Nate Silver: Hillary's Crimes Cost Her The Election

[Spurtacular]

I agree, Nate.

924248138973462528

[rmt]

The truth is that Hillary brought it all down on herself by setting up a private server in the first place. Americans might be ignorant but they still have common sense and common sense says why would a government official set up a private server if not to have control of what is on it and the ability to get rid of that information - completely covering her tracks. LOL at Nate Silver trying to explain away fivethirtyeight's misread of the polls - blaming the media - like the media didn't also cover/saturate the waves with every single negative thing/word of Trump's. Oh, but they should have laid off Comey's letter.

[baseline bum]

The truth is that Hillary brought it all down on herself by setting up a private server in the first place. Americans might be ignorant but they still have common sense and common sense says why would a government official set up a private server if not to have control of what is on it and the ability to get rid of that information - completely covering her tracks. LOL at Nate Silver trying to explain away fivethirtyeight's misread of the polls - blaming the media - like the media didn't also cover/saturate the waves with every single negative thing/word of Trump's. Oh, but they should have laid off Comey's letter.

Why do Trumptards always pretend Silver didn't write for months about how close the election was and how the slightest polling error or bump in Trump's direction would doom Clinton's campaign?

[Spurtacular]

Why do Trumptards always pretend Silver didn't write for months about how close the election was and how the slightest polling error or bump in Trump's direction would doom Clinton's campaign?

You're full of shit.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgLe1fWJBi0

[baseline bum]

You're full of shit.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgLe1fWJBi0

He wrote about it for months. LOL cherry picking the one time Trump took a huge nosedive for a few days after the Access Hollywood tape and a terrible debate performance when the GOP was openly talking about having him drop out.

[Pavlov]

I agree, Nate.

924248138973462528What is she charged with?

[DMX7]

lol, her "crimes". The FBI CLEARED her after an intensive investigation, moron.

[boutons_deux]

moron? stop with the PC euphemisms

[rmt]

Why do Trumptards always pretend Silver didn't write for months about how close the election was and how the slightest polling error or bump in Trump's direction would doom Clinton's campaign?

So why is he NOW blaming the media for not laying off Comey's letter? Why shouldn't they report the head of the FBI's letter - that's big news. It's as if he's blaming the media for doing their job as he is for Comey writing the letter. And both PA and MI have no early voting so by the time they voted, they already knew there was nothing found.

[rmt]

So why is he NOW blaming the media for not laying off Comey's letter? Why shouldn't they report the head of the FBI's letter - that's big news. It's as if he's blaming the media for doing their job as much as he is for Comey writing the letter. And both PA and MI have no early voting so by the time they voted, they already knew there was nothing found.

[boutons_deux]

Comey severely trashed Hillary on much-hyped NATIONAL TV a few months earlier, violating FBI protocol that says if an investigation returns no indictment, then silence.

Then Comey fatally trashed her again about the finding DUPLICATES of emails already seen, 10 days before the election, a trashing that caused, as Silver reported, significant shifts away from Hillary in PA, MI, WI, precisely the 3 states whose EVs gave Trash the WH by the smallest EV margin in 60 years.

But, for over ONE FUCKING YEAR, FBI had been SILENTLY, SECRETLY (per FBI protocol) investigating Trash and his people's connections to Pootin.

FBI announced it had been investigating Hillary's emails under Repug pressure to find something (but finding nothing), while simultaneously investigating Trash in secret (and now very probably finding Trash to be compromised by adversary Pootin if not a formal traitor).

[Pavlov]

So why is he NOW blaming the media for not laying off Comey's letter? Why shouldn't they report the head of the FBI's letter - that's big news. It's as if he's blaming the media for doing their job as he is for Comey writing the letter. And both PA and MI have no early voting so by the time they voted, they already knew there was nothing found.Comey only released it because some Republican was going to leak it anyway.

And it turned out to be a nothingburger.

[boutons_deux]

Comey only released it because some Republican was going to leak it anyway.

And it turned out to be a nothingburger.

I read Comey knew there were FBI misogynists in the NY office who hated Hillary and were going to leak the Huma machine emails.

[Pavlov]

I read Comey knew there were FBI misogynists in the NY office who hated Hillary and were going to leak the Huma machine emails.Could be why he sent the letter when he did. I think I misrepresented -- Comey sent the letter then some House Republican released it to the press.

[Spurtacular]

He wrote about it for months. LOL cherry picking the one time Trump took a huge nosedive for a few days after the Access Hollywood tape and a terrible debate performance when the GOP was openly talking about having him drop out.

Three weeks before the election he was quite clear that this thing was in the bag for Hillary, dude. He even said Hillary was up 10 going into the debates and called the debates that Trump won a pick six for Hillary. Does that sound "close" to you?

[Spurtacular]

Comey severely trashed Hillary on much-hyped NATIONAL TV a few months earlier, violating FBI protocol that says if an investigation returns no indictment, then silence.


:lmao "Protocol"

If you're going to run for the highest office in the land, you're subject to scrutiny. Fuck, you're a PC euphemism.

[baseline bum]

Three weeks before the election he was quite clear that this thing was in the bag for Hillary, dude. He even said Hillary was up 10 going into the debates and called the debates that Trump won a pick six for Hillary. Does that sound "close" to you?

:lol

Trump didn't win any debates

[Pavlov]

What crimes, again?

[Spurtacular]

:lol

Trump didn't win any debates

Instant poll after instant poll showed Trump slaughtering Hillary, even on the libtard media sites. The next day, the media put out their made-up polls. That was no surprise. But this is a side point to the fact that Nate was not calling this "close." You can't watch that video and tell me that Nate is calling it "close." You got called out for being full of shit, bro. Proper.

[Spurtacular]

What crimes, again?

Crimes "happened," bro.

Only the cucks like you are pretending that isn't the case. :lmao

[AaronY]

Why do Trumptards always pretend Silver didn't write for months about how close the election was and how the slightest polling error or bump in Trump's direction would doom Clinton's campaign?
He's not a Trump fanatic. To these cultists anyone not gargling Trump's balls is hopelessly biased somehow. Brainwashed by the MSM

[Spurminator]

Crimes "happened," bro.

Only the cucks like you are pretending that isn't the case. :lmao

Do you think anyone falls for this? No one believes this kind of non-answer wins an argument.

[baseline bum]

Instant poll after instant poll showed Trump slaughtering Hillary, even on the libtard media sites. The next day, the media put out their made-up polls. That was no surprise. But this is a side point to the fact that Nate was not calling this "close." You can't watch that video and tell me that Nate is calling it "close." You got called out for being full of shit, bro. Proper.

:lmao internet polls that got spammed by Trumptards
:lmao one video overriding months of Silver's articles about how fragile Clinton's lead was
:lmao Jimmer

[Pavlov]

Crimes "happened," bro.

Only the cucks like you are pretending that isn't the case. :lmaoYou didn't answer the question.

What crimes, again?

[Spurtacular]

Do you think anyone falls for this? No one believes this kind of non-answer wins an argument.

There is no debate. It takes a moron, slurper, or both to pretend that Hillary hasn't committed crimes.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao internet polls that got spammed by Trumptards
:lmao one video overriding months of Silver's articles about how fragile Clinton's lead was
:lmao Jimmer

Three weeks before the election, Silver appearing on national TV to say that Hillary had all but won the election. Can you point to anything in that video that is contrary to my recap?

[Spurminator]

There is no debate. It takes a moron, slurper, or both to pretend that Hillary hasn't committed crimes.

If that's the case it should be super easy to specify the crimes you're talking about. Only a moron would have trouble naming things that are so obvious to everyone else.

But seriously, who wastes their time like this?

[Clipper Nation]

Why do Trumptards always pretend Silver didn't write for months about how close the election was and how the slightest polling error or bump in Trump's direction would doom Clinton's campaign?

Why do Silver's slurpers always gloss over how wrong he was during the entire primary process? I remember Silver insisting at one point that Trump had a better chance of playing in the NBA Finals than winning the GOP nomination.

[Clipper Nation]

"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"

http://i.imgur.com/nzPEnbd.jpg

[Spurtacular]

If that's the case it should be super easy to specify the crimes you're talking about. Only a moron would have trouble naming things that are so obvious to everyone else.

But seriously, who wastes their time like this?

Why would I want to itemize a litany of crimes for someone who is in denial? You've been around the block, dude. Why are you still in denial?

[AaronY]

"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"

http://i.imgur.com/nzPEnbd.jpg

Yeesh that is pretty embarrassing for Silver tbh

[Spurtacular]

"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"

http://i.imgur.com/nzPEnbd.jpg


:lmao
baseline bum

[AaronY]

The fact that ducks is the only one I directly know who nailed Trump winning the primaries and general is pretty hilarious

[Spurminator]

Why would I want to itemize a litany of crimes for someone who is in denial? You've been around the block, dude. Why are you still in denial?

You don't have to itemize anything, you just have to name one thing.

[AaronY]

:lmao
baseline bum (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=131)
Lol moving the goal posts he was still right about your shit

[Pavlov]

Why would I want to itemize a litany of crimes for someone who is in denial? You've been around the block, dude. Why are you still in denial?:lol

You can't name any.

[Spurtacular]

You don't have to itemize anything, you just have to name one thing.

For what reason? To feed your psychosis?

Anyone paying attention must come to one of two conclusions:

1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.

In which camp do you fall?

[AaronY]

deleting emails w/o a permit I think

[Spurtacular]

deleting emails w/o a permit I think

Are you saying that the deleting of the e-mails was not criminal?

[Pavlov]

For what reason? To feed your psychosis?

Anyone paying attention must come to one of two conclusions:

1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.

In which camp do you fall?:lol you can't name any crimes

[Spurtacular]

Lol moving the goal posts he was still right about your shit

"Silver (wrote) for months about how close the election..." Those are his "goalposts". Feel free to present the supporting evidence.

[Spurtacular]

you can't name any crimes

Pick your number, bro. I don't think you have the scrotum to promptly do it.

1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.

[Pavlov]

Pick your number, bro. I don't think you have the scrotum to promptly do it.

1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.:lol you can't name any crimes.

[Spurminator]

For what reason? To feed your psychosis?

To establish yourself as anything more than an uninteresting shitposter.


Anyone paying attention must come to one of two conclusions:

1. Hillary is the figurehead of a criminal conglomerate.
2. Hillary knowingly associates with hardcore criminals to her great advantage.

In which camp do you fall?

Still failing.

[Spurtacular]

To establish yourself as anything more than an uninteresting shitposter.



Still failing.

So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?

[Spurminator]

So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?

I don't think that was your claim. That's a pretty pathetic attempt at naming her obvious criminal history.

[Pavlov]

So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?
Which hardcore criminals?


Which crimes?

[Spurtacular]

Which hardcore criminals?

Which crimes?

So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?

[Pavlov]

So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?
Which hardcore criminals?

What crimes?

[Spurtacular]

I don't think that was your claim. That's a pretty pathetic attempt at naming her obvious criminal history.

Okay; but I'm not trying to sell a denier like you on my claim. We're nailing down your level of denial as to show you why it would be pointless for me to list the litany of Hillary's crimes. If you can't even concede that she associates with criminals, then you're that far gone.

[Spurminator]

There is no debate. It takes a moron, slurper, or both to pretend that Hillary hasn't committed crimes.


So, you don't think that at a minimum Hillary associates with hardcore criminals?

https://media.giphy.com/media/z4LDUcCI2J7BS/giphy.gifhttps://giphy.com/embed/z4LDUcCI2J7BShttp://worldseriesdreaming.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/1slj61.gif

[Spurminator]

Okay; but I'm not trying to sell a denier like you on my claim. We're nailing down your level of denial as to show you why it would be pointless for me to list the litany of Hillary's crimes. If you can't even concede that she associates with criminals, then you're that far gone.

I'm not denying anything, I'm just asking you to specify one crime.

[Spurtacular]

I'm not denying anything, I'm just asking you to specify one crime.

You're implicitly denying Hillary's advantages through criminal enterprises.

[Pavlov]

You're implicitly denying Hillary's advantages through criminal enterprises.

Which criminal enterprises?

Which hardcore criminals?

What crimes?

[Spurminator]

You're implicitly denying Hillary's advantages through criminal enterprises.

We haven't started talking about associates. We can have that discussion after you name a crime.

[Spurtacular]

We haven't started talking about associates. We can have that discussion after you name a crime.

For what purpose? You're not going to change your denial tactics. Can you point to any posts on this forum in which you've ceded Hillary's incredibly bad behavior?

[AaronY]

For what purpose? You're not going to change your denial tactics. Can you point to any posts on this forum in which you've ceded Hillary's incredibly bad behavior?
Do you not know you're a retard? is that the problem?

[Spurminator]

For what purpose? You're not going to change your denial tactics. Can you point to any posts on this forum in which you've ceded Hillary's incredibly bad behavior?

This isn't about me, it's your failed thread.

[Spurtacular]

Which criminal enterprises?

Which hardcore criminals?

What crimes?


Do you not know you're a retard? is that the problem?


This isn't about me, it's your failed thread.

This thread presupposes you're not a total tool and still in denial about Hillary's criminal proclivities. Sorry, losers.

[Spurminator]

This thread presupposes you're not a total tool and still in denial about Hillary's criminal proclivities. Sorry, losers.

You have spent an hour dancing for our amusement by predictably failing to specify the crimes alleged in your thread title, instead of one easy post that would own us all completely and salvage your claim and your reputation. You've chosen the former because you're either a masochist who craves embarrassment, or you're just full of shit. Thanks either way.

[Spurtacular]

You have spent an hour dancing for our amusement by predictably failing to specify the crimes alleged in your thread title, instead of one easy post that would own us all completely and salvage your claim and your reputation. You've chosen the former because you're either a masochist who craves embarrassment, or you're just full of shit. Thanks either way.

This thread presupposes you're not a total tool and still in denial about Hillary's criminal proclivities.

[Pavlov]

This thread presupposes you're not a total tool and still in denial about Hillary's criminal proclivities. Sorry, losers.All you have to do is answer the questions.

What crimes?

Which hardcore criminals?

Which criminal enterprises?

[Spurminator]

This thread presupposes you're not a total tool and still in denial about Hillary's criminal proclivities.

My participation in this thread presupposes you don't know what you're talking about, and your continued participation proves it.

By the way, did you ever read up on William F. Buckley?

[Pavlov]

By the way, did you ever read up on William F. Buckley?Of course not. Can't even spoon feed this baby.

[DMC]

The truth is that Hillary brought it all down on herself by setting up a private server in the first place. Americans might be ignorant but they still have common sense and common sense says why would a government official set up a private server if not to have control of what is on it and the ability to get rid of that information - completely covering her tracks. LOL at Nate Silver trying to explain away fivethirtyeight's misread of the polls - blaming the media - like the media didn't also cover/saturate the waves with every single negative thing/word of Trump's. Oh, but they should have laid off Comey's letter.

It goes beyond that. You have two parties that will behead each other in public if need be to secure power for themselves. The Clintons built an empire but Hillary wasn't really up to running it. She was shoe horned into that role via the Obama administration's gift position to her for being Bill's wife. Very few can shine like Bill did in the intense heat of the media spotlight for 8 years. Hillary is no Bill.

[Spurtacular]

My participation in this thread presupposes you don't know what you're talking about, and your continued participation proves it.

Actually, your participation is based upon standard denial of the obvious; hence, why I'm not playing your gay game.


By the way, did you ever read up on William F. Buckley?

I regarded this matter in the thread. Unsurprisingly, you didn't get that. A conservative advocate is not an "objective" media pundit, moron.

[Pavlov]

I regarded this matter in the thread. Unsurprisingly, you didn't get that. A conservative advocate is not an "objective" media pundit, moron.Wait, who do you consider an objective media pundit?

[Spurminator]

Actually, your participation is based upon standard denial of the obvious; hence, why I'm not playing your gay game.
You keep telling yourself that and thinking anyone is convinced.


I regarded this matter in the thread. Unsurprisingly, you didn't get that. A conservative advocate is not an "objective" media pundit, moron.

You didn't say anything about Buckley in that thread, you made this nonsensical claim to differentiate Rush Limbaugh from Bill O'Reilly, as though either of them is objective.

[baseline bum]

"Silver was always right about Trump, guys! He called it!"

http://i.imgur.com/nzPEnbd.jpg


He was dead wrong in the primaries but he was the only one showing why Trump had a real chance by the time the general rolled around.

[Spurtacular]

It goes beyond that. You have two parties that will behead each other in public if need be to secure power for themselves. The Clintons built an empire but Hillary wasn't really up to running it. She was shoe horned into that role via the Obama administration's gift position to her for being Bill's wife. Very few can shine like Bill did in the intense heat of the media spotlight for 8 years. Hillary is no Bill.

I've heard this contrast before. I'm not sure how valid it is or how applicable it is. Did Hillary have more baggage than Bill? Arguably no. Hillary was the same game that had not worked for the last eight years; also, Bill didn't have to compete with social media. He had the corporate media running full interference.

Also, side point: I doubt Obama "gifted" Hillary anything. She stepped out in 2008 / Didn't run in 2012 with the understanding that 2016 was her year. It's probably why Biden didn't run.

[Spurtacular]

He was dead wrong in the primaries but he was the only one showing why Trump had a real chance by the time the general rolled around.

IIRC, even after the Comey letter, 538 had Hillary's odds of winning at 78 percent. I wouldn't really say that's all that "close" even then. But we're regarding the time before the Comey letter. I think that video is fairly representative of what 538 was presenting; and in fact, you still haven't been able to point to anything in that video that put the race as "close".

[baseline bum]

I think that video is fairly representative of what 538 was presenting

Silver wrote a lot about the Clinton firewall in the midwest being fragile and something that could collapse under a small margin of error in the polls. He wrote about how the media didn't understand probability and that those states weren't the long string of coin flips the idiots at CNN treated it like. And 78% odds is hardly calling the election for Clinton (it was more like 70% on that dark morning of 11-9).

[DMC]

I've heard this contrast before. I'm not sure how valid it is or how applicable it is. Did Hillary have more baggage than Bill? Arguably no. Hillary was the same game that had not worked for the last eight years; also, Bill didn't have to compete with social media. He had the corporate media running full interference.

Also, side point: I doubt Obama "gifted" Hillary anything. She stepped out in 2008 / Didn't run in 2012 with the understanding that 2016 was her year. It's probably why Biden didn't run.

Hillary can't talk for shit. Bill got multiple blowjobs in the oval office, stuck a cigar up Monica's pussy and still Hillary believed him when he said "I did not have sex with that woman". Hillary can say "I had eggs for breakfast" and everyone thinks she's lying.

[AaronY]

Hillary can't talk for shit. Bill got multiple blowjobs in the oval office, stuck a cigar up Monica's pussy and still Hillary believed him when he said "I did not have sex with that woman". Hillary can say "I had eggs for breakfast" and everyone thinks she's lying.
This is the honest to goodness truth. Hillary is just a fucking boring speaker. Trump, Bill, and others have shown if you're either charismatic or able in Trump's case to hold people's attention for other reasons ("what will he say next?!?!") a lot of your transgressions don't even matter. No one talks about how boring Hillary was

[Spurtacular]

Silver wrote a lot about the Clinton firewall in the midwest being fragile and something that could collapse under a small margin of error in the polls. He wrote about how the media didn't understand probability and that those states weren't the long string of coin flips the idiots at CNN treated it like. And 78% odds is hardly calling the election for Clinton (it was more like 70% on that dark morning of 11-9).

78 percent even after the Comey letter. Before that, Nate had it in the 90's for Clinton. Sure, Nate covered some contingencies and even noted the significant possibility of a real battle in the day or so before the election. But the point still would be that he was not calling this election close after the debates and before the Comey letter. He is obviously therefore pretty definitively blaming the loss on the Comey letter. In fact, that's basically the title of his article.

[Spurtacular]

Hillary can't talk for shit. Bill got multiple blowjobs in the oval office, stuck a cigar up Monica's pussy and still Hillary believed him when he said "I did not have sex with that woman". Hillary can say "I had eggs for breakfast" and everyone thinks she's lying.

Hillary didn't believe Bill, dude. She had ran cover-up for him for years. And people weren't exactly believing Bill either. And Hillary is literally a sociopath; if she says she had eggs for breakfast, there's a significant chance she is lying, regardless.

[Pavlov]

:lol still can't name a single crime.

[baseline bum]

78 percent even after the Comey letter. Before that, Nate had it in the 90's for Clinton. Sure, Nate covered some contingencies and even noted the significant possibility of a real battle in the day or so before the election. But the point still would be that he was not calling this election close after the debates and before the Comey letter. He is obviously therefore pretty definitively blaming the loss on the Comey letter. In fact, that's basically the title of his article.

Whatever you want to believe

[Spurtacular]

This is the honest to goodness truth. Hillary is just a fucking boring speaker. Trump, Bill, and others have shown if you're either charismatic or able in Trump's case to hold people's attention for other reasons ("what will he say next?!?!") a lot of your transgressions don't even matter. No one talks about how boring Hillary was

"Most qualified." "Most experienced." "Make History." Etc. Hillary was sold as the preeminent choice. At no point did she make it about anything substantive like jobs (unless you count "putting a whole lot of coal miners out of work.")


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtJq3H1dlnk

I really didn't think it would matter, tbh. Obama's 2012 campaign was even worse but he had managed to steal every swing state other than NC. To me, that will always be something that makes me wonder exactly what happened there; I went into it expecting the fix to be in.

[Spurtacular]

Whatever you want to believe

You've not made one single point to show that it was "close" before the Comey letter, according to Nate Silver.

[baseline bum]

You've not made one single point to show that it was "close" before the Comey letter, according to Nate Silver.

Whatever you want to believe

[Spurtacular]

Whatever you want to believe

Have you? Did I miss something? I think you mean it is what you want to believe.

[baseline bum]

Have you? Did I miss something? I think you mean it is what you want to believe.

Whatever you want to believe

[Pavlov]

I mean we're talking zero crimes named here.

[Spurtacular]

Whatever you want to believe

Okay. I believe that Nate Silver had all but called the election for Hillary in the interim between the debates and the Comey letter. To paraphrase, she was up 10 going into the debates, and Trump threw a pick six. I guess if you're calling 17 point spreads of football metaphors "close," then it's what you believe.

[Pavlov]

:lol how can a person try to bury the lede when it's in his headline?

[DMC]

This is the honest to goodness truth. Hillary is just a fucking boring speaker. Trump, Bill, and others have shown if you're either charismatic or able in Trump's case to hold people's attention for other reasons ("what will he say next?!?!") a lot of your transgressions don't even matter. No one talks about how boring Hillary was

Bill and Barack were really good at knowing what to say, just not any better than anyone else at knowing what to do. Those who know what to do often don't know what to say, so the twain shall rarely meet in one body.

[Spurtacular]

:lol how can a person try to bury the lede when it's in his headline?

The lead is Nate Silver blaming Hillary's election loss on Comey's letter. If you need convincing of Hillary's criminal endeavors at this point, then that just speaks to your own idiocy.

[Pavlov]

The lead is Nate Silver blaming Hillary's election loss on Comey's letter. If you need convincing of Hillary's criminal endeavors at this point, then that just speaks to your own idiocy.which criminal enxevors?

Name one.

[boutons_deux]

Hillaryˋs crimes :lol

You rightwingnutjob assholes get led around by your pubes with fabricated shit from the Repugs and hate media.

[Spurtacular]

HillaryˋS crimeS :lol


which criminal enxevors?

Name one.

If you need convincing of Hillary's criminal endeavors at this point, then that just speaks to your own idiocy.

[Pavlov]

If you need convincing of Hillary's criminal endeavors at this point, then that just speaks to your own idiocy.
:lmao You can't name even one.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao You can't name even one.

You "can't" because you're an idiot.

[boutons_deux]

Hillary murdered Vince Foster and lots of others

[SnakeBoy]

He was dead wrong in the primaries but he was the only one showing why Trump had a real chance by the time the general rolled around.

He was giving Hillary a 93% like 8 weeks before election day. On election day he was giving Trump a 28% chance of winning.

He's just like all the pollsters that make multiple predictions and/or make the race close just before election day so they can claim they were right or close no matter what happens. Pretty much everyone (even Ducks) thought Hillary was going to win so it's no big deal he was wrong. I just don't understand why you always suck Nate Silver's dick like he's something special.

[baseline bum]

He was giving Hillary a 93% like 8 weeks before election day. On election day he was giving Trump a 28% chance of winning.

He's just like all the pollsters that make multiple predictions and/or make the race close just before election day so they can claim they were right or close no matter what happens. Pretty much everyone (even Ducks) thought Hillary was going to win so it's no big deal he was wrong. I just don't understand why you always suck Nate Silver's dick like he's something special.

So you're saying all the pollsters were saying Trump had a real shot to win?

[Spurtacular]

So you're saying all the pollsters were saying Trump had a real shot to win?

They consistently said that. NYT had Hillary at 93 percent on election day. I guess if you want to call 7 percent "a real shot to win."

[spurraider21]

You "can't" because you're an idiot.
What does that say for you since you can't name one either :lol

[Spurtacular]

What does that say for you since you can't name one either :lol

Go back and review the thread, and then if you still need to make that assertion, then you're an idiot, too.

[rmt]

Just goes to show what charm and personality can get you (Bill vs Hillary). IMO, she knew what was going on - how can a smart, intelligent woman who's known him for x years not know - she covered up for Chelsea (because no matter what faithless, scum-bag he is, he's still her daughter's "daddy" and for her own personal ambition - getting into the White House on his coattails or her own future political goals.

[Spurtacular]

Just goes to show what charm and personality can get you (Bill vs Hillary). IMO, she knew what was going on - how can a smart, intelligent woman who's known him for x years not know - she covered up for Chelsea (because no matter what faithless, scum-bag he is, he's still her daughter's "daddy" and for her own personal ambition - getting into the White House on his coattails or her own future political goals.

Chelsea has known about the Clinton's corruption since elementary school, and she frankly embraced it. There was no covering up for her as you put it. They groomed her in their ways.

[Pavlov]

:lol not a single crime.

[florige]

:lol not a single crime.



Right! I was sure this would be the day Hillary and Obama would be charged with treason.

[LaMarcus Bryant]

Three weeks before the election he was quite clear that this thing was in the bag for Hillary, dude. He even said Hillary was up 10 going into the debates and called the debates that Trump won a pick six for Hillary. Does that sound "close" to you?

No he didn't. He said she had like a 55% chance to win.

[rmt]

Chelsea has known about the Clinton's corruption since elementary school, and she frankly embraced it. There was no covering up for her as you put it. They groomed her in their ways.

I don't mean their business dealings. I meant Bill's cheating, affairs, etc - I think she knew all along but wanted to preserve the family unit.

[spurraider21]

So spurtacular says only idiots can't see clintons crimes and at the same time he can't identify any of clintons crimes

[Spurtacular]

No he didn't. He said she had like a 55% chance to win.

:lmao Link it then, bitch.

[Spurtacular]

I don't mean their business dealings. I meant Bill's cheating, affairs, etc - I think she knew all along but wanted to preserve the family unit.

She was in a den of vipers all the same and treated others as lesser-thans due to her station. Her parents taught her to put on a good face for the cameras.

[clambake]

She was in a den of vipers all the same and treated others as lesser-thans due to her station. Her parents taught her to put on a good face for the cameras.

damn straight


good thing she's history.

[Spurtacular]

damn straight


good thing she's history.

She'll win a spot in Congress if she goes for it; she should be taken down before it comes to that; prosecuted for her corruption at The Clinton Foundation.

[Pavlov]

Which crimes?

[spurraider21]

Which crimes?
Only an idiot like spurtacular wouldn't be able to name her crimes

[Spurtacular]

Only an idiot like spurtacular wouldn't be able to name her crimes

And how idiotic are you? Name her crimes.

[Pavlov]

And how idiotic are you? Name her crimes.:lmao Now you're asking him for help.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Now you're asking him for help.

And how idiotic are you? Name her crimes.

[Pavlov]

And how idiotic are you? Name her crimes.
:lmao now you're asking me for help.

[Pavlov]

You're the one who claimed she committed crimes. Not us.

[Spurtacular]

You're the one who claimed she committed crimes. Not us.

I asserted a well-known fact. If you follow politics daily and still can't cite Clinton's crimes, then obviously you don't have a leg to stand on.

[Pavlov]

I asserted a well-known fact. If you follow politics daily and still can't cite Clinton's crimes, then obviously you don't have a leg to stand on.
OK, cite Hillary Clinton's crimes. We've been asking you to do this.

[Spurtacular]

OK, cite Hillary Clinton's crimes. We've been asking you to do this.

Yea, cite them. If you can't after following politics for this many years, then you're a laughing stock. Go for it.

[Pavlov]

Yea, cite them. If you can't after following politics for this many years, then you're a laughing stock. Go for it.https://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTncUFYwu2PpAFjO/giphy-downsized-large.gif

[Spurtacular]

https://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTncUFYwu2PpAFjO/giphy-downsized-large.gif

You shouldn't be talking about how anything works if you can't even cite one Clinton crime.

[Pavlov]

You shouldn't be talking about how anything works if you can't even cite one Clinton crime.You can't even cite one Hillary Clinton crime in your thread about Hilary Clinton's crimes.

[Spurtacular]

You can't even cite one Hillary Clinton crime in your thread about Hilary Clinton's crimes.

You can't cite one crime by Hillary after following her for years.

#LaughingStock

[spurraider21]

You can't cite one crime by Hillary after following her for years.

#LaughingStock
Probably since she's never been arrested, indicted, or convicted of any.

[Pavlov]

Nate Silver: Hillary's Crimes Cost Her The Election

What crimes, again?

https://i.imgur.com/C5Axltg.gif

[benefactor]

Strange thread tbh

[Spurtacular]

Probably since she's never been arrested, indicted, or convicted of any.

So, you want to presuppose the infallibility of the legal system? And still yet, you want to presuppose that non-indictment equals innocence?

#Naive
#Fool
#Lightweight

[Pavlov]

So, you want to presuppose the infallibility of the legal system? And still yet, you want to presuppose that non-indictment equals innocence?

#Naive
#Fool
#LightweightSo what Hillary crimes are you talking about?

[spurraider21]

So, you want to presuppose the infallibility of the legal system? And still yet, you want to presuppose that non-indictment equals innocence?

#Naive
#Fool
#Lightweight
I mean that would certainly be the first place I'd look.

You claim to have a greater knowledge of all the crimes she's committed but have refused to disclose even one crime. Strange.

[Spurtacular]

So what Hillary crimes are you talking about?

I haven't been talking about her litany of crimes. Can you name one, or are you a laughing stock?

[Pavlov]

I haven't been talking about her litany of crimes. You made a thread about them.

Name them.

[Spurtacular]

I mean that would certainly be the first place I'd look.

You claim to have a greater knowledge of all the crimes she's committed but have refused to disclose even one crime. Strange.

Actually, I claim it's obvious to anyone who follows current affairs that Hillary is a career criminal. I don't claim any exclusive knowledge. Anyone claiming she operates on the level is a laughing stock.

[Pavlov]

Actually, I claim it's obvious to anyone who follows current affairs that Hillary is a career criminal. I don't claim any exclusive knowledge. Anyone claiming she operates on the level is a laughing stock.So name dem crimes.

[unleashbaynes]

Trump supporters sure are desparate. And why? He is such a worthless human. Just stop.

[Spurtacular]

So name dem crimes.

I'm sorry; I can't hear you over the laughing.

[spurraider21]

Actually, I claim it's obvious to anyone who follows current affairs that Hillary is a career criminal. I don't claim any exclusive knowledge. Anyone claiming she operates on the level is a laughing stock.
Right. Anybody who doesn't see she's a criminal is a laughing stock. And seeing as how you can't name one crime she's committed, you clearly don't think she's a criminal (because typically criminals have committed crimes). That makes you a laughing stock. Good job

[Pavlov]

I'm sorry; I can't hear you over the laughing.Yea, cite them. If you can't after following politics for this many years, then you're a laughing stock. Go for it.

[benefactor]

I'm curious about these crimes. I don't follow politics as closely as some folks do. More casually tbh. OP, can you tell me about these crimes?

[Spurtacular]

Right. Anybody who doesn't see she's a criminal is a laughing stock. And seeing as how you can't name one crime she's committed, you clearly don't think she's a criminal (because typically criminals have committed crimes). That makes you a laughing stock. Good job

Can't? No, I just won't be catering to the same ploy that is in every thread. Anyone denying that Hillary is not a criminal is a shmuck. I don't make it a habit of trying to convince shmucks of anything.

[clambake]

I'm curious about these crimes. I don't follow politics as closely as some folks do. More casually tbh. OP, can you tell me about these crimes?
turn on hannity

[Spurtacular]

I'm curious about these crimes. I don't follow politics as closely as some folks do. More casually tbh. OP, can you tell me about these crimes?

Google is out there, should you be inclined to pull your head out of your ass.

[unleashbaynes]

OP could tell you about the crimes, but left-wing Washington covers it up. Yup, it's all one big grand conspiracy against Trump, who is obviously a great person and not a self-serving narcissist at all.

[Pavlov]

Can't? No, I just won't be catering to the same ploy that is in every thread. Anyone denying that Hillary is not a criminal is a shmuck. I don't make it a habit of trying to convince shmucks of anything.You've made a habit of melting down when asked direct questions.

[Pavlov]

Google is out there, should you be inclined to pull your head out of your ass.How about you just name a few to help him out.

[Spurtacular]

OP could tell you about the crimes, but left-wing Washington covers it up. Yup, it's all one big grand conspiracy against Trump, who is obviously a great person and not a self-serving narcissist at all.

Hillary was a criminal long before Trump was a central figure, bro.

[Spurtacular]

How about you just name a few to help him out.

How about you prove you're not a laughing stock and name one of Hillary's crimes.

[benefactor]

Google is out there, should you be inclined to pull your head out of your ass.
But you made a thread about this...I guess I just expected what any reasonable person would expect...to get the information about said thread in the thread. Seems like a reasonable request.

[AaronY]

How about you prove you're not a laughing stock and name one of Hillary's crimes.
what crimes?

[Pavlov]

Hillary was a criminal long before Trump was a central figure, bro.What crimes?


How about you prove you're not a laughing stock and name one of Hillary's crimes.Your thread: Nate Silver: Hillary's Crimes Cost Her The Election.

Name them. Show us all up. Perfect opportunity.

[Spurtacular]

But you made a thread about this...I guess I just expected what any reasonable person would expect...to get the information about said thread in the thread. Seems like a reasonable request.

The thread is not about reviewing Hillary's litany of crimes. Nice try. I certainly knew that wording it how I did would trigger snowflakes like you if that means anything to you.

[AaronY]

The thread is not about reviewing Hillary's litany of crimes.

What crimes?

[clambake]

friggin snowflakes

[Spurtacular]

What crimes?

Your thread: Nate Silver: Hillary's Crimes Cost Her The Election.

Name them. Show us all up. Perfect opportunity.

You done being a laughing stock?

[Pavlov]

The thread is not about reviewing Hillary's litany of crimes. Nice try. I certainly knew that wording it how I did would trigger snowflakes like you if that means anything to you.By your own definition, your complete failure to name Hillary's crimes brands you a laughing stock.

:lol

[Pavlov]

You done being a laughing stock?


By your own definition, your complete failure to name Hillary's crimes brands you a laughing stock.

:lol

[spurraider21]

Spurtacular covering up for Hillary's crimes more than CNN is pretty entertaining though.

[Spurtacular]

How about you just name a few to help him out.

How about you show you're not a laughing stock, and maybe I can take you seriously.

[Pavlov]

Spurtacular covering up for Hillary's crimes more than CNN is pretty entertaining though.He's paid by Soros tbh.

[Spurtacular]

By your own definition, your complete failure to name Hillary's crimes brands you a laughing stock.

:lol

It would if "can't" applied as it does in your case.

[Pavlov]

How about you show you're not a laughing stock, and maybe I can take you seriously.


By your own definition, your complete failure to name Hillary's crimes brands you a laughing stock.

:lol:lol

[clambake]

hannity about to fill spurtaculer cupboard of hillary crimes

[Pavlov]

It would if "can't" applied as it does in your case.You can't. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Spurtacular covering up for Hillary's crimes more than CNN is pretty entertaining though.

What crimes? Name one.

[unleashbaynes]

Hillary was a criminal long before Trump was a central figure, bro.

What crimes did she commit, OP of a thread about Hillary committing crimes?

[Spurtacular]

You can't. :lol

Cheap come-ons will never work. I keep telling you that. You ready to stop being a laughing stock?

[Pavlov]

What crimes? Name one.You can't name any.

[Pavlov]

Cheap come-ons will never work. I keep telling you that. You ready to stop being a laughing stock?You can't name any.

[Reck]

Cheap come-ons will never work. I keep telling you that. You ready to stop being a laughing stock?

Lashing out, coming out. :lol Spurfaggular.

[Spurtacular]

What crimes did she commit, OP of a thread about Hillary committing crimes?

It's really about the Nate Silver call. All you Hillary shills want to make it about defending your criminal, though. :lmao

[Quadzilla99]

:rollin

[Pavlov]

It's really about the Nate Silver call. All you Hillary shills want to make it about defending your criminal, though. :lmaoIt's your thread title and you can't name even one crime. :lmao

[AaronY]

Anybody ever see that really old abbot and costello routine with the who's on first?

[Pavlov]

Anybody ever see that really abbot and costello routine with the who's on first?Is that the one where Bud says "Who's on first?" and Lou screams "No, you're crying!" and runs away?

[unleashbaynes]

It's really about the Nate Silver call. All you Hillary shills want to make it about defending your criminal, though. :lmao

See that's what's funny. All of a sudden when i ask for proof or evidence of your claim, i'm a "hillary shill" instead of a normal person with healthy skepticism of wild claims.

[benefactor]

Anybody ever see that really old abbot and costello routine with the who's on first?
:lol

[Spurtacular]

See that's what's funny. All of a sudden when i ask for proof or evidence of your claim, i'm a "hillary shill" instead of a normal person with healthy skepticism of wild claims.

Your body of posting screams shill. I know you'd love to pretend it's about this thread in a vacuum; because you're pretty-well hacky like that.

BTW, "healthy skepticism" :lmao

[benefactor]

I think I'll go upstairs and post a thread about how I know Tony Parker's career is over and tell people to figure out why on their own tbh

[Spurtacular]

I think I'll go upstairs and post a thread about how I know Tony Parker's career is over and tell people to figure out why on their own tbh

At the end of the day, people know what there is to know about Tony Parker; just like people know what there is to know about Hillary Clinton. Anyone pretending otherwise is a shill. You won't get people upstairs incessantly crying for you to prove anything. :lmao

[Pavlov]

At the end of the day, people know what there is to know about Tony Parker; just like people know what there is to know about Hillary Clinton. Anyone pretending otherwise is a shill. You won't get people upstairs incessantly crying for you to prove anything. :lmaoWhat crimes tho? Seriously.

[Spurtacular]

^^^ Case in point.

Though tbf, chump does his pest act in any forum.

[Pavlov]

^^^ Case in point.

Though tbf, chump does his pest act in any forum.Yeah, you still can't name any of Hillary's crimes.

[Spurtacular]

Yeah, you still can't name any of Hillary's crimes.

Broken record.

[Pavlov]

Broken record.It's just that your thread says "Hillary's crimes" and you can't name even one. You understand you look pretty foolish trying to dodge this simple question this long in a thread with "Hillary's crimes" in the title, right?

[Spurtacular]

It's just that your thread says "Hillary's crimes" and you can't name even one. You understand you look pretty foolish trying to dodge this simple question this long in a thread with "Hillary's crimes" in the title, right?

I'd say you were triggered, but the reality is you love your games. You should've learned by now that you can't annoy me to answer your questions. I stand firm that anyone who has to be shown how Hillary is a criminal is a hack.

[Pavlov]

I'd say you were triggered, but the reality is you love your games. You should've learned by now that you can't annoy me to answer your questions. I stand firm that anyone who has to be shown how Hillary is a criminal is a hack.I've learned that you could never admit that you just can't name any of what you claim to be Hillary's crimes. It's fun to watch you try and fail to distract from that simple fact.

[DMC]

You can't. :lol


You can't name any.


You can't name any.


What crimes tho? Seriously.


Yeah, you still can't name any of Hillary's crimes.


It's just that your thread says "Hillary's crimes" and you can't name even one. You understand you look pretty foolish trying to dodge this simple question this long in a thread with "Hillary's crimes" in the title, right?


I've learned that you could never admit that you just can't name any of what you claim to be Hillary's crimes. It's fun to watch you try and fail to distract from that simple fact.

Yeah, you're not pathetic at all.

[Pavlov]

Yeah, you're not pathetic at all.Aw, trying to help your little buddy again.

Maybe he'll be impressed by your Starbuck's bomb fantasy.

[Spurtacular]

I've learned that you could never admit that you just can't name any of what you claim to be Hillary's crimes. It's fun to watch you try and fail to distract from that simple fact.

And when did I try and fail? Damn, now you're just arguing your fantasies. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

^^^
187

Sad part is: Par for the course.

[Pavlov]

And when did I try and fail? Damn, now you're just arguing your fantasies. :lmaoWell, right now is one of those times.

What are Hillary's crimes?

[Pavlov]

^^^
187

Sad part is: Par for the course.All you had to do was list Hillary's crimes. I would've stopped long ago.

[Spurtacular]

All you had to do was list Hillary's crimes. I would've stopped long ago.

All's I had to do was give way to your tantrum and you would've stopped? Thanks for that insight. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Well, right now is one of those times.

What are Hillary's crimes?

When did I "try" to list any of Hillary's crimes and "fail." Seriously, list it. It didn't happen. You're just listing your fantasies at this point. :lmao

[Pavlov]

All's I had to do was give way to your tantrum and you would've stopped? Thanks for that insight. :lolOr just admit you never could.


When did I "try" to list any of Hillary's crimes and "fail." Seriously, list it. It didn't happen. You're just listing your fantasies at this point. :lmao


I've learned that you could never admit that you just can't name any of what you claim to be Hillary's crimes. It's fun to watch you try and fail to distract from that simple fact.Reading just isn't your thing, is it? :lol

So what are Hillary's crimes?

[Spurtacular]

Or just admit you never could.



Reading just isn't your thing, is it? :lol

So what are Hillary's crimes?

Reading is certainly not your thing; or you wouldn't be saying I listed a HIllary crime and failed.

[Pavlov]

Reading is certainly not your thing; or you wouldn't be saying I listed a HIllary crime and failed.Did you try to read the post? If so, you failed again.


I've learned that you could never admit that you just can't name any of what you claim to be Hillary's crimes. It's fun to watch you try and fail to distract from that simple fact.You never even tried to list Hillary's crimes -- because you can't list Hillary's crimes.

[benefactor]

At the end of the day, people know what there is to know about Tony Parker; just like people know what there is to know about Hillary Clinton.
I don't know much of anything about Hillary Clinton. I didn't vote for her or Trump...because Trump is a moron and a conman and Clinton is just part of oligarchy. I fact, I barely post on this forum because I'm indifferent towards the government. I only hang out down here now because Trump is easily the most entertaining president ever and I'm enjoying the back and forth about the Russia stuff(and watching ducks sink to new levels of low function). If Clinton would have won I likely would have just stopped paying attention again.

All that said, I haven't seen any news where Clinton was ever charged with anything. I figure that would be pretty important. I've seen some stuff about emails and people mad about some guys that got left in Bengazi or something like that but that's about it. Are these part of the crimes you speak of? Are there others that I don't know about? Serious question.

[RandomGuy]

Broken record.

:lol

Your tap dancing is exactly the same.

No one who is honest is afraid of simple questions, in my experience.

[vy65]

Isn’t this the Jimmer guy?

[baseline bum]

Isn’t this the Jimmer guy?

He's a 9-11 truther too

[spurraider21]

He's a 9-11 truther too
Also a Las Vegas truther (there were no actual bullets)

[vy65]

Really regrettable that SCOTUS outlawed forced sterilization

[Splits]

Isn’t this the Jimmer guy?

:lmao

[Splits]

He's a 9-11 truther too


Also a Las Vegas truther (there were no actual bullets)

Any idea on his Sandy Hook views? Is he Chucho crazy?

[Chucho]

Any idea on his Sandy Hook views? Is he Chucho (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20531) crazy?

LOL, running thru Splits mind.

LOL, Splits tryna fit it.

[Spurtacular]

:lol

Your tap dancing is exactly the same.

No one who is honest is afraid of simple questions, in my experience.

Anyone pretending Hillary isn't a criminal is a crusty vag slurper. They're just not priority to me, tbh. You can make it about come-ons, but I've stated my position clearly and repeatedly. No amount of crying will be changing that, for purposes of this thread.

[Spurtacular]

I don't know much of anything about Hillary Clinton. I didn't vote for her or Trump...because Trump is a moron and a conman and Clinton is just part of oligarchy. I fact, I barely post on this forum because I'm indifferent towards the government. I only hang out down here now because Trump is easily the most entertaining president ever and I'm enjoying the back and forth about the Russia stuff(and watching ducks sink to new levels of low function). If Clinton would have won I likely would have just stopped paying attention again.

All that said, I haven't seen any news where Clinton was ever charged with anything. I figure that would be pretty important. I've seen some stuff about emails and people mad about some guys that got left in Bengazi or something like that but that's about it. Are these part of the crimes you speak of? Are there others that I don't know about? Serious question.

Start a thread on it, then.

[spurraider21]

Anyone pretending Hillary isn't a criminal is a crusty vag slurper. They're just not priority to me, tbh. You can make it about come-ons, but I've stated my position clearly and repeatedly. No amount of crying will be changing that, for purposes of this thread.
You've been pretending she isn't a criminal throughout this whole thread. That makes you a crusty vag slurper. Good job.

[benefactor]

Start a thread on it, then.
About what? What you have already started a thread about? All I'm doing is asking questions that are pertinent to the subject matter of a thread that you started. Seems odd that you refuse to answer them or add your insight on this subject that you felt was important enough to start a thread about.

[AaronY]

Just keep him talking guise :corn:

[Pavlov]

Start a thread on it, then.You already did.

It's called Nate Silver: Hillary's Crimes Cost Her The Election.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=271003

We really just want to know the crimes. You can act totes superior once you've listed them and showed us all what for.

[DMC]

Aw, trying to help your little buddy again.

Maybe he'll be impressed by your Starbuck's bomb fantasy.

:wakeup

[Pavlov]

:wakeupNot much of a coffee drinker but if I have to choose a favorite, it's still there.

[DMC]

Not much of a coffee drinker but if I have to choose a favorite, it's still there.

You'll need something to wash that shit sandwich down, eh Muslim lover?

[Pavlov]

You'll need something to wash that shit sandwich down, eh Muslim lover?Nope. Doing fine. Thanks for the attention, I guess.

[Spurtacular]

You've been pretending she isn't a criminal throughout this whole thread. That makes you a crusty vag slurper. Good job.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

About what? What you have already started a thread about? All I'm doing is asking questions that are pertinent to the subject matter of a thread that you started. Seems odd that you refuse to answer them or add your insight on this subject that you felt was important enough to start a thread about.

I didn't start a thread to go over Hillary's litany of crimes.

This is Hillary Crimes 551 ('Losing The Presidential Election') not Hillary Crimes 101 (Intro To Hillary's Crimes).

Again, if you're that interested in reviewing her crimes, start a thread on it. I'm sure you'll learn plenty there. And you'll get her cuck deniers in full force there, too.

[Spurtacular]

You are as fucking stupid as rmt. Jesus fucking Christ. Answer the question you little faggot

Blow.

[Pavlov]

I didn't start a thread to go over Hillary's litany of crimes.

This is Hillary Crimes 551 ('Losing The Presidential Election') not Hillary Crimes 101 (Intro To Hillary's Crimes).

Again, if you're that interested in reviewing her crimes, start a thread on it. I'm sure you'll learn plenty there. And you'll get her cuck deniers in full force there, too.If you just named them, we'd quit asking.

[Spurtacular]

If you just named them, we'd quit asking.

If you shut the fuck up, you'd quit asking.

[AaronY]

I didn't start a thread to go over Hillary's litany of crimes
what crimes?

[Pavlov]

If you shut the fuck up, you'd quit asking.:lol why are you so loathe to list her many crimes?

You should be eager and proud.

[spurraider21]

:lmao
you are pretending she isn't a criminal. if she was a criminal, she would have committed crimes. you havent been able to name one crime she's committed

[Spurtacular]

Aw, trying to help your little buddy again.

Maybe he'll be impressed by your Starbuck's bomb fantasy.

Day fucking after (not even 24 hours). You still calling this shit fantasy?

[Chucho]

you are pretending she isn't a criminal. if she was a criminal, she would have committed crimes. you havent been able to name one crime she's committed

OJ isn't a murderer either, but Jimmy Kimmel called him one.

[Spurtacular]

OJ isn't a murderer either, but Jimmy Kimmel called him one.

Cucks just sunk, tbh.

[Pavlov]

Day fucking after (not even 24 hours). You still calling this shit fantasy?Yes. If you read his fantasy, you'll see he was talking about the bombing of my "favorite Starbucks."

You still haven't listed Hillary's many crimes. Why not just list them?

[spurraider21]

OJ isn't a murderer either, but Jimmy Kimmel called him one.
at least kimmel is able to identify a crime he claims OJ has committed :lol... cant say the same for jimmerfag

[Pavlov]

at least kimmel is able to identify a crime he claims OJ has committed :lol... cant say the same for jimmerfag:lol But her crimes.

[Chucho]

at least kimmel is able to identify a crime he claims OJ has committed :lol... cant say the same for jimmerfag

That's fair.

[Spurtacular]

Yes. If you read his fantasy, you'll see he was talking about the bombing of my "favorite Starbucks."


Oh, so you want to completely ignore the essence of what he was saying and pretend that he was outright being literal?

[Spurtacular]

at least kimmel is able to identify a crime he claims OJ has committed :lol... cant say the same for jimmerfag

Yea, sadly you can't identify a Hillary crime. You've even exonerated her. :lmao

[AaronY]

Yea, sadly you can't identify a Hillary crime.

what crimes?

[spurraider21]

Yea, sadly you can't identify a Hillary crime.
http://images.buddytv.com/usrimages/usr1040323/1040323_787cbd31-1c4d-4992-82e1-f0260be93617-1.jpg

[Spurtacular]

what crimes?

Go ahead and tell us.

[AaronY]

Go ahead and tell us.
Tell us about what? her crimes? I was wondering what they were tbh. Hoping maybe you could list them if at all possible. thank you in advance

[benefactor]

I didn't start a thread to go over Hillary's litany of crimes.

This is Hillary Crimes 551 ('Losing The Presidential Election') not Hillary Crimes 101 (Intro To Hillary's Crimes).

Again, if you're that interested in reviewing her crimes, start a thread on it. I'm sure you'll learn plenty there. And you'll get her cuck deniers in full force there, too.
Well I went back to the OP and read the article you posted. It said something about some emails referenced in a letter from Comey, but no crimes were listed. So this letter supposedly cost her the election and not crimes, yet you insist there were crimes in your thread title. So you can connect this letter to some crime, or just admit you lied about there being crimes at all. Pretty cut and dry tbh

[Pavlov]

Go ahead and tell us.We didn't see any in the article you posted. It's your thread, so we'd like for you to explain the crimes you explicitly claimed in your thread title.

Thanks in advance.

[Spurtacular]

Tell us about what? her crimes? I was wondering what they were tbh. Hoping maybe you could list them if at all possible. thank you in advance

Well, if you're wondering, then you shouldn't follow politics; because you obviously suck at it.

[Spurtacular]

Well I went back to the OP and read the article you posted. It said something about some emails referenced in a letter from Comey, but no crimes were listed. So this letter supposedly cost her the election and not crimes, yet you insist there were crimes in your thread title. So you can connect this letter to some crime, or just admit you lied about there being crimes at all. Pretty cut and dry tbh

Or I can tell you it's not my problem if you don't give a shit about having simple background knowledge on the most notorious person of your lifetime.

[clambake]

Or I can tell you it's not my problem if you don't give a shit about having simple background knowledge on the most notorious person of your lifetime.

you are actually giving her credibility. you should not do that.

[dabom]

There is nothing wrong about being wrong. Being wrong and trying to justify it is wrong. Know the difference faggot.

At the end of the day it becomes a shtick and a caricature of yourself.

[dabom]

You don't get brownie points for debating for the sake of.

[Spurtacular]

you are actually giving her credibility. you should not do that.

Notoriety is not a matter of credit. Hitler was the most notorious person of his time.

[clambake]

Notoriety is not a matter of credit. Hitler was the most notorious person of his time.

how about this: can you name any hitler crimes?

[Pavlov]

Well, if you're wondering, then you shouldn't follow politics; because you obviously suck at it.


Or I can tell you it's not my problem if you don't give a shit about having simple background knowledge on the most notorious person of your lifetime.We'd love to have that knowledge.

All you have to do is list her crimes.

[benefactor]

Or I can tell you it's not my problem if you don't give a shit about having simple background knowledge on the most notorious person of your lifetime.
And I can tell you I can't find any crimes in that letter...so it kinda is your problem since you claimed there were in the thread title.

[clambake]

he said crimes. so, thats more than one.

[boutons_deux]

dickless rightwingers got nothing but Hannity bullshit lies :lol

Lock Her Up! :lol