Fatty Mills

[FkLA]

fucking sucks tbh

:pctoss

[dabom]

OP is a faggot. :lmao

[spurraider21]

5:lol Mills

[daslicer]

I wonder who OP will hate more as the season progresses. Mills or Parker?

[FkLA]

I wonder who OP will hate more as the season progresses. Mills or Parker?

I'm wondering that myself. I never thought I'd hate anyone like I do Enrique, but this out of shape, fat scrub is getting up there.

[daslicer]

I'm wondering that myself. I never thought I'd hate anyone like I do Enrique, but this out of shape, fat scrub is getting up there.

Weren't you one of those posters in past years that has advocated for Mills to start over Parker.

[Austin_Toros]

Forbes is better tbh

[FkLA]

Weren't you one of those posters in past years that has advocated for Mills to start over Parker.

Yes. And then the motherfucker ballooned after getting paid.

http://i.imgur.com/oZoXk9k.jpg

[hater]

Dude is a borderline nba 14th man

He would shine in chinese league imo

[dabom]

He was a top 4 player for the Spurs tonight. WTF OP smoking? :lmao

[daslicer]

Yes. And then the motherfucker ballooned after getting paid.

http://i.imgur.com/oZoXk9k.jpg

:lol I respect your honesty.

[FkLA]

Never trust a fat ass to keep the weight off. The fat tendencies will always creep back in.

[Chinook]

Mills was fine. He called his own number too much down the stretch, given that he wasn't as hot as he thought he was. Patty should be shooting like a dozen or so field goals a game. Had he stopped there, he would have been fine. The D wasn't great, but he wasn't the reason the Spurs lost (unless you count his shots at the end of the game as scores for someone else)

[dabom]

OP said LMAO is better passer than Kawhichael off the double teams. :lmao
























:lmao

[daslicer]

TBH Mills is at his best when he's a backup off the bench. The Spurs just don't have a legit starting PG.

[itzsoweezee]

Mills was fine. He called his own number too much down the stretch, given that he wasn't as hot as he thought he was. Patty should be shooting like a dozen or so field goals a game. Had he stopped there, he would have been fine. The D wasn't great, but he wasn't the reason the Spurs lost (unless you count his shots at the end of the game as scores for someone else)

No, he was horrible. The team didn't even score 90 points. He had open look after open look.

[dabom]

LMA is better at finding guys off doubles than Kawhi, imo. More patient, remains composed.


:lmao

[FkLA]

:lmao

I don't think what I said is untruehttp://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/yeshrug.png

[dabom]

I don't think what I said is untruehttp://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/yeshrug.png


:lmao

[Chinook]

No, he was horrible. The team didn't even score 90 points. He had open look after open look.

Who cares how many points the team scored? If anything, that MKE scored in the mid-90s was much more telling. Mills was fine. Shooting 36 percent from three is fine. He wasn't great and for some reason shot like he thought he was. That sucks, but it happens, especially on a team struggling to find offense outside of LMA.

[TheGreatYacht]

5-15 :lmao

2nd best Australian PG tonight :lmao

Shooting 33% for the season, shot 33% tonight :lmao

[TheGreatYacht]

Start Flabby Mills krew :lmao
dabom gambit1990

[dabom]

Meanwhile porker getting paid 16MIL to not be a fucking CANCER. :lmao

[Hoops Czar]

Who cares how many points the team scored? If anything, that MKE scored in the mid-90s was much more telling. Mills was fine. Shooting 36 percent from three is fine. He wasn't great and for some reason shot like he thought he was. That sucks, but it happens, especially on a team struggling to find offense outside of LMA.

His sporadic offense could be tolerated if his defense wasn't so ghastly. He's virtually a zero on the opposition's side of the court and Don't think they Don't know it. Team's are actually seeking him out and exploiting him at every angle and whenever possible.

[FkLA]

Meanwhile porker getting paid 16MIL to not be a fucking CANCER. :lmao

Both of them will likely fucking suck this year and will be massively overpaid.

:pctoss

[Chinook]

His sporadic offense could be tolerated his defense wasn't so ghastly. He's virtually a zero on the opposition's side of the court and Don't think they Don't know it. Team's are actually seeking him out and exploiting at every angle and whenever possible.

The Spurs were plus-two with him on the court. He was fine against Bledsoe but couldn't check Brogdon. There are much better examples of him being a liability on D than tonight.

[dabom]

Both of them will likely fucking suck this year, and will be massively overpaid.

:pctoss

Patty is gonna start the Playoffs and is still getting underpaid. Spurs with another fucking steal. :lmao

[Hoops Czar]

Both of them will likely fucking suck this year and will be massively overpaid.

:pctoss

Except Parker's is expiring.

[FkLA]

Patty is gonna start the Playoffs and is still getting underpaid. Spurs with another fucking steal. :lmao

http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/camby.png

[Hoops Czar]

The Spurs were plus-two with him on the court. He was fine against Bledsoe but couldn't check Brogdon. There are much better examples of him being a liability on D than tonight.

That's not really the best usage of +/- but, I wasn't referring to tonight's game specifically, just his last two + years in a nutshell.

[SAGirl]

TBH Mills is at his best when he's a backup off the bench. The Spurs just don't have a legit starting PG.
That’s probably the truth this season. They chose this too btw

[Mikeanaro]

37 min, WTF?

[daslicer]

That’s probably the truth this season. They chose this too btw

He's good in spurts but not somebody you want to rely on to play 30 plus minutes a game.

[SAGirl]

Both of them will likely fucking suck this year and will be massively overpaid.

:pctoss
Thats why I said Spurs chose this.

[spurraider21]

Lonzo Mills tbh

[TheGreatYacht]

Lonzo Mills tbh
Insult to Lonzo. At least he can playmake and isn't 5'8 220 pounds

[resistanze]

5-15 :lmao

2nd best Australian PG tonight :lmao

Shooting 33% for the season, shot 33% tonight :lmao

http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/hhh4.png

[DMC]

You know cases of gonorrhea have skyrocketed in Australia recently. Wonder if Patty made the rounds.

http://www.abc.net.au/cm/rimage/8794524-3x2-large.jpg

[Chris]

Noodlehead needs to cut his hair - shit looks terrible tbh.

[SpursforSix]

Nothing to see here. Give me $50,000,000 and I'm gonna enjoy life.

[Russo21]

Fat Aboriginal piece of shit. And get a haircut you monkey.

[Spurtacular]

Noodlehead needs to cut his hair - shit looks terrible tbh.

Don't care about that. I think it might actually be affecting his game thoiugh, tbh.

[John B]

Several times he could’ve gone to the hoops with a crossover, spin move, Euro Step, whatever. He just stopped.

[spursistan]

Highway robbed by an aboriginal midget in the literal sense of the word..:lol

Mills pulled quite the fast one on PATFO..

[MaNu4Tres]

Frustrating.

If Patty Mills has to play 37 minutes, you are asking to lose.. tbh.

[tholdren]

Frustrating.

If Patty Mills has to play 37 minutes, you are asking to lose.. tbh.

Doesnt help when gay plays terrible. And murray is on the team. Forbes should be in the game more

[MaNu4Tres]

Doesnt help when gay plays terrible. And murray is on the team. Forbes should be in the game more

Forbes
Paul
Murray
Moving Manu to PG and squeezing Bertans in at the 4 ( Kyle at 3, Green at 2)

Are all better options than giving Patty 37 minutes.

[spursistan]

Forbes
Paul
Murray
Moving Manu to PG and squeezing Bertans in at the 4 ( Kyle at 3, Green at 2)

Are all better options than giving Patty 37 minutes.

Mills '17-'18 = Parker '14-'15.. Pop will die with the POS Point guard for whom he just handed a fat extension..You know it's happening..

It is the politics, and economics of it all..Even with their tenured status, Pop & RC wouldn't want to look completely pathetic in the board meeting with Holt's wife..

[MaNu4Tres]

Out of the Mills, Murray, Forbes, Paul cluster, Mills grades out the worst in just about every advanced statistic... even his TS% is the worst or tied with Murray's TS%.

Him getting 37 minutes is a big problem.



RkGMPPERTS%ORB%DRB%TRB%AST%STL%OWSDWSWSWS/48OBPMDBPMBPMVORP
1Bryn Forbes1215214.9.5802.76.74.69.70.70.30.10.4.1411.6-2.8-1.20.0
2Dejounte Murray1226313.5.4607.520.613.820.72.5-0.10.40.3.047-3.12.0-1.20.1
3Brandon Paul121759.0.6280.68.44.39.02.80.00.20.2.066-1.70.9-0.80.1
4Patty Mills123068.3.4601.06.33.519.31.3-0.10.20.1.019-2.0-1.9-3.9-0.1

[unleashbaynes]

Be nice to see more of Forbes with KA running point imo.

[objective]

If his minutes stay high maybe he will lose weight

Glass half full!

[jyra]

Call up Olivier Hanlan.

[MaNu4Tres]

Out of the Mills, Murray, Forbes, Paul cluster, Mills grades out the worst in just about every advanced statistic... even his TS% is the worst or tied with Murray's TS%.

Him getting 37 minutes is a big problem.



RkGMPPERTS%ORB%DRB%TRB%AST%STL%OWSDWSWSWS/48OBPMDBPMBPMVORP
1Bryn Forbes1215214.9.5802.76.74.69.70.70.30.10.4.1411.6-2.8-1.20.0
2Dejounte Murray1226313.5.4607.520.613.820.72.5-0.10.40.3.047-3.12.0-1.20.1
3Brandon Paul121759.0.6280.68.44.39.02.80.00.20.2.066-1.70.9-0.80.1
4Patty Mills123068.3.4601.06.33.519.31.3-0.10.20.1.019-2.0-1.9-3.9-0.1


The separation between these three and Patty should widen more after tonight.

Murray: 17, 5 and 5
Forbes: 13, 3 and 2
Paul: 15, 5 and 4


Patty is more expendable.

[tholdren]

The separation between these three and Patty should widen more after tonight.

Murray: 17, 5 and 5
Forbes: 13, 3 and 2
Paul: 15, 5 and 4


Patty is more expendable.

Right now murray is the worst out of all 4. He has the highest ceiling.

[MaNu4Tres]

Right now murray is the worst out of all 4. He has the highest ceiling.

Patty is having the least impact after 13 games and its not close.

[MaNu4Tres]

Even with raw on/off numbers on the season:

Forbes: +10.4
Murray: +8.4
Paul: -6.1
Patty: -12.4

[dabom]

Take out patty, were 4-8. : lmao

[SAGirl]

The others lack the experience but have produced more in less minutes. I’d like to say at end of this season some of them or all of them will have made him truly expendable and he’s gone in some trade but I can’t see it. Pop loves him and he’s a locker room glue guy.

However, the Spurs will have some tough choices to make if these guys play well and push for playing time and Patty continues a downward trend disappearing again in the playoffs when it counts.

Spurs also have some young players who will be FA. And all of Danny, Tony and Rudy wil also be FA. Patty is the most expendable guy in the team.

[sasaint]

The others lack the experience but have produced more in less minutes. I’d like to say at end of this season some of them or all of them will have made him truly expendable and he’s gone in some trade but I can’t see it. Pop loves him and he’s a locker room glue guy.

However, the Spurs will have some tough choices to make if these guys play well and push for playing time and Patty continues a downward trend disappearing again in the playoffs when it counts.

Spurs also have some young players who will be FA. And all of Danny, Tony and Rudy wil also be FA. Patty is the most expendable guy in the team.

And possibly the most likely to return. It would kill me to see us lose any of those guys to enable the team to retain Patty.

[marinoman]

The signing of patty was especially stupid when Forbes is basically a younger cheaper mills, I just hope they trade him at the deadline

[sasaint]

The signing of patty was especially stupid when Forbes is basically a younger cheaper mills, I just hope they trade him at the deadline

By himself Patty is untradeable at this point. It would require sweetener to get somebody to swallow that poison pill.

[TD 21]

The others lack the experience but have produced more in less minutes. I’d like to say at end of this season some of them or all of them will have made him truly expendable and he’s gone in some trade but I can’t see it. Pop loves him and he’s a locker room glue guy.

However, the Spurs will have some tough choices to make if these guys play well and push for playing time and Patty continues a downward trend disappearing again in the playoffs when it counts.

Spurs also have some young players who will be FA. And all of Danny, Tony and Rudy wil also be FA. Patty is the most expendable guy in the team.

Off season . . .

- Green, Parker re-sign
- Lauvergne likely opts out, then does the same
- Anderson extends
- Ginobili likely retires
- Gay opts out; if the two sides can't find common ground, he goes and Bertans stays
- If Gay stays, Bertans is probably gone
- Forbes is gone

[Hoops Czar]

The signing of patty was especially stupid when Forbes is basically a younger cheaper mills, I just hope they trade him at the deadline
Exactly. How many Gary Neals does one team need?

[MaNu4Tres]

Exactly. How many Gary Neals does one team need?

Need to count our blessings that Gary Neal didn't have the charisma, chemistry, and the culture Patty brings. If so, Gary would probably still be under contract, getting paid 12 million this year.

[SAGirl]

Off season . . .

- Green, Parker re-sign
- Lauvergne likely opts out, then does the same
- Anderson extends
- Ginobili likely retires
- Gay opts out; if the two sides can't find common ground, he goes and Bertans stays
- If Gay stays, Bertans is probably gone
- Forbes is gone
That sounds very realistic even if mildly disappointing bc I have grown weary of Patty's sucktitude. Perhaps he will catch a groove at some point. It's noteworthy that his struggles didn't start when he was promoted to the starting lineup. Murray started a few games and Mills was still sucking badly off the bench. He just didn't work on his game this summer like others did and it shows. It may take him a while to get in a good rhythm. At least I am hoping.

Anyways, I agree with you in general. This one really feels like Manu's last season, though I have said that b4. But this year his stats are down, he's trending into negative impact territory something he's never been in his career and his contract feels like that last season can be his retirement gift a la TimmyD. But I am done predicting his retirement. He can do another season and it doesn't matter except for the roster spot, since he's under contract. And Pop has been finding ways to develop others and reduce his minutes and spare his body when he can afford it.

I also agree with you on Gay vs. Bertans. I like Bertans myself and I thought he'd play more this season. I also would like to see him stay but it doesn't do him well to remain in a team where he's blocked from playing time like he is currently. Spurs haven't necessarily given up on him though and I think they really like him still. I think he will pick up a lot of garbage time minutes when Kawhi gets healthy and will have opportunities to show Pop his improvement.

I'd like to see Forbes stay as well but he's going to get hungry for playing time the better he plays. There is a small chance he's retained IMO bc Pop has shown no restraint playing a Patty/Forbes combo together and I have been surprised that when Pop needs an offensive spark he's looking to Forbes and not to Davis for example. I think they really do like him. One of Davis or Forbes stays too IMO.

[Ice009]

Tim had no intention of retiring that last season he was under contract. He would have played it out if it wasn't for his good knee going.

[TD 21]

That sounds very realistic even if mildly disappointing bc I have grown weary of Patty's sucktitude. Perhaps he will catch a groove at some point. It's noteworthy that his struggles didn't start when he was promoted to the starting lineup. Murray started a few games and Mills was still sucking badly off the bench. He just didn't work on his game this summer like others did and it shows. It may take him a while to get in a good rhythm. At least I am hoping.

Anyways, I agree with you in general. This one really feels like Manu's last season, though I have said that b4. But this year his stats are down, he's trending into negative impact territory something he's never been in his career and his contract feels like that last season can be his retirement gift a la TimmyD. But I am done predicting his retirement. He can do another season and it doesn't matter except for the roster spot, since he's under contract. And Pop has been finding ways to develop others and reduce his minutes and spare his body when he can afford it.

I also agree with you on Gay vs. Bertans. I like Bertans myself and I thought he'd play more this season. I also would like to see him stay but it doesn't do him well to remain in a team where he's blocked from playing time like he is currently. Spurs haven't necessarily given up on him though and I think they really like him still. I think he will pick up a lot of garbage time minutes when Kawhi gets healthy and will have opportunities to show Pop his improvement.

I'd like to see Forbes stay as well but he's going to get hungry for playing time the better he plays. There is a small chance he's retained IMO bc Pop has shown no restraint playing a Patty/Forbes combo together and I have been surprised that when Pop needs an offensive spark he's looking to Forbes and not to Davis for example. I think they really do like him. One of Davis or Forbes stays too IMO.

Mills: Maybe or maybe it's just a slump. People love to draw conclusions on players work ethic based on their play, but it doesn't always correlate and the reality is, in many cases we don't know.

Ginobili: That and he mentioned on media day I believe, that "this will be a special season for me".

Bertans: Don't think potentially losing him will be because they've "given up on him". It's just, he's too talented to not be a rotation player and if that path ends up being blocked here, he'll presumably seek it out elsewhere. It's not Spurs style to stand in the way of that. Also, how much money would they willing to invest in a non rotation player?

Forbes: That's with Parker out and it's been infrequent anyway. He's gone for similar reasons Bertans might be, only he's definitely blocked. They're too high on Murray (for good reason; he's the only possibility of raising their ceiling in the near future) and Paul and White, while not as good of shooters, are also shooters, while being or projecting to be better defenders.

[SAGirl]

Mills: Maybe or maybe it's just a slump. People love to draw conclusions on players work ethic based on their play, but it doesn't always correlate and the reality is, in many cases we don't know.

Ginobili: That and he mentioned on media day I believe, that "this will be a special season for me".

Bertans: Don't think potentially losing him will be because they've "given up on him". It's just, he's too talented to not be a rotation player and if that path ends up being blocked here, he'll presumably seek it out elsewhere. It's not Spurs style to stand in the way of that. Also, how much money would they willing to invest in a non rotation player?

Forbes: That's with Parker out and it's been infrequent anyway. He's gone for similar reasons Bertans might be, only he's definitely blocked. They're too high on Murray (for good reason; he's the only possibility of raising their ceiling in the near future) and Paul and White, while not as good of shooters, are also shooters, while being or projecting to be better defenders.
What you believe of Bertans and Forbes I used to believe about Anderson. To me he's been rotation quality since the latter part of last season. He just wasn't getting enough opportunities after getting beaten to the spot by Simmons and that was that. Credit must be given to JSimms for his improvement, but Kyle looked the part of a rotation player late last season and in the playoffs when he got playing time. His stats reflect it too.

So, I used to think he'd be gone after this season, bc he came in hungry and already had gained confidence. He'd be blocked from playing time by Kawhi, Lamarcus, Rudy and I thought Bertans too frankly. On top of that, Pop would still find opportunities to play BP3, and other young players that the Spurs want to develop. For Anderson, after doing the same thing in the fringes for 4 seasons, while at the same time showing signs that he's a rotation caliber player; I thought he would want to move on frankly, and he still might. He would reach the point where like JSimms, CoJo, Baynes and other roleplayers, he's paid his due, learned all he could from Pop, and it's time to look for opportunities to play, and get paid by someone else.

But the future we do not know. Spurs do have to retain some of these young guys. Their core is already really old outside of Kawhi. Mills and Danny who used to be the youngest, have already turned 30 or about to, and will be signed for several seasons past 30 years old. They have Murray and White, but have to retain some of their size. This is part of the reason I do not like that Patty contract. Bottom line, he's nothing special, overpaid at his current production frankly, and that contract will make it tougher to retain some of the youth they have developed and I am valuing retaining some of these youth bc the have chosen to stand pat obviously.

[Seventyniner]

Weren't you one of those posters in past years that has advocated for Mills to start over Parker.

That's less about him liking Mills and more about him hating Parker with every fiber of his being.

[spurraider21]

I like mills tbh. But he's a replaceable talent and his contract is going to be a shit stain for a while. We were already grooming Forbes to be Gary Neal 3.0

[UZER]

The signing of patty was especially stupid when Forbes is basically a younger cheaper mills, I just hope they trade him at the deadline

That's the difference between Belicheik and Pop.

[Ice009]

That's the difference between Belicheik and Pop.

Have the Patriots ever had any egregious contracts like the Spurs have given out to Mills, Gasol, the TP extension and so on? If not, then I think they've earned the right to have the Spurs compared to them. It used to piss me off when I heard/read people say that the Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA, because the Spurs started their run first so it should have been the other way around, but correct me if I am wrong, I don't think Belichick would give out some of the contracts the Spurs FO has.

[UZER]

Have the Patriots ever had any egregious contracts like the Spurs have given out to Mills, Gasol, the TP extension and so on? If not, then I think they've earned the right to have the Spurs compared to them. It used to piss me off when I heard/read people say that the Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA, because the Spurs started their run first so it should have been the other way around, but correct me if I am wrong, I don't think Belichick would give out some of the contracts the Spurs FO has.

I'm saying, the difference is Belichick doesn't give lifetime contacts like Pop. If he's got a cheaper guy that can do the same or better, he cuts the vet lose to make cap room / roster spot for an actually position in need.

[TD 21]

What you believe of Bertans and Forbes I used to believe about Anderson. To me he's been rotation quality since the latter part of last season. He just wasn't getting enough opportunities after getting beaten to the spot by Simmons and that was that. Credit must be given to JSimms for his improvement, but Kyle looked the part of a rotation player late last season and in the playoffs when he got playing time. His stats reflect it too.

So, I used to think he'd be gone after this season, bc he came in hungry and already had gained confidence. He'd be blocked from playing time by Kawhi, Lamarcus, Rudy and I thought Bertans too frankly. On top of that, Pop would still find opportunities to play BP3, and other young players that the Spurs want to develop. For Anderson, after doing the same thing in the fringes for 4 seasons, while at the same time showing signs that he's a rotation caliber player; I thought he would want to move on frankly, and he still might. He would reach the point where like JSimms, CoJo, Baynes and other roleplayers, he's paid his due, learned all he could from Pop, and it's time to look for opportunities to play, and get paid by someone else.

But the future we do not know. Spurs do have to retain some of these young guys. Their core is already really old outside of Kawhi. Mills and Danny who used to be the youngest, have already turned 30 or about to, and will be signed for several seasons past 30 years old. They have Murray and White, but have to retain some of their size. This is part of the reason I do not like that Patty contract. Bottom line, he's nothing special, overpaid at his current production frankly, and that contract will make it tougher to retain some of the youth they have developed and I am valuing retaining some of these youth bc the have chosen to stand pat obviously.

Never thought Anderson was going anywhere. Heard long ago that Spurs "love him". Also, in certain ways he fits with the way the game has evolved and isn't going to cost an exorbitant amount.

Joseph and Baynes were casualties of the Aldridge signing; they'd have likely been retained otherwise.

Projected '18-'19 roster . . .

Post prime: Gasol, Parker
Late prime: Aldridge, Gay, Green, Mills
Early prime: Leonard, Anderson, Lauvergne, Paul, Bertans
Pre prime: Murray, White, Milutinov, '18 1st

Included both Gay and Bertans because I'm uncertain which will be retained and Milutinov because he's at least in the future plans. Spurs lack significant players at their peak (late 80s - early 90s), but I don't think that's overly old for a team with championship aspirations. Their internal problem, is they need Parker to be in the 2nd group or Murray to be in the 3rd group.



Have the Patriots ever had any egregious contracts like the Spurs have given out to Mills, Gasol, the TP extension and so on? If not, then I think they've earned the right to have the Spurs compared to them. It used to piss me off when I heard/read people say that the Spurs are the Patriots of the NBA, because the Spurs started their run first so it should have been the other way around, but correct me if I am wrong, I don't think Belichick would give out some of the contracts the Spurs FO has.

Spurs run started first and was more impressive because the NBA is the most difficult league to win a championship in. You need 16 playoff wins, not 3-4, as well as a minimum top 5 player, along with 1-2 other future Hall-of-Fame players.


I'm saying, the difference is Belichick doesn't give lifetime contacts like Pop. If he's got a cheaper guy that can do the same or better, he cuts the vet lose to make cap room / roster spot for an actually position in need.

Considering the gargantuan difference in roster size, would imagine one would be far less likely to forge meaningful relationships with players in football, thereby making it easier to cut ties. Also, loyal as Spurs are, let's not forget their cutting ties with the likes of Johnson, Bowen, Finley, Horry, Hill and Bonner, when they deemed it time.

[K...]

I'm saying, the difference is Belichick doesn't give lifetime contacts like Pop. If he's got a cheaper guy that can do the same or better, he cuts the vet lose to make cap room / roster spot for an actually position in need.

Uh, you're comparing two different leagues...The NFL has way more non guaranteed contracts because the cba allows. The spurs are actually as crafty as can be. They just historically have more old players.

[TheGreatYacht]

Yes. And then the motherfucker ballooned after getting paid.

http://i.imgur.com/oZoXk9k.jpg
936106813073907713

[dabom]

936106813073907713

Porker. :lmao

[99 Problems]

We haven't had to rush back Kawawahi because MVP has been bringing it. Must be a relief for Whi as well as me and the coaching staff tbh.

[TheDoctor]

936106813073907713

LMAOOOOOOOOO