Bomb Dropped: The Fix Was In (Via Comey/Strzok/Others) For Hillary / Against Trump

[Spurtacular]

:lmao You have to lie to cover up the fact you owned yourself.

That's some sad shit right there.

Going with the ole Hillary strategy, huh? Accuse the person of what you've done. :lol

[Chris]

Going with the ole Hillary strategy, huh? Accuse the person of what you've done. :lol


:lol Chris surrenders again.

Bingo! :lol

[Pavlov]

Going with the ole Hillary strategy, huh? Accuse the person of what you've done. :lolName the crime you think Hillary committed.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

I've proved you're a sperm shielder for Hillary. 'Tis enuff.


And I proved the same...


https://media1.giphy.com/media/q6bawlW2LhNJK/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

[not naming a crime]:lol Name a crime you think Hillary committed.

[Spurtacular]

[still sperm shielding for Hillary]

:lol Name a crime you think Hillary committed.

[spurraider21]

neither of you can name a crime hillary committed.

by spurtacular's rule, that means both of you think its unlikely she committed a crime

[Chris]

I've named bank fraud on several occasions. I believe that to be the tip of the iceberg concerning her rap sheet.

[spurraider21]

I've named bank fraud on several occasions. I believe that to be the tip of the iceberg concerning her rap sheet.
i was referring to pav and derp

but lets talk about bank fraud. what leads you to believe that hillary has committed bank fraud?

[Spurtacular]

i was referring to pav and...

He just wants to go tripping in the weeds. He isn't interested accepting her felonious being for what it is.

[spurraider21]

He just wants to go tripping in the weeds. He isn't interested accepting her felonious being for what it is.
it would be much easier to discuss her felonious being if you were willing to discuss the felonies

[Spurtacular]

it would be much easier to discuss her felonious being if you were willing to discuss the felonies

One cannot follow politics and think Hillary is clean. Only people giving that presumption are sperm shielders.

[spurraider21]

One cannot follow politics and think Hillary is clean. Only people giving that presumption are sperm shielders.
you said people that couldnt even name 1 clinton crime must think its unlikely that she is a criminal

[Spurtacular]

you said people that couldnt even name 1 clinton crime must think its unlikely that she is a criminal

That is not what I have said. I've consistently said that anyone who follows politics has no excuse to believe Hillary is clean.

Also, I've said on many occasions that chump ought to make a thread on this if he is so acutely interested. Why do you think he has not done that?

[spurraider21]

you said people that couldnt even name 1 clinton crime must think its unlikely that she is a criminal


That is not what I have said. I've consistently said that anyone who follows politics has no excuse to believe Hillary is clean.

Also, I've said on many occasions that chump ought to make a thread on this if he is so acutely interested. Why do you think he has not done that?

no, thats exactly what you said


If you can't think of one, then just say that you think it's unlikely Hillary Clinton committed a crime in Whitewater.

[Spurtacular]

no, thats exactly what you said

And was I speaking about "anyone" (and about Hillary's crimes in general)?

Nice try, chump lite.

[Spurtacular]

Also, I've said on many occasions that chump ought to make a thread on this if he is so acutely interested. Why do you think he has not done that?
spurraider21

[spurraider21]

spurraider21 (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=31905)
:lol you already started a thread about the crimes of hillary clinton where you refused to discuss any crimes of hillary clinton

[Spurtacular]

:lol you already started a thread about the crimes of hillary clinton where you refused to discuss any crimes of hillary clinton

I have not. Why do you think chump refuses to do so?

[Pavlov]

:lol you already started a thread about the crimes of hillary clinton where you refused to discuss any crimes of hillary clinton
I have not. The one you made with "Hillary's Crimes" in the title.

[Spurtacular]

The one you made with "Hillary's Crimes" in the title.

Yes, I posted that for those who aren't in denial about her crimes to talk about how they cost her the election. Hardly thread-worthy for a cuck like you.

[Pavlov]

:lol you already started a thread about the crimes of hillary clinton where you refused to discuss any crimes of hillary clinton
I have not.
The one you made with "Hillary's Crimes" in the title.

Yes, I posted that:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:cry

The emphasis of the thread was not Hillary's crimes (innocence or guilt); it was how her crimes cost her the election. If nuance isn't your thing, that's okay. We know you're special.

[Pavlov]

The emphasis of the thread was not Hillary's crimes (innocence or guilt); it was how her crimes cost her the election. If nuance isn't your thing, that's okay. We know you're special.What crimes?

[TSA]

What crimes?

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Strzok overseeing Flynn interrogation; having 50K / months of his texts deleted. Dude dirty as fuck. Sh** unraveling.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EI2SIpKgfS4

[boutons_deux]

Still no Hillary so-called crimes listed. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Hillary so-called crimes

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lmaoYou still can't name one.

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Strzok, who worked on Hillary's exoneration letter a month and half ahead of her 'interview' with the FBI is having all his text messages recovered. Sh** gonna hit the fan. Not a good day for the Hillary sperm shielders like chump and the chumpettes. :lmao

[Pavlov]

:lol"secret society"

[Spurtacular]

:lol"secret society"

FBI agent's own words. These idiots aren't too smart. :rollin

[Pavlov]

FBI agent's own words. These idiots aren't too smart.:lmao doubling down

[Spurtacular]

:cry I'm on a blue pill regimen :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

The first rule of fight club is text explicitly about fight club.

[Spurtacular]

The first rule of fight club is text explicitly about fight club.

:lol Making no sense.

[Pavlov]

:lol Making no sense.You said it.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGrcX1_1lxM

[RandomGuy]

Justice Dept. recovers missing texts from FBI officials


In a letter to lawmakers who had sought the texts, DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz said his office used “forensic tools” to recover the messages from FBI devices. The FBI revealed to Congress earlier this week that five-months’ worth of messages between FBI attorney Lisa Page and senior counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok had been lost because of a technical “misconfiguration.” That issue affected “thousands” of phones within the FBI, officials indicated.


But Republicans jumped on the missing messages to suggest something more sinister was afoot. Horowitz indicated that he would provide the messages to DOJ and emphasized that he had “no objection” if the Justice Department chose to share them with Congress.

The missing messages spanned Dec. 14, 2016, through May 17, 2017, a period when the FBI’s investigation of Trump campaign contacts with Russia intensified. May 17 is also the day Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the Russia inquiry, following President Donald Trump’s decision to fire FBI Director James Comey.

Strzok and Page have emerged as central players in Republican lawmakers’ questions about the handling of the Trump investigation, as well as the FBI’s decision-making in the examination of Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information.

Earlier batches of text messages indicated deep hostility toward Trump — and other political figures of both parties — by Strzok and Page. The messages don’t indicate any wrongdoing — and FBI officials have emphasized that employees are permitted to privately express political views — but GOP lawmakers have argued that they need to investigate further to determine whether Strzok or Page allowed political beliefs to influence their actions in the probe.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/25/missing-fbi-texts-recovered-369448

[RandomGuy]

FBI agent's own words. These idiots aren't too smart. :rollin

Not even the GOP hacks in Congress think that "secret society" was anything other than a joke.

Only stupid mother fuckers think that was anything other than snark.

Wait... were you serious? OMFG... you were. :rollin

[RandomGuy]

The first rule of fight club is text explicitly about fight club.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Not even the GOP hacks in Congress think that "secret society" was anything other than a joke.

Only stupid mother fuckers think that was anything other than snark.

Wait... were you serious? OMFG... you were. :rollin

It is incumbent upon them to act professional and not like they are in a college frat.

[Pavlov]

False narrative.OK, what's your narrative?

[Spurtacular]

OK, what's your narrative?

They went rogue.

[Pavlov]

They went rogue.In a secret society?

[Spurtacular]

In a secret society?

Yea, cos going rogue implies above board. :lol

[Pavlov]

Yea, cos going rogue implies above board. :lolThe secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

[Spurtacular]

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

Do you have a point?

[Pavlov]

Do you have a point?You didn't answer the question.

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

[Spurtacular]

You didn't answer the question.

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

Do you have a point?

[Pavlov]

Do you have a point?Yes.

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Yes.

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

Yes or no.

When you want to make put for some sort of clear assertion, let me know.

[Pavlov]

When you want to make put for some sort of clear assertion, let me know.Well now the point is your a complete pussy who's afraid to answer a simple yes or no question.

[Spurtacular]

^^^

:lol Throwing a tantrum.

[Pavlov]

:cryI am a total pussy and run away from simple questions:cry

[Spurtacular]

:lol

^^^

Still throwing a tantrum.

[Pavlov]

:lol

^^^

Still throwing a tantrum.:lol

^^^

Still not answering a simple yes or no question.

[Spurtacular]

:cry My tantrum is the point. :cry

:lmao

[Pavlov]

:cryMy being a pussy is the point.:cry:lmao

[CosmicCowboy]

One of the latest text message is particularly revealing...all of them agreeing to go easy on Hillary in the interview, because she would get even after she was elected if they didnt.

[Pavlov]

One of the latest text message is particularly revealing...all of them agreeing to go easy on Hillary in the interview, because she would get even after she was elected if they didnt.You let us know what Tucker and Sean have to say about them.

[CosmicCowboy]

You let us know what Tucker and Sean have to say about them.
I dont watch fox but unlike you I do keep an open mind.

[Spurtacular]

:cry I will stay on the pot. No shitting for me. :cry

[Pavlov]

:cryI have already said the sekrit society is fake.

:lol dumbass

[Spurtacular]

I have already said the sekrit society is fake.

:lol dumbass

What does that have to do with you not making whatever your follow-up point is to be?

[Pavlov]

What does that have to do with you not making whatever your follow-up point is to be?you tried to say I hadn't taken a stance.

I'll finish my point about your dumb ass as soon as you answer the yes or no question.

The secret society that was texted about on an unsecured phone?

Yes or no.

[boutons_deux]

The calendar reference was supposedly about a Beefcake calendar featuring Putin

[RandomGuy]

unlike you I do keep an open mind.

https://media.giphy.com/media/CkyV1ZWhU3oGI/giphy.gif


People who call themselves conservative almost invariably curl up in a ball when presented with information that contradicts their worldview, and you fall into that pattern.

[Spurtacular]

:cry I have no point :cry
:cry I'm a pretend prosecutor :cry

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

"Biggest scandal in American history"
"Systematic FISA abuses against the Trump campaign and an incoming president"
"Comparison to KGB tactics"
"memo....will lead to the firing of people at the highest levels of the FBI and DOJ."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IabFhhUlpM

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arabic/cache/file/1A32A6B9-D238-4861-B75813F2DE7B5300.jpg?w=590&h=393&D1F9FF5A-7461-4F65-B2A832893BF963CE

[Pavlov]

lol you can't see it

[CosmicCowboy]

https://media.giphy.com/media/CkyV1ZWhU3oGI/giphy.gif


People who call themselves conservative almost invariably curl up in a ball when presented with information that contradicts their worldview, and you fall into that pattern.
You basically just paraphrase boukaki's RSS feeds.

[koriwhat]

https://media.giphy.com/media/CkyV1ZWhU3oGI/giphy.gif


People who call themselves conservative almost invariably curl up in a ball when presented with information that contradicts their worldview, and you fall into that pattern.

lmao that's a reach... i don't know many conservatives or they're just very good at hiding their affiliation. but the far lefty's i know, oh fuck if your quote doesn't describe them to a T. their world view is a world that's skewed and abstract. bunch of psych patients running the ward.

[Spurtacular]

You basically just paraphrase boukaki's RSS feeds.

Who?

Wouldn't surprise me, though. This guy regurgitates so much sh**.

[Spurtacular]

https://media3.giphy.com/media/jfloLPbpjRg0o/giphy.gif

[Spurtacular]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/attachments/upload_2018-2-4_10-51-37-png.174876/

[Pavlov]

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/022/524/tumblr_o16n2kBlpX1ta3qyvo1_1280.jpg

[Chris]

Charlie 'Pepe Sylvia' meme = "I'm tapping out of this conversation." :lol

[Spurtacular]

Charlie 'Pepe Sylvia' meme = "I'm tapping out of this conversation." :lol

Chump wanting desperately to pretend that networks aren't a part of life.

[Chris]

Chump wanting desperately to pretend that networks aren't a part of life.

He wants to put a tin foil hat on ANYTHING that conflicts with his programming.

[Pavlov]

Charlie 'Pepe Sylvia' meme = "I'm tapping out of this conversation." :lol


Chump wanting desperately to pretend that networks aren't a part of life.You guys keep posting that like it means anything.

Explain it to us.

[Pavlov]

He wants to put a tin foil hat on ANYTHING that conflicts with his programming.OK, explain the FISA process regarding Carter Page in your own words.

[Chris]

You guys keep posting that like it means anything.

Explain it to us.

It means there was a real 'conspiracy' to undermine our elections and get Hillary Clinton elected. The image explains itself. Was there something you were specifically disputing about the image before you put your rubber Charlie stamp on it? Also you keep saying 'us'. It's pretty creepy tbh

[Chris]

OK, explain the FISA process regarding Carter Page in your own words.

You make a lot of demands, but you don't really bring anything to the table do you? A true Socialist.

[Pavlov]

The image explains itself.:lol You can't explain it. You can't even read it.

It's illegible.


Also you keep saying 'us'. It's pretty creepy tbhThere is more than one person reading your posts. It's really stupid of you to pretend otherwise.

[Pavlov]

You make a lot of demands, but you don't really bring anything to the table do you? A true Socialist.:lol You can't explain it.

[Chris]

:lol You can't explain it.

Obama appoints Contreras to FISA court. Contreras issues a warrant to spy on Carter Page. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVNnc2FXcAAJbGN.jpg:large

[Chris]

Obama used the IRS to target conservative groups. FACT. Obama used the FBI to abuse FISA warrants. FACT. Obama used the government to go after his political opponents. FACT.

[Pavlov]

Obama appoints Contreras to FISA court. Contreras issues a warrant to spy on Carter Page. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?:lmao

Presidents do not appoint judges to FISC.

There is no evidence Contreras issued any of the warrants. In fact the WSJ reports that four Republican judges issued the warrants.

[Pavlov]

Obama used the IRS to target conservative groups. FACT. Obama used the FBI to abuse FISA warrants. FACT. Obama used the government to go after his political opponents. FACT.Yeah, these aren't facts.

[Chris]

:lmao

Presidents do not appoint judges to FISC.

There is no evidence Contreras issued any of the warrants. In fact the WSJ reports that four Republican judges issued the warrants.

Implying John Roberts who saved Obamacare when it was on its last gasp wasn't an Obama guy :lol

[Pavlov]

Implying John Roberts who saved Obamacare when it was on its last gasp wasn't an Obama guy :lol:lmao Backing down immediately.

W appointed Roberts.

There is no evidence Contreras issued any of the warrants. In fact the WSJ reports that four Republican judges issued the warrants.

Now five Republican judges are in on your conspiracy.

:lol

[Chris]

This Roberts character holy shit :lol



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Four years ago, John Roberts blew it. In his debut at swearing in the next president, the Supreme Court chief justice stumbled over the oath at Barack Obama’s inauguration ceremony.

That led Obama to mix his words up too (:cry) and the historic swearing-in of the first African-American president briefly became an awkward muddle.

To silence doubts that Obama’s presidency might not be legal because he failed to say the oath properly, the two men tried again the next day in the White House and went through the correct, constitutionally mandated avowal, word for word.

Now, Roberts gets his second try - twice: once in a closed ceremony in the White House’s Blue Room on Sunday, and then the public one on Capitol Hill the next day.

The White House and the Supreme Court are leaving nothing to chance this time.

After Obama won re-election on November 6, the two men exchanged a copy of an oath card, containing the precise wording, punctuation, and emphasis of the 35-word recitation, an inauguration official said.

According to nearly a century of tradition, when the constitutionally required date of January 20 falls on a Sunday, the president is formally sworn in on that day then holds a public ceremony the next day where he repeats the oath again.

The formal oath that makes Obama the president is the one taken on Sunday, but Monday’s ceremony -- and Obama’s inaugural speech -- is what will live on in the minds of Americans and TV viewers around the world as the start of his second term.

“Effectively, Sunday is a dress rehearsal for Monday,” the presidential inauguration committee official said. “It is another opportunity for them to go through it by the time Monday rolls around.”

Judging by the first performance, the two men could use the practice.

On January 20, 2009, Roberts, who was reciting the oath from memory rather than using the customary card, uttered the word “faithfully” out of sequence.

The Constitution requires the president to say, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Roberts instead prompted Obama to say “that I will execute the Office of President of the United States faithfully.” It was a tiny mistake, coming as both Roberts and Obama stumbled at the start of the oath, but enough to raise concerns about whether Obama had been properly sworn in.

[Chris]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDLo_HQCIAA9YKG.jpg

[Pavlov]

This Roberts character holy shit :lolThat's all your panic Google search could bring up?

:lmao

[Chris]

That's all your panic Google search could bring up?

:lmao

Barely skimmed the surface. What does "us" (:lol) have to say about the accusations besides "there is no evidence" (when there is:2 sources) concerning Contreras. Why was Contreras recused from the Flynn investigation Pavlov?

[Pavlov]

Barely skimmed the surface. What does "us" (:lol) have to say about the accusations besides "there is no evidence" (when there is:2 sources) concerning Contreras. Why was Contreras recused from the Flynn investigation Pavlov?Dunno. There is no evidence Contreras issued any of the warrants. In fact the commie rag WSJ reports that four Republican judges issued the warrants. You gonna boycott them?

[Chris]

:lmao

Presidents do not appoint judges to FISC.

There is no evidence Contreras issued any of the warrants. In fact the WSJ reports that four Republican judges issued the warrants.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVK3sI1WkAEBNIn.jpg:large


:lmao

[Pavlov]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVK3sI1WkAEBNIn.jpg:large


:lmaoYes, Chris. He was appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by Barack Obama.

He was not appointed to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by Barack Obama.

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is not the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Do you understand they are two different courts?

Yes or no.

[boutons_deux]

CJ of SCOTUS appoints FISA judges

[Spurtacular]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Na-qyUmNsuE

[Spurtacular]

:lmao McCabe

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-fired-two-days-before-retirement-date-2018-03-16

[koriwhat]

He wants to put a tin foil hat on ANYTHING that conflicts with his programming.


You make a lot of demands, but you don't really bring anything to the table do you? A true Socialist.

:clap


:lmao McCabe

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-fired-two-days-before-retirement-date-2018-03-16

thank god. fuck that pos andy bitchface mccabe!

[Spurtacular]

Strzok doing cozy six-person dinner parties with the FISA judge.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij199TTLZs4

[Chris]

Strzok doing cozy six-person dinner parties with the FISA judge.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij199TTLZs4

Rudy got some splainin' to do :lol

[Spurtacular]

Sh** gonna get real.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/grassley-promises-hearings-into-mccabe’s-firing-once-ig-report-is-public/ar-BBKrnP6?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

[Pavlov]

Sh** gonna get real.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/grassley-promises-hearings-into-mccabe’s-firing-once-ig-report-is-public/ar-BBKrnP6?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhpYou might want to read the article you posted.

[Spurtacular]

You might want to read the article you posted.

You might want to say whatever you want to say (IE get to the point); you know I don't take it upon myself to play your 'lil games.

[Pavlov]

You might want to say whatever you want to say (IE get to the point); you know I don't take it upon myself to play your 'lil games.You just confirmed you didn't read it.

That is my point.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

You just confirmed you didn't read it.

That is my point.

:lol

Good job on getting to the point.

[Pavlov]

Good job on getting to the point.Really, just read the article you posted. It's not quite what you sold it as.

[Spurtacular]

Really, just read the article you posted. It's not quite what you sold it as.

You assumed (par) that the article was anything more than supplemental. McCabe's misdoings are gonna come to light via Congressional trials.

[Pavlov]

You assumed (par) that the article was anything more than supplemental.Supplemental to what?

You're just shitting out syllables now. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Supplemental to what?

You're just shitting out syllables now. :lol

:lmao You obviously need to learn what supplemental means.

[Pavlov]

:lmao You obviously need to learn what supplemental means.Supplemental to what?

You obviously need to run away from another simple question about shit you posted.

[Spurtacular]

Supplemental to what?

You obviously need to run away from another simple question about shit you posted.

You need to stop doubling/tripling/quadrupling down on your fails.

[Pavlov]

You need to stop doubling/tripling/quadrupling down on your fails.You keep running away. :lol

[Spurtacular]

You keep running away. :lol

If you go back and look at the post it is not difficult at all to know how the link is supplemental, provided you know the simple applicability of the word.

:lol #Fails #Losersboard

[Pavlov]

If you go back and look at the post it is not difficult at all to know how the link is supplemental, provided you know the simple applicability of the word.

:lol FailsInBulkNah, you didn't even read the article, so you tried shitting out some syllables in an attempt to save face.

Should've just read the article before you posted it. :lol

You will never answer a direct question.

[Spurtacular]

Nah, you didn't even read the article, so you tried shitting out some syllables in an attempt to save face.

Should've just read the article before you posted it. :lol

I didn't need to read the entirety of the article for it to be supplemental. Seriously, stop shitting yourself and go figure out what the word means; or continue being a laughing stock; dealer's choice. :lol

[Pavlov]

I didn't need to read the entirety of the article for it to be supplemental.Supplemental to what?

You will never answer a direct question. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Supplemental to what?

You will never answer a direct question. :lol

Supplemental to the point, bro. This sh** is not hard to figure out. I'll explain it more fully if you want to admit you're #SpecialNeeds.

[Pavlov]

Supplemental to the point, bro. This sh** is not hard to figure out. I'll explain it more fully if you want to admit you're #SpecialNeeds.What point?

That shit is going to get real?

The article pretty much suggests the opposite of your idea of hist getting real tbh.

[Spurtacular]

What point?

You post the original quote and tell me that you don't see the point. If you do that, then I'll oblige your #SpecialNeeds (further).

[Pavlov]

You post the original quote and tell me that you don't see the point. If you do that, then I'll oblige your #SpecialNeeds:lmao it's really clear you read none of the article.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao it's really clear you read none of the article.

:lol Falling back to meandering narratives. Post my original quote and then tell me how you don't see "the point." Or is your tantrum over now?

[Pavlov]

:lol Falling back to meandering narratives. Post my original quote and then tell me how you don't see "the point." Or is your tantrum over now?The article shits on your "point."

The article does not supplement your "point."

[Spurtacular]

The article shits on your "point."

The article does not supplement your "point."

What is the point? And how does it "shit on the point"?

[Spurtacular]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/19/politics/justice-mccabe-criminal-referral/index.html

https://i0.wp.com/flabbergasted-vibes.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/8lK71Hv-Imgur.gif?resize=480%2C360

[spurraider21]

CNN

[Spurtacular]

CNN

Your point?

[Chucho]

Your point?

CNN good now.

[Spurtacular]

CNN good now.

I never said that.

[Chucho]

I never said that.

Good lord. Nevermind.

[Pavlov]

Good lord. Nevermind.:lmao

[Spurtacular]

Good lord. Nevermind.

Do you really think I don't understand the gimpy point your trying to make?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao

So desperate for a W that you're piggybacking on chucho lashing out like a gimp. :lmao

[Pavlov]

So desperate for a W that you're piggybacking on chucho lashing out like a gimp. :lmaoSo sensitive.

Do you need us to take it easy on you?

[spurraider21]

Good lord. Nevermind.
:lol

[Spurtacular]

:lol

Yea, I wouldn't make a case for your shitty point either.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Wanting immunity from being criminal on the job.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/andrew-mccabe-seeks-immunity-for-testimony-in-congressional-hearing-over-fbi-handling-of-clinton-email-probe/ar-AAygCkH?ocid=spartandhp

[Spurtacular]

https://i.redd.it/b5nv6i5v7fw01.png

:rollin

http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/mueller-lawyer-resisted-trump/


An FBI attorney who worked on the special counsel’s Russia investigation until earlier this year sent anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, including one exclaiming: “Viva le Resistance.”
The attorney’s comments are revealed in a Justice Department inspector general’s report released on Thursday.
The lawyer is not identified, but he worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation and was the FBI’s lead attorney on the investigation into Russian election interference.


“I am numb,” the attorney wrote on Nov. 9, 2016, the day after President Trump’s election.
“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” the lawyer continued, apparently referring to the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe.
The attorney’s messages show that he was distressed at the FBI’s decision in October 2016 to re-open the investigation into Clinton’s emails. Democrats have claimed that decision hurt Clinton at the polls.
The FBI lawyer also suggested that he would work to resist the Trump administration.
“Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?” one FBI lawyer wrote on Nov. 22, 2016.
“Hell no. Viva le resistance,” the future Mueller attorney responded.

[Reck]

:lmao you actually bumped a thread where you got ethered and run the fuck out of.

Derp in all his glory, ya'll. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you actually bumped a thread where you got ethered and run the fuck out of.

Derp in all his glory, ya'll. :lmao

Damn you dumb, tranny.

[Spurtacular]

Since you missed it, this is pretty much how this thread has went for me in every respect:

https://i0.wp.com/flabbergasted-vibes.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/8lK71Hv-Imgur.gif?resize=480%2C360

[dabom]

:lmao you actually bumped a thread where you got ethered and run the fuck out of.

Derp in all his glory, ya'll. :lmao

OP. :lmao

[Pavlov]

Since you missed it, this is pretty much how this thread has went for me in every respect:

https://i0.wp.com/flabbergasted-vibes.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/8lK71Hv-Imgur.gif?resize=480%2C360In your own opinion and words, what criminal charges should be brought against Hillary Clinton?

[Spurtacular]

In your own opinion and words, what criminal charges should be brought against Hillary Clinton?

I've told you about a hundred time now to start a thread on this. Why won't you?

[Pavlov]

I've told you about a hundred time now to start a thread on this. Why won't you?I prefer to see you whine

You're never going to answer anyway.

Continue whining, derp.

lol

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

I prefer to see you whine

You're never going to answer anyway.

Continue whining, derp.

lol

You'd prefer to have your standard diversion intact. :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

The bomb fizzeled. Must have been a dud.

[Pavlov]

The bomb fizzeled. Must have been a dud.

:lol he really thought he had something.

Boiled down: No charges against Hillary. Even in derp's imagination.

[Spurtacular]

:lol he really thought he had something.

Boiled down: No charges against Hillary. Even in derp's imagination.

Fake narrative. Par.

[Pavlov]

Fake narrative. Par.Oh, then what are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Conditions incoming.

[Spurtacular]

Oh, then what are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Conditions incoming.

This thread has never explicitly been about bringing charges against her. I'm still waiting for you to make that thread, btw.

[Pavlov]

This thread has never explicitly been about bringing charges against her. I'm still waiting for you to make that thread, btw.lol predicted

Why?

There's no rule that says a new thread has to be started.

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Just answer. You aren't doing anything else but whining.

[Spurtacular]

lol predicted

Why?

There's no rule that says a new thread has to be started.

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Just answer. You aren't doing anything else but whining.

Sure there's a rule. I've ruled many times that I will not be humoring your standard distraction. Yet you persist and only prove that that is what you're doing.

[Pavlov]

Sure there's a rule. I've ruled many times that I will not be humoring your standard distraction. Yet you persist and only prove that that is what you're doing.the only thing i'm distracting from is your whining.

This thread is dead except for your whining, so just answer the question:

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

[Spurtacular]

the only thing i'm distracting from is your whining.

This thread is dead except for your whining, so just answer the question:

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

And the inevitable tantrum.

[Pavlov]

And the inevitable tantrum.Yep, you're throwing one right now instead of answering a simple question:

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Answer or whine some more. Your choice.

[Spurtacular]

Yep, you're throwing one right now instead of answering a simple question:

What are the criminal charges you say should be brought against her?

Answer or whine some more. Your choice.

Butt posting too. Par.

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Schiff "disturbed" that a top govt. lawmaker was given access to information that Hillary served on a platter to the rest of the world.
:lmao Can't make this stuff up.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/schiff-‘deeply-disturbing’-that-fbi-gave-nunes-confidential-info-on-clintons-emails/ar-AAyLFzD?ocid=spartanntp

[Pavlov]

:lmao Schiff "disturbed" that a top govt. lawmaker was given access to information that Hillary served on a platter to the rest of the world.
:lmao Can't make this stuff up.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/schiff-‘deeply-disturbing’-that-fbi-gave-nunes-confidential-info-on-clintons-emails/ar-AAyLFzD?ocid=spartanntpWhat criminal charges do you think should be given to Hillary Clinton?

[Winehole23]

:lmao Schiff "disturbed" that a top govt. lawmaker was given access to information that Hillary served on a platter to the rest of the world.
:lmao Can't make this stuff up.

seems to me a person bothered by disclosure of classified info on Clinton's unsecure server might also be bothered by FBI field agents revealing classified information to sway an election.

(shrugs)

[TeyshaBlue]

seems to me a person bothered by disclosure of classified info on Clinton's unsecure server might also be bothered by FBI field agents revealing classified information to sway an election.

(shrugs)
#nothillary

[Spurtacular]

:cry Muh standard sperm shielding :cry

[Spurtacular]

seems to me a person bothered by disclosure of classified info on Clinton's unsecure server might also be bothered by FBI field agents revealing classified information to sway an election.

(shrugs)

Why would I be bothered that we didn't put a felon in office?

[Winehole23]

what makes you sure we didn't?

[Pavlov]

Why would I be bothered that we didn't put a felon in office?Which felon?

[Spurtacular]

what makes you sure we didn't?

Why would that matter to me not being upset that Hillary didn't win the presidency? Also :lol at this response in the first place. You gonna offer me sour grapes, son?

[Winehole23]

not at all, just looking for some consistency in what you're saying.

ah, found it here:


Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[Spurtacular]

not at all, just looking for some consistency in what you're saying.

ah, found it here:

The election wasn't fixed. You offered a well-known felon on the Democratic side. Glaring realities, dude.

[Spurtacular]

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/44/06/9f/44069f9bb0bb37d1ec939d1503fd111d--political-beliefs-the-crow.jpg

[Spurtacular]

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/2e/72/d5/2e72d5f742e7a176a642c1fc675e0ea6--hillary-clinton-anti-obama-clinton.jpg

[Winehole23]

The election wasn't fixed. You offered a well-known felon on the Democratic side. Glaring realities, dude.Glaring fantasies, more like. I didn't nominate HRC.

I get that you're not a court of law, and that people can be tried and convicted of felonies in your own mind.

If you dream in one hand and shit in the other, which one fills up faster?

[Spurtacular]

Glaring fantasies, more like. I didn't nominate HRC.

I get that you're not a court of law, and that people can be tried and convicted of felonies in your own mind.

If you dream in one hand and shit in the other, which one fills up faster?

Yea, there's no such thing as corruption in our system. Keep jacking off, bro.

[Winehole23]

More fantasies.

Toodles!

[Spurtacular]

More fantasies.

Toodles!

I agree. Thinking that career politicians don't make decisions based on their self interests is fantasies.

[Reck]

:lol reduced to posting Hillary memes like that somehow means anything.

[Pavlov]

The election wasn't fixed. You offered a well-known felon on the Democratic side. Glaring realities, dude.What felonies?

List them.

[Spurtacular]

:cry Muh standard deflection. :cry

[Spurtacular]

:cry reduced to posting Hillary memes like that somehow means anything. :cry

Tranny tears.

[Pavlov]

Can't be a deflection when it is directly what you are talking about.

You called Hillary Clinton a known felon.

What are you saying are her felonies?

[Spurtacular]

Can't be a deflection when it is directly what you are talking about.

You called Hillary Clinton a known felon.

What are you saying are her felonies?

And for argument's sake, you are one of the people who doesn't know it.

[Pavlov]

And for argument's sake, you are one of the people who doesn't know it.
What are you saying are her felonies?

[Reck]

And for argument's sake, you are one of the people who doesn't know it.

Prove it.

[Spurtacular]

Prove it.

:lol There is no way you go to your grave believing Hillary has not committed felonies.

[Pavlov]

:lol There is no way you go to your grave believing Hillary has not committed felonies.Which felonies?

List them.

[Spurtacular]

Which felonies?

List them.

No way you go to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes either.

[Pavlov]

No way you go to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes either.Which crimes?

List them.

[Spurtacular]

Which crimes?

List them.

You going to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes?

[Pavlov]

You going to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes?Which crimes, derp?

You keep bringing them up and you keep shitting yourself when asked about them.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Which crimes, derp?

You keep bringing them up and you keep shitting yourself when asked about them.

lol

You got 24 hours to live; you going to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

You got 24 hours to live; you going to your grave believing Hillary didn't commit crimes?

Yes or no.I wouldn't even think about that at all.

Why are you constantly shitting yourself when asked about the alleged crimes you bring up?

[Spurtacular]

I wouldn't even think about that at all.


I'll take that as no. :lol

[Pavlov]

I'll take that as no. :lol
What are you saying are her felonies?

[Spurtacular]

What are you saying are her felonies?

Still waiting for you to start that thread.

[Pavlov]

Still waiting for you to start that thread.
Still shitting your pants.

lol

[dabom]

:lol

[RandomGuy]

:lol There is no way you go to your grave believing Hillary has not committed felonies.

What felonies?

Asking for a friend.

[Spurtacular]

What felonies?

Asking for a friend.

Your friend sounds pretty stupid. :lol

[Reck]

Your friend sounds pretty stupid. :lol

Another day..another dodge.

[Spurtacular]

Another day..another dodge.

Another day..you're still a tranny.

[Reck]

Would you like to eat my ass?

Your golden goose.

[Spurtacular]

Your golden goose.

Yup. To a man, tranny and cuck it shows how desperate the chumpettes are. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

Rosenstein coming off like the little bitch he is. :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOcjwz5xp4k

[Pavlov]

Rosenstein coming off like the little bitch he is. :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOcjwz5xp4kIngraham is still a thing?

[Spurtacular]

Ingraham is still a thing?

:lol Today's Hillary sperm shielder.

[Spurtacular]

:lol All the chumpettes in the gallery trying to sperm shield for Rosenstein as Jim Jordan hands him his ass...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLVSD9K5kp0

[Reck]

:lol All the chumpettes in the gallery trying to sperm shield for Rosenstein as Jim Jordan hands him his ass...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLVSD9K5kp0

No game having derp thinks this was an own. :lol

Guy basically ranted non stop with a bunch of nonsense and falsehoods and then got shut down with a one-liner that got the full room laughing at :lol Jim :lol Jordan

[boutons_deux]

Repug Congresspeople grandstanding as angry, outraged, Macho Man assholes for the camera, is why this dog-and-pony show wasn't behind closed doors.

"fake news"

[Spurtacular]

No game having derp thinks this was an own. :lol

Guy basically ranted non stop with a bunch of nonsense and falsehoods and then got shut down with a one-liner that got the full room laughing at :lol Jim :lol Jordan

Tell us what really happened, tranny. Don't make me embarrass you.

[Pavlov]

Tell us what really happened, tranny. Don't make me embarrass you.He just did.

I am laughing at Republicans ranting at Republican Trump appointees about being meanies to the guy who appointed them.

[boutons_deux]

Repugs trying to distract from the Trash/Miller ONGOING BABY JAILS

[Spurtacular]

He just did.

I am laughing at Republicans ranting at Republican Trump appointees about being meanies to the guy who appointed them.

You didn't even watch the video. You're pathetic. :lmao

[Pavlov]

You didn't even watch the video. You're pathetic. :lmaoI did.

Why are you so angry about Trump's appointees, derp?

Explain.

[Spurtacular]

I did.

Why are you so angry about Trump's appointees, derp?

Explain.

Oh, then you're just doing that fiction thing again.

:lol Angry about Trump appointees.
:lol Blaming a redaction for the most important case in the nation, a case that he oversees hands on on the run-of-the-mill employee.
:lol You would not accept that weak trash if this had been your Hillary.

[Pavlov]

Oh, then you're just doing that fiction thing again.

:lol Angry about Trump appointees.
:lol Blaming a redaction for the most important case in the nation, a case that he oversees hands on on the run-of-the-mill employee.
:lol You would not accept that weak trash if this had been your Hillary.Redactions are common and routine and there's no way a DAG was sitting there with a Marks-a-Lot doing them himself.

Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

[Spurtacular]

Redactions are common and routine and there's no way a DAG was sitting there with a Marks-a-Lot doing them himself.

Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

He's gonna sign-off on this. I know you're not that naive; you're just a trained cuck.

:lmao #StillWithHer

[Pavlov]

He's gonna sign-off on this. I know you're not that naive; you're just a trained cuck.

:lmao #StillWithHerlol tired catchphrase white flags

You didn't answer the question: Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

[Spurtacular]

lol tired catchphrase white flags

You didn't answer the question: Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

If you found new heroes, you wouldn't have to be slammed continuously and call it "white flags".

What was redacted is that Peter Strzok and Judge Contreras were friends. What was your hero's account of why that was so?

[Pavlov]

If you found new heroes, you wouldn't have to be slammed continuously and call it "white flags".You didn't answer the question: Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

[Spurtacular]

You didn't answer the question: Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

Non sequitur.

What was redacted is that Peter Strzok and Judge Contreras were friends. What was your hero's account of why that was so?

[Pavlov]

Non sequitur.:lmao you don't know what that means.

Jordan didn't even want anyone's account of anything. He just wanted to make his speech and turn you on.

Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao you don't know what that means.

Jordan didn't even want anyone's account of anything. He just wanted to make his speech and turn you on.

Why are you so angry at Trump's appointee?

The question was directly posed. What was your hero's account for why the names were redacted?

[Pavlov]

The question was directly posed. What was your hero's account for why the names were redacted?He wasn't able to give one at that time because Jordan wanted to finish his speech.

It's telling you and the other Dennison bots only bothered to post videos of the representatives' time for speeches.

You are not interested in answers.

At all.

You're angry at a Trump appointee because you were told to be. You can't explain it any other way.

lol

[Spurtacular]

He wasn't able to give one at that time because Jordan wanted to finish his speech.

It's telling you and the other Dennison bots only bothered to post videos of the representatives' time for speeches.

You are not interested in answers.

At all.

You're angry at a Trump appointee because you were told to be. You can't explain it any other way.

lol

That wasn't the answer. Watch it and then give a non-ignorant answer.

[Pavlov]

That wasn't the answer. Watch it and then give a non-ignorant answer.OK, tell me what the answer was.

[Spurtacular]

OK, tell me what the answer was.

The answer was that another employee did it and he was too incompetent to do proper oversight.

[Reck]

:lmao you don't know what that means.

LMAO. I was about to say..

Guy thinks throwing up fancy words is going to make him make sense or look smart.

It does exactly the opposite.

[Spurtacular]

LMAO. I was about to say..

Guy thinks throwing up fancy words is going to make him make sense or look smart.

It does exactly the opposite.

LMAO this grudge post in tranny voice.

[Pavlov]

The answer was that another employee did it and he was too incompetent to do proper oversight.I said already said he didn't do the redacting, dumbass.

[Spurtacular]

I said already said he didn't do the redacting, dumbass.

Yea, he tried to divorce himself from the process on the biggest case in the nation :lmao

[Pavlov]

Yea, he tried to divorce himself from the process on the biggest case in the nation :lmaoWhat is your conspiracy theory here?

[Spurtacular]

What is your conspiracy theory here?

A "conspiracy theory" is not at judgment. No matter what you believe, he's not fit to do his job.

[Pavlov]

A "conspiracy theory" is not at judgment. No matter what you believe, he's not fit to do his job.You're saying Trump was a terrible judge of talent and character when he hired RR.

You're free to believe Trump is that bad at his job.

[Reck]

LMAO this grudge post in tranny voice.

Grudge? What for?

You're a pitiful guy who's deadly afraid to admit you like cocks. ST is a first step, I guess. Now if only you had the courage to tell your mother even if it means you get disowned and thrown out of the basement. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Grudge? What for?

You're a pitiful guy who's deadly afraid to admit you like cocks. ST is a first step, I guess. Now if only you had the courage to tell your mother even if it means you get disowned and thrown out of the basement. :lol

Again, imagining the tranny voice and this post laughs at itself. :lmao

[Spurtacular]

You're saying Trump was a terrible judge of talent and character when he hired RR.

You're free to believe Trump is that bad at his job.

Another non sequitur. Or if you prefer, false narrative.

[Reck]

Again, imagining the tranny voice and this post laughs at itself. :lmao

You can be honest with ST. Imagining how a tranny sounds is not the least of your wanting.

[Pavlov]

Another non sequitur. Or if you prefer, false narrative.
So Trump did a great job when he hired RR?

Which is it?

[Spurtacular]

You can be honest with ST. Imagining how a tranny sounds is not the least of your wanting.

I'm just saying that pseudo veracities of your posts are most easily understood when considering the origin of the source; and of course, these posts of yours are pretty laughable as a result. But I know you're biased in favor of your tranny community and have a hard time seeing it from the hetero perspective.

[Spurtacular]

So Trump did a great job when he hired RR?

Which is it?

RR is unfit to do his job. Your desperation to pin that one Trump doesn't bother me.

[Pavlov]

RR is unfit to do his job. Your desperation to pin that one Trump doesn't bother me.
Trump hired him.

[Spurtacular]

Trump hired him.

Shameless deflection all the same. RR's either doing the job well or he isn't.

[Pavlov]

Shameless deflection all the same. RR's either doing the job well or he isn't.
Trump made a successful hire or he failed.

[Spurtacular]

Trump made a successful hire or he failed.

The issue isn't Trump's hires/promotions. You're sperm shielding. Par.

[Pavlov]

The issue isn't Trump's hires/promotions.Rosenstein is Trump's hire, but somehow Rosenstien isn't an issue.

lol derp logic.