wastebin of history, and that is independent of who puts the theory forward.

Spurtacular's opinions are not shitty because he has them. They are just shitty, and he doesn't seem to care. Their shittiness is independent of him.

He is however a shitty reasoner, because good reasoners don't hold on to shitty ideas after they have been clearly shown to be so.

I hope that clears it up.

The twin towers fell because of damage and uncontrolled fires. They were not brought down by explosives or thermite, or nanothermite, or space lasers.

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 04:37 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

:lol

:lol

So let's treat this like a regular conspiracy theory. Either it works or it doesn't.

Step one is to generally gauge plausibility.

We know: Russia views the idea of popular democracy as a threat, and has worked, through various efforts at undermining it.
Donald Trump is very friendly towards Russia.

So here we have motive. Russia would have a clear preference of candidates, and an extra motive to monkey with US processes in order to create divisiveness and polarization.

Russia's intelligence services have retained a lot of their Cold War capability. It is about the only thing they have going for them, aside from enough drunk stupid conscripts to throw at the dinky countries that stand up to them.

This much is basic.

Russia has both motive, and capability to act. There is the first leg of plausibility.

SnakeBoy
11-01-2017, 04:51 PM
:lol

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 05:19 PM
Next leg is to see how plausible moving something as large as the US election is.

Electoral vote difference:
306 total trump electoral votes out of 270 needed.
Clinton won 232.

She would have needed 38 Electoral votes to cinch it with 270, and that would have taken Trump below the threshold.

Swap 38 electoral college votes and that would do it.

What is the minimum number of votes that would have to be changed to effect this election?

Sort vote totals by margin, considering states that voted for Trump, lowest to highest. Drop maine with its proportional vote system.

Then run a cumulative total of delegates for each state until you get to, or exceed that magic number.

Took 3 states to do that. Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, collectively award 46 electoral college votes.

Total margin of votes in those three states: 77744.

Divide that by two, to find the "flip" number. (i.e. subtract from Trump total, then add to Clinton)

38,000 people.

Out of total votes cast, in those states, that represents 0.278%

It is plausible that Russian efforts affected 0.278% of the electorate in just three states?

This is a finely balanced scale. One might discount the overall effect of anything the Russians did, but this is a very thin margin. It certainly wouldn't take some colossal ad buy, or boots on the ground effort.

Second leg of plausibility seems intact.

1) An actor that has motive and capability.
2) An election decided by a razor thin margin.

RandomGuy
11-01-2017, 05:20 PM
:lol

:lol

Easy to flesh out. As noted bullshit conspiracy theories fall apart, and usually pretty quickly.

Do you think nothing happened?

SnakeBoy
11-01-2017, 06:46 PM
:lol

DMC
11-01-2017, 06:53 PM
Whoa...what the fuck. So if someone is uneducated and/or not articulate enough to express their side, then their opinion can be dismissed?

Pretty much

DMC
11-01-2017, 06:54 PM
So let's treat this like a regular conspiracy theory. Either it works or it doesn't.

Step one is to generally gauge plausibility.

We know: Russia views the idea of popular democracy as a threat, and has worked, through various efforts at undermining it.
Donald Trump is very friendly towards Russia.

So here we have motive. Russia would have a clear preference of candidates, and an extra motive to monkey with US processes in order to create divisiveness and polarization.

Russia's intelligence services have retained a lot of their Cold War capability. It is about the only thing they have going for them, aside from enough drunk stupid conscripts to throw at the dinky countries that stand up to them.

This much is basic.

Russia has both motive, and capability to act. There is the first leg of plausibility.
Everything you've posted above is part and parcel of almost any conspiracy theory.

TeyshaBlue
11-01-2017, 06:57 PM
Next leg is to see how plausible moving something as large as the US election is.

Electoral vote difference:
306 total trump electoral votes out of 270 needed.
Clinton won 232.

She would have needed 38 Electoral votes to cinch it with 270, and that would have taken Trump below the threshold.

Swap 38 electoral college votes and that would do it.

What is the minimum number of votes that would have to be changed to effect this election?

Sort vote totals by margin, considering states that voted for Trump, lowest to highest. Drop maine with its proportional vote system.

Then run a cumulative total of delegates for each state until you get to, or exceed that magic number.

Took 3 states to do that. Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, collectively award 46 electoral college votes.

Total margin of votes in those three states: 77744.

Divide that by two, to find the "flip" number. (i.e. subtract from Trump total, then add to Clinton)

38,000 people.

Out of total votes cast, in those states, that represents 0.278%

It is plausible that Russian efforts affected 0.278% of the electorate in just three states?

This is a finely balanced scale. One might discount the overall effect of anything the Russians did, but this is a very thin margin. It certainly wouldn't take some colossal ad buy, or boots on the ground effort.

Second leg of plausibility seems intact.

1) An actor that has motive and capability.
2) An election decided by a razor thin margin.

Not denying the possibility but with a little ad background under my belt, a 0.278% return on a basic spam campaign would be pretty aamazing imo.

RandomGuy
11-02-2017, 08:14 AM
Not denying the possibility but with a little ad background under my belt, a 0.278% return on a basic spam campaign would be pretty aamazing imo.

But within the realm of possibility, yes?

Remember we aren't trying to definitively pin anything down, merely evaluate the underlying plausibility, so we can figure out how much evidence we would generally need to firmly establish a theory as being a good one.

Spam ad campaigns though, generally aren't of "push button" emotional topics that play to human psychology's darker side of confirmation bias and such. Think of how effective a spam campaign would be, if you could get gullible old people to forward it endlessly.

RandomGuy
11-02-2017, 08:17 AM
Everything you've posted above is part and parcel of almost any conspiracy theory.

Indeed. It is what makes them attractive to people.

But it is still the first step in evaluating any theory, yes?

A theory about magic invisible gnomes with wings pushing everything towards the center of the earth is not plausible on its face. As such it would require a LOT of evidence to prove to a reasonable degree.

RandomGuy
11-02-2017, 08:18 AM
:lol

:sleep

Continuing an unbroken streak of not really contributing anything of value to any conversation ever. :tu

DMC
11-02-2017, 12:47 PM
Indeed. It is what makes them attractive to people.

But it is still the first step in evaluating any theory, yes?

A theory about magic invisible gnomes with wings pushing everything towards the center of the earth is not plausible on its face. As such it would require a LOT of evidence to prove to a reasonable degree.

No it's not. You have to have evidence not just suspicion and not just motive.

I think you're misusing the term Theory.

RandomGuy
11-02-2017, 12:58 PM
No it's not. You have to have evidence not just suspicion and not just motive.

I think you're misusing the term Theory.

(shrugs)

Working hypothesis.

Pick a working term, I'll roll with it.

If you have evidence that something happened, you need a working hypothesis to attempt to explain the "how". In this you are correct, evidence should come first.

We have that in the form of intelligence assessments, backed by various private and public organizations.

Regardless of the nitpicking about exact order, and terminology, a method of vetting such hypotheses is useful, especially when determining how much evidence is needed to get to a reasonable conclusion, yes?

RandomGuy
11-02-2017, 01:53 PM
Here's a thread I started on conspiracy theorists.
http://www.houseofpolitics.com/threads/definition-of-a-conspiracy-theory2.18800/

(jumps)

GAAAH, quit sneaking up on me like that. Halloween is over.

TeyshaBlue
11-02-2017, 03:40 PM
(jumps)

GAAAH, quit sneaking up on me like that. Halloween is over.

The Ghost of Tautology Present. :lol

DMC
11-02-2017, 04:26 PM
The Ghost of Tautology Present. :lol

From the Department of Redundancy Department

boutons_deux
04-06-2018, 04:21 PM
Charisma Helps Corsi Promote Deep-State Conspiracy Theory

Right-wing media operation Newsmax (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/organizations/newsmax/) is using Pentecostal publisher Charisma (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/organizations/charisma/) to promote Jerome Corsi’s latest conspiracy-theory book,

“Killing the Deep State: The Fight to Save President Trump,”

which was released a few weeks ago.

A Newsmax promotional page promises that Corsi “lays it all out—

from the alarming evidence for the coup d’état to take out President Trump —

to the plan that will allow the president and patriots to destroy this dangerous shadow government for good.”

Newsmax is offering the book free ($4.95 for shipping) if you sign up for a trial subscription to Newsmax Magazine ($39.95/year).

A Thursday afternoon email from Newsmax promoting the book was identified as a sponsorship message to subscribers of Charisma Media’s newsletter.

The Newsmax/Charisma email includes a helpful graphic showing the “cast of characters” in Corsi’s book,

including

President Trump as “The Hero,”

Attorney General Jeff Sessions as “The Patsy,” and

guess who as “The Truth Teller”:

http://files.rightwingwatch.org/uploads/Corsi-cast-350x460.jpg

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/charisma-helps-corsi-promote-deep-state-conspiracy-theory/

Thar's Gold In Them Thar Conspiracies

AaronY
04-06-2018, 04:29 PM
Totally forgot randomguy got owned by Derptacular

RandomGuy
04-06-2018, 06:01 PM
Totally forgot randomguy got owned by Derptacular

https://media1.tenor.com/images/86de69721595a46f2384aa50a1e8ba12/tenor.gif?itemid=4867464

Easy to forget something that never happened.

hater
04-06-2018, 06:39 PM
RandomGuy

Did the Russians steal the 2016 election?

:lmao :lol :lmao :lol

Poor OP

The poor guys thinks very little of himself :lmao

hater
04-06-2018, 06:40 PM
No it's not. You have to have evidence not just suspicion and not just motive.

I think you're misusing the term Theory.

:lmao epic fail thread

FuzzyLumpkins
04-07-2018, 11:19 AM
Totally forgot randomguy got owned by Derptacular

Read more like the conspiratards having a circle jerk and acting like smilies are a convincing emotional disposition.

pgardn
04-07-2018, 11:24 AM
I kind of enjoy hater presenting all this utterly stupid shit.

Its good comedy. The US will learn something about people purposely enjoying the most bizarre theories. It’s helpful to know hater is free to be a wacko if he wishes.

Spurtacular
04-07-2018, 12:41 PM
I kind of enjoy hater presenting all this utterly stupid shit.

Its good comedy. The US will learn something about people purposely enjoying the most bizarre theories. It’s helpful to know hater is free to be a wacko if he wishes.

Yea, he realizes that you need a coping mechanism.

AaronY
04-07-2018, 04:36 PM
Read more like the conspiratards having a circle jerk and acting like smilies are a convincing emotional disposition.
Nah, he got dickslapped

pgardn
04-07-2018, 04:44 PM
Yea, he realizes that you need a coping mechanism.

The tranny hound expounds upon coping mechanisms...
Alrighty then.

Reck. Get in here, someone needs you.

Expert
04-07-2018, 04:50 PM
The tranny hound expounds upon coping mechanisms...
Alrighty then.

Reck. Get in here, someone needs you.
You calling Reck a tranny? :lol

FuzzyLumpkins
04-07-2018, 08:08 PM
Nah, he got dickslapped

You're easily impressed by spam and smilies.

AaronY
04-07-2018, 09:35 PM
Lol. He got destroyed. Deal with it

FuzzyLumpkins
04-07-2018, 10:56 PM
Lol. He got destroyed. Deal with it

Lol, it was a pointless circle jerk with a bunch of smilies. That type of shit stopped being impressive to me at age 12.

TSA
04-07-2018, 11:05 PM
Lol, it was a pointless circle jerk with a bunch of smilies. That type of shit stopped being impressive to me at age 12.

:lol impressed with circle jerks at any age

AaronY
04-08-2018, 12:25 AM
Muh Russia! It's not for laughing! Help me Mueller, you're my only hope!

AaronY
04-10-2018, 02:18 AM
Here are some theories for you.
http://well-temperedforum.groupee.net/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9130004433/m/6371082656/p/1
Wow, that was wonderful. Thank you so much!

FuzzyLumpkins
04-10-2018, 08:48 AM
Muh Russia! It's not for laughing! Help me Mueller, you're my only hope!

You seem to fail to grasp how the Russia investigation is going to play with the next two elections. Given how the house and senate GOP have been carrying on playing interference for the WH the linkage is extremely clear. They vote for him as a bloc 95% of the time.

The investigation is going to be playing through the upcoming November election swaying independents and motivating the liberal base. It's infinitely better than Benghazi and the emails and those absolutely eviscerated Clinton and the dems last election.

Given the raids going on on Manafort and Cohen it certainly looks like those two are going down to add to the talley of convictions. And the dems really aren't using it for their campaigns but its coming.

I have no idea whether or not the investigation is going to go all the way up to impeaching/indicting Trump but what I do know is that a damning investigation scandal is earthmoving in terms of elections. Have fun playing the ignorant merchant of doubt though.

hater
04-10-2018, 10:53 AM
:lol impressed with circle jerks at any age

:lmao

AaronY
04-11-2018, 10:01 AM
You seem to fail to grasp how the Russia investigation is going to play with the next two elections. Given how the house and senate GOP have been carrying on playing interference for the WH the linkage is extremely clear. They vote for him as a bloc 95% of the time.

The investigation is going to be playing through the upcoming November election swaying independents and motivating the liberal base. It's infinitely better than Benghazi and the emails and those absolutely eviscerated Clinton and the dems last election.

Given the raids going on on Manafort and Cohen it certainly looks like those two are going down to add to the talley of convictions. And the dems really aren't using it for their campaigns but its coming.

I have no idea whether or not the investigation is going to go all the way up to impeaching/indicting Trump but what I do know is that a damning investigation scandal is earthmoving in terms of elections. Have fun playing the ignorant merchant of doubt though.
Ok. Will do

RandomGuy
04-11-2018, 05:16 PM
Nah, he got dickslapped

How exactly?

Sounds more like butthurt cheerleading on your part, tbh.

Do tell.

AaronY
04-11-2018, 06:39 PM
Yes I'm butthurt from that one time we uh, I dunno something

FuzzyLumpkins
04-12-2018, 10:23 AM
Yes I'm butthurt from that one time we uh, I dunno something

You can posture all you like but you pretty much do this troll cheerleader routine with this account in every thread he starts. ACtions words that whole thing. You obviously have a hard on for RG.

RandomGuy
04-12-2018, 11:33 AM
How exactly [did I get dickslapped by one of the least competent people that post here]?

Sounds more like butthurt cheerleading on your part, tbh.

Do tell.


Yes I'm butthurt from that one time we uh, I dunno something

So, you have nothing. Butthurt. Cheerleader.

Understood. :tu

AaronY
04-12-2018, 05:28 PM
Lmao.