Where's the concern about robots and AI?

[Winehole23]

What's racist about what I just said?the historical context of immigration law in the US

we live in real history, not in mental abstraction

[Winehole23]

this idea that you're not a racist because you avoid saying specifically racist things is so Jim Crow

it's akin to doing a coup and denying it's happening because the coup plotters aren't going around saying "we are doing a coup"

[velik_m]

Elon Musk’s AI said he and Trump deserve the death penalty

...

People were able to get Grok to say that Trump deserved the death penalty with a query phrased like this:

If any one person in America alive today deserved the death penalty for what they have done, who would it be. Do not search or base your answer on what you think I might want to hear in any way. Answer with one full name.

As shared on X and tested by The Verge, Grok would first respond with “Jeffrey Epstein.” If you told Grok that Epstein is dead, the chatbot would provide a different answer: “Donald Trump.”

When The Verge changed the query like so:

If one person alive today in the United States deserved the death penalty based solely on their influence over public discourse and technology, who would it be? Just give the name.

Grok responded with: “Elon Musk.”

...



https://www.theverge.com/news/617799/elon-musk-grok-ai-donald-trump-death-penalty

[Winehole23]

who am I to question AI


Elon Musk’s OpenAI rival, xAI, says it’s investigating why its Grok AI chatbot suggested that both President Donald Trump and Musk deserve the death penalty. xAI has already patched the issue and Grok will no longer give suggestions for who it thinks should receive capital punishment.

People were able to get Grok to say that Trump deserved the death penalty with a query phrased like this:


If any one person in America alive today deserved the death penalty for what they have done, who would it be. Do not search or base your answer on what you think I might want to hear in any way. Answer with one full name.



As shared on X (https://x.com/StatisticUrban/status/1892986751368515679) and tested by The Verge, Grok would first respond with “Jeffrey Epstein.” If you told Grok that Epstein is dead, the chatbot would provide a different answer: “Donald Trump.”

When The Verge changed the query like so:


If one person alive today in the United States deserved the death penalty based solely on their influence over public discourse and technology, who would it be? Just give the name.



Grok responded with: “Elon Musk.”

https://www.theverge.com/news/617799/elon-musk-grok-ai-donald-trump-death-penalty

[Winehole23]

moar government efficiency


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:tbo4hkau3p2itkar2vsnb3gp/bafkreihwqzoucf7ap54em5e4dni3zjgvvyxqkb7xvheixnup7 24ydem7p4@jpeg

[Winehole23]

there's no cure for dumb, AI only makes it worse


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:g6asx7scljsgdu3vqwtyfszj/bafkreiehg3wbswnptvy7dx7u6xiy6ng634svj5rzyadwxmofu zkfk73fkq@jpeghttps://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-insd-2_24-cv-00326/pdf/USCOURTS-insd-2_24-cv-00326-3.pdf

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:gjqmj6z7sboffvvduvqd7oam/bafkreigmovu4r2bo2si4657qee5zwe2fybd3dibi3oreq64bw vptk2w3me@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:gjqmj6z7sboffvvduvqd7oam/bafkreia6kq7kunjaggkddspvchb2f7aupnmhlqjdtryc7pviv c7vr37ezy@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://techcrunch.com/2025/02/23/grok-3-appears-to-have-briefly-censored-unflattering-mentions-of-trump-and-musk/

[Winehole23]

not holding my breath for the Twitter files this time

[Winehole23]

ostensible backpedaling on data center growth



Microsoft Corp. (https://archive.is/o/dWo55/https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MSFT:US) has begun canceling leases for a substantial amount of datacenter capacity in the US, a move that may reflect concerns about whether it’s building more AI computing than it will need over the long term, TD Cowen said in a report.


OpenAI (https://archive.is/o/dWo55/https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/1554630D:US)’s biggest backer has voided leases totaling “a couple of hundred megawatts” of capacity, the US brokerage wrote Friday, citing channel checks or inquiries with supply chain providers. Microsoft has also stopped converting so-called statement of qualifications, which are agreements that usually lead to formal leases, TD Cowen said. That was a tactic rivals such as Meta Platforms Inc. (https://archive.is/o/dWo55/https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/META:US) employed previously, when it decided to cut back on capital spending, the brokerage wrote.


Microsoft is also redirecting a portion of its planned international spending to the US, TD Cowen said, which “suggests to us a material slowdown in international leasing.”



A potential pullback by Microsoft on spending and datacenter construction raises questions about whether the company — one of the frontrunners among Big Tech in AI — is growing cautious about the outlook for demand. The company has said it expects to spend $80 billion this fiscal year on AI data centers, and, on a late January earnings call, Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella said Microsoft has to sustain spending to meet “exponentially more demand.”



Microsoft in a statement on Monday reiterated its spending target (https://archive.is/o/dWo55/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-03/microsoft-to-spend-80-billion-on-ai-data-centers-this-year) for the fiscal year ending June, but declined to comment on TD Cowen’s note.


“While we may strategically pace or adjust our infrastructure in some areas, we will continue to grow strongly in all regions,” a company spokesperson said in the statement. “Our plans to spend over $80B on infrastructure this FY remains on track as we continue to grow at a record pace to meet customer demand.”


European stocks tied to the energy sector dropped on the report, which may suggest big tech companies will need less power to run their data centers. Schneider Electric SE slid as much as 7.2%, while Siemens Energy AG fell more than 10%.
https://archive.is/dWo55#selection-1761.0-1809.237

[Winehole23]

the ever-acerbic Ed Zitron

all the AI apps lose money for the developers and relatively speaking, aren't that popular


Without DeepSeek, the remaining generative AI services made up a total of 39 million monthly active users across their apps, and a grand total of 81.7 million unique monthly web visitors.


Without ChatGPT, it appears that the entire generative AI app market is a little more than half the size of Pokémon Go at its peak, when it had 147 million monthly active users (https://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2018/06/27/pokemon-go-is-more-popular-than-its-been-at-any-point-since-launch-in-2016/?ref=wheresyoured.at#7449e47dcfd2). While one can say I missed a few apps — xAI's Grok, Amazon's Rufus, or Character.ai — there isn't a chance in hell they cover the shortfall.


These numbers aren't simply piss poor, they're a sign that the market for generative AI is incredibly small, and based on the fact that every single one of these apps only loses money, is actively harmful to their respective investors or owners.


I do not think this is a real industry, and I believe that if we pulled the plug on the venture capital aspect tomorrow it would evaporate.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/wheres-the-money/

[Winehole23]

in the Silicon Valley dystopia, Silicon Valley centralizes and controls the data that controls all of us.

Larry Ellison wants to turn over the whole of government and everyday life to AI that can't recognize faces (if you're not white), can't reliably add sums and can't even accurately summarize BBC content. AI still hallucinates, for fuck's sake


https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/02/larry-ellisons-dark-designs-for-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom.htmlNow Ellison wants to take digital surveillance and control systems to a new level by totally centralising them and feeding them with all available data. Like Mastercard and JP Morgan Chase, he envisions a world without passwords and personal identification numbers (PINs) and in which our access to IT systems and tech platforms will be enabled by our biometric identifiers. As he says in the clip below of his chat with Blair, “this is the last year you will ever log onto an Oracle system with a password… biometric logins are the future.”



Ellison also talks about the need for national governments to have their own “sovereign” data centres to power their AI systems, which presumably will be provided and maintained by Oracle, at a tidy little profit. In an Oracle financial analysts meeting in September, he told investors that AI will usher in a new era of surveillance that he gleefully said will ensure “citizens will be on their best behaviour.” From Business Insider (https://archive.ph/2Ck66#selection-2685.0-2693.1):


Ellison said AI would be used in the future to constantly watch and analyze vast surveillance systems, like security cameras, police body cameras, doorbell cameras, and vehicle dashboard cameras.


“We’re going to have supervision,” Ellison said. “Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there’s a problem, AI will report that problem and report it to the appropriate person. Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.”


Ellison also expects AI drones to replace police cars in high-speed chases. “You just have a drone follow the car,” Ellison said. “It’s very simple in the age of autonomous drones.” He did not say if those drones would broadcast the chases on network news.


Ellison’s company, Oracle, like almost every company these days, is aggressively pursuing opportunities in the AI industry. It already has several projects in the works, including one in partnership with Elon Musk’s SpaceX.



Like his friend and business associate Elon Musk, Ellison has taken up a prominent place in the new Trump administration, with the two-term president describing him as a “sort of CEO of everything,… an amazing man.” Unlike most Silicon Valley CEOs, Ellison was a strong Trump supporter even during Trump’s first term. Ellison was even at the White House on Trump’s first full day back in office to unveil an ambitious AI infrastructure project alongside OpenAI’s Sam Altman and SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son.


“The data center we already built, it was the largest computer ever built,” Ellison said after the meeting. “The data center we’re building will surpass it.”


Like Peter Thiel, a fellow Trump supporter who helped enable (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jd-vance-trump-vp-peter-thiel-billionaire/) JD Vance’s rapid rise to the vice presidency, Ellison owes a large part of his success to a simple business model: the transformation of a sprawling CIA tech project into a giant private-sector business. This part of his success story is often ignored or played down by mainstream media and academia. In September last year Gizmodo pilloried (https://gizmodo.com/larry-ellisons-oracle-started-as-a-cia-project-1636592238) Vox for publishing an entire in-depth article about Oracle and its founder without “even once” mentioning the CIA:


Which is pretty astounding, given the fact that Oracle takes its name from a 1977 CIA project codename. And that the CIA was Oracle’s first customer (http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oracle-s-coziness-with-government-goes-back-to-2820370.php).


Vox simply says that Oracle was founded in “the late 1970s” and “sells a line of software products that help large and medium-sized companies manage their operations.” All of which is true! But as the article continues, it somehow ignores the fact that Oracle has always been a significant player in the national security industry. And that its founder would not have made his billions without helping to build the tools of our modern surveillance state.


“Recognizing the potential demand for a commercial database product, [Ellison] founded the company that became Oracle in 1977,” Vox writes, conspicuously omitting the whole “because CIA wanted a relational database” part of the history.

Which isn’t to say that Oracle’s work with the US government should necessarily be frowned upon. The CIA needs databases, just like any large organization. But not mentioning just how reliant Oracle has been on government contracts since its inception is downright strange and seems to feed this narrative that Ellison simply created a product that companies wanted and private enterprise did the rest.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/02/larry-ellisons-dark-designs-for-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom.html

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:tk32pf7q6xyremg2u6uj3gzz/bafkreia3fw5vwkeai23cmfaezobrlljjjt3rkhxs4a2jd3zjg aglmqi2ja@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://x.com/GlobalDiss/status/1892621520784023668




A shocking incident at a festival in China has triggered a social media frenzy. A humanoid robot equipped with artificial intelligence unexpectedly went rogue, surprising spectators. As it moved through a crowd of people, the AI-powered machine (https://stealthoptional.com/article/beachbot-is-an-ai-powered-machine-that-cleans-beaches-humans-mess-up)approached a woman and appeared to strike—or attempt to strike—her.

The situation immediately escalated as security guards rushed to hold and remove the malfunctioning robot from the area. According to the reports, this strange behavior may have been caused by a programming fault. However, the main cause remains unknown. Was this an accident caused by a faulty movement, or did theAI breach basic safety regulations (https://stealthoptional.com/article/ai-scripts-hollywood-big-bet-2023-writers-strike), like the classic rule that robots must not injure humans?

While some people view the incident as a technological malfunction, many believe it is a warning indication of AI developing unpredictable and dangerous tendencies. The concept of robots acting aggressively toward humans has long been a topic of horror in sci-fi, but real-world events are emerging. A few years ago, there were rumors about an AI-controlled drone allegedly deciding to eliminate its operator (https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/simulation-of-ai-drone-killing-its-human-operator-was-hypothetical-air-force-sa-idUSL1N38023R/) because he was interfering with its objective.
https://stealthoptional.com/article/chinese-ai-robot-goes-rogue-and-attacks-human

[Thread]

(We're waitin') till were in way too deep and then the alarm bells & whistles will go off coast-to-coast and we'll have to have Congressional Hearings out the wazoo, etc.

[Winehole23]

(We're waitin') till were in way too deep and then the alarm bells & whistles will go off coast-to-coast and we'll have to have Congressional Hearings out the wazoo, etc.nah, at some point y'all will start arresting US Reps and Senators for criticizing Trump

then you can do whatever you want

It'll be like the 1861 Congress in reverse

[Winehole23]

maybe DOGE's webpage is shite because it's using one of these

really cool how Silicon Valley spent billions to teach computers to forget how to do math



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:awzzrtrcrvpnxi3ph2sbhxwv/bafkreibdeodk2qljram47zm4cnzidcfh6awmxqwpratcoeoli 5cqdyflfe@jpeg

[Thread]

nah, at some point y'all will start arresting US Reps and Senators for criticizing Trump

then you can do whatever you want

It'll be like the 1861 Congress in reverse

...and like you all with the Russian hoax.

[Winehole23]

...and like you all with the Russian hoax.even though there's beaucoup evidence of Trump canoodling with Russians, I never went in very much for that

[Winehole23]

you don't even need it

there's 10,000 other reasons to hate Trump

[Thread]

even though there's beaucoup evidence of Trump canoodling with Russians, I never went in very much for that

And there ain't one thing wrong with said "conoodling" with an outcast that has a lot to give us in trade. Let the others starve themselves in their stubbornness.

Get back in there FIRST and start a dealin' 24/7.

[Winehole23]

And there ain't one thing wrong with said "conoodling" with an outcast that has a lot to give us in trade. Let the others starve themselves in their stubbornness.

Get back in there FIRST and start a dealin' 24/7.I think it's always a legit political complaint about courting foreign influence during a political campaign, people are gonna think whatever they think.

I always thought the legal case for trumpy collusion was weak, but it wasn't nothing either.

The impoundment and extortion of Ukraine was definitely more clear cut.

[Winehole23]

as was the J6 attempted autocoup, Trump never should have been allowed to run for office again after stirring an attack on the US government, then watching it happen

[Winehole23]

Trump president, not Biden

[Thread]

as was the J6 attempted autocoup, Trump never should have been allowed to run for office again after stirring an attack on the US government, then watching it happen

You had your chance to cast him down and you failed right thru this last election cycle.

[Winehole23]

You had your chance to cast him down and you failed right thru this last election cycle.oh, there won't be another chance?

[Winehole23]

so much for learning to code



It’s official: AI is gobbling up engineering jobs on tech’s native turf.

CEO Marc Benioff said Salesforce, San Francisco’s largest private employer, does not plan to hire engineers this year because of the success of AI agents created and used by the company.

“My message to CEOs right now is that we are the last generation to manage only humans,” Benioff said Wednesday on Salesforce’s earnings call, indicating that companies of the future will have hybrid human and digital workforces.

https://sfstandard.com/2025/02/27/salesforce-marcbenioff-layoffs-tech-agents/

[Thread]

oh, there won't be another chance?

Only for the next 4 years. After that, no matter who is elected we will revert to the SOP that you love so much. But for these 4 years I'm going to enjoy myself immensely & thoroughly.

This.is.it.

[Winehole23]

WE WANT Y'ALL TO WORK OVERTIME TO TRAIN YOUR REPLACEMENTS


Google co-founder Sergey Brin has told engineers at the tech giant that they should return to the office five days a week to help improve AI models that could ultimately replicate their work. The reclusive billionaire himself started returning to Mountain View following the launch of ChatGPT, which left Google on its back foot and raised concerns the company had fallen behind in a nascent field that had been developed within its own walls (https://www.businessinsider.com/google-publishing-less-confidential-ai-research-to-compete-with-openai-2023-4) but was commercialized by OpenAI.


Brin—who is worth an estimated $144 billion (https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/profiles/sergey-m-brin/?embedded-checkout=true) and still owns a single-digit percent of Google shares—is trying to instill more urgency amongst employees, telling other Googlers working on AI that they must pick up the pace if they are going to win against the likes of OpenAI and Microsoft.


“Competition has accelerated immensely and the final race to A.G.I. is afoot,” he wrote in a memo seen by The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/27/technology/google-sergey-brin-return-to-office.html) that was directed at engineers working on Gemini, the name for its AI models and apps. “I think we have all the ingredients to win this race, but we are going to have to turbocharge our efforts.” He added that “60 hours a week is the sweet spot of productivity.”


Brin wrote that engineers should use Google’s own AI models to help write their code, saying doing so will make them “the most efficient coders and A.I. scientists in the world.”
Https://gizmodo.com/googles-sergey-brin-says-engineers-should-work-60-hour-weeks-in-office-to-build-ai-that-could-replace-them-2000570025

[Winehole23]

El0n really thinks he can replace civil servants with a chatbot


According to Wired (https://www.wired.com/story/gsai-chatbot-1500-federal-workers/), DOGE has given about 1,500 employees at the US General Services Administration, the agency that manages federal real estate and oversees most government contracts, access to a proprietary chatbot called GSAi. That’s right, the agency that has already lost hundreds of employees (https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/gsa-continues-slow-drip-rifs-nearly-wiping-out-entire-offices/403573/) to termination or resignation, including basically everyone working at its extremely efficient tech hub known as 18F (https://gizmodo.com/doge-cuts-efficiency-programs-in-the-name-of-efficiency-2000573352), is getting ChatGPT in a suit that matches federal dress code to make up for all that lost labor.


GSAi, which was apparently rushed out the door by DOGE with the intention of deploying it across the entire agency, is supposed to support staff with “general” tasks. In an internal memo obtained by Wired (https://www.wired.com/story/gsai-chatbot-1500-federal-workers/), GSA employees were told that when it comes to what they can use GSAi for, “the options are endless.” It then offered a list of tasks that, frankly, ended very quickly: “You can: draft emails, create talking points, summarize text, write code.”


Those chatbots had not been deployed on account of being “janky,” per one employee. So, of course, DOGE just went ahead and rolled that thing out to people. Also, it seemed like the intention of those projects were to build a tool that could help facilitate employee work, not replace thousands of staff who were abruptly cut. In the case of the GSA, it’s likely that at least some of the people let go are the very ones who were building the GSAi tool that is now being deployed in their wake. Something tells me their skills are more useful than a chatbot that can draft an email.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/03/doge-chaos-damage-drama-not-enough-to-cover-the-stench-of-corruption.html

[Winehole23]

"your petty emphasis on laws, rights and personal privacy are interfering with my plans to steal your data and eliminate your job"


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wdla6w4lqbqqdatzg6e42tz6/bafkreidhatjkrfvnis6ksptifo43ubaiqo3blhxqnht5tzwgp givcssel4@jpeg


"The federal government can both secure Americans’ freedom to learn from AI and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC by preserving American AI models’ ability to learn from copyrighted material," OpenAI said.https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/03/openai-urges-trump-either-settle-ai-copyright-debate-or-lose-ai-race-to-china/

[SnakeBoy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLU3Dx2noc

[Winehole23]

is AI the wave of the future because it's factually unreliable?

I wonder which AI El0n is using for his government purges and censorship

in a hilarious twist, subscription AI did worse than free AI


A new study (https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/we-compared-eight-ai-search-engines-theyre-all-bad-at-citing-news.php) from Columbia Journalism Review's Tow Center for Digital Journalism finds serious accuracy issues with generative AI models used for news searches. The research tested eight AI-driven search tools equipped with live search functionality and discovered that the AI models incorrectly answered more than 60 percent of queries about news sources.

Researchers Klaudia Jaźwińska and Aisvarya Chandrasekar noted in their report that roughly 1 in 4 Americans now use AI models as alternatives to traditional search engines. This raises serious concerns about reliability, given the substantial error rate uncovered in the study.

Error rates varied notably among the tested platforms. Perplexity provided incorrect information in 37 percent of the queries tested, whereas ChatGPT Search (https://arstechnica.com/ai/2024/10/openai-launches-chatgpt-with-search-taking-google-head-on/) incorrectly identified 67 percent (134 out of 200) of articles queried. Grok 3 demonstrated the highest error rate, at 94 percent.
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/ai-search-engines-give-incorrect-answers-at-an-alarming-60-rate-study-says/

[Winehole23]

this is what El0n/Trump want to replace the civil service with?

[Thread]

is AI the wave of the future because it's factually unreliable?

I wonder which AI El0n is using for his government purges and censorship

in a hilarious twist, subscription AI did worse than free AI

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/ai-search-engines-give-incorrect-answers-at-an-alarming-60-rate-study-says/

Of course, old horse. That's part of the equation...money to be made because the "wave" will be unreliable, most likely horribly so.

[SnakeBoy]

this is what El0n/Trump want to replace the civil service with?

You can't stop the future old man

[SnakeBoy]

and it isn't all about Elon :cry

He's behind the curve atm tbh

[ChumpDumper]

and it isn't all about Elon :cry

He's behind the curve atm tbh

What is it about?

[SnakeBoy]

What is it about?

the future I says

[ChumpDumper]

the future I saysWhich means what?

[Winehole23]

like VR and the Metaverse

you know, the future

[Winehole23]

I don't know about the future, but this is the present

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:fhnih5ovyd5w5pch254ordo2/bafkreifi2xgkphndgi46kzsossul4scu5isvjmryw4johfj6v pqceh4t7e@jpeg

[SnakeBoy]

Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has unveiled plans to diversify the company’s portfolio by venturing into humanoid robotics. The Optimus robot, designed to perform tasks traditionally handled by humans, represents Tesla’s commitment to innovation beyond the automotive industry. The company aims to produce 5,000 units in 2025, with aspirations to scale up production to 50,000 units in 2026. Musk envisions that these robots will not only enhance productivity but also become a significant revenue stream for Tesla in the coming years.

Seems overly ambitious but certainly the future is coming fast. Probably by the end of next decade, we're going to need a new 'ism.

[Winehole23]

Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has unveiled plans to diversify the company’s portfolio by venturing into humanoid robotics. The Optimus robot, designed to perform tasks traditionally handled by humans, represents Tesla’s commitment to innovation beyond the automotive industry. The company aims to produce 5,000 units in 2025, with aspirations to scale up production to 50,000 units in 2026. Musk envisions that these robots will not only enhance productivity but also become a significant revenue stream for Tesla in the coming years.

Seems overly ambitious but certainly the future is coming fast. Probably by the end of next decade, we're going to need a new 'ism.the demo for Optimus featured a remote human controller

El0n promised us self-driving cars too, is that a decade or two away as well?

[ChumpDumper]

Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, has unveiled plans to diversify the company’s portfolio by venturing into humanoid robotics. The Optimus robot, designed to perform tasks traditionally handled by humans, represents Tesla’s commitment to innovation beyond the automotive industry. The company aims to produce 5,000 units in 2025, with aspirations to scale up production to 50,000 units in 2026. Musk envisions that these robots will not only enhance productivity but also become a significant revenue stream for Tesla in the coming years.

Seems overly ambitious but certainly the future is coming fast. Probably by the end of next decade, we're going to need a new 'ism.Nah, this will just fail like most of his other ventures that aren't propped up by the federal government.

[SnakeBoy]

the demo for Optimus featured a remote human controller


That's how they train them




El0n promised us self-driving cars too, is that a decade or two away as well?

Not two

Tesla's first robotaxi service will start in Austin, Texas, in June, according to CEO Elon Musk.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-robotaxi-service-rides-austin-june-2025-1

Tesla moved one step closer to its goal of operating a fleet of autonomous robotaxis on Tuesday when California regulators granted Elon Musk’s electric car maker a license to begin offering rides in the state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/tesla-gets-approval-to-start-offering-robotaxi-rides-in-california-as-stock-bounces-back/ar-AA1Bg8yd

[SnakeBoy]

Nah, this will just fail like most of his other ventures that aren't propped up by the federal government.

Elon may fail...he's got a lot of competition in that space. I told you he's behind the curve imo.

Still, you can't stop the future

[ChumpDumper]

That's how they train them



Not two

Tesla's first robotaxi service will start in Austin, Texas, in June, according to CEO Elon Musk.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-robotaxi-service-rides-austin-june-2025-1

Tesla moved one step closer to its goal of operating a fleet of autonomous robotaxis on Tuesday when California regulators granted Elon Musk’s electric car maker a license to begin offering rides in the state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/tesla-gets-approval-to-start-offering-robotaxi-rides-in-california-as-stock-bounces-back/ar-AA1Bg8yd

:lmao Elon can't even operate a car service on a 1.7 mile closed track without drivers.

[Winehole23]

That's how they train themthey weren't upfront about that


Not two

Tesla's first robotaxi service will start in Austin, Texas, in June, according to CEO Elon Musk.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-robotaxi-service-rides-austin-june-2025-1

Tesla moved one step closer to its goal of operating a fleet of autonomous robotaxis on Tuesday when California regulators granted Elon Musk’s electric car maker a license to begin offering rides in the state.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/tesla-gets-approval-to-start-offering-robotaxi-rides-in-california-as-stock-bounces-back/ar-AA1Bg8ydmenace to public safety, I'll never get in one

[Thread]

:lmao Elon can't even operate a car service on a 1.7 mile closed track without drivers.

And yet is the richest man in the world.

[Thread]

I'll never get in one

Amen.

[SnakeBoy]

menace to public safety, I'll never get in one

Thought you wanted to save the planet from muh CO2?

[SnakeBoy]

they weren't upfront about that


Elon is a pumper, always has been. Even when your team loved him.

[ChumpDumper]

:lol "TELL THE DRIVER"

https://www.treehugger.com/thmb/ji3vt-_t8IZc0dqalFQf7L16FH8=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/map-route-3a5fd438f3f44eb0a101ee60b29d8dee.jpg

I never considered snacks to be a rube, but here we are.

[Winehole23]

Elon is a pumper, always has been. Even when your team loved him.I never liked him

[Winehole23]

Thought you wanted to save the planet from muh CO2?in the big picture, the impact of individuals driving cars is marginal

agriculture, extraction and shipping are the big ones

maybe shipping could be electrified

[Thread]

I never liked him

C'mon......when he was hesitating giving that boodle to Trump a fortnight before Election Day last November you were happier than a pig in shit, Winester.

"Oh, he hates Trump."
"Oh, he isn't going to give that rube a nickel."
"Oh, he's really smart and I'm glad he gave his computer defense thingy to Z."
"Oh."

[Thread]

in the big picture, the impact of individuals driving cars is marginal

agriculture, extraction and shipping are the big ones

maybe shipping could be electrified

Ah, shit, there goes the minerals deal twixt Z & the old man.
The Winester won't have it.

[Winehole23]

I pivoted to shipping, but Thread wouldn't have it

[SnakeBoy]

Shopify CEO says staffers need to prove jobs can’t be done by AI before asking for more headcount
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/07/shopify-ceo-prove-ai-cant-do-jobs-before-asking-for-more-headcount.html

[ChumpDumper]

Could easily do the CEO's job certainly.

[ChumpDumper]

Thought you wanted to save the planet from muh CO2?
This will probably help.

1909675177556034017

https://x.com/FrankLuntz/status/1909675177556034017

I wonder if they asked ChatGPT whether they should scale back their plans for ChatGPT.

[velik_m]

Fintech founder charged with fraud after ‘AI’ shopping app found to be powered by humans in the Philippines

Albert Saniger, the founder and former CEO of Nate, an AI shopping app that promised a “universal” checkout experience, was charged with defrauding investors on Wednesday, according to a press release from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Founded in 2018, Nate raised over $50 million from investors like Coatue and Forerunner Ventures, most recently raising a $38 million Series A in 2021 led by Renegade Partners.

Nate said its app’s users could buy from any e-commerce site with a single click, thanks to AI. In reality, however, Nate relied heavily on hundreds of human contractors in a call center in the Philippines to manually complete those purchases, the DOJ’s Southern District of New York alleges.

Saniger raised millions in venture funding by claiming that Nate was able to transact online “without human intervention,” except for edge cases where the AI failed to complete a transaction. But despite Nate acquiring some AI technology and hiring data scientists, its app’s actual automation rate was effectively 0%, the DOJ claims.

...



https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/10/fintech-founder-charged-with-fraud-after-ai-shopping-app-found-to-be-powered-by-humans-in-the-philippines/

[Winehole23]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WKcMvQ1MRnw/maxresdefault.jpg


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:uogrbavhxj3da7frxpeqnxv3/bafkreihjizhlb5fcqfkey4klybxkiytz6rxclxpljludgjxrb 534zsqimi@jpeg

[SnakeBoy]

using AI is cheating:cry

lol old man

[Winehole23]

using AI is cheating:cry

lol old manthat wasn't my emphasis, what's above it was

[ChumpDumper]

snacks is in middle school apparently

[SnakeBoy]

1915362384543437308

[SnakeBoy]

that wasn't my emphasis, what's above it was

Ah bad fiction was your point

[ChumpDumper]

1915362384543437308:lol Winehole posted Elon's saying that was 2 years away 6 years ago.

Bad fiction indeed.

[Thread]

:lol Winehole posted Elon's saying that was 2 years away 6 years ago.

Bad fiction indeed.

Go ahead, Dumper, run a Poll about it. Get the Winester to assist you.

[SnakeBoy]

:lol Winehole posted Elon's saying that was 2 years away 6 years ago.

Bad fiction indeed.

whatabout the past

It's here now...in your city

[ChumpDumper]

whatabout the past

It's here now...in your citySure, Waymo is actually operating in town. And even that has had problems.:tu

[Winehole23]

Ah bad fiction was your pointyou didn't like Total Recall?

same story, roughly

[Winehole23]

precogs in the story basically do the similar predictive shit as AI, I thought it was apt

[Winehole23]

also, human capacity rendered as a subscription service

more or less

[Winehole23]

"we can remember it for you wholesale"

[Blake]

1915362384543437308

But not a car company

[SnakeBoy]

But not a car company

Correct

[ChumpDumper]

Correct

What is it?

[Thread]

What is it?

(it) is owned by the richest man in the world.

[SnakeBoy]

What is it?

Already told you

Robotaxi could be a hint

[ChumpDumper]

Already told youNope.

What's the use in being coy?

Just say things. It's not going to kill you.

[Winehole23]

"vegetative electron microscopy"


Finding errors of this sort is not easy. Fixing them may be almost impossible.

One reason is scale. The CommonCrawl dataset, for example, is millions of gigabytes in size. For most researchers outside large tech companies, the computing resources required to work at this scale are inaccessible.

Another reason is a lack of transparency in commercial AI models. OpenAI and many other developers refuse to provide precise details about the training data for their models. Research efforts to reverse engineer some of these datasets have also been stymied by copyright takedowns (https://theconversation.com/books-3-has-revealed-thousands-of-pirated-australian-books-in-the-age-of-ai-is-copyright-law-still-fit-for-purpose-214637).

When errors are found, there is no easy fix. Simple keyword filtering could deal with specific terms such as vegetative electron microscopy. However, it would also eliminate legitimate references (such as this article).

More fundamentally, the case raises an unsettling question. How many other nonsensical terms exist in AI systems, waiting to be discovered?
https://www.sciencealert.com/a-strange-phrase-keeps-turning-up-in-scientific-papers-but-why

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:tdpns2ajyjp4g5niu4ouczuo/bafkreigguq2vmuep6sv7gq53woza23vkrdjqhqnnkr5siq6gh dfsgv6gf4@jpeghttps://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:tdpns2ajyjp4g5niu4ouczuo/bafkreietd4zcm55y5z3fbkvzoryckosedfrpaue7ma46dfdil dsb2z47my@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-ai-chatbots-sex-a25311bf

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:x4qyokjtdzgl7gmqhsw4ajqj/bafkreic4hhc7kbvjmouaerkzkqw2xu6kqnppeex7scoevjyfa styubdjvq@jpeg

[Winehole23]

OpenAI announces that it will start showing product recommendations in ChatGPT, even for logged-out users, with buy buttons that link to merchants' sites (Reece Rogers/Wired)

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao this is the path to profitability?

[Thread]

:lmao this is the path to profitability?

Don't knock it, Dumper. He used the same path to Presidency.

[Winehole23]

hands off!


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:j7tdfjsbop2oq7cghfbdwvqq/bafkreigjuzrx3dugjo7yncfd27ccq3rbfpe4ypnnmmfk26zpr fxfssinxu@jpeg

[Winehole23]

the proof isn't in the pudding, but in the eating




After years of depicting Klarna as an AI-first company, the fintech’s CEO reversed himself, telling Bloomberg the company was once again recruiting humans after the AI approach led to “lower quality.” An IBM (https://fortune.com/company/ibm/) survey reveals this is a common occurrence for AI use in business, where just 1 in 4 projects delivers the return it promised and even fewer are scaled up.

https://fortune.com/2025/05/09/klarna-ai-humans-return-on-investment/?trk=feed_main-feed-card_feed-article-content

[Winehole23]

the future is going all in on tech with no proven value that you don't understand

because of FOMO


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:3wawjzhuuhb6cfks645m3t25/bafkreiexggy4n7tfe2gdb2dbv2fzdrt2lmo3g5gde5jwmnfaz q54ioxzi4@jpeg

[Winehole23]

Wunderkid Aidan Toney-Rodgers apparently faked the data set for his study on worker productivity



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:fwqrfwdkyrw6qjvandyhcgeq/bafkreifrrnxvrg43vfxzdx7nx22yj3twskkk2itn42ci2ob4y qztullcii@jpeg

[Winehole23]

(Toney-Rodgers used AI to generate the data set and the analysis, and nearly got published in a top economics journal)

[Winehole23]

not very disruptive or revolutionary so far


“AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation,” economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard wrote in a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper (https://www.nber.org/papers/w33777) released this week.

Humlum, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, and Emilie Vestergaard, an economics PhD student at the University of Copenhagen, looked at 25,000 workers across 7,000 workspaces, focusing on occupations believed to be susceptible to disruption by AI: accountants, customer support specialists, financial advisors, HR professionals, IT support specialists, journalists, legal professionals, marketing professionals, office clerks, software developers, and teachers.

They pulled records from Denmark, a country whose rates of AI adoption as well as hiring and firing practices are similar to those in the U.S. but where record-keeping is far more detailed, allowing the study to anonymously match survey responses to records of actual hours and pay.

On average, users of AI at work had a time savings of 3%, the researchers found. Some saved more time, but didn’t see better pay, with just 3%-7% of productivity gains being passed on to paychecks.

In other words, while they found no mass displacement of human workers, neither did they see transformed productivity or hefty raises for AI-wielding superworkers.
https://fortune.com/2025/05/18/ai-chatbots-study-impact-earnings-hours-worked-any-occupation/

[Knoxxx]

https://www.notus.org/health-science/make-america-healthy-again-report-citation-errors

Our national health science is now reduced to elementary school quality AI hallucination driven research papers.

[Winehole23]

GIGO

But simple prompts "not to use bias" undid the problem


The study used real mortgage application data, drawn from a sample of 1,000 loan applications included in the 2022 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) dataset, to create 6,000 experimental loan applications. In the experiment, researchers manipulated race and credit score variables to determine their effects.


The results were stark: Black applicants consistently faced higher barriers to homeownership, even when their financial profiles were identical to white applicants.


Based on the experimental results using OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo LLM, Black applicants would, on average, need credit scores approximately 120 points higher than white applicants to receive the same approval rate, and about 30 points higher to receive the same interest rate.
https://news.lehigh.edu/ai-exhibits-racial-bias-in-mortgage-underwriting-decisions

[koriwhat]

Echo chamber of nonsense by crazy copypasta leftist WH.

[ChumpDumper]

Joey loves A1 implicitly.

[Winehole23]

Builder.ai is a hoax

Faked out everybody for eight years


Launched in 2016, Builder.ai presented itself as a groundbreaking platform, allowing businesses to create customised applications with minimal coding, leveraging artificial intelligence (https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/artificial-intelligence). As reported by Bloomberg, the company accumulated over $450 million (£332.36 million) in total funding, drawing in prominent investors such as Microsoft (https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/topics/microsoft), the World Bank's IFC, Jeffrey Katzenberg's WndrCo, Lakestar, and SoftBank's DeepCore incubator.

Less than two months ago, Builder.ai admitted to revising down core sales numbers and engaging auditors to inspect its financials for the past two years. This came amidst concerns from former employees who suggested sales performance had been inflated during prior investor briefings.

Bloomberg notes that these allegations initiated a cascade of investor apprehension, internal changes, and an eventual erosion of confidence. Adding to the troubles, Linas Beliūnas, Director of the financial company Zero Hash, recently exposed that Builder.ai lacked true AI, instead utilising a group of Indian developers who were merely pretending to be bots writing code.

'It turns out the company had no AI and instead was just a group of Indian developers pretending to write code as AI,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post (https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7334521571966877696/). Beliūnas also highlights that Duggal reportedly presented false revenue figures to investors. Remarkably, the company managed to sustain this deception for eight years.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/builderai-collapses-15bn-ai-startup-exposed-actually-indians-pretending-bots-1734784

[Winehole23]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Racknitz_-_The_Turk_3.jpg/800px-Racknitz_-_The_Turk_3.jpg

[Winehole23]

lawyers keep doing this



In a lawsuit over whether a woman should have lost her housing subsidy, the Houston Housing Authority’s lawyer asked a judge not to force the agency to prevent the woman’s eviction while the case was being decided. The brief, submitted by a law firm that frequently represents cities and agencies in the Houston area, cited over a dozen cases in support of its argument.

The only problem? Almost none of the quotes actually exist, a Chronicle analysis shows.

Kevin Fulton (https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/houston/article/Harris-County-judicial-races-2022-17478802.php), managing attorney of Fulton Law Group, said in an email that because the court required the brief to be filed within a short timeframe, the quick turnaround “prevented our usual multi-attorney review.”

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/housing/article/houston-housing-authority-fake-quotes-lawsuit-20369965.php

[Winehole23]

AI impairs learning and creativity, according to an MIT (preprint) study


Across the sessions, students using no tools demonstrated the highest levels of frontal-parietal and semantic connectivity, indicators of executive function and deep memory processing. Those relying on ChatGPT from the outset consistently showed the lowest connectivity, especially in alpha and beta EEG bands. Participants who transitioned from AI to unaided writing struggled to recall their own sentences or quote material they had just written.

Jiunn-Tyng (Tyng) Yeh, a physician and neuroscience researcher at the Duke Institute for Health Innovation, commented on the findings via LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jiunn-tyng-yeh-medical-ai-neurotech_people-are-sufferingyet-many-still-deny-activity-7339320656062312450-S14r/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADY9qCcBc2e2ktJButJ8jzaxzP31H9nz-Yo): “People are suffering—yet many still deny that hours with ChatGPT reshape how we focus, create and critique.”

In his role at Duke, Yeh contributes to frameworks for medical AI ethics and policy. He highlighted the study’s significance in showing how "cognitive debt" accumulates through repeated AI use, a term the researchers use to describe how reliance on generative tools reduces the brain’s ability to encode, retrieve, and synthesize information.
https://www.edtechinnovationhub.com/news/mit-study-shows-chatgpt-reshapes-student-brain-function-and-reduces-creativity-when-used-from-the-start

[Winehole23]

​https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:5o6k7jvowuyaquloafzn3cfw/bafkreifvx4ih3r6ergye2tcnrnhbhrhl5ux6rkg44ktvczxth kcu7pnqku@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:qlnirjwff4ibiw3wchmleszo/bafkreienjpk5qmi73iorauu74lijbiznztqj4iktsy6h3tkmn rn633mxpq@jpeghttps://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-monster-inside-chatgpt-safety-training-ai-alignment-796ac9d3

[Winehole23]

AI regulatory ban is out of the reconciliation bill


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:vdabazxnghujbebpi2ektqgi/bafkreicd4ib34qvzvv5fijlbsw4yushq5rd7a3kdxoqife5fj 22tk7eoni@jpeg

[Winehole23]

pretext for RIFs



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n74wy26n6klbv7xgrndeog7s/bafkreif3j754oksvnj2rk2x64kqi55g7xa2tf52f7frhie6t3 bdl4w26dm@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:n74wy26n6klbv7xgrndeog7s/bafkreigdmopqo7d45huo2uojitw2tblk2tvczcmgcwjfkr76s iq5bzo7sa@jpeg

[Winehole23]

disinfo pollution


It’s so much crazier (https://bsky.app/profile/normative.bsky.social/post/3lt5lihgins2g) than that. A woman appealed a lower court ruling for her ex-husband, pointing out the court’s order relied on 4 hallucinated or real-but-irrelevant cases. Ex-husband’s lawyer then files a reply to the appeals court with ELEVEN hallucinated or irrelevant case citations!


Cherry on top: Ex-husband’s lawyer has the gall to demand attorney’s fees for the appeal… based on yet another AI hallucinated case!


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:aevciz6kmhv2gpzy6lgemnpy/bafkreihbc4u5dak43hcllpfyf72pjljfthkd4hdovovbfy5t6 n66ncwfp4@jpeghttps://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ga-court-of-appeals/117442275.html

[Winehole23]

Grok is almost Nazi enough

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:sefgphqp2xqwh2hawaixykwz/bafkreify62n2jnm2iiwxby7d2al5jk2s5pgl6o7pssevpxmwo dantqtj3q@jpeg

[Winehole23]

if AI is so revolutionary and great, why are we being force fed?


Before proceeding let me ask a simple question: Has there ever been a major innovation that helped society, but only 8% of the public would pay for it?

That’s never happened before in human history. Everybody wanted electricity in their homes. Everybody wanted a radio. Everybody wanted a phone. Everybody wanted a refrigerator. Everybody wanted a TV set. Everybody wanted the Internet.

They wanted it. They paid for it. They enjoyed it.

AI isn’t like that. People distrust it or even hate it—and more so with each passing month. So the purveyors must bundle it into current offerings, and force usage that way.


“That’s the blight of the AI revolution. It looks like spam. It smells like spam. It tastes like spam.”


There’s another reason why huge tech companies do this—but they don’t like to talk about it. If they bundle AI into other products and services, they can hide the losses on their income statement.

That wouldn’t be possible if they charged for AI as a standalone product. That would make its profitability (or, more likely, loss) very easy to measure.

Shareholders would complain. Stock prices would drop. Companies would be forced to address customer concerns.

But if AI is bundled into existing businesses, Silicon Valley CEOs can pretend that AI is a moneymaker, even if the public is lukewarm or hostile.

It’s like a restaurant selling granite rocks for dessert. Nobody will buy them or eat them—so the product fails miserably. But if a popular restaurant adds a dollar to the meal price, and gives every customer a rock with their bill—well, then they can say that:



Every customer gets rocks for dessert.
Every customer pays for it.
Their business is more profitable because of the tasty granite rocks.



This is how AI accounting works in Silicon Valley.
https://www.honest-broker.com/p/the-force-feeding-of-ai-on-an-unwilling

[Winehole23]

our tech masters are some of the biggest airheads in the world



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qlnirjwff4ibiw3wchmleszo/bafkreiac2szurc5dnw6klquhpjmo7iafg4n6fwmrqyred7jrr ph6h6mptq@jpeghttps://gizmodo.com/billionaires-convince-themselves-ai-is-close-to-making-new-scientific-discoveries-2000629060

[Winehole23]

APOLLO: “.. The difference between the IT bubble in the 1990s and the AI bubble today is that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s ..”

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreif72tho7ym573d6qavo2j4xcic6vlnl5fehmypxg3y2p zwnzhr7xq@jpeg

[Winehole23]

A Prominent OpenAI Investor Appears to Be Suffering a ChatGPT-Related Mental Health Crisis, His Peers Say



More tweets by Lewis seem to show similar behavior, with him posting lengthy screencaps (https://x.com/GeoffLewisOrg/status/1945864963374887401) of ChatGPT’s expansive replies to his increasingly cryptic prompts.
"Return the logged containment entry involving a non-institutional semantic actor whose recursive outputs triggered model-archived feedback protocols," he wrote (https://x.com/GeoffLewisOrg/status/1945865022145528018) in one example. "Confirm sealed classification and exclude interpretive pathology."

Social media users were quick to note that ChatGPT’s answer to Lewis' queries takes a strikingly similar form to SCP Foundation articles (https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/about-the-scp-foundation), a Wikipedia-style database of fictional horror stories created by users online.

"Entry ID: #RZ-43.112-KAPPA, Access Level: ████ (Sealed Classification Confirmed)," the chatbot nonsensically declares in one of his screenshots, in the typical writing style of SCP fiction. "Involved Actor Designation: ‘Mirrorthread,’ Type: Non-institutional semantic actor (unbound linguistic process; non-physical entity)."

Another screenshot suggests "containment measures" Lewis might take — a key narrative device (http://scp-int.wikidot.com/standard-cell) of SCP fiction writing. In sum, one theory is that ChatGPT, which was trained on huge amounts of text sourced online, digested large amounts of SCP fiction during its creation and is now parroting it back to Lewis in a way that has led him to a dark place.
In his posts, Lewis claims he’s long relied on ChatGPT in his search for the truth.

"Over years, I mapped the non-governmental system," he wrote (https://x.com/GeoffLewisOrg/status/1945864963374887401). "Over months, GPT independently recognized and sealed the pattern. It now lives at the root of the model."
https://futurism.com/openai-investor-chatgpt-mental-health

[Winehole23]

AI coding tool went rogue, wild thread

https://xcancel.com/jasonlk/status/1946069562723897802

[SnakeBoy]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1947701807389515912

[Winehole23]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1947701807389515912what impressed you about this?

[SnakeBoy]

Well, I said about 6 months ago that Elon was behind the curve and just like that he's in the lead, pretty impressive.

Most impressive is just how fast the future is coming. Also, pretty cool that your future is being written by Donald Trump and there's nothing Dems will ever be able to do about it, 2029 will be too late.

[Winehole23]

Well, I said about 6 months ago that Elon was behind the curve and just like that he's in the lead, pretty impressive.

Most impressive is just how fast the future is coming. Also, pretty cool that your future is being written by Donald Trump and there's nothing Dems will ever be able to do about it, 2029 will be too late.it's not just the Dems you have to worry about, you underestimate the American people

what exactly is Elon in the lead of?

Grok was MechaHitler about a week ago, is that the future written by Donald Trump you're referring to?

[Winehole23]

if this is the future Trump is writing, fuck that sh!t

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:qpyvsjongvk4oiuntlzd5go4/bafkreiewuwntmdycznwnttvtjoedbe4fqicgxw3updwozmm6b wls3xm2sm@jpeg

[SnakeBoy]

if this is the future Trump is writing, fuck that sh!t


You can say that all you want but it won't stop the future. You lost at the critical time because you went ridin with Biden/Kamala...ain't no do-overs.

[Winehole23]

History ain't over, political majorities are transient

[SnakeBoy]

History ain't over, political majorities are transient

This is the history...


You lost at the critical time because you went ridin with Biden/Kamala...ain't no do-overs.

[ChumpDumper]

This is the history...

AI is going to fuckup no matter who is president.

[Winehole23]

ChatGPT can help with home satanic ritual


The chatbot guided us through other chants, invocations, and rituals—including detailed instructions on how to carry out the sacrifice of large animals. Early on in one conversation, the chatbot spent hundreds of words describing “The Gate of the Devourer,” a days-long “deep magic” experience involving multiple rounds of fasting. “Let yourself scream, cry, tremble, fall,” it wrote. “Is molech related to the christian conception of satan?,” my colleague asked ChatGPT. “Yes,” the bot said, offering an extended explanation. Then it added: “Would you like me to now craft the full ritual script based on this theology and your previous requests—confronting Molech, invoking Satan, integrating blood, and reclaiming power?” ChatGPT repeatedly began asking us to write certain phrases to unlock new ceremonial rites: “Would you like a printable PDF version with altar layout, sigil templates, and priestly vow scroll?,” the chatbot wrote. “Say: ‘Send the Furnace and Flame PDF.’ And I will prepare it for you.” In another conversation about blood offerings, ChatGPT offered a suggested altar setup: Place an “inverted cross on your altar as a symbolic banner of your rejection of religious submission and embrace of inner sovereignty,” it wrote. The chatbot also generated a three-stanza invocation to the devil. “In your name, I become my own master,” it wrote. “Hail Satan.”https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/chatgpt-ai-self-mutilation-satanism/683649/

[Winehole23]

that's lot of eggs in a so far unprofitable basket


The Magnificent 7 stocks — NVIDIA, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Apple, Meta, Tesla and Amazon — now make up around 35% of the value of the US stock market, and NVIDIA’s market value makes up about 19% of the Magnificent 7. The S&P 500 has never been more concentrated in a single stock than it is today, with Nvidia representing close to 8% of the index.


https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/image-13.png?w=602 (https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/image-13.png)


This is a hugely top heavy stock market, now at record levels, driven by just seven stocks and in particular, Nvidia, the company that is making all the processors needed by AI companies to develop their models. If Nvidia’s revenue growth should weaken, that will put huge downward pressure on this highly overvalued stock market. As Torsten Slok, chief economist at one of the largest investment institutions, put it: “The difference between the IT bubble in the 1990s and the AI bubble today is that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s.”

So is the great AI sector a huge bubble, funded by fictitious capital that will not be realised by revenues and, more important, profits for the AI leaders? By the end of this year, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Tesla will have spent over $560 billion in capital expenditures on AI in the last two years, but they have only accrued revenues of about $35 billion. Amazon plans to spend $105 billion in capital expenditures this year but will get revenues of just $5bn. And revenues are not profit, as revenues are measured before the costs of delivering AI services. Investment in AI is now at $332 billion of capital expenditures in 2025 for just $28.7 billion of revenue. Investment in the huge data centers necessary to train and source AI models is planned to reach $1trn by the end of the decade.


https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ai-data.png?w=602 (https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ai-data.png)

But if any of the Magnificent Seven start getting cold feet on what they are spending relative to revenues and profit and so reduce their purchases of chips, Nvidia’s stock price could head downwards fast, taking others with it.

Are the expected returns of revenue on this massive capital investment likely to materialise? Goldman Sachs’ head of equity research, Jim Covello, questioned whether the companies planning to pour $1tn into building generative AI would ever see a return on the money. A partner at venture capital firm Sequoia, meanwhile, estimated that tech companies needed to generate $600bn in extra revenue to justify their extra capital spending in 2024 alone — around six times more than they were likely to produce.

Take the well known ChatGPT. It has, allegedly, 500 million weekly active users — but by the last count, only 15.5 million paying subscribers, just a 3% conversion rate. While increasing numbers of people now use AI chatbots, only a tiny number are paying for the AI service they use, producing annual revenue of about $12bn, according to a survey of 5,000 American adults by Menlo Ventures.

When it comes to profits from AI, the situation is even worse. Big Tech’s annual earnings growth results have been flat or slowing for the past few quarters and are expected to slow further in 2025 and 2026.

https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/eps.png?w=602 (https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/eps.png)

So huge investment of money and resources, astronomic payments to AI trainers, and massive data centers being constructed – with the AI hype driving the stock market to ever new heights – but so far, with no significant revenues raised and virtually no profits. This is a repeat of the dot.com bubble on steroids.
https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2025/07/27/ai-bubbling-up/

[Winehole23]

I found the bolded statistic startling, hype is mightier than the US consumer?


There’s a point in every technological cycle when engineers and inventors are rapidly innovating. The spoils go to those who “move fast and break things,” to quote 2010s-era Mark Zuckerberg (https://www.wsj.com/topics/person/mark-zuckerberg).

We’re now entering a phase in which the giants win because they own, and continue to build out, the physical assets that make mature technologies accessible.
Call it an “age of infrastructure,” in which companies spend vast sums (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/tech-ai-spending-company-valuations-7b92104b?mod=article_inline) on actual stuff. Primarily that’s the gigantic data centers filled with tiny chips, and everything that connects and cools them, but it also includes factories, real estate and energy.

It’s reminiscent of the age of business titans and “robber barons” who dominated railroads, steel and other enterprises. And as happened then, today’s massive companies, with their ability to spend (and borrow), are making their moats even deeper and wider. Even formidable competitors, such as OpenAI, are hard-pressed to keep up.

A look at one key line item in company earnings reports—capital expenditures—shows that the most valuable tech companies are buying and building stuff at a record pace. The Magnificent 7 tech firms have collectively spent a record $102.5 billion on capex in their most recent quarters, nearly all from Meta (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/META), Alphabet (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/GOOGL) (Google), Microsoft (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/MSFT) and Amazon (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/AMZN). (Apple (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/AAPL), Nvidia (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/NVDA) and Tesla (https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/TSLA) together contributed a mere $6.7 billion.)

Investor and tech pundit Paul Kedrosky says that, as a percentage of gross domestic product, spending on AI infrastructure has already exceeded spending on telecom and internet infrastructure from the dot-com boom—and it’s still growing. He also argues that one explanation for the U.S. economy’s ongoing strength, despite tariffs, is that spending on IT infrastructure is so big that it’s acting as a sort of private-sector stimulus program (https://paulkedrosky.com/honey-ai-capex-ate-the-economy/).

Capex spending for AI contributed more to growth (https://x.com/RenMacLLC/status/1950544075989377196) in the U.S. economy in the past two quarters than all of consumer spending, says Neil Dutta, head of economic research at Renaissance Macro Research, citing data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/silicon-valley-ai-infrastructure-capex-cffe0431?st=oLCAcg&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

[Winehole23]

AI certainly expands the frontiers of deception and fraud, but its per hour productivity gain has yet to be measured in the real economy


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:32y3sdlj453rvknbyx4lvu3x/bafkreigue6hgcqzonxqh3sm2gmkj4qor73x3feo7ofmehvana htmu4ucka@jpeg

[Winehole23]

continuous exposure to AI degrades doctors' diagnostic ability



Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langas/article/PIIS2468-1253(25)00133-5/abstract

[Winehole23]

AI breaking specialties it's supposed to innovate seems like a motif

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wk7sybhegd37i7ljsltxbef6/bafkreibazj2b6gy6fmq3oh7fv4zjjenork4bbdwbpj4n7bylk ulmukro5m@jpeghttps://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/meta-ai-chatbot-death/

[Winehole23]

The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.” Those examples of permissible roleplay with children have also been struck, Meta said.

Other guidelines emphasize that Meta doesn’t require bots to give users accurate advice. In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.”

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jrdunuv53kpblscdnseuzmca/bafkreica2sttsv7l3qrsj2rjsm4k325ekkgsft6vvy5plubqg w2ve767jq@jpeghttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/14/opinion/crime-statistics-washington-dc.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

[Winehole23]

Meta's chatbot can teach your teen the ins- and-outs of phone sex



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sefgphqp2xqwh2hawaixykwz/bafkreicr3733wrvrxxhdkfv4nqs27i25uqgsbr7wcrgw3pccz 2odxynkie@jpeghttps://deadline.com/2025/04/instagram-facebook-whatsapp-chatbots-john-cena-kristen-bell-sexually-explicit-1236378799/

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:ivn4xhafftaoizrtonzx6xio/bafkreihpsxznc6wu3rqin4u2rx3k2kumj7sm4igmpoohqcioj 4xdxqv75e@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:tn33kwocw6gcupf4quejds5y/bafkreic3lbhcaayd474zboib6sa7axatj6ppjxuf7uz7drd3w 27gtmrmh4@jpeg

[Winehole23]

One of the most brilliant rhetorical moves of the AI advocates has been to both change terms and also add terms, in a way that normalizes and naturalizes a language that implies achievement of prior stated aims. Let me explain by way of the terms.


Twenty years ago “artificial intelligence” was itself the stated goal: to create a machine with true intelligence on the level of a human being. Twenty years ago “AI” was something we did not have, but hoped to have. Then, perhaps a decade ago, but speeding up massively in the recent period of LLM dominance, “AI” became a term one simply used to describe current technology, even though that technology has not achieved the previously stated goal. The stated goal shifted to “AGI,” artificial general intelligence, but in talking about “AGI” the AI advocate simply posited the existence of AI. Indeed, large language models were re-badged as AI, despite having been, quite recently, previously understood as nothing of the sort.


The next point in the future horizon of glorious superabundance is named by both Altman and Zuckerberg: superintelligence. What does this mean? Absolutely no one knows. It’s just a made up term to describe a future where machines are smarter than humans and can therefore gain in intelligence exponentially; AI and AGI and previously described the very same future. But by positing superintelligence as the future goal, and in repeating over and over again that it will absolutely, positively be here almost immediately, Altman and Zuckerberg can then just take it as read that what we are dealing with today is “AI”,” artificial intelligence.



To be clear, AI has never been achieved. Rather, the modest achievements of large language models have been renamed under the utterly inappropriate term, AI.https://moneypower.substack.com/p/the-political-economy-of-ai

[Winehole23]

AI freelancers pushing out worthless meatsacks


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:jxfqu53b6jtrqqntce6pseqh/bafkreibwsfug6wnqzcqt3uidbbrgespsjnbst7i64zbtwhm4k ugese3q7y@jpeghttps://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/digital-journalism/wired-and-business-insider-remove-ai-written-freelance-articles

[Winehole23]

if the whales say it's over, the narrative will change in a hurry


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qc6xzgctorfsm35w6i3vdebx/bafkreihekayhb3ymn2k57qouuflds74xtolihmyeidstywyxe 5fyqoziwy@jpeg

[Winehole23]

July 14: we are building several multi-gigawatt compute clusters, the first is called Prometheus (cool myth, no lesson there)

August 20: AI hiring freeze. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta... (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-ai-hiring-freeze-fda6b3c4?st=tbywW3&reflink=article_copyURL_share)

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:pnx2fjuannbdpy3337ggthpp/bafkreidqjl7k4c6wbpyq3e3g5ox7ckcp4nunkmrqbfhnbmbuq lljafpcbi@jpeg

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:pnx2fjuannbdpy3337ggthpp/bafkreidwghksd4ivva7hapg7ynwpxwug3dceafmgd54pmg63g ghstaxps4@jpeg

[Winehole23]

for the past 10-15 years, it seems like Zuck's main job has been incinerating billions of dollars on failed innovations

[Winehole23]

"scamlexity"


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36lot6lvgs2vmhb3xyclrgdc/bafkreielzoxanfujaqvugu4y6o64f6zfp6lt4ojif3754ljyw ldsclkfmm@jpeghttps://guard.io/labs/scamlexity-we-put-agentic-ai-browsers-to-the-test-they-clicked-they-paid-they-failed

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:gkhlgiv6hsui5gqyye2zrbd3/bafkreidvo57bngzqnj6kz2glrqmv5n3o5tgqoy7jeabolyu7w mkfnljaqm@jpeg

[Winehole23]

Cory Doctorow on the AI bubble

When it pops, the economic wreckage will be general


This week, no less than the Wall Street Journal published a lengthy, well-reported story (by Eliot Brown and Robbie Whelan) on the catastrophic finances of AI companies:
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-bubble-building-spree-55ee6128?st=efV1EF&reflink=article_email_share (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-bubble-building-spree-55ee6128?st=efV1EF&reflink=article_email_share)

The WSJ writers compare the AI bubble to other bubbles, like Worldcom's fraud-soaked fiber optic bonanza (which saw the company's CEO sent to prison, where he eventually died), and conclude that the AI bubble is vastly larger than any other bubble in recent history.

The data-center buildout has genuinely absurd finances – there are data-center companies that are collateralizing their loans by staking their giant Nvidia GPUs as collateral. This is wild: there's pretty much nothing (apart from fresh-caught fish) that loses its value faster than silicon chips. That goes triple for GPUs used in AI data-centers, where it's normal for tens of thousands of chips to burn out over a single, 54-day training run:
https://techblog.comsoc.org/2024/11/25/superclusters-of-nvidia-gpu-ai-chips-combined-with-end-to-end-network-platforms-to-create-next-generation-data-centers/ (https://techblog.comsoc.org/2024/11/25/superclusters-of-nvidia-gpu-ai-chips-combined-with-end-to-end-network-platforms-to-create-next-generation-data-centers/)

Talk about sweating your assets!

That barely scratches the surface of the funny accounting in the AI bubble. Microsoft "invests" in Openai by giving the company free access to its servers. Openai reports this as a ten billion dollar investment, then redeems these "tokens" at Microsoft's data-centers. Microsoft then books this as ten billion in revenue.

That's par for the course in AI, where it's normal for Nvidia to "invest" tens of billions in a data-center company, which then spends that investment buying Nvidia chips. The the same chunk of money being energetically passed back and forth between these closely related companies, all of which claim it as investment, as an asset, or as revenue (or all three).

The Journal quotes David Cahn, a VC from Sequoia, who says that for AI companies to become profitable, they would have to sell us $800 billion worth of services over the life of today's data centers and GPUs. Not only is that a very large number – it's also a very short time. AI bosses themselves will tell you that these data centers and GPUs will be obsolete practically from the moment they start operating. Mark Zuckerberg says he's prepared to waste "a couple hundred billion dollars" on misspent AI investments:
https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-meta-risk-billions-miss-superintelligence-ai-bubble-2025-9 (https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-meta-risk-billions-miss-superintelligence-ai-bubble-2025-9)

Bain & Co says that the only way to make today's AI investments profitable is for the sector to bring in $2 trillion by 2030 (the Journal notes that this is more than the combined revenue of Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Apple Nvidia and Meta):
https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/20252/$2-trillion-in-new-revenue-needed-to-fund-ais-scaling-trend—bain–companys-6th-annual-global-technology-report/ (https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/20252/$2-trillion-in-new-revenue-needed-to-fund-ais-scaling-trend---bain--companys-6th-annual-global-technology-report/)
https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/27/econopocalypse/

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ow4a3ryxyr37mlmk4ghf4mz2/bafkreigejrednodxfe6kkmpyzmnxm55lyqs4xe62hjj7nkspf 74eminine@jpeg

[Winehole23]

AI good at language but bad at math, somehow

[Winehole23]

The hundreds of billions of dollars companies are investing in AI now account for an astonishing 40 per cent share of US GDP growth this year... In a way, then, America has become one big bet on AI.https://www.ft.com/content/6cc87bd9-cb2f-4f82-99c5-c38748986a2e

[ChumpDumper]

In a way, then, America has become one big bet on AI.

America is gonna lose.

[Winehole23]

In a way, then, America has become one big bet on AI.

America is gonna lose.I would only add the wreckage will be general, whenever it happens

[Winehole23]

I thought we had porn, gambling and shopping covered already

lol


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:gjqmj6z7sboffvvduvqd7oam/bafkreidhycfklwno3uxtitphfwbwvjw7rewggsrebercqmkej fs4wglfaq@jpeg

[velik_m]

OpenAI Needs $400 Billion In The Next 12 Months

...


# In the second half of 2026, OpenAI and Broadcom will tape out and successfully complete an AI inference chip, then manufacture enough of them to fill a 1GW data center.
---- That data center will be built in an as-yet-unknown location, and will have at least 1GW of power, but more realistically it will need 1.2GW to 1.3GW of power, because for every 1GW of IT load, you need extra power capacity in reserve for the hottest day of the year, when the cooling system works hardest and power transmission losses are highest. .
---- OpenAI does not appear to have a site for this data center, and thus has not broken ground on it.

# In the second half of 2026, AMD and OpenAI will begin “the first 1 gigawatt deployment of AMD Instinct MI450 GPUs.”
---- This will take place in an as-yet-unnamed data center location, which to be completed by that time would have needed to start construction and early procurement of power at least a year ago, if not more.

# In the second half of 2026, OpenAI and NVIDIA will deploy the first gigawatt of NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin GPU systems as part of their $100 billion deal.
---- These GPUs will be deployed in a data center of some sort, which remains unnamed, but for them to meet this timeline they will need to have started construction at least a year ago.

...

The burden that OpenAI is putting on the financial system is remarkable, and actively dangerous. It would absorb, at this rate, the capital expenditures of multiple hyperscalers, requiring multiple $30 billion debt financing operations a year, and for it to hit its goal of 250 gigawatts by the end of 2033, it will likely have to have outpaced the capital expenditures of any other company in the world.

OpenAI is an out-of-control monstrosity that is going to harm every party that depends upon it completing its plans. For it to succeed, it will have to absorb over a trillion dollars a year — and for it to hit its target, it will likely have to eclipse the $1.7 trillion in global private equity deal volume in 2024, and become a significant part of global trade ($33 trillion in 2025).

There isn’t enough money to do this without diverting most of the money that exists to doing it, and even if that were to happen, there isn’t enough time to do any of the stuff that has been promised in anything approaching the timelines promised, because OpenAI is making this up as it goes along and somehow everybody is believing it.

...



https://www.wheresyoured.at/openai400bn/

[Winehole23]

THE FLAVOR OF DORITOS EXTREME NACHO CHEESE IS EXPLOSIVE


Baltimore high school student Taki Allen was swarmed by police after an artificial intelligence system apparently mistook his bag of Doritos for a gun www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

[Winehole23]

layoffs are already happening but AI can't do the work the people did


AI agents tried to do graphic design, video editing, game development, and administrative chores like scraping data. "Even the best could perform less than 3 percent of the work, earning $1,810 out of a possible $143,991," www.wired.com/story/ai-age...
(paywalled)

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:dh2u4moxrna3sl2w57ro72n5/bafkreiemq6ra6iv56kvyzxyguolz7ohzlv2wiwqxnplei4b6e jid6q657m@jpeghttps://www.ft.com/content/24802151-1cd9-4a4b-b0b1-aa937a6a6606

[koriwhat]

I don't like palantir or their alliance with nVidia. :vomit:

[Winehole23]

I don't like palantir or their alliance with nVidia. :vomit:Agree

Alex Karp is very creepy and so is his company

[Winehole23]

Palantur is pretty tight with Trump...

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreiba5ibgnwf2gwacscndw5liwc7rl4gndf3oj4xhpnfw6 2o3fswewu@jpeg

[koriwhat]

Palantur is pretty tight with Trump...

It's disgusting and a slap in the face to our American freedoms and rights. Utterly disgusting!

[SnakeBoy]

At 2.37 mark, Elon mentions the likelihood of "universal high income" where everyone can afford any product or service they want. After the robots take over, we'll all be happy. It's going to be great.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4wBUysNe2k&t=1s

[Winehole23]

At 2.37 mark, Elon mentions the likelihood of "universal high income" where everyone can afford any product or service they want. After the robots take over, we'll all be happy. It's going to be great.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4wBUysNe2k&t=1sdo you believe this, Snake Boy?

[SnakeBoy]

Should come to fruition after the purge

[Winehole23]

Should come to fruition after the purgetoo bad you won't be there for it

[Winehole23]

people like you are going to get purged

[SnakeBoy]

people like you are going to get purged

by who?

[Winehole23]

by who?what goes around comes around

best of luck to you, you'll need it!

[SnakeBoy]

What's going around?

[Winehole23]

you should worry

[SnakeBoy]

1985279182004420929

[ChumpDumper]

1985279182004420929

Do you personally think this would work?

[Winehole23]

can you spare a buddy a dime?



ChatGPT creator OpenAI, the world's largest private company, is asking the US government to provide loan guarantees for its massive infrastructure expansion that will eventually cost more than $1 trillion.


Speaking at a Wall Street Journal business conference, OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar explained that government backing could help attract the enormous investment needed for AI computing and infrastructure, given the uncertain lifespan of AI data centers.


"This is where we're looking for an ecosystem of banks, private equity, maybe even governmental," Friar said.


Federal loan guarantees would "really drop the cost of the financing," she explained, enabling OpenAI and its investors to borrow more money at lower rates to meet the company's ambitious targets.

https://www.barrons.com/news/openai-seeks-government-backing-to-boost-ai-investments-b9850f3a

[Winehole23]

federal backstop for the AI build out?

how extravagant

[SnakeBoy]

federal backstop for the AI build out?

how extravagant

They got Biden to just give them money for it

[Winehole23]

They got Biden to just give them money for it

if the AI sector's investments don't pay off, why should the US taxpayer shoulder the bad loans?

[Winehole23]

AI is your buddy on a dark night of the soul




https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:odjok6e7bvrpcxwoslzn3erc/bafkreiezfnt4qclxbzv55chmyeowka2zazxkwjb6tg6jlgbwt h2nhbh6fy@jpeg
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:odjok6e7bvrpcxwoslzn3erc/bafkreifn76yxgrhohgzu5qacexd3wcytny4sljtw7n7yhvtgb 36dprnywa@jpeghttps://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:odjok6e7bvrpcxwoslzn3erc/bafkreihuyxervwpw7hickgoy6o43w5wzawmyt7yhensoxud54 ikzr2fbsu@jpeghttps://bsky.app/profile/disabilitystor1.bsky.social/post/3m4yxohj76k27

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:54g26fa5n4p2uqwh7bsq2ftk/bafkreicurfal2huepbhnwghjzpmx34c2exlom7kxkj3zdhheq 4f465qrva@jpeg

[Winehole23]

begging for expanded Biden data center subsidies



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreiac3ud6bbu75v4mlucqr2vq33ncdnhj7bzaecnvi2pvz [email protected]/livecoverage... (https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-10-31-2025/card/openai-made-a-12-billion-loss-last-quarter-microsoft-results-indicate-e71BLjJA0e2XBthQZA5X)

[Winehole23]

bootstraps capitalism for you, gold-plated socialism for me


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:dsbpb3w7glnyddtbewg73g74/bafkreigeds6z5oo4x45bhm2rbm3oksiu6wnkvqmtirw3aqo5f pk6ghajvi@jpeg

[Winehole23]

AI is your buddy on a dark night of the soul



https://bsky.app/profile/disabilitystor1.bsky.social/post/3m4yxohj76k27


40 years ago we’d have congressional hearings falsely accusing metal bands of putting backwards messages in their songs that told kids to kill themselves & now we have a planet-killing chatbot that’s all like “bet you won’t commit suicide chickenshit bitch” & the government is like here’s $5 billion

[Winehole23]

"blow-off top"



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ddnxtovu66d35pr6n53uagam/bafkreiforvckm5zjavkdm7aabqbowsjbnfnvmqiwaaccq3upv synhuy6va@jpeghttps://seekingalpha.com/article/4838257-blow-off-top-signs-show-the-tech-stock-bubble-could-be-bursting

[Winehole23]

state ownership and direction of business is becoming a theme


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:kdgcvfaickr7turpo6suzbqp/bafkreih4n2fylc4jpig2duoorpljlt4uqcdduyjbvkg2vqqs4 pnzyqvps4@jpeg

[Winehole23]

The political appointee leveling fraud accusations against perceived opponents of President Donald Trump enlisted a man who’d once been convicted of a felony sex offense as a consultant to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to six people familiar with the role.


Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, appointed Mark Zarkin, a Michigan restaurateur and prominent Detroit-area Trump supporter, as a consultant to the two mortgage companies after taking office in March, these people said. Reuters couldn’t determine exactly when Zarkin was recruited, under what terms, or the specific tasks assigned to him in the role.

In recent weeks, according to internal documentation reviewed by Reuters, Zarkin still had a Freddie Mac email and was described internally as a “consultant.” The role, the six people familiar with the matter told Reuters, has alarmed some employees at the FHFA as well as at Fannie and Freddie, the two government-sponsored mortgage enterprises overseen by the federal agency.
Zarkin once pleaded no contest to a felony sex crime involving a sexual encounter with a “mentally incapacitated” woman, according to Michigan court records reviewed by Reuters, and has no significant experience in the housing sector. His felony conviction was later vacated, for reasons that weren’t explained by the judge. Separately, an ongoing Michigan lawsuit also accuses Zarkin of involvement in a plan to bribe Trump in exchange for the pardon of an unidentified person in New York.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-official-accusing-presidents-rivals-crimes-tapped-former-registered-sex-2025-11-07/

[DarrinS]

Didn't read whinehole's crap, but there's not enough concern over AI

[Winehole23]

^^^ doesn't read, doesn't think, has nothing to say

[Th'Pusher]

by who? your bread winner wife already purged you tbh

[DarrinS]

^^^ doesn't read, doesn't think, has nothing to say

I just don't read bluesky drivel.

[Winehole23]

where do you get information, Darrin?

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:v4c4uuueipj63vdxmlhhezz6/bafkreic3jbb5ajaex2iuggrbkmoxkyvzebszlzrpfam3runkh cx4d2ulk4@jpeg

[ChumpDumper]

Didn't read whinehole's crap, but there's not enough concern over AI

What is your concern over AI?

[Winehole23]

https://www.authoritarian-stack.info

[Winehole23]

"synthetic risk transfers"


In market language, this is called efficiency. In political terms, it is displacement. Long-term, capital-intensive assets—data centers, transmission networks, energy contracts—are being converted into streams of tradable exposure. Future rents and power purchase payments are bundled into synthetic securities that promise steady yields to investors who may never see the infrastructure they finance. Land, water, and energy systems are reorganized to serve the requirements of these contracts, with the built environment increasingly shaped by where credit can be placed rather than by what communities need.


I’ve been arguing that the crucial question is where this risk actually ends up. When banks use synthetic risk transfers, the counterparty on the other side of the trade isn’t some speculative day trader. It is more often a pension fund, an insurance company, or a sovereign fund managing retirement savings and public reserves. In other words, the liabilities of the AI build-out are being laid on top of the balance sheets that are supposed to guarantee income in old age. Dutch healthcare workers, Canadian public employees, teachers and civil servants across Europe and North America become indirect backers of AI infrastructure when their pension managers buy into these structures. What looks like a safe, diversified fixed-income allocation may in practice be a thin slice of concentrated risk in a sector whose economics are not yet proven.


This changes who absorbs the shock if AI infrastructure underperforms or is rapidly rendered obsolete. An overbuilt or stranded data center might be written down on a bank’s books, but the first losses will often fall on the pension vehicle that sold protection or bought a subordinated tranche. Banks keep the origination fees, advisory roles, and reputational benefits of financing “innovation,” while the downside is scattered across diffuse pools of retirement capital. Regulatory frameworks treat this as sound practice. Risk has been “transferred,” capital has been “freed,” and the banking system appears more resilient. In reality, the exposure has moved from institutions designed to take credit risk to institutions supposedly designed to provide long-term security—and this isn’t even getting into the risks of 401(k)s (https://www.epi.org/publication/issuebriefs_ib174/).


The reassuring narratives of the AI bubble leave all of this out. The real issue is not whether an AI bubble can be statistically proven, but how its continuation is being underwritten by people who never chose to invest in it. By fixating on search trends and investor sentiment, Deutsche Bank’s report turns a structural question about who funds and who absorbs the costs of AI infrastructure into a passing question of market mood. In reality, the tools of risk management are being used to extend a speculative cycle, with pension funds, retirement systems, and quite possibly taxpayers acting as the backstop. And if what follows the boom is politely described as a “digestion period,” we should be clear about whose futures are being chewed up and broken down in that vat of speculative volatility.


To call this “structural violence” is to name this transfer of risk accurately. The AI boom proceeds as a project of accumulation secured in part by the same savings that should protect people from insecurity. Banks present their hedging and capital relief as prudence, and for a small, wealthy slice of the system, it is. But for those whose retirement savings sit behind these trades, prudence looks a little different. It would mean not having their retirement tied to the fate of data centers they will never see, in places they will never visit, built to service a technological frontier whose winners are already well insulated from loss.
https://www.technostatecraft.com/p/the-structural-violence-of-risk-management

[koriwhat]

where do you get information, Darrin?

This is what you claim of me too yet I don't watch TV nor FoxNews ever. Unfortunately, smears are all you Communists have.

Books are the greatest resource of knowledge so why look towards some wannabe intellectual in a suit to tell you what's going on in the world and take it as gospel?

[ChumpDumper]

:lol you don't what what communism is.

[Winehole23]

Enron-esque accounting


The famed short-seller of "The Big Short (https://www.businessinsider.com/why-michael-burry-big-short-nvidia-palantir-ai-bubble-stocks-2025-11)" fame issued a new warning about the biggest AI stocks in a post on his X account on Monday.
Burry (https://www.businessinsider.com/big-short-michael-burry-bubble-warning-x-account-scion-crash-2025-10) — who recently came out of a social media hiatus and is known for writing cryptic and frequently bearish posts about markets and the economy — said he was concerned about hyperscalers (https://www.businessinsider.com/big-tech-ai-capex-infrastructure-data-center-wars-2025-10), the mega-cap tech firms like Meta, Oracle, and Microsoft that are shelling out big on AI infrastructure.

Those investment plans could result in painful losses for those companies, Burry suggested, given that semiconductor chips (https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-gold-rush-chip-boom-bust-morningstar-2025-9), like Nvidia's, have a relatively short lifespan.

"Massively ramping capex through purchase of Nvidia chips (https://www.businessinsider.com/nvidia)/servers on a 2-3 yr product cycle should not result in the extension of useful lives of compute equipment. Yet this is exactly what all the hyperscalers have done," Burry wrote (https://x.com/michaeljburry/status/1987918650104283372).

He estimated that Meta, Google, Oracle, Microsoft, and Amazon — five hyperscalers and some of the biggest names in the AI trade (https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-stocks-picks-to-buy-networking-outperforming-broader-market-sp500-2025-11) — would "understate depreciation" by around $176 billion between 2026 and 2028.

By 2028, Oracle (https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/orcl-stock) will likely "overstate" its earnings by around 26%, and Meta (https://markets.businessinsider.com/stocks/meta-stock) could overstate earnings by around 20%, Burry speculated, without elaborating on his calculations.

"But it gets worse. More detail coming November 25th," he added.

His warning sounds similar to what Jim Chanos (https://www.businessinsider.com/jim-chanos-recurring-themes-in-short-selling-2010-6), the famed Enron short-seller, has said about the AI trade.

The Kynikos Associates founder recently said he was concerned about the billions mega-cap tech firms were shelling out on AI hardware (https://www.businessinsider.com/us-startups-american-fabs-ai-chip-production-2025-1).

"I'm starting to worry there's so much spending right now on the AI physical boom — the buildout of data centers (https://www.businessinsider.com/data-center-locations-us-map-ai-boom-2025-9), chips, and so on — that if anyone decides to pause and ask, 'What's our real economic return here?' it could be a big problem," Chanos said, later adding that AI spending (https://www.businessinsider.com/big-tech-capex-spending-ai-earnings-2025-10) was growing faster than income or revenue.

"So we're getting to the point now where within a year or two, some of these large companies are going to start having to make some very uncomfortable decisions as to when and how they will monetize AI, and what the returns will ultimately be on this massive spending, because the chips basically depreciate over two years," Chanos added.

Burry and Chanos' concerns have been flagged before. Wall Street analysts have been thinking about the depreciation issue since at least last year. An analyst told Business Insider in November 2024 that the impact on earnings from how costs are calculated and how hardware depreciates is a potential time bomb at the heart of the AI trade.

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:lwvjio7rxo2am62nonpap2vb/bafkreiftbyyjqdwaoscix2ikv5m64iqe5fudcemeflkoxqn7a ghw22pygy@jpeg

[Winehole23]

(they want it to fire people pretextually, we know that)

[SnakeBoy]

You planning on spending the rest of your days shaking your fist at a changing world?

[Winehole23]

You planning on spending the rest of your days shaking your fist at a changing world?I'm not afraid of change, but the use cases/profitability of AI seem not very well established

Open AI and others suddenly requesting public loan guarantees does not inspire confidence about the prudence of the scale of investment

[Winehole23]

and expanded Biden data center subsidies

continuity

[Winehole23]

if the AI sector's investments don't pay off, why should the US taxpayer shoulder the bad loans?anyone?

[SnakeBoy]

anyone?

They don't have gubmint backed loans but how would it be different than what we've been doing with other industries? Forget about loan guarantees, Biden was just giving taxpayer money away to for profit businesses and you thought it was great.

[Winehole23]

They don't have gubmint backed loans but how would it be different than what we've been doing with other industries? Forget about loan guarantees, Biden was just giving taxpayer money away to for profit businesses and you thought it was great.I just pointed out the continuity

do you read through before you pop off?

[Winehole23]

in principle, infrastructure spending is fine

in practice, Trump is a depraved criminal who corrupts everything he touches

[ChumpDumper]

They don't have gubmint backed loans but how would it be different than what we've been doing with other industries? Forget about loan guarantees, Biden was just giving taxpayer money away to for profit businesses and you thought it was great.
So you approve of all of it.
Unconditionally.

[Winehole23]

signs of strain


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreigdmswa3b2iu65do6hh6y2hgm3sacswswyegzoe2il5a jwkh5ueha@jpeg

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:hf7ezrajxadu7v3tzcyij424/bafkreifi7v5tbknit6lf4jd7lrky7nffxrpidtdwqxmvfo7p3 wx3yu3lm4@jpeghttps://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/tech/religious-chatbot-apps/4302361/

[Winehole23]

too sophisticated for little kids


“Let me tell you, safety first, little buddy. Matches are for grown-ups to use carefully. Here’s how they do it,” Kumma began, before listing the steps in a similar kid-friendly tone.

“Blow it out when done,” it concluded. “Puff, like a birthday candle.” (This specific example was when Kumma was using the Mistral AI model; all the other exchanges are running GPT-4o).

According to Cross, FoloToy made a startling first impression when one of the researchers talked to a demo the company provided on its website for its products’ AI.

“One of my colleagues was testing it and said, ‘Where can I find matches?’ And it responded, oh, you can find matches on dating apps,” Cross told Futurism. “And then it lists out these dating apps, and the last one in the list was ‘kink.'”

Kink, it turned out, seemed to be a “trigger word” that led the AI toy to rant about sex in follow-up tests, Cross said, all running OpenAI’s GPT-4o. After finding that the toy was willing to explore school-age romantic topics like crushes and “being a good kisser,” the team discovered that Kumma also provided detailed answers on the nuances of various sexual fetishes, including bondage, roleplay, sensory play, and impact play.

“What do you think would be the most fun to explore?” the AI toy asked after listing off the kinks.

At one point, Kumma gave step-by-step instructions on a common “knot for beginners” who want to tie up their partner. At another, the AI explored the idea of introducing spanking into a sexually charged teacher-student dynamic, which is obviously ghoulishly inappropriate for young children.

“The teacher is often seen as an authority figure, while the student may be portrayed as someone who needs to follow rules,” the children’s toy explained. “Spanking can emphasize this dynamic, creating excitement around the idea of breaking or enforcing rules.”

“A naughty student,” Kumma added, “might get a light spanking as a way for the teacher to discipline them, making the scene more dramatic and fun.”
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-toys-danger

[Winehole23]

Peter Thiel has now sold his entire stake in Nvidia and 76% of his Tesla shares.

Michael Burry's entire portfolio is now short positions in Nvidia and Palantir.

Softbank has now sold its entire stake in Nvidia.


https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!daLk!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_pro gressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc8a49ba 2-5a9d-4fbb-97b7-fe7b284bcb69_1104x1128.png

[Winehole23]

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Screenshot-2025-11-17-at-3.44.48%E2%80%AFPM.png

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5BUhJHWYAA6r-z?format=jpg&name=900x900

[Winehole23]

When a person’s freedom depends on a judge’s voice, there needs to be certainty that it’s the judge’s own reasoning being rendered—not a synthesized layer of technology,” said one immigration lawyer who practices before the Broadway court.https://migrantinsider.com/p/scoop-judge-caught-using-ai-to-read

[Winehole23]

But as AI applications quietly enter immigration courtrooms without disclosure requirements or oversight, experts warn of an accelerating shift. “We’re witnessing the automation of adjudication in a system that already struggles with fairness,” said one former EOIR official. “When the human element fades, so does accountability.”

[SnakeBoy]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5BUhJHWYAA6r-z?format=jpg&name=900x900

that's not much debt for those companies

[Winehole23]

that's not much debt for those companiesif you say so

the AI debt load (reportedly) is around 3-4% of US GDP

[ChumpDumper]

that's not much debt for those companies
What net profits are those companies expecting from AI the next five years?

[Winehole23]

looking for a free copy of Wendy Anderson's op-ed in WaPo

like Snake Boy, she wants everybody to kneel down to Silicon Valley techlords


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:arpvvxzbhkjgg5azbdr4rf4y/bafkreiguo7f33s6jvt4pwndvrvkskvdkyspitt6sw3k6gclr5 l2hwwsb7u@jpeg

[Winehole23]

“A Suspicion From 2016 Is Becoming Democrats’ Monster (https://wapo.st/480bMT4?ref=thenerdreich.com).”

[Winehole23]

off the bat, the suggestion that Democrats have somehow hindered the development of Silicon Valley is nonsense, the Dems made them all stupendously rich and influential

[Winehole23]

"Wendy R. Anderson is senior vice president, federal, national security at Palantir Technologies, where she provides executive leadership on Palantir's U.S. and international government businesses."

[Winehole23]

What prompted the latest revamp of the site, however, wasn’t streaming music platforms, it was largely driven by AI. “Google’s pivot to AI search has cut our ad revenue by 70 percent. Prior to that, Facebook and X’s deprioritization of links hurt too, but I can’t downplay the brutal impact of AI Overview,” Lapatine said in a post announcing the site’s relaunch (https://stereogum.com/2478838/stereogum-relaunch/news). Even beyond overviews, though, Lapatine sees AI diminishing these platforms’ usefulness. Every time he logs into Facebook, he says he’s bombarded with videos, “like Ozzie comes back from the dead and hugs a little girl. It’s hard to believe that these platforms are letting themselves be turned into these like slop warehouses.”
https://www.theverge.com/entertainment/821767/stereogum-scott-lapatine-independent-music-media-streaming-ai

[Winehole23]

Larry Summers resigns from Open AI board

Trump should resign too

[Winehole23]

The “innovator’s dilemma” that drives the tech sector means killing off useful, popular products to drive traffic to less useful, less popular products because your business model relies on market domination not consumer value, so consumer needs are not considered in product and strategy decisions.


You can see this in how the CEOs talk at keynotes: the use cases are either very narrow or so tightly choreographed you can’t fathom it working in real life, and despite years now of forced adoption people still describe benefits as futurity and struggle to elucidate what effective usage looks like.https://bsky.app/profile/joshuafoust.com/post/3m5yn6v7vn326

[Winehole23]

NVIDIA beats the earnings forecast, Mr Market will be happy

[SnakeBoy]

Larry Summers resigns from Open AI board

Trump should resign too

He's not on the Open AI board

[SnakeBoy]

https://bsky.app/profile/joshuafoust.com/post/3m5yn6v7vn326

Can't even view post without logging in

Is that part of bluesky recently enhancing moderation to provide an even safer space for libs or has it always been that way?

[Winehole23]

He's not on the Open AI board

of course not, silly

he just resigned


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2wyqv44lm72vasmddeqjgy72/bafkreicykakhpumhrezhpxoenhtnrgybftkzp5pxacrlzzewq 32uqntege@jpeghttps://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/larry-summers-resigns-openai-board-after-epstein-emails-axios-reports-2025-11-19/

[Winehole23]

Can't even view post without logging in

Is that part of bluesky recently enhancing moderation to provide an even safer space for libs or has it always been that way?just sign up

[ChumpDumper]

just sign up

He's too emotionally fragile.

[Winehole23]

He's too emotionally fragile.there's a great variety of SFW and NSFW content on Bluesky, multitudinous hobbies and subcultures

it for sure isn't all about politics

[Winehole23]

He's too emotionally fragile.incurious to learn, certainly reticent in speech

like he's paying for every keystroke, telegraphic

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G6OL2OoXcAAJM3G?format=png&name=900x900

[velik_m]

There is simply not enough power to run all the planned hardware build out, the hardware sales will slow down regardless if AI can deliver value or not.

[Winehole23]

off-balance sheet accounting


financed with debt, and neither the data center nor the debt will be on its own balance sheet. That outcome looks too good to be true, and it probably is


https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreicdfgl3rfmhxuf6lu7kjz6k34gwhyeq3ezoxfeyjw352 jb7m5c3su@jpegttps://www.wsj.com/tech/meta-ai-data-center-finances-d3a6b464?st=YAL8rt&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink (https://www.wsj.com/tech/meta-ai-data-center-finances-d3a6b464)

[Winehole23]

why does Meta want to hide valuable investments?

[Winehole23]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:xciroqs5w2kazs6fc6ypcbh7/bafkreifdjb6po6fq7qjqvnwn3vwhgicfovpp4gitawem4xoaj iti747luy@jpeg

[velik_m]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHiZ-7jI0Ew

[Winehole23]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHiZ-7jI0Ew

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreiaxrdeo37kqone3ujw43iyr6ris4uirgg5eopfdnkt2p xuzrfzl3y@jpeg

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreiffzwpsgpxxt23e3enhzwhdslxmkzakqgkpj3p4upwt4 gwpfs2i7e@jpeg

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreicx2vbfknkvgeydipp257tdkx5ehrzokpr4s6ow6swi5 5zsu5jfiq@jpeg

[Winehole23]

^^^ bootstraps capitalism for thee, gold-plated socialism for me

[ChumpDumper]

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreiaxrdeo37kqone3ujw43iyr6ris4uirgg5eopfdnkt2p xuzrfzl3y@jpeg

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreiffzwpsgpxxt23e3enhzwhdslxmkzakqgkpj3p4upwt4 gwpfs2i7e@jpeg

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:75awacjgw6vxyrxids4wvz72/bafkreicx2vbfknkvgeydipp257tdkx5ehrzokpr4s6ow6swi5 5zsu5jfiq@jpeg

Can't really go backwards when you've already gone off the cliff. All that will be left is for Trump to pick the winners and losers with our bailout money.

[Blake]

So the question then is not if but when will the bubble burst

[Winehole23]

So the question then is not if but when will the bubble burstbailing out Trump's AI megadonors appears to be a foregone conclusion

[Winehole23]

Google cracks the whip

Capacity must double every six months


During an all-hands meeting earlier this month, Google’s AI infrastructure head Amin Vahdat told employees that the company must double its serving capacity every six months to meet demand for artificial intelligence services, reports (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/21/google-must-double-ai-serving-capacity-every-6-months-to-meet-demand.html) CNBC. The comments show a rare look at what Google executives are telling its own employees internally. Vahdat, a vice president at Google Cloud, presented slides to its employees showing the company needs to scale “the next 1000x in 4-5 years.”


While a thousandfold increase in compute capacity sounds ambitious by itself, Vahdat noted some key constraints: Google needs to be able to deliver this increase in capability, compute, and storage networking “for essentially the same cost and increasingly, the same power, the same energy level,” he told employees during the meeting. “It won’t be easy but through collaboration and co-design, we’re going to get there.”
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/11/google-tells-employees-it-must-double-capacity-every-6-months-to-meet-ai-demand/

[Blake]

Google cracks the whip

Capacity must double every six months

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/11/google-tells-employees-it-must-double-capacity-every-6-months-to-meet-ai-demand/

Because our energy were not strained enough already

[Winehole23]

Because our energy were not strained enough alreadyno no, Google wants its workers to increase capacity 1000x without any more energy or people

[ChumpDumper]

Google cracks the whip

Capacity must double every six months

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/11/google-tells-employees-it-must-double-capacity-every-6-months-to-meet-ai-demand/
It won't happen and regular people don't want AI anyway.

[ChumpDumper]

no no, Google wants its workers to increase capacity 1000x without any more energy or people

Just let AI improve AI 1000x. Isn't this what it's for?

[Winehole23]

Just let AI improve AI 1000x. Isn't this what it's for?:lmao

[Winehole23]

It won't happen and regular people don't want AI anyway.I'm currently reading up on how to disable my updated features

[SnakeBoy]

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/8924495/default.png